{{Short description|Assembly of photovoltaic cells used to generate electricity}} {{For|solar thermal panels|solar thermal collector|solar thermal energy}} {{Use dmy dates|date=February 2026}} [[File:Dji fly 20230602 13826 PM 27 1719032149374 photo optimized.jpg|thumb|300px|Greencap Energy solar array mounted on brewery in Worthing, England]] thumb|300px|Solar array mounted on a rooftop

A '''solar panel''' is a device that converts sunlight into electricity by using multiple solar modules that consists of photovoltaic (PV) cells. PV cells are made of materials that produce excited electrons when exposed to light. These electrons flow through a circuit and produce direct current electricity, which can be used to power various devices or be stored in batteries. Solar panels can be known as '''solar cell panels''', or '''solar electric panels'''.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Green |first=Martin A. |title=Solar cells: operating principles, technology and system applications |date=1998 |publisher=Univ. of New South Wales |isbn=978-0-85823-580-9 |edition=Repr. [der Ausg.] Englewood Cliffs, NJ 1982 |location=Kensington, NSW}}</ref><ref>{{Cite magazine |last1=Yang |first1=Zeyi |title=Africa Is Buying a Record Number of Chinese Solar Panels |magazine=Wired |url=https://www.wired.com/story/african-imports-of-chinese-solar-panels-increase/}}</ref>

Solar panels are usually arranged in groups called arrays or systems. A photovoltaic system consists of one or more solar panels, an inverter that converts direct current electricity to alternating current where it is necessary, and sometimes other components such as charge controllers, meters, or solar trackers to maximize direct sunlight. Most panels are in solar farms or rooftop solar panels, which supply the electricity grid.

Solar panels use a renewable and clean source of energy, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions compared to hydrocarbon-sourced energy. However, they depend on the availability and intensity of sunlight, require cleaning, and have high initial costs. Solar panels are widely used for residential, commercial, and industrial purposes, as well as in space, often together with batteries.

== History == {{See also|Solar cell#History|Timeline of solar cells|Growth of photovoltaics}}

===Early developments===

In 1839, the ability of some materials to create an electrical charge from light exposure was first observed by the French physicist Edmond Becquerel.<ref name=":0">{{cite journal|date=April 2009|title=April 25, 1954: Bell Labs Demonstrates the First Practical Silicon Solar Cell|url=http://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/200904/physicshistory.cfm|journal=APS News|publisher=American Physical Society|volume=18|issue=4}}</ref> Though these initial solar cells were too inefficient for even simple electric devices, they were used as an instrument to measure light.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Christian|first1=M|title=The history of the invention of the solar panel summary.|url=https://www.energymatters.com.au/panels-modules/|access-date=25 January 2019|website=Engergymatters.com|publisher=Energymatters.com}}</ref>

The observation by Becquerel was not replicated again until 1873, when the English electrical engineer Willoughby Smith discovered that the charge could be caused by light hitting selenium. After this discovery, William Grylls Adams and Richard Evans Day published "The action of light on selenium" in 1876, describing the experiment they used to replicate Smith's results.<ref name=":0" /><ref>{{cite journal|last1=Adams|first1=William Grylls|last2=Day|first2=R. E.|date=1 January 1877|title=IX. The action of light on selenium|journal=Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London|language=en|volume=167|issue=167 |pages=313–316|doi=10.1098/rstl.1877.0009|issn=0261-0523|doi-access=}}</ref>

In 1881, the American inventor Charles Fritts created the first commercial solar cell, which was reported by Fritts as "continuous, constant and of considerable force not only by exposure to sunlight but also to dim, diffused daylight".<ref>{{cite news |last1=Meyers |first1=Glenn |date=31 December 2014 |title=Photovoltaic Dreaming 1875--1905: First Attempts At Commercializing PV |url=https://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/31/photovoltaic-dreaming-first-attempts-commercializing-pv/ |access-date=7 September 2018 |work=cleantechnica.com |publisher=Sustainable Enterprises Media Inc. |agency=CleanTechnica}}</ref><ref>{{cite magazine |title=A Brief History of Solar Panels |first1=Elizabeth |last1=Chu |first2=D. Lawrence |last2=Tarazano |magazine=Smithsonian Magazine |url=https://www.smithsonianmag.com/sponsored/brief-history-solar-panels-180972006/ |date=22 April 2019}} </ref> However, these solar cells were still very inefficient for practical power production, especially compared to coal-fired power plants.

In 1939, Russell Ohl created the solar cell design that is used in many modern solar panels. He patented his design in 1941.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Ohl|first1=Russell|date=27 May 1941|title=Light-sensitive electric device|url=https://patents.google.com/patent/US2402662|access-date=7 September 2018}}</ref> In 1954, this design was first used by Bell Labs to create the first commercially viable silicon solar cell.<ref name=":0" />

===Exponential growth ===

{{Multiple image |direction = vertical | width = 250 | image1 = Price history of silicon PV cells since 1977.svg | caption1 = Price per watt history for conventional (c-Si) solar cells since 1977 | image2 = World solar generation yearly.png | caption2 = Yearly solar generation by continent }} Falling costs have been the biggest factor in the recent exponential growth of Solar energy. Since 2010, the cost of solar photovoltaic electricity has fallen 85%<ref>{{cite web | last1=Jaeger | first1=Joel | title=Explaining the Exponential Growth of Renewable Energy | date=20 September 2021 | url=https://www.wri.org/insights/growth-renewable-energy-sector-explained }}</ref> Solar panel installers saw significant growth between 2008 and 2013.<ref>{{cite web |date= |title=Solar Industry Data |url=http://www.seia.org/research-resources/solar-industry-data |access-date=13 January 2014 |publisher=SEIA}}</ref> Due to that growth many installers had projects that were not "ideal" solar roof tops to work with and had to find solutions to shaded roofs and orientation difficulties.<ref>{{cite web |date=September 2007 |title=California Rooftop Photovoltaic (PV) Resource Assessment and Growth Potential by County |url=https://www.energy.ca.gov/2007publications/CEC-500-2007-048/CEC-500-2007-048.PDF |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131213194550/https://www.energy.ca.gov/2007publications/CEC-500-2007-048/CEC-500-2007-048.PDF |archive-date=13 December 2013 |access-date=28 September 2022 |website=California Energy Commission}}</ref> This challenge was initially addressed by the re-popularization of micro-inverters and later the invention of power optimizers.

Solar panel manufacturers partnered with micro-inverter companies to create alternating current modules and power optimizer companies partnered with module manufacturers to create smart modules.<ref>{{cite web |date=23 October 2012 |title=Solar Module OEMs Seeking Advantage With Inverter Electronics |url=http://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/Solar-Module-OEMs-Seeking-Advantage-with-Inverter-Electronics |access-date=13 January 2014 |publisher=Greentech Media}}</ref> In 2013 many solar panel manufacturers announced and began shipping their smart module solutions.<ref>{{cite web |date=28 February 2012 |title=Leading Solar Module OEMs To Display Next-generation Tigo Energy Technology During PV Expo Japan |url=http://www.tigoenergy.com/press-releases/leading-solar-module-oems-display-next-generation-tigo-energy-technology-during-pv |access-date=13 January 2014 |publisher=Tigo Energy |archive-date=12 August 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120812095050/http://www.tigoenergy.com/press-releases/leading-solar-module-oems-display-next-generation-tigo-energy-technology-during-pv }}</ref>

Between 1992 and 2023, the worldwide usage of photovoltaics (PV) increased exponentially. During this period, it evolved from a niche market of small-scale applications to a mainstream electricity source. From 2016 to 2022, PV has seen an annual capacity and production growth rate of around 26%, doubling approximately every three years.<!-- per WP:CALC using average growth over the six year span from 2016 to 2022 from 306.5 to 1225 GWp by taking the sixth root of the ratio--><ref>{{Cite web |last=Jaeger |first=Joel |date=20 September 2021 |title=Explaining the Exponential Growth of Renewable Energy |url=https://www.wri.org/insights/growth-renewable-energy-sector-explained |language=en}}</ref> By the end of 2022, the global cumulative installed PV capacity reached about 1,185 gigawatts (GW), supplying over 6% of global electricity demand,<ref name=":2">[https://iea-pvps.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/IEA_PVPS_Snapshot_2023.pdf Snapshot of Global PV Markets 2023], IEA Photovoltaic Power Systems Programme.</ref> up from about 3% in 2019.<ref>{{cite journal |title=Snapshot 2020 – IEA-PVPS |url=https://iea-pvps.org/snapshot-reports/snapshot-2020/ |website=iea-pvps.org |date=20 April 2020 |access-date=10 May 2020}}</ref>

The decreasing cost of solar panels is driving an increase in solar energy use in the Global South. Many countries in the Global South rely on expensive fossil fuel imports. Many homes and businesses are switching to solar energy to save money<ref>{{cite web | title=Cheap Solar Panels Are Changing the World | website=The Atlantic | date=23 October 2024 | url=https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2024/10/solar-power-energy-revolution-global-south/680351/ }}</ref>

== Theory and construction == {{See also|Solar cell}} [[File:From a solar cell to a PV system.svg|thumb|upright=1.25|From a solar cell to a PV system]]

Photovoltaic modules consist of a large number of solar cells and use light energy from the Sun to generate electricity through the photovoltaic effect. Most modules use wafer-based crystalline silicon cells or thin-film cells. The structural (load carrying) member of a module can be either the top layer or the back layer. Cells must be protected from mechanical damage and moisture. The cells and modules are usually connected electrically in series, one to another to increase the desired voltage output, and then in parallel to increase current output to create the solar panel. Most panels are rigid, but semi-flexible ones based on thin-film cells are also available. The power (in watts) of the solar panel is the voltage (in volts) multiplied by the current (in amperes), and depends both on the amount of light and on the electrical load connected to the panel. The manufacturing specifications on solar panels are obtained under standard conditions, which are usually not the true operating conditions the solar panels are exposed to on the installation site.<ref>{{cite web |title=Solar panels |url=https://www.energy.gov.au/solar/get-know-solar-technology/solar-panels |publisher=Australian Government – energy.gov.au |access-date=17 November 2025 |quote=The rated capacity of a solar panel is the power a panel will generate under standard test conditions. But the actual power generated is usually less than this, and depends on climate zone, weather conditions and other factors.}}</ref> A PV junction box is attached to the back of the solar panel and functions as its output interface. External connections for most photovoltaic modules use MC4 connectors to facilitate easy weatherproof connections to the rest of the system. A USB power interface can also be used.<ref>{{cite web | last=Kinsella | first=Pat | title=Are solar chargers worth it: a useful tool or a flash in the pan gimmick? | website=advnture.com | date=3 June 2021 | url=https://www.advnture.com/features/should-i-buy-a-portable-solar-power-charger | access-date=16 February 2022}}</ref>

