{{Short description|Archaeological industry of the European Upper Paleolithic}} {{See also|Prehistoric Europe}} {{Use dmy dates|date=March 2025}} {{Infobox archaeological culture |name = Gravettian<br/><small>(33,000–22,000 BP)</small> |map = {{multiple image|perrow=2/1/1|total_width=302|caption_align=center | align = center | border=none | direction =horizontal | image1 = Female face, ivory carving, Dolní Věstonice, Gravettian, 28 000 - 22 000 BP.jpg | image2=Venus_of_Willendorf_frontview_retouched_2.jpg | image3=Engraving on a mammoth tusk, map, Gravettian (detail).jpg | footer=Left: Female face, ivory carving, Dolní Věstonice, Gravettian, circa 26,000 BP. Right: Venus of Willendorf, circa 25,000 BP. Middle: Engraving on a mammoth tusk. Bottom: Main Gravettian sites }} |mapsize = 350 |mapalt = |altnames = |horizon = |region = Europe |period = Upper Paleolithic |dates = 33,000<ref name="Jacobi2009"/> to 21,000 BP{{is this date calibrated?|date=August 2018}}{{efn|name=Note a|The transition to the Epigravettian is not well-defined, and the Gravettian may be extended down to 17,000 years ago with the most inclusive definition, based on anything that may be considered Gravettian (burials, venus statues, lithics)<ref name=Pesesse>{{cite encyclopedia |last= Pesesse|first= Damien|editor = Marcel Otte|editor-link = Marcel Otte|encyclopedia= Les Gravettiens|title= Le Gravettien existe-t-il? Le prisme du système technique lithique|trans-title= Does the Gravettian exist? The prism of the lithic technical system|language=fr|year= 2013|publisher= Éditions errance|series= Civilisations et cultures|location=Paris|isbn= 978-2877725095|pages=66–104 |quote= ''D'ailleurs selon les auteurs et les thèmes abordés, la définition et donc les contours du Gravettien variant, parfois considérablement. Tantôt certains ensembles de la plaine russe seront intégrés sur la base des témoignages funéraires, tantôt les statuettes féminines serviront d'argument pour annexer les rives du lac Baïkal à cette supra-entité. De même, le Gravettien débuterait vers 31,000 BP ou 27,000 BP selon les régions pour finir parfois à 22,000 BP, parfois à 17,000 BP. Ce ne sont pas là de menues différences.'' [Besides, depending on the authors and the subjects at hand, the definition and therefore the borders of the Gravettian vary, sometimes considerably. Sometimes, certain assemblages of the Russian plains are integrated on the basis of funerary customs, other times feminine statuettes are used to annex the shores of Lake Baikal to this supra-entity. Likewise, the Gravettian would start around 31,000 or 27,000 BP depending on the region and finish sometimes at 22,000 BP, sometimes at 17,000 BP. These are not small differences.]}}</ref>}} |typesite = La Gravette |majorsites = Dordogne |extra = Venus figurines |precededby = Aurignacian |followedby = Solutrean, Epigravettian |definedby = Dorothy Garrod, 1938<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1017/S0079497X00021113 |title=The Upper Palaeolithic in the Light of Recent Discovery |journal=Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society |volume=4 |issue=1 |pages=1–26 |year=2014 |last1=Garrod |first1=D. A. E. |s2cid=4041425 }}</ref> }} <mapframe text="Selected Gravettian sites from the [https://www.roceeh.uni-tuebingen.de/roadweb ROAD database] (CC BY-SA 4.0 ROCEEH)"width="350", height="300"> { "type": "ExternalData", "service": "page", "title": "ROCEEH/Gravettian.map" } </mapframe> The '''Gravettian''' is an archaeological industry of the European Upper Paleolithic that succeeded the Aurignacian circa 33,000 years BP.