{{Short description|Current master plan for US military and counterterrorism contingency}} {{Use American English|date=February 2026}} {{Use mdy dates|date=February 2026}} The '''National Defense Strategy''' ('''NDS''') is produced by the United States Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) and is signed by the United States Secretary of Defense as the United States Department of Defense's (DoD) capstone strategic guidance. The NDS is required by law that mandates the secretary of defense to publish a "strategic framework" to address “priority missions of the Department of Defense” and the “assumed strategic environment.” It should “support the most recent National Security Strategy (NSS) report of the President." In theory, the NSS provides guidance for the DoD to outline military planning, military strategy, force posturing, force constructs, force modernization, etc. It is expected to be produced every four years, with an "unclassified summary" made available to the public.<ref name= ndsUnclNprMdr >Lloyd Austin III, US Secretary of Defense, et. al. [https://media.defense.gov/2022/Oct/27/2003103845/-1/-1/1/2022-NATIONAL-DEFENSE-STRATEGY-NPR-MDR.PDF (27 Oct 2022) 2022 National Defense Strategy of the United States, including the 2022 Nuclear Posture Review, and the 2022 Missile Defense Review] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230117075350/https://media.defense.gov/2022/Oct/27/2003103845/-1/-1/1/2022-NATIONAL-DEFENSE-STRATEGY-NPR-MDR.PDF |date=January 17, 2023 }} 80 pages: Unclassified. NDS (1st-32nd pages); NPR (33rd-62nd pages); MDR (63rd-80th pages)</ref><ref name= ndsFact >US Department of Defense [https://media.defense.gov/2022/Mar/28/2002964702/-1/-1/1/NDS-FACT-SHEET.PDF (28 Mar 2022) Fact Sheet: 2022 National Defense Strategy] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220328213613/https://media.defense.gov/2022/Mar/28/2002964702/-1/-1/1/NDS-FACT-SHEET.PDF |date=March 28, 2022 }} 2 page sketch NDS</ref><ref name= kahl2Hour >Colin Kahl, US Department of Defense [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dF8LxP8hPhw (4 Nov 2022) The 2022 National Defense Strategy: A conversation with Colin Kahl] 2 hour discussion of NDS presented by the Brookings Institution</ref><ref name=":0">{{Cite journal |last=Cancian |first=Mark F. |last2=Park |first2=Chris H. |date=2026-01-27 |title=The 2026 National Defense Strategy by the Numbers: Radical Changes, Moderate Changes, and Some Continuities |url=https://www.csis.org/analysis/2026-national-defense-strategy-numbers-radical-changes-moderate-changes-and-some |journal=Center for Strategic and International Studies |language=en}}</ref><ref name= cjcsi5123 >CJCSI 5123.011 [https://www.jcs.mil/Portals/36/Documents/Library/Instructions/CJCSI%205123.01I.pdf (30 October 2021) CHARTER OF THE JOINT REQUIREMENTS OVERSIGHT COUNCIL AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE JOINT CAPABILITIES INTEGRATION AND DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240224182621/https://www.jcs.mil/Portals/36/Documents/Library/Instructions/CJCSI%205123.01I.pdf |date=February 24, 2024 }} JROC charter and JCIDS</ref>

The NDS informs another related document, the National Military Strategy (NMS),{{efn|name=nms2018|1= " °''Force employment'' addresses planning, force management, and decisionmaking to fulfill the defense objectives of the NDS. °''Force development'' adapts functions, capabilities, and concepts to improve the current Joint Force. °''Force design'' innovates to enable the Joint Force to do what it does differently to retain a competitive advantage against any adversary".<ref name= nms2018 >The Joint Staff [https://www.jcs.mil/Portals/36/Documents/Publications/UNCLASS_2018_National_Military_Strategy_Description.pdf (2018) Description of the National Military Strategy 2018] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240308094340/https://www.jcs.mil/Portals/36/Documents/Publications/UNCLASS_2018_National_Military_Strategy_Description.pdf |date=March 8, 2024 }} 8 pages</ref> as cited by <ref name= desc2018Nms >Office of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Public Affairs [https://www.jcs.mil/Media/News/News-Display/Article/1903669/description-of-the-2018-national-military-strategy-released/ (12 July 2019) Description of the 2018 National Military Strategy Released] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221219020828/https://www.jcs.mil/Media/News/News-Display/Article/1903669/description-of-the-2018-national-military-strategy-released/ |date=December 19, 2022 }}</ref>}}{{efn|name=g357}} written by the Joint Chiefs of Staff and signed by its Chairman (CJCS).<ref name= nms2018 /> The NMS and NDS often agree, but since the CJCS's role is to give unfiltered military advice to the government, the NMS is also an opportunity for the CJCS to provide a contrary opinion, however rare. In any case, the NMS is a further refinement of the NDS to provide the U.S. military with more detailed guidance for theater campaign planning, modernization, force posturing, and force structure. NMS is often classified, while the NDS is not. By law, the Secretary of Defense has to release an unclassified summary of the classified version of the NDS.<ref name="ndsFact" /><ref>{{Cite web |date=28 March 2022 |title=Fact Sheet: 2022 National Defense Strategy |url=https://media.defense.gov/2022/Mar/28/2002964702/-1/-1/1/NDS-FACT-SHEET.PDF |access-date=29 March 2022 |website=United States Department of Defense |archive-date=March 28, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220328213613/https://media.defense.gov/2022/Mar/28/2002964702/-1/-1/1/NDS-FACT-SHEET.PDF |url-status=live }}</ref> thumb|Report space on 2018, 2022, and 2026 NDS dedicated to major topics Each NDS emphasizes different issues areas, reflecting priorities that each administration identifies as the most important for the U.S. military to address. Prioritization is a universal feature of the NDS across administrations that have to manage global interests with limited budgets.

