{{Short description|none}} [[File:Mrs.Bird&MadameCostello-February24,1842NewYorkSun.jpg|thumb|230px|Indirect [[advertisements]] for abortion services, like these in ''[[The Sun (New York City)|The Sun]]'' in 1842, were common during the [[Victorian era]]. At the time, abortion was illegal in New York.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Brodie |first=Janet Farrell |title=Contraception and abortion in nineteenth-century America |publisher=[[Cornell University Press]] |location=[[Ithaca, New York]] |year=1997 |page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=Wbeoi0rGvpkC 254] |isbn=0-8014-8433-2 |oclc=37699745}}</ref>]] The practice of induced [[abortion]]—the deliberate termination of a [[pregnancy]]—has been known since [[ancient history|ancient times]]. Various methods have been used to perform or attempt abortion, including the administration of [[abortifacient]] herbs, the use of sharpened implements, the application of abdominal pressure, and other techniques. The term ''abortion'', or more precisely ''spontaneous abortion'', is sometimes used to refer to a naturally occurring condition that ends a pregnancy, that is, to what is popularly called a ''miscarriage''. But in what follows the term ''abortion'' will always refer to an induced abortion.
[[Abortion law]]s and their enforcement have fluctuated through various eras. In much of the [[Western world]] during the 20th century, [[abortion-rights movements]] were successful in having abortion bans repealed. While abortion remains legal in most of the West, this legality is regularly challenged by anti-abortion groups. The [[Soviet Union]] under [[Vladimir Lenin]] is recognized as the first modern country to legalize induced elective abortion care.<ref>{{Cite book | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=T205AAAAIAAJ&dq=lenin+soviet+first+country+abortion&pg=PA65 | isbn=978-0-521-21442-1 | title=Abortion | date=27 October 1977 | publisher=CUP Archive }}</ref> In the twentieth century [[China]] used induced abortion as part of a "one-child policy" birth control campaign in an effort to slow population growth.
==Premodern era== [[File:AngkorWatAbortionAD1150.JPG|thumb|240px|[[Bas relief]] at [[Angkor Wat]], {{circa|1150}}, depicting a [[demon]] performing an abortion upon a woman who has been sent to the underworld]] The Vedic and ''smrti'' laws of India reflected a concern with preserving the male seed of the three upper castes; and the religious courts imposed various penances for the woman or excommunication for a priest who provided an abortion.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Constantin-Iulian Damian |title=Abortion from the Perspective of Eastern Religions: Hinduism and Buddhism |journal=Romanian Journal of Bioethics |volume=8 |issue=1 |date=January–March 2010 |url=http://eng.bioetica.ro/atdoc/RRBv8n1_2010_Damian_EN.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120903233020/http://eng.bioetica.ro/atdoc/RRBv8n1_2010_Damian_EN.pdf |archive-date=2012-09-03 }}</ref> Part of the epic ''[[Ramayana]]'' describes abortion performed by barber surgeons.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Sloka & Translation {{!}} Valmiki Ramayanam |url=https://www.valmiki.iitk.ac.in/sloka?field_kanda_tid=5&language=dv&field_sarga_value=28 |access-date=2023-11-30 |website=www.valmiki.iitk.ac.in}}</ref> The only evidence of the death penalty being mandated for abortion in the ancient laws is found in [[Assyrian Law]], in the Code of Assura, c. 1075 BCE;<ref>[http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/ancient/1075assyriancode.html Ancient History Sourcebook: The Code of the Assura, c. 1075 BC ]</ref> and this is imposed only on a woman who procures an abortion against her husband's wishes. The first recorded evidence of induced abortion is from the Egyptian Ebers Papyrus in 1550 BCE.<ref name=potts>{{Cite book |last=Potts |first=Malcolm |author-link=Malcolm Potts |author2=Martha Campbell |year=2002 |chapter=History of Contraception |title=Gynecology and Obstetrics |volume=6 |url=http://big.berkeley.edu/ifplp.history.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20030701162741/http://big.berkeley.edu/ifplp.history.pdf |archive-date=2003-07-01 |access-date=2013-09-12}}{{Cite journal|last=Potts |first=Malcolm |author-link=Malcolm Potts |author2=Martha Campbell |year=2009 |title=History of Contraception |journal= The Global Library of Women's Medicine|doi = 10.3843/GLOWM.10376 | issn = 1756-2228 |url=http://www.glowm.com/?p=glowm.cml/section_view&articleid=375 |access-date=2011-09-07|url-access=subscription }}</ref>
Many of the methods employed in early cultures were non-surgical. Physical activities such as [[Manual labour|strenuous labor]], [[climbing]], [[paddling]], [[Weight training|weightlifting]], or [[Diving (sport)|diving]] were a common technique. Others included the use of irritant leaves, [[fasting]], [[bloodletting]], pouring hot water onto the abdomen, and lying on a heated [[coconut|coconut shell]].<ref name=devereux>{{Cite book|last=Devereux |first=G |editor=Harold Rosen |title=Abortion in America: Medical, psychiatric, legal, anthropological, and religious considerations |year=1967 |publisher=[[Beacon Press]] |location=[[Boston, Massachusetts]] |oclc=187445 |chapter=A typological study of abortion in 350 primitive, ancient, and pre-industrial societies}}</ref> In virtually all cultures, abortion techniques developed through observation, adaptation of obstetrical methods, and [[transculturation]].<ref>{{cite book|last=Devereux|first=George|title=A Study of Abortion in Primitive Societies|publisher=International Universities Press|year=1976|isbn=978-0-8236-6245-6|url=https://archive.org/details/studyofabortioni00deve}}</ref> Physical means of inducing abortion, including [[Battery (crime)|battery]], [[Physical exercise|exercise]], and tightening the [[girdle]] were still often used as late as the [[Early Modern Period]] among English women.<ref name="mcfarlane">{{Cite book|first=Alan |last=Macfarlane |author-link=Alan Macfarlane |year=2002 |chapter=Abortion methods in England |chapter-url=http://www.alanmacfarlane.com/savage/A-ABORT.PDF |title=The Savage Wars of Peace |publisher=[[Palgrave Macmillan]] |location=[[Basingstoke]] |isbn=1-4039-0432-4 |oclc=50714989 |access-date=2008-12-13}}</ref>
[[Archaeology|Archaeological]] discoveries indicate early [[surgery|surgical]] attempts at the extraction of a [[fetus]]; however, such methods are not believed to have been common, given the infrequency with which they are mentioned in ancient medical texts.<ref name=doerfler1997>{{cite web|first=Stephanie |last=Doerfler |title=Abortion |url=http://www.unc.edu/courses/rometech/public/content/special/Stephanie_Doerfler/Abortion.html |access-date=2008-12-10 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070629085332/http://www.unc.edu/courses/rometech/public/content/special/Stephanie_Doerfler/Abortion.html |archive-date=June 29, 2007 }}</ref>
An 8th-century [[Sanskrit]] text instructs women wishing to induce an abortion to sit over a pot of steam or stewed [[onion]]s.<ref name=yale/> The technique of [[massage]] abortion, involving the application of pressure to the pregnant [[abdomen]], has been practiced in [[Southeast Asia]] for centuries. One of the [[bas relief]]s decorating the temple of [[Angkor Wat]] in [[Cambodia]], dated {{circa|1150}}, depicts a [[demon]] performing such an abortion upon a woman who has been sent to the [[underworld]].<ref name=potts/>
Japanese documents show records of induced abortion from as early as the 12th century. It became much more prevalent during the [[Edo period]], especially among the peasant class, who were hit hardest by the recurrent [[famine]]s and high taxation of the age.<ref name=japan1>{{Cite journal|author=Obayashi M |title=[Historical background of the acceptance of induced abortion] |language=ja |journal=Josanpu Zasshi |volume=36 |issue=12 |pages=1011–6 |date=December 1982 |pmid=6759734 }}</ref> [[Statue]]s of the [[Boddhisattva]] [[Ksitigarbha|Jizo]], erected in memory of an abortion, [[miscarriage]], [[stillbirth]], or young childhood death, began appearing at least as early as 1710 at a [[temple]] in [[Yokohama]] (see [[religion and abortion]]).<ref name="japan2">{{Cite journal|first=Anne Page |last=Brookes |date=September–December 1981 |title=Mizuko kuyō and Japanese Buddhism |journal=Japanese Journal of Religious Studies |volume=8 |issue=3–4 |pages=119–47 |url=http://www.nanzan-u.ac.jp/SHUBUNKEN/publications/jjrs/pdf/135.pdf |access-date=2008-12-13 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20040503125604/http://www.nanzan-u.ac.jp/SHUBUNKEN/publications/jjrs/pdf/135.pdf |archive-date=2004-05-03 }}</ref>
The native [[Māori people|Māori]] people of New Zealand [[History of New Zealand|colonisation]] terminated pregnancies via miscarriage-inducing drugs, ceremonial methods, and girding of the abdomen with a restrictive [[Belt (clothing)|belt]].<ref name=maori1>{{Cite journal|author=Hunton RB |title=Maori abortion practices in pre and early European New Zealand |journal=[[The New Zealand Medical Journal]] |volume=86 |issue=602 |pages=567–70 |date=December 1977 |pmid=273782 }}</ref> Another source claims that the Māori people did not practice abortion, for fear of [[Makutu]], but did attempt abortion through the [[induction (birth)|artificial induction]] of [[premature labor]].<ref name=maori2>{{Cite journal|author=Gluckman LK |title=Abortion in the nineteenth century Maori: a historical and ethnopsychiatric review |journal=[[The New Zealand Medical Journal]] |volume=93 |issue=685 |pages=384–6 |date=June 1981 |pmid=7019788 }}</ref>
===Greco-Roman world=== [[File:Silphium.jpg|thumb|right|160px|[[Cyrene, Libya|Cyrenian]] [[coin]] with an image of [[silphium]], a contraceptive plant, but could also have been an [[abortifacient]]]] Much of what is known about the [[Surgery in Ancient Rome|methods and practice]] of abortion in [[Ancient Greece|Greek]] and [[Roman Empire|Roman]] history comes from early classical texts. Abortion, as a gynecological procedure, was primarily the province of women who were either midwives or well-informed laypeople. In his ''Theaetetus'', [[Plato]] mentions a midwife's ability to induce abortion in the early stages of pregnancy.<ref name=past>{{Cite journal|last=Depierri |first=Kate P. |date=March 1968 |title=One Way of Unearthing the Past |journal=The American Journal of Nursing |volume=68 |issue=3 |pages=521–524 |doi=10.2307/3453443 |pmid=4865614 |publisher=Lippincott Williams &|jstor=3453443 }}</ref><ref>[[Plato]] (1921) [{{circa|369 BC}}]. [https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/ptext?lookup=Plat.+Theaet.+149d "149d"]. ''[[Theaetetus (dialogue)|Theaetetus]]''. in Harold North Fowler. ''Plato in Twelve Volumes''. '''12'''. [[Cambridge, Massachusetts]]: [[Harvard University Press]].</ref> It is thought unlikely that abortion was punished in Ancient Greece.<ref name="christianperspectives"/> A fragment attributed to the poet Lysias "suggests that abortion was a crime in Athens against the husband, if his wife was pregnant when he died, since his unborn child could have claimed the estate."<ref name=OCD />
The ancient Greeks relied upon the herb [[silphium]] as an abortifacient and contraceptive. The plant, as the chief export of [[Cyrene, Libya|Cyrene]], was driven to [[extinction]]; it is suggested that it might have possessed the same abortive properties, as some of its closest extant relatives in the family [[Apiaceae]]. Silphium was so central to the Cyrenian economy that most of its [[coin]]s were embossed with an image of the plant.<ref name="PlinyXXII">Pliny, [https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/ptext?lookup=Plin.+Nat.+22.49 XXII, Ch. 49]</ref> [[Pliny the Elder]] (23–79 CE) cited the refined oil of [[common rue]] as a potent abortifacient. [[Serenus Sammonicus]] wrote of a concoction which consisted of rue, [[egg (food)|egg]], and [[dill]]. Soranus, Dioscorides, [[Oribasius]] also detailed this application of the plant. Modern scientific studies have confirmed that rue indeed contains three abortive compounds.<ref name=rue>{{cite web|first=W. Jeffrey |last=Hurst |author2=Deborah J. Hurst |url=http://www.ucl.ac.uk/~ucgajpd/medicina%20antiqua/sa_rue.html |title=Rue (Ruta Graveolens) |access-date=2008-12-10 |work=Medicina Antiqua |publisher=The Wellcome Trust Centre for the History of Medicine at UCL}}</ref> [[Aristolochia|Birthwort]], a herb used to ease [[childbirth]], was also used to induce abortion. [[Galen]] included it in a potion formula in ''de Antidotis'', while Dioscorides said it could be administered by mouth, or in the form of a [[vagina]]l pessary also containing [[black pepper|pepper]] and [[myrrh]].<ref>{{Cite book|last=Riddle |first=John M. |author-link=John M. Riddle |title=Eve's Herbs: A History of Contraception and Abortion in the West |publisher=Harvard University Press |location=Cambridge |year=1999 |isbn=0-674-27026-6 |oclc=46766844}}{{Page needed|date=September 2010}}</ref>
The Greek playwright [[Aristophanes]] noted the abortifacient property of pennyroyal in 421 BCE, through a humorous reference in his [[comedy]], ''[[Peace (play)|Peace]].''<ref name=pennyroyal/> [[Hippocrates]] (c. 460 – c. 370 BCE), the [[Greek people|Greek]] physician, would advise a [[prostitute]] who became pregnant to jump up and down, touching her buttocks with her heels at each leap, so as to induce miscarriage.<ref name=lefkowitz1992>{{Cite book|last=Lefkowitz |first=Mary R. |author-link=Mary Lefkowitz |author2=Maureen R. Fant |title=Women's life in Greece & Rome: A source book in translation |publisher=Johns Hopkins University Press |location=Baltimore |year=1992 |page=341 |isbn=0-8018-4475-4 |chapter=Intercourse, conception and pregnancy |chapter-url=http://www.stoa.org/diotima/anthology/wlgr/wlgr-medicine341.shtml |access-date=2008-09-21}}</ref> Other writings attributed to him describe instruments fashioned to dilate the [[cervix]] and [[curette]] inside of the [[uterus]].<ref name=hippocrates>{{Cite book|last=Klotz |first=John William |title=A Christian view of abortion |publisher=[[Concordia Publishing House]] |location=[[St. Louis, Missouri]] |year=1973 |isbn=0-570-06721-9 |oclc=750046 |chapter=A Historical Summary of Abortion from Antiquity through Legalization |chapter-url=http://www.lcms.org/graphics/assets/media/WRHC/187_A%20Historical%20Summary%20of%20Abortion.PDF |access-date=2008-09-21}}</ref>
[[Soranus (Greek physician)|Soranus]], a 2nd-century Greek physician, prescribed [[diuretic]]s, [[emmenagogue]]s, [[enemas]], fasting, and bloodletting as safe abortion methods, although he advised against the use of sharp instruments to induce miscarriage, due to the risk of organ [[perforation]]. He also advised women wishing to abort their pregnancies to engage in energetic walking, carrying heavy objects, riding animals, and jumping so that the woman's heels were to touch her buttocks with each jump, which he described as the "Lacedaemonian Leap".<ref name=lefkowitz1992/><ref>Soranus. ''Gynaecology.'' 1.59–65.</ref> He also offered a number of recipes for herbal baths, rubs, and [[pessary|pessaries]].<ref name=lefkowitz1992/> In ''[[Materia Medica|De Materia Medica Libri Quinque]]'', the Greek [[pharmacologist]] [[Pedanius Dioscorides|Dioscorides]] listed the ingredients of a draught called "abortion wine"– [[hellebore]], [[cucurbitaceae|squirting cucumber]], and [[scammony]]– but failed to provide the precise manner in which it was to be prepared.<ref name=riddle1992/> Hellebore, in particular, is known to be [[abortifacient]].<ref name=hellebore>{{cite web|first=W. Jeffrey |last=Hurst |author2=Deborah J. Hurst |url=http://www.ucl.ac.uk/~ucgajpd/medicina%20antiqua/sa_hellebore.html |title=Hellebore |access-date=2008-12-10 |work=Medicina Antiqua |publisher=The Wellcome Trust Centre for the History of Medicine at UCL}}</ref>
[[Tertullian]], a 2nd- and 3rd-century [[Christianity|Christian]] [[theology|theologian]], described surgical implements which were used in a procedure similar to the modern [[dilation and evacuation]]. One tool had a "nicely adjusted flexible frame" used for dilation, an "annular blade" used to curette, and a "blunted or covered hook" used for extraction. The other was a "copper needle or spike". He attributed ownership of such items to Hippocrates, [[Asclepiades of Bithynia|Asclepiades]], [[Erasistratus]], [[Herophilus]], and [[Soranus (Greek Physician)|Soranus]].<ref name=tertullian>[[Tertullian]] (1885) [{{circa|lk=no|203}}]. [http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf03.iv.xi.xxv.html "Tertullian Refutes, Physiologically, the Notion that the Soul is Introduced After Birth"]. ''A Treatise on the Soul''. in [[Philip Schaff]]. ''[[Ante-Nicene Fathers (book)|Ante-Nicene Fathers]]''. '''3'''. [[Edinburgh]]: [[T&T Clark]].</ref>
[[Aulus Cornelius Celsus]], a 1st-century [[Ancient Rome|Roman]] [[Encyclopedia|encyclopedist]], offered an extremely detailed account of a procedure to extract an already-dead fetus in his only surviving work, ''De Medicina''.<ref name=celsus>{{Cite book|author=Celsus|author-link=Celsus|year=1935 |editor=W. G. Spencer |title=De medicina |chapter=Prooemium |chapter-url=https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Celsus/7*.html |access-date=2008-12-13 |page=457 |publisher=Heinemann |location=London |oclc=186696262}}</ref> In Book 9 of ''[[Refutation of all Heresies]]'', [[Hippolytus of Rome]], another Christian theologian of the 3rd century, wrote of women tightly binding themselves around the middle so as to "expel what was being conceived".<ref name=hippolytus>[[Hippolytus of Rome|Hippolytus]] ({{circa|lk=no|1870}}). [http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf05.iii.iii.vii.viii.html "The Personal History of Callistus; His Occupation ..."]. ''[[Refutation of all Heresies]]''. in Alexander Roberts and [[James Donaldson (classical scholar)|James Donaldson]]. ''[[Ante-Nicene Fathers (book)|Ante-Nicene Fathers]]''. '''5'''. [[Edinburgh]]: [[T&T Clark]].</ref>
===Natural abortifacients=== [[File:Medievalpreg.jpg|thumb|right|210px|Art from a 13th-century [[illuminated manuscript]] features a [[herbalism|herbalist]] preparing a concoction containing [[Mentha pulegium|pennyroyal]] for a woman.]] [[Herbalism|Botanical preparation]]s reputed to be abortifacient were common in [[classics|classical literature]] and [[folk medicine]]. Such folk remedies, however, varied in [[efficacy|effectiveness]] and were not without the risk of [[Adverse effect (medicine)|adverse effects]]. Some of the [[herb]]s used at times to terminate pregnancy are [[poison]]ous.