<ref name="Jacobi2009">{{cite journal |doi=10.1017/S0003598X00099749 |title=Radiocarbon chronology for the Early Gravettian of northern Europe: New AMS determinations for Maisières-Canal, Belgium |journal=Antiquity |volume=84 |issue=323 |pages=26–40 |year=2015 |last1=Jacobi |first1=R.M. |last2=Higham |first2=T.F.G. |last3=Haesaerts |first3=P. |last4=Jadin |first4=I. |last5=Basell |first5=L.S. |s2cid=163089681 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1126/science.1219957 |pmid=22700921 |title=U-Series Dating of Paleolithic Art in 11 Caves in Spain |journal=Science |volume=336 |issue=6087 |pages=1409–13 |year=2012 |last1=Pike |first1=A. W. G. |last2=Hoffmann |first2=D. L. |last3=Garcia-Diez |first3=M. |last4=Pettitt |first4=P. B. |last5=Alcolea |first5=J. |last6=De Balbin |first6=R. |last7=Gonzalez-Sainz |first7=C. |last8=De Las Heras |first8=C. |last9=Lasheras |first9=J. A. |last10=Montes |first10=R. |last11=Zilhao |first11=J. |bibcode=2012Sci...336.1409P |s2cid=7807664 |url=https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1498254 }}</ref> It is archaeologically the last European culture many consider unified,<ref>{{cite encyclopedia |last= Noiret|first= Pierre|editor = Marcel Otte|editor-link = Marcel Otte|encyclopedia= Les Gravettiens|title= De quoi Gravettien est-il le nom?|trans-title= Gravettian is the name of what?|language=fr|year= 2013|publisher= Éditions errance|series= Civilisations et cultures|location=Paris|isbn= 978-2877725095|pages=28–64}}</ref> and had mostly disappeared by {{circa}} 22,000 BP, close to the Last Glacial Maximum, although some elements lasted until {{circa}} 17,000 BP.<ref name=Pesesse/> In modern-day Portugal, Spain and France, it was succeeded by the Solutrean and by the Epigravettian in Italy, the Balkans, Ukraine<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1016/j.jas.2011.09.008 |title=Charcoal scarcity in Epigravettian settlements with mammoth bone dwellings: The taphonomic evidence from Mezhyrich (Ukraine) |journal=Journal of Archaeological Science |volume=39 |issue=1 |pages=109–20 |year=2012 |last1=Marquer |first1=L. |last2=Lebreton |first2=V. |last3=Otto |first3=T. |last4=Valladas |first4=H. |last5=Haesaerts |first5=P. |last6=Messager |first6=E. |last7=Nuzhnyi |first7=D. |last8=Péan |first8=S. |bibcode=2012JArSc..39..109M }}</ref> and Russia.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1016/j.jaa.2008.07.003 |title=Possible evidence of mammoth hunting during the Epigravettian at Yudinovo, Russian Plain |journal=Journal of Anthropological Archaeology |volume=27 |issue=4 |pages=475–92 |year=2008 |last1=Germonpré |first1=Mietje |last2=Sablin |first2=Mikhail |last3=Khlopachev |first3=Gennady Adolfovich |last4=Grigorieva |first4=Galina Vasilievna }}</ref>
The Gravettian culture is known for their artistic works including the famous Venus figurines, which were typically carved from either ivory or limestone. The culture was first identified at the site of La Gravette in the southwestern French department of Dordogne.<ref name="Kipfer">Kipfer, Barbara Ann. "Encyclopedic Dictionary of Archaeology". Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 2000. P. 216. {{ISBN|978-0-3064-6158-3}}</ref> While historically assumed to represent a genetically homogenous group, recent analysis of ancient DNA sequences suggests that the Gravettian was produced by multiple genetically divergent groups of hunter-gatherers. Eastern Gravettian-producing groups belong to the Věstonice cluster, while western Gravettian-producing groups belong to the Fournol cluster, both of which have genetic continuity from producers of the earlier Aurignacian. Fournol cluster-related groups are thought to be the ancestors of the producers of the following Solutrean and Magdalenian cultures present in Western Europe after the Last Glacial Maximum, while the producers of the Epigravettian are genetically distinct from Gravettian-producing groups.<ref name=":0" />
==Gravettian culture== [[File:Moravianska venusa.jpg|thumb|left|150px|The Venus of Moravany, made of mammoth tusk ivory]] The Gravettians were hunter-gatherers who lived in a bitterly cold period of European prehistory, and the Gravettian lifestyle was shaped by the climate. Pleniglacial environmental changes forced them to adapt. West and Central Europe were extremely cold during this period. Archaeologists usually describe two regional variants: the western Gravettian, known mainly from cave sites in France, Spain and Britain, and the eastern Gravettian in Central Europe and Russia. The eastern Gravettians, which include the Pavlovian culture, were specialized mammoth hunters,<ref name="Kipfer" /> whose remains are usually found not in caves but in open air sites.
