# Olympus Generation

> Mediated Wiki article. Canonical URL: https://mediated.wiki/source/Olympus_Generation
> Markdown URL: https://mediated.wiki/source/Olympus_Generation.md
> Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olympus_Generation
> Source revision: 1342832249
> License: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/)

1890–1920 Costa Rican liberal intellectual community

Politics of Costa Rica Constitution Abortion law LGBT rights Executive President (list) Laura Fernandez Delgado Vice Presidents Francisco Gamboa Douglas Soto Legislature Legislative Assembly (History) President: Rodrigo Arias Sánchez Judiciary Supreme Court of Justice President: Fernando Cruz Castro Administrative divisions Provinces and comarcas Cantons Districts Local government Indigenous territories Elections Recent elections General: 2018 2022 2026 2007 CAFTA referendum Political parties Foreign relations Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Worship Minister: Rodolfo Solano Diplomatic missions of / in Costa Rica Passport Visa requirements Visa policy Costa Rica portal Other countries v t e

Part of a series on Liberalism Schools Classical Conservative Constitutional Cultural Economic Corporatist Market Neo New Green Manchester Muscular National Neoclassical Ordo Radical Religious Christian Islamic Jewish Secular Social Techno Ultra History Glorious Revolution Age of Enlightenment Atlantic Revolutions American Revolution French Revolution Revolutions of 1848 Vormärz Prague Spring Revolutions of 1989 Arab Spring Principles Consent of the governed Due process Economic globalization Equality Gender Legal Federalism Freedom Economic Market Trade Press Religion Speech Harm principle Internationalism Invisible hand Labor theory of property Laissez-faire Liberal democracy Liberty Negative Positive Limited government Market economy Natural monopoly Open society Permissive society Popular sovereignty Property Private Public Rights Civil and political Minority Natural and legal Property To bear arms Rule of law Secularism Separation of church and state Separation of powers Social contract Social justice Social services Welfare state Whig history Intellectuals Milton Locke Spinoza Montesquieu Voltaire Rousseau Smith Kant Turgot Burke Priestley Paine Beccaria Condorcet Bentham Korais De Gouges Wollstonecraft Staël Say Humboldt Constant Ricardo Guizot Lamennais List Bastiat Martineau Emerson Tocqueville Mill Spencer Arnold Acton Weber Hobhouse Croce Cassirer Mises Ortega Keynes Collingwood Čapek Hu Hayek Popper Aron Berlin Friedman Rawls Sen Nozick Kymlicka Badawi Klein Literature Tractatus Theologico-Politicus (1670) Two Treatises of Government (1690) The Spirit of Law (1748) The Social Contract (1762) The Wealth of Nations (1776) Rights of Man (1791) A Vindication of the Rights of Woman (1792) Democracy in America (1835) On Liberty (1859) The Protestant Ethic (1905) The Revolt of the Masses (1929) The General Theory (1936) The Road to Serfdom (1944) Human Action (1949) Capitalism and Freedom (1962) A Theory of Justice (1971) Anarchy, State, and Utopia (1974) Politicians Jefferson Kołłątaj Madison Artigas Bolívar Broglie Lamartine Macaulay Kossuth Deák Széchenyi Cobden Mazzini Juárez Lincoln Gladstone Cavour Sarmiento Mommsen Naoroji Itagaki Levski Kemal Deakin Milyukov Lloyd George Brătianu Venizelos Ståhlberg Gokhale Rathenau Madero Einaudi King Roosevelt Pearson Ohlin Kennedy Trudeau Jenkins Balcerowicz Verhofstadt Obama Macron Zelenskyy Organizations Africa Liberal Network Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe Party Arab Liberal Federation Council of Asian Liberals and Democrats European Democratic Party European Liberal Youth International Alliance of Libertarian Parties International Federation of Liberal Youth Liberal International Liberal Network for Latin America Liberal parties Liberal South East European Network Renew Europe By country Africa Egypt Nigeria Senegal South Africa Tunisia Zimbabwe Asia Armenia Bangladesh China Hong Kong Cyprus Georgia India Iran Israel Japan Philippines South Korea Taiwan Thailand Turkey Europe Albania Austria Belgium Bulgaria Croatia Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Hungary Italy Latvia Lithuania Luxembourg Moldova Montenegro Netherlands North Macedonia Norway Poland Portugal Romania Russia Serbia Slovakia Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland Ukraine United Kingdom Latin America Bolivia Brazil Chile Colombia Costa Rica Cuba Ecuador Honduras Mexico Nicaragua Panama Paraguay Peru Venezuela North America Canada United States Oceania Australia New Zealand Related topics Anarchism Anti-authoritarianism Anti-clericalism Anti-communism Anti-fascism Anti-socialism Capitalism Centrism Economic freedom Humanism Individualism Illiberal democracy Liberal autocracy Liberal conservatism Liberal feminism Liberal internationalism Liberal socialism Liberal Marxism Liberalism and nationalism Libertarianism Left Right Liberalism portal Politics portal v t e