Solar panels also use metal frames consisting of racking components, brackets, reflector shapes, and troughs to better support the panel structure.<ref>{{Cite web |last=U.S. Department of Energy |date=3 December 2024 |title=Solar Energy Supply Chain Review Report |url=https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2024-12/Solar%2520Energy%2520Supply%2520Chain%2520Report%2520-%2520Final%5B1%5D.pdf |access-date=30 May 2025 |website=energy.gov |quote=Mounting structures typically consist of low-cost steel components that provide mechanical support and can be configured as fixed-tilt or tracking systems, depending on application.}}</ref>

=== Cell connection techniques === Solar cells need to be connected together by electrodes to form a module, with front electrodes blocking the solar cell front optical surface area slightly. To improve solar cell efficiency manufacturers maximize frontal surface area available for sunlight and improve sunlight absorption using chronologically adopted,<ref>{{Cite web |last1=Barrows |first1=It's no secret that prices throughout the solar supply chain have been at rock bottom over the past 18 months Alex |last2=crash |first2=Molly Morgan of CRU Group explore how the market reached the imbalance that caused PV prices to |last3=Innovation |first3=What This Has Meant for |last4=Magazine |first4=How It Might Affect Future Technology Transitions Pv |date=1 August 2025 |title=Non-stop solar innovation despite module oversupply |url=https://www.pv-magazine.com/2025/08/01/non-stop-solar-innovation-despite-module-oversupply/ |access-date=6 August 2025 |website=pv magazine International |language=en-US}}</ref> varying rear electrode solar cell connection techniques:

* Aluminum back surface field (Al-BSF), a vintage technology, uses full aluminum rear contact face<ref name=":1">{{Cite web |date=19 January 2018 |title=PERC Solar Cells |url=https://pv-manufacturing.org/perc-solar-cells/ |access-date=6 August 2025 |website=PV-Manufacturing.org |language=en-US}}</ref> * Passivated emitter rear contact (PERC) uses a reduced aluminum rear contact face and adds a polymer film where aluminum was removed to capture light<ref name=":3">{{Cite web |title=TOPCon Solar Cells: The New PV Module Technology in the Solar Industry |url=https://solarmagazine.com/solar-panels/topcon-solar-cells/ |access-date=21 February 2025 |website=Solar Magazine |language=en-US}}</ref><ref name=":1" /> * Tunnel oxide passivated contact (TOPCon) uses increasingly smaller silver bus bars and adds an oxidation layer with a rough surface to the PERC polymer film to capture more light<ref>{{Cite web |last=Chan |first=Keng Siew |date=21 November 2019 |title=What is a TOPCON solar cell? - |url=https://www.kschan.com/what-is-a-topcon-solar-cell/ |access-date=11 November 2022 |language=en-US}}</ref><ref name=":3" /><ref>{{Cite patent|number=US11824136B2|title=Solar cell, manufacturing method thereof, and photovoltaic module|gdate=2023-11-21|invent1=Yu|invent2=Liu|invent3=Zhang|inventor1-first=Kun|inventor2-first=Changming|inventor3-first=Xinyu|url=https://patents.google.com/patent/US11824136B2/en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=11 June 2023 |title=Tunnel Oxide Passivated Contact (TOPCon) Solar Cells |url=https://pv-manufacturing.org/tunnel-oxide-passivated-contact-topcon-solar-cells/ |access-date=6 August 2025 |website=PV-Manufacturing.org |language=en-US}}</ref> * Interdigitated back contact (IBC) places contacts fully on the back allowing full frontal light exposure to capture even more light<ref>{{Cite web |title=Solar Cell Technology BSF PERC TOPCON HJT IBC - Knowledge |url=https://www.dsneg.com/info/solar-cell-technology-bsf-perc-topcon-hjt-ibc-59069656.html |access-date=11 November 2022 |website=DS New Energy |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=19 January 2018 |title=All back contact solar cells |url=https://pv-manufacturing.org/all-back-contact-solar-cells/ |access-date=6 August 2025 |website=PV-Manufacturing.org |language=en-US}}</ref> * Extended back contact (XBC) uses a combination of the above technologies<ref>{{Cite web |title=BC vs TOPCon vs XBC Solar Panels: Which Technology Is Best for Your Projects? |url=https://couleenergy.com/bc-vs-topcon-vs-xbc-solar-panels-which-technology-is-best-for-your-projects/ |access-date=6 August 2025 |website=couleenergy.com/ |language=en-US}}</ref> Tandem solar cells use one of the above connection techniques and a combination of cell chemistries to form a solar cell.<ref>{{Cite web |last1=Barrows |first1=It's no secret that prices throughout the solar supply chain have been at rock bottom over the past 18 months Alex |last2=crash |first2=Molly Morgan of CRU Group explore how the market reached the imbalance that caused PV prices to |last3=Innovation |first3=What This Has Meant for |last4=Magazine |first4=How It Might Affect Future Technology Transitions Pv |date=1 August 2025 |title=Non-stop solar innovation despite module oversupply |url=https://www.pv-magazine.com/2025/08/01/non-stop-solar-innovation-despite-module-oversupply/ |access-date=7 August 2025 |website=pv magazine International |language=en-US}}</ref>

=== Arrays of solar panels === A single solar panel can produce only a limited amount of power; most installations contain multiple panels adding their voltages or currents. A photovoltaic system typically includes an array of photovoltaic modules, an inverter, a battery pack for energy storage, a charge controller, interconnection wiring, circuit breakers, fuses, disconnect switches, voltage meters, and optionally a solar tracking mechanism. Equipment is carefully selected to optimize energy output and storage, reduce power transmission losses, and many times convert from direct current to alternating current.

=== Smart solar panels === thumb|300px|Smart module Smart solar panels have power electronics embedded in the panel and are different from traditional solar panels with power electronics attached to the frame or connected to the photovoltaic circuit through a connector.<ref>{{cite web |date=23 August 2012 |title=Solar Electronics, Panel Integration and the Bankability Challenge |url=http://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/solar-electronics-panel-integration-and-the-bankability-challenge |access-date=13 January 2014 |publisher=Greentech Media}}</ref> Solar power electronics can be used for:

* Maximum power point tracking power optimizers, a technology developed to maximize the power harvest from solar photovoltaic systems by compensating for shading effects, wherein a shadow falling on a section of a module causes the electrical output of one or more strings of cells in the module to fall to near zero, but not having the output of the entire module fall to zero.<ref>{{Cite web |date=15 October 2021 |title=Do Solar Panels Work In The Shade? A Complete Guide To Solar Panel Shading, Its Effect, And Its Solutions |url=https://www.renewablewise.com/do-solar-panels-work-in-the-shade/ |access-date=11 November 2022 |website=www.renewablewise.com |language=en-us}}</ref> * Solar performance monitors for data collection * Fault detection for enhanced safety<ref>{{Cite web |date=4 June 2021 |title=Smart PV Modules |url=https://www.eitci.org/technology-certification/sesg/smart-pv |access-date=30 May 2025 |website=European Information Technologies Certification Institute |quote=Smart PV modules contain integrated power electronics, enabling features such as module-level maximum power point tracking, real-time monitoring and fault detection, and enhanced fire safety through rapid shutdown capabilities.}}</ref>

=== Technology === {{Main article|Crystalline silicon|Thin-film solar cell}} thumb|300px|Market-share of PV technologies since 1980

Most solar modules are currently produced from crystalline silicon (c-Si) solar cells made of polycrystalline or monocrystalline silicon. In 2021, crystalline silicon accounted for 95% of worldwide PV production,<ref>{{Cite web |title=Photovoltaics Report |url=https://www.ise.fraunhofer.de/content/dam/ise/de/documents/publications/studies/Photovoltaics-Report.pdf}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Teixeira |first1=Bernardo |last2=Centeno Brito |first2=Miguel |last3=Mateus |first3=Antonio |date=2024 |title=Raw materials for the Portuguese decarbonization roadmap: The case of solar photovoltaics and wind energy |journal=Resources Policy |language=en |volume=90 |issue=104839 |article-number=104839 |doi=10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104839|doi-access=free |bibcode=2024RePol..9004839T }}</ref> while the rest of the overall market is made up of thin-film technologies using cadmium telluride (CdTe), copper indium gallium selenide and amorphous silicon {{nowrap|(a-Si)}}.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ise.fraunhofer.de/en/downloads-englisch/pdf-files-englisch/photovoltaics-report-slides.pdf|title=Photovoltaics Report|website=Fraunhofer ISE|date=28 July 2014|pages= 18, 19}}</ref>

Bifacial cells produce energy on both sides which increases the total output of the module, this boost depends on the reflectivity of the surroundings and benefits from raised constructions since more light can reach the rear side. The gain is situational, the rear side benefits more from high-albedo surroundings such as snow, raised constructions and overcast weather but the gains might be minimal when the panels are installed directly on a surface with little clearance making it not cost-effective in those cases. The price of bifacial cells has dropped enough to be close to monofacial technologies, because of this as of 2024, bifacial panels are the leading choice for utility-scale PV installations.<ref>{{Cite web |last1=systems |first1=The latest report from the International Energy Agency’s Photovoltaic Power Systems Programmecovers best practices for the optimization of bifacial PV tracking |last2=Jowett |first2=discusses key areas for improvement Patrick |date=15 August 2024 |title=Bifacial tracking systems dominate utility-scale PV market |url=https://www.pv-magazine.com/2024/08/15/bifacial-tracking-systems-dominate-utility-scale-pv-market/ |access-date=24 November 2025 |website=pv magazine International |language=en-US}}</ref>

Emerging, third-generation solar technologies use advanced thin-film cells. They produce a relatively high-efficiency conversion for a lower cost compared with other solar technologies. Also, high-cost, high-efficiency, and close-packed rectangular multi-junction solar cells are usually used in solar panels on spacecraft, as they offer the highest ratio of generated power per kilogram lifted into space. Multi-junction cells are compound semiconductors and made of gallium arsenide and other semiconductor materials. Another emerging PV technology using multi-junction cells is concentrator photovoltaics.