Gravettian culture thrived on their ability to hunt animals. They utilized a variety of tools and hunting strategies. Compared to theorized hunting techniques of Neanderthals and earlier human groups, Gravettian hunting culture appears much more mobile and complex. They lived in caves or semi-subterranean or rounded dwellings which were typically arranged in small "villages". Gravettians are thought to have been innovative in the development of tools such as blunted-back knives, tanged arrowheads and boomerangs.<ref name="Kipfer" /> Other innovations include the use of woven nets and oil lamps made of stone.<ref name="bains">Bains, Gurnek. "Cultural DNA: The Psychology of Globalization". John Wiley & Sons, 2015. p. 199. {{ISBN|978-1-1189-2891-2}}</ref> Blades and bladelets were used to make decorations and bone tools from animal remains.
Gravettian culture extends across a large geographic region, as far as Estremadura in Portugal.<ref name="Marks">{{cite journal | doi=10.2307/530244 | author=Marks, Anthony E., Bicho, Nuno, Zilhao, Joao, Ferring, C. R. | title=Upper Pleistocene Prehistory in Portuguese Estremadura: Results of Preliminary Research| year=1994| journal=Journal of Field Archaeology | volume=21 | issue=1 | pages=53–68 | jstor=530244}}</ref> but is relatively homogeneous until about 27,000 BP.<ref name="De Laet">De Laet, S.J. "History of Humanity: Prehistory and the beginnings of civilization". United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultura, 1994. p. 212. {{ISBN|978-9-2310-2810-6}}</ref> They developed burial rites,<ref name="bains" /> which included simple, purpose-built offerings and/or personal ornaments owned by the deceased, placed within the grave or tomb.<ref name="Renfrew">Renfrew, Colin. "Death Rituals, Social Order and the Archaeology of Immortality in the Ancient World: 'Death Shall Have No Dominion'". Cambridge University Press, 2018. p. 58. {{ISBN|978-1-1070-8273-1}}</ref> Surviving Gravettian art includes numerous cave paintings and small, portable Venus figurines made from clay or ivory, as well as jewelry objects. The fertility deities mostly date from the early period; there are over 100 known surviving examples. They conform to a very specific physical type, with large breasts, broad hips and prominent posteriors. The statuettes tend to lack facial details, and their limbs are often broken off.<ref name="De Laet" />
During the post glacial period, evidence of the culture begins to disappear from northern Europe but was continued in areas around the Mediterranean.<ref name="De Laet" />
The Mal'ta Culture ({{c.|24,000 BP}}) in Siberia is often considered as belonging to the Gravettian,<ref>{{cite book |last1=Nowell |first1=April |title=Growing Up in the Ice Age: Fossil and Archaeological Evidence of the Lived Lives of Plio-Pleistocene Children |date=30 June 2021 |publisher=Oxbow Books |isbn=978-1-78925-297-2 |page=62 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=cxcuEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA62 |language=en|quote="The Gravettian site of Mal'ta..."}}</ref> due to its similar characteristics, particularly its Venus figurines, but any hypothetical connection would have to be cultural and not genetic: a 2016 genomic study showed that the Mal'ta people have no genetic connections with the people of the European Gravettian culture (the Vestonice Cluster).<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Fu |first1=Qiaomei |last2=Posth |first2=Cosimo |last3=Hajdinjak |first3=Mateja |title=The genetic history of Ice Age Europe |journal=Nature |volume=504 |issue=7606 |pages=200–5 |date=2 May 2016 |doi=10.1038/nature17993 |pmid=27135931 |pmc=4943878 |display-authors=2 |bibcode=2016Natur.534..200F|hdl=10211.3/198594|quote="Thus, while individuals assigned to the Gravettian cultural complex in Europe are associated with the Vestonice Cluster, there is no genetic connection between them and the Mal’ta individual in Siberia despite the fact that Venus figurines are associated with both. This suggests that if this similarity is not a coincidence, it reflects diffusion of ideas rather than movements of people."}}</ref>
