Court of Requests

The Court of Requests was a minor equity court in England and Wales. It was instituted by King Richard III in his 1484 parliament. It first became a formal tribunal with some Privy Council elements under Henry VII, hearing cases from the poor and from servants of the King. It quickly became popular for its low cost of bringing a case and rapid processing time, earning the disapproval of the common law judges. Two formal judges, the "Masters of Requests Ordinary", were appointed towards the end of Henry VIII's reign, with an additional two "Masters of Requests Extraordinary" appointed under Elizabeth I to allow two judges to accompany her on her travels around England (Latin: Regiae Majestati a Supplicum Libellis Magister).^[1] Two more ordinary masters were appointed under James I of England, with the increasing volume of cases bringing a wave of complaints as the court's business and backlog grew.

The court became embroiled in a dispute with the common law courts during the late 16th century, who were angry at the amount of business deserting them for the Court of Requests. During the 1590s they went on the offensive, overwriting many decisions made by the Requests and preventing them from imprisoning anyone. It is commonly accepted that this was a death-blow for the court, which, dependent on the Privy Seal for authority, died when the English Civil War made the seal invalid.

History

The precise origins of the Court of Requests are unknown. Spence traces it back to the reign of Richard II,^[2] Leadam, rejecting Spence's case, claims there is no official record of the court's existence before 1493,^[3] Pollard writes (based on documents discovered after Leadam's work) that it was in existence from at least 1465,^[4] while Alexander writes that it first appeared during the reign of the House of York,^[5] and Kleineke states that it was created in 1485 by Richard III.^[6] Whatever its origin, the court was created as part of the Privy Council, following an order by the Lord Privy Seal that complaints and cases brought to the council by the poor should be expedited.^[7] This was as part of the Privy Council; it first became an independent tribunal with some Privy Council elements under Henry VII, with jurisdiction mainly over matters of equity. The court became increasingly popular due to the lack of cost in bringing a case to it and the speed at which it processed them, in contrast with the slow and expensive common law courts, arousing the ire of common law lawyers and judges.^[8]

The court originally followed the monarch on his travels around England, visiting Sheen, Langley and Woodstock in 1494. Under Thomas Wolsey the court became fixed in Westminster, hearing cases from poor people and from the servants of the king.^[9] It met at the White Hall of the Palace of Westminster and was often referred to as the Court of White Hall. Towards the end of Henry VIII's reign, the court assumed a more professional status with the appointment of two "Masters of Requests Ordinary" to serve as its judges, where the Lord Privy Seal alone had previously heard and delivered judgements. Two additional "Masters of Requests Extraordinary" were appointed under Elizabeth I to accompany her on her progresses around England. Under James I two further Ordinary Masters were appointed, but despite this the court was criticised for the backlog arising from its increasing business.^[10]

When the court formally became an independent body in the 16th century, free of Privy Council control, it immediately became vulnerable to attack by the common-law courts, which asserted that it had no formal jurisdiction and that the Court of Chancery was an appropriate equitable body for cases. It was technically true that the court, as it was no longer part of the Privy Council, could not claim jurisdiction based on tradition, but in 1597 Sir Julius Caesar (then a Master of Requests Ordinary) gave examples of times when the common law courts had recognised the Court of Requests' jurisdiction as recently as 1585.^[11] The common law courts change of heart was undoubtedly due to the large amount of business deserting them for the Court of Requests, and in 1590 they went on the offensive; writs of habeas corpus were issued for people imprisoned for contempt of court in the Requests, judgments were issued in cases the Court of Requests were dealing with and it was decided that jailing an individual based on a writ from the Court of Requests constituted false imprisonment.^[12] Most academics accept that the court never recovered from these blows, and when the English Civil War made the privy seal inoperative, the court "died a natural death".^[13] The post of Master of Requests was abolished in 1685.

Other courts of requests

City of London

Another court of requests was by act of the Common Council of the City of London on 1 February 1518. It had jurisdiction over small debts under 40 shillings between citizens and tradesmen of the City of London. The judges of the court were two aldermen and four ancient discreet commoners. It was also called the Court of Conscience in the Guild Hall, where it met. Under James I, acts of Parliament were passed regulating its procedure, the ' (1 Jas. 1. c. 14) and the ' (3 Jas. 1. c. 15). These were the first acts of Parliament that gave validity to a court of requests.^[14] It was abolished by the London (City) Small Debts Act 1847 (10 & 11 Vict. c. lxxi), which transferred small debts process to the ancient Sheriff's Court.

Elsewhere in England

In the 18th and early 19th century small claims courts were established in various parts of England called "court of requests". The first of these was founded in Southwark by the ' (22 Geo. 2. c. 47).^[15][16] They were abolished by the County Courts Act 1846 (9 & 10 Vict. c. 95).

