{{Short description|Feature found in sedimentary rocks}}
'''Omars''', are a distinctive type of glacial erratic that consists of dark siliceous greywacke and exhibits prominent rounded, often deep, hemispherical voids and pits. The hemispherical voids and pits result from the selective dissolution of carbonate concretions within the greywacke. The greywacke is identifiable by its low metamorphic grade and the 10–40% rock fragments, distinctive volcanic clasts, and spherical carbonate concretions that it contains. Omars are typically rounded and range in size from pebbles to boulders. Their rounded shape, whether found in glacial tills or glacial-fluvial (outwash) gravels, indicate that they were eroded from pre-existing littoral or fluvial deposits. Omars are typically found associated with granules and pebbles of oolitic jasper that were transported from the Belcher Islands in Hudson Bay, Canada.<ref name="DonaldsonOthers1997a">Donaldson, A. and V.K. Prest (1997) ''Criteria for recognizing omars, widely dispersed indicators of Pleistocene history in North America.'' GAC/MAC Abs. 22:40, Ottawa.</ref><ref name="PrestOthers2000a">Prest, V.K., J.A. Donaldson, and H.D. Mooers (2000) ''The omar story: the role of omars in assessing glacial history of west-central North America.'' Géographie Physique et Quaternaire 54(3):257-270.</ref><ref name="MooersOthers1998a">Mooers, H.D., and J.D. Lehr (1998) ''Terrestrial record of Laurentide Ice Sheet reorganization during Heinrich events: Reply.'' Geology. 26(7):668-669.</ref>
The name given these glacial erratics refer to their source, which is the Proterozoic Omarolluk Formation in the Belcher Islands in southeast Hudson Bay. The Laurentide Ice Sheet eroded omars from the Belcher Islands, an archipelago limited to only about a quarter of 1% of Hudson Bay. Glaciers moved omars from the southeastern part of Hudson Bay to central Canada and into the U.S. where they were deposited on moraines. Because scientists know precisely where they came from they are very valuable in documenting the movement of glaciers.<ref name="PrestOthers2000a"/><ref name="Dutchnda">Dutch, S. (n.d.) [http://www.uwgb.edu/dutchs/Petrology/Leaverite-SedFeat.HTM ''Leaverites - Features in Sedimentary Rocks.''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100603142516/http://www.uwgb.edu/dutchs/Petrology/Leaverite-SedFeat.HTM |date=2010-06-03 }} Natural and Applied Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Green Bay, Wisconsin Downloaded October 28, 2009</ref><ref name="Wilson2007a">Wilson, G. (2007) [http://www.turnstone.ca/rom74om.htm ''An omar (siltstone erratic).''] Turnstone Geological Services Ltd, Campbellford, Ontario, Canada. Downloaded October 28, 2009</ref>
== Etymology == There is uncertainty on how to translate the proper name Omarolluk (and omar rocks). According to the records of the Canada Centre for Mapping and Earth Observation Natural Resources, the features Omarolluk Sound and Omarolluk Formation were named after Omarolluk, an Inuk man who accompanied and guided R. J. Flaherty on numerous geological surveys of the Belcher Islands and elsewhere in the Canadian north. He was probably an Inuktitut-dialect speaker from the eastern coast of Hudson Bay. The spelling likely varied from the originally pronounced but unrecorded aural form of the name. Despite the expected natural-feature designations, Omarolluk was surely an actual person. There are three possible translations, as follows: (1) Best: In the subdialect (Itivimiut) of the Nunavik dialect of Inuktitut, the phoneme /j/ was and still is up to a point pronounced more or less like English ''r'' and generally transcribed as such, and so the name in the standard Canadian Inuit spelling might have been *''Uumajurluk'' (pronounced /uumaruRluk/: ''r'' = English ''r''; ''R'' = French ''r''), that is, ‘bad animal’ (''uumajuq'' ‘animal’; ''luk'' ‘bad’) as a guess.<ref>Louis-Jacques Dorais, pers. comm., 16 January 2019</ref> (2) Somewhat similar but possibly: ‘poor reason for being alive’, ''uumaq-jjut-luk'' ‘be.alive–reason.for/cause.for–bad/poor’ (-''jjut'' takes the form -''rut'' after the uvular [q] and then deletes it, at least in the contemporary language). The initial ''o'' is dubious for an expected ''u''.<ref>Anonymous supplied through Marguerite Mackenzie, 15 January 2019</ref> (3) A distant Yup’ik possibility if applied to a rock stratum: ''Umaq'' is a seam between the upper and lower parts of a ''kamik'' (sealskin boot); the ''ruq'' part would mean ‘to become’, and ''luk'' is the ‘it’, thus imperfectly ‘it becomes a seam’, but if ''umaaq'', then it becomes ‘rip (at the seam)’, a verb, which would mean something like ‘it has a habit of ripping at the seam’.<ref>Michael Arvaarluk Kusugak, Vancouver Island, 7 January 2019</ref><ref>Supplied by Carl Masthay, St. Louis, Missouri, 28 January 2019</ref>
== See also == * Adder stone, Eurasian natural rocks with holes. * Cupstone, true Native American artifacts. * Pholad borings, similar rock holes caused by certain types of bivalves. * Lithic technology
==References== <references/> Prest, V.K. (1990) Laurentide ice-flow patterns: A historical review, and implications of the dispersal of Belcher Island erratics. Géographie Physique et Quaternaire 44(2):113-136. {{Prehistoric technology}}
Category:Sedimentology