==Diet== [[File:Venus_of_Brassempouy.jpg|thumb|The Lady of Brassempouy from the Western Gravettian]] Animals were a primary food source for humans of the Gravettian period.<ref name="Schulting">{{cite journal | author=Schulting, R.J., Trinkaus, E., Higham, T., Hedges, R., Richards, M. & Cardy, B. | title=A mid-upper Palaeolithic human humerus from eel point, south Wales, UK| year=1997| journal=Journal of Human Evolution | volume=48 | pages=493–505 | pmid=15857652 | issue=5 | doi=10.1016/j.jhevol.2005.02.001| url=https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1565531}}</ref> Since Europe was extremely cold during this period, they preferred food sources high in energy and fat content. Testing comparisons among various human remains reveal that populations at higher latitudes placed greater dietary emphasis on meat. A defining trait distinguishing Gravettian people was their ease of mobility compared to their Neanderthal counterparts. Modern humans developed the technology and social organization that enabled them to migrate with their food source whereas Neanderthals were not adept at travelling, even with relatively sedentary herds.<ref name="Holden">{{cite journal | author=Holden, C. | title=Neandertals and Climate| year=2004| journal=Science | volume=303 | issue=5659| page=759 | doi = 10.1126/science.303.5659.759a | s2cid=220102720}}</ref>
With their ability to move with the herds, Gravettian diets incorporated a broad variety of animal prey. Gravettian diet included larger animals such as mammoths, hyenas, wolves, and reindeer killed with stone or bone tools, as well as hares and foxes captured with nets.<ref name="Net"/> This time period is classified by the strong emphasis on meat consumption because agriculture had not been fully introduced nor utilized. In addition, the climate was not favorable to stable crop cultivation.<ref name="Schulting"/>
Seafood accounted for a significant portion of coastal Gravettians' diet. From remains found in Italy and Wales, isotope analysis reveals that 20–30% of Gravettian diets of coastal peoples consisted of sea animals.<ref name="Pettit">{{Cite journal|url = https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/F762F2C33F994E69A4780AD7AF2DEFE7/S0003598X00061305a.pdf/gravettian_burial_known_as_the_prince_il_principe_new_evidence_for_his_age_and_diet.pdf|title = The Gravettian burial known as the Prince ("Il Principe"): new evidence for his age and diet|last1 = Pettitt|first1 = P.B.|date = 2003|journal = Antiquity|volume = 77|doi = 10.1017/S0003598X00061305|last2 = Richards|first2 = M.|issue = 295|pages = 15|last3 = Maggi|first3 = R.|last4 = Formicola|first4 = V.| s2cid=38461013 |display-authors = 1}}</ref><ref name="Isotope">{{cite journal | author=Jacobi, R., Richards, M., Cook, J., Pettitt, P.B. & Stringer, C.B. | title=Isotope evidence for the intensive use of marine foods by Late Upper Palaeolithic humans | journal=Journal of Human Evolution | year=2005 | volume=49 | issue=3 | pages=390–394 | publisher=Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology | doi=10.1016/j.jhevol.2005.05.002 | pmid=15975629 | bibcode=2005JHumE..49..390R | url=https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1590128 }}</ref> Populations of lower latitudes relied more on shellfish and fish while higher latitudes' diets consisted of seals.<ref name="Isotope"/>
==Physical type== [[File:Sunghir-tumba paleolítica.jpg|thumb|left|Burial with jewellery at Sungir, Russia, {{Circa|30,000 BC}}]] [[File:Sunghir man, forensic reconstruction by M.M. Gerasimov.jpg|thumb|Sunghir man, forensic reconstruction by M.M. Gerasimov|175x175px]]
Physical remains of people of the Gravettian have revealed that they were tall and relatively slender people. The male height of the Gravettian culture ranged between {{convert|179|and|188|cm|ftin}} tall with an average of {{convert|183.5|cm|ftin}}, which is exceptionally tall not only for that period of prehistory, but for all periods of history.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Holt|first1=Brigitte M.|last2=Formicola|first2=Vincenzo|date=2008|title=Hunters of the Ice Age: The biology of Upper Paleolithic people|journal=American Journal of Physical Anthropology|volume=Suppl 47|issue=S47 |pages=70–99|doi=10.1002/ajpa.20950|issn=1096-8644|pmid=19003886|bibcode=2008AJPA..137S..70H |doi-access=free}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Hermanussen|first=Michael|date=July 2003|title=Stature of early Europeans|journal=Hormones|volume=2|issue=3|pages=175–178|doi=10.14310/horm.2002.1199|issn=1109-3099|pmid=17003019|doi-access=free}}</ref>
