'''Esegels''' (aka ''Izgil'' ({{langx|otk|𐰔𐰏𐰠}}), ''Äsägel'', ''Askel'', ''Askil'', ''Ishkil'', ''Izgil'') were an Oghur Turkic dynastic tribe in the Middle Ages who joined and would be assimilated into the Volga Bulgars.
Numerous records about Esegels in sources and works of many languages across the span of the Eurasia left numerous variations of their name.<ref>Golden P.B., ''"Khazar studies. Historico-philological inguiry into the origins of the Khazars"'', Vol. 1, Budapest, Akadémiai Kiadó, 1980</ref> M. Räsänen suggested Uralo-Altai etymology of this word: ''Es-kil'', ''Es-gil'' "Old city",<ref>Räsänen M. ''"Uralaltaische Wortforschungen"'' // STUDIA ORIENTALIA, 18–3, 1955, p. 5, in Golden P.B., ''"Khazar studies"'', p. 241</ref> Gumilyov initially linked the Izgils to the ''Sijie'' (思结) of the Toquz Oghuz;<ref>Gumilyov, L. (1964) ''Ancient Turks''. p. 265. (in Russian)</ref><ref>Golden, Peter B. (1992). An Introduction to the History of the Turkic People. Otto Harrassowitz, Wiesbaden. p. 143</ref> only to later re-identify Izgils with ''Xijie'' (奚結), another Tiele tribe.<ref>''Old Book of Tang'', [https://zh.wikisource.org/wiki/%E8%88%8A%E5%94%90%E6%9B%B8/%E5%8D%B7199%E4%B8%8B#%E9%90%B5%E5%8B%92 Vol. 199b Tiele]</ref><ref>Gumilyov, L. (2009) ''Searches for an Imaginary Kingdom: The Legend of the Kingdom of Prester John''. p. 340 (in English; translated by R.E.F. Smith). [http://gumilevica.kulichki.net/SIK/sik05d.htm#sik05chapter14-3 Russian original]; quote: "Изгили (кит. Сицзе [= pinyin Xijie])"</ref> However, Zuev (2002) distinguished '''Izgil''' (> Ch. *''a-siək-kiet'' 阿悉結 > ''Axijie'', a Western Tujue tribe according to Chinese sources<ref>''Tongdian'' [https://zh.wikisource.org/wiki/%E9%80%9A%E5%85%B8/%E5%8D%B7199#%E7%AA%81%E5%8E%A5%E4%B8%8B vol. 199 "Beidi 6: Tujue B"]</ref><ref>''Old Book of Tang'' [https://zh.m.wikisource.org/zh-hant/%E8%88%8A%E5%94%90%E6%9B%B8/%E5%8D%B7194%E4%B8%8B vol. 194 "Tujue B: Western Tujue"]</ref>{{efn|In imperial Chinese historiography, ''Tūjué'' 突厥 was reserved for Göktürks, their splinter groups, and politically associated groups, not all Turkic peoples<ref>Lee, Joo-Yup (2016).[https://www.academia.edu/35007944/_The_Historical_Meaning_of_the_Term_Turk_and_the_Nature_of_the_Turkic_Identity_of_the_Chinggisid_and_Timurid_Elites_in_Post_Mongol_Central_Asia_Central_Asiatic_Journal_59_2016_101_32 "The Historical Meaning of the Term Turk and the Nature of the Turkic Identity of the Chinggisid and Timurid Elites in Post-Mongol Central Asia"]. Central Asiatic Journal 59(1-2): p. 103-105 of pp. 101–32.</ref>}}) from '''Igil''' (> Ch. *''ɣiei-kiet'' 奚結 > ''Xijie'', a Tiele tribe<ref>''Old Book of Tang'', [https://zh.wikisource.org/wiki/%E8%88%8A%E5%94%90%E6%9B%B8/%E5%8D%B7199%E4%B8%8B#%E9%90%B5%E5%8B%92 Vol. 199b Tiele]</ref>) though Zuev controversially links the Igils 奚結 to the Bulgarian clan Uokil and the Indo-European-speaking ''Augaloi''<ref>Blažek, V. & Schwartz, M. "Tocharians: Who they were, where they came from, and where they lived" in ''Tocharian Studies: Works 1'' (2011), p. 119</ref> in Transoxania.<ref>Wang Pu, "''Summary review of Tang dynasty, 618–907 (Tang Huiyao)''", Shanghai, 1958, ch. 72, p. 1307, in Yu. Zuev, ''"Early Türks: Sketches of history and ideology"'' (2002), p. 45</ref>