A list of plants which cause abortion was provided in ''[[Macer Floridus|De viribus herbarum]]'', an 11th-century [[herbal]] written in the form of a [[poem]], the authorship of which is incorrectly attributed to [[Aemilius Macer]]. Among them were rue, [[Nepeta|Italian catnip]], [[Savory (herb)|savory]], [[Common sage|sage]], [[soapwort]], [[cyperus]], white and black hellebore, and [[Mentha pulegium|pennyroyal]].<ref name=riddle1992/> [[Medicine in medieval Islam|Physicians in the Islamic world]] during the medieval period documented the use of [[abortifacient]]s, commenting on their effectiveness and prevalence.<ref name=shaikh2003>{{Cite book |first=Sa'diyya |last=Shaikh |chapter=Family Planning, Contraception, and Abortion in Islam: Undertaking ''Khilafa'' |editor=Daniel C. Maguire |title=Sacred Rights: The Case for Contraception and Abortion in World Religions |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |location=[[Oxford]] |year=2003 |pages=[https://archive.org/details/sacredrightscase0000magu/page/107 107] |isbn=0-19-516001-0 |oclc=50080419 |chapter-url=https://archive.org/details/sacredrightscase0000magu/page/107 }}</ref>
Colonial Americans were advised to use careful measurements in a recipe by [[Benjamin Franklin]] for an abortifacient. He used the recipe as an example in a book he published to teach mathematics and many useful skills, and calls the recipe a solution to "the misfortune" of an unwanted pregnancy for "unmarry'd women".<ref>Farrell, Molly, ''[https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2022/05/ben-franklin-american-instructor-textbook-abortion-recipe.html Ben Franklin Put an Abortion Recipe in His Math Textbook: To colonial Americans, termination was as normal as the ABCs and 123s]'', [[Slate (magazine)|Slate]], May 5, 2022</ref> Franklin was following a tradition that had existed in England and Europe.
''[[King's American Dispensatory]]'' of 1898 recommended a mixture of [[brewer's yeast]] and pennyroyal tea as "a safe and certain abortive".<ref>{{Cite book|last=Felter |first=Harvey Wickes |author-link=Harvey Wickes Felter |author2=John Uri Lloyd |author2-link=John Uri Lloyd |title=King's American Dispensatory |access-date=2008-12-11 |chapter=Hedeoma (U. S. P.)—Hedeoma |chapter-url=http://www.henriettesherbal.com/eclectic/kings/hedeoma.html |year=1854|title-link=King's American Dispensatory }}</ref> Pennyroyal has been known to cause complications when used as an abortifacient. In 1978 a pregnant woman from Colorado died after consuming 2 [[tablespoon]]fuls of pennyroyal [[essential oil]]<ref>[https://archive.today/20120718040231/http://www.annals.org/content/124/8/726.full.pdf+html Pennyroyal poisoning]</ref><ref>[http://www.metroactive.com/papers/metro/12.14.95/pennyroyal-9550.html Colorado death]</ref> which is known to be [[toxicity|toxic]].<ref name=toxic>{{cite web|author=MedLinePlus|author-link=Medlineplus|title=American pennyroyal (Hedeoma pulegioides L.), European pennyroyal (Mentha pulegium L.) |url=https://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/druginfo/natural/patient-pennyroyal.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060125125147/http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/druginfo/natural/patient-pennyroyal.html |archive-date=January 25, 2006 |access-date=2009-05-05}}</ref> In 1994 a pregnant woman, unaware of an [[ectopic pregnancy]] that needed immediate medical care, drank a tea containing pennyroyal [[concentrate|extract]] to induce abortion without medical help. She later died as a result of the untreated ectopic pregnancy, mistaking the [[symptoms]] for the abortifacient working.<ref name=pennyroyal>{{Cite news|first=Gordon |last=Young |title=Lifestyle on Trial |url=http://www.metroactive.com/papers/metro/12.14.95/pennyroyal-9550.html |work=[[Metro Silicon Valley|Metro]] |date=December 1995 |access-date=2008-06-25}}</ref>
For thousands of years, [[tansy]] has been taken in early pregnancy to restore menstruation.<ref>{{cite journal |journal=The Medical Magazine |title =Fatal Poisoning by Oil of Tansy |author=Charles T. Hildreth, MD |date=November 1834 |volume=3 |number=7 |page=213 |publisher=William D. Ticknor |location=Boston |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=-hugAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA213 |quote=From the days of Aristotle to the present time, a certain class of medical writers have recommended this plant as safe, and more or less efficacious, in cases involving a suppression of the catamenia.}} (''Catamenia'' is blood or other material discharged from the uterus during menstruation.)</ref> It was first documented as an [[emmenagogue]] in [[Hildegard of Bingen|St. Hildegard of Bingen's]] ''De simplicis medicinae''.<ref name=riddle1992/>
A variety of [[juniper]], known as [[Juniperus sabina|savin]], was mentioned frequently in European writings.<ref name=potts/> In one case in England, a [[Rector (ecclesiastical)|rector]] from [[Essex]] was said to have procured it for a woman he had impregnated in 1574; in another, a man advised his pregnant girlfriend to use [[hellebore|black hellebore]] and savin be boiled together and drunk in [[milk]], or else chopped [[Rubia|madder]] boiled in [[beer]]. Other substances reputed to have been used by the English include [[Lytta vesicatoria|Spanish fly]], [[opium]], [[watercress]] seed, [[Iron(II) sulfate|iron sulphate]], and iron chloride. Another mixture, not abortifacient, but rather intended to relieve [[Miscarriage#Missed abortion (O02.1)|missed abortion]], contained [[Dictamnus|dittany]], [[hyssop]], and hot water.<ref name=mcfarlane/>
The root of [[Dryopteris filix-mas|worm fern]], called "prostitute root" in French, was used in France and Germany; it was also recommended by a Greek physician in the 1st century. In [[German people|German]] folk medicine, there was also an abortifacient [[tea]], which included [[marjoram]], [[thyme]], [[parsley]], and [[lavender]]. Other preparations of unspecified origin included crushed [[ant]]s, the saliva of [[camel]]s, and the tail hairs of [[black-tailed deer]] dissolved in the fat of [[bear]]s.<ref name=yale>{{cite web|first=Kathleen |last=London |url=http://www.yale.edu/ynhti/curriculum/units/1982/6/82.06.03.x.html |year=1982 |title=The History of Birth Control |work=The Changing American Family: Historical and Comparative Perspectives |access-date=2008-12-10 |publisher=[[Yale University]]}}</ref>
===Attitudes towards abortion=== The [[Stoicism|Stoics]] believed the fetus to be plantlike in nature, and not an animal until the moment of birth, when it finally breathed air. They therefore found abortion morally acceptable.<ref name=OCD/><ref name="DGRA">{{cite encyclopedia | last = Long | first = George | author-link = George Long (scholar) | title = Abortio | editor = William Smith | editor-link = William Smith (lexicographer) | encyclopedia = [[Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities]] | volume = 1 | page = 2 | publisher = [[Little, Brown and Company]] | location = Boston | year = 1870 | url = http://www.ancientlibrary.com/smith-dgra/0009.html | url-status = usurped | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20100213213407/http://www.ancientlibrary.com/smith-dgra/0009.html | archive-date = 2010-02-13 }}</ref>
[[Aristotle]] wrote that, "[T]he line between lawful and unlawful abortion will be marked by the fact of having sensation and being alive."<ref>{{Cite book|author=Aristotle|author-link=Aristotle|chapter=[[Politics (Aristotle)|Politics]] |editor=H. Rackham |title=Aristotle in 23 Volumes |volume=21 |publisher=[[Harvard University Press]] |location=[[Cambridge, Massachusetts]] |year=1944 |orig-date=c. 325 BC |page=[https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text.jsp?doc=Perseus:text:1999.01.0058:book%3D7:section%3D1335b 7.1335b] |isbn=0-674-99291-1 |oclc=29752140 }}</ref> Before that point was reached, Aristotle did not regard abortion as the killing of something human.<ref name=bioethics>[https://books.google.com/books?id=6HZ2aOV2BSQC&dq=thomas+aquinas+abortion&pg=PA5 A companion to bioethics] By Helga Kuhse, Peter Singer</ref><ref name=religioustolerance>{{usurped|1=[https://web.archive.org/web/19970718201047/http://religioustolerance.org/abo_hist.htm ReligiousTolerance.org]}}</ref><ref>[https://archive.org/details/privatemoralityi0000boer/page/273 <!-- quote=Hippocratic oath abortion. --> W. den Boer, ''Private Morality in Greece and Rome'' (Brill 1979] {{ISBN|978-90-04-05976-4}}), p. 272</ref> Aristotle considered the embryo to [[Ensoulment|gain a human soul]] at 40 days if male and 90 days if female; before that, it had vegetable and animal souls.
The [[Hippocratic oath|Oath]], ascribed to [[Hippocrates]], forbade the use of [[Pessary|pessaries]] to induce abortion. Modern scholarship suggests that pessaries were banned because they were reported to cause vaginal ulcers.<ref name=riddle1991>{{Cite journal|last=Riddle |first=John M. |author-link=John M. Riddle |title=Oral contraceptives and early-term abortifacients during classical antiquity and the Middle Ages |journal=Past & Present |issue=132 |pages=3–32 |date=August 1991 |pmid=11656135 |doi=10.1093/past/132.1.3 |jstor=650819 }} "Contrary to popular opinion, the ancient Hippocratic Oath did not prohibit abortions; the oath prohibited 'vaginal suppositories' presumably because of the ulcerations they were said to cause." Riddle is citing Soranus, p.13.</ref> This specific prohibition has been interpreted by some medical scholars as prohibiting abortion in a broader sense than by pessary.<ref name=riddle1992>{{Cite book|last=Riddle |first=John M. |author-link=John M. Riddle |title=Contraception and abortion from the ancient world to the Renaissance |publisher=Harvard University Press |location=Cambridge |year=1992 |isbn=0-674-16875-5 |oclc=24428750}}{{Page needed|date=September 2010}}</ref>
One such interpretation was by [[Scribonius Largus]], a Roman medical writer: "Hippocrates, who founded our profession, laid the foundation for our discipline by an oath in which it was proscribed not to give a pregnant woman a kind of medicine that expels the embryo or fetus."<ref name=scribonius>Scribonius, '' Compositiones '' Praef. 5. 20–23 (Translated and cited in Riddle's history of contraception and abortion)</ref> Other medical scholars disagree, believing that Hippocrates sought to discourage physicians from trying dangerous methods to abort a fetus.<ref name="Management of Abortion, page 2">{{cite book|isbn=978-1-4443-1293-5|page=[https://archive.org/details/managementuninte00paul/page/n21 2]|publisher=[[John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.]]|year=2009|location=[[Oxford, United Kingdom]]|title=Management of Unintended and Abnormal Pregnancy|url=https://archive.org/details/managementuninte00paul|url-access=limited|edition=1st|editor=M Paul|editor2=ES Lichtenberg|editor3=L Borgatta|editor4=DA Grimes|editor5=PG Stubblefield|editor6=MD Creinin|first=Carole|last=Joffe}}</ref> This may be born out by the fact that the oath originally also prohibited ''[[surgery]]'' (at the time, it was far more dangerous, and [[surgeon]]s were a separate profession from [[physician]]s).<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/article/hippocratic-oath-today/|title = The Hippocratic Oath Today|website = [[PBS]]| date=27 March 2001 }}</ref>
Soranus acknowledges two parties among physicians: those who would not perform abortions, citing the Hippocratic Oath, and the other party, his own. Soranus recommended abortion in cases involving health complications as well as emotional immaturity, and provided detailed suggestions in his work ''Gynecology''.<ref name=Largus>[http://penelope.uchicago.edu/~grout/encyclopaedia_romana/aconite/largus.html "Scribonius Largus"]</ref><ref name=Soranus>{{cite book|author=Soranus, Owsei Temkin|title=Soranus' Gynecology|date=1956|publisher=JHU Press|location=I.19.60|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=YsKWfh31gxwC&q=soranus%20gynecology%20digital&pg=PR1|access-date=6 October 2015|isbn=978-0-8018-4320-4}}</ref>
In the [[Roman Republic]] and [[Principate]], abortion was punished only when it violated the [[patria potestas|father's right]] to make decisions about rearing his offspring.<ref name="christianperspectives">[https://books.google.com/books?id=fVZXBeNCffwC Johannes M. Röskamp, ''Christian Perspectives On Abortion-Legislation In Past And Present'' (GRIN Verlag 2005] {{ISBN|978-3-640-56931-1}}</ref>{{rp|3}} The [[Stoicism|Stoics]] did not view the fetus as a person, and the Romans did not punish abortion as homicide.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=gcRwR2skwr4C&dq=christianity+stoicism+abortion&pg=PA19 Jeffrey H. Reiman, ''Abortion and the Ways We Value Life'' (Rowman and Littlefield 1998] {{ISBN|978-0-8476-9208-8}}), p, 19</ref> Following a [[Divorce in ancient Rome|divorce]], a pregnant woman could choose to have an abortion based on the view that "the embryo formed part of the mother's own organs."<ref>[[Mireille Corbier]], "Divorce and Adoption as Familial Strategies," ''Marriage, Divorce, and Children in Ancient Rome'' (Oxford University Press, 1991, 1996 pb), edited by [[Beryl Rawson]], p. 65.</ref> Although abortion was commonly accepted in the [[Roman Empire]], around 211 AD the emperors [[Septimius Severus]] and [[Caracalla]] banned abortion as infringing on parental rights; temporary exile was the punishment.<ref name=OCD>{{Citation | last = Sallares| first = J. Robert| contribution =abortion | page =1 | editor-last1 = Hornblower | editor-first1 = Simon | editor-last2 = Spawforth | editor-first2 = Anthony | title = The Oxford Classical Dictionary | publisher = OxfordUP | place = Oxford | date = 2003 | edition=3rd | isbn=978-0-19-860641-3 }}</ref>
The 3rd-century legal compilation ''Pauli sententiae'' (attributed to [[Julius Paulus]]) wrote: "Those who give an abortifacient or a love potion, and do not do this deceitfully, nevertheless, [because] this sets a bad example, the ''humiliores'' will be banned to a mine, and the ''honestiores'' will be banned to an island after having forfeited (part of) their property, and if on account of that a woman or man perishes, then they [Pharr: the giver] will receive the death penalty."<ref>''Pauli sententiae'', PS 5.23.14 (BA PS 5.25.8).</ref> Paulus distinguishes between punishments for the upper and lower classes ([[Honestiores and humiliores|''honestiores'' and ''humiliores'']]) but seems to refer more to the killing of the woman who takes the abortifacient rather than to the killing of the fetus itself.