They were fairly slender and normally weighed between {{convert|67|-|73|kg}}, although they would likely have had a higher ratio of lean muscle mass compared to body fat in comparison to modern humans as a result of a very physically active and demanding lifestyle. The females of the Gravettian were much shorter, standing {{convert|158|cm|ftin}} on average, with an average weight of {{convert|54|kg}}. Examinations of Gravettian skulls reveal that high cheekbones were common among them.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Trinkaus|first1=Erik|last2=Svoboda|first2=Jiřı́|last3=West|first3=Dixie L|last4=Sládek|first4=Vladimı́r|last5=Hillson|first5=Simon W|last6=Drozdová|first6=Eva|last7=Fišáková|first7=Miriam|date=1 December 2000|title=Human Remains from the Moravian Gravettian: Morphology and Taphonomy of Isolated Elements from the Dolnı́ Věstonice II Site|url=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305440399905010|journal=Journal of Archaeological Science|language=en|volume=27|issue=12|pages=1115–1132|doi=10.1006/jasc.1999.0501|bibcode=2000JArSc..27.1115T |issn=0305-4403|url-access=subscription}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Holt|first1=Brigitte M.|last2=Formicola|first2=Vincenzo|date=2008|title=Hunters of the Ice Age: The biology of Upper Paleolithic people|journal=American Journal of Physical Anthropology|language=en|volume=137|issue=S47|pages=70–99|doi=10.1002/ajpa.20950|pmid=19003886 |bibcode=2008AJPA..137S..70H |issn=1096-8644|doi-access=free}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Wilczyński|first=Jarosław|date=January 2015|title=The Gravettian and Epigravettian settlement of Poland|url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284173872|journal=Institute of Archeology of the CAS, Brno & Masaryk University|volume=2|pages=45|via=ResearchGate}}</ref>
==Hunting== thumb|Reconstruction of clothing and bone ornaments.|193x193px Clubs, stones and sticks were the primary hunting tools during the Upper Paleolithic period. Bone, antler and ivory points have all been found at sites in France; but proper stone arrowheads and throwing spears did not appear until the Solutrean period (~20,000 Before Present). Due to the primitive tools, many animals were hunted at close range.<ref name="Straus">{{cite journal | author=Straus, L.G. | title=Upper Paleolithic Hunting Tactics and Weapons in Western Europe | publisher=University of New Mexico | year=1993| journal=Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association | volume=4 | issue=1 | pages=83–93| doi=10.1525/ap3a.1993.4.1.83 }}</ref> The typical artefact of Gravettian industry, once considered diagnostic, is the small pointed blade with a straight blunt back. They are today known as the Gravette point,<ref>Ehrich, Robert W.; Pleslová-Štiková, Emilie. "Aurignacian Lithic Economy: Ecological Perspectives from Southwestern France". Academia, 1968. pp. 37–41</ref> and were used to hunt big game. Gravettians used nets to hunt small game, and are credited with inventing the bow and arrow.<ref name="Kipfer" />{{Citation needed|reason=source unavailable and obsolete, earliest known bows are the Holmegaard Bows, and other archery evidence dates much earlier than the Gravettian|date=November 2020}}
Gravettian settlers tended towards the valleys that pooled migrating prey.<ref name="Straus"/> Examples found through discoveries in Gr. La Gala, a site in Southern Italy, show a strategic settlement based in a small valley.<ref name="Mussi">{{cite book | author=Mussi, M. | title=Earliest Italy: An Overview of the Italian Paleolithic and Mesolithic| url=https://archive.org/details/earliestitalyove00muss | url-access=limited | year=2001| publisher=Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers | pages=[https://archive.org/details/earliestitalyove00muss/page/n268 250]–252| isbn=9780306464638}}</ref> As the settlers became more aware of the migration patterns of animals like red deer, they learned to prey herd in valleys, thereby allowing the hunters to avoid travelling long distances for food. Specifically in Gr. La Gala, the glacial topography forced the deer to pass through the areas in the valley occupied by humans.<ref name="Mussi"/> Additional evidence of strategically positioned settlements include sites like Klithi in Greece, also placed to intercept migrating prey.<ref name="Bogucki">{{cite book | author=Bogucki, P. | title=The Origins of Human Society| year=1999| publisher=Oxford: Blackwell Publications inc. | page=95}}</ref>