==== Thin film ==== {{Excerpt|Thin-film solar cell}}

=== Concentrator === Some special solar PV modules include concentrators in which light is focused by lenses or mirrors onto smaller cells. This enables the cost-effective use of highly efficient, but expensive cells (such as gallium arsenide) with the trade-off of using a higher solar exposure area.<ref>{{Cite web |last1=Horowitz |first1=Kurt |last2=Woodhouse |first2=Michael |date=1 October 2015 |title=Current Status of Concentrator Photovoltaic (CPV) Technology |url=https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy16osti/65130.pdf |access-date=27 May 2025 |website=National Renewable Energy Laboratory |quote=Some special solar PV modules include concentrators in which light is focused by lenses or mirrors onto smaller cells.}}</ref> Concentrating the sunlight can also raise the efficiency to around 45%.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Paul Marks |title=Space solar: The global race to tap the sun's energy from orbit |journal=New Scientist |date=13 February 2016 |url=https://www.newscientist.com/article/2076599-space-solar-the-global-race-to-tap-the-suns-energy-from-orbit/}}</ref>

===Light capture===

The amount of light absorbed by a solar cell depends on the sunlight angle of incidence and intensity. Light absorption varies because the amount falling on the panel is proportional to the cosine of the angle of incidence, and partly because at high angle of incidence more light is reflected. Modules usually are faced south (in the Northern Hemisphere) or north (in the Southern Hemisphere) with a particular tilt calculated according to the latitude, to maximize total energy output over a day. Solar tracking can be used to adjust the tilt angle from dawn to dusk, to keep the angle of incidence small.

Vertical orientation of bi-facial panels are oriented north south and capture the most light from the east in the morning and west in the afternoon.

Photovoltaic manufacturers have been working to decrease reflectance with improved anti-reflective coatings or with textures.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Rajinder Sharma |title=Effect of obliquity of incident light on the performance of silicon solar cells |journal=Heliyon |date=Jul 2019 |volume=5 |issue=7 |article-number=e01965 |doi=10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01965 |doi-access=free |pmid=31317080 |pmc=6611928|bibcode=2019Heliy...501965S }}</ref><ref>{{cite thesis |last=Janakeeraman|first=Suryanarayana Vasantha |date=May 2013 |title=Angle of Incidence And Power Degradation Analysis of Photovoltaic Modules |url=https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/79566658.pdf |type=MSt |chapter= |publisher=Arizona State University |docket= |oclc= |access-date=1 May 2023}}</ref> Anti-reflective coatings use one or more thin layers of substances with refractive indices intermediate between that of silicon and that of air, causing destructive interference of the reflected light.

===Power curve=== thumb|A typical voltage/current curve for individual unshadowed solar panels. Maximum power point tracking ensures that as much power as possible is collected. {{Main|Solar inverter}}

In individual solar panels, if not enough current is taken, then power isn't maximised. If too much current is taken then the voltage collapses. The optimum current draw is roughly proportional to the amount of sunlight striking the panel. Solar panel capacity is specified by the MPP (maximum power point) value of solar panels in full sunlight.

===Inverters=== Solar inverters convert the direct current power provided by panels to alternating current power.

thumb|Power/Voltage-curve of a partially shaded PV module, with marked local and global MPP MPP (Maximum power point) of the solar panel consists of MPP voltage (V{{sub|mpp}}) and MPP current (I{{sub|mpp}}). Performing maximum power point tracking, a solar inverter samples the output (I-V curve) from the solar cell and applies the proper electrical load to obtain maximum power.

An alternating current solar panel has a small direct current to alternating current microinverter on the back and produces alternating current power with no external direct current connector. Alternating current modules are defined by Underwriters Laboratories as the smallest and most complete system for harvesting solar energy.<ref>UL1741 pp 17, Section 2.2</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2016 |title=Alternative Energy Equipment and Systems Marking Guide |url=https://www.ul.com/sites/default/files/2019-05/AlternativeEnergy_EquipmentandSystemsMarking_AG_2016.pdf |access-date=27 May 2025 |website=UL (Underwriters Laboratories)}}</ref>

Micro-inverters work independently to enable each panel to contribute its maximum possible output for a given amount of sunlight, but can be more expensive.<ref>{{cite web |title=Micro Inverters for Residential Solar Arrays |date=29 September 2015 |url=https://www.expertsure.com/uk/home/micro-inverters-for-residential-solar-arrays/ |access-date=10 May 2017}}</ref>

=== Solar panel interconnection === thumb|A connection example, a blocking diode is placed in series with each module string, whereas bypass diodes are placed in parallel with modules. Solar panel electrical interconnections are made of conductors that carry current and are sized according to the current rating and fault conditions; sometimes including in-line fuses.

Panels are typically connected in series of one or more panels to form strings to achieve a desired output voltage, and strings can be connected in parallel to provide the desired current (ampere) capability of the PV system.

In string connections the voltages of the modules add, but the current is determined by the lowest performing panel. This is known as the "Christmas light effect". In parallel connections the voltages will be the same, but the currents add. Arrays are connected up to meet the voltage requirements of the inverters and to not greatly exceed the current limits.

Blocking and bypass diodes may be incorporated within the module or used externally to deal with partial array shading, in order to maximize output. For series connections, bypass diodes are placed in parallel with modules to allow current to bypass shaded modules with a lower output voltage which would severely limit the current. For paralleled connections, a blocking diode may be placed in series with each module's string to prevent current flowing backwards through shaded strings thus short-circuiting other strings. If three or more strings are connected in parallel, fuses are generally included on each string to eliminate the possibility of diode failures overloading the panels and wiring and causing fires.

===Connectors=== Outdoor solar panels usually include MC4 connectors, automotive solar panels may include an auxiliary power outlet and/or USB adapter and indoor panels may have a microinverter.

{{Anchor|Efficiencies}}

== Efficiency == {{See also|Solar-cell efficiency}} [[File:NREL PV Module Record Efficiency Chart.png|thumb|upright=1.25|Reported timeline of champion solar module energy conversion efficiencies since 1988 (National Renewable Energy Laboratory)<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.nrel.gov/pv/assets/pdfs/champion-module-efficiencies-rev220401.pdf |title= Champion Photovoltaic Module Efficiency Plot |date=1 April 2022 |website=National Renewable Energy Laboratory |access-date=6 April 2022 }}</ref>]] Each module is rated by its DC output power under standard test conditions and hence the on field output power might vary. Power typically ranges from 100 to 365 Watts (W). The efficiency of a module determines the area of a module given the same rated output{{snd}} an 8% efficient 230 W module will have twice the area of a 16% efficient 230 W module. Some commercially available solar modules exceed 24% efficiency.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://mashable.com/2015/10/02/elon-musk-solarcity-new-solar-panel/ |title=Elon Musk and SolarCity unveil 'world's most efficient' solar panel |last=Ulanoff |first=Lance |date=2 October 2015 |website=Mashable |access-date=9 September 2018 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/05/160517121811.htm|title=Milestone in solar cell efficiency achieved |last=da Silva |first=Wilson |date= 17 May 2016|website=ScienceDaily |access-date=9 September 2018 |quote=A new solar cell configuration developed by engineers at the University of New South Wales has pushed sunlight-to-electricity conversion efficiency to 34.5% -- establishing a new world record for unfocused sunlight and nudging closer to the theoretical limits for such a device.}}</ref> As of 2025,<ref>{{Cite web |last=National Renewable Energy Laboratory |date=12 April 2024 |title=Photovoltaic Module Efficiency Records |url=https://www.nrel.gov/pv/module-efficiency |access-date=27 May 2025 |website=National Renewable Energy Laboratory |quote=These efficiencies have been verified by independent and internationally recognized testing laboratories such as NREL, AIST, JRC-ESTI, and Fraunhofer ISE.}}</ref> the best achieved sunlight conversion rate (solar module efficiency) is around 24.5% in new commercial products<ref>{{cite web|date=25 July 2014|title=SunPower e20 Module|url=http://us.sunpower.com/homes/products-services/solar-panels/e-series/|access-date=6 June 2014|archive-date=1 July 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140701144231/http://us.sunpower.com/homes/products-services/solar-panels/e-series/}}</ref> typically lower than the efficiencies of their cells in isolation. The most efficient mass-produced solar modules have power density values of up to 175 W/m<sup>2</sup> (16.22 W/ft<sup>2</sup>).<ref>{{cite web|title=HIT Photovoltaic Module|url=http://www.panasonic.com/business/pesna/includes/pdf/eco-construction-solution/HIT_Power_220A_Datasheet.pdf|access-date=25 November 2016|publisher=Sanyo / Panasonic}}</ref>

The current versus voltage curve of a module provides useful information about its electrical performance.<ref>{{cite journal| title=Experimental system for current–voltage curve measurement of photovoltaic modules under outdoor conditions|year=2011|last1=Piliougine|first1=M.|last2=Carretero|first2=J. |last3=Mora-López|first3=L.|last4=Sidrach-de-Cardona|first4=M.| journal=Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications|publisher=Progress in Photovoltaics | volume=19| issue=5| pages=591–602| doi=10.1002/pip.1073| s2cid=96904811}}</ref> Manufacturing processes often cause differences in the electrical parameters of different modules photovoltaic, even in cells of the same type. Therefore, only the experimental measurement of the I–V curve makes it possible to accurately establish the electrical parameters of a photovoltaic device. This measurement provides highly relevant information for the design, installation and maintenance of photovoltaic systems. Generally, the electrical parameters of photovoltaic modules are measured by indoor tests. However, outdoor testing has important advantages such as no expensive artificial light source required, no sample size limitation, and more homogeneous sample illumination.