The Roman jurist [[Ulpian]] wrote in the ''Digest'': "An unborn child is considered being born, as far as it concerns his profits," meaning that in [[Inheritance law in ancient Rome|Roman inheritance law]] a [[posthumous child]] was entitled to the same share of its predeceased father's estate as children born before his death.{{citation needed|date=May 2024}} Abortion continued to be practiced "with little or no sense of shame".<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Hopkins |first=Keith |date=October 1965 |title=Contraception in the Roman Empire |journal=Comparative Studies in Society and History |volume=8 |issue=1 |pages=124–151 |doi=10.1017/S0010417500003935 |jstor=177539|s2cid=146352490 }} "We know that Romans practiced abortion with little or no sense of shame." Hopkins cites R. Hähnel's ''Der künstliche Abortus in Altertum'', p. 127.</ref>
====Christianity==== {{Main|History of Christian thought on abortion}}
{{Abortion in the Catholic Church}} The early Christian work called the [[Didache]] (before 100 AD) says: "do not murder a child by abortion or kill a new-born infant."<ref name="didache">{{Cite book|editor=Cyril Charles Richardson |title=Early Christian Fathers |orig-date=c. 150 |access-date=2008-12-12 |year=1953 |publisher=Westminster Press |location=Philadelphia |oclc=832987 |chapter=Didache |chapter-url=http://www.ccel.org/ccel/richardson/fathers.viii.i.iii.html}}</ref> [[Tertullian]], a 2nd- and 3rd-century [[Christianity|Christian]] [[theology|theologian]], argued that abortion should be performed only in cases in which abnormal [[pelvimetry|positioning]] of the fetus in the womb would endanger the life of the pregnant woman. [[Saint Augustine]], in ''[[Enchiridion of Augustine|Enchiridion]]'', makes passing mention of surgical procedures being performed to remove fetuses which have [[Perinatal mortality|died in utero]].<ref name="Enchiridion 85">[[Augustine of Hippo|Augustine]] (1885) [{{circa|lk=no|420}}]. [http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf103.iv.ii.lxxxvii.html "The Case of Abortive Conceptions"]. ''[[Enchiridion of Augustine|Enchiridion]]''. in [[Philip Schaff]]. ''[[Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers]]''. '''3'''. [[Edinburgh]]: [[T&T Clark]].</ref>
Saint Augustine believed that abortion of a ''fetus animatus'', a fetus with human limbs and shape, was murder. However, his beliefs on earlier-stage abortion were similar to Aristotle's,<ref name=Augustine>{{cite web|url=http://www.religioustolerance.org/abo_hist.htm |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/19970718201047/http://religioustolerance.org/abo_hist.htm |url-status=usurped |archive-date=July 18, 1997 |title=Roman Catholicism and abortion access: Pagan & Christian beliefs 400 BC −1980 AD |first=B. A. |last=Robinson |publisher=[[Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance]] |date=2000-05-28 |access-date=2008-12-09}}</ref> though he could neither deny nor affirm whether such partially formed fetuses would be resurrected as full people at the time of the Second Coming.<ref name="Enchiridion 78">[[Augustine of Hippo|Augustine]] (1885) [{{circa|lk=no|420}}]. [http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf103.iv.ii.lxxx.html "What Sins are Trivial and What Heinous is a Matter for God's Judgment"]. ''[[Enchiridion of Augustine|Enchiridion]]''. in [[Philip Schaff]]. ''[[Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers]]''. '''3'''. [[Edinburgh]]: [[T&T Clark]].</ref> * "Now who is there that is not rather disposed to think that unformed abortions perish, like seeds that have never fructified?"<ref name="Enchiridion 85"/> * "And therefore the following question may be very carefully inquired into and discussed by learned men, though I do not know whether it is in man's power to resolve it: At what time the infant begins to live in the womb: whether life exists in a latent form before it manifests itself in the motions of the living being. To deny that the young who are cut out limb by limb from the womb, lest if they were left there dead the mother should die too, have never been alive, seems too audacious."<ref name="Enchiridion 86">[[Augustine of Hippo|Augustine]] (1885) [{{circa|lk=no|420}}]. [http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf103.iv.ii.lxxxviii.html "If They Have Ever Lived, They Must of Course Have Died, and Therefore, Shall Have a Share in the Resurrection of the Dead"]. ''[[Enchiridion of Augustine|Enchiridion]]''. in [[Philip Schaff]]. ''[[Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers]]''. '''3'''. [[Edinburgh]]: [[T&T Clark]].</ref>
The ''[[Leges Henrici Primi]]'', written c. 1115, prescribes compensation for a woman or her relatives if another person causes her to miscarry, and prescribes penance (3 years if the abortion occurs before quickening, 7 years after quickening) if the pregnant woman aborts her pregnancy; the latter punishment applied only to women whose abortion resulted from a desire to conceal illicit sex.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Spivack|first=Carla|title=To "Bring Down the Flowers": The Cultural Context of Abortion Law in Early Modern England |journal=William and Mary Journal of Women and the Law|volume=14|year=2007|pages=107–151| url=https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmjowl/vol14/iss1/4}}</ref>{{rp|130–131}} "Quickening", a term often used interchangeably with "ensoulment" or "animation", was associated with the first movement of the fetus in utero. This movement is generally felt by women sometime in the third to fifth month of pregnancy. [[Midwife|Midwives]] who performed abortions were accused of committing [[witchcraft]] in ''[[Malleus Maleficarum]]'' (''The Hammer of Witches''), published in 1487 as a [[witch-hunt]]ing manual in Germany.<ref name="malleus">{{Cite book|first=Heinrich |last=Institoris |author-link=Heinrich Kramer |author2=Jakob Sprenger |author2-link=Jakob Sprenger |editor=Montague Summers |editor-link=Montague Summers |title=The Malleus maleficarum of Heinrich Kramer and James Sprenger |publisher=[[Dover Publications]] |location=[[New York City]] |year=1971 |page=[https://archive.org/details/malleusmaleficar00inst/page/66 [https://books.google.com/books?id=j0S4Q5mjS7gC&printsec=frontcover&cad=0#PPA66,M1 66]] |isbn=0-486-22802-9 |oclc=246623 |orig-date=1487 |url=https://archive.org/details/malleusmaleficar00inst/page/66 }}</ref>
In 1591, [[Pope Gregory XIV]] published new regulations in the apostolic constitution ''Sedes Apostolica''{{Efn|The relevant part of this constitution is reproduced in {{Cite book|title=Codicis Iuris Canonici Fontes|publisher=Typis Polyglottis Vaticanis|others=(ref. given for the constitution: Bull. Rom., tom. 5, I, p. 275, 276)|year=1926|editor-last=Gasparri|editor-first=Pietro|editor-link=Pietro Gasparri|volume=I:1–364|location=Rome|pages=330–331|chapter=173. Gregorius XIV, const. ''Sedes Apostolica'', 31 maii 1591.|access-date=2020-06-05|chapter-url=https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k9737552z/f335.image.texteImage}}|name=sedes|group=}} (published on 31 May 1591), limiting the punishments to abortion of a "formed" fetus:<ref name=":2">[https://books.google.com/books?id=gV6W8z4ojSoC&dq=%22sixtus+v%22+%22gregory+XIV%22+murder&pg=PA91 Nicholas Terpstra, ''Lost Girls: Sex and Death in Renaissance Florence'' (Johns Hopkins University Press 2010] {{ISBN|978-0-8018-9499-2}}), p. 91</ref><ref>{{Cite book|last=Sobiech|first=Frank|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=NwaPDAAAQBAJ&q=CONSTITUTIO+APOSTOLICA+Sedes+apostolica+gregorio+XIV&pg=PA112|title=Ethos, Bioethics, and Sexual Ethics in Work and Reception of the Anatomist Niels Stensen (1638–1686): Circulation of Love|date=2016-06-25|publisher=Springer|isbn=978-3-319-32912-3|page=112|language=en|chapter=2.3 Between Medicine and theology [2.3.1.5 Simultaneous Ensoulment Versus Successive Ensoulment of the Embryo]}}</ref> "When abortion was neither 'an issue of homicide or of an animate fetus,' Gregory thought it 'more useful' to return to the less-harsh penalties [for early abortion] of the holy [[Canon (canon law)|canons]] and [[Secular law|profane laws]]: those who abort an ''inanimatus'' [soulless] will not be guilty of true homicide because they have not killed a human being in actuality; clerics involved in abortions will have committed mortal sin but will not incur [[Impediment (Catholic canon law)#Irregularities|irregularity]]".<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Christopoulos|first=John|date=2012|title=Abortion and the Confessional in Counter-Reformation Italy|journal=Renaissance Quarterly|volume=65|issue=2|pages=443–484 (p. 474)|doi=10.1086/667257|jstor=10.1086/667257|s2cid=142588594|issn=0034-4338}}</ref> After 1591, Gregory's ''Sedes apostolica'' "remained in effect for almost three centuries, being revised only in 1869 by Pius IX".<ref name="Connery">{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=XvqRAAAAIAAJ&q=catholic+history+of+abortion |isbn=978-0-8294-0257-5 |date=1977 |publisher=Loyola University Press |title=Abortion, the development of the Roman Catholic perspective |first1=John R |last1=Connery}}</ref>{{rp|148}} With his 1869 bull ''[[Apostolicae Sedis moderationi]]'', [[Pope Pius IX]] rescinded Gregory XIV's not-yet-animated fetus exception with regard to the spiritual penalty of excommunication.<ref>"Excommunicationi latae sententiae Episcopis sive Ordinariis reservatae subiacere declaramus: ... 2. Procurantes abortum, effectu sequuto" ([https://www.vatican.va//archive/ass/documents/ASS-05-1869-70-ocr.pdf] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150206111318/https://www.vatican.va/|date=February 6, 2015}}, p. 317)</ref> From then on this penalty was incurred automatically through abortion at any stage of pregnancy.<ref name="catholicsensibility.wordpress.com">{{Cite journal |journal=Irish Theological Quarterly |first=Brian V. |last=Johnstone |date=March 2005 |title=Early Abortion: Venial or Mortal Sin? |volume=70 |issue=1 |page=60 |doi=10.1177/002114000507000104|s2cid=170797954 }} An excerpt can be found [http://catholicsensibility.wordpress.com/2008/08/27/moral-theology-and-early-abortion/ here].</ref>
There has been considerable debate among modern Biblical experts on the status of fetuses in the Hebrew Bible. Exodus 21:22 describes a situation in which two men fight and injure a pregnant woman, causing her unborn child to leave her womb. The [[Masoretic Text]] uses the Hebrew term "veyats'u yeladeha" (וְיָצְאוּ יְלָדֶיהָ)<ref>{{cite web|url=https://mechon-mamre.org/p/pt/pt0221.htm|title = Exodus 2021, Masoretic Text (1917 Jewish Publication Society Translation) published online by Mechon Mamre on 14 November 2017}}</ref> to refer to the child coming out;<ref>{{cite web|title = Makujina, John, "The Semantics of יצא in Exodus 21:22: Reassessing the Variables That Determine Meaning", ''Bulletin for Biblical Research'' Vol. 23, No. 3 (Penn State University Press, 2013), pp. 305–321| jstor=26424831 }}</ref> different English versions translate this term either as a "premature birth" or as a "miscarriage".<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.biblegateway.com/verse/en/Exodus%2021%3A22|title = Exodus 21:22, Various Translations – - Bible Gateway}}</ref> The Spanish translation published by the Sociedad Biblica Catolica Internacional (SOBICAIN) uses the term "aborto", clearly indicating the demise of the fetus.<ref>{{cite book|title=La Biblia|publisher=Sociedad Biblica Catolica Internacional (SOBICAIN)|location=Madrid|year=1995}} The passage reads: "Si unos hombres, en el curso de una pelea, dan un golpe a una mujer embarazada provocandole un aborto, sin que muera la mujer, seran multados conforme a lo que imponga el marido ante los jueces. Pero si la mujer muere, pagaran vida por vida, ojo por ojo, [...]" (translation courtesy of translate.com: "If men, in the course of a fight, hit a pregnant woman causing an abortion, without the woman dying, they will be fined according to what the husband imposes before the judges. But if the woman dies, they will pay life for life, an eye for an eye, [...]")</ref> If no additional harm follows, then the perpetrator must pay a fine. Only if there is additional harm must the perpetrator be punished with equal harm (i.e. eye for an eye).<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Exodus%2021:22-24|title = Exodus 21:22–24 – - Bible Gateway}}</ref> Commentators such as [[Bruce Waltke]] have presented this verse as evidence that God does not value a fetus as a human being, and/or evidence that a fetus has no soul.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/2012/10/30/my-take-when-evangelicals-were-pro-choice/comment-page-30/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121104022621/http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/2012/10/30/my-take-when-evangelicals-were-pro-choice/comment-page-30/|archive-date=November 4, 2012|title=My Take: When evangelicals were pro-choice}}</ref><ref>Bruce Waltke, "The Old Testament and Birth Control", ''Christianity Today'' 13 no. 3 (1968) 3–6</ref><ref>{{cite web | title=When Evangelicals were pro-choice - GOPlifer | url=http://blog.chron.com/goplifer/2014/03/when-evangelicals-were-pro-choice/ | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140331150652/http://blog.chron.com/goplifer/2014/03/when-evangelicals-were-pro-choice/ | archive-date=31 March 2014 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Judaism/abortion.html|title=Abortion in Judaism}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.etsjets.org/files/JETS-PDFs/37/37-2/JETS_37-2_169-184_Fuller.pdf|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101230215132/http://www.etsjets.org/files/JETS-PDFs/37/37-2/JETS_37-2_169-184_Fuller.pdf|archive-date=December 30, 2010|title=Fuller, Russell, Exodus 21:22–23: The Miscarriage Interpretation and the Personhood of the Fetus (June 1994) Journal of Evangelical Theological Society, pp. 169–184.}}</ref> [[C. Everett Koop]] disagreed with this interpretation.<ref>{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=4PIV2TymFC8C&pg=PA154 |page=154 |title=Godly Seed: American Evangelicals Confront Birth Control, 1873–1973 |last=Carlson |first=Allan C. |publisher=Transaction |date=December 31, 2011 |isbn=978-1-4128-4651-6}}</ref>