Discoveries in the Czech Republic suggest that nets were used to capture large numbers of smaller prey, offering a quick and consistent food supply and thus an alternative to the feast/famine pattern of large game hunters. Evidence comes in the form of {{convert|4|mm|abbr=on}} thick rope preserved on clay imprints.<ref name="Net">{{cite journal | doi=10.1126/science.277.5330.1203 | author=Pringle, H | title=Ice Age Communities May Be Earliest Known Net Hunters| year=1997| journal=Science | volume=277 | issue=5330 | pages=1203–1204| s2cid=128873468 }}</ref> Research suggests that although no larger net imprints have been discovered, there would be little reason for them not to be made as no further knowledge would be required for their creation.<ref name="Net"/> The weaving of nets was likely a communal task, relying on the work of both women and children.<ref name="Net"/>
== Material culture ==
=== Animal remains === thumb|Marks on animal ivory or horn.|184x184px The Gravettian era landscape is most closely related to the landscape of present-day Moravia. Pavlov I in southern Moravia is the most complete and complex Gravettian site presently found and dates back to 26,000 years ago. It provides a perfect model for a general understanding of Gravettian culture. In many instances, animal remains indicate both decorative and utilitarian purposes. In the case of, for example, Arctic foxes, incisors and canines were used for decoration, while their humeri and radii bones were used as tools. Similarly, the skeletons of some red foxes contain decorative incisors and canines as well as ulnas used for awls and barbs.<ref name="Bones">{{cite book | author=Nývltová-Fisáková, M. | chapter=Animal bones selected for tools and decorations| editor=J. Svoboda| title=Pavlov I southeast: A window into the gravettian lifestyles | location=Brno, Czech Republic| publisher=Academy of the Sciences of the Czech Republic, Institute of Archaeology | year=2005| pages=247–251}}</ref>
Some animal bones were only used to create tools. Due to their shape, the ribs, fibulas, and metapodia of horses were good for awl and barb creation. In addition, the ribs were also implemented to create different types of smoothers for pelt preparation. The shapes of hare bones are also unique, and as a result, the ulnas were commonly used as awls and barbs. Reindeer antlers, ulnas, ribs, tibias and teeth were utilised in addition to a rare documented case of a phalanx.<ref name="Bones"/> Mammoth remnants are among the most common bone remnants of the culture, while long bones and molars are also documented. Some mammoth bones were used for decorative purposes. Wolf remains were often used for tool production and decoration.<ref name="Bones"/>
=== Textiles === Also at Pavlov I, negative impressions of woven textiles or basketry have been found on fired clay fragments in ash deposits in and around hearths within dwellings. Radiocarbon dating places them between approximately 26,980-24,870 BP. The four clay impressions show two distinct types of twining: Type I (Open Simple Twining with Z Twist Weft) and Type II (Open Diagonal Twining with S Twist Weft). Both types show technical sophistication, suggesting prior development in fiber technology. The warps measure only 0.073-0.092 mm in diameter for Type I and 0.049-0.065 mm for Type II, with approximately 12 warps per centimeter. Researchers could not determine whether they came from textiles or basketry and so may have been portions of bags, mats, or fully flexible fabrics like clothing. They were likely made with some form of non-heddle frame or loom. While the plant fibers remain unidentified, pollen analysis at the site suggest they could have from the bark of alder and yew trees, or from herbaceous plants like milkweed and nettle.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Adovasio |first1=James M. |last2=Soffer |first2=Olga |last3=Klíma |first3=Bohuslav |date=1996 |title=Upper Palaeolithic fibre technology: interlaced woven finds from Pavlov I, Czech Republic, c. 26,000 years ago |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003598X0008368X/type/journal_article |journal=Antiquity |language=en |volume=70 |issue=269 |pages=526–534 |doi=10.1017/S0003598X0008368X |issn=0003-598X|url-access=subscription }}</ref>