Capacity factor of solar panels is limited primarily by geographic latitude and varies significantly depending on cloud cover, dust, day length and other factors. In the United Kingdom, seasonal capacity factor ranges from 2% (December) to 20% (July), with average annual capacity factor of 10–11%, while in Spain the value reaches 18%.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Mearns|first=Euan|date=20 October 2015|title=UK Solar PV Vital Statistics|url=http://euanmearns.com/uk-solar-pv-vital-statistics/|access-date=14 July 2021|website=Energy Matters|language=en-US}}</ref> Globally, capacity factor for utility-scale PV farms was 16.1% in 2019.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Solar PV capacity factor globally 2020|url=https://www.statista.com/statistics/799330/global-solar-pv-installation-cost-per-kilowatt/|access-date=14 July 2021|website=Statista|language=en}}</ref>{{Unreliable source?|date=January 2024}}

Overheating is the most important factor for the efficiency of the solar panel.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Elqady |first1=Hesham I. |last2=El-Shazly |first2=A. H. |last3=Elkady |first3=M. F. |date=31 October 2022 |title=Parametric study for optimizing double-layer microchannel heat sink for solar panel thermal management |journal=Scientific Reports |language=en |volume=12 |issue=1 |page=18278 |doi=10.1038/s41598-022-23061-8 |issn=2045-2322 |pmc=9622875 |pmid=36316376|bibcode=2022NatSR..1218278E }}</ref>

=== Radiation-dependent efficiency === Depending on construction, photovoltaic modules can produce electricity from a range of frequencies of light, but usually cannot cover the entire solar radiation range (specifically, ultraviolet, infrared and low or diffused light). Hence, much of the incident sunlight energy is wasted by solar modules, and they can give far higher efficiencies if illuminated with monochromatic light. Therefore, another design concept is to split the light into six to eight different wavelength ranges that will produce a different color of light, and direct the beams onto different cells tuned to those ranges.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.technologyreview.com/s/513671/ultra-efficient-solar-power/|archive-url=https://wayback.archive-it.org/all/20160220173016/https://www.technologyreview.com/s/513671/ultra-efficient-solar-power/|archive-date=20 February 2016|title=Managing Light To Increase Solar Efficiency|last=Orcutt|first=Mike|work=MIT Technology Review|access-date=14 March 2018|language=en}}</ref>

== Performance and degradation == thumb|upright=1.25 thumb|upright=1.25|This chart illustrates the effect of clouds on solar energy production.

Module performance is generally rated under standard test conditions: irradiance of 1,000 W/m<sup>2</sup>, solar spectrum of AM 1.5 and module temperature at 25&nbsp;°C.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Dunlop|first=James P.|title=Photovoltaic systems|date=2012|publisher=American Technical Publishers, Inc|others=National Joint Apprenticeship and Training Committee for the Electrical Industry|isbn=978-1-935941-05-7|edition=3rd|location=Orland Park, IL|oclc=828685287}}</ref> The actual voltage and current output of the module changes as lighting, temperature and load conditions change, so there is never one specific voltage at which the module operates. Performance varies depending on geographic location, time of day, the day of the year, amount of solar irradiance, direction and tilt of modules, cloud cover, shading, soiling, state of charge, and temperature. Performance of a module or panel can be measured at different time intervals with a direct current clamp meter or shunt and logged, graphed, or charted with a chart recorder or data logger.

For optimum performance, a solar panel string needs to be made of similar electrical voltage solar panels oriented in the same direction perpendicular to direct sunlight. Bypass diodes are used to optimize output by allowing continuous current flow by circumventing broken or shaded panels.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Bowden |first1=Stuart |last2=Honsberg |first2=Christiana |title=Bypass Diodes |url=https://www.pveducation.org/pvcdrom/modules-and-arrays/bypass-diodes |website=Photovoltaic Education |access-date=29 June 2021}}</ref>

Electrical characteristics include nominal power (P<sub>MAX</sub>, measured in W), open-circuit voltage (V<sub>OC</sub>), short-circuit current (I<sub>SC</sub>, measured in amperes), maximum power voltage (V<sub>MPP</sub>), maximum power current (I<sub>MPP</sub>), peak power, (watt-peak, W<sub>p</sub>), and module efficiency (%).

Open-circuit voltage or V<sub>OC</sub> is the maximum voltage the module can produce when not connected to an electrical circuit or system.<ref>{{cite web |title=Open-Circuit Voltage (Battery) |url=https://electricalschool.org/open-circuitvoltagebattery/ |website=Electrical School |date=13 June 2018 |access-date=30 June 2021}}</ref> V<sub>OC</sub> can be measured with a voltmeter directly on an illuminated module's terminals or on its disconnected cable.

The peak power rating, W<sub>p</sub>, is the maximum output under standard test conditions (not the maximum possible output). Typical modules, which could measure approximately {{convert|1|x|2|m|ft|sigfig=1}}, will be rated from as low as 75 W to as high as 600 W, depending on their efficiency. At the time of testing, the test modules are binned according to their test results, and a typical manufacturer might rate their modules in 5 W increments, and either rate them at +/- 3%, +/-5%, +3/-0% or +5/-0%.<ref>{{cite web|title=REC Alpha Black Series Factsheet|url=https://commercialsolaraustralia.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/DS-REC-Alpha-Black-Series-Rev-D-IEC-PRINT-EN.pdf}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.trinasolar.com/images/PDF/datasheets/us/TSM-PA14_US.pdf |title=TSM PC/PM14 Datasheet |access-date=4 June 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131029200512/http://www.trinasolar.com/images/PDF/datasheets/us/TSM-PA14_US.pdf |archive-date=29 October 2013 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.lubisolar.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Poly-260-275W.pdf |title=LBS Poly 260 275 Data sheet |access-date=9 January 2018 |archive-date=9 January 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190109155544/https://www.lubisolar.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Poly-260-275W.pdf }}</ref>

=== Influence of temperature ===

The performance of a photovoltaic (PV) module depends on the environmental conditions, mainly on the global incident irradiance G in the plane of the module. However, the temperature T of the p–n junction also influences the main electrical parameters: the short circuit current I<sub>SC</sub>, the open circuit voltage V<sub>OC</sub> and the maximum power P<sub>max</sub>. In general, it is known that V<sub>OC</sub> shows a significant inverse correlation with T, while for I<sub>SC</sub> this correlation is direct, but weaker, so that this increase does not compensate for the decrease in V<sub>OC</sub>. As a consequence, P<sub>max</sub> decreases when T increases. This correlation between the power output of a solar cell and the working temperature of its junction depends on the semiconductor material, and is due to the influence of T on the concentration, lifetime, and mobility of the intrinsic carriers, i.e., electrons and gaps. inside the photovoltaic cell.

Temperature sensitivity is usually described by temperature coefficients, each of which expresses the derivative of the parameter to which it refers with respect to the junction temperature. The values of these parameters can be found in any data sheet of the photovoltaic module; are the following:

- β: V<sub>OC</sub> variation coefficient with respect to T, given by ∂V<sub>OC</sub>/∂T.

- α: Coefficient of variation of I<sub>SC</sub> with respect to T, given by ∂I<sub>SC</sub>/∂T.

- δ: Coefficient of variation of P<sub>max</sub> with respect to T, given by ∂P<sub>max</sub>/∂T.

Techniques for estimating these coefficients from experimental data can be found in the literature<ref>{{cite journal|doi=10.1002/pip.3396|title =Temperature coefficients of degraded crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules at outdoor conditions|year=2021|last1=Piliougine|first1=M.|last2=Oukaja|first2=A.|last3=Sidrach-de-Cardona|first3=M.|last4= Spagnuolo|first4=G.|journal=Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications |publisher=Progress in Photovoltaics |volume=29 |issue=5 |pages=558–570 |s2cid=233976803 }}</ref>

Studies have shown that while high temperatures negatively impact efficiency, colder temperatures can improve solar panel performance due to reduced electrical resistance within the cells. However, winter conditions introduce additional challenges such as snow accumulation and reduced daylight hours, which can offset the efficiency benefits of lower temperatures. Solar panels are still capable of generating power in winter, but overall output may be lower due to limited sunlight exposure and potential obstructions.<ref>{{Citation |last1=Chitturi |first1=Sri Rama Phanindra |title=2018 IEEE International Energy Conference (ENERGYCON) |date=19 September 2018 |arxiv=1810.06692 |last2=Sharma |first2=Ekanki |last3=Elmenreich |first3=Wilfried|chapter=Efficiency of photovoltaic systems in mountainous areas |pages=1–6 |doi=10.1109/ENERGYCON.2018.8398766 |isbn=978-1-5386-3669-5 }}</ref>

===Degradation===

The ability of solar modules to withstand damage by rain, hail, heavy snow load, and cycles of heat and cold varies by manufacturer, although most solar panels on the U.S. market are UL listed, meaning they have gone through testing to withstand hail.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://energyinformative.org/solar-panels-weather/|title=Are Solar Panels Affected by Weather? |work=Energy Informative|access-date=14 March 2018|language=en-US}}</ref>

Potential-induced degradation (also called PID) is a potential-induced performance degradation in crystalline photovoltaic modules, caused by so-called stray currents.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.solarplaza.com/channels/asset-management/11674/potential-induced-degradation-combatting-phantom-menace/|title=Solarplaza Potential Induced Degradation: Combatting a Phantom Menace|website=solarplaza.com|language=en|access-date=4 September 2017}}</ref> This effect may cause power loss of up to 30%.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://eicero.com/what-is-pid|title=What is PID? – eicero|last=(www.inspire.cz)|first=INSPIRE CZ s.r.o.|website=eicero.com|language=en|access-date=4 September 2017|archive-date=4 September 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170904105326/https://eicero.com/what-is-pid}}</ref>

The power output of a photovoltaic (PV) device decreases over time due to exposure to solar radiation as well as other external conditions. The degradation index, defined as the annual percentage of output power loss, is a key factor in determining the long-term production of a photovoltaic plant. To estimate this degradation, the percentage of decrease associated with each of the electrical parameters is calculated. Individual degradation of a solar panel can negatively influence the performance of a complete string.<ref>{{Cite web |last1=Jordan |first1=Dirk C. |last2=Kurtz |first2=Sarah R. |date=1 November 2012 |title=Photovoltaic Degradation Rates — An Analytical Review |url=https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy12osti/51664.pdf |access-date=27 May 2025 |website=National Renewable Energy Laboratory}}</ref> Furthermore, not all solar panels in the same installation decrease their performance at exactly the same rate.

