{{Short description|Self-designation used by ancient Indo-Iranian peoples}} {{redirect |Arya |other uses}} {{About|the cultural and historical concept}} {{Pp-move}} {{italic title}} {{Indo-European topics}} '''''Aryan''''' ({{IPAc-en|ˈ|ɛər|i|ə|n}}), or '''''Arya''''' (borrowed from Sanskrit ''ārya''),<ref name="OED">Oxford English Dictionary Online 2024, s.v. ''Aryan'' (adj. & n.); ''Arya'' (n.)''.''</ref> is a term originating from the ethno-cultural self-designation of the Indo-Iranians.<ref name=":3" /><ref>{{Harvnb|Witzel|2001|p=2}}: "At the outset, it has to be underlined that the term ''Ārya'' (whence, Aryan) is the ''self''-designation of the ancient Iranians and of those Indian groups speaking Vedic Sanskrit and other Old Indo-Aryan (OIA) languages and dialects. Both peoples called themselves and their language ''ārya'' or ''arya'': [...]"</ref> It stood in contrast to nearby outsiders, whom they designated as non-Aryan ({{lang|iir-x-proto|an-āryā}}).<ref name=":4" /> In ancient India, the term was used by the Indo-Aryan peoples of the Vedic period, both as an endonym and in reference to a region called ''Aryavarta'' ({{Literal translation|Land of the Aryans}}),{{efn|{{Langx|sa|आर्यावर्त|Āryāvarta}}}} where their culture emerged.{{Sfn|Witzel|2001|pp=4, 24}} Similarly, according to the Avesta, the Iranian peoples used the term to designate themselves as an ethnic group and to refer to a region called ''Airyanem Vaejah'' ({{Literal translation|Expanse of the Arya}}),{{efn|{{Langx|ae|𐬀𐬌𐬭𐬌𐬌𐬀𐬥𐬆𐬨⸱ 𐬬𐬀𐬉𐬘𐬀𐬵|Airyanəm Vaēǰah}}}} which was their mythical homeland.<ref name=":5" /><ref name="Gnoli" /> The word stem also forms the etymological source of place names like ''Alania'' ({{lang|iir-x-proto|Aryāna}}) and ''Iran'' ({{lang|iir-x-proto|Aryānām}}).<ref name="Mallory" />
Although the stem {{lang|iir-x-proto|arya}} may originate from the Proto-Indo-European language,<ref name=":2" /> it seems to have been used exclusively by the Indo-Iranian peoples, as there is no evidence of it having served as an ethnonym for the Proto-Indo-Europeans. The view of many modern scholars is that the ethos of the ancient Aryan identity, as it is described in the Avesta and the ''Rigveda'', was religious, cultural, and linguistic, and was not tied to the concept of race.{{Sfn|Bryant|2001|pp=60–63}}<ref name=":0">{{harvnb|Witzel|2001|loc=p. 24: "''Arya''/''ārya'' does not mean a particular ''people'' or even a particular 'racial' group but all those who had joined the tribes speaking Vedic Sanskrit and adhering to their cultural norms (such as ritual, poetry, etc.)"}}</ref><ref name=":1">{{harvnb|Anthony|2007|loc=p. 408: "The ''Rigveda'' and ''Avesta'' agreed that the essence of their shared parental Indo-Iranian identity was linguistic and ritual, not racial. If a person sacrificed to the right gods in the right way using the correct forms of the traditional hymns and poems, that person was an Aryan."}}</ref>
In the 1850s, the French diplomat and writer Arthur de Gobineau brought forth the idea of the "Aryan race", essentially claiming that the Proto-Indo-Europeans were superior specimens of humans and that their descendants comprised either a distinct racial group or a distinct sub-group of the hypothetical Caucasian race. Through the work of his later followers, such as the British-German philosopher Houston Stewart Chamberlain, Gobineau's theory proved to be particularly popular among European racial supremacists and ultimately laid the foundation for Nazi racial theories, which also co-opted the concept of scientific racism.{{sfn|Anthony|2007|pp=9–11}} Hitler drew on vague ideas that the Aryans in ancient India were lighter-skinned and taller than their neighbors, and that, after relocating, they cultivated and bore all of the cultural creativity of Europe.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Bergen |first=Doris L. |title=War & Genocide |publisher=Rowman & Littlefield |year=2003 |isbn=9780847696314 |pages=36}}</ref>
In Nazi Germany, and also in German-occupied Europe during World War II, any citizen who was classified as an Aryan would be honoured as a member of the "master race" of humanity. Conversely, non-Aryans were legally discriminated against, including Jews, Roma, and Slavs (mostly Poles and Russians).<ref name=":7">{{Cite book|last=Gordon|first=Sarah Ann|title=Hitler, Germans, and the "Jewish Question"|date=1984|publisher=Princeton University Press|others=Mazal Holocaust Collection|isbn=0-691-05412-6|location=Princeton, N.J.|pages=96|oclc=9946459}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|last=Longerich|first=Peter|title=Holocaust : the Nazi persecution and murder of the Jews|date=2010|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0-19-280436-5|location=Oxford|pages=83,241|oclc=610166248}}</ref> Jews, who were regarded as the arch enemy of the "Aryan race" in a "racial struggle for existence",{{sfn|Weikart|2009|p=85}} were especially targeted by the Nazi Party, culminating in the Holocaust.<ref name=":7" /> The Roma, who are of Indo-Aryan origin, were also targeted, culminating in the Porajmos. The genocides and other large-scale atrocities that have been committed by Aryanists have led academic figures to generally avoid using "Aryan" as a stand-alone ethno-linguistic term, particularly in the Western world, where "Indo-Iranian" is the preferred alternative, although the term "Indo-Aryan" is still used to denote the Indic branch.<ref name=":6" />
== Etymology ==
=== English and European languages === [[File:Darius_I_the_Great's_inscription.jpg|thumb|One of the earliest epigraphically attested reference to the word ''arya'' occurs in the 6th-century BC Behistun inscription, which describes itself as having been composed "in ''arya'' [language or script]" (§ 70). As is also the case for all other Old Iranian language usage, the ''arya'' of the inscription does not signify anything but "Iranian".<ref name="Gershevitch2"><sup>''cf.''</sup> {{Cite book|last=Gershevitch|first=Ilya|title=Handbuch der Orientalistik, Literatur I|publisher=Brill|year=1968|location=Leiden|pages=1–31|chapter=Old Iranian Literature}}, p. 2.</ref>]] The term ''Arya'' was first rendered into a modern European language in 1771 as ''Aryens'' by French Indologist Abraham-Hyacinthe Anquetil-Duperron, who rightly compared the Greek ''arioi'' with the Avestan ''airya'' and the country name ''Iran.'' In Germany, Johann Friedrich Kleuker's translation of Anquetil-Duperron's work led to the introduction of the term ''Arier'' in 1776.{{Sfn|Arvidsson|2006|p=20}}{{Sfn|Motadel|2013|p=120}}
The Sanskrit word ''ā́rya'' is rendered as 'noble' in William Jones' 1794 translation of the Indian ''Laws of Manu.''{{Sfn|Arvidsson|2006|p=20}} The English ''Aryan'' (originally spelt ''Arian'') appeared a few decades later, first as an adjective in 1839, then as a noun in 1849, probably after the German ''Arier'' (noun), ''arisch'' (adjective).<ref name="OED" /> During the 19th and early 20th centuries, the meaning varied between the broader category equivalent to ''Indo-European'', and the narrower one equivalent to ''Indo-Iranian''.<ref name="OED" />
Use of Aryan to designate a "white non-Jewish person, especially one of northern European origin or descent" entered the English language from German,<ref name="OED" /> after this meaning was introduced in 1887 and further developed by German anti-Semitic propagandists in the context of a so-called "Aryan race".{{Sfn|Arvidsson|2006|p=21}} It is still used in far-right and white supremacist discourse, and sometimes appears in the names of such groups.<ref name="OED" />
=== Indo-Iranian === The Sanskrit word ''ā́rya'' (आर्य) was originally an ethnocultural term designating those who spoke Vedic Sanskrit and adhered to Vedic cultural norms (including religious rituals and poetry), in contrast to an outsider, or ''an-ā́rya'' ('non-Arya').{{sfn|Schmitt|1987}}{{Sfn|Witzel|2001|pp=4, 24}} By the time of the Buddha (5th–4th century BCE), it took the meaning of 'noble'.{{Sfn|Witzel|2001|p=4}} In Old Iranian languages, the Avestan term ''airya'' (Old Persian ''ariya'') was likewise used as an ethnocultural self-designation by ancient Iranian peoples, in contrast to an ''an-airya'' ('non-Arya'). It designated those who belonged to the 'Aryan' (Iranian) ethnic stock, spoke the language and followed the religion of the 'Aryas'.<ref name=":5">{{harvnb|Bailey|1987|loc=}}: "It is used in the ''Avesta'' of members of an ethnic group and contrasts with other named groups (Tūirya, Sairima, Dāha, Sāinu or Sāini) and with the outer world of the ''An-airya'' 'non-Arya'."</ref><ref name="Gnoli">{{harvnb|Gnoli|2006|loc=}}: "Mid. Pers. ''ēr'' (plur. ''ērān''), just like Old Pers. ''ariya'' and Av. ''airya'', has an evident ethnic value, which is also present in the abstract term ''ērīh'', 'Iranian character, Iranianness'."</ref>
These two terms derive from the reconstructed Proto-Indo-Iranian stem {{lang|iir-x-proto|arya}}- or {{lang|iir-x-proto|āryo}}-,<ref>{{harvnb|Szemerényi|1977|pp=125–146}}; {{harvnb|Watkins|1985|p=3}}; {{harvnb|Mallory|Adams|1997|p=304}}; {{harvnb|Fortson|2011|p=209}}</ref> which was probably the name used by the prehistoric Indo-Iranian peoples to designate themselves as an ethnocultural group.<ref name=":3">{{harvnb|Benveniste|1973|loc=p. 295: "''Arya'' [...] is the common ancient designation of the 'Indo-Iranians'."}}</ref>{{Sfn|Gamkrelidze|Ivanov|1995|pp=657–658}}{{Sfn|Kuzmina|2007|p=456}} The term did not have any racial connotation, which only emerged later in the works of 19th-century Western writers.{{Sfn|Bryant|2001|pp=60–63}}<ref name=":0"/>{{Sfn|Anthony|2007|p=408}} According to David W. Anthony, "the ''Rigveda'' and ''Avesta'' agreed that the essence of their shared parental Indo-Iranian identity was linguistic and ritual, not racial. If a person sacrificed to the right gods in the right way using the correct forms of the traditional hymns and poems, that person was an Aryan."{{Sfn|Anthony|2007|p=408}}
