# Participatory media

> Mediated Wiki article. Canonical URL: https://mediated.wiki/source/Participatory_media
> Markdown URL: https://mediated.wiki/source/Participatory_media.md
> Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Participatory_media
> Source revision: 1339073274
> License: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/)

{{Short description|Communication media where the audience can play an active role}}
'''Participatory media''' is [communication media](/source/communication_media) where the [audience](/source/audience) can play an active role in the process of collecting, reporting, analyzing and disseminating content.<ref name="wemedia">Bowman, S., Willis, C. "[http://www.hypergene.net/wemedia/weblog.php We Media: How Audiences are Shaping the Future of News and Information.] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170731180139/http://www.hypergene.net/wemedia/weblog.php |date=2017-07-31 }}" 2003: The Media Center at the American Press Institute.</ref> [Citizen / participatory journalism](/source/Citizen_journalism), [citizen media](/source/citizen_media), [empowerment journalism](/source/empowerment_journalism) and [democratic media](/source/democratic_media) are related principles.

Participatory media includes [community media](/source/community_media), [blogs](/source/blogs), [wiki](/source/wiki)s, [RSS](/source/RSS_(file_format)), [tagging](/source/tag_(metadata)) and [social bookmarking](/source/social_bookmarking), music-photo-video sharing, [mashups](/source/Mashup_(music)), [podcast](/source/podcast)s, [participatory video](/source/participatory_video) projects and [videoblogs](/source/videoblogs). All together they can be described as "e-services, which involve end-users as active participants in the value creation process".<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://eipcm.org/research.html |title=How we work |access-date=2012-11-13 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091001194819/http://eipcm.org/research.html |archive-date=2009-10-01 |url-status=dead }}</ref> However, "active [...] uses of media are not exclusive to our times".<ref name="history_pm">Ekström, A., Jülich, S., Lundgren, F., Wisselgren, P. "History of Participatory Media". 2011: Taylor & Francis Group.</ref> "In the history of mediated communication we can find many variations of participatory practices. For instance, the initial phase of the [radio](/source/radio) knew many examples of non-professional broadcasters".<ref name="Carpentier">Carpentier, Nico. "Participation Is Not Enough: The Conditions of Possibility of Mediated Participatory Practices" 2009: European Journal of Communication 2009 24: 407-419.</ref>

[Marshall McLuhan](/source/Marshall_McLuhan) discussed the participatory potential of media already in the 1970s but in the era of digital and [social media](/source/social_media), the theory of [participatory culture](/source/participatory_culture) becomes even more acute as the borders between audiences and media producers blurred.<ref name="Jenkins">Jenkins, Henry. "Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide" 2006: New York University Press.</ref>

==Characteristics==
These distinctly different media share three common, interrelated characteristics:<ref name="Rheingold">{{cite book|last= Rheingold |first= Howard|chapter=Using Participatory Media and Public Voice to Encourage Civic Engagement|title=Civic Life Online: Learning How Digital Media Can Engage Youth|publisher= [Massachusetts Institute of Technology](/source/Massachusetts_Institute_of_Technology)|date=2007|isbn=9780262524827|chapter-url=https://www.issuelab.org/resources/881/881.pdf}}</ref>

* [Many-to-many](/source/Many-to-many) [media](/source/Media_(communication)) now make it possible for every person connected to the network to broadcast and receive [text](/source/Written_language), [image](/source/image)s, [audio](/source/sound), [video](/source/video), [software](/source/software), [data](/source/data), [discussion](/source/discussion)s, [transactions](/source/Transaction_processing), [computation](/source/computation)s, [tags](/source/tag_(metadata)), or [links](/source/hyperlink) to and from every other person. The asymmetry between broadcaster and audience that was dictated by the structure of pre-digital technologies dictated has changed radically. This is a technical-structural characteristic.
* Participatory media are [social media](/source/social_media) whose value and power derives from the active participation of [many people](/source/Internet_meme). This is a psychological and social characteristic. One example is [StumbleUpon](/source/StumbleUpon).
* [Social network](/source/Social_network)s, when amplified by information and [communication networks](/source/communication_networks), enable broader, faster, and lower cost coordination of activities. This is an economic and political characteristic.

