{{Short description|International maritime law}} {{Use dmy dates|date=October 2025}} {{Use Oxford spelling|date=January 2019}}{{Infobox Treaty | name = United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea | image = UNCLOS logo.svg{{!}}class=skin-invert | image_size = 120px | caption = Logo of the Convention | date_drafted = | date_signed = 10 December 1982 | location_signed = Montego Bay, Jamaica | date_sealed = | date_effective = 16 November 1994<ref name="history">{{cite web |url=https://www.un.org/Depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_historical_perspective.htm |title=The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (A historical perspective) |publisher=United Nations Division for Ocean Affairs and the Law of the Sea |access-date=30 April 2009 |archive-date=15 September 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220915020937/https://www.un.org/Depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_historical_perspective.htm |url-status=live }}</ref> | condition_effective = 60 ratifications | date_expiration = | signatories = 157<ref name=rat>{{cite web|url=https://treaties.un.org/pages/ViewDetailsIII.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=XXI-6&chapter=21&Temp=mtdsg3&clang=_en|title=United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea|access-date=1 December 2013|publisher=United Nations Treaty Series|archive-date=18 May 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210518174934/https://treaties.un.org/pages/ViewDetailsIII.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=XXI-6&chapter=21&Temp=mtdsg3&clang=_en|url-status=live}}</ref> | parties = 172<ref name=rat/><ref>{{cite web| url=https://www.un.org/Depts/los/reference_files/chronological_lists_of_ratifications.htm| title=Chronological lists of ratifications of, accessions and successions to the Convention and the related Agreements| publisher=United Nations Division for Ocean Affairs and the Law of the Sea| date=8 January 2010| access-date=24 February 2010| archive-date=14 April 2009| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090414043900/http://www.un.org/depts/los/reference_files/chronological_lists_of_ratifications.htm| url-status=live}}</ref> | depositor = Secretary-General of the United Nations | languages = Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Russian, and Spanish | website = | wikisource = United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea }} {{International ownership conventions}} {{United Nations series}} The '''United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea''' ('''UNCLOS'''), also called the '''Law of the Sea Convention''' or the '''Law of the Sea Treaty''', is an international treaty that establishes a legal framework for all marine and maritime activities. {{As of|2024|10}}, 169 sovereign states and the European Union are parties.<ref>{{Cite web |title=United Nations Treaty Collection |url=https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetailsIII.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=XXI-6&chapter=21&Temp=mtdsg3&clang=_en |access-date=29 July 2024 |website=treaties.un.org |language=EN}}</ref> The United States is among the states that have not ratified the treaty.
The convention resulted from the third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS III), which took place between 1973 and 1982. UNCLOS replaced the four treaties of the 1958 Convention on the High Seas. UNCLOS came into force in 1994, a year after Guyana became the 60th nation to ratify the treaty.<ref name="history" /> In 2023, agreement was reached on a High Seas Treaty to be added as an instrument of the convention, to protect ocean life in international waters. This would provide measures including marine protected areas and environmental impact assessments.
While the secretary-general of the United Nations receives instruments of ratification and accession and the UN provides support for meetings of states party to the convention, the United Nations Secretariat has no direct operational role in the implementation of the convention. A UN specialized agency, the International Maritime Organization, does play a role, however, as do other bodies such as the International Whaling Commission and the International Seabed Authority (ISA), which was established by the convention itself.
