Feihyla
TaxonFeihyla
AuthorityFrost et al., 2006[1]
Type speciesPhilautus palpebalis
Type species authoritySmith, 1924
Subdivision6, see text

Feihyla is a genus of frogs in the family Rhacophoridae, subfamily Rhacophorinae. They are found in southern China and Vietnam, and likely also in Laos. Its phylogenetic position is not yet fully resolved, but it is probably the sister taxon to Taruga, Polypedates, and Rhacophorus.[2] Feihyla was originally erected to resolve polyphyly of Chirixalus by absorbing "Chirixalus palpebralis".[1]

Description

The synapomorphy diagnosing Feihyla is its reproductive mode, laying eggs in a jelly containing some bubbles.[3]

Species

The following species are recognized in the genus Feihyla:[2]

References

  1. ^ Frost, D. R.; Grant, T.; Faivovich, J. N.; Bain, R. H.; Haas, A.; Haddad, C. L. F. B.; De Sá, R. O.; Channing, A.; Wilkinson, M.; Donnellan, S. C.; Raxworthy, C. J.; Campbell, J. A.; Blotto, B. L.; Moler, P.; Drewes, R. C.; Nussbaum, R. A.; Lynch, J. D.; Green, D. M.; Wheeler, W. C. (2006). "The Amphibian Tree of Life". Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History. 297: 1–291. doi:10.1206/0003-0090(2006)297[0001:TATOL2.0.CO;2]. hdl:2246/5781
  2. ^ Frost, Darrel R. (2013). "Feihyla Frost, Grant, Faivovich, Bain, Haas, Haddad, de Sá, Channing, Wilkinson, Donnellan, Raxworthy, Campbell, Blotto, Moler, Drewes, Nussbaum, Lynch, Green, and Wheeler, 2006". Amphibian Species of the World 5.6, an Online Reference. American Museum of Natural History. Retrieved 17 November 2013.
  3. ^ Li, Jiatang; Dingqi Rao; Robert W. Murphy; Yaping Zhang (2011). "The systematic status of rhacophorid frogs". Asian Herpetological Research. 2: 1–11. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1245.2011.00001. Archived from the original on 2013-12-03. Retrieved 2013-11-17.
  4. ^ Liu, S.; Bu, C.; Feng, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Yang, S.; Ma, Z.; Chen, Z.; Chen, S.; He, K.; Zhong, W.; Rao, D. (2026). "Two New Species of the Genus Feihyla (Anura: Rhacophoridae) previously confused with F. fuhua Fei, Ye & Jiang, 2010 from Yunnan, China". Ecologica Montenegrina. 94: 228-242. doi:10.37828/em.2026.94.16