Another Old Testament passage that has been subject to debate on abortion is Numbers 5:11-31, which describes the test of an unfaithful wife.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://ffrf.org/component/k2/item/25602-abortion-rights,|title=What Does the Bible Really Say About Abortion? – Freedom From Religion Foundation|first=Lauryn|last=Seering|website=ffrf.org|access-date=2022-06-25|archive-date=2021-05-20|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210520134008/https://ffrf.org/component/k2/item/25602-abortion-rights,}}</ref> If a man is suspicious of his wife's fidelity, he would take her to the high priest. The priest would make a substance for the woman to drink made from water and "dust from the floor of the tabernacle". If she had been unfaithful, "her belly will swell and her thigh will rot, and she will become a curse," but if she was innocent, the drink would have no effect.<ref>{{cite wikisource |title=Bible (King James) |wslink=https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Bible_(King_James)/Numbers/Chapter_5}}</ref> Some modern English translations such as the 2011 revision of the [[New International Version]] and the [[New Revised Standard Version]] render "her thigh will rot" as "to miscarry", while other translations such as the [[English Standard Version]] and the [[New King James Version]] reject this view.<ref>{{cite web|title=The Test for an Unfaithful Wife|url=https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Numbers%205:11-31&version=NIV|access-date=December 14, 2025}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=The Test for an Unfaithful Wife|url=https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Numbers%205:11-31&version=NSRV|access-date=December 15, 2025}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=The Test for an Unfaithful Wife|url=https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Numbers%205:11-31&version=ESV|access-date=December 15, 2025}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=The Test for an Unfaithful Wife|url=https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Numbers%205:11-31&version=NKJV|access-date=December 15, 2025}}</ref> Some have challenged the translation "to miscarry" on the grounds that the Biblical passage does not state that the unfaithful wife is pregnant.<ref>{{cite thesis |last=Scannell |first=Ryan Stephen |date=2024 |title=A Christian Understanding of the Ordeal of Bitter Waters (Num 5:11–31): Did God Command the Ancient Israelites to Commit Abortion? |url=https://www.proquest.com/docview/3156242473 |degree=Master of Divinity |publisher=ProQuest |access-date=15 December 2025}}</ref>
Currently, the Roman Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, and Oriental Orthodox churches oppose abortion from conception.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/__P7Z.HTM|title = Catechism of the Catholic Church, s. 2270, citing Jeremiah 1:5, Job 10:8–12, Psalms 22:10–11, 139:15.|access-date=June 27, 2022}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://orthodoxinfo.com/praxis/abortion.aspx|title=An Orthodox View of Abortion: The Amicus Curiae Submitted to the Supreme Court in Webster et al. v. Reproductive Health Services et. al.|access-date=June 27, 2022}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://qa.suscopts.org/index.php?qid=1613&catid=711|title = Coptic Orthodox Diocese of the Southern United States - Q&A |access-date=December 15, 2025}}</ref>
==Modern era== {{Globalize|section|date=April 2017}}
===Criminalization=== [[File:JapaneseAbortionWoodblock.jpg|thumb|right|200px|"Admonition against abortion". Late 19th-century Japanese [[Ukiyo-e]] [[woodblock printing|woodblock print.]]]] 19th-century medicine saw tremendous advances in the fields of [[surgery]], [[anaesthesia]], and [[sanitation]]. Social attitudes towards abortion shifted in the context of a backlash against the [[women's rights]] movement. Abortion had previously been widely practiced and legal under [[common law]] in early pregnancy (until [[quickening]]), and it was not until the 19th century that the [[English-speaking world]] passed laws against abortion at all stages of pregnancy.<ref>{{cite book | last=Reagan | first=Leslie J. | title=When Abortion Was a Crime: Women, Medicine, and Law in the United States, 1867–1973 | url=https://archive.org/details/whenabortionwasc00reag_0 | url-access=registration |page=[https://archive.org/details/whenabortionwasc00reag_0/page/8 8]| publisher=University of California Press | year=1997| isbn=978-0-520-21657-0 }}</ref>
There were a number of factors that contributed to this shift in opinion about abortion in the early 19th century. In the United States, where [[physicians]] were the leading advocates of abortion criminalization laws, some of them argued that advances in medical knowledge showed that [[quickening]] was neither more nor less crucial in the process of [[gestation]] than any other step, and thus if one opposes abortion after quickening, one should oppose it before quickening as well.<ref name="Mohr">{{cite book|title=Abortion in America: The Origins and Evolution of National Policy|url=https://archive.org/details/abortioninameric00jame|url-access=registration|author=James C. Mohr|year=1978|pages=[https://archive.org/details/abortioninameric00jame/page/35 35–36]|publisher=Oxford University Press/|isbn=978-0-19-502249-0}}</ref>
Practical reasons also influenced the medical field to impose [[abortion law|anti-abortion laws]]. For one, abortion providers tended to be untrained and not members of medical societies. In an age where the leading doctors in the nation were attempting to standardize the medical profession, these "irregulars" were considered a nuisance to public health.<ref name="Mohr2">{{cite book|title=Abortion in America: The Origins and Evolution of National Policy|url=https://archive.org/details/abortioninameric00jame|url-access=registration|author=James C. Mohr|year=1978|page=[https://archive.org/details/abortioninameric00jame/page/34 34]|publisher=Oxford University Press/|isbn=978-0-19-502249-0}}</ref> The "irregulars" were also disliked by the more formalized medical profession because they were competition, and often cheap competition. Though the physicians' campaign against abortion began in the early 1800s, little change was made in the United States until after the [[American Civil War|Civil War]].<ref name="Mohr3">{{cite book|title=Abortion in America: The Origins and Evolution of National Policy|url=https://archive.org/details/abortioninameric00jame|url-access=registration|author=James C. Mohr|year=1978|page=[https://archive.org/details/abortioninameric00jame/page/147 147]|publisher=Oxford University Press/|isbn=978-0-19-502249-0}}</ref>
The English law on abortion was first codified in legislation under sections 1 and 2 of [[Malicious Shooting or Stabbing Act 1803]]. The [[bill (law)|Bill]] was proposed by the [[Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales]], [[Edward Law, 1st Baron Ellenborough]] to clarify the law relating to abortion and was the first law to explicitly outlaw it. The Act provided that it was an offence for any person to perform or cause an abortion. The punishment for performing or attempting to perform a post [[quickening]] abortion was the [[death penalty]] (section 1) and otherwise was transportation for fourteen years (section 2). In the 19th-century United States, there was little regulation of abortion, in the tradition of English common law, pre quickening abortions were considered at most a misdemeanor. These cases proved difficult to prosecute as the testimony of the mother was usually the only means to determine when quickening had occurred.<ref name="Doan">{{cite book|title=Opposition and Intimidation:The abortion wars and strategies of political harassment|url=https://archive.org/details/oppositionintimi00doan|url-access=limited|first=Alesha E. |last=Doan|year=2007|page=[https://archive.org/details/oppositionintimi00doan/page/n57 46]|publisher=University of Michigan|isbn=978-0-472-09975-7}}</ref>
The law was amended in [[Offences against the Person Act 1828|1828]] and [[Offences against the Person Act 1837|1837]] – the latter removed the distinction between women who were quick with child (late pregnancy) and those who were not. It also eliminated the death penalty as a possible punishment. The latter half of the 19th century saw abortion become increasingly punished. One writer justified this by claiming that the number of abortions among married women had increased markedly since 1840.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=dfICAAAAYAAJ&dq=%22therapeutic%20abortion%22&pg=PA374 Transactions of the Washington Obstetrical and Gynecological Society]</ref> The [[Offences against the Person Act 1861]] created a new preparatory offence of procuring poison or instruments with intent to procure abortion. During the 1860s however abortion services were available in New York, New Orleans, Cincinnati, Louisville, Cleveland, Chicago and Indianapolis; with estimates of one abortion for every 4 live births.{{sfn|Doan|2007|p=47}}
Anti-abortion statutes began to appear in the United States from the 1820s. A [[Connecticut]] law in 1821 targeted [[apothecary|apothecaries]] who sold poisons to women for purposes of abortion, and [[New York (state)|New York]] made post-quickening abortions a felony and pre-quickening abortions a misdemeanor in 1829.<ref>{{cite journal |first1=Suzanne M. |last1=Alford |url=http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?52+Duke+L.+J.+1011 |title=Is Self-Abortion a Fundamental Right? |volume=52 |journal=Duke Law Journal |pages=1011–29 |issue=5 |year=2003 |jstor=1373127 |pmid=12964572 |access-date=2014-07-14 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190122060327/https://law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?52+Duke+L.+J.+1011 |archive-date=2019-01-22 }}</ref> Criminalization accelerated from the late 1860s, through the efforts of concerned legislators, doctors, and the [[American Medical Association]].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://womenshistory.about.com/od/abortionuslegal/a/abortion.htm |title=Abortion History: A History of Abortion in the United States |access-date=2006-07-07 |last=Lewis |first=Jone Johnson |work=Women's History section of About.com |publisher=About.com |archive-date=2017-03-03 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170303021904/http://womenshistory.about.com/od/abortionuslegal/a/abortion.htm }}</ref> In 1873, the [[Comstock Law]] prohibited any methods of production or publication of information pertaining to the procurement of [[abortion]], the [[Birth control|prevention of conception]], and the prevention of [[venereal disease]], even to students of medicine.<ref>DeRobigne Mortimer Bennett. (1878). [https://archive.org/stream/anthonycomstockh00bennuoft#page/1017/mode/1up ''Anthony Comstock: His Career of Cruelty and Crime. A Chapter from "Champions of the Church"'']. Retrieved 26 July 2022 – via Internet Archive.</ref> By 1909, the penalty for violating these laws became a $5000 fine and up to five years imprisonment. By 1910, nearly every state had anti-abortion laws;{{sfn|Doan|2007|p=51}} these were unevenly enforced at best.<ref name="Reagan">{{cite book | last=Reagan | first=Leslie J. | title=When Abortion Was a Crime: Women, Medicine, and Law in the United States, 1867–1973 | url=https://archive.org/details/whenabortionwasc00reag_0 | url-access=registration | publisher=University of California Press | year=1997| isbn=978-0-520-21657-0 }}</ref>{{rp|80–112}}
Abortion restrictions are not new, but have increased and spread to places where they were not before.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Mucciaroni |first1=Gary |last2=Ferrailo |first2=Kathleen |last3=Rubado |first3=Meghan |year=2019 |title= Framing Morality Policy Issues: State Legislative Debates on Abortion Restrictions |journal= Policy Sciences |volume=52 |issue=2 |pages=171–189 |doi=10.1007/S11077-018-9336-2 }}</ref> Today, there has been an increase in the amount of laws that restrict abortion care in a greater amount of ways that previously seen, and there has been a trend toward abortion restrictive laws and legislature.<ref name="ReferenceA">{{Cite journal|last1=Beckman |first1=Linda J. |year=2016|title=Abortion in the United States: The Continuing Controversy |journal=Feminism & Psychology |volume=27 |issue=1 |pages=101–113 |doi=10.1177/0959353516685345 }}</ref> Negative framing around abortion has contributed to today's trend toward anti-abortion legislature. The abortion battle in the United States can be seen as largely a battle of competing ideologies.<ref name="ReferenceA"/> Anti-abortion advocates believe life begins at conception, so legalized abortion is a threat to social, moral, and religious values.<ref name="ReferenceA"/> However, pro-abortion advocates view legalized abortion as a woman's control over her body and the access to safe reproductive care.<ref name="ReferenceA"/>
In the United States today, after Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, many states have banned abortion and target providers of abortions. In these states where abortion is banned, OBGYNs have been barred from offering abortions or just do not offer the services, except in very limited and certain circumstances, and do not even provide their patients with referrals to other clinicians or online resources involving abortion.<ref name="ReferenceB">{{Cite conference|last1=Federiksen |first1=Brittni |last2=Ranji |first2=Ranji |last3=Gomez |first3=Ivette |last4=Salganicoff |first4=Alina |title=A National Survey of OBGYNs' Experiences After Dobbs |publisher=KFF |location=San Francisco, CA |year=2023 }}</ref> The reasoning for not offering the services stems from many of the institutions that employ these OBGYNs having policies against performing abortions or terminating a pregnancy, which imposes too many legal regulations involving abortion care.<ref name="ReferenceB"/> OBGYNs have stated that their practices have been impacted and that their relationships with their patients have become worse since the decision on Dobbs was made.<ref name="ReferenceB"/>
In contrast, in France social perceptions of abortion started to change. In the first half of the 19th century, abortion was viewed as the last resort for pregnant but unwed women. As writers began to write about abortion in terms of family planning for married women, the practice of abortion was reconceptualized as a logical solution to [[unwanted pregnancies]] resulting from ineffectual contraceptives.<ref name="mclaren-french">{{Cite journal|last=McLaren |first=Angus |date=Spring 1978 |title=Abortion in France: Women and the Regulation of Family Size 1800–1914 |journal=French Historical Studies |volume=10 |issue=3 |pages=461–484 [469] |quote=Increasingly, writers in the latter half of the nineteenth century no longer referred to abortion as a last resort for the single, seduced girl but as a family planning measure employed by the married woman. As a result the very nature of the idea and practice of abortion was transformed. |doi=10.2307/286340 |pmid=11614490 |publisher=Duke University Press |jstor=286340}}</ref> The formulation of abortion as a form of family planning for married women was made "thinkable" because both medical and non-medical practitioners agreed on the relative safety of the procedure.<ref name="mclaren-french"/> {{further|Illegal operation (euphemism)}}
===19th and 20th century abortion methods=== [[File:FrenchPeriodicalPills-January61845,BostonDailyTimes.jpg|thumb|right|170px|An 1845 ad for "French Periodical Pills" warns against use by women who might be "en ciente [''sic'']" ("''enceinte''" is French for "pregnant").]]
