# Volume-Control Model

> Mediated Wiki article. Canonical URL: https://mediated.wiki/source/Volume-Control_Model
> Markdown URL: https://mediated.wiki/source/Volume-Control_Model.md
> Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volume-Control_Model
> Source revision: 1294902090
> License: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/)

Analytical framework

A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject. It may require cleanup to comply with Wikipedia's content policies, particularly neutral point of view. Please discuss further on the talk page. See our advice if the article is about you and read our scam warning in case someone asks for money to edit this article. (June 2025) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

The **Volume-Control Model**[1] is an analytical framework to describe the conditions that allow the transition of information into power. It requires controlling and regulating the connections between a large volume of information and people. This could be achieved by maintaining a balance between popular and personal information.

While popular information is relevant to a large audience, personal information is relevant to specific people. Ultimately, this is often practiced by network customization, which is tailoring information to specific groups based on common traits.

## Basic principles

Volume-Control Model

The volume-control model is a part of the broader idea of the [power-knowledge](/source/Power-knowledge) nexus. Lash[2] referred to the volume of information as an additive power, which is not only related to the amount of information people are exposed to, but also the number of links they get from others.

*Volume* is therefore associated with both the amount of information and the number of people who produce and receive it.

In this model *control* refers to the ability to effectively connect between the volume of information and the volume of people. Following the [Popular–Personal Theory](/source/Popular%E2%80%93personal_theory)[3] the first mechanism of control, *popularization*, is about focusing on the most popular information and offering it to a large number of people.

Popularization is a common strategy of global corporations such as [Google](/source/Google) (with its [PageRank](/source/PageRank) that prioritizes websites with many incoming links) and [Netflix](/source/Netflix) (with its algorithm to show the most viewed series and films), which enable them to exert greater control over their users.[4][5]

The second mechanism of control is information *[personalization](/source/Personalization)*. This is often achieved by tailoring information to the specific needs of each unique user, or groups of users, based on their demographic profile and tastes,[6] their search history and website visits,[7] and the information they produce, including web activity and mouse movement.[8]

## Applications

According to [Scott Galloway](/source/Scott_Galloway_(professor)),[9] the [Big Four tech companies](/source/Big_Tech) ([Google](/source/Google), [Meta](/source/Meta_Platforms), [Amazon](/source/Amazon_(company)) and [Apple](/source/Apple_Inc.)) have translated information to economic power by securing their exclusive access to a great volume of information and people. Their strategy was offering both popular and customized information to a growing number of users.

This model is being used to explain the [bias](/source/Search_engine#Search_engine_bias) of [Google Images](/source/Google_Images) search, in which the vast majority of results to the query "beauty" present mainly white young females.[1] While the unique search query "beauty" enables personalization of images, all of them are ultimately homogeneous and similar to each other.

Taken from beauty industry company websites and [fashion magazines](/source/Fashion_journalism), they represent the mainstream perception of beauty as a product. The trade-off between [popularization](/source/Popularization) and [personalization](/source/Personalization) techniques in the practice of large corporations such Netflix or Meta (with its [Instagram](/source/Instagram) platform) can similarly explain the seemingly different but largely homogeneous content they produce.

Another study[10] that applied the Volume-Control Model examined user engagement on [Twitter](/source/Twitter). It measured the [personalization](/source/Personalization) strategies using singular [pronouns](/source/Pronoun) such as "I", "you", "he" and "she", compared to [popularization](/source/Popularization) strategies using plural [pronouns](/source/Pronoun) such as "we" and "they". It was found that retweets are more likely to use [popularization](/source/Popularization) strategies as users address larger audiences with the plural [pronoun](/source/Pronoun) "we". Replies, on the other hand, are more likely to use [personalization](/source/Personalization) strategies as users address individuals using singular [pronouns](/source/Pronoun).