==Background== United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea replaces the older "freedom of the seas" concept, dating from the 17th century. According to this concept, national rights were limited to a specified belt of water extending from a nation's coastlines, usually {{convert|3|nmi|km mi}} (three-mile limit), according to the "cannon shot" rule developed by the Dutch jurist Cornelius van Bynkershoek.<ref name="Akashi-Bynkershoek">{{cite book|last1=Akashi|first1=Kinji|title=Cornelius Van Bynkershoek: His Role in the History of International Law|date=2 October 1998|publisher=Martinus Nijhoff Publishers|isbn=978-9041105998|page=150|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=8Pp--yPYL58C&q=Cornelius%20van%20Bynkershoek%20cannon&pg=PA150|access-date=12 July 2016|ref=Akashi-Bynkershoek|archive-date=10 March 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230310133150/https://books.google.com/books?id=8Pp--yPYL58C&q=Cornelius%20van%20Bynkershoek%20cannon&pg=PA150|url-status=live}}</ref> All waters beyond national boundaries were considered international waters: free to all nations, but belonging to none of them (the ''mare liberum'' principle propounded by Hugo Grotius).<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/grotius-the-freedom-of-the-seas-latin-and-english-version-magoffin-trans|title=The Freedom of the Seas (Latin and English version, Magoffin trans.) – Online Library of Liberty|website=oll.libertyfund.org|access-date=27 January 2017|archive-date=16 November 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201116115753/https://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/grotius-the-freedom-of-the-seas-latin-and-english-version-magoffin-trans|url-status=live}}</ref>
In the early 20th century, some nations expressed their desire to extend national claims: to include mineral resources, to protect fish stocks, and to provide the means to enforce pollution controls. The League of Nations called a 1930 conference at The Hague, but no agreements resulted.<ref>{{cite web |title=Chapter 1: International Law, Adoption of the Law of the Sea Convention – Law of the Sea |url=https://sites.tufts.edu/lawofthesea/chapter-one |website=Law of the Sea: A Policy Primer |publisher=The Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University |access-date=14 May 2019 |archive-date=14 April 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210414230030/https://sites.tufts.edu/lawofthesea/chapter-one/ |url-status=live }}</ref> Using the customary international-law principle of a nation's right to protect its natural resources, Harry S. Truman in 1945 extended United States control to all the natural resources of its continental shelf. Other nations were quick to follow suit. Between 1946 and 1950, Chile, Peru, and Ecuador extended their rights to a distance of {{convert|200|nmi|km mi}} to cover their Humboldt Current fishing grounds. Other nations extended their territorial seas to {{convert|12|nmi|km mi}}.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Marley|first=David|title=Modern piracy : a reference handbook|date=2011|publisher=ABC-CLIO|isbn=978-1-59884-434-4|location=Santa Barbara, Calif.|oclc=699488885}}</ref>
By 1967, only 25 nations still used the old three nautical mile limit,<ref name="Three Mile Limit">{{Cite web|title=Three Mile Limit|url=http://www.offshoreradiomuseum.co.uk/page965.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201104134916/http://www.offshoreradiomuseum.co.uk/page965.html|url-status=dead|archive-date=4 November 2020|website=www.offshoreradiomuseum.co.uk|access-date=30 May 2020}}</ref> while 66 nations had set a {{convert|12|nmi|km|adj=on}} territorial limit<ref>{{Cite web|title=Three mile limit|url=http://www.offshoreradiomuseum.co.uk/page965.html|access-date=30 May 2020|archive-date=25 February 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210225090218/http://www.offshoreradiomuseum.co.uk/page965.html|url-status=live}}</ref> and eight had set a {{convert|200|nmi|km|adj=on}} limit. {{As of|2011|07|15}}, only Jordan still uses the {{convert|3|mi|km|adj=on}} limit.<ref>{{Cite web |date=25 April 2021 |title=Table of claims to maritime jurisdiction (as at 15 July 2011)/maritime spaces of countries |url=http://iilss.net/table-of-claims-to-maritime-jurisdiction-as-at-15-july-2011-maritime-spaces-of-countries/ |access-date=21 April 2022 |website=IILSS-International institute for Law of the Sea Studies |language=en-US |archive-date=6 October 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221006051814/https://iilss.net/table-of-claims-to-maritime-jurisdiction-as-at-15-july-2011-maritime-spaces-of-countries/ |url-status=live }}</ref> That limit is also used in certain Australian islands, an area of Belize, some Japanese straits, certain areas of Papua New Guinea, and a few British Overseas Territories, such as Gibraltar.<ref>{{Cite book|chapter=transit regions of the world|doi=10.1163/9789004327115_006|chapter-url=https://brill.com/view/book/edcoll/9789004327115/B9789004327115_006.xml|title=Navigational Restrictions within the New LOS Context|year=2017|pages=143–173|isbn=9789004327108|last1=Alexander|first1=Lewis M.|editor-first1=J. Ashley |editor-last1=Roach |access-date=25 September 2020|archive-date=17 April 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210417134546/https://brill.com/view/book/edcoll/9789004327115/B9789004327115_006.xml|url-status=live}}</ref>