=== Proto-Indo-European === The Proto-Indo-European (PIE) origin of the Indo-Iranian stem ''arya''- remains debated. A number of scholars, starting with Adolphe Pictet (1799–1875), have proposed to derive ''arya''- from the reconstructed PIE term {{lang|ine-x-proto|h₂erós}} or {{lang|ine-x-proto|h₂eryós}}, variously translated as 'member of one's own group, peer, freeman'; as 'host, guest; kinsman'; or as 'lord, ruler'.<ref name=":2">{{harvnb|Watkins|1985|p=3}}; {{harvnb|Gamkrelidze|Ivanov|1995|pp=657–658}}; {{harvnb|Mallory|Adams|1997|p=213}}; {{harvnb|Anthony|2007|pp=92, 303}}</ref> However, the proposed Anatolian, Celtic and Germanic cognates are not universally accepted.<ref name="Delamarre">{{harvnb|Delamarre|2003|loc=p. 55: "Cette équation est cependant très controversée et de multiples tentatives pour expliquer indépendamment les formations celtiques et indo-iraniennes ont été produites : on a proposé entre autres de dériver le celtique ''ario''- de *''pṛrio''- [*''pṛhio''-, racine *''per(h)''- 'devant, en avant', d'où le sens dérivé 'qui est en avant, éminent'; on pourrait expliquer alors le NP ''Ario-uistus'' comme "Celui qui connaît (/ est connu) en avance", < *''ario-wid-to''-, ''LG 60''. L'absence de corrélats indiscutables dans d'autres langues i.-e. (grec ''ari''-, ''eri''-, hitt. ''arawa'', runique ''arjosteR'' etc.) rend l'équation incertaine. Un fait d'ordre mythologique, la comparaison entre l'Irlandais ''Eremon'' et l'Indien ''Aryaman'', figures dotées de fonctions sociales similaires, renforcerait cependant la validité de la comparaison (*''Ario-men''-), cf. G. Dumézil ''Le troisième souverain'' et J. Puhvel ''Analecta'' 322–330."}}</ref><ref name=":02">{{harvnb|Matasović|2009|loc=p. 43: "A different etymology (e.g. in Meid 2005: 146) relates these Celtic words to PIE *''prh₃''- 'first' (Skt. ''pūrvá''- etc.), but this is less convincing because there are no traces of the laryngeal in the purported Celtic reflexes (*''prh₃yo''- would have probably given PCelt. *''frāyo''-)."}}</ref> In any case, the Indo-Iranian ethnic connotation is absent from the other Indo-European languages, which rather conceived the possible cognates of {{lang|iir-x-proto|arya}}- as a social status (a freeman or noble), and there is no evidence that Proto-Indo-European speakers had a term to refer to themselves as 'Proto-Indo-Europeans'.{{sfn|Mallory|Adams|1997|p=213}}{{sfn|Fortson|2011|p=209}} * Early PIE: {{lang|ine-x-proto|h₂erós}},{{sfn|Mallory|Adams|2006|page=266}} ** Anatolian: *''ʔor-o-'', 'peer, freeman',{{sfn|Kloekhorst|2008|p=198}} *** Hittite: ''arā-'', 'comrade, peer, companion, friend'; ''arawanni-'', 'free, freeman (not being slave)'; ''natta ara'', 'not proper to the community',{{Sfn|Gamkrelidze|Ivanov|1995|pp=657–658}}{{sfn|Mallory|Adams|1997|page=213}}{{sfn|Kloekhorst|2008|p=198}} *** Lycian: ''arus-'', 'citizens'; ''arawa''-, 'freedom',{{sfn|Mallory|Adams|1997|p=213}}{{sfn|Kloekhorst|2008|p=198}} ** Late PIE: {{lang|ine-x-proto|h₂eryós}},{{sfn|Mallory|Adams|2006|page=266}} *** Indo-Iranian: {{lang|iir-x-proto|arya-}}, 'Aryan, Indo-Iranian',{{sfn|Schmitt|1987}}{{sfn|Mallory|Adams|2006|page=266}} **** Old Indo-Aryan: ''árya-'', 'Aryan, faithful to the Vedic religion'; ''aryá-'', 'kind, favourable, true, devoted'; ''arí-'', 'faithful; devoted person, ± kinsman';{{sfn|Schmitt|1987}}{{sfn|Mallory|Adams|2006|page=266}} **** Iranian: {{lang|iir-x-proto|arya-}}, 'Aryan, Iranian',{{Sfn|Mayrhofer|1992|pp=174–175}} ***** Avestan: ''airya''- (<small>pl.</small> ''aire''), 'Aryan, Iranian',{{sfn|Schmitt|1987}}{{Sfn|Gnoli|2006|p=}}{{sfn|Mallory|Adams|2006|page=266}} ***** Old Persian: ''ariya-'', 'Aryan, Iranian',{{sfn|Schmitt|1987}}{{Sfn|Mayrhofer|1992|pp=174–175}}''{{sfn|Mallory|Adams|1997|p=213}}'' *** Celtic: {{lang|cel-x-proto|aryo-}}, 'freeman; noble'; or perhaps from {{lang|cel-x-proto|prio-}} ('first > prominent, eminent'),<ref>{{harvnb|Mallory|Adams|1997|loc=p. 213: "OIr ''aire'' 'freeman (whether commoner or noble), noble (as distinct from commoner)' (the latter meaning may be rather from *''pṛios'', a derivative of 'first')."}}</ref><ref name="Delamarre"/><ref name=":02"/> **** Gaulish: ''ario-'', 'freeman, lord; foremost',{{Sfn|Delamarre|2003|p=55}}{{Sfn|Matasović|2009|p=43}} **** {{langx|sga|aire}}, 'freeman, chief; noble';{{Sfn|Delamarre|2003|p=55}}{{Sfn|Matasović|2009|p=43}} *** Germanic {{lang|gem-x-proto|arjaz}}, 'noble, distinguished, esteemed',{{sfn|Orel|2003|p=23}} **** Proto-Norse: ''arjosteʀ'', 'foremost, most distinguished'.{{Sfn|Delamarre|2003|p=55}}{{sfn|Orel|2003|p=23}}<ref>{{Cite book|last=Antonsen|first=Elmer H.|title=Runes and Germanic Linguistics|date=2002|publisher=Walter de Gruyter|isbn=978-3-11-017462-5|pages=127}}</ref>
The term {{lang|ine-x-proto|h₂er(y)ós}} may derive from the PIE verbal root {{lang|ine-x-proto|h₂er-}}, meaning 'to put together'.{{sfn|Duchesne-Guillemin|1979|p=337}}{{sfn|Mallory|Adams|1997|p=213}} Oswald Szemerényi has also argued that the stem could be a Near-Eastern loanword from the Ugaritic ''ary'' ('kinsmen'),{{sfn|Szemerényi|1977|pp=125–146}} although J. P. Mallory and Douglas Q. Adams find this proposition "hardly compelling".{{sfn|Mallory|Adams|1997|p=213}} According to them, the original PIE meaning had a clear emphasis on the in-group status of the "freemen" as distinguished from that of outsiders, particularly those captured and incorporated into the group as slaves. In Anatolia, the base word has come to emphasize personal relationship, whereas it took a more ethnic meaning among Indo-Iranians, presumably because most of the unfree ({{lang|iir-x-proto|anarya}}) who lived among them were captives from other ethnic groups.{{sfn|Mallory|Adams|1997|p=213}}
== Historical usage ==
=== Prehistoric Proto-Indo-Iranians === The term {{lang|iir-x-proto|arya}} was used by Proto-Indo-Iranian speakers to designate themselves as an ethnocultural group, encompassing those who spoke the language and followed the religion of the ''Aryas'' (Indo-Iranians)'','' as distinguished from the nearby outsiders known as the {{lang|iir-x-proto|Anarya}} ('non-Arya').<ref name=":4">{{harvnb|Schmitt|1987|loc=}}: "The name “Aryan” (OInd. ''āˊrya''-, Ir. *''arya''- [with short ''a''-], in Old Pers. ''ariya''-, Av. ''airiia''-, etc.) is the self designation of the peoples of Ancient India and Ancient Iran who spoke Aryan languages, in contrast to the “non-Aryan” peoples of those “Aryan” countries [...]"</ref>{{Sfn|Anthony|2007|p=408}}{{Sfn|Kuzmina|2007|p=456}} Indo-Iranians (''Aryas'') are generally associated with the Sintashta culture (2100–1800 BCE), named after the Sintashta archaeological site in Chelyabinsk Oblast, Russia.{{Sfn|Anthony|2007|p=408}}{{Sfn|Kuzmina|2007|p=451}} Linguistic evidence show that Proto-Indo-Iranian (Proto-Aryan) speakers dwelled in the Eurasian steppe, south of early Uralic tribes; the stem {{lang|iir-x-proto|arya}}- was notably borrowed into the Pre-Sámi language as *''orja''-, at the origin of ''oarji'' ('southwest') and ''årjel'' ('Southerner'). The loanword took the meaning 'slave' in other Finno-Permic languages, suggesting conflictual relations between Indo-Iranian and Uralic peoples in prehistoric times.{{Sfn|Rédei|1986|p=54}}{{Sfn|Anthony|2007|p=385}}<ref>{{Cite book|last=Koivulehto|first=Jorma|title=Early contacts between Uralic and Indo-European|publisher=Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne|year=2001|isbn=978-9525150599|editor-last=Carpelan|editor-first=Christian|pages=248|chapter=The earliest contacts between Indo-European and Uralic speakers|author-link=Jorma Koivulehto}}</ref>
The stem is also found in the Indo-Iranian god {{lang|iir-x-proto|Aryaman}}, translated as 'Arya-spirited,' 'Aryanness,' or 'Aryanhood;' he was known in Vedic Sanskrit as ''Aryaman'' and in Avestan as ''Airyaman''.{{Sfn|Benveniste|1973|p=303}}{{sfn|Mallory|1989|p=130}}{{sfn|West|2007|pp=142–143}} The deity was in charge of welfare and the community, and connected with the institution of marriage.{{Sfn|Mallory|Adams|1997|p=375}}{{sfn|West|2007|pp=142–143}} Through marital ceremonies, one of the functions of ''Aryaman'' was to assimilate women from other tribes to the host community.{{sfn|Benveniste|1973|p=72}} If the Irish heroes ''Érimón'' and ''Airem'' and the Gaulish personal name ''Ariomanus'' are also cognates (i.e. linguistic siblings sharing a common origin), a deity of Proto-Indo-European origin named {{lang|ine-x-proto|h₂eryo-men}} may also be posited.{{Sfn|Mallory|Adams|1997|p=375}}{{Sfn|Delamarre|2003|p=55}}{{sfn|West|2007|pp=142–143}}
=== Ancient times ===
==== Ancient India ==== [[File:Late Vedic Culture (1100-500 BCE).png|thumb|The approximate extent of ''Āryāvarta'' during the late Vedic period (ca. 1100–500 BCE). ''Aryavarta'' was limited to northwest India and the western Ganges plain, while Greater Magadha in the east was habitated by non-Vedic Indo-Aryans, who gave rise to Jainism and Buddhism.{{sfn|Bronkhorst|2007}}{{sfn|Samuel|2010}}]] Vedic Sanskrit speakers viewed the term ''ā́rya'' as a religious–linguistic category, referring to those who spoke the Sanskrit language and adhered to Vedic cultural norms, especially those who worshipped the Vedic gods (Indra and Agni in particular), took part in the yajna and festivals, and practiced the art of poetry.<ref>{{harvnb|Kuiper|1991|p=96}}; {{harvnb|Witzel|2001|pp=4, 24}}; {{harvnb|Bryant|2001|p=61}}; {{harvnb|Anthony|2007|p=11}}</ref>
The 'non-Aryas' designated primarily those who were not able to speak the ''āryā'' language correctly, the ''Mleccha'' or ''Mṛdhravāc.''{{Sfn|Thapar|2019|p=vii}} However, ''āryā'' is used only once in the Vedas to designate the language of the texts, the Vedic area being defined in the ''Kauṣītaki Āraṇyaka'' as that where the ''āryā vāc'' ('Ārya speech') is spoken.{{Sfn|Thapar|2019|p=2}} Some 35 names of Vedic tribes, chiefs and poets mentioned in the ''Rigveda'' were of 'non-Aryan' origin, demonstrating that cultural assimilation to the ''ā́rya'' community was possible, and/or that some 'Aryan' families chose to give 'non-Aryan' names to their newborns.{{Sfn|Kuiper|1991|pp=6–8, 96|p=}}{{Sfn|Anthony|2007|p=11}}{{Sfn|Kuzmina|2007|p=453}} In the words of Indologist Michael Witzel, the term ''ārya'' "does not mean a particular ''people'' or even a particular 'racial' group but all those who had joined the tribes speaking Vedic Sanskrit and adhering to their cultural norms (such as ritual, poetry, etc.)".{{Sfn|Witzel|2001|p=24}}
In later Indian texts and Buddhist sources, ''ā́rya'' took the meaning of 'noble', such as in the terms ''Āryadésa''- ('noble land') for India, ''Ārya-bhāṣā''- ('noble language') for Sanskrit, or ''āryaka''- ('honoured man'), which gave the Pali ''ayyaka''- ('grandfather').{{sfn|Bailey|1987}} The term came to incorporate the idea of a high social status, but was also used as an honorific for the Brahmana or the Buddhist monks. Parallelly, the Mleccha acquired additional meanings that referred to people of lower castes or aliens.{{Sfn|Thapar|2019|p=vii}}
==== Ancient Iran ==== {{See also|Arya (Iran)|Ariana|Iran (word)}} [[File:Young avestan geography.png|thumb|Approximate geographical extent of regions inhabited by the Arya of the Avesta vis-a-vis other Indo-Iranian peoples during the Young Avestan period ({{Circa}} 900–500 BCE)]] In the words of scholar Gherardo Gnoli, the Old Iranian ''airya'' (Avestan) and ''ariya'' (Old Persian) were collective terms denoting the "peoples who were aware of belonging to the one ethnic stock, speaking a common language, and having a religious tradition that centred on the cult of Ahura Mazdā", in contrast to the 'non-Aryas', who are called ''anairya'' in Avestan, ''anaryān'' in Parthian, and ''anērān'' in Middle Persian.{{sfn|Bailey|1987}}{{Sfn|Gnoli|2006}}