Róna-Tas proposes an Iranian origin: Western Old Turkic ''Askil'', ''Äsägäl'' < ''äθägäl'' < ''haθyaka arya'' "the very aliens" (cf. Ossetian ''æcægælon'' < ''æcægæ'' + ''ælon'').<ref>Róna-Tas, András "Bayan and Asparuh. Nine Notes on Turks and Iranians in East Europe", ''Turcologia'' 105, Harrassowitz Verlag, Wiesbaden (2016). pp. 65-78</ref> However, Tatár (2012) disagrees that Ossetian ''æcægælon'' was cognate with ''Äskäl'', as the expected Hungarian cognate to Ossetian would have been **''Æčgæl'' (Hg. **''Ecsgel''), not ''székely'', the Székely people's endonym which, in Tatár's opinion, might have developed from ''Äskil'' with these sound-changes: loss of first vowel before or after another vowel's appearance between /s/ & /k/, not in Hungarian but in a foreign source language. Tatár reconstructs *''Äskil'' as the Western Turkic tribe's endonym, containing Turkic plural and generalizational suffix ''-GIl''<ref>Alyılmaz, Semra. [https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1151689.pdf "On Plurality Category and Teaching in Turkish"] in ''Journal of Education and Training Studies'', Vol. 5, No. 9; September 2017</ref> and Iranian tribal name ''As''; she proposes that the As had been originally part of Iranian-speaking Massagetae and joined the Alans in the 1st century CE, yet one group later split from the Iranian-speaking As community, became allies or subjects of the Turks and subsequently Turkicized as Äskils, only to later become enemies of the Second Turkic Khaganate.<ref>Tatár, Maria Magdolna. "Red Huns and Hungarian Székelys: Etymological Remarks to the Tradition" in ''Hsiung-nu Empire and the Study of Ancient Mongolian History''. Published by Institute of History, Mongolian Academy of Sciences, Ulaanbataar. 2012. pages 32-38 of 31-43</ref> Tatár also remarks that if ''székely'' had developed from ''æcægæl'' (even in a Turkic source language and not Hungarian), "the Volga Bulgarian Äskils and the Székelys must be of different origin because ''æcægæl'' is not the source of Askil."<ref>Tatár (2012). p. 38</ref>
Zuev proposes connections with the ''Āxījiē'' of the Nushibi half of the Ten Arrows tribal confederation of the Western Turkic Khaganate, and the Xionite personal name ''Askil/Askel'', as mentioned in the ''Chronography'' of Theophanes the Confessor (760–818):
<blockquote>''"the same month (July 563) ambassadors of Askil/Askel, the king of Hermihions (Greek Ερμηχιονιονων; Lat. Ermechionorum), a tribe living among barbarians near the ocean, came to Constantinople"''.<ref>Zuev Yu.A. "The Strongest Tribe". ''Historical And Cultural Relations Between Iran And Dasht-i Kipchak in the 13-18th c.c. Materials of International Round Table'', Almaty, 2004 {{ISBN|9965-699-14-3}}. p. 33 (in Russian)</ref></blockquote>
Zuev (2004)<ref>Zuev (2004) p. 45, 47-48</ref> summarized scholarly opinions on the link between Izgils and Turkic-speaking tribes mentioned by sources in Chinese: *Cen Zhongmian (1958) identified Izgils with the ''Axijie'' 阿悉結 (a Tiele tribe according to Naito) of the Western Turks, as did Harmatta (1962:140-142) and Klyashtorny (2001:50-51); *Cen additionally identified ''Izgil'' with the name ''Xiezhilue'' 頡質略 of a Bayïrqu ruler; *Ögel (1945) and Tasağil (1991:57) linked ''Izgil'' and ''Sekel'' to the Sijie 思結 of the Tiele and later Toquz Oghuz; *Ögel further links the Sijie, Axijie, and Izgil to the Chigils; however, Zuev noted that the Chigils (whom he elsewhere identified with the Chuyue (處月) in Chinese sources<ref>Zuev (2002) ''Early Turks: Essays of history and ideology'', Almaty, Daik-Press, 2002, p. 145, 250</ref>) did not belong to the "Ten Arrows" union<ref>Zuev (2004). p. 59</ref> while Axijie did.<ref>Old Book of Tang, [https://zh.wikisource.org/wiki/%E8%88%8A%E5%94%90%E6%9B%B8/%E5%8D%B7194%E4%B8%8B Vol. 194b]</ref>