In New York, surgical abortion in 1800s carried a death rate of 30% regardless of hospital setting, and the [[American Medical Association]] launched an anti-abortion campaign that resulted in abortion becoming the exclusive domain of doctors.{{sfn|Doan|2007|p=47}} A paper published in 1870 on the abortion services to be found in [[Syracuse, New York]], concluded that the method most often practiced there during this time was to [[douche|flush]] inside of the uterus with injected water. The article's author, Ely Van de Warkle, claimed this procedure was affordable even to a [[maid]], as a man in town offered it for $10 on an [[installment plan]].<ref>{{Cite book|first=Ely |last=Van de Warker |year=1870 |title=The detection of criminal abortion and a study of fœticidal drugs |url=https://archive.org/details/detectionofcrimi00vanduoft |publisher=James Campbell |location=Boston |access-date=2008-12-14}}</ref> Other prices which 19th-century abortion providers are reported to have charged were much more steep. In Britain, it could cost from 10 to 50 [[Guinea (British coin)|guinea]]s, or 5% of the [[Per capita income|yearly income]] of a [[lower middle class]] household.<ref name="potts" />
From 1870 there was a steady decline in fertility in England, linked by some commentators not to a rise in the use of artificial contraception but to more traditional methods such as withdrawal and [[abstinence]]. This was linked to changes in the perception of the relative costs of [[childrearing]]. Of course, women did find themselves with unwanted pregnancies. [[Abortifacient]]s were discreetly advertised and there was a considerable body of folklore about methods of inducing miscarriages. Amongst working-class women violent [[purgative]]s were popular, [[Mentha pulegium|pennyroyal]], [[aloe]]s and [[turpentine]] were all used. Other methods to induce miscarriage were very hot baths and [[gin]], extreme exertion, a controlled fall down a flight of stairs, or veterinary medicines. So-called 'backstreet' abortionists were fairly common, although their bloody efforts could be fatal. Estimates of the number of illegal abortions performed in England varied widely: by one estimate, 100,000 women made efforts to procure a miscarriage in 1914, usually by drugs.{{Citation needed|date=July 2015}}
A rash of unexplained miscarriages in [[Sheffield]], England were attributed to [[lead poisoning]] caused by the metal [[water pipe|pipe]]s which fed the city's water supply. Soon, women began using [[diachylon]], a substance with a high concentration of lead, as an abortifacient. In 1898, a woman confessed to having used diachylon to induce a miscarriage.<ref name=potts/> The use of diachylon became prevalent in the [[The Midlands|English Midlands]] up until [[World War I]]. Criminal investigation of an abortionist in [[Calgary, Alberta]] in 1894 revealed through [[chemical analysis]] that the concoction he had supplied to a man seeking an abortifacient contained [[Lytta vesicatoria|Spanish fly]].<ref name=ccha>{{Cite journal |last=Beahen |first=William |year=1986 |title=Abortion and Infanticide in Western Canada 1874 to 1916: A Criminal Case Study |journal=Historical Studies |volume=53 |pages=53–70 |publisher=The Canadian Catholic Historical Association |url=http://www.umanitoba.ca/colleges/st_pauls/ccha/Back%20Issues/CCHA1986/Beahan.htm |access-date=2008-12-10 |archive-date=2009-02-02 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090202122325/http://www.umanitoba.ca/colleges/st_pauls/ccha/Back%20Issues/CCHA1986/Beahan.htm |url-status=dead }}</ref>
Dr. Evelyn Fisher wrote of how women living in a [[mining]] town in Wales during the 1920s used candles intended for [[Roman Catholic]] ceremonies to dilate the [[cervix]] in an effort to [[self-induced abortion|self-induce]] abortion.<ref name=potts/> Similarly, the use of candles and other objects, such as glass rods, penholders, [[hair iron|curling iron]]s, spoons, sticks, knives, and [[catheter]]s was reported during the 19th century in the United States.<ref name="king">{{Cite journal|author=King CR |title=Abortion in nineteenth century America: a conflict between women and their physicians |journal=Women's Health Issues |volume=2 |issue=1 |pages=32–9 |year=1992 |pmid=1628000 |doi=10.1016/S1049-3867(05)80135-5 |url=http://www.popline.org/docs/076577 |access-date=2008-12-10 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090202135921/http://www.popline.org/docs/076577 |archive-date=February 2, 2009 |url-access=subscription }}</ref> Women of [[Judaism|Jewish descent]] in [[Lower East Side, Manhattan]] are said to have carried the ancient Indian practice of sitting over a pot of steam into the early 20th century.<ref name=yale/> Some commentators maintained that abortion remained a dangerous procedure into the early 20th century, more dangerous than childbirth until about 1930.<ref>Abortion was more dangerous than childbirth throughout the 19th century. By 1930, medical procedures had improved for both childbirth and abortion but not equally, and induced abortion in the first trimester had become safer than childbirth. In 1973, ''Roe vs. Wade'' acknowledged that abortion in the first trimester was safer than childbirth.<br />{{•}}{{cite book |title=Time communication 1940–1989: retrospective |publisher=Time Inc. |year=1989 |chapter=The 1970s |quote=Blackmun was also swayed by the fact that most abortion prohibitions were enacted in the 19th century when the procedure was more dangerous than now.}}<br />{{•}}{{cite book |last=Will |first=George |title=Suddenly: the American idea abroad and at home, 1986–1990 |publisher=Free Press |year=1990 |page=[https://archive.org/details/suddenlyamericangwill00will/page/312 312] |isbn=0-02-934435-2 |url=https://archive.org/details/suddenlyamericangwill00will/page/312 }}<br />{{•}}{{cite web |url=http://www.policyalmanac.org/culture/archive/crs_abortion_overview.shtml |title=Abortion Law Development: A Brief Overview |last1=Lewis |first1=J. |last2=Shimabukuro |first2=Jon O. |publisher=Congressional Research Service |date=January 28, 2001 |access-date=May 1, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110514133610/http://www.policyalmanac.org/culture/archive/crs_abortion_overview.shtml |archive-date=May 14, 2011 }}<br />{{•}}{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=EHj_0R2rbxAC&pg=PA1 |page=1 |title=Encyclopedia of American law |last=Schultz |first=David Andrew |publisher=Infobase Publishing |year=2002 |isbn=0-8160-4329-9 }}<br />{{•}}{{cite journal |title=Pregnancy termination |journal=Population Reports |author=Population Information Program, George Washington University |author2=Dept. of Medical and Public Affairs, Johns Hopkins University |publisher=Population Information Program, The Johns Hopkins University |year=1980 |number=7}}<br />{{•}}{{cite web |title=Birthing a Nation: Fertility Control Access and the 19th Century Demographic Transition |last=Lahey |first=Joanna N. |publisher=Pomona College |date=September 24, 2009 |url=http://economics.pomona.edu/colloquium/ |work=Colloquium |access-date=August 4, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110815111454/http://economics.pomona.edu/colloquium/ |archive-date=August 15, 2011 }}</ref> But others have said that in the 19th century early abortions under the hygienic conditions in which midwives usually worked were relatively safe.<ref name=GordonMoral>{{cite book | last = Gordon | first = Linda | title = The Moral Property of Women | publisher = University of Illinois Press | year = 2002 | isbn = 0-252-02764-7 }}</ref>{{rp|25|}}<ref>{{citation | last = Solinger | first = Rickie | contribution = Introduction | editor-last = Solinger | editor-first = Rickie | title = Abortion Wars: A Half Century of Struggle, 1950-2000 | pages = [https://archive.org/details/abortionwarshalf0000soli/page/1 1–9] | publisher = University of California Press | year = 1998 | isbn = 978-0-520-20952-7 | url = https://archive.org/details/abortionwarshalf0000soli/page/1 }}</ref>{{rp|4}}<ref name="Charles C. Thomas">{{cite book | last1 = Bates | first1 = Jerome E. | last2 = Zawadzki | first2 = Edward S. | title = Criminal Abortion: A Study in Medical Sociology | publisher = Charles C. Thomas | year = 1964 | isbn = 978-0-398-00109-4 }}</ref>{{rp|59}} <ref name="Taussig 1936">{{cite book | last = Taussig | first = Frederick J. | title = Abortion Spontaneous and Induced: Medical and Social Aspects | publisher = C. V. Mosby | year = 1936 }}</ref>{{rp|223}}<ref name="Lee 1838 351–353">{{citation | last=Lee | first=Charles A. | title=Report of a trial for murder | journal=American Journal of the Medical Sciences |year=1838|volume=XXII|pages=351–353}}</ref><ref name="Bailey 1896 144–150">{{citation | last=Bailey | first=Benjamin | title=Induction of abortion and premature labor | journal=North American Journal of Homeopathy | year=1896|volume=XI|issue=3|pages=144–150}}</ref><ref>{{citation | last=Simpson | first=Keith | title=Forensic Medicine | publisher=Edward Arnold Publishers | year=1947 | pages=173–174}}</ref> In addition, some authors have written that, despite improved medical procedures, the period from the 1930s until legalization also saw more zealous enforcement of anti-abortion laws, and concomitantly an increasing control of abortion providers by organized crime.<ref name="Reagan"/><ref>{{cite book | last=Evans | first=Max | title=Madam Millie: Bordellos from Silver City to Ketchikan | publisher=University of New Mexico Press | year=2002 | pages=209–218, 230, 267–286, 305}}</ref><ref>{{cite book | last=Donner | first=James | title=Women in Trouble: The Truth about Abortion in America | publisher=Monarch Books | year=1959}}</ref><ref>{{cite book | last=Oakley | first=Ann | title=The Captured Womb | publisher=Basil Blackwell | year=1984 | page=91}}</ref><ref>{{cite book | last=Solinger | first=Rickie | title=The Abortionist: A Woman Against the Law | publisher=The Free Press | year=1994 | pages=xi, 5, 16–17, 157–175}}</ref>
===Advertising for abortifacients and abortion services=== [[File:Beecham's pills advert.jpg|thumb|right|Suggestive advertisement for the use of [[Beecham's Pills]] as an abortifacient. The text at the bottom notes that the pills "assist nature in her wondrous functions".]] Despite bans enacted on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean, access to abortion continued, as the disguised advertisement of abortion services, abortion-inducing devices, and abortifacient medicines in the [[Victorian era]] would seem to suggest.<ref name=history2>{{cite web|url=http://users.telerama.com/~jdehullu/abortion/abhist.htm |title=Histories of Abortion |first=James |last=DeHullu |access-date=2008-12-11| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20081118194538/http://users.telerama.com/~jdehullu/abortion/abhist.htm| archive-date=November 18, 2008}}</ref> Apparent print ads of this nature were found in the United States,<ref name=libraryofcongress>{{cite web|url=http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/awhhtml/awser2/advertisement.html |title=Product Advertisements |work=American Women |year=2001 |publisher=[[Library of Congress]] |access-date=2008-12-11}}</ref> the United Kingdom,<ref name=potts/> and Canada.<ref name="mclaren-canada">{{Cite journal|last=McLaren |first=Angus |title=Birth control and abortion in Canada, 1870–1920 |journal=Canadian Historical Review |volume=59 |issue=3 |pages=319–40 |year=1978 |pmid=11614314 |doi=10.3138/CHR-059-03-02 |s2cid=26629671 }}</ref> A ''[[British Medical Journal]]'' writer who replied to [[newspaper]] ads peddling relief to women who were "temporarily indisposed" in 1868 found that over half of them were in fact promoting abortion.<ref name=potts/>
A few examples of surreptitiously marketed abortifacients include "Farrer's Catholic Pills", "Hardy's Woman's Friend", "Dr. Peter's French Renovating Pills", "[[Lydia Pinkham]]'s Vegetable Compound",<ref name=victorianpills>{{Cite news|first=Barbara |last=Black |title=Women win back reproductive rights |url=http://www.nsnews.com/issues00/w112700/opinion/editorial/black.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20040819235658/http://www.nsnews.com/issues00/w112700/opinion/editorial/black.html |archive-date=2004-08-19 |work=North Shore News |publisher=Lower Mainland Publishing Group |location=[[North Vancouver (district municipality)|North Vancouver, British Columbia]] |date=2000-11-27 |access-date=2008-12-11}}</ref> and "Madame Drunette's Lunar Pills".<ref name=potts/> [[Patent medicine]]s which claimed to treat "female complaints" often contained such ingredients as [[Mentha pulegium|pennyroyal]], [[tansy]], and [[Juniper|savin]]. Abortifacient products were sold under the promise of "restor[ing] female regularity" and "removing from the system every impurity".<ref name=victorianpills/> In the vernacular of such advertising, "irregularity", "obstruction", "menstrual suppression", and "delayed period" were understood to be [[euphemism|euphemistic]] references to the state of pregnancy. As such, some abortifacients were marketed as [[menstruation|menstrual regulative]]s.<ref name=king/>
[[Beecham's Pills]] were marketed primarily as a [[laxative]] from 1842. They were invented by [[Thomas Beecham (chemist)|Thomas Beecham]] from [[St Helens, Lancashire]], England. The pills were a combination of [[aloe]], [[ginger]], and [[soap]], with some other more minor ingredients. The popularity of the pills produced a wide range of testimonials that were used in advertising. The poet [[William Topaz McGonagall]] wrote a poem advertising the pills, giving his recommendation in verse.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.mcgonagall-online.org.uk/poems/opgbeechams.htm |title=McGonagall Online – Beecham's Pills |access-date=2014-07-14 |archive-date=2011-09-27 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110927015503/http://www.mcgonagall-online.org.uk/poems/opgbeechams.htm |url-status=dead }}</ref> Beecham's expenditure on advertising went from £22,000 to £95,000 in the 1880s.<ref>{{cite book|author1=T. C. Barker |author2=R Harris |title=A Merseyside Town in the Industrial Revolution 1750–1900|publisher=Liverpool University Press|year=1954|pages=378–9}}</ref> An 1897 advertisement in the ''Christian Herald'' edition for [[Queen Victoria]]'s [[Diamond Jubilee of Queen Victoria|Diamond Jubilee]] said: "Worth a guinea a box. Beecham's Pills for all bilious and nervous disorders such as Sick Headache, Constipation, Weak Stomach, Impaired Digestion, Disordered Liver and Female Ailments. The sale is now 6 million boxes per annum." The text was printed alongside a picture of a young woman at a beach and was captioned "What are the wild waves saying? Try Beecham's Pills."<ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=-EOmAAAACAAJ|title=Interception of Pregnancy: Post-Conceptive Fertility Control, Emmenology Revisited|author=Geoffrey Davis|year=1974|publisher=HarperCollins Publishers Australia|isbn=978-0-207-95563-1}}</ref>
[[File:National Police Gazette Restell.jpg|thumb|left|170px|"The Female Abortionist". [[Madame Restell]] is portrayed as a [[villain]]ess in an 1847 copy of the ''National Police Gazette''.]] "Old Dr. Gordon's Pearls of Health", produced by a [[Pharmaceutical company|drug company]] in [[Montreal]], "cure[d] all suppressions and irregularities" if "used monthly".<ref name=bedroom>{{Cite book |first=Angus |last=MacLaren |author2=Arlene Tigar MacLaren |title=The bedroom and the state: the changing practices and politics of contraception and abortion in Canada, 1880–1980 |publisher=McClelland & Stewart |location=Toronto |year=1986 |isbn=0-7710-5532-3 |oclc=256809754 |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/bedroomstatechan0000mcla_v4w5 }}{{Page needed|date=September 2010}}</ref> However, a few ads explicitly warned against the use of their product by women who were expecting, or listed [[miscarriage]] as its inevitable side effect. The copy for "Dr. Peter's French Renovating Pills" advised, "... pregnant females should not use them, as they invariably produce a miscarriage ...", and both "Dr. Monroe's French Periodical Pills" and "Dr. Melveau's Portuguese Female Pills" were "sure to produce a miscarriage".<ref name=potts/> F.E. Karn, a man from Toronto, in 1901 cautioned women who thought themselves pregnant not to use the [[pill (pharmacy)|pill]]s he advertised as "Friar's French Female Regulator" because they would "speedily restore menstrual secretions."<ref name=bedroom/> Historian [[Ann Hibner Koblitz]] comments that "Nineteenth-century customers would have understood this 'warning' exactly as the sellers intended: as an advertisement for an abortifacient preparation."<ref name="ahk">{{cite book|last=Koblitz|first=Ann Hibner|title=Sex and Herbs and Birth Control: Women and Fertility Regulation Through the Ages|publisher=Kovalevskaia Fund|year=2014}}</ref>{{rp|44}}
In the mid 1930s abortifacients drugs were marketed in the United States to women by various companies under various names such as Molex Pills and Cote Pills. Since birth control devices and abortifacients were illegal to market and sell at the time, they were offered to women who were "delayed". The recommended dosage constituted seven grains of ergotin a day. These pills generally contained ingredients such as ergotin, aloes, Black Hellebore. The efficacy and safety of these pills are unknown. In 1940 the FTC<ref>{{cite journal |author=Federal Trade Commission |title=In the matter of Western Refining company, Inc., trading as the Motex company and Cote products company |journal=Federal Trade Commission Decisions |url=https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/commission_decision_volumes/volume-30/vol30.pdf |volume=30 |pages=833–838 |date=December 1939 – May 1940}}</ref> deemed them unsafe and ineffective and demanded that these companies cease and desist selling these products.