Full-fledged participatory news sites include [NowPublic](/source/NowPublic), [OhmyNews](/source/OhmyNews), DigitalJournal.com, [On the Ground News Reports](/source/On_the_Ground_News_Reports) and [GroundReport](/source/GroundReport).

With participatory media, the boundaries between audiences and creators become blurred and often invisible. In the words of [David Sifry](/source/David_Sifry), the founder of [Technorati](/source/Technorati), a search engine for blogs, one-to-many "lectures" (i.e., from media companies to their audiences) are transformed into "conversations" among "the people formerly known as the audience". This changes the tone of public discussions. The mainstream media, says [David Weinberger](/source/David_Weinberger), a blogger, author and fellow at [Harvard University](/source/Harvard_University)'s [Berkman Center for Internet & Society](/source/Berkman_Center_for_Internet_%26_Society), "don't get how subversive it is to take institutions and turn them into conversations". That is because institutions are closed, assume a hierarchy and have trouble admitting fallibility, he says, whereas conversations are open-ended, assume equality and eagerly concede fallibility.<ref name="Kluth">{{cite news|last=Kluth|first=Andreas|title=Among the Audience|publisher=[Economist](/source/Economist)|url=http://www.economist.com/surveys/displaystory.cfm?story_id=6794156|date=20 April 2006}}</ref>

Some proposed that journalism can be more "[participatory](/source/participatory)" because the [World Wide Web](/source/World_Wide_Web) has evolved from "read-only" to "[read-write](/source/read%2Fwrite_culture)". In other words, in the past only a small proportion of people had the means (in terms of time, money, and skills) to create content that could reach large audiences. Now the gap between the resources and skills needed to consume online content versus the means necessary to produce it have narrowed significantly to the point that nearly anyone with a web-connected device can create media.<ref name="MacKinnon">{{cite web|last=MacKinnon|first=Rebecca|title=Blogging, Journalism and Credibility: The Future of Global Participatory Media|publisher=Seikai Shisosya|url=http://rconversation.blogs.com/MacKinnon_blogging_and_journalism_2007.pdf}}</ref> As [Dan Gillmor](/source/Dan_Gillmor), founder of the Center for Citizen Media declared in his 2004 book [We the Media](/source/We_the_Media), journalism is evolving from a lecture into a conversation.<ref name="Gilmor">{{cite book|last=Gilmor|first=Dan|title=We the Media|publisher=[O'Reilly](/source/O'Reilly_Media)}}</ref> He also points out that new interactive forms of media have blurred the distinction between producers of news and their audience. In fact, some view the term "audience" to be obsolete in the new world of interactive participatory media. New York University professor and blogger [Jay Rosen](/source/Jay_Rosen) refers to them as "the people formerly known as the audience."<ref name="Rosen">{{cite web|last=Rosen|first=Jay|title=Top Ten Ideas of '04: News Turns from a Lecture to a Conversation|publisher=Pressthink|url=http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2006/06/27/ppl_frmr.html|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100906032526/http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2006/06/27/ppl_frmr.html|archive-date=2010-09-06}}</ref> In "We Media", a treatise on participatory journalism, Shayne Bowman and Chris Willis suggest that the "audience" should be renamed "participants".<ref name="wemedia"/> One of the first projects encompassing participatory media prior to the advent of social media was The [September 11 Photo Project](/source/September_11_Photo_Project). The exhibit was a not-for-profit community based photo project in response to the [September 11 attacks](/source/September_11_attacks) and their aftermath. It provided a venue for the display of photographs accompanied by captions by anyone who wished to participate. The Project aimed to preserve a record of the spontaneous outdoor shrines that were being swept away by rain or wind or collected by the city for historical preservation.

