Chresonym

{{short description|Term used in biodiversity informatics}} In biodiversity informatics, a '''chresonym''' is the cited use of an already-existing taxon name, usually a species name, within a publication. The term is derived from the Greek χρῆσις ''chresis'' meaning "a use"<ref name=Smiths>{{cite journal | doi = 10.2307/2412440| author = Smith, Hobart M| author2 = Rozella B Smith| name-list-style = amp| title = Chresonymy ex Synonymy| journal = Systematic Zoology| issn = 0039-7989| volume = 21| pages = 445| year = 1972| issue = 4| jstor = 2412440}}</ref> and refers to published usage of an existing name.

The technical meaning of the related term ''synonym'' is for different names that refer to the same object or concept. As noted by Hobart and Rozella B. Smith,<ref name=Smiths/> zoological systematists had been using "the term (synonymy) in another sense as well, namely in reference to all occurrences of any name or set of names (usually synonyms) in the literature." Such a "synonymy" could include multiple listings, one for each place the author found a name used, rather than a summarized list of different synonyms. The term "chresonym" was created to replace this second sense of the term "synonym."<ref name=Smiths/> The concept of synonymy is furthermore different in the zoological and botanical codes of nomenclature; under the ICZN, a synonym is an available name (i.e., it has its own description, authorship, date, and type specimens), while a chresonym is not.

A name that correctly refers to a taxon is further termed an '''orthochresonym''' while one that is applied incorrectly for a given taxon may be termed a '''heterochresonym'''.<ref>Dubois, A. (2000). "Synonymies and related lists in zoology: general proposals, with examples in herpetology". ''Dumerilia''. '''4''' (2): 33–98.</ref><ref>Dubois, A. (2010). [http://www.mapress.com/zootaxa/2010/f/zt02426p042.pdf "Retroactive changes should be introduced in the Code only with great care: problems related to the spellings of nomina"]. ''Zootaxa''. '''2426''': 1–42.</ref>

== Orthochresonymy == thumb|400px|alt=Page 116 in Hershkovitz (1969)|Page 116 in Hershkovitz (1969) showing the chresonym ''Physeter catodon'' Harmer 1928 Species names consist of a genus part and a species part to create a binomial name. Species names often also include a reference to the original publication of the name by including the author and sometimes the year of publication of the name. As an example, the sperm whale, ''Physeter catodon'', was first described by Carl Linnaeus in his landmark 1758 10th edition of ''Systema Naturae''. Thus, the name is correctly referenced as ''Physeter catodon'' Linnaeus, 1758. That name was also used by Harmer in 1928 to refer to the same species in the ''Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London'' and of course, it has appeared in numerous other publications since then. Taxonomic catalogues, such as ''Catalog of Living Whales'' by Philip Hershkovitz,<ref>{{Cite journal | issn = 0096-2961 | volume = 246 | pages = 1–259 | last = Hershkovitz | first = Philip | authorlink = Philip Hershkovitz | title = Catalog of Living Whales | journal = Bulletin of the United States National Museum | url=https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/33227 | year = 1966 }}</ref> may reference this usage with a Genus+species+authorship convention that may superficially appear to indicate a new species description (a homonym) but is instead referencing a particular subsequent usage of an existing species name (a chresonym). Hershkovitz, for example, cites "''Physeter catodon'', Harmer, 1928", which is the same name that Linnaeus published in 1758, but by convention, the epithets of chresonyms are set off from the author name by a comma (as in Hershkovitz' catalog) or semicolon, to distinguish them from available names.

== Heterochresonymy == ''Nepenthes rafflesiana'', a species of pitcher plant, was described by William Jack in 1835.<ref>{{cite journal|journal=Hookers Companion to the Botanical Magazine|year=1835|volume=1|pages=121–157, 219–224, 253–273|editor=William Jackson Hooker|editor-link=William Jackson Hooker|url=https://archive.org/details/companiontobota01hookgoog|title=Description of Malayan plants}}</ref> The name ''Nepenthes rafflesiana'' as used by Hugh Low in 1848 is a heterochresonym. Cheek and Jebb (2001)<ref name=Cheek&Jebb>{{cite book|author=Cheek, M.R.|author2=M.H.P. Jebb|name-list-style=amp|year=2001|title=Nepenthaceae|publisher=National Herbarium of the Netherlands|series=Flora Malesiana|volume=15}}</ref> explain the situation thus: <blockquote>Low, ... accidentally, or otherwise, had described what we know as ''N. rafflesiana'' as ''Nepenthes × hookeriana'' and vice versa in his book "Sarawak, its Inhabitants and Productions" (1848). Masters was the first author to note this in the Gardeners' Chronicle<ref>{{cite journal|url=https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/84372|journal=The Gardeners' Chronicle|pages=812–813|title=New garden plants: ''Nepenthes hookeriana''|author=Maxwell Tylden Masters|year=1881}}</ref>..., where he gives the first full description and illustration of ''Nepenthes × hookeriana''.</blockquote> The description that Maxwell Tylden Masters provided in 1881 for the taxon that had previously been known to gardeners as ''Nepenthes hookeriana'' (an interchangeable form of the name for the hybrid ''Nepenthes × hookeriana'') differs from Low's description. The International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants does not require that descriptions from so long ago include specification of a type specimen, and types can be chosen later to fit these old names. Since the descriptions differ, Low's and Masters' name have different types. Masters therefore created a later homonym, which, according to the rules of the code is illegitimate.

==References== {{Reflist|2}}

Category:Biodiversity Category:Taxonomy (biology)