The **Olympus Generation** (Generación del Olimpo), also called the *900 Generation*, is the name given in [Costa Rica](/source/Costa_Rica) to a group of intellectuals, teachers, historians, politicians and writers of liberal and [positivist](/source/Positivist) thought, whose ideas and philosophical, political, academic and cultural contributions were reflected in the sciences, arts, [literature](/source/Literature_of_Costa_Rica) and [politics](/source/Politics_of_Costa_Rica) between 1890 and 1920, this was the historical stage of Costa Rica where the [liberal state](/source/Liberal_democracy) is consolidated. Traditionally, they're known as the *Olympus generation* in reference to the [Olympian gods](/source/Olympian_gods) of [classical mythology](/source/Classical_mythology), because most of them belonged to an oligarchic elite with political and economic power obtained from the international coffee trade during the second half of the 19th century. This was the nickname given by their detractors due to the arrogance of many of its members.[1] The Olimpo generation played a leading role in the gestation of [culture](/source/Culture_of_Costa_Rica), [national identity](/source/National_identity) and the consolidation of the [Costa Rican State](/source/State_of_Costa_Rica).[2]

## Politics

See also: [Liberalism in Costa Rica](/source/Liberalism_in_Costa_Rica) and [First Costa Rican Republic](/source/First_Costa_Rican_Republic)

In the 1880s, a series of liberal reforms were promoted in Costa Rica, driven by a circle of intellectuals, scientists and politicians nicknamed "el Olimpo", due to the superb way in which these changes were carried out. This circle was formed during the dictatorship of General [Tomás Guardia Gutiérrez](/source/Tom%C3%A1s_Guardia_Guti%C3%A9rrez) (1870–1882) and his successors, [Próspero Fernández Oreamuno](/source/Pr%C3%B3spero_Fern%C3%A1ndez_Oreamuno) and [Bernardo Soto Alfaro](/source/Bernardo_Soto_Alfaro) (1882–1889).[3] The objectives of Olympus included the [secularization](/source/Secularization) and [Europeanization](/source/Europeanization) of the [bourgeoisie](/source/Bourgeoisie) and other urban groups, ascribed to the [capitalist](/source/Capitalist) and [positivist](/source/Positivist) ideology of progress. At the same time, they sought to "civilize" popular cultures, converting people from the [lower classes](/source/Lower_social_class) into literate citizens, identified with work and moral discipline, hygiene, science and patriotism. Aided by the expansion of public administration, The Olympus gave itself to the effort to modernize the country, spreading bourgeois values, stimulating capitalism and strengthening the State.[4]

The first phase of the modernization of the Costa Rican State occurred between 1884 and 1889, and reached three main achievements in regard to the cultural aspect:[3]

- the invention of the Costa Rican nation.

- the decisive impulse of popular literacy.

- the delimitation of the sphere of influence of the [Catholic Church](/source/Catholic_Church_in_Costa_Rica).

The formation of national identity revolved around the rescue of the events and figures of the [National Campaign of 1856–1857](/source/Filibuster_War). At the same time, there was an incorporation of the popular sectors in the political contests from the introduction of [direct suffrage](/source/Direct_suffrage), mainly between 1897 and 1913, with an increase in citizen participation registered in the electoral roll, which went from 39 to 80%.[3]

It was in this period that the construction of a large amount of national infrastructure destined for the service of the state took place: an [Archive](/source/National_Archives_of_Costa_Rica) (1881), a [Museum](/source/National_Museum_of_Costa_Rica) (1887), a [Library](https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=National_Library_of_Costa_Rica&action=edit&redlink=1) (1888) and a [Theater](/source/National_Theatre_of_Costa_Rica) (1897). There was also the develization of the main monuments of the country, dedicated to the National Campaign: the National Monument (1895) and the statue of [Juan Santamaría](/source/Juan_Santamar%C3%ADa) (1891).[3]

The intellectuality of Olympus decisively promoted education and public health. The state also promoted the professionalization of the police, inaugurated a modern penitentiary in San José, and strengthened its support for the monitoring of poor families, carried out by charitable organizations.[3]

## Literature

Main article: [Literature of Costa Rica](/source/Literature_of_Costa_Rica)

[Aquileo J. Echeverría](/source/Aquileo_J._Echeverr%C3%ADa)