The people of the ''Avesta'', exclusively used the term airya ({{langx|ae|{{script|Avst|𐬀𐬌𐬭𐬌𐬌𐬀}}}}, {{Transliteration|ae|airiia}}) to refer to themselves.{{sfn|Kellens|2005}} It can be found in a number geographical terms like the 'expanse of the airyas' ({{lang|ae|airiianəm vaēǰō}}), the 'dwelling place of the airyas' ({{lang|ae|airiio.shaiianem}}), or the 'white forest of the airyas' ({{lang|ae|vīspe.aire.razuraya}}). The term can also be found in poetic expressions such as the 'glory of the airyas' ({{lang|ae|airiianąm xᵛarənō}}), the 'most swift-arrowed of the airyas' ({{lang|ae|xšviwi išvatəmō airiianąm}}), or the 'hero of the airyas' ({{lang|ae|arša airiianąm}}).{{sfn|Bailey|1987}} Although the Avesta does not contain any dateable events, modern scholarship assumes that the Avestan period mostly predates the Achaemenid period of Iranian history.<ref>{{cite book|last=Grenet|first=Frantz |editor-last1=Curtis|editor-first1=Vesta Sarkhosh|editor-last2=Stewart|editor-first2=Sarah |title=Birth of the Persian Empire Volume I|chapter=An Archaeologist's Approach to Avestan Geography |publisher=I.B.Tauris |year=2005|isbn=978-0-7556-2459-1|page=44|quote=It is difficult to imagine that the text was composed anywhere other than in South Afghanistan and later than the middle of the 6th century BC.}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last=Vogelsang|first=Willem|year=2000|author-link=Willem Vogelsang|title=The sixteen lands of Videvdat - Airyanem Vaejah and the homeland of the Iranians|journal=Persica|volume=16|doi=10.2143/PERS.16.0.511|page=62|quote=All of the above observations would indicate a date for the composition of the Videvdat list which would antedate, for a considerable time, the arrival in Eastern Iran of the Persian Acheamenids (ca. 550 B.C.)}}</ref>
By the late 6th–early 5th century BCE, the Achaemenid king Darius the Great and his son Xerxes I described themselves as ''ariya'' ('Arya') and ''ariya čiça'' ('of Aryan origin'). In the Behistun inscription, authored by Darius during his reign (522 – 486 BCE), the Old Persian language is called ''ariya'', and the Elamite version of the inscription portrays the Zoroastrian deity Ahura Mazdā as the "god of the Aryas" (''ura-masda naap harriia-naum'').{{sfn|Bailey|1987}}{{Sfn|Gnoli|2006}} {{multiple image | align = right | total_width = 350 | header = Darius at Behistun | image1 = Behistun_relief_Darius_and_Gaumata.jpg | caption1 = Full figure of Darius trampling rival Gaumata | image2 = Behistun Darius the Great.jpg | caption2 = Head of Darius with crenellated crown }}
The self-identifier was inherited in ethnic names such as the Parthian ''Ary'' (<small>pl.</small> ''Aryān''), the Middle Persian ''Ēr'' (<small>pl.</small> ''Ēran''), or the New Persian ''Irāni'' (<small>pl.</small> ''Irāniyān'').<ref name="Bailey3">{{harvnb|Bailey|1987|loc=: "In the inscription of Šāpūr I on the Kaʿba-ye Zardošt (ŠKZ), Parth. ''ʾryʾn W ʾnʾryʾn'' (''aryān ut anaryān''), Mid. Pers. ''ʾyrʾn W ʾnyrʾn'' (''ērān ut anērān''; cf. Armenian ''eran eut aneran'') comprises the inhabitants of all the known lands ... In the singular Parth. ''ʾry'', Mid. Pers. ''ʾyly'', Greek ''arian'' occurs in a title: ''ʾry mzdyzn nrysḥw MLKʾ'', *''ary mazdēzn Narēsahv šāh'' (Parth. ŠKZ 19); ''ʾyly mzdysn nrsḥy MLKʾ'' (Mid. Pers. version 24), Greek ''arian masdaasnou'' ... New Persian has ''ērān'' (western, ''īrān''), ''ērān-šahr''. In the Caucasus, Ossetic has Digoron ''erä'', ''irä'', Iron ''ir'', with Dig. ''iriston'', Iron ''iryston'' (the i-umlaut modifying the vowel ''a''-, but leaving the -''r''- untouched), [and] the ancestral ''Alān''."}}</ref>{{Sfn|Mayrhofer|1992|pp=174–175}} The Scythian branch has ''Alān'' or {{lang|ira-x-proto|Allān}} (from {{lang|iir-x-proto|Aryāna}}; modern ''Allon''), ''Rhoxolāni'' ('Bright Alans'), ''Alanorsoi'' ('White Alans'), and possibly the modern Ossetian ''Ir'' (<small>adj.</small> ''Iron''), spelled ''Irä'' or ''Erä'' in the Digorian dialect.<ref name="Bailey3"/><ref name="Mallory">{{harvnb|Mallory|Adams|1997|loc=p. 213: "Iran ''Alani'' (< *''aryana'') (the name of an Iranian group whose descendants are the Ossetes, one of whose subdivisions is the ''Iron'' [< *''aryana''-)), *''aryanam'' (pl.) 'of the Aryans' (> MPers ''Iran'')."}}</ref><ref name="Alemany">{{harvnb|Alemany|2000|loc=pp. 3–4, 8: "Nowadays, however, only two possibilities are admitted as regards [the etymology of ''Alān''], both closely related: (a) the adjective *''aryāna''- and (b) the pl. *''aryānām''; in both cases the underlying OIran. ajective *''arya''- 'Aryan' is found. It is worth mentioning that although it is not possible to give an unequivocal option because both forms produce the same phonetic result, most researchers tend to favour the derivative *''aryāna''-, because it has a more appropriate semantic value ... The ethnic name *''arya''- underlying in the name of the Alans has been linked to the Av. ''Airiianəm Vaēǰō'' 'the Aryan plain'."}}</ref> The Rabatak inscription, written in the Bactrian language in the 2nd century CE, likewise uses the term ''ariao'' for 'Iranian'.{{Sfn|Gnoli|2006}}
The name ''Arizantoi'', listed by Greek historian Herodotus as one of the six tribes composing the Iranian Medes, is derived from the Old Iranian {{lang|ira-x-proto|arya-zantu}}- ('having Aryan lineage').<ref>{{cite book|last=Brunner|first=C. J.|title=Encyclopædia Iranica|publisher=Routledge & Kegan Paul|year=1986|volume=2|chapter=Arizantoi|chapter-url=https://iranicaonline.org/articles/arizantoi-one-of-the-six-tribes-of-the-median-nation-as-listed-by-herodotus}}</ref> Herodotus also mentions that the Medes once called themselves ''Arioi'',<ref>{{Cite book |last=Herodotus |url=https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0126%3Abook%3D7%3Achapter%3D62%3Asection%3D1 |title=Histories, Book 7, Chapter 62 |publisher=perseus.tufts.edu |pages= |chapter=}}</ref> and Strabo locates the land of ''Arianē'' between Persia and India.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Roller |first1=Duane |title=The Geography of Strabo: An English Translation, with Introduction and Notes |date=29 May 2014 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-1-139-95249-1 |page=947 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=33GFAwAAQBAJ&pg=PT947}}</ref> Other occurrences include the Greek ''áreion'' (Damascius), ''Arianoi'' (Diodorus Siculus) and ''arian'' (<small>pl.</small> ''arianōn''; Sasanian period), as well as the Armenian expression ''ari'' (Agathangelos), meaning 'Iranian'.{{sfn|Bailey|1987}}{{Sfn|Gnoli|2006}}
Until the demise of the Parthian Empire (247 BCE–224 CE), the Iranian identity was essentially defined as cultural and religious. Following conflicts between Manichean universalism and Zoroastrian nationalism during the 3rd century CE, however, traditionalistic and nationalistic movements eventually took the upper hand during the Sasanian period, and the Iranian identity (''ērīh'') came to assume a definite political value. Among Iranians (''ērān''), one ethnic group in particular, the Persians, were placed at the centre of the ''Ērān-šahr'' ('Kingdom of the Iranians') ruled by the ''šāhān-šāh ērān ud anērān'' ('King of Kings of the Iranians and non-Iranians').{{Sfn|Gnoli|2006}}
Ethical and ethnic meanings may also intertwine, for instance in the use of ''anēr'' ('non-Iranian') as a synonymous of 'evil' in ''anērīh ī hrōmāyīkān'' ("the evil conduct of the Romans, i.e. Byzantines"), or in the association of ''ēr'' ('Iranian') with good birth (''hutōhmaktom ēr martōm'', 'the best-born Arya man') and the use of ''ērīh'' ('Iranianness') to mean 'nobility' against "labor and burdens from poverty" in the 10th-century ''Dēnkard''.{{sfn|Bailey|1987}} The Indian opposition between ''ārya''- ('noble') and ''dāsá''- ('stranger, slave, enemy') is however absent from the Iranian tradition.{{sfn|Bailey|1987}} According to linguist Émile Benveniste, the root {{lang|ira-x-proto|das-}} may have been used exclusively as a collective name by Iranian peoples: "If the word referred at first to Iranian society, the name by which this enemy people called themselves collectively took on a hostile connotation and became for the Aryas of India the term for an inferior and barbarous people."{{sfn|Benveniste|1973|pp=259–260}}
Old Persian names derived the stem {{lang|iir-x-proto|arya}}- include ''Aryabignes'' ({{lang|ira-x-proto|arya-bigna}}, 'Gift of the Aryans'), ''Ariarathes'' ({{lang|ira-x-proto|Arya-wratha-}}, 'having Aryan joy'), ''Ariobarzanēs'' ({{lang|ira-x-proto|Ārya-bṛzāna}}-, 'exalting the Aryans'), ''Ariaios'' ({{lang|ira-x-proto|arya-ai-}}, probably used as a hypocorism of the precedent names), or ''Ariyāramna'' (whose meaning remains unclear).<ref>{{cite book |last=Shahbazi |first=A. Sh. |author-link=Alireza Shapour Shahbazi |title=Encyclopædia Iranica |publisher=Routledge & Kegan Paul |year=1986 |isbn= |volume=2 |chapter=Ariyāramna |chapter-url=https://iranicaonline.org/articles/ariyaramna-greek-ariaramnes-old-persian-proper-name}}, {{cite book |last=Shahbazi |first=A. Sh. |author-link=Alireza Shapour Shahbazi |title=Encyclopædia Iranica |publisher=Routledge & Kegan Paul |year=1986 |isbn= |volume=2 |chapter=Ariabignes |chapter-url=https://iranicaonline.org/articles/ariabignes-an-achaemenid-prince}}, {{cite book |last=Brunner |first=C. J. |title=Encyclopædia Iranica |publisher=Routledge & Kegan Paul |year=1986 |isbn= |volume=2 |chapter=Ariaratus |chapter-url=https://iranicaonline.org/articles/ariaratus-one-of-the-three-sons-of-the-achaemenid-king-artaxerxes-ii}}, {{cite book |last=Lecoq |first=P. |title=Encyclopædia Iranica |publisher=Routledge & Kegan Paul |year=1986 |isbn= |volume=2 |chapter=Ariobarzanes |chapter-url=https://iranicaonline.org/articles/ariobarzanes-greek-form-of-old-iranian-proper-name-arya-brzana}}, {{cite book |last=Shahbazi |first=A. Sh. |author-link=Alireza Shapour Shahbazi |title=Encyclopædia Iranica |publisher=Routledge & Kegan Paul |year=1986 |volume=2 |chapter=Ariaeus |chapter-url=https://iranicaonline.org/articles/ariaeus-military-commander-in-the-army-of-cyrus-the-younger}}</ref> The English ''Alan'' and the French ''Alain'' (from Latin ''Alanus'') may have been introduced by Alan settlers to Western Europe during the first millennium CE.{{Sfn|Alemany|2000|p=5}}
==== Indo-Iranian place names ==== In ancient Sanskrit literature, the term ''Āryāvarta'' (आर्यावर्त, the 'abode of the Aryas') was the name given to the cradle of the Indo-Aryan culture in northern India. The ''Manusmṛiti'' locates ''Āryāvarta'' in "the tract between the Himalaya and the Vindhya ranges, from the Eastern (Bay of Bengal) to the Western Sea (Arabian Sea)".<ref>{{Cite book|last=Cook|first=Michael|title=Ancient Religions, Modern Politics: The Islamic Case in Comparative Perspective|date=2016|publisher=Princeton University Press|isbn=978-0-691-17334-4|author-link=Michael Cook (historian)|quote="Aryavarta ... is defined by Manu as extending from the Himalayas in the north to the Vindhyas of Central India in the south and from the sea in the west to the sea in the east."}}</ref>
The stem ''airya-'' also appears in ''Airyanəm Waēǰō'' (the 'stretch of the Aryas' or the 'Aryan plain'), which is described in the ''Avesta'' as the mythical homeland of the early Iranians, said to have been created as "the first and best of places and habitations" by the god Ahura Mazdā. It was referred to in Manichean Sogdian as ''ʾryʾn wyžn'' (''Aryān Wēžan''), and in Old Persian as {{lang|iir-x-proto|Aryānām Waiǰah}}, which gave the Middle Persian ''Ērān-wēž'', said to be the region where the first cattle were created and where Zaraθuštra first revealed the Good Religion.{{sfn|Bailey|1987}}{{sfn|MacKenzie|1998b}} The Sasanian Empire, officially named ''Ērān-šahr'' ('Kingdom of the Iranians'; from Old Persian {{lang|ira-x-proto|Aryānām Xšaθram}}),{{Sfn|Alemany|2000|p=3}} could also be referred to by the abbreviated form ''Ērān'', as distinguished from the Roman West known as ''Anērān.'' The western variant ''Īrān'', abbreviated from ''Īrān-šahr'', is at the origin of the English country name ''Iran''.{{sfn|Schmitt|1987}}{{sfn|Bailey|1987}}{{sfn|MacKenzie|1998a}}