UNCLOS does not deal with matters of territorial disputes or to resolve issues of sovereignty, as that field is governed by rules of customary international law on the acquisition and loss of territory.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Chagos: A boundary dispute tips over a sovereignty ruling|url=https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/chagos-boundary-dispute-tips-over-sovereignty-ruling|access-date=10 October 2021|website=www.lowyinstitute.org|language=en|archive-date=10 October 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211010114421/https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/chagos-boundary-dispute-tips-over-sovereignty-ruling|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|date=6 May 2021|title=Professor Robert Beckman on the Role of UNCLOS in Maritime Disputes|url=https://gjia.georgetown.edu/2021/05/06/professor-robert-beckman-on-the-role-of-unclos-in-maritime-disputes/|access-date=10 October 2021|website=Georgetown Journal of International Affairs|language=en-US|archive-date=10 October 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211010114411/https://gjia.georgetown.edu/2021/05/06/professor-robert-beckman-on-the-role-of-unclos-in-maritime-disputes/|url-status=live}}</ref>
The United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 14 has a target regarding conservative and sustainable use of oceans and their resources in line with UNCLOS legal framework.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Goal 14 targets |url=https://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/sustainable-development-goals/goal-14-life-below-water/targets.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930060036/https://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/sustainable-development-goals/goal-14-life-below-water/targets.html |archive-date=30 September 2020 |access-date=24 September 2020 |website=UNDP |language=en}}</ref>
== UNCLOS I == {| class="wikitable" align="right" style="margin-left:10px" |+ Territorial waters claims by coastal states in 1960<ref name=mlr82-behuniak>{{cite journal |url=https://www.jagcnet.army.mil/DOCLIBS/MILITARYLAWREVIEW.NSF/20a66345129fe3d885256e5b00571830/b3197adca4437e4d85256e5b0057ee6a/$FILE/MLR%2027-100-82%2019781001.pdf |title=The Seizure and Recovery of the S.S. Mayaguez: Legal Analysis of United States Claims, Part 1 |author=Major Thomas E. Behuniak |journal=Military Law Review |volume=82 |publisher=Department of the Army |date=Fall 1978 |issn=0026-4040 |pages=114–121 |access-date=21 July 2014 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161228203240/https://www.jagcnet.army.mil/DOCLIBS/MILITARYLAWREVIEW.NSF/20a66345129fe3d885256e5b00571830/b3197adca4437e4d85256e5b0057ee6a/$FILE/MLR%2027-100-82%2019781001.pdf |archive-date=28 December 2016 }}</ref> |- ! Breadth claim !! Number of states |- | 3-mile limit || 26 |- | 4-mile limit || 3 |- | 5-mile limit || 1 |- | 6-mile limit || 16 |- | 9-mile limit || 1 |- | 10-mile limit || 2 |- | 12-mile limit || 34 |- | More than 12-miles || 9 |- | Unspecified || 11 |} In 1958, the United Nations held its first Conference on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS I) at Geneva, Switzerland. UNCLOS I<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/8_1.htm |title=UNCLOS I |access-date=16 October 2013 |archive-date=17 October 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131017052206/http://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/8_1.htm |url-status=live }}</ref> resulted in four treaties concluded in 1958:
* Convention on the Territorial Sea and Contiguous Zone, entry into force: 10 September 1964 * Convention on the Continental Shelf, entry into force: 10 June 1964 * Convention on the High Seas, entry into force: 30 September 1962 * Convention on Fishing and Conservation of Living Resources of the High Seas, entry into force: 20 March 1966
Although UNCLOS I was considered a success, it left open the important issue of breadth of territorial waters.<ref name=mlr82-behuniak/>
== UNCLOS II ==
In 1960, the United Nations held the second Conference on the Law of the Sea ("UNCLOS II"); however, the six-week Geneva conference did not result in any new agreements.<ref name=mlr82-behuniak/> Generally speaking, developing nations and third world countries participated only as clients, allies, or dependents of the United States or the Soviet Union, with no significant voice of their own.<ref name="Three Mile Limit"/>
== UNCLOS III == thumb|Maritime zones under international law
The issue of varying claims of territorial waters was raised in the UN in 1967 by Arvid Pardo of Malta, and in 1973 the ''Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea'' convened in New York. In an attempt to reduce the possibility of groups of nation-states dominating the negotiations, the conference used a consensus process rather than majority vote. With more than 160 nations participating, the conference lasted until 1982. The resulting convention came into force on 16 November 1994, one year after the 60th state, Guyana, ratified the treaty.
The convention introduced a number of provisions. The most significant issues covered were setting limits, navigation, archipelagic status and transit regimes, exclusive economic zones (EEZs), continental shelf jurisdiction, deep seabed mining, the exploitation regime, protection of the marine environment, scientific research, and settlement of disputes.