In 2018, under the first Trump administration, the NDS became the sole successor to the Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR).<ref name="brookings2018">{{cite web|url=https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2018/01/21/how-to-read-the-2018-national-defense-strategy/|title=How to read the 2018 National Defense Strategy|last1=Karlin|first1=Mara|website=Brookings Institution|date=21 January 2018|accessdate=May 1, 2018|archive-date=April 23, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190423231743/https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2018/01/21/how-to-read-the-2018-national-defense-strategy/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="qdrDead">{{cite web|last1=Gould|first1=Joe|title=QDR Dead in 2017 Defense Policy Bill|url=https://www.defensenews.com/home/2016/04/25/qdr-dead-in-2017-defense-policy-bill/|website=Defense News|date=25 April 2016 |accessdate=May 1, 2018}}</ref><ref name="mattis2018">[https://hub.jhu.edu/2018/01/19/jim-mattis-unveils-new-national-defense-strategy/ Saralyn Cruickshank (Jan 19, 2018) U.S. Defense Secretary James Mattis outlines bold new national defense strategy at Johns Hopkins] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190817044954/https://hub.jhu.edu/2018/01/19/jim-mattis-unveils-new-national-defense-strategy/ |date=August 17, 2019 }} #Updating nuclear command, control, and support infrastructure to better counter-attacks from U.S. adversaries #Prioritizing investments in space operations and capabilities #Integrating cyber defense into the full spectrum of military operations #Developing information systems that support the military's tactical operations, strategic planning, and intelligence gathering</ref> The 2018 NDS focused on great power competition with China and Russia and shifted attention away from counterterrorism.