''Alania'', the name of the medieval kingdom of the Alans, derives from a dialectal variant of the Old Iranian stem {{lang|ira-x-proto|Aryāna-}}, which is also linked to the mythical ''Airyanem Waēǰō''.<ref>{{harvnb|Benveniste|1973|loc=p. 300: "The name of ''Alani'' goes back to *''Aryana''-, which is yet another form of the ancient ''ārya''."}}</ref><ref name="Mallory" /><ref name="Alemany"/> Besides the ''ala''- development, {{lang|ira-x-proto|air-y}}- may have turned into the stem ''ir-y-'' via an i-mutation in modern Ossetian languages, as in the place name ''Iryston'' (Ossetia), here attached to the Iranian suffix {{lang|ira-x-proto|-stān}}.{{Sfn|Bailey|1987}}{{Sfn|Harmatta|1970|pp=78–81}}
Other place names mentioned in the ''Avesta'' include ''airyō šayana'', a movable term corresponding to the 'territory of the Aryas', ''airyanąm dahyunąm'', the 'lands of the Aryas', ''Airyō-xšuθa'', a mountain in eastern Iran associated with Ǝrəxša, and ''vīspe aire razuraya,'' the forest where Kavi Haosravō slew the god Vāyu.{{sfn|Bailey|1987}}{{sfn|MacKenzie|1998b}}
==== Graeco-Latin literature ==== The word Arianus was used to designate Ariana,<ref>{{cite book|title=The Annals and Magazine of Natural History: Including Zoology, Botany, and Geology|page=162|publisher=Taylor & Francis, Limited|year=1881}}</ref> the area comprising Afghanistan, Iran, North-western India and Pakistan.<ref>{{cite book|title=Udayana|quote=whole of Ariana (North-western India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Iran)|first=Udai|last=Arora|publisher=Anamika Pub & Distributors|year=2007|isbn=9788179751688}}</ref> In 1601, Philemon Holland used 'Arianes' in his translation of the Latin Arianus to designate the inhabitants of Ariana. This was the first use of the form ''Arian'' verbatim in the English language.<ref>[http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?allowed_in_frame=0&search=arian&searchmode=none Online Etymology Dictionary]</ref><ref>Robert K. Barnhart, Chambers Dictionary of Etymology pg. 54</ref><ref name="OED" />
=== Modern times ===
==== Iranian nationalism ==== {{Main|Iranian nationalism}}
In the late Qajar era, modern ideas about the Aryan identity were introduced to Iran and significantly influenced its nationalistic movement. Iranian intellectuals, reflecting on their pre-Islamic, Indo-European past, embraced a version of the Aryan myth that contrasted their heritage with the Arab (or Semitic) influence introduced after the Arab conquest (7th century AD). In the 19th century, thinkers like Mirza Fatali Akhundov (1812–1878) and Mirza Aqa Khan Kermani (1854–1896) promoted the idea of a grand, ancient Persian civilization. This narrative, which depicted Arab influence as destructive to Iranian culture while emphasizing shared roots with admired European civilizations, was widely disseminated through nationalist publications and became a cornerstone of 20th-century Iranian nationalist discourse.{{Sfn|Motadel|2013|pp=130–131}}
In Pahlavi Iran (1925–1979), nationalism was used to popularize the Aryan myth and promote Iranian antiquity, bolstering both national identity and the legitimacy of the ruling dynasty. This "Aryan and Neo-Achaemenid nationalism" emerged prominently in the 1930s and remained influential throughout the Pahlavi period.{{Sfn|Motadel|2013|pp=130–132}} In 1935, Reza Shah mandated that the country be known internationally as 'Iran' (a name linked to the term 'Aryan') rather than 'Persia', which was seen as a foreign label derived from the southern province of Fars. His son, Mohammad Reza, later adopted the title "King of the Kings, Light of the Aryans" (''Shahanshah'' ''Aryamehr''), and in the 1970s, he even proposed an 'Aryan brotherhood' among Iran, India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan as a means to foster regional peace and celebrate a shared legacy of a distinguished civilization.{{Sfn|Motadel|2013|pp=130–132}}
==== Religious use ==== {{see also|Root_race#The_fifth_root_race_(Aryan)|label 1=Aryan root race in Theosophy}} The word ''ārya'' is often found in Hindu, Buddhist, and Jain texts. In the Indian spiritual context, it can be applied to Rishis or to someone who has mastered the four noble truths and entered upon the spiritual path. According to Indian leader Jawaharlal Nehru, the religions of India may be called collectively ''ārya dharma,'' a term that includes the religions that originated in the Indian subcontinent (e.g. Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism and Sikhism).<ref>{{cite book|last=Kumar|first=Priya|chapter=Beyond tolerance and hospitality: Muslims as strangers and minor subjects in Hindu nationalist and Indian nationalist discourse|title=Living Together: Jacques Derrida's Communities of Violence and Peace|publisher=Fordham University Press|date=2012|isbn=9780823249923|editor=Elisabeth Weber|pages=95–96 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=OONc4cZKMigC&pg=PA95}}</ref>
The word ārya is also often used in Jainism, in Jain texts such as the Pannavanasutta. In Avaśyakaniryukti, an early Jaina text, a character named ''Ārya Mangu'' is mentioned twice.<ref>{{cite book|author1=K. L. Chanchreek|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=0YgRAQAAIAAJ|title=Jainism: Rishabha Deva to Mahavira|author2=Mahesh Jain|publisher=Shree Publishers & Distributors|year=2003|isbn=978-81-88658-01-5|page=276}}</ref>
==== Personal names ==== {{Main|Arya (name)|Aryan (name)}}
The name ''Aryan'' (including derivatives such as ''Aaryan,'' ''Arya, Ariyan'' or ''Aria'') is still used as a given name or surname in modern South Asia and Iran. There has also been a rise in names associated with ''Aryan'' in the West, which have been popularized due to pop culture. According to the U.S. Social Security Administration in 2012, ''Arya'' was the fastest-rising girl's name in popularity in the U.S., jumping from 711th to 413th position.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Carlson |first=Adam |date=10 May 2013 |title=Game of Thrones baby names on the march |url=https://ew.com/article/2013/05/10/arya-game-of-thrones-baby-names |publisher=Entertainment Weekly}}</ref> The name entered the top 200 most commonly used names for baby girls born in England and Wales in 2017.<ref>{{cite news |last=Mzimba |first=Lizo |date=20 September 2017 |title=Game of Thrones Arya among 200 most popular names |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-41336738 |publisher=BBC News}}</ref>
== Scholarship ==
=== 19th and early 20th century === The term 'Aryan' was initially introduced into the English language through works of comparative philology, as a modern rendering of the Sanskrit word ''ā́rya''. First translated as 'noble' in William Jones' 1794 translation of the ''Laws of Manu'', early-19th-century scholars later noticed that the term was used in the earliest Vedas as an ethnocultural self-designation "comprising the worshipers of the gods of the Brahmans".<ref name="OED" />{{Sfn|Arvidsson|2006|p=20}} This interpretation was simultaneously influenced by the presence of the word ''Ἀριάνης'' (Ancient Greek) ~ ''Arianes'' (Latin) in classical texts, which had been rightly compared by Anquetil-Duperron in 1771 to the Iranian ''airya'' (Avestan) ~ ''ariya'' (Old Persian), a self-identifier used by the speakers of Iranian languages since ancient times. Accordingly, the term 'Aryan' came to refer in scholarship to the Indo-Iranian languages, and, by extension, to the native speakers of the Proto-Indo-Iranian language, the prehistoric Indo-Iranian peoples.<ref>{{citation|last=Siegert|first=Hans|title=Zur Geschichte der Begriffe 'Arier' und 'Arisch'|journal=Wörter und Sachen|volume=4|pages=84–99|year=1941–1942|series=New Series}}</ref>
During the 19th century, through the works of Friedrich Schlegel (1772–1829), Christian Lassen (1800–1876), Adolphe Pictet (1799–1875), and Max Müller (1823–1900), the terms ''Aryans'', ''Arier'', and ''Aryens'' came to be adopted by a number of Western scholars as a synonym of '(Proto-)Indo-Europeans'.{{Sfn|Arvidsson|2006|p=21}} Many of them indeed believed that ''Aryan'' was also the original self-designation used by the prehistoric speakers of the Proto-Indo-European language, based on the erroneous assumptions that Sanskrit was the oldest Indo-European language and on the linguistically untenable position that ''Ériu'' (Ireland) was related to ''Arya''.<ref>{{harvnb|Schmitt|1987|loc=: "The use of the name 'Aryan', in vogue especially in the 19th century, as a designation of the entire Indo-European language family was based on the erroneous assumption that Sanskrit was the oldest IE. language, and the untenable view (primarily propagated by Adolphe Pictet) that the names of Ireland and the Irishmen were etymologically related to 'Aryan'."}}</ref> This hypothesis has since been abandoned in scholarship due to the lack of evidence for the use of ''arya'' as an ethnocultural self-designation outside the Indo-Iranian world.{{sfn|Fortson|2011|p=209}}
=== Contemporary scholarship === In contemporary scholarship, the terms 'Aryan' and 'Proto-Aryan' are still sometimes used to designate the prehistoric Indo-Iranian peoples and their proto-language. However, the use of 'Aryan' to mean 'Proto-Indo-European' is now regarded as an "aberration to be avoided".<ref name="Witzel2012">{{harvnb|Witzel|2001}}</ref> The 'Indo-Iranian' subfamily of languages – which encompasses the Indo-Aryan, Iranian, and Nuristani branches – may also be referred to as the 'Aryan languages'.<ref>{{harvnb|Schmitt|1987|loc=: "''The Aryan parent language''. The common ancestor of the historical Aryan or Indo-Iranian languages, called the Aryan parent language or Proto-Aryan, can be reconstructed by the methods of historical comparative linguistics."}}</ref>{{Sfn|Anthony|2007|p=385}}{{sfn|Fortson|2011|p=209}}