## References

1. ^ [***a***](#cite_ref-volume-control_1-0) [***b***](#cite_ref-volume-control_1-1) Segev, Elad (2019-09-05). "Volume and control: the transition from information to power". *Journal of Multicultural Discourses*. **14** (3): 240–257. [doi](/source/Doi_(identifier)):[10.1080/17447143.2019.1662028](https://doi.org/10.1080%2F17447143.2019.1662028). [ISSN](/source/ISSN_(identifier)) [1744-7143](https://search.worldcat.org/issn/1744-7143). [S2CID](/source/S2CID_(identifier)) [203088993](https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:203088993).

1. **[^](#cite_ref-2)** Lash, Scott. (2002). *Critique of information*. London: SAGE. [ISBN](/source/ISBN_(identifier)) [9781847876522](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/9781847876522). [OCLC](/source/OCLC_(identifier)) [654641948](https://search.worldcat.org/oclc/654641948).

1. **[^](#cite_ref-segev_3-0)** Segev, Elad (2025). [*Information and Power: Popular and Personal Storytelling in the Digital Age*](https://www.routledge.com/Information-and-Power-Popular-and-Personal-Storytelling-in-the-Digital-Age/Segev/p/book/9781032997209). New York: Routledge. [ISBN](/source/ISBN_(identifier)) [9781032997209](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/9781032997209).

1. **[^](#cite_ref-4)** Borghol, Youmna; Ardon, Sebastien; Carlsson, Niklas; Eager, Derek; Mahanti, Anirban (2012). "The untold story of the clones: Content-agnostic factors that impact YouTube video popularity". *Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining*. pp. 1186–1194. [arXiv](/source/ArXiv_(identifier)):[1311.6526](https://arxiv.org/abs/1311.6526). [doi](/source/Doi_(identifier)):[10.1145/2339530.2339717](https://doi.org/10.1145%2F2339530.2339717). [ISBN](/source/ISBN_(identifier)) [9781450314626](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/9781450314626). [S2CID](/source/S2CID_(identifier)) [5666648](https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:5666648).

1. **[^](#cite_ref-5)** Kruitbosch, Gijs; Nack, Frank (31 October 2008). "Broadcast yourself on YouTube: Really?". *Proceedings of the 3rd ACM international workshop on Human-centered computing*. pp. 7–10. [doi](/source/Doi_(identifier)):[10.1145/1462027.1462029](https://doi.org/10.1145%2F1462027.1462029). [ISBN](/source/ISBN_(identifier)) [978-1-60558-320-4](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/978-1-60558-320-4). [S2CID](/source/S2CID_(identifier)) [16264402](https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:16264402).

1. **[^](#cite_ref-6)** Gilmore, James; Joseph, Pine (1997). "The four faces of mass customization". *Harvard Business Review*. **75** (1): 91–101. [PMID](/source/PMID_(identifier)) [10174455](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10174455).

1. **[^](#cite_ref-7)** Segev, Elad (2010). *Google and the digital divide: the bias of online knowledge*. Oxford, U.K.: Chandos Pub. [ISBN](/source/ISBN_(identifier)) [9781843345657](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/9781843345657).

1. **[^](#cite_ref-8)** Baeza-Yates, Ricardo (23 May 2018). ["Bias on the web"](https://doi.org/10.1145%2F3209581). *Communications of the ACM*. **61** (6): 54–61. [doi](/source/Doi_(identifier)):[10.1145/3209581](https://doi.org/10.1145%2F3209581). [S2CID](/source/S2CID_(identifier)) [44111303](https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:44111303).

1. **[^](#cite_ref-9)** Galloway, Scott (2017). *The Four: The Hidden DNA of Amazon, Apple, Facebook, and Google*. Random House Large Print. [ISBN](/source/ISBN_(identifier)) [978-0525501220](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/978-0525501220).

1. **[^](#cite_ref-10)** Segev, Elad (April 2023). ["Sharing Feelings and User Engagement on Twitter: It's All About Me and You"](https://doi.org/10.1177%2F20563051231183430). *Social Media + Society*. **9** (2). [doi](/source/Doi_(identifier)):[10.1177/20563051231183430](https://doi.org/10.1177%2F20563051231183430).

---
Adapted from the Wikipedia article [Volume-Control Model](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volume-Control_Model) by Wikipedia contributors ([contributor history](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volume-Control_Model?action=history)). Available under [Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Changes may have been made.