# Pre-existence

> Mediated Wiki article. Canonical URL: https://mediated.wiki/source/Pre-existence
> Markdown URL: https://mediated.wiki/source/Pre-existence.md
> Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre-existence
> Source revision: 1344359458
> License: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/)

Belief that souls exist before conception

"Premortal life" redirects here. For the concept in the Latter Day Saint movement, see [Premortal life (Latter Day Saints)](/source/Premortal_life_(Latter_Day_Saints)).

This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Pre-existence" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (October 2022) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

*God resting after creation* – [Christ](/source/Christ) depicted as the creator of the world prior to his [incarnation](/source/Incarnation_(Christianity)) as [Jesus](/source/Jesus_in_Christianity),[1] [Byzantine mosaic](/source/Byzantine_mosaic) in [Monreale](/source/Monreale), [Sicily](/source/Sicily).

**Pre-existence**, **premortal existence**, **beforelife**, or **life before birth**, is the belief that each individual human [soul](/source/Soul_(spirit)) existed before mortal [conception](/source/Conception_(biology)), and at [some point before birth](/source/Ensoulment) enters or is placed into the body. Concepts of pre-existence can encompass either the belief that the soul came into existence at some time prior to conception or the belief that the soul is eternal. Alternative positions are [traducianism](/source/Traducianism) and [creationism](/source/Creationism_(soul)), which both hold that the individual human soul does not come into existence until conception or later. It is to be distinguished from [preformation](/source/Preformation), which is about physical existence and applies to all living things.[a]

## Ancient Greek thought

Further information: [Metempsychosis](/source/Metempsychosis)

[Plato](/source/Plato) believed in the pre-existence of the soul, which tied in with his [innatism](/source/Innatism). He thought that we are born with knowledge from a previous life that is subdued at birth and must be relearned. He saw all attainment of knowledge not as acquiring new information, but as remembering previously known information.[2]

## Baha'i Faith

This section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (March 2021) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

[Baháʼí literature](/source/Bah%C3%A1%CA%BC%C3%AD_literature) refers in a number of places to at least four key dimensions of pre-existence. Firstly, that the individual soul of a human being comes into being at the time of conception[3] and only thereafter is eternal; in other words, it is not pre-existent. Secondly, in distinction to the above, that the souls of the world's greatest spiritual teachers, the founders of world religions, are pre-existent. Thirdly, that God, a reality which human consciousness can not comprehend, is pre-existent, that is he exists prior to time and to his creation. Fourthly, that the relationship between God and the phenomenal or contingent world is one of emanation, as the rays of the sun are to the earth. In other words, the pre-existent world of God remains separate from and does not descend into his creation.[4]

## Buddhism

This section needs to be updated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information. (January 2022)

In [Buddhist cosmology](/source/Buddhist_cosmology), [saṃsāra](/source/Sa%E1%B9%83s%C4%81ra_(Buddhism)) is the cycle of life and death.[5] When a person dies in earth its human soul is born into the [Naraka](/source/Naraka_(Buddhism)) (underworld or the "purgatories" of the souls) and afterwards it is reborn on earth.[6] [Yama](/source/Yama_(Buddhism)), a [dharmapala](/source/Dharmapala) (wrathful god), is said to judge the dead and preside over the Narakas and the cycle.

A being is born into a Naraka as a direct result of its accumulated actions ([karma](/source/Karma_(Buddhism))) and resides there for a finite period of time (it varies from hundreds of millions to sextillions of years, but these periods are equivalent to hours or even years in earth time) until that karma has achieved its full result. After its karma is used up, it will be reborn in one of the higher worlds as the result of karma that had not yet ripened. The cycle is completed or finished when the soul reach the [Nirvana](/source/Nirvana).[7]