A well-known example of a Victorian-era abortionist was [[Madame Restell]], or Ann Lohman, who over a forty-year period illicitly provided both surgical abortion and abortifacient pills in the northern United States. She began her business in New York during the 1830s, and, by the 1840s, had expanded to include [[franchising|franchises]] in [[Boston]] and [[Philadelphia]]. It is estimated that by 1870 her annual expenditure on advertising alone was $60,000.<ref name="potts"/> Because of her reputation, ''Restellism'' became a synonym for abortion.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Dannenfelser|first1=Marjorie|title=The Suffragettes Would Not Agree With Feminists Today on Abortion|url=https://time.com/4093214/suffragettes-abortion/|access-date=4 November 2015|magazine=TIME|date=4 November 2015|archive-date=6 November 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151106015742/http://time.com/4093214/suffragettes-abortion/|url-status=dead}}</ref>
[[File:1858AbortionAdReprint.jpg|thumb|160px|right|"Dr. Miller's Female Monthly Powders" ad copy reprinted in an 1858 article condemning such advertising]] One ad for Restell's medical services, printed in the ''[[New York Sun]]'', promised that she could offer the "strictest confidence on complaints incidental to the female frame" and that her "experience and knowledge in the treatment of cases of female irregularity, [was] such as to require but a few days to effect a perfect cure".<ref name=restell1>{{Cite book|last=Olasky |first=Marvin N. |author-link=Marvin Olasky |chapter=Crusading on Social and Political Issues: Personalization and {{sic|Pe|sistence|nolink=y}} |chapter-url=http://www.worldmag.com/world/olasky/Prodigal/c11.html |title=Prodigal press: the anti-Christian bias of the American news media |publisher=Crossway Books |location=[[Wheaton, Illinois]] |year=1988 |isbn=0-89107-476-7 |oclc=17865217 |url=https://archive.org/details/prodigalpressant00olas |access-date=2008-12-11 }}</ref> Another, addressed to [[marriage|married]] women, asked the question, "Is it desirable, then, for parents to increase their families, regardless of consequences to themselves, or the well-being of their offspring, when a simple, easy, healthy, and certain remedy is within our control?"<ref name=restell2>{{Cite journal|last=Richardson |first=Cynthia Watkins |year=2002 |title=In the Eye of Power: The Notorious Madam Restell |journal=Khronikos |publisher=[[University of Maine]] |url=http://www.umaine.edu/khronikos/docs/papers/archive/richardson.pdf |access-date=2008-12-11 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081217025152/http://www.umaine.edu/khronikos/docs/papers/archive/richardson.pdf |archive-date=2008-12-17 }}</ref> Advertisements for the "Female Monthly Regulating Pills" she also sold vowed to resolve "all cases of suppression, irregularity, or stoppage of the menses, however obdurate".<ref name=restell1/> Madame Restell was an object of criticism in both the respectable and [[penny press]]es. She was first arrested in 1841, but, it was her final arrest by [[Anthony Comstock]] which led to her [[suicide]] on the day of her trial April 1, 1878.<ref name=restell2/>
Such advertising aroused criticisms of [[quackery]] and [[morality|immorality]]. The safety of many nostrums was suspect and the [[efficacy]] of others non-existent.<ref name=king/> [[Horace Greeley]], in a ''[[New York Herald]]'' editorial written in 1871, denounced abortion and its promotion as the "infamous and unfortunately common crime– so common that it affords a lucrative support to a regular guild of professional murderers, so safe that its perpetrators advertise their calling in the newspapers".<ref name=libraryofcongress/> Although the paper in which Greeley wrote accepted such advertisements, others, such as the ''[[New York Tribune]]'', refused to print them.<ref name=libraryofcongress/> [[Elizabeth Blackwell (doctor)|Elizabeth Blackwell]], the first woman to obtain a [[Doctor of Medicine]] in the United States, also lamented how such ads led to the contemporary synonymity of "female physician" with "abortionist".<ref name=libraryofcongress/>
===Turning point in abortion legislation=== [[File:Stella Browne.gif|thumb|right|The feminist [[Stella Browne]] was a major figure in the campaign for the liberalization of abortion law.]] Abortifacient advertising was highly effective in the [[United States]], though apparently less so across the [[Atlantic Ocean|Atlantic]]. Contemporary estimates of mid-19th century abortion rates in the United States suggest between 20% and 25% of all pregnancies in the United States during that era ended in abortion.<ref name="Mohr4">{{cite book|title=Abortion in America: The Origins and Evolution of National Policy|url=https://archive.org/details/abortioninameric00jame|url-access=registration|author=James C. Mohr|year=1978|pages=[https://archive.org/details/abortioninameric00jame/page/76 76–82]|publisher=Oxford University Press/|isbn=978-0-19-502249-0}}</ref> This era also saw a marked shift in those who were obtaining abortions. Before the start of the 19th century, most abortions were sought by unmarried women who had become pregnant [[out of wedlock]]. But, out of 54 abortion cases published in American medical journals between 1839 and 1880, over half were sought by married women, and of the married women well over 60 percent already had at least one child.<ref name="Mohr5">{{cite book|title=Abortion in America: The Origins and Evolution of National Policy|url=https://archive.org/details/abortioninameric00jame|url-access=registration|author=James C. Mohr|year=1978|pages=[https://archive.org/details/abortioninameric00jame/page/100 100–101]|publisher=Oxford University Press/|isbn=978-0-19-502249-0}}</ref> In the [[Reconstruction Era|post-Civil War era]], much of the blame was placed on the burgeoning [[women's rights movement]].{{citation needed|date=May 2017}}
Many feminists of the era were opposed to abortion.<ref>Gordon, Sarah Barringer. [https://books.google.com/books?id=Kg4PAtekGoAC&pg=PA67 "Law and Everyday Death: Infanticide and the Backlash against Woman's Rights after the Civil War"]. ''Lives of the Law''. Austin Sarat, Lawrence Douglas, and Martha Umphrey, Editors. (University of Michigan Press 2006) p.67</ref><ref name="Schiff">[[Stacy Schiff|Schiff, Stacy.]] [https://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/13/opinion/13schiff.html?_r=2&oref=slogin&pagewanted=print "Desperately Seeking Susan"]. October 13, 2006 ''The New York Times'', Retrieved February 5, 2009.</ref> In [[The Revolution (newspaper)|''The Revolution'']], operated by [[Elizabeth Cady Stanton]] and [[Susan B. Anthony]], an anonymous contributor signing "A" wrote in 1869 about the subject, arguing that instead of merely attempting to pass a law against abortion, the root cause must also be addressed. Simply passing an anti-abortion law would, the writer stated, "be only mowing off the top of the noxious weed, while the root remains. [...] No matter what the motive, love of ease, or a desire to save from suffering the unborn innocent, the woman is awfully guilty who commits the deed. It will burden her conscience in life, it will burden her soul in death; But oh! thrice guilty is he who drove her to the desperation which impelled her to the crime."<ref name="Schiff" /><ref name=prolifequakers>{{cite web | title=Marriage and Maternity | url=http://www.prolifequakers.org/susanb.htm | work=[[The Revolution (newspaper)|The Revolution]] | publisher=[[Susan B. Anthony]] | date=July 8, 1869 | access-date=2009-04-21 | archive-date=2019-03-19 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190319124548/http://www.prolifequakers.org/susanb.htm }}</ref><ref>Susan B. Anthony, [http://honors.syr.edu/Courses/03-04/wsp200/july81869.html "Marriage and Maternity"], {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111005033006/http://honors.syr.edu/Courses/03-04/wsp200/july81869.html |date=2011-10-05 }} ''[[The Revolution (newspaper)|The Revolution]]'' (1869-07-08), via University Honors Program, Syracuse University.</ref><ref>Federer, William. ''[https://books.google.com/books?id=8GebI40OvYAC&dq=%22woman+is+awfully+guilty+who+commits+the+deed%22&pg=PA81 American Minute]'', page 81 (Amerisearch 2003).</ref> To many feminists of this era, abortion was regarded as an undesirable necessity forced upon women by thoughtless men.<ref name="Mohr6">{{cite book|title=Abortion in America: The Origins and Evolution of National Policy|url=https://archive.org/details/abortioninameric00jame|url-access=registration|author=James C. Mohr|year=1978|page=[https://archive.org/details/abortioninameric00jame/page/110 110]|publisher=Oxford University Press/|isbn=978-0-19-502249-0}}</ref> Even the "free love" wing of the feminist movement refused to advocate abortion and treated the practice as an example of the hideous extremes to which modern marriage was driving women.<ref name="Mohr8">{{cite book|title=Abortion in America: The Origins and Evolution of National Policy|url=https://archive.org/details/abortioninameric00jame|url-access=registration|author=James C. Mohr|year=1978|page=[https://archive.org/details/abortioninameric00jame/page/112 112]|publisher=Oxford University Press/|isbn=978-0-19-502249-0}}</ref> [[Marital rape]] and the seduction of unmarried women were societal ills which feminists believed caused the need to abort, as men did not respect women's right to abstinence.<ref name="Mohr8"/>
Socialist feminists tended to be more sympathetic to the need for abortion options for the poor, and indeed socialist feminist doctors, such as [[Marie Equi]], Madeleine Pelletier, and William J. Robinson, themselves performed low-cost or free abortions for poor women.<ref>{{cite book|last=Allen|first=Ann Taylor|title=Feminism and Motherhood in Western Europe, 1890–1970|publisher=Palgrave Macmillan|year=2005|pages=98, 173, 218}}</ref><ref>{{citation|last=Krieger|first=Nancy|title=Queen of the Bolsheviks: The Hidden History of Dr. Marie Equi|journal=Radical America|volume=17|issue=5|year=1983|pages=54–73|pmid=11618009}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last=Robinson|first=William J.|title=Doctor Robinson and Saint Peter: How Dr. Robinson Entered the Heavenly Gates and Became St. Peter's Assistant|publisher=Eugenics Publishing|year=1931|page=25}}</ref>
===Abortion law reform campaign=== The movement to liberalize abortion laws emerged in the 1920s and '30s as part of rising feminist activism that had already resulted in victories in the area of [[birth control]]. Campaigners including [[Marie Stopes]] in England and [[Margaret Sanger]] in the US had succeeded in bringing the issue into the open, and birth control clinics were established which offered family planning advice and contraceptive methods to women in need.
In 1929, the [[Infant Life (Preservation) Act 1929|Infant Life Preservation Act]] was passed in Britain, which amended the law ([[Offences against the Person Act 1861]]) so that an abortion carried out in good faith, for the sole purpose of preserving the life of the mother, would not be an offence.<ref>[[Hansard|HL Deb]]. Vol 72. [https://web.archive.org/web/20220216120020/https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/lords/1928/nov/22/preservation-of-infant-life-bill-hl Col 269].</ref>
[[Stella Browne]] was a leading birth control campaigner, who increasingly began to venture into the more contentious issue of abortion in the 1930s. Browne's beliefs were heavily influenced by the work of [[Havelock Ellis]], [[Edward Carpenter]] and other [[sexologists]].<ref name="Hall">{{cite book|last=Hall|first=Lesley|title=The Life and Times of Stella Browne: Feminist and Free Spirit|year=2011|pages=27–178}}</ref> She came to strongly believe that working women should have the choice to become pregnant and to terminate their pregnancy while they worked in the horrible circumstances surrounding a pregnant woman who was still required to do hard labour during her pregnancy.<ref>Jones, Greta. "Women and eugenics in Britain: The case of Mary Scharlieb, Elizabeth Sloan Chesser, and Stella Browne." ''[[Annals of Science]]'' 52 no. 5 (1995):481–502</ref> In this case she argued that doctors should give free information about birth control to women who wanted to know about it. This would give women agency over their own circumstances and allow them to decide whether they wanted to be mothers or not.<ref>{{cite book|last=Rowbotham|first=Sheila|title=A New World for Women: Stella Browne, social feminist|year=1977|pages=66–67}}</ref>
In the late 1920s Browne began a speaking tour around England, providing information about her beliefs on the need for accessibility of information about birth control for women, women's health problems, problems related to puberty and sex education and high maternal morbidity rates among other topics.<ref name="Hall"/> These talks urged women to take matters of their sexuality and their health into their own hands. She became increasingly interested in her view of the woman's right to terminate their pregnancies, and in 1929 she brought forward her lecture "The Right to Abortion" in front of the [[World Sexual Reform Congress]] in London.<ref name="Hall"/> In 1931 Browne began to develop her argument for women's right to decide to have an [[abortion]].<ref name="Hall"/> She again began touring, giving lectures on abortion and the negative consequences that followed if women were unable to terminate pregnancies of their own choosing such as: suicide, injury, permanent invalidism, madness and blood-poisoning.<ref name="Hall"/>
[[File:Aleck bourne trial.jpg|thumb|left|[[Aleck Bourne]] was acquitted for performing an abortion on a rape victim in 1938, a landmark case in the movement for abortion rights.]] Another prominent feminist to influence abortion law was [[Emily Stowe]]. In the 19th century she was one of the first doctors to be tried for attempting an abortion procedure in Canada.<ref>{{Cite journal|journal=Canadian Bulletin of Medical History|doi=10.3138/cbmh.8.2.159|title=The Celebrated Abortion Trial of Dr. Emily Stowe, Toronto, 1879|year=1991|last1=Backhouse|first1=Constance B.|volume=8|issue=2|pages=159–187|pmid=11612611|doi-access=free}}</ref>
Other prominent feminists, including [[Frida Laski]], [[Dora Russell]], [[Joan Malleson]] and [[Janet Chance]] began to champion this cause – the cause broke dramatically into the mainstream in July 1932 when the [[British Medical Association]] council formed a committee to discuss making changes to the laws on abortion.<ref name="Hall" /> On 17 February 1936, [[Janet Chance]], Alice Jenkins and [[Joan Malleson]] established the [[Abortion Law Reform Association]] as the first [[advocacy]] organisation for abortion liberalization. The association promoted access to [[abortion in the United Kingdom]] and campaigned for the elimination of legal obstacles.<ref name="HindellSimms">{{cite journal|last=Hindell|first=Keith|author2=Madeline Simms|title=How the Abortion Lobby Worked|year=1968|journal=[[The Political Quarterly]]|pages=271–272}}</ref> In its first year ALRA recruited 35 members, and by 1939 had almost 400 members.<ref name="HindellSimms" />
The ALRA was very active between 1936 and 1939 sending speakers around the country to talk about Labour and Equal Citizenship and attempted, though most often unsuccessfully, to have letters and articles published in newspapers. They became the most popular when a member of the ALRA's Medico-Legal Committee received the case of a fourteen-year-old girl who had been raped, and received a termination of this pregnancy from Dr. [[Joan Malleson]], a progenitor of the ALRA.<ref name="HindellSimms"/> This case gained a lot of publicity. However, once the war began, the case was tucked away and the cause again lost its importance to the public.
In 1938, [[Joan Malleson]] precipitated one of the most influential cases in British abortion law when she referred a pregnant fourteen-year-old [[rape]] victim to [[gynaecology|gynaecologist]] [[Aleck Bourne]]. He performed an abortion, then illegal, and was put on trial on charges of procuring abortion. Bourne was eventually acquitted in ''[[Rex v Bourne]]'' as his actions were "an example of disinterested conduct in consonance with the highest traditions of the profession".<ref>R v Bourne [1939] 1 KB 687, [1938] 3 All ER 615, [[Court of Criminal Appeal (England and Wales)|CCA]]</ref> This court case set a precedent that doctors could not be prosecuted for performing an abortion in cases where pregnancy would probably cause "mental and physical wreck".
Finally, the [[Norman Birkett, 1st Baron Birkett|Birkett Committee]], established in 1937 by the British government "to inquire into the prevalence of abortion, and the law relating thereto", recommended a change to abortion laws two years later. The intervention of [[World War II]] meant that all plans were shelved.<ref>{{cite book|last=Hyde|first=H. Montgomery|title=Norman Birkett: The Life of Lord Birkett of Ulverston|publisher=[[Hamish Hamilton]]|year=1965|asin=B000O8CESO|oclc=255057963|page=462}}</ref>
Another prominent figure in the reform of abortion laws was [[Henry Morgentaler|Dr. Morgentaler]]. Although born in Poland he made a name for himself in Canada, opening multiple illegal abortion clinics in Toronto, Ontario.<ref>{{cite web|title=Henry Morgentaler {{!}} The Canadian Encyclopedia|url=https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/henry-morgentaler|access-date=2021-03-05|website=www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca}}</ref>
===Liberalization of abortion law=== {{See also|Timeline of reproductive rights legislation|Abortion law|History of Abortion Law Debate}}
====Canada====
Prior to 1969, abortion was considered a crime for which the maximum punishment was life imprisonment for the doctor performing the abortion and two years imprisonment for the woman receiving the abortion. Abortion remained illegal until 1988, when the Supreme Court of Canada overruled the criminal punishments for abortion.<ref>{{cite web|title=Abortion in Canada {{!}} The Canadian Encyclopedia|url=https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/abortion|access-date=2021-02-26|website=www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca}}</ref> Abortion remains a hotly debated topic. As of 2008 in Canada only 1–2% of abortions were pharmaceutically induced.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Erdman |first1=Joanna N. |last2=Grenon |first2=Amy |last3=Harrison-Wilson |first3=Leigh |date=October 2008 |title=Medication Abortion in Canada: A Right-to-Health Perspective |journal=American Journal of Public Health |language=en |volume=98 |issue=10 |pages=1764–1769 |doi=10.2105/AJPH.2008.134684 |issn=0090-0036 |pmc=2636450 |pmid=18703434}}</ref> After much controversy, starting in 2017 abortion pills could be used legally in Canada.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Campbell |first=Patricia |date=2018-05-04 |title=Making sense of the abortion pill: a sociotechnical analysis of RU486 in Canada |url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14461242.2018.1426996 |journal=Health Sociology Review |language=en |volume=27 |issue=2 |pages=121–135 |doi=10.1080/14461242.2018.1426996 |issn=1446-1242 |s2cid=149328597|url-access=subscription }}</ref>
[[File:RussianAbortionPoster.jpg|thumb|210px|right|The [[Soviet Union]] first legalized abortion in 1920. The [[Propaganda|poster]] {{circa|lk=no|1925}} warns against [[unsafe abortion]]. Title translation: "Abortions performed by either self-taught midwives or obstetricians not only maim the woman, they also often lead to death."]]