Some even proposed that "all mass media should be abandoned", extending upon one of the four main arguments given by [Jerry Mander](/source/Jerry_Mander) in his case against television: Corporate domination of television used to mould humans for a commercial environment, and all mass media involve centralized power. Blogger Robin Good wrote, "With participatory media instead of mass media, governments and corporations would be far less able to control information and maintain their legitimacy... To bring about true participatory media (and society), it is also necessary to bring about participatory alternatives to present economic and political structures... In order for withdrawal from using the mass media to become more popular, participatory media must become more attractive: cheaper, more accessible, more fun, more relevant. In such an atmosphere, nonviolent action campaigns against the mass media and in support of participatory media become more feasible."<ref name="Good">{{cite web|last=Good |first=Robin|title=The Power Of Open Participatory Media And Why Mass Media Must Be Abandoned|publisher=blog|url=http://www.masternewmedia.org/news/2006/03/20/the_power_of_open_participatory.htm}}</ref>

Although 'participatory media' has been viewed uncritically by many writers, others, such as Daniel Palmer, have argued that media participation must also "be understood in relation to defining characteristics of contemporary capitalism – namely its user-focused, customised and individuated orientation."<ref name="Palmer">{{cite web|last=Palmer|first=Daniel|title=Participatory Media: Visual Culture in Real Time|publisher=University of Melbourne|url=http://dtl.unimelb.edu.au/R/V3S399QAFCVRQXAL239Q87YCD42LF7U2C51Q6FQB3XGDCXA3YR-01304?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=65808&local_base=GEN01&pds_handle=GUEST}}</ref>

==See also==
* [Citizen media](/source/Citizen_media)
* [Public-access television](/source/Public-access_television)
* [Public participation](/source/Public_participation)
* [Social media](/source/Social_media)

==References==
{{reflist}}

==External links==
* [http://www.forrester.com/Groundswell/ladder.html The SocialTechnographic Ladder]: A graphic tool developed by Forrester to indicate the six levels of participation among social media users.
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20110813015634/https://www.socialtext.net/medialiteracy/ Participatory Media Literacy]: A site developed by media theorist Howard Rheingold on the pedagogical implications and uses of participatory media.
* [https://stellar.mit.edu/S/course/4/sp08/4.381/index.html Intro to Online Participatory Media: Zones of Emergency - Networks, Tactics, Breakdown]: A public course taught by Amber Frid-Jimenez and Dan Van Roekel at MIT.
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20100213203059/http://mediacity.mit.edu/ Networked Cultures and Participatory Media: Media City]: A course taught by Amber Frid-Jimenez at MIT.
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20070712034008/https://courses.ischool.berkeley.edu/i296a-3/f06/wiki/index.php/Main_Page Participatory Media/Collective Action], Class taught by [Xiao Qiang](/source/Xiao_Qiang) and [Howard Rheingold](/source/Howard_Rheingold), School of Information, University of California at Berkeley.
* [http://openwebpublishing.wikispaces.com/ Webpublishing in Open Participatory Environments] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120506203441/http://openwebpublishing.wikispaces.com/ |date=2012-05-06 }}: a 6-week workshop given by Barbara Dieu, Patricia Glogowski, Graham Stanley, Nick Noakes and Scott Lockman for the Electronic Village Online 2007 Session.
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20090928094952/http://dekita.org/smielt/ Social Media in ELT]: a 6-week workshop given by Barbara Dieu, Rudolf Ammann, Illya Arnet_Clark, Patricia Glogowski, Jennifer Verschoor for the Electronic Village Online 2008 Session.
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20100421090539/http://accurapid.com/Journal/45global.htm Translation and Participatory Media: Experiences from Global Voices] article by Chris Salzberg.
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20110423230153/http://www.hi8us-south.co.uk/dvds-publications/ Inclusion Through Media]: First hand accounts and critical analysis of work across the [https://web.archive.org/web/20190114041656/http://www.inclusionthroughmedia.org/ Inclusion Through Media] programme edited by Tony Dowmunt, Mark Dunford and Nicole van Hemert.
Category:Participatory democracy
Category:Technology in society
Category:2000s neologisms
Category:Citizen media

---
Adapted from the Wikipedia article [Participatory media](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Participatory_media) by Wikipedia contributors ([contributor history](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Participatory_media?action=history)). Available under [Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Changes may have been made.