There are several studies dealing with the power degradation analysis of solar panels based on different photovoltaic technologies available in the literature. According to a recent study,<ref>{{cite journal |title=Analysis of the degradation of single-crystalline silicon modules after 21 years of operation |year=2021 |last1=Piliougine |first1=M. |last2=Oukaja |first2=A. |last3=Sánchez-Friera |first3=P. |last4=Petrone |first4=G. |last5=Sánchez-Pacheco |first5=J.F. |last6=Spagnuolo |first6=G. |last7=Sidrach-de-Cardona |first7=M. |journal=Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications |publisher=Progress in Photovoltaics |volume=29 |issue=8 |pages=907–919 |doi=10.1002/pip.3409 |s2cid=234831264 |hdl=10630/29057 |hdl-access=free}}</ref> the degradation of crystalline silicon solar panels is linear, between 0.8% and 1.0% per year.

On the other hand, if we analyze the performance of thin-film photovoltaic modules, an initial period of strong degradation is observed (which can last several months and even up to 2 years), followed by a later stage in which the degradation stabilizes, being then comparable to that of crystalline silicon.<ref>{{cite journal |title=Analysis of the degradation of amorphous silicon-based modules after 11 years of exposure by means of IEC60891:2021 procedure 3 |year=2022 |last1=Piliougine |first1=M. |last2=Oukaja |first2=A. |last3=Sidrach-de-Cardona |first3=M. |last4=Spagnuolo |first4=G. |journal=Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications |publisher=Progress in Photovoltaics |volume=30 |issue=10 |pages=1176–1187 |doi=10.1002/pip.3567 |hdl=10630/24064 |s2cid=248487635 |hdl-access=free}}</ref> Strong seasonal variations are also observed in such thin-film technologies because the influence of the solar spectrum is much greater.

Solar panels of amorphous silicon, micromorphic silicon or cadmium telluride, can have annual degradation rates for the first years of between 3% and 4%.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1016/j.renene.2022.05.063 |title=New model to study the outdoor degradation of thin-film photovoltaic modules |year=2022 |last1=Piliougine |first1=M. |last2=Sánchez-Friera |first2=P. |last3=Petrone |first3=G. |last4=Sánchez-Pacheco |first4=J.F. |last5=Spagnuolo |first5=G. |last6=Sidrach-de-Cardona |first6=M. |journal=Renewable Energy |volume=193 |pages=857–869 |bibcode=2022REne..193..857P |s2cid=248926054 |hdl=10630/29061 |hdl-access=free}}</ref>

Copper indium gallium selenide solar panels show lower degradation rates than crystalline silicon, even in early years.

== Mounting and tracking ==

{{main article|Photovoltaic mounting system|Solar tracker}}

[[File:EarthRangersCentre-ImageEnhancement.jpg|thumb|Solar modules mounted on solar trackers]]

=== Ground ===

Large utility-scale solar power plants frequently use ground-mounted photovoltaic systems. Their solar modules are held in place by racks or frames that are attached to ground-based mounting supports.<ref>{{cite web|website=SolarProfessional.com|url=http://solarprofessional.com/articles/products-equipment/racking/ground-mount-pv-racking-systems|title=Ground-Mount PV Racking Systems|date=March 2013|access-date=19 October 2014|archive-date=15 May 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130515164621/http://solarprofessional.com/articles/products-equipment/racking/ground-mount-pv-racking-systems}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|website=Massachusetts Department of Energy Resources | url=http://www.mass.gov/eea/docs/doer/renewables/solar/solar-pv-guide.pdf|title=Ground-Mounted Solar Photovoltaic Systems|date=December 2012}}</ref> Ground based mounting supports include:

* Pole mounts, which are driven directly into the ground or embedded in concrete. * Foundation mounts, such as concrete slabs or poured footings * Ballasted footing mounts, such as concrete or steel bases that use weight to secure the solar module system in position and do not require ground penetration. This type of mounting system is well suited for sites where excavation is not possible such as capped landfills and simplifies decommissioning or relocation of solar module systems.

{{multiple image | align = center | image1 = Solar array-3.jpg | width1 = 150 | alt1 = Solar array ground mounting | link1 = https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Solar_array-3.jpg#/media/File:Solar_array-3.jpg | caption1 = | image2 = Solar array-2.jpg | width2 = 181 | alt2 = Solar panels ground mounting | link2 = https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Solar_array-2.jpg#/media/File:Solar_array-2.jpg | caption2 = | footer = Solar array ground mounting }}

==== Vertical bifacial solar array ====

Vertical bifacial solar panels are oriented towards east and west rather than south, this allows them to utilize the sun's irradiance more efficiently in the morning and evening. In most cases this results in a slightly lower total output, but matches energy demand better than a south facing installation and helps reduce the duck curve problem. Applications include agrivoltaics, solar fencing, highway and railroad noise dampeners and barricades.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://undecidedmf.com/have-we-been-doing-solar-wrong-all-along/ | title=Have we been doing Solar wrong all along? - Undecided with Matt Ferrell | date=6 February 2024 | access-date=19 October 2025 | archive-date=16 May 2025 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250516021858/https://undecidedmf.com/have-we-been-doing-solar-wrong-all-along/ | url-status=dead }}</ref> Vertical bifacial solar panels are well suited for high-latitude locations, such as the Nordics, due to the low average solar altitude angle.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Jouttijärvi |first1=Sami |last2=Lobaccaro |first2=Gabriele |last3=Kamppinen |first3=Aleksi |last4=Miettunen |first4=Kati |date=1 June 2022 |title=Benefits of bifacial solar cells combined with low voltage power grids at high latitudes |journal=Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews |volume=161 |article-number=112354 |doi=10.1016/j.rser.2022.112354 |bibcode=2022RSERv.16112354J |issn=1364-0321|doi-access=free }}</ref>

<gallery class=center mode=nolines widths=180 heights=180> File:Agrivoltaic installation Foulum.jpg|Agrivoltaic vertical bifacial solar panels File:Vertical Bifacial vs South facing solar array.webp|Vertical Bifacial vs south facing solar array power output </gallery>

===Roof===

{{main|Rooftop solar power}}

thumb|upright=1.0|Installing residential rooftop solar panels

Roof-mounted solar power systems consist of solar modules held in place by racks or frames attached to roof-based mounting supports.<ref name=eco>{{cite web |url=http://www.ecodiy.org/california%20PV/californian%20photovoltaic%20best.htm |title=A Guide To Photovoltaic System Design And Installation |date=4 September 2001 |publisher=ecodiy.org |access-date=26 July 2011}}</ref> Roof-based mounting supports include: * Rail mounts, which are attached directly to the roof structure and may use additional rails for attaching the module racking or frames. * Ballasted footing mounts, such as concrete or steel bases that use weight to secure the panel system in position and do not require through penetration. This mounting method allows for decommissioning or relocation of solar panel systems with no adverse effect on the roof structure. *All wiring connecting adjacent solar modules to the energy harvesting equipment must be installed according to local electrical codes and should be run in a conduit appropriate for the climate conditions

====Solar canopy====

{{main|Solar canopy}}

[[File:Parking under Solar Canopy (52937580768).jpg|thumb|Solar canopy parking lot in New Haven at Hotel Marcel. There are EV level 2 chargers underneath the canopy and a 12-stall Tesla Supercharger behind.]]

Solar canopies are solar arrays which are installed on top of a traditional canopy. These canopies could be a parking lot canopy, carport, gazebo, Pergola, or patio cover.

There are many benefits, which include maximizing the space available in urban areas while also providing shade for cars. The energy produced can be used to create electric vehicle (EV) charging stations.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Why Putting Solar Canopies on Parking Lots Is a Smart Green Move |url=https://e360.yale.edu/features/putting-solar-panels-atop-parking-lots-a-green-energy-solution |access-date=29 September 2024 |website=Yale E360}}</ref>

=== Portable ===

Portable solar panels can ensure electric current, enough to charge devices (mobile, radio, ...) via USB-port or to charge a powerbank. Special features of portable solar panels include high flexibility, high durability & waterproof characteristics good for travel and camping.

===Tracking===

Solar trackers increase the energy produced per module at the cost of mechanical complexity and increased need for maintenance. They sense the direction of the Sun and tilt or rotate the modules as needed for maximum exposure to the light.<ref name=NREL_tracker>{{cite web |last=Shingleton |first=J |title=One-Axis Trackers – Improved Reliability, Durability, Performance, and Cost Reduction |url=http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy08osti/42769.pdf |publisher=National Renewable Energy Laboratory |access-date=30 December 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Mousazadeh |first=Hossain |title=A review of principle and sun-tracking methods for maximizing |url=http://xa.yimg.com/kq/groups/22199541/1797755549/name/A%252Breview%252Bof%252Bprinciple%252Band%252Bsun-tracking%252Bmethods%252Bfor%252Bmaximizing.pdf |work=Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 13 (2009) 1800–1818 |publisher=Elsevier |access-date=30 December 2012 |display-authors=etal}}</ref>

Alternatively, fixed racks can hold modules stationary throughout the day at a given tilt (zenith angle) and facing a given direction (azimuth angle). Tilt angles equivalent to an installation's latitude are common. Some systems may also adjust the tilt angle based on the time of year.<ref name=mounting_tilt>{{cite web |title=Optimum Tilt of Solar Panels |url=http://www.solarpaneltilt.com/ |publisher=MACS Lab |access-date=19 October 2014}}</ref>

On the other hand, east- and west-facing arrays (covering an east–west facing roof, for example) are commonly deployed. Even though such installations will not produce the maximum possible average power from the individual solar panels, the cost of the panels is now usually cheaper than the tracking mechanism and they can provide more economically valuable power during morning and evening peak demands than north or south facing systems.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/energy/solarpower/10996273/Most-solar-panels-are-facing-the-wrong-direction-say-scientists.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220111/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/energy/solarpower/10996273/Most-solar-panels-are-facing-the-wrong-direction-say-scientists.html |archive-date=11 January 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live |title= Most solar panels are facing the wrong direction, say scientists|last=Perry |first=Keith |date= 28 July 2014|work= The Daily Telegraph|access-date=9 September 2018 }}{{cbignore}}</ref>

== Maintenance ==

thumb|Local fire service attending a rooftop solar panel fire in South Tyrol. The fireman atop the roofline is holding a burnt-out panel.