The convention set the limit of various areas, measured from a carefully defined baseline. (Normally, a sea baseline follows the low-water line, but when the coastline is deeply indented, has fringing islands or is highly unstable, straight baselines may be used.) The areas are as follows:
* Internal waters: Covers all water and waterways on the landward side of the baseline. The coastal state is free to set laws, regulate use, and use any resource. Foreign vessels have no right of passage within internal waters. A vessel in the high seas assumes jurisdiction under the internal laws of its flag state. * Archipelagic waters: The convention set the definition of "Archipelagic States" in Part IV, which also defines how the state can draw its territorial borders. A baseline is drawn between the outermost points of the outermost islands, subject to these points being sufficiently close to one another. All waters inside this baseline are designated "Archipelagic Waters". The state has sovereignty over these waters to the extent it has over internal waters, but subject to existing rights including traditional fishing rights of immediately adjacent states.<ref name="UNCLOS3">{{cite web |title=UNCLOS 3 Article 51 |url=https://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/closindx.htm |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210421035346/https://www.un.org/Depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/closindx.htm |archive-date=21 April 2021 |access-date=29 March 2016 |publisher=United Nations Division for Ocean Affairs and Law of the Sea}}</ref> Foreign vessels have right of innocent passage through archipelagic waters, but archipelagic states may limit innocent passage to designated sea lanes. * Territorial sea: Up to {{convert|12|nmi|km mi|abbr=off}} from the baseline, the coastal state is free to set laws, regulate the use, and use any resource; in essence, the coastal State enjoys Sovereign rights and sovereign jurisdiction within its territorial sea. Vessels were given the right of innocent passage through any territorial sea, with strategic straits allowing the passage of military craft as transit passage, in that naval vessels are allowed to maintain postures that would be illegal in the territorial sea. "Innocent passage" is defined by the convention as passing through waters in an expeditious and continuous manner, which is not "prejudicial to the peace, good order or the security" of the coastal state. Fishing, polluting, weapons practice, and spying are not "innocent", and submarines and other underwater vehicles are required to navigate on the surface and to show their flag. Nations can also temporarily suspend innocent passage in specific areas of their territorial sea, if doing so is essential for the protection of their security. * Contiguous zone: Beyond the {{convert|12|nmi|km|adj=on}} limit, there is a further {{convert|12|nmi|km}} from the territorial sea baseline limit, the contiguous zone. Here a state can continue to enforce laws in four specific areas (customs, taxation, immigration, and pollution) if the infringement started or is about to occur within the state's territory or territorial waters.<ref>{{cite web|title=SECTION 4. CONTIGUOUS ZONE, Article 33|url=https://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/part2.htm|work=UNCLOS PART II – TERRITORIAL SEA AND CONTIGUOUS ZONE|publisher=United Nations|access-date=19 January 2012|archive-date=23 May 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210523020808/https://www.un.org/Depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/part2.htm|url-status=live}}</ref> This makes the contiguous zone a hot pursuit area. * Exclusive economic zones: These extend {{convert|200|nmi|km mi|abbr=on}} from the baseline. Within this area, the coastal nation has sole exploitation rights over all natural resources. In casual use, the term may include the territorial sea and even the continental shelf. The EEZs were introduced to halt the increasingly heated clashes over fishing rights, although oil was also becoming important. The success of an offshore oil platform in the Gulf of Mexico in 1947 was soon repeated elsewhere in the world, and by 1970 it was technically feasible to operate in waters {{convert|4000|m}} deep. Foreign nations have the freedom of navigation and overflight, subject to the regulation of the coastal states. Foreign states may also lay submarine pipes and cables. * Continental shelf: The continental shelf is defined as the natural prolongation of the land territory to the continental margin's outer edge, or {{convert|200|nmi|km}} from the coastal state's baseline, whichever is greater. A state's continental shelf may exceed {{convert|200|nmi|km}} until the natural prolongation ends. However, it may never exceed {{convert|350|nmi|km mi|abbr=on}} from the baseline; nor may it exceed {{convert|100|nmi|km mi|abbr=on}} beyond the {{convert|2500|m}} isobath (the line connecting the depth of 2 500 m). Coastal states have the right to harvest mineral and non-living material in the subsoil of their continental shelf, to the exclusion of others. Coastal states also have exclusive control over living resources "attached" to the continental shelf, but not to creatures living in the water column beyond the exclusive economic zone.
