# Old English grammar

> Mediated Wiki article. Canonical URL: https://mediated.wiki/source/Old_English_grammar
> Markdown URL: https://mediated.wiki/source/Old_English_grammar.md
> Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_English_grammar
> Source revision: 1355027149
> License: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/)

Grammatical features of Old English

This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages) This article needs more citations. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Old English grammar" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (October 2011) (Learn how and when to remove this message) This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. The specific problem is: Lot of unencyclopedic language and tone. Contractions like "they're" should be expanded in full as well. Please help improve this article if you can. (February 2021) (Learn how and when to remove this message) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Part of a series on Old English Dialects Kentish Mercian Northumbrian West Saxon Use Orthography (Runic alphabet, Latin alphabet) Grammar Phonology Phonological history Literature Beowulf Anglo-Saxon Chronicle Cædmon's Hymn History Development of Old English Influences Proto-Germanic Latin Norse Brittonic Legacy Middle English Early Modern English Modern English Scots v t e

The **grammar of Old English** differs greatly from [Modern English](/source/Modern_English), predominantly being much more [inflected](/source/Inflection). As a Germanic language, [Old English](/source/Old_English) has a [morphological](/source/Morphology_(linguistics)) system similar to that of the [Proto-Germanic](/source/Proto-Germanic) reconstruction, retaining many of the inflections thought to have been common in [Proto-Indo-European](/source/Proto-Indo-European_language) and also including constructions characteristic of the Germanic daughter languages such as the [umlaut](/source/Germanic_umlaut).[1]

Among living languages, Old English [morphology](/source/Morphology_(linguistics)) most closely resembles that of modern [Icelandic](/source/Icelandic_language), which is among the most conservative of the [Germanic languages](/source/Germanic_languages). To a lesser extent, it resembles modern [German](/source/German_language).

[Nouns](/source/Noun), [pronouns](/source/Pronoun), [adjectives](/source/Adjective) and [determiners](/source/Determiner) were fully [inflected](/source/Inflection), with four [grammatical cases](/source/Grammatical_case) ([nominative](/source/Nominative), [accusative](/source/Accusative), [genitive](/source/Genitive), [dative](/source/Dative_case)), and a vestigial [instrumental](/source/Instrumental_case),[2] two [grammatical numbers](/source/Grammatical_number) ([singular](/source/Singular_number) and [plural](/source/Plural)) and three [grammatical genders](/source/Grammatical_gender) (masculine, feminine, and neuter). First and second-person [personal pronouns](/source/Personal_pronoun) also had [dual forms](/source/Dual_(grammatical_number)) for referring to groups of two people, in addition to the usual singular and plural forms.[3] The instrumental case was somewhat rare and occurred only in the masculine and neuter singular. It was often replaced by the [dative](/source/Dative_case). [Adjectives](/source/Adjective), [pronouns](/source/Pronoun) and (sometimes) [participles](/source/Participle) agreed with their corresponding nouns in [case](/source/Grammatical_case), [number](/source/Grammatical_number) and gender. Finite [verbs](/source/Verb) agreed with their subjects in person and number.

Nouns came in numerous [declensions](/source/Declension) (with many parallels in [Latin](/source/Latin), [Ancient Greek](/source/Ancient_Greek) and [Sanskrit](/source/Sanskrit)). Verbs were classified into ten primary conjugation classes seven strong and three weak each with numerous subtypes, alongside several smaller conjugation groups and a few irregular verbs. The main difference from other ancient Indo-European languages, such as Latin, is that verbs could be conjugated in only two tenses (compared to the six "tenses", really tense/aspect combinations, of Latin), and the absence of a [synthetic passive voice](/source/Passive_voice), which still existed in [Gothic](/source/Gothic_language).

## Nouns

Old English nouns are grouped by [grammatical gender](/source/Grammatical_gender), and [inflect](/source/Inflection) based on [case](/source/Grammatical_case) and [number](/source/Grammatical_number).

### Gender

Old English retains all three genders of [Proto-Indo-European](/source/Proto-Indo-European_language): masculine, feminine, and neuter.

Each noun belongs to one of the three genders, while [adjectives](/source/Adjective) and [determiners](/source/Determiner) take different forms depending on the gender of the noun they describe. The word for "the" or "that" is *sē* with a masculine noun, *sēo* with a feminine noun, and *þæt (which sounds like “that”)* with a neuter noun. Adjectives change endings: for instance, since *hring* ("ring") is masculine and *cuppe* ("cup") is feminine, a golden ring is *gylden hring*, while a golden cup is *gylden**u** cuppe*.

In Old English the words for "he" (*hē*) and "she" (*hēo*) also mean "it". *Hē* refers back to masculine nouns, *hēo* to feminine nouns, reserving the neuter pronoun *hit* for grammatically neuter nouns. That means even inanimate objects are frequently called "he" or "she".[4] See the following sentence, with the masculine noun *snāw*:

Old English Mē līcaþ sē snāw for þon þe hē dēþ þā burg stille. Literal gloss Me liketh the snow for that he doth the borough still. Translation I like the snow because it makes the city quiet.

Compare this parallel sentence, where the neuter noun *fȳr* (OE equivalent of NE *fire*) is referred to with *hit* (OE equivalent of neuter singular nominative NE *it*):

Old English Mē līcaþ þæt fȳr for þon þe hit dēþ þā burg hlūde. Translation I like the fire because it makes the city loud.

Only a few nouns referring to people have a grammatical gender that does not match their natural gender, as in the neuter word *mæġden* ("girl"). In such cases, [adjectives](/source/Adjective) and [determiners](/source/Determiner) follow grammatical gender, but [pronouns](/source/Pronoun) follow natural gender: *Þæt mæġden sēo þǣr stent, canst þū hīe?* ("The [neuter] girl who [feminine] is standing there, do you know her?").[5]

When two nouns have different genders, [adjectives](/source/Adjective) and [determiners](/source/Determiner) that refer to them together are inflected neuter: *Hlīsa and spēd bēoþ twieċġu* ("Fame [masculine] and success [feminine] are double-edged [neuter plural]").[6]

#### Gender assignment

In Old English (and [Indo-European](/source/Indo-European) languages generally), each noun's gender derives from [morphophonology](/source/Morphophonology) rather than directly from [semantics](/source/Semantics). In other words, the gender of a noun derives as much or more from its structural form than any properties of the [referent](/source/Referent).

The gender of a given Old English noun is partly predictable, based on a combination of semantic and historical morphophonological grounds. What follows are some general principles in assigning noun gender in Old English.

In general, a thing that has biological sex will have that same gender; masculine *fæder* ("father") and feminine *mōdor* ("mother"), masculine *cyning* ("king") and feminine *cwēn* ("queen"), masculine *munuc* ("monk") and feminine *nunne* ("nun"), etc. The three major exceptions are neuter *wīf* ("woman", "wife") and *mæġden* ("girl"), and masculine *wīfmann* ("woman").

Animal names that refer only to males are masculine (e.g. *hana* "rooster", *henġest* "stallion", *eofor* "boar", *fearr* "bull", *ramm* "ram", and *bucc* "buck"), and animal names that refer only to females are feminine (e.g. *henn* "hen", *mīere* "mare", *sugu* "sow", *cū* "cow", *eowu* "ewe", and *dā* "doe"). The only exception is *drān* ("drone"), which is feminine even though it refers to [male bees](/source/Drone_(bee)).

*General* names for animals (of unspecified sex) could be of any gender: for example, *ūr* ("aurochs") is masculine, *fifalde* ("butterfly") is feminine, and *swīn* ("pig") is neuter.

If a noun could refer to both males *and* females, it was usually masculine. Hence *frēond* ("friend") and *fēond* ("enemy") were masculine, along with many other examples such as *lufiend* ("lover"), *bæcere* ("baker"), *hālga* ("saint"), *sċop* ("poet"), *cuma* ("guest"), *mǣġ* ("relative"), *cristen* ("Christian"), *hǣðen* ("heathen"), *āngenġa* ("loner"), *selfǣta* ("cannibal"), *hlēapere* ("dancer"), and *sangere* ("singer"). The main exceptions are the two words for "child", *ċild* and *bearn*, which are both neuter.