[Carlos Gagini](/source/Carlos_Gagini)

Ricardo Fernández Guardia

While politicians were setting up the new Liberal State in the last two decades of the nineteenth century, a group of intellectuals consisting of teachers, historians and writers are responsible for developing a new Costa Rican official mythology, with its national history, culture and literature. The concern of the members of El Olimpo to build a national identity at the end of the 19th century led them to strive to produce a Costa Rican [national literature](/source/National_literature).[2] The production, importation and circulation of books and pamphlets suffers a qualitative change after 1880, with a substantial decrease in the proportion of official and devotional texts, while the number of scientific works, social essays and literary works increases. From 1890, texts of European fashion writers circulate in the country, through newspapers and cultural magazines that are consolidating. This is how the first books of national literature are printed, since during the Colony and almost all the nineteenth century, the literary production in the Costa Rican territory was unimportant. Towards the end of the 19th century, the only genre that had had a bit of development was the customs table.[2]

The first historical promotion of Costa Rican writers corresponds to the members of El Olimpo, whose authors have come to be considered as the classics of national literature. These writers were the first to discuss the possibilities or characteristics of literature, the first to publish books and literary magazines, to develop systematic models of literary representation of the national reality.[2]

The historical, literary and ideological role of these authors consisted of elaborating a model of national literature that corresponded to the [nationalist](/source/Costa_Rican_nationalism) and civilizing project that began under the sign of oligarchic liberalism. The authors of the Olimpo generation offer in their texts the image of a society in transition where the discourse of tradition and the discourse of [modernity](/source/Modernity) coexist without assimilating or completely excluding one another. The discourse of tradition is associated with the preservation of certain traditions and customs of almost ritual nature, appearing as an index of identity and harmony, legitimizing social order and conscience and moral integrity, although they may also appear as a sign of inertia, expiration and conservatism, which leads to decadence and the inability to adapt to modernity. The discourse of modernity, on the other hand, is associated with individualism, the growth of mercantile relations, the power of money, the dissolution of traditional ties: it can be synonymous with freedom and progress, but also with moral and social decomposition, debauchery, alienation, agent of ideas and exotic customs that produce loss of national identity.[2]

The image of the national reality of its writers is limited to the Central Valley of Costa Rica, habitat of the coffee oligarchy, and excludes the spaces of indigenous cultures, the Caribbean and the cattle and mining regions of the northeast of the country. In this way, it facilitates the oligarchical identification with European culture, strengthening the image of a country of racial and cultural homogeneity, under the pattern of a civilized western nation.6 However, his writings have ambivalence: the authors identify themselves the same as liberals, but in their texts they show distrust towards the social and moral consequences of bourgeois individualism, capitalist progress, market growth and the dissolution of traditional society. Costa Rican life is, in the texts of Olympus, a social world in trance, where traditions and national customs are yearned for, which are corroded by the values of capitalist modernity.[2] The maturity of the writers of Olympus should coexist with the introduction of [modernism](/source/Modernism), and coincide with the appearance of a second writers' promotion that will begin the questioning of the model imposed by Olympus: the generation of the *[Repertorio Americano](/source/Repertorio_Americano)*.

## Notable figures

- **Politicians**: [Tomás Guardia Gutiérrez](/source/Tom%C3%A1s_Guardia_Guti%C3%A9rrez), [Próspero Fernández Oreamuno](/source/Pr%C3%B3spero_Fern%C3%A1ndez_Oreamuno), [Bernardo Soto Alfaro](/source/Bernardo_Soto_Alfaro), [Cleto González Víquez](/source/Cleto_Gonz%C3%A1lez_V%C3%ADquez), [Ascensión Esquivel Ibarra](/source/Ascensi%C3%B3n_Esquivel_Ibarra), [Ricardo Jiménez Oreamuno](/source/Ricardo_Jim%C3%A9nez_Oreamuno) and [Julio Acosta García](/source/Julio_Acosta_Garc%C3%ADa).

- **Writers**: [Manuel de Jesús Jiménez Oreamuno](/source/Manuel_de_Jes%C3%BAs_Jim%C3%A9nez_Oreamuno), [Jenaro Cardona Valverde](https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jenaro_Cardona_Valverde&action=edit&redlink=1), [Pío Víquez](https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=P%C3%ADo_V%C3%ADquez&action=edit&redlink=1), [Carlos Gagini](/source/Carlos_Gagini), [Ricardo Fernández Guardia](https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ricardo_Fern%C3%A1ndez_Guardia&action=edit&redlink=1), [Manuel González Zeledón](/source/Manuel_Gonz%C3%A1lez_Zeled%C3%B3n), [Aquileo J. Echeverría](/source/Aquileo_J._Echeverr%C3%ADa), [Roberto Brenes Mesén](/source/Roberto_Brenes_Mes%C3%A9n), [Lisímaco Chavarría](https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lis%C3%ADmaco_Chavarr%C3%ADa&action=edit&redlink=1).