## Chinese mythology

In [Chinese mythology](/source/Chinese_mythology), the Naihe Bridge (奈何桥), also called the Bridge of Forgetfulness, connects earth with the [Diyu](/source/Diyu) ("earth prison"), that is the realm of the dead or purgatory. It is typically depicted as a subterranean maze with various levels and chambers, to which souls are taken after death to atone for the sins they committed when they were alive. The number of levels in Diyu it is said to be three, four, ten or even Eighteen "courts", each of which is ruled by a judge, collectively known as the Yama Kings. The god of the dead is [Yanluo Wang](/source/Yanluo_Wang), it oversees the kings of the courts. [Ox-Head and Horse-Face](/source/Ox-Head_and_Horse-Face) are the guardians of Diyu, and their role is the capture of human souls who have died and bring them before the courts of Hell, where they are rewarded or punished based on the actions performed in their lifetime. Legend has it that the dead who have committed serious sins in life cannot cross the Naihe Bridge and will be pushed into the "Blood River Pool" by Ox-Head and Horse-Face to suffer the torture of insects, ants and snakes, while the dead who have done good deeds will be able to cross the bridge very easily.[8]

The goddess of forgetfulness, [Meng Po](/source/Meng_Po), serves Meng Po Soup (孟婆汤) on the Naihe Bridge. This soup wipes the memory of the persons before they cross the bridge so they can reincarnate into their next life without the burdens of the previous life. She awaits the dead souls at the entrance of the 9th round (Fengdu). In some variations she is referred as [Lady Meng Jiang](/source/Lady_Meng_Jiang)[9]

## Christianity

Part of a series on Origenism Origen of Alexandria Thoughts Christian pacifism Asceticism Ransom theory of atonement Free will Pre-existence Subordinationism Universalism Apocatastasis Allegorical interpretation of the Bible Logos theology Aniconism Amillennialism Biblical criticism Allegorical interpretations of Genesis Hexapla Influences and precursors Plato Philo Aristotle Clement of Alexandria Clement of Rome Pseudo-Barnabas Pythagoras Hermas Origenist thinkers Tyrannius Rufinus Firmilian Arius Pamphilus of Caesarea Eusebius Didymus the Blind Evagrius of Pontus Christianity portal v t e

See also: [Pre-existence of Christ](/source/Pre-existence_of_Christ)

A concept of pre-existence was advanced by [Origen](/source/Origen), a second and third-century [Church Father](/source/Church_Fathers).[10] Origen believed that each human soul was created by God[11] at some time prior to conception. He wrote that already "one of [his] predecessors" had interpreted the Scripture to teach pre-existence, which seems to be a reference to the Jewish philosopher [Philo](/source/Philo).[12]

Some scholars, including [John Behr](/source/John_Behr) and [Marguerite Harl](/source/Marguerite_Harl), argue that this idea, condemned by the church, may have been taught by some later [Origenists](/source/Origenism), but that Origen himself was [orthodox](/source/Orthodoxy) in this regard and "never used the terms 'pre-existence of souls' or 'pre-existent intellects', and that Origen was talking about realities outside of time and not about any concept of temporality before our time.[13][14] Such orthodox understandings of Origen also show up in [Maximus the Confessor](/source/Maximus_the_Confessor) and in the idea of an [atemporal fall](/source/Atemporal_fall) as taught by Christian theologians [Sergei Bulgakov](/source/Sergei_Bulgakov) and [David Bentley Hart](/source/David_Bentley_Hart).[15][16][17][18]

Church Fathers [Tertullian](/source/Tertullian) and [Jerome](/source/Jerome) held to [traducianism](/source/Traducianism) and [creationism](/source/Creationism_(soul)), respectively, and pre-existence was condemned as heresy in the [Second Council of Constantinople](/source/Second_Council_of_Constantinople) in AD 553.[19]

Origen referenced Romans 9:11-14 as evidence for his position:

For the children being not yet born, neither having done any good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election might stand, not of works, but of him that calleth; It was said unto her, The elder shall serve the younger. As it is written, Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated. What shall we say then? Is there unrighteousness with God? God forbid.

— ["Romans 9: 11-14"](https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Romans%209%3A11-14&version=NIV).