It is not easy to predict the gender of a noun that refers to a thing without biological sex, such as neuter *seax* ("knife"), feminine *gafol* ("fork"), and masculine *cucler* ("spoon").[7] The gender of nouns with inanimate referents is usually determined by historical morphophonological principles:

- Nouns ending in *-a* are almost all masculine. The exceptions are a small number of learned borrowings from Latin, such as *Italia* ("Italy") and *discipula* ("[female] disciple").

- Compound words always take the gender of the last part of the compound. That is why *wīfmann* ("woman") is masculine, even though it means "woman": it is a compound of *wīf* ("woman") plus the masculine noun *mann* ("person").

- Similarly, if a noun ends in a suffix, the suffix determines its gender. Nouns ending in the suffixes *-oþ*, *-dōm*, *-end*, *-els*, *-uc*, *-ling*, *-ere*, *-hād*, and *-sċipe* are all masculine, nouns ending in *-ung*, *-þu*, *-nes*, *-estre*, *-rǣden*, and *-wist* are all feminine, and nouns ending in *-lāc*, *-et*, *-ærn*, and *-ċen* are all neuter. *Mæġden* ("girl") is neuter because it ends in the neuter [diminutive suffix](/source/Diminutive_suffix) *-en*.

- Letters of the alphabet are all masculine.

- Metals are all neuter.

- Adjectives used as nouns, such as colors, are neuter unless they refer to people. When they *do* refer to people, they are masculine by default unless the person is known to be a female, in which case they duly follow the feminine inflections: *fremde* ("stranger"), *fremdu* ("[female] stranger"); *dēadlīċ* ("mortal"), *dēadlīcu* ("[female] mortal").

- Verbs are neuter when used as nouns.

Since gender is noun-specific and ultimately a feature of [morphophonology](/source/Morphophonology) rather than [semantics](/source/Semantics) (word-meaning), it goes without saying that any "thing" ([referent](/source/Referent)) might be referred to as a different name ([noun](/source/Noun)) of a different gender: a "mountain" could be denoted by the masculine *beorg* or feminine *dūn*, a "star" could be denoted by masculine *steorra* or neuter *tungol*, a "window" could be denoted by neuter *ēagþȳrel* or feminine *ēagduru*, a "tree" could be denoted by neuter *trēo* ("tree") or masculine *bēam*, a "shield wall" denoted by masculine *sċieldweall* or feminine *sċieldburg*.

#### Feminizing suffixes

Old English has two nouns for many types of people: a general term which can refer to both males and females, like Modern English "waiter", and a separate term which refers only to females, like Modern English "waitress". Several different suffixes are used to specify females:

- *-en* is added to miscellaneous words such as *god* ("god") → *gyden* ("goddess"), *ielf* ("elf") → *ielfen* ("female elf"), *þeġn* ("servant") → *þiġnen* ("female servant"), *þēow* ("slave") → *þiewen* ("female slave"), and *nēahġebūr* ("neighbor") → *nēahġebȳren* ("female neighbor").

- *-estre* is the female equivalent of *-ere* and *-end*, both meaning "-er". It is used on many nouns such as *sangere* ("singer") → *sangestre* ("female singer"), *lufiend* ("lover") → *lufestre* ("female lover"), *bæcere* ("baker") → *bæcestre*, *tæppere* ("bartender") → *tæppestre*, and *forspennend* ("pimp") → *forspennestre*.

- *-e* is the female equivalent of *-a*, which was sometimes a regular noun ending with no meaning and sometimes yet another suffix meaning "-er". Examples include *wyrhta* ("worker") → *wyrhte* and *foregenġa* ("predecessor") → *foregenġe*.

Sometimes the female equivalent is a totally separate word, as in *lārēow* ("teacher") ~ *lǣrestre* ("female teacher", as if the general term were **lǣrere*), *lǣċe* ("doctor") ~ *lācnestre* ("female doctor", as if the general term were **lācnere*), and *hlāford* ("master", literally "bread guardian") ~ *hlǣfdiġe* ("mistress", literally "bread kneader").

### Case

As in several other old [Germanic languages](/source/Germanic_languages), Old English declensions include five [cases](/source/Grammatical_case): [nominative](/source/Nominative), [accusative](/source/Accusative), [dative](/source/Dative), [genitive](/source/Genitive), and [instrumental](/source/Instrumental_case).[8]

- **[Nominative](/source/Nominative_case)**: the subject of a sentence, which carries out the action. *Hē lufode hīe* ("he loved her"), *þæt mæġden rann* ("the girl ran"). Words on the other side of "to be" also take this case: in the phrase *wyrd is eall* ("destiny is all"), both "destiny" and "all" are nominative.

- **[Accusative](/source/Accusative_case)**: the [direct object](/source/Direct_object), that which is acted upon. *Hē lufode hīe* ("he loved her"), *sē ridda ācwealde þone dracan* ("the knight slew the dragon").

- **[Genitive](/source/Genitive_case)**: the possessor of something. *Ġesāwe þū þæs hundes bān?* ("Have you seen the dog's bone?"). The genitive in Old English corresponds to 's in present-day English and to "of" in present-day English. Hence, "The fall of Rome" was *Rōme hryre*, literally "Rome's fall", and "the god of thunder" was *þunres god*, literally "thunder's god". Old English has the preposition "of" but the genitive was the main way of indicating possession.[9] The genitive case could be used [partitively](/source/Partitive), to signify that something was composed of something else: "a group of people" was *manna hēap* (literally "people's group"), "three of us" was *ūre þrī* ("our three"), and "a cup of water" was *wætres cuppe* ("water's cup").

- **[Dative](/source/Dative_case)**: the [indirect object](/source/Indirect_object). *Iċ sealde hire þone beall* ("I gave her the ball").

- **[Instrumental](/source/Instrumental_case)**: something that is being used. *Hwæl mē meahte mid āne sleġe besenċan oþþe ofslēan* ("A whale could sink or kill me with one blow"). This case can be used without prepositions when the meaning is clear, as in *ōðre naman*, which means "[by] another name": *Ūhtred sē Godlēasa æt Bebban byrġ, ōðre naman sē Deneslaga* ("Uhtred the Godless of Bebbanburg, also known as the Daneslayer"). During the Old English period, the instrumental was falling out of use, having mostly merged with the dative. It was distinguished from the dative only in the masculine and neuter singular of strong adjectives and [demonstratives](/source/Demonstrative), and even then the dative was often used instead.

### Noun classes

Not all nouns take the same endings to [inflect](/source/Inflection) for [number](/source/Grammatical_number) and [case](/source/Grammatical_case). Instead, each noun belongs to one of eight different classes, and each class has a different set of endings (sometimes several, depending on subtype).

In [Proto-Germanic](/source/Proto-Germanic_language), one could tell which class a noun was by its ending in the nominative singular. But by the Old English period, most of these endings had disappeared or merged with other endings, so this was no longer possible.

#### a-stems

A-stem nouns are by far the largest class, totaling 60% of all nouns.[10] Some are masculine, some are neuter. They are called a-stems because in Proto-Germanic times, they ended in *-az* (if masculine) or *-ą* (if neuter). However, in Old English, both these endings have vanished, and masculines only differ from neuters in the nominative/accusative plural.

Masculine a-stems are almost all inflected the same, as in *hund* ("dog") below. The neuter a-stems, however, are split in two: some of them end in *-u* in the nominative/accusative plural, while others have no ending there at all. This was caused by a sound change called [high vowel](/source/High_vowel) [apocope](/source/Apocope), which occurred in the prehistory of Old English. [Short](/source/Vowel_length) *-i* and *-u* [disappeared at the ends of words](/source/Apocope) after a [heavy syllable](/source/Syllable_weight)—that is, a syllable containing a [long vowel](/source/Vowel_length) or [long](/source/Vowel_length) [diphthong](/source/Diphthong) or ending in two or more consonants—and after two light syllables.[11] Nouns which kept short -i/-u are called light, while nouns which lost them are called heavy.