## References

1. **[^](#cite_ref-molina_1-0)** Molina, Iván (2001). ["Elecciones y democracia en Costa Rica, 1885–1913"](http://www.cedla.uva.nl/50_publications/pdf/revista/70RevistaEuropea/70_IvanMolina.pdf) (PDF). *European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies*. **70**: 41–57.

1. ^ [***a***](#cite_ref-quesada_2-0) [***b***](#cite_ref-quesada_2-1) [***c***](#cite_ref-quesada_2-2) [***d***](#cite_ref-quesada_2-3) [***e***](#cite_ref-quesada_2-4) [***f***](#cite_ref-quesada_2-5) Quesada Soto, Álvaro (2008). [*Breve historia de la literatura costarricense*](https://books.google.com/books?id=Y7cOAQAAMAAJ). Editorial Costa Rica. [ISBN](/source/ISBN_(identifier)) [9789977238937](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/9789977238937). Retrieved 24 December 2018.

1. ^ [***a***](#cite_ref-eumed_3-0) [***b***](#cite_ref-eumed_3-1) [***c***](#cite_ref-eumed_3-2) [***d***](#cite_ref-eumed_3-3) [***e***](#cite_ref-eumed_3-4) ["Costa Rica. El golpe de Tomás Guardia (1870) y la etapa liberal (1871– 1940)"](http://www.eumed.net/tesis-doctorales/alhc/35.htm). *EUMED*. Retrieved 22 December 2018.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-gonza_4-0)** González Chaves, Daniel (2014). ["Los partidos políticos en Costa Rica: un acercamiento histórico"](http://www.afehc-historia-centroamericana.org/?action=fi_aff&id=3777%23rfn13267194055584d6ad0a54a). *Revista Asociación para el Fomento de los Estudios Históricos en Centroamérica*.{{[cite journal](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Cite_journal)}}: CS1 maint: deprecated archival service ([link](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:CS1_maint:_deprecated_archival_service))

v t e Costa Rica articles San José (capital) History Pre-Columbian history New Granada Captaincy General (Guatemalan) Mexican rule Federal Republic of Central America Free State of Costa Rica First Costa Rican Republic Liberal State Civil War (1948) Reform State Geography Conservation Deforestation Earthquakes Islands Mountains National parks Rivers Volcanoes Water resources Waterfalls Wildlife World Heritage Sites Politics Administrative divisions Provinces Cantons Districts Elections Foreign relations International rankings Legislative Assembly Deputies History Human rights LGBT Mayors Military Political parties President list Public finances Supreme Court Presidents Economy Agriculture Colón (currency) Telecommunications Tourism Ecotourism Transport Unions Society Demographics Education Ethnic groups Health Languages Religion Squatting Water supply and sanitation Culture Anthem Architecture Cinema Coat of arms Cuisine Flag Literature Media Music Public holidays Sport Outline Category Portal

v t e Liberalism in Latin America and the Caribbean Caribbean Antigua and Barbuda Aruba Bahamas Barbados Cuba Curaçao Dominica Dominican Republic Grenada Haiti Jamaica Puerto Rico Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Sint Maarten Trinidad and Tobago Central America Belize Costa Rica El Salvador Guatemala Honduras Nicaragua Panama North America Mexico South America Argentina Bolivia Brazil Chile Colombia Ecuador French Guiana Guyana Paraguay Peru Suriname Uruguay Venezuela Dependencies not included. Semi-autonomous territories are in italics.

v t e Liberalism in North America Sovereign states Antigua and Barbuda Bahamas Barbados Belize Canada Costa Rica Cuba Dominica Dominican Republic El Salvador Grenada Guatemala Haiti Honduras Jamaica Mexico Nicaragua Panama Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Trinidad and Tobago United States Dependencies and other territories Anguilla Aruba Bermuda Bonaire British Virgin Islands Cayman Islands Curaçao Greenland Guadeloupe Martinique Montserrat Puerto Rico Saint Barthélemy Saint Martin Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saba Sint Eustatius Sint Maarten Turks and Caicos Islands United States Virgin Islands

---
Adapted from the Wikipedia article [Olympus Generation](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olympus_Generation) by Wikipedia contributors ([contributor history](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olympus_Generation?action=history)). Available under [Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Changes may have been made.