Origen argued that God could not love Jacob and hate Esau until Jacob had done something worthy of love and Esau had done something worthy of hatred and so the passage means only that Jacob and Esau had not yet done good or evil *in this life* and their conduct *before* this life was the reason why Esau would serve Jacob.[20]

Origen also referenced Jeremiah 1:5:

Before I formed thee in the belly, I knew thee; and before thou camest forth out of the womb, I sanctified thee, and I ordained thee a prophet unto the nations.

He brought forth a question:

How could his soul and its images be formed along with his body, who, before he was created in the womb, is said to be known to God, and was sanctified by Him before his birth?[21]

Those who reject pre-existence, which would be every [Christian denomination](/source/Christian_denomination) that accepts the conclusions of the [Second Council of Constantinople](/source/Second_Council_of_Constantinople) (i.e., all [Catholics](/source/Catholics) and [Eastern Orthodox Christians](/source/Eastern_Orthodox_Christians) and many [Protestants](/source/Protestants)), simply see Jeremiah 1:5 as another passage about [God's foreknowledge](/source/Attributes_of_God_in_Christianity#Omniscience). This [Ecumenical Council](/source/Ecumenical_Council) explicitly stated "If anyone asserts the fabulous pre-existence of souls, and shall assert the monstrous restoration which follows from it: let him be [anathema](/source/Anathema)."[22]

### Latter Day Saint

Main article: [Premortal life (Latter Day Saints)](/source/Premortal_life_(Latter_Day_Saints))

See also: [Mormon cosmology § Pre-mortality](/source/Mormon_cosmology#Pre-mortality), and [Plan of salvation (Latter Day Saints) § Premortal life](/source/Plan_of_salvation_(Latter_Day_Saints)#Premortal_life)

The concept of **premortal life** is an early and fundamental doctrine of [Mormonism](/source/Mormonism).[23][24][25] In the faith's eponymous text, the [Book of Mormon](/source/Book_of_Mormon), published on March 26, 1830, the premortal spirit of Christ appears in human form and explains that individuals were created in the beginning in the image of Christ.[25][26] In 1833, early in the [Latter Day Saint movement](/source/Latter_Day_Saint_movement), its founder [Joseph Smith](/source/Joseph_Smith) taught that human souls are co-eternal with [God the Father](/source/God_in_Mormonism) just as [Jesus](/source/Jesus) is co-eternal with God the Father, "Man was also in the beginning with God. Intelligence, or the light of truth, was not created or made, neither indeed can be."[27][28]

## Hinduism

In the [Bhagavad Gita](/source/Bhagavad_Gita), considered by Hindus to be a most holy scripture, [Krishna](/source/Krishna) tells [Arjuna](/source/Arjuna); "Never was there a time when I did not exist, nor you, nor all these kings; nor in the future shall any of us cease to be."[29] Hinduism teaches [reincarnation](/source/Reincarnation#Hinduism). Consequently, everyone has pre-existed in another form.

## Islam

In Islam, all souls are believed to have been created in adult form before earthly life at the same time the God created the father of mankind, [Adam](/source/Adam_in_Islam). The [Qur'an](/source/Qur'an) recounts the story of when the descendants of Adam were brought forth before God to testify that God alone is the Lord of creation and so only God is worthy of worship[30] and so on the [Day of Judgement](/source/Day_of_Judgement), people cannot use the excuse that they worshipped others only because they were following the ways of their ancestors. Humans do not remember, as they are born with an undeveloped mind (leaving only an innate awareness that God exists and is one, known as the *[Fitra](/source/Fitra)*), and God decreed when every human would be born into the physical world.

## See also

- [Atemporal fall](/source/Atemporal_fall)

- [Afterlife](/source/Afterlife)

- [Bodhisattva](/source/Bodhisattva)

- [Gnosticism](/source/Gnosticism)

- *[Hypostasis of the Archons](/source/Hypostasis_of_the_Archons)*

- [Kabbalah](/source/Kabbalah)

- [Manichaeism](/source/Manichaeism)

- [Near-birth experience](/source/Near-birth_experience)

- [Origenism](/source/Origen#Views)

- [Scientology](/source/Scientology)

- [Spiritualism](/source/Spiritualism_(movement))

- [Western esotericism](/source/Western_esotericism#Philosophy)

- [Past life regression](/source/Past_life_regression)

- [Reincarnation](/source/Reincarnation)

## Notes

1. **[^](#cite_ref-2)** [Ancient Greek thought](/source/Ancient_Greek_philosophy) and [Islam](/source/Islam) affirm pre-existence, but it is generally denied in Christianity.