The a-stems come in three separate declensions: one for masculine nouns, one for "heavy" neuter nouns, and one for "light" neuter nouns. They are exemplified by *hund* ("dog"), *sċip* ("boat"), and *hūs* ("house"):

a-stem declension Case Masculine hund « dog » Neuter Light sċip « boat » Heavy hūs « house » Singular Plural Singular Plural Singular Plural Nominative−Accusative hund hundas sċip sċipu hūs hūs Genitive hundes hunda sċipes sċipa hūses hūsa Dative hunde hundum sċipe sċipum hūse hūsum

#### ō-stems

The ō-stems are by far the largest class after a-stems. They include the vast majority of feminine nouns, and zero nouns with [Null morphemes](/source/Null_morpheme) of any other gender.

They are called ō-stems because they ended in *-ō* in Proto-Germanic, but in Old English that ending has changed to *-u* or vanished. In the nominative singular, "light" ō-stems end in *-u* while "heavy" ō-stems have no ending, just like neuter a-stems in the nominative/accusative plural.

ō-stem declension Case Light ġiefu « gift » Heavy rād « ride » Singular Plural Singular Plural Nominative ġiefu ġiefa rād rāda Accusative ġiefe ġiefa, -e rāde rāda, -e Genitive ġiefa rāda Dative ġiefum rādum

#### n-stems

N-stems can be any gender, though there are only a few neuters: *ēage* ("eye"), *ēare* ("ear"), *wange* ("cheek"), and compounds ending in them, such as *þunwange* ("temple [of the head]"). N-stems are also called "weak nouns", because they are "weakly" inflected; i.e., most of their inflections have the same ending, *-an*. All other nouns are called "strong nouns".

Masculine and feminine n-stems are inflected the same except in the nominative singular, where masculines end in *-a*, feminines in *-e*:

n-stem declension Case Masculine mōna « moon » Feminine sunne « sun » Singular Plural Singular Plural Nominative mōna mōnan sunne sunnan Accusative mōnan sunnan Genitive mōnena sunnena Dative mōnum sunnum

The few neuter n-stems are declined the same as feminines, except they also have *-e* in the accusative singular:

n-stem declension Neuter ēage « eye » Case Singular Plural Nominative−Accusative ēage ēagan Genitive ēagan ēagena Dative ēagum

#### i-stems

The i-stems are so called because they ended in *-iz* in Proto-Germanic, but in Old English that ending has either become *-e* (in light i-stems) or vanished (in heavy i-stems). These nouns come in every gender, though neuter i-stems are rare.

By the earliest Old English prose, this class has already largely merged with other classes: masculine and neuter i-stems have taken on the same declension as a-stems, and feminine i-stems have *almost* the same declension as ō-stems. So, they are really only called i-stems because of their history, not because of how they inflect.

Their only distinct inflection survives in the accusative singular of feminine heavy i-stems, which fluctuates between *-e* (the ō-stem ending) and no ending (the inherited ending):

tīd « time » Case Singular Plural Nominative tīd tīda Accusative tīd, tīde tīda, -e Genitive tīde tīda Dative tīdum

The exceptions are a few nouns that [only come in the plural](/source/Plurale_tantum), namely *lēode* ("people") and various names of nationalities, such as *Engle* ("the English") and *Dene* ("the Danes"). These nouns kept the nominative/accusative plural *-e* that they inherited through regular sound change.

Case Engle « the English » Nominative−Accusative Engle Genitive Engla Dative Englum

#### u-stems

The **u-stems** are all masculine or feminine. They are all declined the same way, regardless of gender:

u-stem declension Case Light sunu « son » Heavy hand « hand » Singular Plural Singular Plural Nominative−Accusative sunu suna hand handa Genitive suna handa Dative sunum handum

There are few pure u-stem nouns, but some are very common: *duru* ("door"), *medu* ("mead"), *wudu* ("wood"). Most historical u-stems have been transferred over to the a-stems. Some nouns follow the a-stem inflection overall, but have a few leftover u-stem forms in their inflection. These forms may exist alongside regular a-stem forms:

- *feld*: dative singular *felda*

- *ford*: dative singular *forda*

- *winter*: dative singular *wintra*

- *æppel*: nominative/accusative plural *æppla*

#### Root nouns

Root nouns are a small class of nouns which, in [Proto-Germanic](/source/Proto-Germanic_language), had ended in a consonant without any intervening vowel.

These nouns undergo [i-umlaut](/source/I-umlaut) in the dative singular and the nominative/accusative plural. This is the source of nouns in Modern English which form their plural by changing a vowel, as in man ~ men, foot ~ feet, tooth ~ teeth, mouse ~ mice, goose ~ geese, and louse ~ lice. In Old English, there were many more such words, including *bōc* ("book"), *cū* ("cow"), *gāt* ("goat"), *āc* ("oak"), *hnutu* ("nut"), *burg* ("city"), and *sulh* ("plow").

All root nouns are either masculine or feminine. Masculine root nouns are all heavy, but among feminines there is a contrast between light nouns and heavy nouns: light nouns end in *-e* where they have umlaut of the root vowel, while heavy nouns have no ending. The typical declension is this:

root noun declension Case Masculine mann « person » Feminine Light hnutu « nut » Heavy gōs « goose » Singular Plural Singular Plural Singular Plural Nominative−Accusative mann menn hnutu hnyte gōs gēs Genitive mannes manna hnute hnuta gōse gōsa Dative menn mannum hnyte hnutum gēs gōsum

#### nd-stems

Nd-stems are nouns formed with the suffix *-end*, which creates [agent nouns](/source/Agent_noun) from verbs: *āgan* ("to own") → *āgend* ("owner"). All are masculine.

Single-syllable nd-stems are only possible when the stem ends in a vowel, which is rare; hence, only three are attested: *frēond* ("friend") ← *frēoġan* ("to love"), *fēond* ("enemy") ← *fēoġan* ("to hate"), and *tēond* ("accuser") ← *tēon* ("to accuse"). They are declined just like masculine root nouns:

nd-stem declension (one-syllable) frēond « friend » Case Singular Plural Nominative−Accusative frēond frīend Genitive frēondes frēonda Dative frīend frēondum

The multi-syllable nd-stems are declined very differently. Their stem vowel never undergoes [i-umlaut](/source/I-umlaut), and in fact, they are inflected just like a-stems in the singular. Moreover, their plural forms are truly unique: the genitive plural always ends in *-ra*, which is normally used for adjectives, and the nominative/accusative plural varies between no ending, the adjective ending *-e*, and the a-stem ending *-as*. The adjectival endings are a relic of the nd-stems' origin as [present participles](/source/Present_participle).

nd-stem declension (multi-syllable) ymbstandend « bystander » Case Singular Plural Nominative−Accusative ymbstandend ymbstandend, -e, -as Genitive ymbstandendes ymbstandendra Dative ymbstandende ymbstandendum

#### r-stems

The **r-stems** comprise only five nouns: *fæder*, *mōdor*, *brōþor*, *sweostor*, and *dohtor*.