====Russia==== The [[Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic]] was the first government to legalize abortion and make it available on request, often for no cost.<ref>Heer, David, "Abortion, Contraception, and Population Policy in the Soviet Union" Demography 2 (1965): 531–39.</ref><ref>Alexandre Avdeev, Alain Blum, and Irina Troitskaya. "The History of Abortion Statistics in Russia and the USSR from 1900 to 1991". ''Population'' (English Edition) 7, (1995), 42.</ref> The Soviet government hoped to provide access to abortion in a safe environment performed by a trained doctor instead of ''babki''.<ref name="Kon2">I.S. Kon, ''The Sexual Revolution in Russia: From the Age of the Czars to Today'' (New York: The Free Press, 1995), 61.</ref> While this campaign was extremely effective in the urban areas (as much as 75% of abortions in Moscow were performed in hospitals by 1925), it had much less effect on rural regions where there was neither access to doctors, transportation, or both and where women relied on traditional medicine.<ref>Michaels, Paula, "Motherhood, Patriotism, and Ethnicity: Soviet Kazakhstan and the 1936 Abortion Ban". ''Feminist Studies'' 27 (2001): 309–11.</ref> In the countryside in particular, women continued to see ''babki'', midwives, hairdressers, nurses, and others for the procedure after abortion was legalized in the Soviet Union.<ref>Barbara Evans Clements, Barbara Alpern Engel, and [[Christine Worobec]]. ''Russia's Women: Accommodation, Resistance, Transformation'' (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1991), 260.</ref>
From 1936 until 1955 the Soviet Union made abortion illegal (except for medically recommended cases) again, stemming largely from [[Joseph Stalin]]'s worries about population growth. Stalin wanted to encourage population growth, as well as place a stronger emphasis on the importance of the family unit to [[communism]].<ref>Randall, Amy, {{"'}}Abortion Will Deprive You of Happiness!': Soviet Reproductive Politics in the Post-Stalin Era". ''Journal of Women's History'' 23 (2011): 13–38.</ref>
====Spain==== During the [[Spanish Civil War]], on 25 December 1936, in [[Catalonia]], free abortion was legalized during the first 12 weeks of pregnancy with a decree signed by [[Josep Tarradellas]], [[List of Vice Presidents of Catalonia|First Minister of the Government of Catalonia]], and published on 9 January 1937 (''Diari Oficial de la Generalitat de Catalunya, núm.9'').<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20140222062133/http://www.publico.es/especiales/memoriapublica/502228/la-segunda-republica-despenalizo-el-aborto-con-la-ley-mas-avanzada-de-europa La Segunda República despenalizó el aborto con la ley más avanzada de Europa], [[Público (España)]], [[Patricia Campello]], 15/2/2014</ref><ref>[http://elpais.com/diario/1983/02/13/espana/413938815_850215.html Cataluña tuvo durante la República la ley del aborto más progresista de Europa], El País, 13/2/1983</ref><ref>Véase el texto del decreto [https://www.cgtburgos.org/accion-sindical-social/social/nosotras-decidimos/699-1937-la-ley-del-aborto-mas-progresista-de-europa.html Decreto de Regulación de la Interrupción Artificial del Embarazo] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190328191808/https://www.cgtburgos.org/accion-sindical-social/social/nosotras-decidimos/699-1937-la-ley-del-aborto-mas-progresista-de-europa.html|date=2019-03-28}}, en cgtburgos; también el reportaje de [[José María Garat]], publicó en [[Mundo Gráfico]] el 12 de mayo de 1937, descargable desde la [[Biblioteca Nacional de España]] -[http://hemerotecadigital.bne.es/pdf.raw?query=parent%3A0002440164+type%3Apress%2Fpage&name=Mundo+gr%C3%A1fico.+12-5-1937 En Cataluña existe ya el aborto legal]</ref>
====Great Britain==== In Britain, the [[Abortion Law Reform Association]] continued its campaigning after the War, and this, combined with broad social changes brought the issue of abortion back into the political arena in the 1960s. President of the [[Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists]] [[John Peel (gynaecologist)|John Peel]] chaired the committee advising the [[British Government]] on what became the [[1967 Abortion Act]]. On the grounds of reducing the amount of disease and death associated with illegal abortion, the Abortion Act allowed for legal abortion on a number of grounds, including to prevent grave permanent injury to the woman's physical or [[mental health]], to avoid injury to the physical or mental health of the woman or her existing child(ren) if the pregnancy was still under 28 weeks, or if the child was likely to be severely physically or mentally handicapped. The free provision of abortions was provided through the [[National Health Service]].<ref name="Commons 1967">House of Commons, Science and Technology Committee. "Scientific Developments Relating to the Abortion Act 1967". 1 (2006–2007). Print.</ref>
====United States==== {{See also|History of abortion in the United States}}
In America an abortion reform movement emerged in the 1960s. In 1963, the [[Pat Maginnis#The Society for Human Abortion|Society for Humane Abortion]] was formed, providing women with information on how to obtain and perform abortions.<ref>{{cite book|author1=Alesha Doan|title=Opposition and Intimidation: The Abortion Wars and Strategies of Political Harassment|url=https://archive.org/details/oppositionintimi00doan|url-access=limited|date=2007|publisher=University of Michigan Press|isbn=978-0-472-06975-0|page=[https://archive.org/details/oppositionintimi00doan/page/n69 58]}}</ref> In 1964 [[Gerri Santoro]] of Connecticut died trying to obtain an illegal abortion and her photo became the symbol of the abortion rights movement. Some women's rights activist groups developed their own skills to provide abortions to women who could not obtain them elsewhere. As an example, in Chicago, a group known as "[[Jane Collective|Jane]]" operated a floating abortion clinic throughout much of the 1960s. Women seeking the procedure would call a designated number and be given instructions on how to find "Jane".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.cwluherstory.org/something-real-jane-and-me-memories-and-exhortations-of-a-feminist-ex-abortionist.html|title=Something Real: Jane and Me. Memories and Exhortations of a Feminist Ex-Abortionist|last=Johnson|first=Linnea|publisher=CWLU Herstory Project|access-date=2010-05-23|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110725214230/http://www.cwluherstory.org/something-real-jane-and-me-memories-and-exhortations-of-a-feminist-ex-abortionist.html|archive-date=2011-07-25}}</ref>
In the late 1960s, a number of organizations were formed to mobilize opinion both against and for the legalization of abortion. The forerunner of the [[NARAL Pro-Choice America]] was formed in 1969 to oppose restrictions on abortion and expand access to abortion.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.nwhn.org/content/index.php?pid=106 |title=National Women's Health Network {{!}} A Voice For Women, A Network For Change |access-date=2014-07-14 |archive-date=2006-10-28 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061028193312/http://www.nwhn.org/content/index.php?pid=106 }}</ref> In late 1973 NARAL became the National Abortion Rights Action League. The American Medical Association, the American Bar Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the California Medical Association, the California Bar Association, and numerous other groups announced support behind new laws that would protect doctors from criminal prosecution if they performed abortions under rigid hospital controls. In 1967, [[Colorado]] became the first state to decriminalize a doctor performing an abortion in cases of rape, incest, or in which pregnancy would lead to permanent physical disability of the woman.
A bipartisan majority in the California legislature supported a new law introduced by Democratic state senator [[Anthony Beilenson]], the "Therapeutic Abortion Act". Catholic clergy were strongly opposed but Catholic lay people were divided and non-Catholics strongly supported the proposal. [[Governorship of Ronald Reagan#Abortion issue|Governor Ronald Reagan]] consulted with his father-in-law, a prominent surgeon who supported the law. He also consulted with [[James Francis McIntyre|James Cardinal McIntyre]], the Catholic archbishop of Los Angeles. The archbishop strongly opposed any legalization of abortion and he convinced Reagan to announce he would veto the proposed law since the draft allowed abortions in the case of birth defects. The legislature dropped that provision and Reagan signed the law, which decriminalized abortions when done to protect the health of the mother.<ref>Kristen Luker, ''Abortion and the politics of motherhood'' (U. of California Press, 1984) pp 88–89.</ref><ref>Lou Cannon, ''Ronald Reagan: The Presidential Portfolio: History as Told through the Collection of the Ronald Reagan Library and Museum'' (2001) p. 51.</ref><ref>Matthew W. Dallek, ''The right moment: Ronald Reagan's first victory and the decisive turning point in American politics'' (2000) p. 198.</ref> The expectation was that abortions would not become more numerous but would become much safer under hospital conditions. In 1968 the first full year under the new law there were 5,018 abortions in California. The numbers grew exponentially and stabilized at about 100,000 annually by the 1970s. 99.2% of California women who applied for an abortion were granted one. One out of every three pregnancies was ended by illegal abortion. The key factor was the sudden emergence of a woman's movement that introduced a very new idea—women had a basic right to control their bodies and could choose to have an abortion or not. Reagan by 1980 found his support among anti-abortion religious groups and said he was too new as governor to make a wise decision.<ref>Luker, ''Abortion and the politics of motherhood'' pp. 94, 118–122, 133.</ref>
In 1970, Hawaii became the first state to legalize abortions on the request of the woman,<ref>{{cite news| title=Medicine: Abortion on Request | date=March 9, 1970 | magazine=[[Time (magazine)|Time]] | url=http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,878789,00.html | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101201211449/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,878789,00.html | archive-date=December 1, 2010 | access-date=2012-10-15}} {{subscription required}}</ref> and New York repealed its 1830 law and allowed abortions up to the 24th week of pregnancy. Similar laws were soon passed in Alaska and Washington. A law in Washington, D.C., which allowed abortion to protect the life or health of the woman, was challenged in the Supreme Court in 1971 in ''[[United States v. Vuitch]]''. The court upheld the law, deeming that "health" meant "psychological and physical well-being", essentially allowing abortion in Washington, DC. By the end of 1972, 13 states had a law similar to that of Colorado, while Mississippi allowed abortion in cases of rape or incest only and Alabama and Massachusetts allowed abortions only in cases where the woman's physical health was endangered. [[Image:Burger Court in 1973.jpg|thumb|left|350px|The [[United States Supreme Court]] membership in 1973 at the time of ''[[Roe v. Wade]]'']]
The landmark judicial ruling of the [[Supreme Court of the United States|Supreme Court]] in ''[[Roe v. Wade]]'' ruled that a Texas statute forbidding abortion except when necessary to save the life of the mother was unconstitutional. The immediate result was that all state laws to the contrary were null. The Court arrived at its decision by concluding that the issue of abortion and abortion rights falls under the [[Privacy laws of the United States|right to privacy]]. The Court held that a right to privacy existed and included the right to have an abortion. The court found that a mother had a right to abortion until viability, a point to be determined by the abortion doctor. After viability a woman can obtain an abortion for health reasons, which the Court defined broadly to include psychological well-being.
From the 1970s, and the spread of [[second-wave feminism]], abortion and [[reproductive rights]] became unifying issues among various women's rights groups in Canada, the United States, the Netherlands, Britain, Norway, France, Germany, and Italy.<ref>LeGates, Marlene. ''In Their Time: A History of Feminism in Western Society'' Routledge, 2001 {{ISBN|0-415-93098-7}} p. 363-364</ref>
On June 24, 2022, ''Roe v. Wade'' was overturned by the Supreme Court in a 6–3 decision. The ruling was part of ''[[Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization]]'', a decision of the Supreme Court that also overturned ''[[Planned Parenthood v. Casey]]'', another case of the Supreme Court regarding abortion.<ref name="NYTimesRoe">{{cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/24/us/roe-wade-overturned-supreme-court.html |title=In 6-to-3 Ruling, Supreme Court Ends Nearly 50 Years of Abortion Rights |date=June 24, 2022 |last=Liptak |first=Adam |work=[[The New York Times]] |access-date=June 25, 2022}}</ref>
===Development of contemporary abortion methods=== <!-- [[WP:NFCC]] violation: [[File:Harvey Karman.jpg|thumb|right|[[Harvey Karman]] showing his invention, the [[Karman cannula]] for [[suction-aspiration abortion]].]] --> Although prototypes of the modern [[curette]] are referred to in ancient texts, the instrument which is used today was initially designed in France in 1723, but was not applied specifically to a gynecological purpose until 1842.<ref name=nafhistory>{{Cite book |first=C |last=Joffe |chapter=Abortion in Historical Perspective |chapter-url=http://www.prochoice.org/education/resources/surg_history_overview.html |access-date=2008-12-10 |editor=Maureen Paul |editor2=E. Steven Lichtenberg |editor3=Lynn Borgatta |editor4=David A. Grimes |editor5=Phillip G. Stubblefield |title=A clinician's guide to medical and surgical abortion |publisher=[[Churchill Livingstone]] |location=[[Philadelphia]] |year=1999 |isbn=0-443-07529-8 |oclc=40120288 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060922152349/http://www.prochoice.org/education/resources/surg_history_overview.html |archive-date=2006-09-22 }}</ref> [[Dilation and curettage]] has been practiced since the late 19th century.<ref name=nafhistory/>
The 20th century saw improvements in abortion technology, increasing its safety, and reducing its [[Adverse effect (medicine)|side-effect]]s. [[Vacuum]] devices, first described by the Scottish obstetrician [[James Young Simpson]] in the 19th century, allowed for the development of [[suction-aspiration abortion]].<ref name="nafhistory"/> The process was improved by the Russian doctor S. G. Bykov in 1927, where the method was used during its period of liberal abortion laws from 1920 to 1936. The technology was also used in China and Japan before being introduced to [[UK|Britain]] and the United States in the 1960s.<ref name="nafhistory"/> The invention of the [[Karman cannula]], a flexible [[plastic]] [[cannula]] which replaced earlier metal models in the 1970s, reduced the occurrence of perforation and made suction-aspiration methods possible under [[local anesthesia]].<ref name=nafhistory/>
In 1971, [[Lorraine Rothman]] and [[Carol Downer]], founding members of the feminist self-help movement, invented the Del-Em, a safe, cheap suction device that made it possible for people with minimal training to perform early abortions called [[menstrual extraction]].<ref name=nafhistory/>
Swedish researchers began testing potential [[abortifacient]]s in 1965. In 1968, the Swedish physician [[Lars Engström]] published a paper on a clinical trial, conducted at the women's clinic of [[Karolinska Hospital]] in Stockholm, of the compound F6103 on pregnant Swedish women with the aim of inducing abortion. It was the first clinical trial of an abortion pill to be conducted in Sweden.<ref>{{Cite book | vauthors = Ramsey M |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=J_9CzgEACAAJ |title=The Swedish Abortion Pill: Co-Producing Medical Abortion and Values, Ca. 1965-1992 |date=2021 |publisher=Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis |isbn=978-91-513-1121-0 }}</ref> The paper, originally titled ''The Swedish Abortion Pill'', was renamed to ''The Swedish Postconception Pill'', due to the small number of induced abortions that occurred in the trial population. After these efforts were largely unsuccessful with F6103, the same researchers attempted to find an abortion pill with [[prostaglandin]]s, capitalizing on the number of well-established prostaglandin scientists working in Sweden at the time; they were eventually awarded the [[List of Nobel laureates in Physiology or Medicine|1982 Nobel Prize in Physiology]] for their work.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Raju TN | title = The Nobel chronicles. 1982: Sune Karl Bergström (b 1916); Bengt Ingemar Samuelsson (b 1934); John Robert Vane (b 1927) | journal = Lancet | volume = 354 | issue = 9193 | page = 1914 | date = November 1999 | pmid = 10584758 | doi = 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)76884-7 | s2cid = 54236400 }}</ref>
Abortions brought about by taking medications, known as [[medication abortion]]s, became an alternative to surgical aboritons when [[prostaglandin analogue|prostaglandin analog]]s were introduced in the 1970s. One such analog is [[carboprost]], which was successfully trialed in the United States in 1979.<ref name="Mayo">"Carboprost" - Drug fact sheet, Mayo Clinic. Last updated: July 01, 2024 https://www.mayoclinic.org/drugs-supplements/carboprost-intramuscular-route/proper-use/drg-20067975</ref><ref name="Vuk">{{Cite journal |pmid=11436877 |date=2001 |last1=Vukelić |first1=J. |title=Second trimester pregnancy termination in primigravidas by double application of dinoprostone gel and intramuscular administration of carboprost tromethamine |journal=Medicinski Pregled |volume=54 |issue=1–2 |pages=11–16 }}</ref><ref name="Byg">{{cite journal | doi=10.1016/S0968-8080(08)31385-8 | title=An Historical Overview of Second Trimester Abortion Methods | date=2008 | last1=Bygdeman | first1=Marc | last2=Gemzell-Danielsson | first2=Kristina | journal=Reproductive Health Matters | volume=16 | issue=31 Suppl | pages=196–204 | pmid=18772101 }}</ref><ref name="Sch">{{Cite journal |pmid=392084 |date=1979 |last1=Schwallie |first1=P. C. |last2=Lamborn |first2=K. R. |title=Induction of abortion by intramuscular administration of (15S)-15-methyl PGF2 alpha. An overview of 815 cases |journal=The Journal of Reproductive Medicine |volume=23 |issue=6 |pages=289–293 }}</ref><ref name="Bha">{{Cite journal |pmid=527343 |date=1979 |last1=Bhaskar |first1=A. |last2=Dimov |first2=V. |last3=Baliga |first3=S. |last4=Kinra |first4=G. |last5=Hingorani |first5=V. |last6=Laumas |first6=K. R. |title=Plasma levels of 15 (S) 15-methyl-PGF 2 alpha-methyl ester following vaginal administration for induction of abortion in women |journal=Contraception |volume=20 |issue=5 |pages=519–531 |doi=10.1016/0010-7824(79)90057-x }}</ref>