Solar panel conversion efficiency, typically in the 20% range, is reduced by the accumulation of dust, grime, pollen, and other particulates on the solar panels, collectively referred to as soiling. "A dirty solar panel can reduce its power capabilities by up to 30% in high dust/pollen or desert areas", says Seamus Curran, associate professor of physics at the University of Houston and director of the Institute for NanoEnergy, which specializes in the design, engineering, and assembly of nanostructures.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.asme.org/engineering-topics/articles/energy/self-cleaning-solar-panels-maximize-efficiency |title=Self-Cleaning Solar Panels Maximize Efficiency |date=October 2012 |access-date=15 September 2014 |website=The American Society of Mechanical Engineers |publisher=ASME |last=Crawford |first=Mike}}</ref> The average soiling loss in the world in 2018 is estimated to be at least 3% – 4%.<ref name="Ilse">{{cite journal |last1=Ilse |first1=Klemens |last2=Micheli |first2=Leonardo |last3=Figgis |first3=Benjamin W. |last4=Lange |first4=Katja |last5=Dassler |first5=David |last6=Hanifi |first6=Hamed |last7=Wolfertstetter |first7=Fabian |last8=Naumann |first8=Volker |last9=Hagendorf |first9=Christian |last10=Gottschalg |first10=Ralph |last11=Bagdahn |first11=Jörg |year=2019 |title=Techno-Economic Assessment of Soiling Losses and Mitigation Strategies for Solar Power Generation |journal=Joule |volume=3 |issue=10 |pages=2303–2321 |doi=10.1016/j.joule.2019.08.019 | name-list-style=vanc |doi-access=free |bibcode=2019Joule...3.2303I |hdl=11573/1625631 |hdl-access=free }}</ref>

Paying to have solar panels cleaned is a good investment in many regions, as of 2019.<ref name="Ilse"/> However, in some regions, cleaning is not cost-effective. In California as of 2013 soiling-induced financial losses were rarely enough to warrant the cost of washing the panels. On average, panels in California lost a little less than 0.05% of their overall efficiency per day.<ref>{{cite web |url= http://ucsdnews.ucsd.edu/pressrelease/cleaning_solar_panels_often_not_worth_the_cost_engineers_at_uc_san_diego_fi |title=Cleaning Solar Panels Often Not Worth the Cost, Engineers at UC San Diego Find |date=August 2013 |access-date=31 May 2015 |website=UC San Diego News Center |last=Patringenaru |first=Ioana}}</ref>

There are also occupational hazards with solar panel installation and maintenance. A 2015–2018 study in the UK investigated 80 PV-related incidents of fire, with over 20 "serious fires" directly caused by PV installation, including 37 domestic buildings and 6 solar farms. In {{frac|1|3}} of the incidents a root cause was not established and in a majority of others was caused by poor installation, faulty product or design issues. The most frequent single element causing fires was the direct current isolators.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Fire incidents involving solar panels |url=https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/fire-incidents-involving-solar-panels |access-date=22 June 2021 |website=GOV.UK |date=19 March 2019 |language=en}}</ref>

A 2021 study by kWh Analytics found that, at a system level, the median annual degradation of PV installations was 1.09% for residential and 0.8% for non-residential. This was significantly more than the common industry assumption of 0.5% per year, which was taken from an estimate of panel-level degradation.<ref>{{Cite web |title=kWh Analytics Solar Risk Assessment 2021 |url=https://kwhanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/kWhAnalytics_SolarRiskAssessment21_06-08-21.pdf |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=8 June 2021 |title=Built solar assets are 'chronically underperforming' and modules degrading faster than expected, research finds |url=https://www.pv-tech.org/built-solar-assets-are-chronically-underperforming-and-modules-degrading-faster-than-expected-research-finds/ |access-date=22 June 2021 |website=PV Tech |language=en-US}}</ref> A 2021 module reliability study found an increasing trend in solar module failure rates with 30% of manufacturers experiencing safety failures related to junction boxes (growth from 20%) and 26% bill-of-materials failures (growth from 20%).<ref>{{Cite web |date=26 May 2021 |title=Solar module failure rates continue to rise as record number of manufacturers recognised in PVEL Module Reliability Scorecard |url=https://www.pv-tech.org/solar-module-failure-rates-continue-to-rise-as-record-number-of-manufacturers-recognised-in-pvel-module-reliability-scorecard/ |access-date=22 June 2021 |website=PV Tech |language=en-US}}</ref>

=== Cleaning ===

thumb|General cleaning of ground-based solar panels at the Shanta Gold mine in Tanzania thumb|Deeper level of cleaning with pressure washing of the car port solar panels at Googleplex, Mountain View, California

Cleaning methods for solar panels can be divided into 5 groups: manual tools, mechanized tools (such as tractor mounted brushes), installed hydraulic systems (such as sprinklers), installed robotic systems, and deployable robots. Manual cleaning tools are by far the most prevalent method of cleaning, most likely because of the low purchase cost. However, in a Saudi Arabian study done in 2014, it was found that "installed robotic systems, mechanized systems, and installed hydraulic systems are likely the three most promising technologies for use in cleaning solar panels".<ref>{{Cite book |last1=Alshehri |first1=Ali |last2=Parrott |first2=Brian |last3=Outa |first3=Ali |last4=Amer |first4=Ayman |last5=Abdellatif |first5=Fadl |last6=Trigui |first6=Hassane |last7=Carrasco |first7=Pablo |last8=Patel |first8=Sahejad |last9=Taie |first9=Ihsan |title=2014 Saudi Arabia Smart Grid Conference (SASG) |chapter=Dust mitigation in the desert: Cleaning mechanisms for solar panels in arid regions |date=December 2014 |pages=1–6 |doi=10.1109/SASG.2014.7274289 |isbn=978-1-4799-6158-0 |s2cid=23216963}}</ref>

Novel self-cleaning mechanisms for solar panels are being developed. For instance, in 2019 via wet-chemically etched nanowires and a hydrophobic coating on the surface water droplets could remove 98% of dust particles, which may be especially relevant for applications in the desert.<ref name="phys-20191209">{{cite news |author=American Associates, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev |date=9 December 2019 |title=Researchers develop new method to remove dust on solar panels |url=https://phys.org/news/2019-12-method-solar-panels.html |access-date=3 January 2020 |work=Ben-Gurion University of the Negev}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Heckenthaler |first1=Tabea |last2=Sadhujan |first2=Sumesh |last3=Morgenstern |first3=Yakov |last4=Natarajan |first4=Prakash |last5=Bashouti |first5=Muhammad |last6=Kaufman |first6=Yair |date=3 December 2019 |title=Self-Cleaning Mechanism: Why Nanotexture and Hydrophobicity Matter |journal=Langmuir |volume=35 |issue=48 |pages=15526–15534 |doi=10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b01874 |issn=0743-7463 |pmid=31469282 |s2cid=201673096}}</ref>

In March 2022, MIT researchers announced the development of a waterless cleaning system for solar panels and mirrors to address the issue of dust accumulation, which can reduce solar output by up to 30 percent in one month. This system utilizes electrostatic repulsion to detach dust particles from the panel's surface, eliminating the need for water or brushes. An electrical charge imparted to the dust particles by passing a simple electrode over the panel causes them to be repelled by a charge applied to the panel itself. The system can be automated using a basic electric motor and guide rails.<ref>{{Cite web |date=11 March 2022 |title=How to clean solar panels without water |url=https://news.mit.edu/2022/solar-panels-dust-magnets-0311 |access-date=18 February 2024 |website=MIT News {{!}} Massachusetts Institute of Technology |language=en}}</ref>

== Waste and recycling == There were 30 thousand tonnes of PV waste in 2021, and the annual amount was estimated by Bloomberg NEF to rise to more than 1 million tons by 2035 and more than 10 million by 2050.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Holger |first=Dieter |date=5 May 2022 |title=The Solar Boom Will Create Millions of Tons of Junk Panels |language=en-US |work=The Wall Street Journal |url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-solar-boom-will-create-millions-of-tons-of-junk-panels-11651658402 |access-date=14 October 2022 |issn=0099-9660}}</ref> For comparison, 750 million tons of fly ash waste was produced by coal power in 2022.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Eco-efficient cement could pave the way to a greener future: Rice U. scientists 'flash' toxic heavy metals out of fly ash, make stronger concrete |url=https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2023/03/230328145425.htm |access-date=17 May 2023 |website=ScienceDaily |language=en}}</ref> In the United States, around 90% of decommissioned solar panels end up in landfills as of 2023.<ref>{{Cite web |title=As Millions of Solar Panels Age Out, Recyclers Hope to Cash In |url=https://e360.yale.edu/features/solar-energy-panels-recycling |access-date=7 May 2023 |website=Yale E360 |language=en-US}}</ref> Most parts of a solar module can be recycled including up to 95% of certain semiconductor materials or the glass as well as large amounts of ferrous and non-ferrous metals.<ref>{{cite web|first=Lisa|last=Krueger |title=Overview of First Solar's Module Collection and Recycling Program|url=http://www.bnl.gov/pv/files/PRS_Agenda/2_Krueger_IEEE-Presentation-Final.pdf |access-date=17 March 2017|publisher=Brookhaven National Laboratory|page=23}}</ref> Some private companies and non-profit organizations take-back and recycle end-of-life modules.<ref name="Wambach">{{cite web|last=Wambach|first=K |title=A Voluntary Take Back Scheme and Industrial Recycling of Photovoltaic Modules|url=http://www.bnl.gov/pv/files/PRS_Agenda/3_4_PV-Module-RecyclingWambach.pdf |access-date=17 March 2017|publisher=Brookhaven National Laboratory|page=37}}</ref> EU law requires manufacturers to ensure their solar panels are recycled properly. Similar legislation is underway in Japan, India, and Australia.<ref>{{cite magazine|last=Stone|first=Maddie |date=22 August 2020|title=Solar Panels Are Starting to Die, Leaving Behind Toxic Trash|magazine=Wired|url=https://www.wired.com/story/solar-panels-are-starting-to-die-leaving-behind-toxic-trash/ |access-date=2 September 2020}}</ref> A 2023 Australian report said that there is a market for quality used panels and made recommendations for increasing reuse,<ref>{{Cite web |title=Reclaimed PV Panels Market Assessment Industry Report |url=https://www.circularpv.com.au/_files/ugd/10e921_d7a4fbb30adb4fd585b5d4784ccdc24b.pdf}}</ref>{{Rp|page=33}} but rules have not been implemented.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Mathur |first1=Deepika |last2=Gregory |first2=Robin |title=A solar panel recycling scheme would help reduce waste, but please repair and reuse first |url=https://theconversation.com/a-solar-panel-recycling-scheme-would-help-reduce-waste-but-please-repair-and-reuse-first-258806 |publisher=The Conversation |date=15 June 2025}}</ref>