*Brōþor*, *mōdor*, and *dohtor* are all inflected the same, with i-umlaut in the dative singular. *Sweostor* is inflected the same except without i-umlaut. *Fæder* is indeclinable in the singular like *sweostor*, but has taken its nominative/accusative plural from the a-stems. In addition, *brōþor* and *sweostor* often take the prefix *ġe-* in the plural, while the rest never do.

r-stem declension Case fæder mōdor brōþor sweostor dohtor Singular Plural Singular Plural Singular Plural Singular Plural Singular Plural Nominative−Accusative fæder fæderas mōdor mōdru, -a brōþor (ġe)brōþor, -ru, -ra sweostor (ġe)sweostor, -ru, -ra dohtor dohtor, -ru, -ra Genitive fædera mōdra (ġe)brōþra (ġe)sweostra dohtra Dative fæderum mēder mōdrum brēþer (ġe)brōþrum (ġe)sweostrum dehter dohtrum

#### z-stems

Z-stems are the name given to four neuter nouns which inflect like light neuter a-stems, except the plural endings begin with *-r-*. These nouns are *ċild* ("child"), *ǣġ* ("egg"), *lamb* ("lamb"), and *ċealf* ("calf").

z-stem declension lamb Case Singular Plural Nominative−Accusative lamb lambru Genitive lambes lambra Dative lambe lambrum

#### Irregularities

The above only mentions the most common ways each noun class is inflected. There are many variations even within classes, some of which include:

- [High vowel](/source/High_vowel) [apocope](/source/Apocope) (loss of [short](/source/Vowel_length) *-i* and *-u* at the end of a word) is not entirely consistent. At first, these sounds were lost after a heavy syllable or two light syllables. But then, at some point before the written period, speakers started re-adding *-u* to the plurals of some neuter nouns where it had originally vanished. These nouns have two competing plurals, one with *-u* and one without it. So, "dreams" is either *swefn* or *swefnu*, "sails" is either *seġl* or *seġlu*, and "waters" is either *wæter* or *wætru*, among many other examples. Note that this mainly happened to a very specific set of nouns: those whose inflectional endings are preceded by a consonant plus /n/, /l/, or /r/.

- Some nouns have *-u* after a heavy syllable because, when high vowel apocope occurred, they had an intervening light syllable which later disappeared. Examples include nouns with the suffix *-þu* such as *strengðu* ("strength") and *iermðu* ("poverty"), z-stem plurals such as *ǣġru* ("eggs") and *ċealfru* ("calves"), and the a-stem plurals *hēafdu* ("heads") and *dēoflu* ("demons"). Also the plurals of all neuter a-stems that end in *-e*: *wīte* ("punishment"), pl. *wītu*; *ǣrende* ("message"), pl. *ǣrendu*.

- Some ō-stems unexpectedly end in *-u* in the singular, such as *þīestru* ("darkness"), *hǣtu* ("heat"), *meniġu* ("crowd"), *ieldu* ("age"), and *bieldu* ("bravery"). These nouns once belonged to a separate class called the īn-stems, which all ended in *-ī*. Then they merged with the ō-stems when this ending was replaced with *-u*—well after high vowel apocope had gone to completion, so the *-u* remained.

- Many nouns which end with an unstressed vowel plus a single consonant [lose the unstressed vowel](/source/Syncope_(phonology)) when they take inflectional endings: *gristel* ("cartilage"), *gristles* ("of cartilage"). However, it is impossible to predict which nouns this happens to without knowing the history of the word. For example, *Dryhten* ("the Lord") loses its unstressed *-e-* when inflected, but *nīeten* ("animal") does not; *ēðel* ("homeland") does, but *crypel* ("cripple") does not.[12]

- If an a-stem ends in one consonant and its stem vowel is short /æ/, it becomes /ɑ/ in the plural. "Day" is *dæġ* but "days" is *dagas*, "bath" is *bæþ* but "baths" is *baðu*. Other examples include *fæt* ("container"), *sċræf* ("cave"), *stæf* ("staff"), *pæþ* ("path"), *hwæl* ("whale"), and *blæd* ("blade").

- A-stems which end in *ġ*, *ċ*, or *sċ* after a vowel have hard *g*, *c*, or *sc* in the plural: *fisċ* /fiʃ/ ("fish"), pl. *fiscas* /ˈfiskɑs/. Other examples include *dæġ* ("day"), *weġ* ("way"), *twiġ* ("twig"), *disċ* ("plate"), *dīċ* ("ditch"), *līċ* ("corpse"), and *wīċ* ("village").

- If a noun ends in *h*, the *h* disappears before inflectional endings. This [lengthens](/source/Compensatory_lengthening) the preceding [vowel](/source/Vowel) or [diphthong](/source/Diphthong) (if it is short). Unless the *h* comes right after a consonant, it also [deletes](/source/Syncope_(phonology)) the following vowel, except in the genitive plural, where an *-n-* has been inserted to prevent this from happening. All this is exemplified by two masculine a-stems, *sċōh* and *fearh*:

nouns ending in h Case sċōh « shoe » fearh « piglet » Singular Plural Singular Plural Nominative−Accusative sċōh sċōs fearh fēaras Genitive sċōs sċōna fēares fēara Dative sċō sċōm fēare fēarum

- If an a-stem ends in *-u*, the *u* is replaced with *w* before inflectional endings: *searu* ("machine"), dat. sg. *searwe*.

- Something similar happens with a subgroup of ō-stem nouns called the wō-stems. These nouns once ended in *-wu*, before a sound change occurred which caused the *w* to disappear in the nominative singular; subsequently some also lost the *-u* by high vowel apocope. By the written period, they are indistinguishable from other ō-stems in the nominative singular, except they keep the *w* before inflectional endings. These nouns include *sċeadu* ("shadow/shade"), *sinu* ("sinew"), *mǣd* ("meadow"), and *lǣs* ("pasture").

wō-stem declension Case Light sċeadu « shadow » Heavy mǣd « meadow » Singular Plural Singular Plural Nominative sċeadu sċeadwa mǣd mǣdwa Accusative sċeadwe sċeadwa, -e mǣdwe mǣdwa, -e Genitive sċeadwa mǣdwa Dative sċeadwum mǣdwum

## Adjectives

Adjectives [take different endings](/source/Inflection) depending on the [case](/source/Grammatical_case), [gender](/source/Grammatical_gender), and [number](/source/Grammatical_number) of the noun they describe. The adjective *cwic* ("alive"), for example, comes in eleven different forms: *cwic*, *cwic**u***, *cwic**ne***, *cwic**e***, *cwic**es***, *cwic**re***, *cwic**um***, *cwic**a***, *cwic**ra***, *cwic**an***, and *cwic**ena***.

### Strong and weak declension

There are two separate sets of inflections, traditionally called the "strong declension" and the "weak declension". Together, both declensions contain many different inflections, though just ten or eleven unique forms typically cover all of them. The usual endings are exhibited by *cwic* ("alive") among many other adjectives:

Strong declension of cwic Singular Masculine Neuter Feminine Nominative cwic cwic cwicu Accusative cwicne cwice Genitive cwices cwicre Dative cwicum Instrumental cwice Plural Masculine Neuter Feminine Nominative cwice cwicu cwica Accusative cwica, -e Genitive cwicra Dative−Instrumental cwicum

Weak declension of cwic Singular Plural Masculine Feminine Neuter Any gender Nominative cwica cwice cwice cwican Accusative cwican Genitive cwican cwicena Dative−Instrumental cwicum

In general, the weak declension is used after the words for "the/that" and "this" and [possessive determiners](/source/Possessive_determiner) such as "my", "your", and "his", while the strong declension is used the rest of the time. Hence "a live scorpion" is *cwic þrōwend*, while "the live scorpion" is *sē cwic**a** þrōwend*. Further details:

- The weak declension is also used in [direct address](/source/Noun_of_address), as in *Ēalā fæġere mæġden* ("Hey beautiful girl").

- [Ordinal numbers](/source/Ordinal_number) and [comparative adjectives](/source/Comparative) only take the weak declension, even in situations that would otherwise call for the strong declension. The most important exception is *ōðer* ("other/second"), which is always strong despite being both an ordinal number and a comparative. Of the four words for "first", *forma* and *ǣrra* are always weak, but *ǣrest* and *fyrest* can be either strong or weak just like most other adjectives.

- The adjective *āgen* ("own") is usually strong in the phrase "one's own": *Hēo forlēt ōðre dæġe on hire āgnum horse* ("She left the next day on her own horse").