## References

1. **[^](#cite_ref-1)** George Ferguson, 1996 *Signs & symbols in Christian art* [ISBN](/source/ISBN_(identifier)) [0-19-501432-4](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/0-19-501432-4) page 92

1. **[^](#cite_ref-3)** Givens, Terryl L. (2012). [*When Souls Had Wings: Pre-Mortal Existence in Western Thought*](https://books.google.com/books?id=_ewVDAAAQBAJ). OUP USA. pp. 31–33. [ISBN](/source/ISBN_(identifier)) [978-0-19-991685-6](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/978-0-19-991685-6). Retrieved March 18, 2021.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-4)** Hornby, Helen. *Lights of Guidance* (1988 ed.). Baha’i Publishing Trust of India. p. 344.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-5)** ["The Hidden Nature of Life After Death"](https://bahaiteachings.org/hidden-nature-life-after-death/). *BahaiTeachings.org*. 2020-02-15. Retrieved 2023-01-26.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-6)** Trainor, Kevin (2004). [*Buddhism: The Illustrated Guide*](https://books.google.com/books?id=_PrloTKuAjwC). Oxford University Press. p. 58. [ISBN](/source/ISBN_(identifier)) [978-0-19-517398-7](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/978-0-19-517398-7). [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20200518042910/https://books.google.com/books?id=_PrloTKuAjwC) from the original on 2020-05-18. Retrieved 2016-09-25. Buddhism shares with Hinduism the doctrine of Samsara, whereby all beings pass through an unceasing cycle of birth, death and rebirth until they find a means of liberation from the cycle. However, Buddhism differs from Hinduism in rejecting the assertion that every human being possesses a changeless [soul](/source/Soul) which constitutes his or her ultimate identity, and which transmigrates from one incarnation to the next.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-7)** Braarvig, Jens (2009). "The Buddhist Hell: An Early Instance of the Idea?". *Numen*. **56** (2–3): 254–281.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-8)** Chad Meister (2009). *Introducing Philosophy of Religion*. Routledge. p. 25. [ISBN](/source/ISBN_(identifier)) [978-1-134-14179-1](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/978-1-134-14179-1) Buddhism: the soteriological goal is nirvana, liberation from the wheel of samsara and extinction of all desires, cravings and suffering.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-9)** Fang Zi (1 April 2020). [*Who is Geli Ou?*](https://books.google.com/books?id=T-DdDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT57). Linking Publishing Company. [ISBN](/source/ISBN_(identifier)) [9789570854701](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/9789570854701).

1. **[^](#cite_ref-10)** Attribution: Prose in this article was copied from the following pages: [Diyu](/source/Diyu) and [Meng Po](/source/Meng_Po) on January 16, 2021. Please see the history of that pages for attribution

1. **[^](#cite_ref-11)** [Medieval Sourcebook: Fifth Ecumenical Council: Constantinople II, 553](http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/basis/const2.html). [Fordham University](/source/Fordham_University), 1996.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-12)** Origen. [*De Principiis*](http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/text/origen122.html). Vol. I.V.3. let us inquire whether God, the creator and founder of all things, created certain of them holy and happy, so that they could admit no element at all of an opposite kind, and certain others so that they were made capable both of virtue and vice; or whether we are to suppose that He created some so as to be altogether incapable of virtue, and others again altogether incapable of wickedness, but with the power of abiding only in a state of happiness, and others again such as to be capable of either condition.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-13)** Chadwick, Henry (1953). *Origen: Contra Celsum*. Cambridge University Press. p. 307. [ISBN](/source/ISBN_(identifier)) [0-521-29576-9](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/0-521-29576-9). {{[cite book](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Cite_book)}}: ISBN / Date incompatibility ([help](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:CS1_errors#invalid_isbn_date))