At the time of abolition, the schedule to the County Courts Act 1846 listed the following courts of requests/small claims courts as existing:

• Ashton-under-Lyne [
• Bath [
• Beverley [
• Birmingham [
• Blackheath [
• Bolingbroke and Horncastle [
• Boston [
• Bradford [
• Bristol Court of Requests^[d] [
• Bristol Court of Conscience^[e] [
• Brixton [
• Broseley [
• Canterbury [
• Chippenham [
• Cirencester [
• Codsheath [
• Deal [
• Derby [
• Doncaster [
• Dover [
• Ecclesall [
• Elloe [
• Isle of Ely [
• Exeter [
• Faversham [
• Folkestone [
• Gloucester [
• Gravesend [
• Great Grimsby [
• Hagnaby [
• Halesowen [
• Ipswich [
• Kidderminster [
• King's Lynn [
• Kingston-upon-Hull [
• Kirkby in Kendal [
• Lincoln [
• Liverpool [)
• Manchester [
• Margate [
• Middlesex [
• Newcastle-upon-Tyne [
• Norwich [
• Old Swinford [
• Pontefract Honor [
• Poulton [
• Rochester [
• Saint Albans [
• Saint Briavels [
• Sandwich [
• Sheffield [
• Shrewsbury [
• Southwark and East Brixton [
• Stockport [
• Tower Hamlets [
• Westbury [
• Westminster [
• Isle of Wight [
• Wolverhampton [
• Wraggoe [
• Great Yarmouth [

• Aberford [
• Ashby-de-la-Zouch [
• Barnsley [
• Belper [
• Blackburn [
• Blackheath [
• Bolton [
• Brighton [
• Burnley [
• Bury [
• Chesterfield [
• Crediton [
• East Retford [
• Eckington [
• Exeter [
• Gainsborough [
• Glossop [
• Grantham [
• Halifax [
• Hatfield [
• Hinckley [
• Hyde [
• Kingsnorton [
• Launceston [
• Leicester [
• Loughborough [
• Newark [
• New Sarum [
• New Sleaford [
• Newton Abbott [
• Nottingham [
• Oakham [
• Prestbury Division of the Hundred of Macclesfield [
• Prestwich-cum-Oldham [
• Roborough [
• Rochdale [
• Rotherham [
• Saint Helen's [
• Staffordshire Potteries [
• Tavistock [
• Totnes [
• Warrington [
• Westminster [
• Wigan [
• Wirksworth [

See also

• List of Masters of Requests – Chronological list of Masters of Requests
• Court of equity

Notes

1. ^ Start of session.
2. ^ Section 1.
3. ^ The Acts of Parliament (Commencement) Act 1793.
4. ^ The Bristol Court of Requests covered debts between £2 and £15.
5. ^ The Bristol Court of Conscience was less formal, and covered debts of up to £2.

References

1. ^ As found in ancient documents, eg Egregius Vir Wilhelmus Aubrey, L. L. Doctor, Regiae Majestati à Supplicum Libellis Magister, est Curiae Audientiae Cantuariensis Causarum & Negotiorum Auditor
2. ^ Spence (1846) p. 350
3. ^ Leadam (1898) p. x
4. ^ Pollard (1941) p. 301
5. ^ Alexander (1981) p. 67
6. ^ Kleineke (2007), pp. 22–32
7. ^ Carter (1902) p. 162
8. ^ Alexander (1981) p. 68
9. ^ Carter (1902) p. 163
10. ^ Carter (1902) p. 164
11. ^ Carter (1902) p. 165
12. ^ Carter (1902) p. 166
13. ^ Carter (1902) p. 167
14. ^ Leadam (1898) pp. liii–liv
15. ^ (Leadam 1898, p. liv)
16. ^ "Courts of Request". Victorian London

Bibliography

• Alexander, Michael (1981). The first of the Tudors: a study of Henry VII and his reign. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 0-7099-0503-3.
• Carter, Albert Thomas (1902). A History of English Legal Institutions. 2nd ed. London: Butterworth. OCLC 315400838
• Kleineke, Hannes (2007). "Richard III and the Origins of the Court of Requests". The Ricardian. Vol. XVII.
• Leadam, Isaac Saunders (1898). Selected Cases in the Court of Requests A.D. 1497-1569. Publications of the Selden Society, Volume XII. London: Bernard Quaritch.
• Pollard, Albert Fredrick (1941). "The Growth of the Court of Requests". The English Historical Review. 56 (222): 300–303. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ehr/lvi.ccxxii.300. ISSN 0013-8266
• Spence, George (1846). The Equitable Jurisdiction of the Court of Chancery. Volume 1. London: V. and R. Stevens and G. S. Norton.