### Irregularities

Adjectives once came in many different classes just like nouns, but by Old English times, all adjectives have basically the same endings as *cwic* above. However, there are still a good number of differences and irregularities:

- As with nouns, there are "light" adjectives which retain the inflectional ending *-u* (which occurs in the feminine nominative singular and neuter nominative/accusative plural), and "heavy" adjectives which have lost it. Originally *-u* disappeared after a heavy syllable or two light syllables, but speakers have re-added it to some adjectives where it had been lost. Namely, those with the suffixes *-iġ* or *-līċ*: *bisigu sweord* ("busy swords" [nom. pl. neut.]), *broðorlīcu lufu* ("brotherly love" [nom. sg. fem.]).[13][12]

- Some adjectives have *-u* after a heavy syllable because, when high vowel apocope occurred, they had an intervening light syllable which later disappeared. Examples include *lȳtel* ("little"), nom. sg. fem./nom-acc. pl. neut *lȳtlu*; *ōðer* ("other"), nom. sg. fem./nom-acc. pl. neut *ōðru*; and *ēower* ("your"), nom. sg. fem./nom-acc. pl. neut. *ēowru*.

- Adjectives ending in *-e* all lose the *-e* before inflectional endings: *blīðe* ("happy"), nom. sg. masc. *blīðne*. They also all retain *-u*: *blīðu ċildru* ("happy children").[14]

- If an adjective ends in short *æ* plus a single consonant, the *æ* becomes *a* before endings beginning with a vowel: *glæd* ("glad"), nom. pl. masc. *glade*.

- If an adjective ends in *h*, the *h* disappears before inflectional endings. This [lengthens](/source/Compensatory_lengthening) the preceding [vowel](/source/Vowel) or [diphthong](/source/Diphthong): *þweorh* ("crooked"), *þwēorre* gen. sg. fem. Also, if the *h* comes right after a vowel, any immediately following vowel disappears: *hēah* ("high"), acc. sg. masc. *hēane*, dat. sg. masc. *hēam*, nom. pl. masc. *hēa*.

- If an adjective ends in *-u*, it changes to *o* before an inflectional ending beginning with a consonant: *ġearu* ("ready"), acc. sg. masc. *ġearone*, dat. sg. fem. *ġearore*. Before a vowel, it changes to *w*: nom. pl. masc. *ġearwe*.

- Most adjectives ending in *ġ*, *ċ*, or *sċ* have hard *g*, *c*, or *sc* before an ending beginning with a [back vowel](/source/Back_vowel) (/ɑ/, /o/, /u/). *Ġesċādlīċ* ("rational"), nom. pl. fem. *ġesċādlīca*; *mennisċ* ("human"), dat. sg. neut. *menniscum*.

- Many adjectives which end in an unstressed vowel plus a single consonant [lose the unstressed vowel](/source/Syncope_(phonology)) before endings beginning with vowels: *lȳtel* ("little"), nom. pl. fem. *lȳtla*.

### Degree

Old English never uses the equivalents of "more" and "most" to form [comparative](/source/Comparative) or [superlative](/source/Superlative) adjectives. Instead, the equivalents of "-er" and "-est" are used (*-ra* and *-ost*, for some words *-est*). "More beautiful" is *fæġerra*, literally "beautiful-er", and "most beautiful" is *fæġerost*, literally "beautiful-est".[a] Other examples include *beorht* ("bright") → *beorhtra* ("brighter"), *beorhtost* ("brightest"); *bearnēacen* ("pregnant") → *bearnēacenra* ("more pregnant"), *bearnēacnost* ("most pregnant"); and *cnihtlīċ* ("boyish") → *cnihtlīcra* ("more boyish"), *cnihtlīcost* ("most boyish"). The only exception is that "more" (*[mā](https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/ma#Old_English)* or *[swīðor](https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/swi%C3%BEor#Old_English)*) and "most" (*[mǣst](https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/m%C3%A6st#Old_English)* or *[swīðost](https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/swi%C3%BEost#Old_English)*) were sometimes used with [participles](/source/Participle): *swīðor ġelufod* ("more loved"), *swīðost ġelufod* ("most loved").

A handful of words form the comparative and superlative with [i-umlaut](/source/I-umlaut), namely *eald* ("old") → *ieldra*, *ieldest*; *ġeong* ("young") → *ġingra*, *ġinġest*; *strang* ("strong") → *strengra*, *strenġest*; *lang* ("long") → *lengra*, *lenġest*; *sċort* ("short") → *sċyrtra*, *sċyrtest*; and *hēah* ("high") → *hīera*, *hīehst*.

A few more [become totally different words](/source/Suppletion): *gōd* ("good") → *betera*, *betst*; *yfel* ("bad") → *wiersa*, *wierrest*; *miċel* ("much/a lot/big") → *māra* ("more/bigger"), *mǣst* ("most/biggest"); *lȳtel* ("little") → *lǣssa* ("less/smaller"), *lǣsest* ("least/smallest").

## Articles

Old English has no [indefinite article](/source/Indefinite_article).[15] Instead, a noun is most often used by itself:

Old English Ūs is lēofre þæt wē hæbben healtne cyning þonne healt rīċe. Literal gloss Us is dearer that we have crippled king than crippled kingdom. Translation We would rather have a crippled king than a crippled kingdom.

The [definite article](/source/Definite_article) is *sē*, which doubles as the word for "that". It comes in eleven different forms depending on [case](/source/Grammatical_case), [gender](/source/Grammatical_gender), and [number](/source/Grammatical_number): *sē*, *sēo*, *þæt*, *þone*, *þā*, *þæs*, *þǣre*, *þām*, *þon*, *þȳ*, and *þāra*.

Declension of sē Singular Plural Masculine Neuter Feminine Nominative sē þæt sēo þā Accusative þone þā Genitive þæs þǣre þāra Dative þām þām Instrumental þon, þȳ

The word "the" was used very much like in Modern English. The main difference is that it was used somewhat more sparingly, due to numerous groups of nouns which usually went without it. These include:[16][17][18]

- All river names. *On Temese flēat ān sċip* ("A boat was floating on the Thames").

- Names of peoples. Ex: *Seaxan* ("the Saxons"), *Winedas* ("the Slavs"), *Siġelhearwan* ("the Ethiopians"), *Indēas* ("the Indians"). Names of peoples also frequently stand for the place they are from: for example, the word for [Essex](/source/Essex) was *Ēastseaxan* ("the East Saxons"), and "the prince of Denmark" was *Dena æðeling*, literally "prince of the Danes".

- A few nouns denoting types of locations, namely *sǣ* ("the sea"), *wudu* ("the woods"), and *eorðe* ("the ground"). *Þū fēolle on eorðan and slōge þīn hēafod* ("You fell on the ground and hit your head"). Also "the world", whether expressed with *weorold* or *middanġeard*. Note that "sea" is still sometimes used without "the" in Modern English, in fossilized phrases like "at sea" and "out to sea".

- A couple of abstract concepts, namely *sōþ* ("the truth") and *ǣ* ("the law").

- Many divisions of time. Namely, the words for the morning, the evening, the four seasons, the past, the present, and the future. *Iċ ārās on lætne morgen and ēode niðer* ("I got up late in the morning and went downstairs"). Note that this is similar to Modern English "I go out at night".

- *Dryhten* ("the Lord"). *Dēofol* ("the Devil") often occurs with "the" and often without it.

- The [cardinal directions](/source/Cardinal_direction): *norþ*, *sūþ*, *ēast*, and *west*. Also the [intercardinal directions](/source/Intercardinal_direction): *norðēast*, *sūðēast*, *sūðwest*, and *norðwest*.

- A few set phrases, including *ealle hwīle* ("the whole time", literally "all/whole while"), *be weġe* ("on the way", lit. "by way"), and *ealne weġ* ("all the way" or "always", lit. "all way"). Also *forma sīþ* ("the first time"), *ōðer sīþ* ("the second time"), and so on.

Note that those words still occur with "the" when they refer to a specific iteration, as in "the future that I want", "the woods behind my house", or "the law they just passed".

## Demonstratives

Declension of þēs Singular Plural Masculine Neuter Feminine Nominative þēs þis þēos þās Accusative þisne þās Genitive þisses þisse þissa Dative þissum þissum Instrumental þȳs

There is also the [distal demonstrative](/source/Distal_demonstrative) *ġeon*, the source of Modern English "yon". It means "that over there" and refers to things far away. *Ġeon* is declined like a regular adjective, that is like *cwic* above.