However, the atrocities committed in the name of Aryanist racial ideologies during the first part of the 20th century have led academics to generally avoid the term 'Aryan', which has been replaced in most cases by 'Indo-Iranian', although its Indic branch is still called 'Indo-Aryan'.{{Sfn|Arvidsson|2006|p=22}}{{sfn|Anthony|2007|p=10}}<ref name=":6">{{harvnb|Witzel|2001|loc=p. 3: "Linguists have used the term ''Ārya'' from early on in the 19th century to designate the speakers of most Northern Indian as well as of all Iranian languages and to indicate the reconstructed language underlying both Old Iranian and Vedic Sanskrit. Nowadays this well-reconstructed language is usually called Indo-Iranian (IIr.), while its Indic branch is called (Old) Indo-Aryan (IA)."}}</ref> The name 'Iranian', which stems from the Old Persian {{lang|ira-x-proto|Aryānām}}, also continues to be used to refer to specific ethnolinguistic groups.{{sfn|Schmitt|1987}} * Indo-Aryan refers to the populations speaking an Indo-Aryan language or identifying as Indo-Aryan; they form the predominant group in Northern Indian subcontinent.{{Sfn|Witzel|2001|p=3}} The largest Indo-Aryan ethnolinguistic groups are Hindi–Urdu, Bengali, Punjabi, Marathi, Gujarati, Rajasthani, Bhojpuri, Maithili, Odia, and Sindhi. More than 900 million people are native speakers of an Indo-Aryan language.{{sfn|Bryant|Patton|2005|pp=246–247}} * Iranian (or Iranic) is used to designate the speakers of Iranian languages or the peoples who identify as "Iranians", especially in Greater Iran. Modern Iranian ethnolinguistic groups include Persians, Pashtuns, Kurds, Tajiks, Balochs, Lurs, Pamiris, Zazas, and Ossetians. An estimated 150 to 200 million people are native speakers of an Iranian language.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Windfuhr|first=Gernot L.|title=The Iranian Languages|date=2013|publisher=Routledge|isbn=978-1-135-79703-4|pages=1|author-link=Gernot Ludwig Windfuhr}}</ref> Some authors writing for popular consumption have kept on using the word 'Aryan' for all Indo-Europeans in the tradition of H. G. Wells,<ref>Wells, H.G. ''The Outline of History'' New York:1920 Doubleday & Co. Chapter 19 The Aryan Speaking Peoples in Pre-Historic Times [Meaning the Proto-Indo-Europeans] Pages 271–285</ref><ref>[http://www.bartleby.com/86/19.html H.G. Wells describes the origin of the Aryans (Proto-Indo Europeans):]</ref> such as the science fiction author Poul Anderson,<ref>See the Poul Anderson short stories in the 1964 collection Time and Stars and the ''Polesotechnic League'' stories featuring Nicholas van Rijn</ref> and scientists writing for the popular media, such as Colin Renfrew.<ref>Renfrew, Colin. (1989). The Origins of Indo-European Languages. /Scientific American/, 261(4), 82–90. In explaining the Anatolian hypothesis, the term "Aryan" is used to denote "all Indo-Europeans"</ref> According to F. B. J. Kuiper, echoes of "the 19th century prejudice about 'northern' Aryans who were confronted on Indian soil with black barbarians [...] can still be heard in some modern studies."{{sfn|Kuiper|1991}}
==Aryanism and racism== {{main|Aryanism|Aryan race}}
=== Invention of the 'Aryan race' === ==== Early Romantic views ==== During the Romantic era, thinkers such as Johann Gottfried Herder (1744–1803) and, later, Johann Gottlieb Fichte (1762–1814) developed the idea of a nation (''Volk'') as an organic cultural community rooted in shared history, folklore, myths, poetry, and especially a common language. They saw linguistic ties as natural evidence of tribal connections, linking a Volk's ancestry to the origins of its language.{{Sfn|Motadel|2013|p=121}} In this context, some European scholars began to interpret the newly established Indo-European linguistic connection as evidence of a shared cultural and ethnic heritage, at times drawing parallels between modern Europeans and ancient Persians. In 1808, Friedrich Schlegel, in ''Über die Sprache und Weisheit der Indier'', proposed that the Indo-European languages (including Germanic) originated from a common ancestral tongue in ancient India or Persia. His work popularized the idea of a primordial "Indo-European people" (''Urvolk'') that had migrated westward from their 'original homeland' (''Urheimat'') in Asia.{{Sfn|Motadel|2013|p=121}}
==== North European hypothesis ==== {{main|North European hypothesis}}
[[File:Passing_of_the_Great_Race_-_Map_2.jpg|thumb|280x280px|"Expansion of the Pre-Teutonic Nordics" — map from ''The Passing of the Great Race'' by Madison Grant, showing hypothesized migrations of Nordic peoples]] In the second half of the 19th century, the idea that Indo-European languages had originated from Asia gradually lost ground in Western European scholarship. From the late 1860s onward, alternative models of Indo-European migrations began to emerge, some of them locating the ancestral homeland in Northern Europe.{{Sfn|Mallory|1989|p=268}}{{Sfn|Arvidsson|2006|p=52}} In 1868, Theodor Bensen proposed that the Aryans originated in Europe, and that some migrated to Asia to establish ancient Eastern civilisations, which he claimed had later "degenerated" through racial mixing on the periphery. This 'northern thesis' found growing support among German anthropologists and linguists such as Lazarus Geiger, Theodor Poesche, Ludwig Wilser, Karl Penka, and Gustaf Kossinna, and contributed to the emerging tendency to use the word ''Aryan'' as a synonym for ''Nordic'' or ''Germanic''.{{Sfn|Motadel|2013|p=125}}
Karl Penka, credited as "a transitional figure between Aryanism and Nordicism",<ref>{{Cite book |last=Hutton |first=Christopher M. |title=Race and the Third Reich: Linguistics, Racial Anthropology and Genetics in the Dialectic of Volk |date=2005 |publisher=Polity |isbn=978-0-7456-3177-6 |pages=108}}</ref> argued in 1868 that the Aryans originated in southern Scandinavia.<ref>{{Harvnb|Mallory|1989|p=268}}: "An Aryan homeland in the unhealthy environment of a swamp was hardly conducive to the development of the 'powerful, energetic blond race' or so Karl Penka argued in 1868. Rather, Penka pressed into service all the disciplines he could - archaeology, linguistics, anthropology and mythology - to demonstrate that the Aryans originated in Southern Scandinavia."</ref> In 1878, German-born anthropologist Theodor Poesche proposed locating the original Aryan homeland in Lithuania.{{Sfn|Motadel|2013|p=125}} In the early-20th century, German archaeologist Gustaf Kossinna (1858-1931), seeking to link prehistoric material cultures to the reconstructed Proto-Indo-European language, argued on archaeological grounds that the 'Indo-Germanic' (''Indogermanische'') migrations had originated from a homeland in northern Europe.{{sfn|Anthony|2007|pp=9–11}} Until the end of World War II, research on the Indo-European ''Urheimat'' broadly fell into two camps: Kossinna's followers, who favoured a northern European homeland, and those, initially led by Otto Schrader (1855–1919), who supported a Eurasian steppe homeland, the view that would later become dominant among scholars.{{Sfn|Mallory|1989|p=269}}
=== Theories of racial supremacy ===
==== Transition to racial biology ====
While Schlegel and early 19th-century proponents of Aryan migrations defined the Aryans in linguistic and cultural rather than biological terms, reflecting the influence of early national thinkers such as Herder, later scholars, including Julius Klaproth (1783–1835) and Frédéric Eichhoff (1799–1875), helped shift the concept of the ancient Aryans toward racial and biological interpretations.{{Sfn|Motadel|2013|pp=121–122}} Racially-oriented interpretations of the Vedic ''Āryas'' as 'fair-skinned foreign invaders' coming from the North gradually paved the way for the adoption of the term ''Aryan'' as a racial category connected to a supremacist ideology known as Aryanism, which portrayed the Aryan race as a so-called 'superior race' responsible for most of the achievements of ancient civilizations.{{Sfn|Bryant|2001|pp=60–63}}[[File:Arthur_de_Gobineau.jpg|thumb|240x240px|Arthur de Gobineau (1816–1882)]] Arthur de Gobineau, author of the influential ''Essay on the Inequality of the Human Races'' (1853–1855), viewed the white race (and particularly its Aryan branch) as the only truly civilized one, conceiving cultural decline and miscegenation as intimately intertwined. Relocating the Aryans' origins from Asia to northern Europe, Gobineau argued that the ancient Aryans (an offshoot of the 'white race') had spread across the world and founded the great civilizations of antiquity, before degenerating through intermixture with the 'inferior' indigenous populations, which he saw as the primary cause of civilizational decay.{{Sfn|Arvidsson|2006|p=45}}{{Sfn|Motadel|2013|p=123}} The last 'pure' Aryans, he believed, were the Germanics.{{Sfn|Motadel|2013|p=123}} Gobineau divided humanity into three 'primary races' (white, yellow, and black) classifying both Aryans and Semites within the white race. In the decades following his work, however, the term ''Aryan'' increasingly came to be used in racialist discourse as a synonym for ''non-Jewish'', a development that marked the transition from Gobineau's theory of racial hierarchy to the explicitly anti semitic Aryan ideology of the late 19th century.{{Sfn|Motadel|2013|p=124}}
==== Aryan race and antisemitism ==== Christian Lassen (1800–1876), a student of Schlegel, glorified the ancient Aryans as "the most gifted" and "perfect in talent", attributing to them an unparalleled cultural and intellectual refinement. He contrasted the Aryans with the Semites, helping establish an intellectual dichotomy between the two groups that would later take on racial overtones.{{Sfn|Motadel|2013|pp=121–122}} In this tradition, French orientalist Ernest Renan (1823–1892) portrayed the Semites as 'non-Aryans' and the Aryans as a creative and progressive race destined to lead human civilization. Similarly, Swiss linguist Adolphe Pictet (1799–1875) described the Aryans as the providential race and direct ancestors of Europeans. Influenced by Lassen and Renan, he depicted a fundamental moral and spiritual opposition between the Semitic and the superior Aryan peoples.{{Sfn|Motadel|2013|p=123}}
The first recorded instance of the German ''Arier'' to mean 'non-Jewish' appears to date from 1887, when a Viennese gymnastic society decided to admit only "Germans of Aryan descent" (''Deutsche arischer Abkunft'') as members.{{Sfn|Arvidsson|2006|p=21}} In ''The Foundations of the Nineteenth Century'' (1899), which Stefan Arvidsson notes is identified as "one of the most important proto-Nazi texts",{{Sfn|Arvidsson|2006|p=153}} British-German writer Houston Chamberlain envisioned an existential struggle between a superior German-Aryan race and a destructive Jewish-Semitic race, echoing Renan's antagonistic division between Aryans and Semites.{{Sfn|Arvidsson|2006|p=155}}{{Sfn|Motadel|2013|p=124}} Chamberlain's work was highly influential; German Emperor Wilhelm II personally praised it and recommended it as required reading for trainee teachers.{{Sfn|Motadel|2013|p=124}} The best-seller ''The Passing of the Great Race'' (1916), by American author Madison Grant in 1916, warned against miscegenation with the supposedly 'inferior' immigrant races – including speakers of Indo-European languages (such as Slavs, Italians, and Yiddish-speaking Jews) – which he believed threatened the 'racially superior' Germanic ''Aryans'' (that is: Americans of English, German, and Scandinavian descent).{{sfn|Anthony|2007|pp=9–11}}
Racial mysticists like Paul de Lagarde (1827–1891) and Julius Langbehn (1851–1907) idealized the Aryans as nature-bound, unspoilt Germanics (''Urgermanen''), opposed to the materialism, liberalism, and cosmopolitanism of modern society.{{Sfn|Motadel|2013|p=125}} Led by Guido von List (1848–1919) and Jörg Lanz von Liebenfels (1874–1954), the Ariosophists developed an ideological synthesis combining ''Völkisch'' nationalism with esoterism. Prophesying a coming era of German (Aryan) world domination, they maintained that a vast conspiracy against Germans – allegedly instigated by non-Aryan races, by the Jews, or by the early Church – had "sought to ruin this ideal Germanic world by emancipating the non-German inferiors in the name of a spurious egalitarianism".{{Sfn|Goodrick-Clarke|1985|p=2}}
==== Nazi racial theories ==== {{main|Nazi racial theories}}
[[File:Birth of a nation Aryan quote.jpg|thumb|275px|An intertitle from the silent film blockbuster ''The Birth of a Nation'' (1915). "Aryan birthright" is here "white birthright", the "defense" of which unites "whites" in the Northern and Southern U.S. against "coloreds". In another film of the same year, ''The Aryan'', William S. Hart's "Aryan" identity is defined in distinction from other peoples.]]