In 2022, under the Biden administration, the NDS<ref name="ndsUnclNprMdr" />{{rp|1–32}} was released on October 27 along with the Missile Defense Review (MDR)<ref name="ndsUnclNprMdr" />{{rp|63rd-80th pages}}{{efn|name= mdrSummary |1= MDR Summary: 1) air/missile threat environment; 2) US strategy and policy framework; 3) strengthening international cooperation;<ref name= karako27Oct2022 >Tom Karako, CSIS [https://www.csis.org/analysis/2022-missile-defense-review-still-seeking-alignment (27 Oct 2022) The 2022 Missile Defense Review: Still Seeking Alignment] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221219003524/https://www.csis.org/analysis/2022-missile-defense-review-still-seeking-alignment |date=December 19, 2022 }}</ref><ref name= jPlumb14Nov2022 >Tom Karako, CSIS [https://www.csis.org/analysis/2022-missile-defense-review (14 Nov 2022) The 2022 Missile Defense Review: A Conversation with John Plumb] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221219004824/https://www.csis.org/analysis/2022-missile-defense-review |date=December 19, 2022 }} assistant secretary of defense for space policy</ref>}} and Nuclear Posture Review (NPR).<ref name="ndsUnclNprMdr" />{{rp|33rd-62nd pages}}<ref>{{Cite web |last=Baron |first=Kevin |date=October 27, 2022 |title=That's it? Biden's Overdue Pentagon Strategy Underwhelms |url=https://www.defenseone.com/ideas/2022/10/s-it-bidens-overdue-pentagon-strategy-underwhelms/379030/ |access-date=2022-10-28 |website=Defense One |language=en |archive-date=October 28, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221028235629/https://www.defenseone.com/ideas/2022/10/s-it-bidens-overdue-pentagon-strategy-underwhelms/379030/ |url-status=live }} ''See Reorganization plan of United States Army for more detail'' --Note A</ref>{{efn|name=g357|1= In DoD readiness,<ref name= dodReadiness /> Joint Staff sit on the Joint Requirements Oversight Council (JROC), to advise the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.<ref name= nms2018 /><!--ref name=htar >United States Army War College and Army Force Management School [https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/AD1127933.pdf (2019-2020) How the Army Runs] HTAR: A senior leader reference handbook which synthesizes "existing and developing National, Defense, Joint, and Army systems, processes, and procedures currently practiced"</ref>{{rp|diagram on p.559}}<ref name= ar71_9 /><ref name= forceMgt >James Kennedy [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DNY4nVNSOwE (2019) Force Management Model - Complete] </ref> The commander, AFC is responsible for Force design.<ref name= ar71_9 / --> *The ''Force management'' model begins with a projection of the Future operating environment, in terms of resources: political, military, economic, social, information, infrastructure, physical environment, and the time available to bring the Current Force to bear on the situation.<!--ref name= forceMgt /--> *The JROC serves as a discussion forum of these factors.<!--ref name= ar71_9 >Headquarters, Department of the Army [https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/ARN31331-AR_71-9-000-WEB-1.pdf (29 Jun 2021) Army Regulation 71–9 Force Management. Warfighting Capabilities Determination] °1-6c, p.1) tasks for CG,AFC; °2-24 p.13) CG,AFC is a principal member of AROC, with 43 duties ''a through qq''; °3-1 ch.3 pp20-21) AROC is a forum for requirements decisions (RDF); °4-1 p.24) CG,AFC is responsible for force design; °6-4 p39) figure 6-1 Deliberate staffing and review process; ''figures for more staffing and review processes follow.'' </ref><ref name=ar71,9>Research, Development, and Acquisition [https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/pdf/web/ARN11041_AR71-9_FINAL.pdf AR 71–9 (2009) Warfighting Capabilities Determination] Aug 15, 2019 update</ref--> *The relevant strategy is provided by DoD leadership. *A DOTMLPF analysis models the factors necessary to change the Current force into a relevant Future force. *A JCIDS process identifies the gaps in capability between Current and Future force. *A ''Force design'' to meet the materiel gaps is underway. *An organization with the desired capabilities (manpower, materiel, training) is brought to bear on each gap.<ref name= dodReadiness >C. Todd Lopez, DOD News [https://www.war.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/Article/3239668/us-military-readiness-goes-beyond-just-china-russia/ (8 Dec 2022) U.S. Military Readiness Goes Beyond Just China, Russia ] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260127032728/https://www.war.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/Article/3239668/us-military-readiness-goes-beyond-just-china-russia/ |date=January 27, 2026 }}</ref> <!-- **[https://armypubs.army.mil/ProductMaps/PubForm/Details.aspx?PUB_ID=60844 AR 5-22](pdf) lists the Force modernization proponent for each Army branch, which can be a CoE or [https://usacac.army.mil/branch-proponents Branch proponent] leader. **Staff uses a Synchronization meeting<ref name= weeklyAsmForceInteg >James Kennedy, CGSC [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQUGlS5uL94 (Jun 2022) AY22 Force Integration CGSC] Weekly meetings on Change, Crisis, Competition, or Conflict. 50:31</ref>{{rp|minute 8:29 }} before seeking approval —HTAR Force Management 3-2b: "Managing change in any large, complex organization requires the synchronization of many interrelated processes".<ref name=htar />{{rp|p2-27}} --> *A budget request is submitted to Congress. *The resources are "dictated by Congress".<!--ref name= forceMgt /--> *Approved requests then await resource deliveries which then become available to the combatant commanders.<ref name= cLee >Caitlin Lee [https://warontherocks.com/2022/03/the-u-s-militarys-force-management-tug-of-war/ (23 Mar 2022) The US Military's Force Management Tug-of-War] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221130212625/https://warontherocks.com/2022/03/the-u-s-militarys-force-management-tug-of-war/ |date=November 30, 2022 }} an allocation process</ref>}}. The focus in the 2022 NDS was the "pacing threat" of China, followed by an "acute threat" of Russia.

In 2026, under the second Trump administration, the NDS was released on January 23, following the December 2025 publication of the NSS.<ref>US Department of War, (23 Jan 2026), [https://media.defense.gov/2026/Jan/23/2003864773/-1/-1/0/2026-NATIONAL-DEFENSE-STRATEGY.PDF 2026 NDS National Defense Strategy] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260514181716/https://media.defense.gov/2026/Jan/23/2003864773/-1/-1/0/2026-NATIONAL-DEFENSE-STRATEGY.PDF |date=May 14, 2026 }},</ref> The 2026 NDS's elevation of homeland and hemispheric security as the top priority for the DoD represents a major departure from previous strategies.<ref name=":0" />

==See also== *National Military Strategy *National Security Strategy (United States)

==References and notes== {{notelist}} {{reflist}}

==External links== {{Library resources box}}

* [http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/policy/dod/nds-usa_mar2005.htm National Defense Strategy, 2005] * [http://www.comw.org/qdr/fulltext/08nationaldefensestrategy.pdf National Defense Strategy, 2008] * [https://web.archive.org/web/20180119180945/https://www.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/2018-National-Defense-Strategy-Summary.pdf National Defense Strategy, 2018] * [https://media.defense.gov/2022/Oct/27/2003103845/-1/-1/1/2022-NATIONAL-DEFENSE-STRATEGY-NPR-MDR.PDF National Defense Strategy, 2022]: [https://media.defense.gov/2022/Mar/28/2002964702/-1/-1/1/NDS-FACT-SHEET.PDF unclassified fact sheet] * [https://media.defense.gov/2026/Jan/23/2003864773/-1/-1/0/2026-NATIONAL-DEFENSE-STRATEGY.PDF National Defense Strategy, 2026]

Category:United States defense policymaking Category:Military strategy Category:United States Department of Defense publications