The water column outside these areas is referred to as the "high seas", and the seabed is referred to as "the Area".<ref>United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Dec. 10, 1982, 1833 U.N.T.S. 397<nowiki/>https://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/unclos_e.pdf</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Documents and Publications |url=http://www.isa.org.jm/en/documents |publisher=International Seabed Authority|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080513045513/http://www.isa.org.jm/en/documents |archive-date=13 May 2008 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Jon Copley |title=Deep-sea mining is making the seabed the hottest real estate on Earth |journal=New Scientist |date=7 November 2020 |url=https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg24833070-700-deep-sea-mining-is-making-the-seabed-the-hottest-real-estate-on-earth/ |access-date=8 November 2020 |archive-date=28 April 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210428214041/https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg24833070-700-deep-sea-mining-is-making-the-seabed-the-hottest-real-estate-on-earth/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
Aside from its provisions defining ocean boundaries, the convention establishes general obligations for safeguarding the marine environment and protecting freedom of scientific research on the high seas, and also creates an innovative legal regime for controlling mineral resource exploitation in deep seabed areas beyond national jurisdiction, through an International Seabed Authority and the common heritage of mankind principle.<ref>Jennifer Frakes, The Common Heritage of Mankind Principle and the Deep Seabed, Outer Space, and Antarctica: Will Developed and Developing Nations Reach a Compromise? Wisconsin International Law Journal. 2003; 21:409</ref>
The convention also established the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS) in Hamburg, Germany.<ref>{{Cite web |title=International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: The Tribunal |url=https://www.itlos.org/en/main/the-tribunal/the-tribunal/ |access-date=29 July 2024 |website=www.itlos.org}}</ref>
Landlocked states are given a right of access to and from the sea, without taxation of traffic through transit states.<ref>This principle was developed in the Convention on Transit Trade of Land-locked States.</ref>
== Part XI and the 1994 Agreement == {{Admiralty law}} Part XI of the convention provides for a regime relating to minerals on the seabed outside any state's territorial waters or exclusive economic zones (EEZ). It establishes an International Seabed Authority (ISA) to authorize seabed exploration and mining and collect and distribute the seabed mining royalty.
On 1 February 2011, the Seabed Disputes Chamber of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS) issued an advisory opinion concerning the legal responsibilities and obligations of states parties to the convention with respect to the sponsorship of activities in the area in accordance with Part XI of the convention and the 1994 agreement.<ref>[http://www.itlos.org/fileadmin/itlos/documents/cases/case_no_17/adv_op_010211.pdf Case No. 17 – Responsibilities and Obligations of States Sponsoring Persons and Entities With Respect to Activities in the Area – Advisory Opinion] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110927215642/http://www.itlos.org/fileadmin/itlos/documents/cases/case_no_17/adv_op_010211.pdf |date=27 September 2011 }}, Seabed Disputes Chamber of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (1 February 2011)</ref> The advisory opinion was issued in response to a formal request made by the International Seabed Authority following two prior applications the authority's Legal and Technical Commission had received from the Republic of Nauru and the Kingdom of Tonga regarding proposed activities (a plan of work to explore for polymetallic nodules) to be undertaken in the area by two state-sponsored contractors – Nauru Ocean Resources Inc. (sponsored by the Republic of Nauru) and Tonga Offshore Mining Ltd. (sponsored by the Kingdom of Tonga). The advisory opinion set forth the international legal responsibilities and obligations of sponsoring states and the authority to ensure that sponsored activities do not harm the marine environment, consistent with the applicable provisions of UNCLOS Part XI, Authority regulations, ITLOS case law, other international environmental treaties, and Principle 15 of the UN Rio Declaration.<ref>[http://itssdjournalunclos-lost.blogspot.com/2011/03/international-tribunal-on-law-of-sea.html International Tribunal on the Law of the Sea Finally Renders Advisory Opinion Establishing that the Precautionary Principle is Incorporated Within UNCLOS Law] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210417142304/http://itssdjournalunclos-lost.blogspot.com/2011/03/international-tribunal-on-law-of-sea.html |date=17 April 2021 }}, ''ITSSD Journal on the UN Law of the Sea Convention'' (22 March 2011)</ref>