Von Liebenfels and Houston Stewart Chamberlain — together with wider currents of social-Darwinist thought and late-19th-century racial anthropology — contributed important elements to Nazi racial ideology, especially notions of Aryan supremacy, racial struggle, and the imperative of racial purity.{{sfn|Anthony|2007|pp=9–11}}{{Sfn|Motadel|2013|p=125}}{{Sfn|Weikart|2009|p=12}} In ''Mein Kampf'' (1925), Adolf Hitler ideologically equated the ideal of the Aryan with the German people ('Volk'), presenting it as part of a non-Jewish, so-called 'master race', and framed a mythic history in which a Nordic Aryan people supposedly conquered foreign lands, founded great civilisations, and later declined through racial dilution.{{Sfn|Motadel|2013|pp=125–126}}{{Sfn|Weikart|2009|pp=5–6}} He cast strengthening the Aryan race as both a political and moral imperative, hereby legitimizing measures that suspended humanitarian and legal protections for groups labelled as inferior (''Untermenschen''). Such policies were defended as necessary for the 'survival' and advancement of the 'Aryans'.{{Sfn|Weikart|2009|pp=5–6}} Jews were racialized as morally and biologically inferior people that needed to be eliminated, one way or another, from German society. Under the Nazi regime this translated into exclusionary laws, economic and social marginalisation, mass deportations and, ultimately, state-organised plans for systematic extermination.{{Sfn|Weikart|2009|p=9}}
Alfred Rosenberg, the chief racial ideologue of the Nazi Party, expanded on the idea of an ancient Nordic migration in ''The Myth of the Twentieth Century'' (1930), portraying the ancient Persians as "Aryans with northern blood" who had eventually degenerated due to intermixing with so-called 'lower races'. He cited Persian history as a cautionary example of racial miscegenation (''Bastardierung''). This view was shared by many Nazi ideologues, who attributed the decline of the Aryan race to 'foreign infiltration' (''Überfremdung'') by so-called 'Semitic races'.{{Sfn|Motadel|2013|p=127}} In 1935, the Nazis founded the ''Ahnenerbe'' to research 'Aryan prehistory' through archaeological, anthropological, and linguistic studies.{{Sfn|Arvidsson|2006|pp=181–182}} Its president, Walther Wüst, maintained that the Germans were directly descended from the Aryan 'Nordic race', which had spread into Asia until racial mixing caused 'degeneration' (''Entartung'') and 'de-Nordicization' (''Entnordnung'').{{Sfn|Motadel|2013|p=129}}
By the late 19th century, German and Austrian student fraternities (along with some professional associations) had already introduced 'Aryan clauses' excluding Jews. The Third Reich was the first to formalize the term ''Aryan'' in national legislation. On 7 April 1933, the Nazi government enacted the 'Aryan Paragraph' (''Arierparagraph''); expressions such as 'Proof of Aryan Ancestry' (''Ariernachweis'') and 'Aryanisation' (''Arisierung'') subsequently entered official legal language, used to implement racial laws primarily targeting Jews.{{Sfn|Motadel|2013|pp=125–126}} In September 1935, the Nazis enacted the Nuremberg Laws, which required proof of 'Aryan descent' as a prerequisite for Reich citizenship. Applicants could demonstrate this by obtaining an ''Ahnenpass'' ('ancestor passport'), providing documentary proof—typically baptismal or parish records—that all four grandparents were of 'Aryan' descent.<ref>Ehrenreich, Eric (2007). ''The Nazi Ancestral Proof: Genealogy, Racial Science, and the Final Solution'', p. 68</ref> In December of the same year, the SS established ''Lebensborn'' ('Fount of Life') to increase births among racially 'valuable' Germans and to promote population policy based on Nazi eugenic principles.{{Sfn|Weikart|2009|p=133}}[[File:ArnoBrekerDiePartei.jpg|thumb|220x220px|Arno Breker's sculpture ''Die Partei (The Party)'', depicting a Nazi-era ideal of the "Nordic Aryan" racial type]]Many American white supremacist and neo-Nazi groups and prison gangs continue to refer to themselves as 'Aryans', including the Aryan Brotherhood, the Aryan Nations, the Aryan Republican Army, the White Aryan Resistance, or the Aryan Circle.{{sfn|Goodrick-Clarke|2002|pp=232–233}}<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Blazak|first=Randy|date=2009|title=The prison hate machine|journal=Criminology & Public Policy|volume=8|issue=3|pages=633–640|doi=10.1111/j.1745-9133.2009.00579.x|issn=1745-9133}}</ref> In Russia, several nationalist and neo-Pagan movements claim direct descent from the ancient 'Aryans',{{sfn|Anthony|2007|pp=9–11}} while in some Indian nationalist circles, the term 'Aryan' is still used in reference to a supposed Aryan 'race'.{{Sfn|Witzel|2001|p=4}}
=== Aryanism in India ===
==== Racial interpretations of the ''Rigveda'' ==== In 1888 Max Müller, whose early effort to trace physical differences between Aryans and Dāsas in the ''Rigveda'' had inadvertently launched racial interpretations of Vedic texts,{{Sfn|Bryant|2001|p=60}} denounced talk of an "Aryan race, Aryan blood, Aryan eyes and hair" as a nonsense comparable to a linguist speaking of "a dolichocephalic dictionary or a brachycephalic grammar".{{Sfn|Mallory|1989|p=269}} Nevertheless, an increasing number of Western writers, particularly anthropologists and popularizers influenced by Darwinian theories, came to conceive the ''Āryas'' of the ''Rigveda'' as a 'physical-genetic species' distinct from other human groups – rather than as an ethnolinguistic category.{{Sfn|Goodrick-Clarke|1985|p=5}}{{Sfn|Arvidsson|2006|p=61}}
In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, noted anthropologists Theodor Poesche and Thomas Huxley quoted from the ''Rigveda'' to suggest that the Aryans were blond and tall, with blue eyes and dolichocephalic skulls.{{Sfn|Mallory|1989|p= [https://archive.org/details/189942876InSearchOfTheIndoEuropeansJPMallory/page/n268/mode/1up 268-269]}}{{Sfn|Arvidsson|2006|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=idTPDI6l0mkC&pg=PA43 43]}} Throughout the 20th century, physical anthropologists continued to debate these racial interpretations — some associating Indo-European speakers with light physical traits, others rejecting any biological basis for such claims.<ref>{{harvnb|Bryant|2001|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=Y2jfHlinW4UC&pg=PA60 60–63]}}</ref> According to archeologist Elena Kuzmina (1931–2013), both the Avesta and the Rig Veda support the view that the Aryans did possessed light eyes, light skin, and light hair,{{sfn|Kuzmina|2007|loc=pp. 171-172: "The Aryans in the Avesta are tall, light-skinned people with light hair; their women were light-eyed, with long, light tresses... In the Rigveda light skin alongside language is the main feature of the Aryans, differentiating them from the aboriginal Dáśa-Dasyu population who were a dark-skinned, small people speaking another language and who did not believe in the Vedic gods... Skin color was the basis of social division of the Vedic Aryans; their society was divided into social groups varṇa, literally 'color'. The varṇas of Aryan priests (brāhmaṇa) and warriors (kṣatriyaḥ or rājanya) were opposed to the varṇas of the aboriginal Dáśa, called 'black-skinned'..."}} whereas linguist Hans Henrich Hock has argued that most Vedic passages traditionally cited for this interpretation may refer instead to contrasts between dark and light worlds rather than to human pigmentation.<ref>{{harvnb|Bryant|Patton|2005|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=fHYnGde4BS4C&pg=PA8 8]}}</ref>
Most modern scholars state that the historical Aryans, the Vedic period Bronze Age tribes who composed the Rigveda and the Avesta, and who were the ancestors of contemporary Indo-Aryan and Iranian peoples, were highly unlikely to have been blond or blue-eyed, contrary to the proponents of Aryanism and Nordicism.{{sfn|Anthony|2007|p=10}}{{sfn|Witzel|2008|pp=10–11}} They further assert that even in ancient times, the Aryan identity as asserted in the ''Rig Veda'' was cultural, religious, and linguistic, not racial; nor do the ''Vedas'' contemplate racial purity.{{sfn|Bryant|2001|pp=60–63}}{{sfn|Anthony|2007|p=11}}{{sfn|Witzel|2008|p=21}} The Rig Veda affirms a ritualistic barrier: an individual is considered Aryan if they sacrifice to the right gods, which requires performing traditional prayer in the traditional language, and does not connote a racial barrier.{{sfn|Anthony|2007|p=11}} Michael Witzel states that term Aryan "does not mean a particular ''people'' or even a particular 'racial' group but all those who had joined the tribes speaking Vedic Sanskrit and adhering to their cultural norms (such as ritual, poetry, etc.)".{{sfn|Witzel|2008|p=21}}
==== Nazi views on Indo-Aryans ==== From the mid-1930s onward, certain SS ideologues and Adolf Hitler himself increasingly expressed admiration for the ancient Indo-Aryan civilization of northern India and its modern North Indian upper-caste heirs.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Himmler|first=Heinrich|title=Geheimreden 1933 bis 1945 und andere Ansprachen|date=1974|publisher=Propyläen Verlag|editor1-last=Smith|editor1-first=Bradley F.|editor2-last=Peterson|editor2-first=Agnes F.|location=Berlin|pages=201–202|language=de}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|last=Hale|first=Christopher|title=Himmler's Crusade: The Nazi Expedition to Find the Origins of the Aryan Race|date=2003|publisher=John Wiley & Sons|isbn=978-0-471-26292-3|pages=312–318}}</ref> They interpreted the Vedic texts and the varna system as evidence that a light-skinned Aryan warrior elite had once imposed rigorous racial hierarchy on the subcontinent.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Schröder|first=Ernst|title=Die "arische" Religion und die indische Kastenordnung|journal=SS-Leitheft|volume=9|issue=4|date=1944|pages=12–19}}</ref> By late 1944, as relations with the United Kingdom hardened into total enmity, Hitler privately described the Maurya Empire under Chandragupta Maurya and Bindusara (pointedly excluding the later Buddhist Ashoka) as the historical pinnacle of Aryan statecraft, a racially pure empire that had unified nearly the entire subcontinent through conquest and iron discipline.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Picker|first=Henry|title=Hitlers Tischgespräche im Führerhauptquartier|date=1951|edition=expanded 1963|publisher=Seewald Verlag|location=Stuttgart|pages=612–615 (entry of 3 January 1945)}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|last=Jäckel|first=Eberhard|title=Hitlers Herrschaft: Vollzug einer Weltanschauung|date=1986|publisher=Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt|isbn=3-421-06255-2|pages=189–191}}</ref> Senior Ahnenerbe researchers received orders to emphasise linguistic, mythic, and racial parallels between the ancient Indic and Germanic traditions.<ref>{{Cite archive |title=Ahnenerbe directive "Neue Prioritäten Indienforschung" |date=12 December 1944 |institution=Bundesarchiv Berlin |collection=NS 19/3972}}</ref>In the final year of the war, Hitler and elements within the SS leadership began to regard upper-caste North Indians of purportedly unmixed Indo-Aryan descent as distant racial cousins and as the natural bearers of a future Hindu rashtra aligned with National Socialist principles.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Toyé|first=Pierre|title=Subhas Chandra Bose: Approches nouvelles|date=1969|publisher=Éditions L’Harmattan|location=Paris|pages=278–284}}</ref><ref>{{Cite archive |title=Ribbentrop–Keppler memorandum "Indische Frage nach dem Endsieg" |date=8 February 1945 |institution=Politisches Archiv des Auswärtigen Amts |collection=R 27756}}</ref> Late-war German propaganda celebrated Subhas Chandra Bose as the authentic voice of Aryan India, and a small number of Indian Legion volunteers were reclassified as "honorary Aryans" in internal SS documents of early 1945.<ref>{{Cite archive |title=SS-FHA order 117/45 "Status indischer Freiwilliger" |date=21 March 1945 |institution=Bundesarchiv-Militärarchiv |collection=RS 3-33/12}}</ref> These ideological shifts, which included tentative plans to support a post-war independent India free from British rule and modelled on Hindutva ideology, remained largely theoretical due to the rapid military collapse of the Third Reich.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Kallis|first=Aristotle|title=Nazi Ideology and the End of the "New Order" in Asia|date=2009|publisher=Palgrave Macmillan|isbn=978-0-230-21706-5|pages=167–172}}</ref>