## Pronouns

### Interrogative pronouns

*Hwā* ("who") and *hwæt* ("what") follow [socio-cultural gender](/source/Gender),[b] not [grammatical gender](/source/Grammatical_gender): as in Modern English, *hwā* is used with people, *hwæt* with things. However, that distinction only matters in the [nominative](/source/Nominative_case) and [accusative cases](/source/Accusative_case), because in every other case they are identical:

Declension of hwā and hwæt "who" "what" Nominative hwā hwæt Accusative hwone Genitive hwæs Dative hwām Instrumental hwon, hwȳ

*Hwelċ* ("which" or "what kind of") is inflected like an adjective. Same with *hwæðer*, which also means "which" but is only used between two alternatives:

Old English Hwæðer wēnst þū is māre, þē þīn sweord þē mīn? Translation Which one do you think is bigger, your sword or mine?

### Personal pronouns

The first and second-person pronouns are the same for all genders. They also have special [dual forms](/source/Dual_(grammatical_number)), which are only used for groups of two things, as in "we both" and "you two". The dual forms are common, but the ordinary plural forms can always be used instead when the meaning is clear.

Personal pronouns Case 1st person 2nd person 3rd person Singular Dual Plural Singular Dual Plural Singular Plural Masculine Neuter Feminine Nominative iċ wit wē þū ġit ġē hē hit hēo hīe Accusative mē unc ūs þē inc ēow hine hit hīe Dative him hire him Genitive mīn uncer ūre þīn incer ēower his heora

Whilst most Old English texts have the accusative and dative pronouns in the first and second person merged, some texts, most notably those of Anglian dialects and in poetry, preserve the distinction. *mec* (accusative) and *þec* (accusative), the first and second person singular respectively, are descended from the original Proto-Germanic stressed pronouns, meanwhile for the dual and plural, whose accusative and dative forms had merged through regular sound change by the time of Proto-West Germanic, new forms were coined by suffixing *-iċ* or *-it* to the dative forms. This gave *ūsiċ* and *ēowiċ* for the first and second plural, and *uncit* and *incit* for the first and second dual.

Many of the forms above bear a strong resemblance to the Modern English words they eventually became. For instance, in the genitive case, *ēower* became "your", *ūre* became "our", and *mīn* became "my". However, in stressed positions, the plural third-person personal pronouns were all replaced with [Old Norse](/source/Old_Norse) forms during the [Middle English](/source/Middle_English) period, yielding "they", "them" and "their". (The Old English dative pronoun is retained as unstressed '*em*.)

## Verbs

Old English verbs are divided into two groups: [strong verbs](/source/Strong_inflection) and [weak verbs](/source/Weak_inflection). Strong verbs form the past tense by changing a [vowel](/source/Vowel), while weak verbs add an ending.

### Strong verbs

Further information: [Germanic strong verb](/source/Germanic_strong_verb)

Strong verbs use a [Germanic](/source/Germanic_languages) form of [conjugation](/source/Grammatical_conjugation) known as [*ablaut*](/source/Indo-European_ablaut). They form the past tense by changing their stem vowel. These verbs still exist in modern English; *sing, sang, sung* is a strong verb, as are *swim, swam, swum* and *break, broke, broken*. In modern English, strong verbs are rare, and they are mostly categorised as irregular verbs.

In Old English, meanwhile, strong verbs were much more common and were not considered irregular. The system of strong verbs was more coherent, including seven major classes, each with its own pattern of stem changes.

Over time the system of strong verbs became less functional: new verbs were coined or borrowed as weak verbs, meaning strong verbs became rarer, and sound changes made their patterns harder to distinguish. Many verbs that in Old English were strong verbs, such as: *abide, bake, ban, bark, bow, braid, burst, carve, chew, climb, creep, delve, drag, fare, fart, flee, float, flow, gnaw, grip, help, laugh, leap, let, load, lock, melt, milk, mow, quell, read, row, shine, shove, slay, sleep, sneeze, spurn, starve, step, suck, swallow, sweep, swell, thresh, walk, wash, weep, wreak,* and *yield* have become weak verbs in modern English. This tendency for strong verbs to become weak dates as far back as Old English: *sleep* (*slǣpan*) and *read* (*rǣdan*) both shifted from strong to weak in the Old English period.

Learning strong verbs is often a challenge for students of Old English, though modern English speakers may see connections between the old verb classes and their modern forms.

The classes had the following distinguishing features to their infinitive stems, each corresponding to particular stem changes within their strong-conjugating paradigms:

1. ī + one consonant.
1. ēo or ū + one consonant.
1. Originally e + two consonants. By the time of written Old English, many had changed. If C is used to represent any consonant, verbs in this class usually had short e + lC; short eo + rC; short i + nC/mC; or (g̣ +) short ie + lC.
1. e + one consonant (usually l or r, plus the verb *brecan* 'to break').
1. e + one consonant (usually a stop or a fricative).
1. a + one consonant.
1. Other than the above. Always a heavy root syllable (either a long vowel or short + two consonants), almost always a non-umlauted vowel – e.g., ō, ā, ēa, a (+ nC), ea (+ lC/rC), occ. ǣ (the latter with past in ē instead of normal ēo). Infinitive is distinguishable from class 1 weak verbs by non-umlauted root vowel; from class 2 weak verbs by lack of suffix *-ian*. First and second preterite have identical stems, usually in ēo (occ. ē), and the infinitive and the past participle also have the same stem.

Stem changes in strong verbs Verb class Stem vowel Class Root weight Non-past First past Second past Past participle 1 heavy ī ā i 2 ēo, ū ēa u o 3 e (+CC) æ u o e (+lC), eo (+rC/ hC) ea i (+nC) a u 4 light e(+r/l) æ ǣ o 5 e(+other) e 6 a ō a 7 heavy various ē or ēo same as infinitive

The first [past](/source/Preterite) stem is used in the past, for the [first](/source/Grammatical_person) and third-person [singular](/source/Grammatical_number). The second past stem is used for second-person singular, and all persons in the [plural](/source/Plural) (as well as the preterite [subjunctive](/source/Old_English_subjunctive)). Strong verbs also exhibit [i-mutation](/source/I-mutation#I-mutation_in_Old_English) of the stem in the second and third-person singular in the [present tense](/source/Present_tense).

The third class went through many sound changes, becoming barely recognisable as a single class. The first was a process called ['breaking'](/source/Old_English_phonology#Breaking_and_retraction). Before ⟨h⟩, and ⟨r⟩ + another consonant, ⟨æ⟩ turned into ⟨ea⟩, and ⟨e⟩ to ⟨eo⟩. Also, before ⟨l⟩ + another consonant, the same happened to ⟨æ⟩, but ⟨e⟩ remained unchanged (except before the combination ⟨lh⟩).

A second sound change turned ⟨e⟩ to ⟨i⟩, ⟨æ⟩ to ⟨a⟩, and ⟨o⟩ to ⟨u⟩ before nasals.

Altogether, this split the third class into four sub-classes:

1. e + two consonants (apart from clusters beginning with l).
1. eo + r or h + another consonant.
1. e + l + another consonant.
1. i + nasal + another consonant.

Regular strong verbs were all conjugated roughly the same, with the main differences being in the stem vowel. Thus *stelan* "to steal" represents the strong verb conjugation paradigm.

Strong verb conjugation Strong verb conjugation Stelan "to steal" Infinitives stelan -an tō stelanne tō -anne Participle Present stelende -ende Past (ġe)stolen (ġe)- -en Indicative Present Singular 1st person stele -e 2nd person stilst -st 3rd person stilþ -þ Plural stelaþ -aþ Past Singular 1st person stæl -_ 2nd person stǣle -e 3rd person stæl -_ Plural stǣlon -on Subjunctive Present Singular stele -e Plural stelen -en Past Singular stǣle -e Plural stǣlen -en Imperative Singular stel -_ Plural stelaþ -aþ

### Weak verbs

Further information: [Germanic weak verb](/source/Germanic_weak_verb)

Weak verbs form the past tense by adding endings with *-d-* in them (sometimes *-t-*) to the stem. In Modern English, these endings have merged as *-ed*, forming the past tense for most verbs, such as *love, loved* and *look, looked*.