== Part XII – Protecting the marine environment ==
Part XII of UNCLOS contains special provisions for the protection of the marine environment, obligating all states to collaborate in this matter, as well as placing special obligations on flag states to ensure that ships under their flags adhere to international environmental regulations, often adopted by the IMO. The MARPOL convention is an example of such regulation. Part XII also bestows coastal and port states with broadened jurisdictional rights for enforcing international environmental regulation within their territory and on the high seas.<ref>Jesper Jarl Fanø (2019). ''Enforcing International Maritime Legislation on Air Pollution through UNCLOS''. Hart Publishing.</ref>
== High Seas Treaty ==
{{See also|High seas fisheries management#Agreement on biodiversity beyond national jurisdiction (BBNJ Treaty)}} {{Infobox Treaty | name = BBNJ Agreement | long_name = Agreement under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Marine Biological Diversity of Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction | image = Flag of the United Nations.png | image_width = | type = International legally binding instrument | date_drafted = 4 March 2023 | date_signed = 20 September 2023 | location_signed = New York | date_sealed = | date_effective = | condition_effective = Ratification by 60 states | date_expiration = | signatories = 110 countries<ref>{{cite web|url=https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=XXI-10&chapter=21&clang=_en&_gl=1*54w05o*_ga*MTIwNTg5ODExNS4xNjk1NjkwNzM1*_ga_TK9BQL5X7Z*MTY5NTY5MDczNC4xLjEuMTY5NTY5MjE2OS4wLjAuMA..|title=Status of the Agreement under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Marine Biological Diversity of Areas beyond National Jurisdiction - list of signatories|access-date=20 February 2025|publisher=United Nations}}</ref> | parties = (17) Bangladesh, Barbados, Belize, Chile, Cuba, France, Maldives, Mauritius, Federated States of Micronesia, Monaco, Palau, Panama, Seychelles, Singapore, Spain, St. Lucia, Timor-Leste | depositor = | language = | languages = | footnotes = | wikisource = }} {{excerpt|High Seas Treaty}}
== Parties == {{main|List of parties to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea}}
[[File:United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea parties.svg|thumb|{{legend|#92c5de|Parties}} {{legend|#0571b0|Parties, dually represented by the European Union}} {{legend|#ff6600|Signatories}} {{legend|#ca0020|Non-parties}}]]
The convention was opened for signature on 10 December 1982 and entered into force on 16 November 1994 upon deposition of the 60th instrument of ratification.<ref name="history"/> The convention has been ratified by 172 parties, which includes 168 UN member states, one UN Observer state (Palestine), two non-member states (the Cook Islands and Niue) and the European Union.<ref name=rat/>
===Role=== The significance of UNCLOS stems from the fact that it systemizes and codifies the standards and principles of international maritime law, which are based on centuries of maritime experience and are expressed to a great extent in the United Nations Charter and current international maritime law norms, such as the Geneva Conventions of 1958. A large portion of these requirements were further strengthened and expanded.<ref>capt. Enchev, V. (2012), Fundamentals of Maritime Law {{ISBN|978-954-8991-69-8}}</ref>
== See also == {{International ownership conventions}} {{div col|colwidth=30em}} * {{Annotated link |Automatic identification system}} * {{Annotated link |International Seabed Authority}} * {{Annotated link |International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea}} * {{Annotated link |Law of the sea}} * {{Annotated link |Law of salvage}} * {{Annotated link |Maritime Security Regimes}} * {{Annotated link |Montreux Convention Regarding the Regime of the Straits}} * {{Annotated link |Seabed Arms Control Treaty}} * {{Annotated link |United States and the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea}} * {{Annotated link |US/USSR Joint Statement on Uniform Acceptance of Rules of International Law Governing Innocent Passage}} * {{Annotated link |Virginia Commentary}} {{div col end}} {{Portalbar|Law|Oceans|Transport|Politics}}
== References == {{Reflist}}
== Further reading == * Enyew, Endalew Lijalem (2022). "[https://academic.oup.com/chinesejil/article/21/3/439/6833174 Sailing with TWAIL: A Historical Inquiry into Third World Perspectives on the Law of the Sea]". 21(3) ''Chinese Journal of International Law.'' * Sara McLaughlin Mitchell and Andrew P. Owsiak (2021). "[https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-journal-of-international-law/article/judicialization-of-the-sea-bargaining-in-the-shadow-of-unclos/1E7BDAEB4A62B1A43E5AB3456344B4F7 Judicialization of the Sea: Bargaining in the Shadow of UNCLOS]." ''American Journal of International Law''.