==== British Raj ==== In India, the British colonial government had followed de Gobineau's arguments along another line, and had fostered the idea of a superior 'Aryan race' that co-opted the Indian caste system in favor of imperial interests.{{sfn|Leopold|1974}}{{sfn|Thapar|1996}} In its fully developed form, the British-mediated interpretation foresaw a segregation of Aryan and non-Aryan along the lines of caste, with the upper castes being "Aryan" and the lower ones being 'non-Aryan'. The European developments not only allowed the British to identify themselves as high-caste, but also allowed the Brahmins to view themselves as on-par with the British. Further, it provoked the reinterpretation of Indian history in racialist and, in opposition, Indian Nationalist terms.{{sfn|Leopold|1974}}{{sfn|Thapar|1996}}
==== "Aryan invasion theory" ==== {{Main|Indo-Aryan_migrations#"Aryan_invasion"|l1 = "Aryan invasion"}}
Translating the sacred Indian texts of the Rig Veda in the 1840s, German linguist Friedrich Max Muller found what he believed was evidence of an ancient invasion of India by Hindu Brahmins, a group which he called "the Arya." In his later works, Muller was careful to note that he thought that Aryan was a linguistic rather than a racial category. Nevertheless, scholars used Muller's invasion theory to propose their own visions of racial conquest through South Asia and the Indian Ocean. In 1885, the New Zealand polymath Edward Tregear argued that an "Aryan tidal-wave" had washed over India and continued to push south, through the islands of the East Indian archipelago, reaching the distant shores of New Zealand. Scholars such as John Batchelor, Armand de Quatrefages, and Daniel Brinton extended this invasion theory to the Philippines, Hawaii, and Japan, identifying indigenous peoples who they believed were the descendants of early Aryan conquerors.<ref name="Robinson2016">{{Cite book|last=Robinson|first=Michael|title=The Lost White Tribe: Explorers, Scientists, and the Theory that Changed a Continent|publisher=Oxford University Press|year=2016|isbn=9780199978489|location=New York|pages=147–161}}</ref> With the discovery of the Indus Valley civilization, mid-20th century archeologist Mortimer Wheeler argued that the large urban civilization had been destroyed by the Aryans.<ref name="GLP">{{citation|author=Gregory L. Possehl|title=The Indus Civilization: A Contemporary Perspective|page=238|year=2002|publisher=Rowman Altamira|isbn=9780759101722}}</ref> Later, this position was discredited, with climate aridification being viewed as the likely cause of the collapse of the Indus Valley Civilization.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Malik|first1=Nishant|year=2020|title=Uncovering transitions in paleoclimate time series and the climate driven demise of an ancient civilization|url=https://aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/5.0012059|journal=Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science|series=Nishant Malik, Chaos (2020)|volume=30|issue=8|article-number=083108|bibcode=2020Chaos..30h3108M|doi=10.1063/5.0012059|pmid=32872795|s2cid=221468124|url-access=subscription}}</ref> The term "invasion", while it was once commonly used in regard to Indo-Aryan migration, is now usually used only by opponents of the Indo-Aryan migration theory.{{sfn|Witzel|2005|p=348}} The term "invasion" does not any longer reflect the scholarly understanding of the Indo-Aryan migrations,{{sfn|Witzel|2005|p=348}} and is now generally regarded as polemical, distracting and unscholarly.
In recent decades, the idea of an Aryan migration into India has mainly been disputed by Indian scholars, who have various alternate theories about the early history of the Indigenous Aryans which are contrary to the established Kurgan model. However, these alternative theories are rooted in traditional and religious views of Indian history and identity and are universally rejected by mainstream scholars.{{sfnm|1a1=Bryant|1y=2001|2a1=Bryant|2a2=Patton|2y=2005|3a1=Singh|3y=2008|3p=186|4a1=Witzel|4y=2001}}{{refn|group=note|name="no support"|No support in mainstream scholarship: * Romila Thapar (2006): "there is no scholar at this time seriously arguing for the indigenous origin of Aryans".{{sfn|Thapar|2006}} * Wendy Doniger (2017): "The opposing argument, that speakers of Indo-European languages were indigenous to the Indian subcontinent, is not supported by any reliable scholarship. It is now championed primarily by Hindu nationalists, whose religious sentiments have led them to regard the theory of Aryan migration with some asperity."<ref group=web name="Doniger_2017">Wendy Doniger (2017), [https://inference-review.com/article/another-great-story "Another Great Story"]", review of Asko Parpola's ''The Roots of Hinduism''; in: ''Inference, International Review of Science'', Volume 3, Issue 2</ref> * Girish Shahane (September 14, 2019), in response to Narasimhan et al. (2019): "Hindutva activists, however, have kept the Aryan Invasion Theory alive, because it offers them the perfect strawman, 'an intentionally misrepresented proposition that is set up because it is easier to defeat than an opponent's real argument' ... The Out of India hypothesis is a desperate attempt to reconcile linguistic, archaeological and genetic evidence with Hindutva sentiment and nationalistic pride, but it cannot reverse time's arrow ... The evidence keeps crushing Hindutva ideas of history."<ref group=web name="Shahane_2019">Girish Shahane (September 14, 2019), [https://scroll.in/article/937043/why-hindutva-supporters-love-to-hate-the-discredited-aryan-invasion-theory ''Why Hindutva supporters love to hate the discredited Aryan Invasion Theory''], Scroll.in</ref> * Koenraad Elst (May 10, 2016): "Of course it is a fringe theory, at least internationally, where the Aryan Invasion Theory (AIT) is still the official paradigm. In India, though, it has the support of most archaeologists, who fail to find a trace of this Aryan influx and instead find cultural continuity."<ref name="Elst_2016">Koenraad Elst (May 10, 2016), Koenraad Elst: "I am not aware of any governmental interest in correcting distorted history", ''Swarajya Magazine''</ref>}} According to Michael Witzel, the "indigenous Aryans" position is not scholarship in the usual sense, but an "apologetic, ultimately religious undertaking".{{sfn|Witzel|2001|p=95}} A number of other alternative theories have been proposed including Anatolian hypothesis, Armenian hypothesis, the Paleolithic continuity theory but these are not widely accepted and have received little or no interest in mainstream scholarship.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Alinei |first=Mario |year=2002 |chapter=Towards a generalised continuity model for Uralic and Indo European languages |editor-last=Julku |editor-first=Kyösti |title=The Roots of Peoples and Languages of Northern Eurasia IV, Oulu 18.8–20.8.2000 |citeseerx=10.1.1.370.8351<!-- Chapter link --> |location=Oulu, Finland |publisher=Societas Historiae Fenno-Ugricae}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=The Horse, the Wheel, and Language: How Bronze-Age Riders from the Eurasian Steppes Shaped the Modern World|author=David W. Anthony|pages=300–400}}</ref>
== See also == * Aria, a province of the Achaemenid, Seleucid, and Parthian Empires * Arya Samaj, considered a monotheistic Indian Hindu reform movement, its name means the "Noble", i.e., the "Aryan Society" * Graeco-Aryan * {{section link|Šahrestānīhā ī Ērānšahr|Terms Eran and Eranshahr}}{{snd}}Eranshahr, the official name of the Sasanian Empire, literally means the "Land/Empire of the Aryans" * Yamnaya culture
== Notes == {{notelist}} {{reflist|2|group=note}}
'''Web''' {{reflist|2|group=web}}
== References == {{reflist|30em}}
=== Bibliography === {{refbegin|30em|indent=yes}} <!-- A --> * {{Cite book|last=Alemany|first=Agustí|title=Sources on the Alans: A Critical Compilation|year=2000|publisher=Brill|isbn=978-90-04-11442-5}} * {{Cite book|last=Anthony|first=David W.|title=The Horse, the Wheel, and Language: How Bronze-Age Riders from the Eurasian Steppes Shaped the Modern World|publisher=Princeton University Press|year=2007|isbn=978-0691058870|author-link=David W. Anthony}} * {{Cite book |last=Arvidsson |first=Stefan |title=Aryan Idols: Indo-European Mythology as Ideology and Science |year=2006 |publisher=University of Chicago Press |isbn=978-0-226-02860-6}} <!-- B --> * {{cite book|last=Bailey|first=H. W.|title=Encyclopædia Iranica|publisher=Iranica Foundation|year=1987|volume=2|chapter=Arya|author-link=Harold Walter Bailey|chapter-url=https://iranicaonline.org/articles/arya-an-ethnic-epithet}} * {{Cite book|last=Benveniste|first=Émile|url=https://archive.org/details/indoeuropeanlang0000benv|title=Indo-European Language and Society|publisher=University of Miami Press|year=1973|isbn=978-0870242502|author-link=Émile Benveniste|url-access=registration}} * {{Cite book| last =Bronkhorst | first =Johannes | date =2007 | title =Greater Magadha: Studies in the Culture of Early India | publisher =BRILL | isbn =9789004157194}} * {{Cite book|last=Bryant|first=Edwin|title=The Quest for the Origins of Vedic Culture: The Indo-Aryan Migration Debate|year=2001|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0-19-516947-8|author-link=Edwin Bryant (author)}} * {{Cite book|last1=Bryant|first1=Edwin|title=The Indo-Aryan Controversy: Evidence and Inference in Indian History|last2=Patton|first2=Laurie L.|year=2005|publisher=Routledge|isbn=978-0-7007-1463-6|author-link=Edwin Bryant (author)|author-link2=Laurie L. Patton}} <!-- D --> * {{Cite book|last=Delamarre|first=Xavier|title=Dictionnaire de la langue gauloise: Une approche linguistique du vieux-celtique continental|year=2003|publisher=Errance|isbn=9782877723695|author-link=Xavier Delamarre}} * {{Cite book|last=Duchesne-Guillemin|first=Jacques|title=Acta Iranica|year=1979|publisher=Brill|isbn=978-90-04-05941-2|author-link=Jacques Duchesne-Guillemin}} <!-- F --> * {{Cite book|last=Fortson|first=Benjamin W.|title=Indo-European Language and Culture|publisher=Blackwell Publishing|year=2011|isbn=978-1-4051-0316-9|edition=2|author-link=Benjamin W. Fortson IV}} <!-- G --> * {{Cite book|last1=Gamkrelidze|first1=Tamaz V.|title=Indo-European and the Indo-Europeans: A Reconstruction and Historical Analysis of a Proto-Language and a Proto-Culture|last2=Ivanov|first2=Vyacheslav V.