Recycling possibilities depend on the kind of technology used in the modules: * Silicon based modules: aluminum frames and junction boxes are dismantled manually at the beginning of the process. The module is then crushed in a mill and the different fractions are separated – glass, plastics and metals.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.betterworldsolutions.eu/solar-panels-can-be-recycled/|title=Solar Panels can be recycled – BetterWorldSolutions – The Netherlands|last=Cynthia|first=Latunussa|date=9 October 2015|work=BetterWorldSolutions – The Netherlands|access-date=29 April 2018|language=en-US|archive-date=29 April 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180429093026/https://www.betterworldsolutions.eu/solar-panels-can-be-recycled/|url-status=dead}}</ref> It is possible to recover more than 80% of the incoming weight.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Latunussa |first1=Cynthia E.L. |last2=Ardente |first2=Fulvio |last3=Blengini |first3=Gian Andrea |last4=Mancini |first4=Lucia |title=Life Cycle Assessment of an innovative recycling process for crystalline silicon photovoltaic panels |journal=Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells |volume=156 |year=2016 |pages=101–11 |doi=10.1016/j.solmat.2016.03.020 |doi-access=free |bibcode=2016SEMSC.156..101L }}</ref> This process can be performed by flat glass recyclers, since the shape and composition of a PV module is similar to flat glass used in the building and automotive industry. The recovered glass, for example, is readily accepted by the glass foam and glass insulation industry. * Non-silicon based modules: they require specific recycling technologies such as the use of chemical baths in order to separate the different semiconductor materials.<ref>Wambach. 1999. p. 17</ref> For cadmium telluride modules, the recycling process begins by crushing the module and subsequently separating the different fractions. This recycling process is designed to recover up to 90% of the glass and 95% of the semiconductor materials contained.<ref>Krueger. 1999. p. 23</ref> Some commercial-scale recycling facilities have been created in recent years by private companies.<ref>Wambach. 1999. p. 23</ref>

Since 2010, there is an annual European conference bringing together manufacturers, recyclers and researchers to look at the future of PV module recycling.<ref>{{cite web |title=First Breakthrough in Solar Photovoltaic Module Recycling, Experts Say |publisher=European Photovoltaic Industry Association |url=http://www.unendlich-viel-energie.de/en/details/browse/11/article/253/first-breakthrough-in-solar-photovoltaic-module-recycling-experts-say.html |access-date=1 January 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130512230542/http://www.unendlich-viel-energie.de/en/details/browse/11/article/253/first-breakthrough-in-solar-photovoltaic-module-recycling-experts-say.html |archive-date=12 May 2013 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=3rd International Conference on PV Module Recycling |publisher=PV CYCLE |url=http://www.pvcycle.org/3rd-international-conference-on-pv-module-recycling/ |access-date=1 October 2012 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20121210042052/http://www.pvcycle.org/3rd-international-conference-on-pv-module-recycling/ |archive-date=10 December 2012 }}</ref>

== Production == {{see also|List of photovoltaics companies}} {| class="wikitable sortable floatright" style="text-align:right; margin-left:1.4em;" |+ Top producers of PV systems, by shipped capacity in gigawatts |- !scope="col"| Module producer !scope="col"| Shipments<br/> in 2019<br/> (GW)<ref>{{Cite web|date=5 August 2020|title=LONGi: Who Are They And Why Do We Use Them|url=https://pulsesolar.com.au/longi-who-are-they-and-why-do-we-use-them/|website=Pulse Solar|language=en-GB|access-date=5 August 2020|archive-date=5 March 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210305031224/https://pulsesolar.com.au/longi-who-are-they-and-why-do-we-use-them/}}</ref> |- !scope="row"| Jinko Solar | 14.2 |- !scope="row"| JA Solar | 10.3 |- !scope="row"| Trina Solar | 9.7 |- !scope="row"| LONGi Solar | 9.0 |- !scope="row"| Canadian Solar | 8.5 |- !scope="row"| Hanwha Q Cells | 7.3 |- !scope="row"| Risen Energy

| 7.0 |- !scope="row"| First Solar | 5.5 |- !scope="row"| GCL System | 4.8 |- !scope="row"| Shunfeng Photovoltaic | 4.0 |}

The production of PV systems has followed a classic learning curve effect, with significant cost reduction occurring alongside large rises in efficiency and production output.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/business-49344595|title=Can solar power shake up the energy market?|last=Harford|first=Tim|date=11 September 2019|access-date=24 October 2019|language=en-GB}}</ref>

With over 100% year-on-year growth in PV system installation, PV module makers dramatically increased their shipments of solar modules in 2019. They actively expanded their capacity and turned themselves into gigawatt GW players.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.helicalpower.com/|title=Solar PV Project Report {{pipe}} Helical Power|website=www.helicalpower.com|access-date=12 August 2022|archive-date=6 August 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190806121659/https://www.helicalpower.com/}}</ref> According to Pulse Solar, five of the top ten PV module companies in 2019 have experienced a rise in solar panel production by at least 25% compared to 2019.<ref name="pvmarketresearch1">{{cite web |title=LONGi: Who Are They And Why Do We Use Them |url=https://pulsesolar.com.au/longi-who-are-they-and-why-do-we-use-them |access-date=18 June 2020 |website=Pulse Solar |archive-date=5 March 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210305031224/https://pulsesolar.com.au/longi-who-are-they-and-why-do-we-use-them }}</ref>

The basis of producing most solar panels is mostly on the use of silicon cells. These silicon cells are typically 10–20% efficient<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.engineeringchallenges.org/cms/8996/9082.aspx|title=Grand Challenges Make Solar Energy Economical|website=engineeringchallenges.org}}</ref> at converting sunlight into electricity, with newer production models exceeding 22%.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.solarcity.com/newsroom/press/solarcity-unveils-world%E2%80%99s-most-efficient-rooftop-solar-panel-be-made-america |title=SolarCity Press Release |date=2 October 2015 |access-date=20 April 2017 |archive-date=2 October 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151002211024/http://www.solarcity.com/newsroom/press/solarcity-unveils-world%E2%80%99s-most-efficient-rooftop-solar-panel-be-made-america }}</ref>

In 2018, the world's top five solar module producers in terms of shipped capacity during the calendar year of 2018 were Jinko Solar, JA Solar, Trina Solar, Longi solar, and Canadian Solar.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.pv-tech.org/editors-blog/top-10-solar-module-suppliers-in-2018|title=Top 10 solar module suppliers in 2018|website=PV Tech|date=23 January 2019|language=en|access-date=24 October 2019}}</ref> === Environmental impact ===

The manufacture of PV panels depends on the use of toxic and reactive chemicals. These include cadmium telluride, copper indium selenide, cadmium gallium (di)selenide, copper indium gallium (di)selenide, hexafluoroethane, lead, and polyvinyl fluoride. Byproducts include silicon tetrachloride.<ref>{{cite web |last1=David |first1=Nguyen |title=Solar Panels Produce Tons of Toxic Waste—Literally |url=https://www.americanexperiment.org/solar-panels-produce-tons-of-toxic-waste-literally/ |website=American Experiment |date=5 January 2020 |access-date=14 September 2025}}</ref> Silicon dust ("kerf") is produced when the silicon wafers are sawn.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Patra |first1=Anirudh |url=https://www.ijstm.com/images/short_pdf/1415296203_P25-31.pdf |website=International Journal of Science, Technology and Management |access-date=14 September 2025}}</ref>

== Price == [[File:1975 – Price of solar panels as a function of cumulative installed capacity.svg|thumb |upright=1.25 |Swanson's law–stating that solar module prices have dropped about 20% for each doubling of installed capacity—defines the "learning rate" of solar photovoltaics.<ref name=SolarPVlearningCurve>{{cite web |title=Solar (photovoltaic) panel prices vs. cumulative capacity |url=https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/solar-pv-prices-vs-cumulative-capacity |website=OurWorldInData.org |archive-url=https://archive.today/20250124235542/https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/solar-pv-prices-vs-cumulative-capacity |archive-date=24 January 2025 |date=2024 |url-status=live }} OWID credits source data to: Nemet (2009); Farmer & Lafond (2016); International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA, 2024).</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/Is-there-really-a-Swansons-Law |title=Swanson's Law and Making US Solar Scale Like Germany |work=Greentech Media |date=24 November 2014}}</ref>]] {{See also|Grid parity}}

The price of solar electrical power has continued to fall so that in many countries it has become cheaper than fossil fuel electricity from the electricity grid since 2012, a phenomenon known as grid parity.<ref name=UN-Energy-2012/> With the rise of global awareness, institutions such as the IRS have adopted a tax credit format, refunding a portion of any solar panel array for private use.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Home Energy Tax Credits {{!}} Internal Revenue Service |url=https://www.irs.gov/credits-deductions/home-energy-tax-credits |access-date=4 December 2023 |website=www.irs.gov |language=en}}</ref> The price of a solar array only continues to fall.