1. **[^](#cite_ref-14)** Joseph T. Lienhard (December 2018). ["Orthodox Origen"](https://www.firstthings.com/article/2018/12/orthodox-origen). *[First Things](/source/First_Things)*. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20221225112550/https://www.firstthings.com/article/2018/12/orthodox-origen) from the original on 25 December 2022. Retrieved 12 February 2023.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-15)** [Origen of Alexandria](/source/Origen) (7 February 2018). "Introduction". *Origen: On First Principles (Oxford Early Christian Texts)*. Translated by [Behr, John](/source/John_Behr). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. [ISBN](/source/ISBN_(identifier)) [9780199684021](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/9780199684021).

1. **[^](#cite_ref-16)** [Hart, David Bentley](/source/David_Bentley_Hart) (31 August 2022). ["Sensus Plenior I: On gods and mortals"](https://davidbentleyhart.substack.com/p/sensus-plenior-i/comments). *Leaves in the Wind*. Retrieved 5 February 2023. First Reader (Aug 31, 2022): Should we favor the 'atemporal fall' view then? David Bentley Hart (Aug 31, 2022): Well, I certainly do. But the original Eden story isn't about the 'fall' at all, except in the vague sense that it was a mythic aetiology of life's miseries. Second Reader (Sep 2, 2022): Can you briefly describe what you understand or hold the 'atemporal fall' to be? Hart (Sep 2, 2022): No, not briefly. Second Reader (Sep 2, 2022): An extended response would, of course, be satisfactory also! But no, if you are aware of any particularly good reflections on it, I'd be grateful for a reference. Hart (Sep 2, 2022): Bulgakov, The Bride of the Lamb

1. **[^](#cite_ref-17)** Gottshall, Charles Andrew (1 May 2017). ["Sergius Bulgakov on Evolution and the Fall: A Sophiological Solution"](https://afkimel.wordpress.com/2017/05/01/sergius-bulgakov-on-evolution-and-the-fall-a-sophiological-solution/). *Eclectic Orthodoxy*. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20221202030046/https://afkimel.wordpress.com/2017/05/01/sergius-bulgakov-on-evolution-and-the-fall-a-sophiological-solution/) from the original on 2 December 2022. Retrieved 9 February 2023.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-18)** [Behr, John](/source/John_Behr) (15 January 2018). ["Origen and the Eschatological Creation of the Cosmos"](https://afkimel.wordpress.com/2018/01/15/origen-and-the-eschatological-creation-of-the-cosmos/). *Eclectic Orthodoxy*. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20230124131351/https://afkimel.wordpress.com/2018/01/15/origen-and-the-eschatological-creation-of-the-cosmos/) from the original on 24 January 2023. Retrieved 5 February 2023. Our beginning in this world and its time can only be thought of as a falling away from that eternal and heavenly reality, to which we are called.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-19)** Chenoweth, Mark (Summer 2022). ["The Redemption of Evolution: Maximus the Confessor, The Incarnation, and Modern Science"](https://issuu.com/jacobswell/docs/jacob_s_well_spring_2022_online_1_). *Jacob’s Well*. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20220814135608/https://issuu.com/jacobswell/docs/jacob_s_well_spring_2022_online_1_) from the original on 14 August 2022. Retrieved 5 February 2023.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-20)** ["The Anathemas Against Origen"](http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf214.xii.ix.html).

1. **[^](#cite_ref-21)** Origen. "Argument from the Prayer of Joseph, to Show That the Baptist May Have Been an Angel Who Became a Man". [*Commentary on John*](http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/text/origen-john2.html). Vol. Book II, Section 25. If, then, when they were not yet born, and had not done any-thing either good or evil, in order that God's purpose according to election might stand, not of works, but of him that calleth, if at such a period this was said, how if we do not go back to the works done before this life, can it be said that there is no unrighteousness with God when the elder serves the younger and is hated (by God) before he has done anything worthy of slavery or of hatred?

1. **[^](#cite_ref-22)** Origen. [*De Principiis*](http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/text/origen122.html). Vol. I.VII.4.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-23)** ["The Anathemas against Origen"](http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf214.xii.ix.html).