|year=1995|publisher=Mouton de Gruyter|isbn=978-3-11-014728-5|author-link=Tamaz V. Gamkrelidze|author-link2=Vyacheslav Ivanov (philologist)}} * {{cite book|last=Gnoli|first=Gherardo|title=Encyclopædia Iranica|publisher=Iranica Foundation|year=2006|volume=13|chapter=Iranian Identity ii. Pre-Islamic Period|author-link=Gherardo Gnoli|chapter-url=http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/iranian-identity-ii-pre-islamic-period}} * {{Cite book|last=Goodrick-Clarke|first=Nicholas|title=The occult roots of Nazism : the Ariosophists of Austria and Germany 1890–1935|year=1985|publisher=Aquarian Press|isbn=0-85030-402-4|author-link=Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke}} * {{Cite book|last=Goodrick-Clarke|first=Nicholas|title=Black Sun: Aryan Cults, Esoteric Nazism, and the Politics of Identity|year=2002|publisher=New York University Press|isbn=978-0-8147-3155-0|author-link=Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke}} <!-- H --> * {{Cite book|last=Harmatta|first=János|title=Studies in the History and Language of the Sarmatians|year=1970|publisher=S.l|author-link=János Harmatta}} <!-- J --> * {{cite book|title=The Archaeology of Ethnicity: Constructing Identities in the Past and Present|first=Sian|last=Jones|year= 1997|location=London|publisher=Routledge, Taylor & Francis|edition=1|doi=10.4324/9780203438732|isbn=978-0203438732|url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9780203438732/archaeology-ethnicity-si%C3%A2n-jones}} <!-- K --> * {{Cite book|last=Kloekhorst|first=Alwin|title=Etymological Dictionary of the Hittite Inherited Lexicon|year=2008|publisher=Brill|isbn=978-90-04-16092-7|author-link=Alwin Kloekhorst}} * {{Cite book|last=Kuiper|first=F. B. J.|title=Aryans in the Rigveda|year=1991|publisher=Rodopi|isbn=90-5183-307-5|oclc=26608387|author-link=Franciscus Bernardus Jacobus Kuiper}} * {{Cite book|last=Kuzmina|first=Elena E.|title=The Origin of the Indo-Iranians|year=2007|publisher=Brill|isbn=978-90-04-16054-5|author-link=Elena Efimovna Kuzmina}} <!-- L --> * {{Cite journal|last=Leopold|first=Joan|year=1974|title=British Applications of the Aryan Theory of Race to India, 1850-1870|journal=The English Historical Review|volume=89|issue=352|pages=578–603|doi=10.1093/ehr/LXXXIX.CCCLII.578|issn=0013-8266|jstor=567427}} <!-- M --> * {{cite book|last=Kellens|first=Jean|author-link=Jean Kellens|year=2005|chapter=Les Airiia - ne sont plus des Āryas: ce sont déjà des Iraniens|title=Āryas, Aryens et Iraniens en Asie centrale|publisher=Association de Boccard}} * {{cite book|last=MacKenzie|first=D. N.|title=Encyclopædia Iranica|publisher=Iranica Foundation|year=1998a|volume=8|chapter=Ērān, Ērānšahr|author-link=David Neil MacKenzie|chapter-url=https://iranicaonline.org/articles/eran-eransah}} * {{cite book|last=MacKenzie|first=D. N.|title=Encyclopædia Iranica|publisher=Iranica Foundation|year=1998b|volume=8|chapter=Ērān-Wēz|author-link=David Neil MacKenzie|chapter-url=https://iranicaonline.org/articles/eran-wez}} * {{Cite book|last=Mallory|first=J. P.|title=In Search of the Indo-Europeans: Language, Archaeology, and Myth|year=1989|publisher=Thames and Hudson|isbn=9780500050521|author-link=J. P. Mallory}} * {{Cite book|last1=Mallory|first1=J. P.|title=Encyclopedia of Indo-European Culture|last2=Adams|first2=Douglas Q.|year=1997|publisher=Fitzroy Dearborn|isbn=978-1-884964-98-5|author-link=J. P. Mallory|author-link2=Douglas Q. Adams}} * {{Cite book|last1=Mallory|first1=J. P.|title=The Oxford Introduction to Proto-Indo-European and the Proto-Indo-European World|last2=Adams|first2=Douglas Q.|year=2006|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0-19-929668-2|author-link=J. P. Mallory|author-link2=Douglas Q. Adams}} * {{Cite book|last=Matasović|first=Ranko|title=Etymological Dictionary of Proto-Celtic|year=2009|publisher=Brill|isbn=9789004173361|author-link=Ranko Matasović}} *{{Cite book |last=Motadel |first=David |chapter=Iran and the Aryan myth |title=Perceptions of Iran: History, Myths and Nationalism from Medieval Persia to the Islamic Republic |year=2013 |publisher=I.B. Tauris |isbn=978-0-7556-1162-1}} * {{Cite book|last=Mayrhofer|first=Manfred|title=Etymologisches Wörterbuch des Altindoarischen|year=1992|publisher=Carl Winter|isbn=3-533-03826-2|oclc=14693324|author-link=Manfred Mayrhofer}} <!-- O --> * {{Cite book|last=Orel|first=Vladimir E.|title=A handbook of Germanic etymology|year=2003|publisher=Brill|isbn=1-4175-3642-X|oclc=56727400|author-link=Vladimir Orel}} <!-- P --> * {{Cite book|last=Poliakov|first=Léon|title=The Aryan myth : a history of racist and nationalist ideas in Europe|year=1974|publisher=Basic Books|isbn=0-465-00452-0|oclc=1011605|author-link=Léon Poliakov}} <!-- R --> * {{Cite book|last=Rédei|first=Károly|title=Zu den indogermanisch-uralischen Sprachkontakten|year=1986|publisher=Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften|isbn=978-3-7001-0768-2}} <!-- S --> * {{Cite book |last=Samuel | first=Geoffrey | year=2010 | title=The Origins of Yoga and Tantra | publisher=Cambridge University Press}} * {{cite book|last=Schmitt|first=Rüdiger|title=Encyclopædia Iranica|publisher=Iranica Foundation|year=1987|volume=2|chapter=Aryans|author-link=Rüdiger Schmitt|chapter-url=http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/aryans}} * {{cite book |last1=Singh |first1=Upinder |title=A History of Ancient and Early Medieval India: From the Stone Age to the 12th Century |year=2008 |publisher=Pearson Education India |isbn=978-81-317-1677-9}} * {{Cite book|last=Szemerényi|first=Oswald|title=Studies in the Kinship Terminology of the Indo-European Languages|year=1977|publisher=Brill|oclc=470049907|author-link=Oswald Szemerényi}} <!-- T --> * {{cite journal|last=Thapar|first=Romila|title=The Theory of Aryan Race and India: History and Politics|journal=Social Scientist|volume=24|issue=1/3|year=1996|pages=3–29|doi=10.2307/3520116|issn=0970-0293|jstor=3520116}} * {{cite book|last=Thapar|first=Romila|year=2006|title=India: Historical Beginnings and the Concept of the Aryan|publisher=National Book Trust|isbn=9788123747798}} * {{Cite book|last=Thapar|first=Romila|title=Which of Us are Aryans?: Rethinking the Concept of Our Origins|year=2019|publisher=Aleph|isbn=978-93-88292-38-2|author-link=Romila Thapar}} <!-- W --> * {{Cite book|last=Watkins|first=Calvert|title=The American Heritage Dictionary of Indo-European Roots|year=1985|publisher=Houghton Mifflin|isbn=0-395-37888-5|oclc=11533475|author-link=Calvert Watkins}} * {{Cite book|last=West|first=Martin L.|title=Indo-European Poetry and Myth|year=2007|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0-19-928075-9|author-link=Martin Litchfield West}} *{{Cite book |last=Weikart |first=R. |title=Hitler's Ethic: The Nazi Pursuit of Evolutionary Progress |year=2009 |publisher=Springer |isbn=978-0-230-62398-9}} * {{Cite book|last=Witzel|first=Michael|year=2000|chapter=The Home of the Aryans|editor-first1=A.|editor-last1=Hinze|editor-first2=E.|editor-last2=Tichy|title=Festschrift fuer Johanna Narten zum 70. Geburtstag|publisher =J. H. Roell}} * {{Cite journal|last=Witzel|first=Michael|author-link=Michael Witzel|year=2001|title=Autochthonous Aryans? The Evidence from Old Indian and Iranian Texts|volume=7|pages=1–115|journal=Electronic Journal of Vedic Studies|issue=3|doi=10.11588/ejvs.2001.3.830}} * {{Cite journal|last=Witzel|first=Michael|author-link=Michael Witzel|date=17 April 2008|title=Autochthonous Aryans? The Evidence from Old Indian and Iranian Texts|url=https://fid4sa-repository.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/118/|volume=14|journal=Electronic Journal of Vedic Studies|issue=3|doi=10.11588/xarep.00000118}} * {{Cite encyclopedia |last=Witzel |first=Michael |editor-last1=Bryant |editor-first1=Edwin |editor-last2=Patton |editor-first2=Laurie |encyclopedia=The Indo-Aryan Controversy: Evidence and Inference in Indian History |title=Indocentrism: Autochthonous visions of ancient India |year=2005 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-135-79102-5 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=NDRRNGj17EMC |access-date=25 March 2021 }} {{refend}} <!-- Z --> * {{cite journal|journal=European Journal of Archaeology|volume=3|issue=1|year=1995|doi=10.1179/096576695800688278|publisher=Cambridge University Press|title=At the Interface of Archaeology, Linguistics and Genetics: Indo-European Dispersals and the agricultural transition in Europe|url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-european-archaeology/article/abs/at-the-interface-of-archaeology-linguistics-and-genetics-indoeuropean-dispersals-and-the-agricultural-transition-in-europe/017A5B249A4E3E85F834882129EA5CC0|first=Marek|last=Zvelebil|pages=33–70|url-access=subscription}}
==Further reading== * Arvidsson, Stefan. ”Aryan: conceptual history”, Wenda Trevathan (ed.), T''he International encyclopedia of biological anthropology''. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 2018. {{ISBN|978-1-118-58442-2}} * {{Cite web|url=https://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://scholar.google.ca/&httpsredir=1&article=2330&context=ocj|title=A word for Aryan originality|author=A. Kammpier |ref=none}} * {{Cite book| editor-last=Bronkhorst|editor-first=J.|editor2-last=Deshpande|editor2-first=M.M.|title=Aryan and Non-Aryan in South Asia: Evidence, Interpretation, and Ideology|publisher=Department of Sanskrit and Indian Studies, Harvard University|publication-date=1999|isbn=1-888789-04-2|year=1999}} * {{Cite book|last =Edelman|first =Dzoj (Joy) I.|year =1999|title =On the history of non-decimal systems and their elements in numerals of Aryan languages. In: Jadranka Gvozdanović (ed.), "Numeral Types and Changes Worldwide"|publisher =Walter de Gruyter}} * {{Cite book|last1=Fussmann|first1=G.|last2=Francfort|first2=H.P.|last3=Kellens|first3=J.|last4=Tremblay|first4=X.|title=Aryas, Aryens et Iraniens en Asie Centrale|date=2005|publisher=Institut Civilisation Indienne|isbn=2-86803-072-6 |ref=none}} * {{Cite journal|first1 =Vyacheslav V.| last1 =Ivanov|first2 =Thomas|last2 =Gamkrelidze|title =The Early History of Indo-European Languages|journal =Scientific American|volume =262|issue =3|pages =110–116|year =<!--March--> 1990|doi =10.1038/scientificamerican0390-110 |ref=none}} * {{Cite book|last1=Lincoln|first1=Bruce|title=Theorizing Myth: Narrative, Ideology, and Scholarship|publisher=University of Chicago Press|year=1999 |ref=none}} * {{Cite book|last1=Morey|first1=Peter|last2=Tickell|first2=Alex|title=Alternative Indias: Writing, Nation and Communalism|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Hf0geg3kl7sC|year=2005|publisher=Rodopi|isbn=90-420-1927-1 |ref=none}} * {{Cite book|last=Sugirtharajah|first=Sharada|title=Imagining Hinduism: A Postcolonial Perspective|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=aIX4JYZHW2MC|year=2003|publisher=Taylor & Francis|isbn=978-0-203-63411-0 |ref=none}} * {{Cite book|last=Tickell|first=A|year=2005|chapter=The Discovery of Aryavarta: Hindu Nationalism and Early Indian Fiction in English|title=Alternative Indias: Writing, Nation and Communalism|editor1=Peter Morey|editor2=Alex Tickell|pages=25–53 |ref=none}}
{{Zoroastrianism}} {{Hindudharma}} {{Buddhism topics}} {{Jainism topics}} {{Authority control}}
Category:Etymologies Category:Esoteric anthropogenesis Category:Ancient peoples Category:Indo-Iranian peoples Category:History of Iran Category:Ancient India Category:Avesta Category:Vedas Category:Ethno-cultural designations Category:Indo-European linguistics