In 1981, French pharmaceutical company [[Roussel-Uclaf]] developed the antiprogestogen [[mifepristone]] (also known as RU-486), which successfully induces abortions. It is typically taken in combination with [[misoprostol]].<ref name="RU-486">{{cite journal|vauthors=Rowan A|date=2015|title=Prosecuting Women for Self-Inducing Abortion: Counterproductive and Lacking Compassion|url=http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/gpr/18/3/gpr1807015.html|journal=Guttmacher Policy Review|volume=18|issue=3|pages=70–76|access-date=October 12, 2015|archive-date=March 4, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304114230/http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/gpr/18/3/gpr1807015.html|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref name="Kapp 2009">{{cite book|title=Management of unintended and abnormal pregnancy: comprehensive abortion care|url=https://archive.org/details/managementuninte00paul|url-access=limited| vauthors = Kapp N, von Hertzen H |publisher=Wiley-Blackwell|year=2009|isbn=978-1-4051-7696-5| veditors = Paul M, Lichtenberg ES, Borgatta L, Grimes DA, Stubblefield PG, Creinin MD |location=Oxford|pages=[https://archive.org/details/managementuninte00paul/page/n197 178]–192 |chapter=Medical methods to induce abortion in the second trimester}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Zhang J, Zhou K, Shan D, Luo X | title = Medical methods for first trimester abortion | journal = The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews | volume = 2022 | issue = 5 | article-number = CD002855 | date = May 2022 | pmid = 35608608 | pmc = 9128719 | doi = 10.1002/14651858.CD002855.pub5 }}</ref>
[[Intact dilation and extraction]] was developed by Dr. James McMahon in 1983. It resembles a procedure used in the 19th century to save a woman's life in cases of obstructed labor, in which the fetal skull was first punctured with a perforator, then crushed and extracted with a [[forceps]]-like instrument, known as a [[cranioclast]].<ref>{{Cite magazine|first=Atul |last=Gawande |author-link=Atul Gawande |date=2006-10-09 |title=The Score: How Childbirth Went Industrial |magazine=[[The New Yorker]] |url=http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2006/10/09/061009fa_fact |access-date=2008-12-14}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.fcgapultoscollection.com/dobfor.html |title=Destructive OB Forceps |first=F. C. |last=Gapultos |work=Accoucheur's Antique |access-date=2008-12-14}}</ref>
Medication abortions became common when mifepristone was approved for use in China and France in 1988. Later it was approved in Great Britain in 1991, in Sweden in 1992, in Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Israel, Lichtenstein, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Russia, Spain, and Switzerland in 1999, in Norway, Taiwan, Tunisia, and the United States in 2000, and in 70 additional countries from 2001 to 2023.<ref>{{cite web |author=Gynuity Health Projects |date=March 14, 2023 |title=Map of Mifepristone Approvals |location=New York |publisher=Gynuity Health Projects |url=https://gynuity.org/assets/resources/mapmifelist_en.pdf |access-date=April 16, 2023 |archive-date=May 29, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230529053718/https://gynuity.org/assets/resources/mapmifelist_en.pdf }} Map and list of mifepristone approvals by year in 93 countries from 1988 to 2023.</ref>
During the mid-1990s in the United States the medical community showed renewed interest in [[manual vacuum aspiration]] as a method of early surgical abortion. This resurgence is due to technological advances that permit early pregnancy detection (as soon as a week after conception) and a growing popular demand for safe, effective early abortion options, both surgical and medical. An innovator in the development of early surgical abortion services is Jerry Edwards, a physician, who developed a protocol in which women are offered an abortion using a handheld vacuum syringe as soon as a positive pregnancy test is received. This protocol also allows the early detection of an ectopic pregnancy.<ref name=nafhistory/>
As of 2022, medication abortions are more common than surgical abortions in most places around the world.<ref name="Kapp 2009" /><ref name=Guttmacher_2022-02 >{{ cite web | url=https://www.guttmacher.org/article/2022/02/medication-abortion-now-accounts-more-half-all-us-abortions |title=Medication Abortion Now Accounts for More Than Half of All US Abortions | vauthors = Jones RK | publisher=[[Guttmacher Institute]] | date=December 1, 2022 |access-date=April 16, 2023}}</ref>
==Abortion around the world== At various times abortion has been banned or restricted in countries around the world. Multiple scholars have noticed that in many cases, this has caused women to seek dangerous, illegal abortions underground or inspired trips abroad for "reproductive tourism".<ref name="Whittaker">Whittaker, Andrew. "Abortion in Asia: An Overview". In Whittaker, Andrea, ed. ''Abortion in Asia: Local Dilemmas, Global Politics'' New York, NY: Berghahn Books, 2010: 11–38.</ref><ref name="Kligman long">Kligman, Gail. ''The Politics of Duplicity: Controlling Reproduction in Ceausescu's Romania''. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1998.</ref><ref name="Chandrasekhar">Chandrasekhar, S. ''India's Abortion Experience'' Denton, TX: University of North Texas Press, 1994.</ref> Half of the world's current deaths due to unsafe abortions occur in Asia.<ref name="Whittaker"/>
Other authors have written that illegality has not always meant that abortions were unsafe. In the U.S. during the 19th century, early abortions under the hygienic conditions in which midwives usually worked were relatively safe.<ref name=GordonMoral/>{{rp|25|}}{{rp|4}}<ref name="Charles C. Thomas"/>{{rp|59}}<ref name="Taussig 1936"/>{{rp|223}}<ref name="Lee 1838 351–353"/><ref name="Bailey 1896 144–150"/><ref>{{citation | last=Simpson | first=Keith | title=Forensic Medicine | publisher=Edward Arnold Publishers | year=1969 | pages=173–174}}</ref>
===China=== {{See also|Abortion in China}} In the early 1950s, the Chinese government made abortion illegal, with punishments for those who received or performed illegal abortions written into the law.<ref name="Jing-Bao">Jing-Bao, Nie. ''Behind the Silence: Chinese Voices on Abortion'' Lanham, ML: Rowman & Litterfield Publishers, 2005.</ref> These restrictions were seen as the government's way of emphasizing the importance of population growth.<ref name="Jing-Bao"/>
As the decade went on, the laws were relaxed with the intent of reducing the number of deaths and lifelong injuries women sustained due to illegal abortions, as well as serving as a form of population control when used in conjunction with birth control.<ref name="Jing-Bao"/> In the early 1980s, the state implemented a form of family planning which used abortion as a "back-up method"; and in 2005, there has been legislation trying to curb sex-selective abortion.<ref name="Jing-Bao"/> As of 2009, although China had the highest number of abortions in the world, Russia had the highest rate in the world.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/jul/30/china-abortion-statistics|title = 13 million abortions carried out every year in China, newspaper reveals|website = [[TheGuardian.com]]|date = 30 July 2009}}</ref>
===India=== {{See also|Abortion in India}} India enforced the [[Indian Penal Code]] from 1860 to 1971, criminalizing abortion and punishing both the practitioners and the women who sought out the procedure.<ref name="Chandrasekhar"/> As a result, women died in an attempt to obtain illegal abortions from unqualified midwives and "doctors".<ref name="Chandrasekhar"/> Abortion was made legal under specific circumstances in 1971, but as scholar S. Chandrasekhar notes, lower class women still find themselves at a greater risk of injury or death as a result of a botched abortion.<ref name="Chandrasekhar"/>
=== Iran === In 2023, the state reported 500,000 abortions performed in the year against 1.5 million births.<ref>{{Cite web |title=با چه امیدی بچه به دنیا بیاوریم؟ {{!}} مردم از تشویقهای مهم قانون جوانی جمعیت بیخبرند {{!}} آمار سقط جنین به تولدها تنه میزند – همشهری آنلاین |url=https://www.hamshahrionline.ir/news/762038/با-چه-امیدی-بچه-به-دنیا-بیاوریم-مردم-از-تشویق-های-مهم-قانون/ |access-date=2023-05-25 |website=www.hamshahrionline.ir |date=22 May 2023 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=یک مسئول: سالانه ۵۰۰ هزار جنین در کشور سقط میشوند/ ۹۳ درصد آن در بستر خانواده و با رضایت اتفاق میافتد |url=https://vista.ir/n/aataneo |access-date=2023-05-25 |website=ویستا |language=fa-IR}}</ref>
===Japan=== {{See also|Abortion in Japan}}
Japan is known today worldwide for its acceptance of abortion.<ref name="Whittaker"/><ref name="Norgren">Norgren, Tiana. ''Abortion before Birth Control: The Politics of Reproduction in Postwar Japan'' Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001.</ref> Since induced abortion was legalized in 1948, The numbers of annual abortions increased to 1.17 million in 1955, making the induced abortion rate per 1000 women aged 15–49 50.2. The number dropped in 2005 to total number 289,000, making the abortion rate per 1000 women 10.2. Social factor and medical advance including contractive are giving effect to the number.<ref name=ipss>{{cite web| url=https://www.ipss.go.jp/publication/e/WP/IPSS_WPE22.pdf |title= Induced Abortion in Japan--A Demographic Analysis of its Trends |website= National institute of population and social security research |access-date=2025-01-10}}</ref>
The Eugenics Protection Law of 1948 made elective abortion care legal up to twenty-two weeks' gestation so long as the woman's health was endangered; in 1949, this law was extended to consider the risk the child's birth would place on a woman's economic welfare.<ref name="Whittaker"/><ref name="Norgren"/> Originally, each case would have to be approved by a local eugenics council, but this was removed from the law in 1952, making the decision a private one between a woman and her physician and woman's partner.<ref name="Whittaker"/><ref name="Norgren"/><ref name=mat>{{Cite web|url= https://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/ja/laws/view/2603 |title= Maternal Health Act |website= Japanese Law Translation |access-date=2025-01-10}}</ref> 。In 1996, the law was partly revised, and the name was changed to Maternal Health Act. The law still requires partner's agreement for abortion, in some cases leaving women who need abortion without.<ref name=yomi>{{Cite news|url=https://www.yomiuri.co.jp/national/20210920-OYT1T50257/|title= 「男性の同意」ないと中絶できない…相手からの連絡途絶えた未婚女性、公園のトイレで出産し遺棄 |website= Yomiuri Shimbun |access-date=2025-01-10}}</ref>。
In 1964, the creation of the conservative right-wing nationalist political lobbying group called [[Seicho-no-Ie]] brought about a strong opposition to the abortion laws.<ref name="Whittaker"/> This campaign reached its peak strength in the early 1980s, but ultimately failed in 1983.<ref name="Whittaker"/>
===Romania=== {{See also|Abortion in Romania}} In 1957, Romania legalized abortion, but in 1966, after a decline in the national birthrate, [[Nicolae Ceauşescu]] approved Decree 770, which criminalized abortion and encouraged childbirth. As a result of this decree, women in want of abortion turned to illegal procedures that caused the deaths of over 9,000 women and left unwanted children abandoned in orphanages. Abortion remained illegal until 1989, when the decree was overturned.<ref name="Kligman short">Kligman, Gail. "Political Demography: The Banning of Abortion in Ceausescu's Romania". In Ginsburg, Faye D.; Rapp, Rayna, eds. ''Conceiving the New World Order: The Global Politics of Reproduction.'' Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1995 :234–255. Unique Identifier : AIDSLINE KIE/49442.</ref>
===Thailand=== There was intense public debate throughout the 1980s and 1990s over legal abortion reform.<ref name="Whittaker"/> These debates portrayed abortion as un-Buddhist and anti-religious; abortion opponents ultimately labeled it as a form of Western corruption that was inherently anti-Thai and threatened the integrity of the nation.<ref name="Whittaker"/> Despite this, in 2006, abortions became legal in cases of [[rape]] or [[foetal impairment]].<ref name="Whittaker"/> Mental health also became a factor in determining the legality of an abortion procedure.<ref name="Whittaker"/> The strict regulations involved in qualifying for a legal abortion, however, cause approximately 300,000 women a year to seek illegal avenues according to scholar Andrea Whittaker, with the poorest undergoing the most dangerous of procedures.<ref name="Whittaker"/>
==See also== * [[Susan B. Anthony abortion dispute]] * [[George Lotrell Timanus]] * [[Aleck Bourne]] * [[Henry Katz]] *[[Emily Stowe]] *[[Henry Morgentaler]]
==Notes== {{notelist}}
==References== {{Reflist|30em}}
==Further reading== * {{Cite book|first=Donald T. |last=Critchlow |author-link=Donald T. Critchlow |title=Intended consequences: birth control, abortion, and the federal government in modern America |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |location=[[Oxford]] |year=1999 |isbn=0-19-504657-9 |oclc=38542669 |url=https://archive.org/details/intendedconseque00crit_0 }} * {{Cite book|first=Donald T. |last=Critchlow |author-link=Donald T. Critchlow |title=The politics of abortion and birth control in historical perspective |publisher=[[Penn State University Press]] |location=[[University Park, Pennsylvania]] |year=1996 |isbn=0-271-01570-5 |oclc=33132898}} * {{Cite book|first=David J. |last=Garrow |author-link=David Garrow |title=Liberty and sexuality: the right to privacy and the making of Roe v. Wade |publisher=[[Macmillan Publishers]] |location=[[New York City]] |year=1994 |isbn=0-02-542755-5 |oclc=246873646 |url=https://archive.org/details/libertysexuality00garr }} * {{cite book|last=Hartmann|first=Betsy|title=Reproductive Rights and Wrongs: The Global Politics of Population Control|publisher=South End Press|year=1995|isbn=978-0-89608-491-9}} * {{Cite book|first=N. E. H. |last=Hull |author2=Peter Charles Hoffer |author2-link=Peter Charles Hoffer |title=Roe v. Wade: the abortion rights controversy in American history |publisher=[[University Press of Kansas]] |location=[[Lawrence, Kansas]] |year=2001 |isbn=0-7006-1142-8 |oclc=231958828 |url=https://archive.org/details/isbn_9780700611430 }} * Lewis, Margaret Brannan. ''Infanticide and abortion in early modern Germany'' (Routledge, 2016). * {{Cite book|first=James C. |last=Mohr |title=Abortion in America: the origins and evolution of national policy, 1800–1900 |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |location=[[Oxford]] |year=1978 |isbn=0-19-502249-1 |oclc=3016879 |url=https://archive.org/details/abortioninameric00jame }} * {{Cite book|first=Marvin |last=Olasky |author-link=Marvin Olasky |title=Abortion Rites: A Social History of Abortion in America |publisher=[[Crossway Books]] |location=[[Wheaton, Illinois]] |year=1992 |isbn=0-89107-687-5}} * {{Cite book|first=Suzanne |last=Staggenborg |title=The pro-choice movement: organization and activism in the abortion conflict |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |location=[[Oxford]] |year=1991 |isbn=0-19-506596-4 |oclc=22809649 |url=https://archive.org/details/prochoicemovemen0000stag }} * {{Cite book|first=Eva R. |last=Rubin |title=The Abortion controversy: a documentary history |publisher=[[Greenwood Publishing Group]] |location=[[Westport, Connecticut]] |year=1994 |isbn=0-313-28476-8 |oclc=28213877 |url=https://archive.org/details/abortioncontrove00rubi }} * {{cite book|last1=Wiesner-Hanks|first1=Merry E.|title=Christianity and Sexuality in the Early Modern World Regulating Desire, Reforming Practice.|date=1999|publisher=Routledge|location=Hoboken|isbn=978-0-203-97941-9}} * {{Cite conference|last1=Federiksen |first1=Brittni |last2=Ranji |first2=Usha |last3=Gomez |first3=Ivette |last4=Salganicoff |first4=Alina |title=A National Survey of OBGYNs' Experiences After Dobbs |publisher=KFF |location=San Francisco, CA |year=2023 }} * {{Cite journal|last1=Mucciaroni |first1=Gary |last2=Ferrailo |first2=Kathleen |last3=Rubado |first3=Meghan |year=2019 |title= Framing Morality Policy Issues: State Legislative Debates on Abortion Restrictions |journal= Policy Sciences |volume=52 |issue=2 |pages=171–189 |doi=10.1007/S11077-018-9336-2 }} * {{Cite journal|last1=Beckman |first1=Linda J. |year=2016|title=Abortion in the United States: The Continuing Controversy |journal=Feminism & Psychology |volume=27 |issue=1 |pages=101–113 |doi=10.1177/0959353516685345 }}
==External links== {{Commons category}} * [http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=410&invol=113 Text of the Roe v Wade decision from Findlaw]
{{Abortion}} {{World topic|History of abortion in|title=History of abortion by country|noredlinks=yes}}
<!--
In the West, the matter was dealt with in [[Ecclesiastical courts]], which treated abortion of an "unformed fetus" (prior to [[quickening]]) as ''quasi-homicide'', imposing a lesser penance than for full homicide. Starting with ''Leges Henrici Primi'', around 1115, abortion was treated as a misdeamenor prior to "[[quickening]]", accruing a penalty of 3 years' penance, or as a "quasi homicide", with ten years' penance, after quickening.{{cn}} With the notable exception of [[Henry Bracton]],<ref>{{Cite book|author=Henry de Bracton|author-link=Henry de Bracton|chapter=The crime of homicide and the divisions into which it falls |editor=George E. Woodbine |translator=Samuel Edmund Thorne |title=On the Laws and Customs of England |orig-date={{circa|lk=no|1250}} |year=1968 |volume=2 |page=[http://hlsl5.law.harvard.edu/bracton/Unframed/English/v2/341.htm 341] |oclc=1872}}</ref> most writers on the subject held to this view, and the penalties for homicide were not applied to the crime of abortion. [[William Staunford]] first formulated the [[born alive rule]] in accordance with the definition of [[Murder in English law]], which states that the victim be "a reasonable creature ''in rerum natura''", language which dates back to the [[Leges Henrici Primi]]. [[William Blackstone]]'s commentaries are usually consulted for the modern formulation of this rule.
[This probably needs a citation so we know where to put it.]
The seeds of Queen Anne's Lace (''Daucus carota''), also known as wild carrot, have been in use as a post-coital agent for centuries.{{cn|date=28 Oct 2012}}
-->
{{DEFAULTSORT:History Of Abortion}} [[Category:History of abortion| ]] [[Category:Human reproduction]] [[Category:History of women's rights|Abortion]]