==Genetics== Fu et al. (2016) examined the remains of fourteen Gravettians. The eight males included three samples of Y-chromosomal haplogroup CT, one of I, one IJK, one BT, one C1a2, and one sample of F. Of the fourteen samples of mtDNA, there were thirteen samples of U and one sample of M. The majority of the sample of U belonged to the U5 and U2.{{sfn|Fu|2016}} Teschler et al. (2020) examined the remains of one adult male and two twin boys from a Gravettian site in Austria. All belonged to haplogroup Y-Haplogroup I.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Teschler-Nicola|first1=Maria|last2=Fernandes|first2=Daniel|last3=Händel|first3=Marc|last4=Einwögerer|first4=Thomas|last5=Simon|first5=Ulrich|last6=Neugebauer-Maresch|first6=Christine|last7=Tangl|first7=Stefan|last8=Heimel|first8=Patrick|last9=Dobsak|first9=Toni|last10=Retzmann|first10=Anika|last11=Prohaska|first11=Thomas|date=6 November 2020|title=Ancient DNA reveals monozygotic newborn twins from the Upper Palaeolithic|journal=Communications Biology|language=en|volume=3|issue=1|page=650 |doi=10.1038/s42003-020-01372-8|pmid=33159107 | pmc=7648643 |issn=2399-3642|doi-access=free}}</ref> and all had the same mtDNA, U5. According to Scorrano et al. (2022), "the genome of an early European individual from Kostenki 14, dated to around 37,000 years ago, demonstrated that the ancestral European gene pool was already established by that time."<ref>{{cite journal|journal=Communications Biology|volume=5|title=Genomic ancestry, diet and microbiomes of Upper Palaeolithic hunter-gatherers from San Teodoro cave|date=18 November 2022|last=Scorano|first=G.|issue=1 |article-number=1262 |doi=10.1038/s42003-022-04190-2|pmid=36400919 |pmc=9674856 |s2cid=245021783 |doi-access=free}}</ref>
A 2023 study found that Gravettian-producing peoples belonged to two genetically distinct clusters. Fournol in the west (France and Spain) and Věstonice in the east (Czech Republic, Poland, Austria, Slovakia and Italy) both of whom traced their descent from producers of the earlier Aurignacian culture. Some individuals showed mixed ancestry from both clusters where the range of the two clusters bordered. The study found that members of the western Fournol cluster were ancestral to later Western European Cro-Magnon groups that existed after the Last Glacial Maximum, the producers of the Solutrean and Magdalenian cultures. All Gravettian-producing peoples are strongly genetically distinct from the producers of the later Epigravettian, who are genetically referred to as the Villabruna cluster, who show a greater affinity to ancient and modern peoples in West Asia than other Palaeolithic European hunter-gatherer groups. There is evidence of some genetic affinity between the Villabruna and Věstonice clusters, which may reflect shared common ancestry from the Balkans region.<ref name=":0">{{Cite journal |last1=Posth |first1=Cosimo |last2=Yu |first2=He |last3=Ghalichi |first3=Ayshin |last4=Rougier |first4=Hélène |last5=Crevecoeur |first5=Isabelle |last6=Huang |first6=Yilei |last7=Ringbauer |first7=Harald |last8=Rohrlach |first8=Adam B. |last9=Nägele |first9=Kathrin |last10=Villalba-Mouco |first10=Vanessa |last11=Radzeviciute |first11=Rita |last12=Ferraz |first12=Tiago |last13=Stoessel |first13=Alexander |last14=Tukhbatova |first14=Rezeda |last15=Drucker |first15=Dorothée G. |date=2 March 2023 |title=Palaeogenomics of Upper Palaeolithic to Neolithic European hunter-gatherers |journal=Nature |language=en |volume=615 |issue=7950 |pages=117–126 |doi=10.1038/s41586-023-05726-0 |issn=0028-0836 |pmc=9977688 |pmid=36859578|bibcode=2023Natur.615..117P }}</ref>
==Gallery== <gallery> File:Venus-de-Laussel-vue-generale-noir.jpg|Venus of Laussel, France, c. 23,000 BC. The markings on the horn may represent the lunar cycle.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.sciencenews.org/article/moon-time-calendar-ancient-human-art| title=Ancient humans used the moon as a calendar in the sky |website=Science News |date=2019}}</ref> File:Male figurine, mammoth ivory, Anthropos, Brno, 187999.jpg|Male figurine, mammoth ivory, Anthropos, Brno File:Vénus de Lespugue Gravettien Musée de l'Homme 04022018 3.jpg|Venus of Lespugue File:Vestonicka venuse edit.jpg|Venus of Dolní Věstonice File:Female figurines, Gravettian, Anthropos, Brno, 187957.jpg|Female figurines, Gravettian, Anthropos, Brno File:KM - Altsteinzeit Mammut.jpg|Mammoth figurine from Predmosti, Czech Republic File:URMU Blaubeuren Frauenstatuetten Gravettien.jpg|Various Gravettian statuettes File:Shaman