1. **[^](#cite_ref-PremortalSpirits_24-0)** Condie, Kent C. (Spring 2006). ["Premortal Spirits: Implications for Cloning, Abortion, Evolution, and Extinction"](https://www.dialoguejournal.com/articles/premortal-spirits-implications-for-cloning-abortion-evolution-and-extinction/). *[Dialogue](/source/Dialogue%3A_A_Journal_of_Mormon_Thought)*. **39** (1). [University of Illinois Press](/source/University_of_Illinois_Press): 47.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-Development_25-0)** [Ostler, Blake](/source/Blake_Ostler) (1982). ["The Idea of Pre-Existence in the Development of Mormon Thought"](https://dialoguejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/sbi/articles/Dialogue_V15N01_61.pdf) (PDF). *[Dialogue](/source/Dialogue%3A_A_Journal_of_Mormon_Thought)*. **15** (1). [University of Illinois Press](/source/University_of_Illinois_Press): 59, 73–74.

1. ^ [***a***](#cite_ref-Intelligences_26-0) [***b***](#cite_ref-Intelligences_26-1) Bowen, David R. Sr. (May 1999). [*Joseph Smith's Concept of Preexistent Intelligences: Development and Critique*](https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1049&context=masters) (Master of Religion thesis). Lynchburg, Virginia: [Liberty University](/source/Liberty_University). pp. 5–7.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-27)** [*Book of Mormon, Ether 3:15-16*](https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/scriptures/bofm/ether/3.15-16?lang=eng). Vol. Ether 3:15-16. 26 March 1830.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-28)** Ward, Ryan D. (2022-07-01). ["A Reflection on Joseph Smith's Restorationist Vision of Truth"](https://www.dialoguejournal.com/articles/a-reflection-on-joseph-smiths-restorationist-vision-of-truth/). *[Dialogue](/source/Dialogue%3A_A_Journal_of_Mormon_Thought)*. **55** (2): 94. [doi](/source/Doi_(identifier)):[10.5406/15549399.55.2.05](https://doi.org/10.5406%2F15549399.55.2.05). [ISSN](/source/ISSN_(identifier)) [0012-2157](https://search.worldcat.org/issn/0012-2157).

1. **[^](#cite_ref-29)** [*Doctrine and Covenants*](https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/scriptures/dc-testament/dc/93.29?lang=eng). Vol. 93:29. 6 May 1833.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-30)** "Chapter 2 Verse 12". [*Bhagavad-gītā As It Is*](http://vedabase.net/bg/2/12/en).

1. **[^](#cite_ref-31)** Quran [7:172](https://quran.com/7?startingVerse=172)

## External links

[Wikisource](/source/Wikisource) has the text of the [1911 *Encyclopædia Britannica*](/source/Encyclop%C3%A6dia_Britannica_Eleventh_Edition) article "[Pre-existence, Doctrine of](https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/1911_Encyclop%C3%A6dia_Britannica/Pre-existence,_Doctrine_of)".

- [Metempsychosis: From the *Catholic Encyclopedia*](http://www.catholicity.com/encyclopedia/m/metempsychosis.html)—*see* [CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA: Metempsychosis](http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/10234d.htm).

- [Origen of Alexandria (185-254 CE), *Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy*](http://www.iep.utm.edu/origen-of-alexandria/).

- ["Reincarnation as Taught by Early Christians"](http://www.theosophy-nw.org/theosnw/reincar/re-imo.htm), by I. M. Oderberg, from *Sunrise* magazine, May 1973, Copyright © 1973 by [Theosophical University Press](https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Theosophical_University_Press&action=edit&redlink=1).

- [The Fifth Ecumenical Council](http://kuriakon00.tripod.com/reincarnation/fifth_council.htm), from online site *Kuriakon: Infinity*, section "Reincarnation".

---
Adapted from the Wikipedia article [Pre-existence](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre-existence) by Wikipedia contributors ([contributor history](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre-existence?action=history)). Available under [Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Changes may have been made.