== External links == {{Wikisource}} * [https://www.un.org/Depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/closindx.htm Text of the treaty] [https://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/unclos_e.pdf (PDF)] * [https://www.un.org/Depts/los/reference_files/chronological_lists_of_ratifications.htm List of countries that have ratified Law of the Sea Conventions] * [http://www.itlos.org/ International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea] * [https://web.archive.org/web/20090307100642/http://www.pca-cpa.org/showpage.asp?pag_id=1029 Permanent Court of Arbitration – Past and Pending Cases] * [https://web.archive.org/web/20100628141933/http://www.brill.nl/default.aspx?partid=210 Decisions of the World Court Relevant to the UNCLOS (2010)] and [http://www.uu.nl/nilos/books Contents & Indexes]{{dead link|date=December 2017 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }} * [https://www.un.org/Depts/los/index.htm United Nations Division for Ocean Affairs and the Law of the Sea] * [https://www.un.org/Depts/los/clcs_new/clcs_home.htm UN Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf] * {{cite web |url= http://www.iho.int/iho_pubs/CB/C-51_Ed4-EN.pdf |title= Technical aspects of the UN Law of the Sea |access-date= 12 September 2011 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20130524163050/http://www.iho.int/iho_pubs/CB/C-51_Ed4-EN.pdf |archive-date= 24 May 2013 |url-status= dead }} {{small|(4.89 MB)}} * [https://web.archive.org/web/20040807100300/http://www.continentalshelf.org/ UNEP Shelf Programme, UN organisation set up to assist States in delineating their continental shelf beyond 200 nautical miles (370 km)] * [https://web.archive.org/web/20081019095511/http://web.unimc.it/internazionale/sea.htm UNCLOS Italian Database] * [https://web.archive.org/web/20061229231026/http://seaaroundus.org/eez/eez.aspx EEZ/CS Boundaries Canadian Database] * [http://www.marineregions.org/sources.php#eez Digital Map of the World's Exclusive Economic Zones] * [http://www.sopac.org/tiki-index.php?page=Pacific+Island+Regional+Maritime+Boundaries+Project SOPAC Maritime Boundaries Database]{{dead link|date=January 2018 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }} * [https://web.archive.org/web/20131017052018/http://legal.un.org/avl/ha/gclos/gclos.html Introductory note by Tullio Treves], procedural history note and audiovisual material on the ''1958 Geneva Conventions on the Law of the Sea'' in the [http://legal.un.org/avl/historicarchives.html Historic Archives of the United Nations Audiovisual Library of International Law] * [http://legal.un.org/avl/ha/uncls/uncls.html Introductory note by Tullio Treves], procedural history note and audiovisual material on the ''United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea'' in the [http://legal.un.org/avl/historicarchives.html Historic Archives of the United Nations Audiovisual Library of International Law]
{{Law of the sea}} {{Authority control}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Law of the Sea Convention}} * Category:1982 in Jamaica Category:1994 in the environment United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea Category:Treaties entered into by the European Union United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea Category:Treaties establishing intergovernmental organizations Category:Treaties extended to Anguilla Category:Treaties extended to Aruba Category:Treaties extended to Bermuda Category:Treaties extended to Gibraltar Category:Treaties extended to Greenland Category:Treaties extended to Guernsey Category:Treaties extended to Jersey Category:Treaties extended to Montserrat Category:Treaties extended to Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha Category:Treaties extended to South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands Category:Treaties extended to the British Antarctic Territory Category:Treaties extended to the British Indian Ocean Territory Category:Treaties extended to the British Virgin Islands Category:Treaties extended to the Cayman Islands Category:Treaties extended to the Falkland Islands Category:Treaties extended to the Faroe Islands Category:Treaties extended to the Isle of Man Category:Treaties extended to the Netherlands Antilles Category:Treaties extended to the Pitcairn Islands Category:Treaties extended to the Turks and Caicos Islands Category:Treaties of Albania Category:Treaties of Algeria Category:Treaties of Antigua and Barbuda Category:Treaties of Argentina Category:Treaties of Armenia Category:Treaties of Australia Category:Treaties of Austria Category:Treaties of Azerbaijan Category:Treaties of Ba'athist Iraq Category:Treaties of Bahrain Category:Treaties of Bangladesh Category:Treaties of Barbados Category:Treaties of Belarus Category:Treaties of Belgium Category:Treaties of Belize Category:Treaties of