equipment, Brno, Gravettian, 076836.jpg|Shaman equipment, Brno, Gravettian File:Abri du Poisson Cave - 1.jpg|Fish in Abri du Poisson Cave File:Engraving on a mammoth tusk, map, Gravettian, 076872.jpg|Engraving on a mammoth tusk, map File:Engraving on a mammoth tusk, map, Gravettian, 076872y.jpg|Engraving on a mammoth tusk, map File:Brillenhoehle Blaubeuren Schmuckanhaenger Tafel17.jpg|Gravettian necklace File:Gravettian engraving (Venus of Předmostí).jpg|Gravettian engraving (Venus of Předmostí) File:Venus 4 from Kostenki RU front.jpg|Venus figurine from Kostenki, Russia File:Venus de Lespugue (replica).jpg|Replica of the Venus of Lespugue File:Reconstruction of the Lady of Brassempouy by Libor Balák, Czech Academy of Sciences, the Institute of Archaeology in Brno, The Center for Paleolithic and Paleoethnological Research.jpg|Reconstruction of the Lady of Brassempouy by Libor Balák File:Vlčí radius.jpg|Engraved 'Wolf Bone' from Dolni Vestonice, c. 26,000 BP. The notches may represent numbers.<ref>* Graham Flegg, ''Numbers: their history and meaning'', Courier Dover Publications, 2002 {{ISBN|978-0-486-42165-0}}, pp. 41–42.</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Kapcar |first=Andrej |date=2011 |title=Tally sticks of the Stone Age |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333390516}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334988609 |title=Writing the History of Mathematics: Interpretations of the Mathematics of the Past and Its Relation to the Mathematics of Today (Pejlare & Bråting 2021) |pages=5 |quote=There is also evidence of early use of mathematics in Europe. In Dolni Vestonice in the Czech Republic, a 33,000-year-old wolf bone, believed to have been a tally stick, was found. In it 55 notches are carved, in groups of five. This suggests a use of a base five counting system.}}</ref> File:Musée d'Aquitaine - Collection préhistoire 17.jpg|Tools, France File:Spoon, Gravettian, Anthropos, Brno, 187965.jpg|Engraved spoon, Dolni Vestonice File:Frauenstatuette Gagarino 1.jpg|Venus figurine from Gagarino, Russia </gallery>
==See also== {{s-start}} {{succession box|title=Gravettian|before={{annotated link|Aurignacian}}|after=Solutrean|years=33,000–24,000 cal BP}} {{s-end}} {{Paleolithic}} * {{annotated link|Art of the Upper Paleolithic}} * {{annotated link|Aurignacian|Aurignacian culture}} * {{annotated link|Earth's Children series}} * {{annotated link|Epigravettian}} * {{annotated link|Haplogroup I-M170}} * {{annotated link|Last Glacial Maximum}} * {{annotated link|List of Stone Age art}} * Montgaudier Cave * {{annotated link|Perigordian}} * {{annotated link|Solutrean}} * {{annotated link|Upper Paleolithic}} * {{annotated link|Venus figurines}} *{{annotated link|Bayac}}, closest to the type-site of La Gravette
==Note== {{notelist}}
==References== {{Reflist}}
==Sources== {{Refbegin}} * {{cite journal |last1=Fu |first1=Qiaomei |date=2 May 2016 |title=The genetic history of Ice Age Europe |journal=Nature |publisher=Nature Research |volume=534 |issue=7606 |pages=200–205 |doi=10.1038/nature17993 |pmc=4943878 |pmid=27135931 |bibcode=2016Natur.534..200F |hdl=10211.3/198594 }} {{Refend}}
==External links== {{Commons category|Gravettian}} * [http://www.anthropark.wz.cz/aagalery.htm Picture Gallery of the Paleolithic (reconstructional palaeoethnology)] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170614033200/http://www.anthropark.wz.cz/aagalery.htm |date=14 June 2017 }}, Libor Balák at the Czech Academy of Sciences, the Institute of Archaeology in Brno, The Center for Paleolithic and Paleoethnological Research * [https://web.archive.org/web/20061116070957/http://www.culture.gouv.fr/culture/actualites/index-cussac.htm Cave sites in France] * [http://archaeologynewsnetwork.blogspot.ch/2013/08/20000-year-old-stone-pendant-found-in.html 20,000-year-old Gravettian stone pendant found in Piatra Neamţ, Romania] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140313001100/http://archaeologynewsnetwork.blogspot.ch/2013/08/20000-year-old-stone-pendant-found-in.html |date=13 March 2014 }} * [https://www.livescience.com/archaeology/prehistoric-jewelry-reveals-9-distinct-cultures-across-stone-age-europe Prehistoric jewelry reveals 9 distinct cultures across Stone Age Europe (2024)]
{{Prehistoric technology| state=expanded}} {{Authority control}}
Category:Gravettian Category:Upper Paleolithic cultures of Europe Category:Industries (archaeology)