A Chinese annalistic account in New Book of Tang about the Western Turkic Khaganate in 651 CE listed five west tribes collectively as Nushibi (弩失畢) and noted that ''Kül-Irkin'' (闕俟斤 Què-sìjīn), the leader of first tribe, Āxījiē (阿悉結), (whom Zuev identifies as Esegels) "was most prosperous and strong, the number of his soldiers reached several tens of thousands".<ref>Zuev (2004) p. 47, with reference to</ref><ref>Ouyang Xiu, ''"Xin Tang shu (History of Tang dynasty"'', 618–907, New Edition)], Peking, Bo-na, 1958, Ch. 215b, p. 1506, f. 56</ref>
Arab ambassador Ibn Fadlan, who visited Itil (''Volga'') banks in the 921–922, mentioned in his journal the Bulgarian tribe ''Askel'', besides the Bulgars proper, the Suvars (Savan), the Bersula, and the Barandzhar.<ref>Kovalevsky A.P. ''"Ahmed ibn Fadlan's book on travel to Volga in 921–922"'', Kharkiv, 1956, p. 139 (''Translation'')</ref><ref>{{cite book|last= Rorlich|first=A zade-Ayşe|title= The Volga Tatars: A Profile in National Resilience|chapter= 2. The Bulgar State|publisher= Hoover Institution Press; 1st edition|year= 1986|series= Hoover Institution Press Publication (Book 339)}}</ref> Persian ethnographer Ahmad ibn Rustah listed three branches of the Volga Bulghars: "the first branch was called Bersula, the second Esegel, and the third Oghuz".<ref>{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=VZ1LAQAAMAAJ&dq=Magyars+called+RUs&pg=PR13 |title=Publications of the Folk-lore Society |date=1889 |publisher=Folk-lore Society |language=en}}</ref> The ancient ruins of the city belonging to the ''Askel'' tribe are located in Aşlı<ref>{{cite book |author=D. Dimitrov |date=1987 |chapter=Sabirs, Barsils, Belendzheris, Khazars |title=Prabylgarite po severnoto i zapadnoto Chernomorie |url=http://www.kroraina.com/p_bulgar/p_bulg1b.htm |work=kroraina.com |place=Varna}}</ref>
Among other writers who mentioned Esegels, the Persian “Geography“ of 982 named ''Ishkils'' as one of three Bulgarian tribes, who were constantly conflicting among themselves.<ref>Minorsky V., ''"Hudud al-'Alam" (The regions of the World'', London, 1937, p. 162)</ref> Gardizi, the author of the composition ''Zain al-ahbar'' (mid-11th century), wrote: ''"Between possessions of Bulgars and possessions of Eskels, who also belong to Bulgars, is a Magyar area. These Magyars are also a Türkic tribe"''.<ref>Bartold W., ''"Extracts from Gardizi composition "Za ahbar"'' //Collection of Works, vol. 5. Moscow-Leningrad, 1973, p. 37, 58</ref> Constantine Porphyrogenitus wrote that endoethnonym of the "Magyar Türks" was ''Savartoiaskaloi'', i.e. ''Savart'' (Suvar/Sabir) and ''Eskel''.<ref>Vasari I., ''"Runic systems of the Eastern Europe script"'' // Altaica 2, Moscow, 1998, p. 37</ref> Zuev summarized that "It is held that Eskels (Esegels) merged with Hungarians (Magyars). Zuev proposes that the ethnographic group ''Székely'' (also known as Szekler) are Esegels' descendants."<ref>Zuev (2004) p. 34</ref> However, Róna-Tas rejected identification of Esegels with Székely, as well as the link between the names Esegels and Chigils, on historical and phonological grounds.<ref>Róna-Tas, András. "Bayan and Asparuh. Nine Notes on Turks and Iranians in East Europe", ''Turcologia'' 105, Harrassowitz Verlag, Wiesbaden (2016). pp. 65-78</ref>
==Notes== {{notelist}}
==References== {{reflist}}
{{Turkic peoples}}
Category:History of Tatarstan Category:Volga Bulgaria Category:Nomadic groups in Eurasia Category:Turkic peoples