Benin Category:Treaties of Bolivia Category:Treaties of Bosnia and Herzegovina Category:Treaties of Botswana Category:Treaties of Brazil Category:Treaties of Brunei Category:Treaties of Bulgaria Category:Treaties of Burkina Faso Category:Treaties of Cameroon Category:Treaties of Canada Category:Treaties of Cape Verde Category:Treaties of Chad Category:Treaties of Chile Category:Treaties of Costa Rica Category:Treaties of Croatia Category:Treaties of Cuba Category:Treaties of Cyprus Category:Treaties of Denmark Category:Treaties of Djibouti Category:Treaties of Dominica Category:Treaties of East Germany Category:Treaties of Ecuador Category:Treaties of Egypt Category:Treaties of Equatorial Guinea Category:Treaties of Estonia Category:Treaties of Eswatini Category:Treaties of Fiji Category:Treaties of Finland Category:Treaties of France Category:Treaties of Gabon Category:Treaties of Germany Category:Treaties of Ghana Category:Treaties of Greece Category:Treaties of Grenada Category:Treaties of Guatemala Category:Treaties of Guinea-Bissau Category:Treaties of Guinea Category:Treaties of Guyana Category:Treaties of Haiti Category:Treaties of Honduras Category:Treaties of Hungary Category:Treaties of Iceland Category:Treaties of India Category:Treaties of Indonesia Category:Treaties of Ireland Category:Treaties of Italy Category:Treaties of Ivory Coast Category:Treaties of Jamaica Category:Treaties of Japan Category:Treaties of Jordan Category:Treaties of Kenya Category:Treaties of Kiribati Category:Treaties of Kuwait Category:Treaties of Laos Category:Treaties of Latvia Category:Treaties of Lebanon Category:Treaties of Lesotho Category:Treaties of Liberia Category:Treaties of Lithuania Category:Treaties of Luxembourg Category:Treaties of Madagascar Category:Treaties of Malawi Category:Treaties of Malaysia Category:Treaties of Mali Category:Treaties of Malta Category:Treaties of Mauritania Category:Treaties of Mauritius Category:Treaties of Mexico Category:Treaties of Moldova Category:Treaties of Monaco Category:Treaties of Mongolia Category:Treaties of Montenegro Category:Treaties of Morocco Category:Treaties of Mozambique Category:Treaties of Myanmar Category:Treaties of Namibia Category:Treaties of Nauru Category:Treaties of Nepal Category:Treaties of New Zealand Category:Treaties of Nicaragua Category:Treaties of Niger Category:Treaties of Nigeria Category:Treaties of North Macedonia Category:Treaties of Norway Category:Treaties of Oman Category:Treaties of Pakistan Category:Treaties of Palau Category:Treaties of Palestine Category:Treaties of Panama Category:Treaties of Papua New Guinea Category:Treaties of Paraguay Category:Treaties of Poland Category:Treaties of Portugal Category:Treaties of Qatar Category:Treaties of Romania Category:Treaties of Russia Category:Treaties of Saint Kitts and Nevis Category:Treaties of Saint Lucia Category:Treaties of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Category:Treaties of Samoa Category:Treaties of San Marino Category:Treaties of Saudi Arabia Category:Treaties of Senegal Category:Treaties of Serbia and Montenegro Category:Treaties of Seychelles Category:Treaties of Sierra Leone Category:Treaties of Singapore Category:Treaties of Slovakia Category:Treaties of Slovenia Category:Treaties of South Africa Category:Treaties of South Korea Category:Treaties of Spain Category:Treaties of Sri Lanka Category:Treaties of Suriname Category:Treaties of Sweden Category:Treaties of Switzerland Category:Treaties of São Tomé and Príncipe Category:Treaties of Tanzania Category:Treaties of Thailand Category:Treaties of Timor-Leste Category:Treaties of Togo Category:Treaties of Tonga Category:Treaties of Trinidad and Tobago Category:Treaties of Tunisia Category:Treaties of Tuvalu Category:Treaties of Uganda Category:Treaties of Ukraine Category:Treaties of Uruguay Category:Treaties of Vanuatu Category:Treaties of Vietnam Category:Treaties of Yugoslavia Category:Treaties of Zaire Category:Treaties of Zambia Category:Treaties of Zimbabwe Category:Treaties of the Bahamas Category:Treaties of the Comoros Category:Treaties of the Cook Islands Category:Treaties of the Czech Republic Category:Treaties of the Democratic Republic of the Sudan Category:Treaties of the Dominican Republic Category:Treaties of the Federated States of Micronesia Category:Treaties of the Gambia Category:Treaties of the Maldives Category:Treaties of the Marshall Islands Category:Treaties of the Netherlands Category:Treaties of the People's Republic of Angola Category:Treaties of the People's Republic of China Category:Treaties of the Philippines Category:Treaties of the Republic of the Congo Category:Treaties of the Solomon Islands Category:Treaties of the Somali Democratic Republic Category:Treaties of the United Kingdom Category:Treaties of the Yemen Arab Republic Convention on the Law of the Sea