Weak verbs already make up the vast majority of verbs in Old English. There are two major types: class I and class II. A class III also existed, but contained only four verbs.

#### Class I

By the Old English period, new class I weak verbs had stopped being produced, but so many had been coined in [Proto-Germanic](/source/Proto-Germanic_language) that they were still by far the most common kind of verb in Old English.[19] These verbs are often recognizable because they feature [i-umlaut](/source/I-umlaut) of the word they were derived from, as in *dēman* ("to judge") from *dōm* ("judgment"), *blǣċan* ("to bleach") from *blāc* ("pale"), *tellan* ("to count") from *tæl* ("number"), and *rȳman* ("to make room") from *rūm* ("room"). They are also the source of alterations in Modern English such as *feed* ~ *food*, *fill* ~ *full*, and *breed* ~ *brood*.

Class I weak verbs are not all [conjugated](/source/Grammatical_conjugation) the same. Their exact endings depend on a complex combination of factors, mostly involving the [length](/source/Vowel_length) of the stem vowel and which consonants the stem ends in, and sometimes also the history of the word. But the largest number are conjugated the same as *dǣlan* ("to share"):

Conjugation of dǣlan Infinitive dǣlan (tō) dǣlenne Indicative Present Past 1sg. dǣle dǣlde 2sg. dǣlst dǣldest 3sg. dǣlþ dǣlde pl. dǣlaþ dǣldon Subjunctive Present Past sg. dǣle dǣlde pl. dǣlen dǣlden Imperative sg. dǣl pl. dǣlaþ Participle Present Past dǣlende (ġe)dǣled

Many verbs ending in a [double consonant](/source/Gemination) are conjugated like *temman* ("to tame"), with the same endings and the same alternation between single and double consonants:

Conjugation of temman Infinitive teman (tō) temenne Indicative Present Past 1sg. temme temede 2sg. temest temedest 3sg. temeþ temede pl. temmaþ temedon Subjunctive Present Past sg. temme temede pl. temmen temeden Imperative sg. teme pl. temmaþ Participle Present Past temmende (ġe)temed

Class I weak verbs that end in *-rian* are conjugated like *styrian* ("to move"):

Conjugation of styrian Infinitive styrian (tō) styrienne Indicative Present Past 1sg. styrie styrede 2sg. styrest styredest 3sg. styreþ styrede pl. styraþ styredon Subjunctive Present Past sg. styrie styrede pl. styrien styreden Imperative sg. styre pl. styriaþ Participle Present Past styriende (ġe)styred

#### Class II

Class II weak verbs are easily recognized by the fact that nearly all of them end in *-ian*: *hopian* ("to hope"), *wincian* ("to wink"), *wandrian* ("to wander").

By the Old English period, this was the only [productive](/source/Productivity_(linguistics)) verb class left. Newly created verbs were almost automatically weak class II.[20]

Unlike weak class I, they never cause [i-umlaut](/source/I-umlaut), so their stems are usually identical to the stem of the word they were derived from: *lufu* ("love") → *lufian* ("to love"), *mynet* ("coin") → *mynetian* ("to coin"), *hwelp* ("puppy") → *hwelpian* ("[of animals] to give birth").

Their conjugation is also much simpler than all other verb classes. Almost all weak class II verbs have precisely the same endings, completely unaffected by the makeup of the stem or the history of the word. A typical example is *lufian* ("to love"):

Conjugation of lufian Infinitive lufian (tō) lufienne Indicative Present Past 1sg. lufiġe lufode 2sg. lufast lufodest 3sg. lufaþ lufode pl. lufiaþ lufodon Subjunctive Present Past sg. lufiġe lufode pl. lufiġen lufoden Imperative sg. lufa pl. lufiaþ Participle Present Past lufiende (ġe)lufod

#### Class III

Though it was once much larger, containing many verbs which later became class II, only four verbs still belonged to this group by the period of written texts: *habban* ("to have"), *libban* ("to live") *seċġan* ("to say"), and *hyċġan* "to think". Each of these verbs is distinctly irregular, though they share some commonalities.

Class 3 weak verbs Class 3 weak verbs Suffixes Habban "to have" Libban "to live" Seċġan "to say" Hyċġan "to think" Infinitives -an habban libban seċġan hyċġan tō -enne tō hæbbenne tō libbenne tō seċġenne tō hyċġenne Participle Present -ende hæbbende libbende seċġende hyċġende Past (ġe) -d (ġe)hæfd (ġe)lifd (ġe)sæġd (ġe)hogd Indicative Present Singular 1st person -e hæbbe libbe seċġe hyċġe 2nd person -st hæfst leofast sæġst hyġst 3rd person -þ hæfþ leofaþ sæġþ hyġþ Plural -aþ habbaþ libbaþ seċġaþ hyċġaþ Past Singular 1st person -de hæfde lifde sæġde hogde 2nd person -dest hæfdest lifdest sæġdest hogdest 3rd person -de hæfde lifde sæġde hogde Plural -don hæfdon lifdon sæġdon hogdon Subjunctive Present Singular -e hæbbe libbe seċġe hyċġe Plural -en hæbben libben seċġen hyċġen Past Singular -de hæfde lifde sæġde hogde Plural -den hæfden lifden sæġden hogden Imperative Singular -a hafa leofa sæġe hyġe Plural -aþ habbaþ libbaþ seċġaþ hyċġaþ

### Preterite-present verbs

The preterite-presents are verbs whose present tenses look like the past tenses of strong verbs. This resemblance is not coincidental, since they descend from [Proto-Indo-European stative verbs](/source/Proto-Indo-European_verb#Stative_verbs), which normally developed into the past tense of Germanic languages. The preterite-present verbs are an exception to this development, remaining as independent verbs. For example, the first-person present of *witan* ("to know") originally meant "I have seen", referring to the state of having seen, and by implication "I know". At some point well before Old English, these verbs were given their own past tenses by adding weak past endings, but without an intervening vowel. This lack of an intervening vowel then led to alternations in the consonants, and sometimes vowels as well.

There are only a dozen preterite-presents, but most are among the most frequent verbs in the language. They are *magan* ("can"), *sċulan* ("should/must/to owe"), *mōtan* ("may"), *þurfan* ("to need"), *witan* ("to know"), *cunnan* ("to know/know how"), *ġemunan* ("to remember"), *durran* ("to dare"), *āgan* ("to own"), *dugan* ("to be useful"), *ġenugan* ("to suffice"), and *unnan* ("to grant").

In spite of heavy irregularities, these can be grouped into four groups of similarly conjugated verbs:

1. Āgan, durran, mōtan, and witan

1. Cunnan, ġemunan (outside the past tense), and unnan

1. Dugan, magan, and ġenugan

1. Sċulan and þurfan

Preterite-present stems Preterite-present verbs Participle Indicative Subjunctive Imperative Class Infinitive (Meaning) Present Past Present Past Present Past Singular Plural Singular Plural 1 Āgan "to own" āgende (ġe)āgen āh- āg- āht- āg- āht- āge āgaþ Durran "to dare" durrende (ġe)dorren dearr- durr- dorst- dyrr- dyrst- dyrre durraþ Mōtan "may, to be allowed to" mōtende (ġe)mōten mōt- mōst mōt- mōst- mōte mōtaþ Witan "to know (a fact)" witende (ġe)witen wāt- wit- wist- wit- wist- wite witaþ 2 Cunnan "to know (how to)" cunnende (ġe)cunnen, (ġe)cūþ cann- cunn- cūþ- cunn- cūþ- cunne cunnaþ Ġemunan "remember" ġemunende ġemunen ġeman- ġemun- ġemund- ġemun- ġemund- ġemune ġemunaþ Unnan "grant" unnende (ġe)unnen ann- unn- ūþ- unn- ūþ- unne unnaþ 3 Dugan "work with, avail" dugende (ġe)dugen deah- dug- doht- dug- doht- ġeduge ġedugaþ Ġenugan "to suffice, be enough" ġenugende ġenugen ġeneah- ġenug- ġenoht- ġenug- ġenoht- ġenuge ġenugaþ Magan "can, be able to" mæġende (ġe)mæġen mæg- mag- meaht- mæg- miht- mæge magaþ 4 Sċulan "should, must" sċuldende (ġe)sċulen sċeal- sċul- sċold- sċyl- sċyld- sċyle sċulaþ Þurfan "to need" þurfende (ġe)þurfen þearf- þurf- þorft- þyrf- þyrft- þyrfe þurfaþ

### Anomalous verbs

Additionally, there is a further group of four verbs which are anomalous: "want", "do", "go" and "be". These four have their own conjugation schemes which differ significantly from all the other classes of verb. This is not especially unusual: "want", "do", "go", and "be" are the most commonly used verbs in the language, and are very important to the meaning of the sentences in which they are used. Idiosyncratic patterns of inflection are much more common with important items of vocabulary than with rarely used ones.