Average pricing information divides in three pricing categories: those buying small quantities (modules of all sizes in the kilowatt range annually), mid-range buyers (typically up to 10 MWp annually), and large quantity buyers (self-explanatory—and with access to the lowest prices). Over the long term there is clearly a systematic reduction in the price of cells and modules. For example, in 2012 it was estimated that the quantity cost per watt was about US$0.60, which was 250 times lower than the cost in 1970 of US$150.<ref>{{cite web |author=ENF Ltd. |url=http://www.enfsolar.com/news/Small-Chinese-Solar-Manufacturers-Decimated-in-2012 |title=Small Chinese Solar Manufacturers Decimated in 2012 {{pipe}} Solar PV Business News {{pipe}} ENF Company Directory |publisher=Enfsolar.com |date=8 January 2013 |access-date=29 August 2013 |archive-date=30 December 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171230030211/https://www.enfsolar.com/news/Small-Chinese-Solar-Manufacturers-Decimated-in-2012 |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>{{cite book |url=http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=5954 |title=Harnessing Light |publisher=National Research Council |year=1997 |page=162|doi=10.17226/5954 |isbn=978-0-309-05991-6 }}</ref> A 2015 study shows price/kWh dropping by 10% per year since 1980, and predicts that solar could contribute 20% of total electricity consumption by 2030, whereas the International Energy Agency predicts 16% by 2050.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1016/j.respol.2015.11.001 |title=How predictable is technological progress? |journal=Research Policy |volume=45 |issue=3 |pages=647–65 |year=2016 |last1=Farmer |first1=J. Doyne |last2=Lafond |first2=François |arxiv=1502.05274 |s2cid=154564641 }}</ref>

Real-world energy production costs depend a great deal on local weather conditions. In a cloudy country such as the United Kingdom, the cost per produced kWh is higher than in sunnier countries like Spain. thumb|upright=1.25|Short term normalized cost comparisons demonstrating value of various electric generation technologies<ref name="MacDonald">{{cite journal|doi=10.1038/nclimate2921 |title=Future cost-competitive electricity systems and their impact on US {{CO2}} emissions |year=2016 |last1=MacDonald |first1=Alexander E. |last2=Clack |first2=Christopher T. M. |last3=Alexander |first3=Anneliese |last4=Dunbar |first4=Adam |last5=Wilczak |first5=James |last6=Xie |first6=Yuanfu |journal=Nature Climate Change |volume=6 |issue=5 |pages=526–531 |bibcode=2016NatCC...6..526M }}</ref>|alt= thumb|upright=1.25|Long term normalized cost comparisons demonstrating value of various electric generation technologies<ref name="MacDonald" />|alt=

Following to RMI, Balance-of-System (BoS) elements, this is, non-module cost of non-microinverter solar modules (as wiring, converters, racking systems and various components) make up about half of the total costs of installations.

For merchant solar power stations, where the electricity is being sold into the electricity transmission network, the cost of solar energy will need to match the wholesale electricity price. This point is sometimes called 'wholesale grid parity' or 'busbar parity'.<ref name=UN-Energy-2012>{{cite report |url=http://www.un-energy.org/stories/2498-re-considering-the-economics-of-photovoltaic-power |archive-url=http://arquivo.pt/wayback/20160516014242/http://www.un-energy.org/stories/2498-re-considering-the-economics-of-photovoltaic-power |archive-date=16 May 2016 |title=Re-considering the economics of photovoltaic power |author=Morgan Baziliana |work=UN-Energy |publisher=United Nations |date=17 May 2012 |access-date=20 November 2012 |display-authors=etal }}</ref>

== Standards == Standards generally used in photovoltaic modules: * IEC 61215 (crystalline silicon performance), 61646 (thin film performance) and 61730 (all modules, safety), 61853 (Photovoltaic module performance testing & energy rating) * ISO 9488 Solar energy—Vocabulary. * UL 1703 from Underwriters Laboratories * UL 1741 from Underwriters Laboratories * UL 2703 from Underwriters Laboratories * CE mark * Electrical Safety Tester (EST) Series (EST-460, EST-22V, EST-22H, EST-110).

== Applications ==

thumb|right|Solar panels on the roof of a bus shelter

{{main|Applications of photovoltaics}}

{{see also|List of solar-powered products}}

There are many practical applications for the use of solar panels or photovoltaics. It can first be used in agriculture as a power source for irrigation. In health care solar panels can be used to refrigerate medical supplies. It can also be used for infrastructure. PV modules are used in photovoltaic systems and include a large variety of electric devices.{{cn|date=August 2025}}

== Limitations ==

=== Impact on electricity network === With the increasing levels of rooftop photovoltaic systems, the energy flow becomes 2-way. When there is more local generation than consumption, electricity is exported to the grid. However, an electricity network traditionally is not designed to deal with the 2- way energy transfer. Therefore, some technical issues may occur. For example, in Queensland Australia, more than 30% of households used rooftop PV by the end of 2017. The duck curve appeared often for a lot of communities from 2015 onwards. An over-voltage issue may result as the electricity flows from PV households back to the network.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Miller |first1=Wendy |last2=Liu |first2=Aaron |last3=Amin |first3=Zakaria |last4=Wagner |first4=Andreas |title=Power Quality and Rooftop-Photovoltaic Households: An Examination of Measured Data at Point of Customer Connection |journal=Sustainability |volume=10 |issue=4 |year=2018 |page=1224 |doi=10.3390/su10041224 |url=https://publikationen.bibliothek.kit.edu/1000082198/7829299 |doi-access=free |bibcode=2018Sust...10.1224M }}</ref> There are solutions to manage the over voltage issue, such as regulating PV inverter power factor, new voltage and energy control equipment at the electricity distributor level, re-conducting the electricity wires, demand side management, etc. There are often limitations and costs related to these solutions.

For rooftop solar to be able to provide enough backup power during a power cut a battery is often also required.<ref>{{Cite web |last1=Paulos |first1=Bentham |last2=Barbose |first2=Galen |last3=Gorman |first3=Will |date=28 September 2022 |title=Could solar and batteries power your home when the electricity grid goes out? |url=http://theconversation.com/could-solar-and-batteries-power-your-home-when-the-electricity-grid-goes-out-191157 |access-date=16 September 2023 |website=The Conversation |language=en}}</ref>

== Quality assurance ==

{{see also|Photovoltaic module analysis techniques}}

Solar module quality assurance involves testing and evaluating solar cells and Solar Panels to ensure the quality requirements of them are met. Solar modules (or panels) are expected to have a long service life between 20 and 40 years.<ref>{{cite book|last=Dickie |first=P.M. |year=1999 |title=Regional Workshop on Solar Power Generation Using Photovoltaic Technology |publisher=DIANE publishing |page=120 |isbn=978-0-7881-8264-8 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=LsuwPTFHh8gC&dq=the+life+of+solar+panels&pg=PA120}}</ref> They should continually and reliably convey and deliver the power anticipated. Solar modules can be tested through a combination of physical tests, laboratory studies, and numerical analyses.<ref>{{cite book|last= Hough |first=T.P. |year=2006 |title=Trends in solar energy research |publisher=Nova |page=98 |isbn=978-1-59454-866-6 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=gpD-M_ZYMVMC&dq=how+to+test+solar+panel&pg=PA98}}</ref> Furthermore, solar modules need to be assessed throughout the different stages of their life cycle. Various companies such as Southern Research Energy & Environment, SGS Consumer Testing Services, TÜV Rheinland, Sinovoltaics, Clean Energy Associates (CEA), CSA Solar International and Enertis provide services in solar module quality assurance."The implementation of consistent traceable and stable manufacturing processes becomes mandatory to safeguard and ensure the quality of the PV Modules"<ref>{{Cite journal|first1=Vicente |last1=Parra |first2=Ruperto |last2=Gómez|date=September 2018|title=Implementing risk mitigation strategies through module factory and production inspections|url=https://www.pv-tech.org/technical-papers/implementing-risk-mitigation-strategies-through-module-factory-and-producti|journal=PV Tech|volume=16|pages=25–28}}</ref> Certification is carried out according to standards ANSI/UL1703,<ref>[https://www.intertek.com/building/standards/ul-1703/ UL 1703: Standard for Flat-Plate Photovoltaic Modules and Panels]</ref> IEC 17025,<ref>[https://webstore.iec.ch/en/publication/62135 ISO/IEC 17025]</ref> IEC 61215,<ref>[https://webstore.iec.ch/en/publication/75156 IEC 61215]</ref> IEC 61701,<ref>[https://webstore.iec.ch/en/publication/59588 IEC 61701]</ref> and IEC 61730-1/-2<ref>[https://webstore.iec.ch/en/publication/59803 IEC 61730-1</ref>

== See also == {{subject bar|auto=y|d=y|Renewable energy|Energy}} * Daisy chain (electrical engineering) * Digital modeling and fabrication * Domestic energy consumption * Grid-tied electrical system * Growth of photovoltaics * Solar charger * Solar cooker * Solar still

== References == {{Reflist}} ==Further reading== {{refbegin|30em}} *{{cite book |last1=Smets |first1=Arno H. M. |last2=Jäger |first2=Klaus |last3=Isabella |first3=Olindo |last4=van Swaaij |first4=René A. C. M. M. |last5=Zeman |first5=Miro |title=Solar Energy: The Physics and Engineering of Photovoltaic Conversion, Technologies and Systems |publisher=UIT Cambridge Ltd. |location=Cambridge, England |date=2016 |isbn=978-1-906860-32-5}} *{{cite book |last=Boxwell |first=Michael |title=Solar Electricity Handbook: A Simple, Practical Guide to Solar Energy: How to Design and Install Photovoltaic Solar Electric Systems |edition=2023 |publisher=Greenstream Publishing |location=Birmingham, United Kingdom |date=2023 |isbn=9781907670800|oclc=1372392885}} *{{cite book |last=Kalogirou |first=Soteris A. |title=Solar Energy Engineering: Processes and Systems |edition=3rd |publisher=Elsevier Science & Technology |location=San Diego |date=2023 |url=https://public.ebookcentral.proquest.com/choice/PublicFullRecord.aspx?p=30983366 |access-date=24 June 2025 |isbn=978-0-323-99351-7|oclc=1412622415}} *{{cite book |last=Mayfield |first=Ryan |title=Photovoltaic Design and Installation for Dummies |publisher=For Dummies |date=2022 |isbn=978-1-119-54435-7}} * {{cite book |last=Walker |first=Andy |title=Solar Energy: Technologies and Project Delivery for Buildings |publisher=Wiley |date=2023 |isbn=978-1-119-61861-4|oclc=823861049}} {{refend}}

{{Photovoltaics}} {{Roofs}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Solar Panel}} Category:Photovoltaics Panel