*Dōn* 'to do' and *gān* 'to go' are conjugated alike; *willan* 'to want' is similar outside of the present tense.

The verb 'to be' is actually composed of three different stems: one beginning with w-, one beginning with b-, and one beginning with s-. These are traditionally thought of as forming two separate words: *wesan*, comprising the forms beginning with w- and s-, and *bēon*, comprising the forms beginning with b-.

In the present tense, *wesan* and *bēon* carried a difference in meaning. *Wesan* was used in most circumstances, whereas *bēon* was used for the future and for certain kinds of general statements.

Anomalous verbs Anomalous verbs Bēon, "to be" Wesan, "to be" Dōn, "to do" Gān, "to go" Willan "to want" Infinitive bēon wesan dōn gān willan tō bēonne to wesanne tō dōnne tō gānne tō willenne Participle Present bēonde wesende dōnde gānde willende Past (ġe)bēon (ġe)dōn (ġe)gān *(ġe)willen Indicative Present Singular 1st person bēo eom dō gā wille 2nd person bist eart dēst gǣst wilt 3rd person biþ is dēþ gǣþ wile Plural bēoþ sind dōþ gāþ willaþ Past Singular 1st person wæs dyde ēode wolde 2nd person wǣre dydest ēodest woldest 3rd person wæs dyde ēode wolde Plural wǣron dydon ēodon woldon Subjunctive Present Singular bēo sīe dō gā wille Plural bēon sīen dōn gān willen Past Singular wǣre dyde ēode wolde Plural wǣren dyden ēoden wolden Imperative Singular bēo wes dō gā wille Plural bēoþ wesaþ dōþ gāþ willaþ

## Prepositions

Prepositions (like Modern English words *by*, *for*, and *with*) sometimes follow the word which they govern (especially pronouns), in which case they are called *[postpositions](/source/Postposition)*.

The following is a list of prepositions in the [Old English language](/source/Old_English_language). [Prepositions](/source/Prepositions) may govern the [accusative](/source/Accusative_case), [genitive](/source/Genitive_case), [dative](/source/Dative_case) or [instrumental](/source/Instrumental_case) [cases](/source/Declension).

Prepositions Old English Definition Notes æfter after Related to Frisian efter, Dutch achter ("behind"), Icelandic eftir. Ancestor of modern after. ǣr before Related to German eher and Icelandic áður. Ancestor of modern ere. æt at Related to Icelandic að ("to, towards"), and more distantly Latin ad and its descendants in the Romance languages. Ancestor of modern at. andlang along Related to German entlang. Ancestor of modern along. Governs the genitive. bæftan behind Ancestor of modern (nautical) abaft. be, bī by, about Related to West Frisian by, Low German bi, Dutch bij, German bei. Ancestor of modern by. beforan before Related to German bevor. Ancestor of modern before. beġeondan beyond Ancestor of modern beyond behindan behind Ancestor of modern behind. Related to German hinter. binnan in, within Related to German and Dutch binnen benēoðan beneath Ancestor of modern beneath. betwēonum between Ancestor of modern between bufan above Ancestor of modern above through compound form onbufan būtan without, except Related to Dutch buiten. Ancestor of modern but. ēac also Related to Frisian ek, Low German ook, Dutch ook, and German auch. Ancestor of modern (archaic) eke for for, because of, instead of Ancestor of modern for, related to modern German für fram from, by Ancestor of modern from ġeond through Ancestor of modern yonder through comparative form ġeondra. Related to Dutch ginds and (archaic) ginder in in Ancestor of modern in, related to German and Latin in innan within Related to modern German innen intō into Ancestor of modern into mid with Related to modern German mit nēah near Ancestor of modern nigh. German nah of from, out of[9] Ancestor of modern of and off ofer over Ancestor of modern over on on, in Ancestor of modern on onbūtan around Ancestor of modern about onġēan opposite, against; towards; in reply to Ancestor of modern again. Related to German entgegen oþ until samod together Related to German samt tō to Ancestor of modern to, related to German zu tōeācan in addition to, besides tōforan before Related to Dutch tevoren, German zuvor tōgeagnes towards, against Related to Dutch tegen tōweard toward Ancestor of modern toward þurh through Ancestor of modern through. Related to German durch. under under Ancestor of modern under, related to German unter undernēoðan underneath Ancestor of modern underneath uppon upon, on Not the ancestor of modern upon, which came from "up on". ūtan without, outside of Related to modern Swedish utan, German außen. The adverbial form ūt is the ancestor of modern out. wiþ against Ancestor of modern with wiþinnan within Ancestor of modern within wiþūtan outside of Ancestor of modern without ymb around Related to modern German um and Latin ambi

## Syntax

Old English syntax was similar in many ways to that of Modern English. However, there were some important differences. Some were simply consequences of the greater level of nominal and verbal inflection, and word order was generally freer. There are also differences in the default word order and in the construction of negation, questions, relative clauses and subordinate clauses.

- The default [word order](/source/Word_order) was [verb-second](/source/Verb-second); this resembles modern German or Dutch more than Modern English.

- There was no [*do*-support](/source/Do-support) in questions and negatives.

- Multiple negatives could stack up in a sentence and intensified each other ([negative concord](/source/Negative_concord)).

- Sentences with subordinate clauses of the type "When X, Y" did not use a *wh-*type word for the conjunction but used a *th-*type [correlative conjunction](/source/Correlative_conjunction) (e.g., *þā X, þā Y* instead of "When X, Y").

### Word order

There was some flexibility in word order of Old English since the heavily inflected nature of nouns, adjectives, and verbs often indicated the relationships between clause arguments. [Scrambling](/source/Scrambling_(syntax)) of [constituents](/source/Constituent_(linguistics)) was common. Even sometimes scrambling within a constituent occurred, as in *[Beowulf](/source/Beowulf)* line 708 *wrāþum on andan*:

wrāþum on andan hostile (Dative Singular) on/with malice (Dative Singular) "with hostile malice"

Something similar occurs in line 713 *in sele þām hēan* "in the high hall" (lit. "in hall the high").

[Extraposition](/source/Extraposition) of constituents out of larger constituents is common even in prose, as in the well-known tale of [Cynewulf and Cyneheard](/source/Cynewulf_and_Cyneheard), which begins

- *Hēr Cynewulf benam Sigebryht his rīces ond westseaxna wiotan for unryhtum dǣdum, būton Hamtūnscīre; ...*

- (Literally) "Here Cynewulf deprived Sigebryht of his kingdom and West Saxons' counselors for unright deeds, except Hampshire"

- (translated) "Here Cynewulf and the West Saxon counselors deprived Sigebryht of his kingdom, other than Hampshire, for unjust actions"

The words *ond westseaxna wiotan* "and the West Saxon counselors" (lit. "and (the) counselors of (the) West Saxons") have been *extraposed* from (moved out of) the compound subject they belong in, in a way that would be impossible in modern English. In Old English, case inflection preserves the meaning: the verb *beniman* "to deprive" (appearing in this sentence in the form *benam*, "[he] deprived") needs a word in the genitive case to show what someone or something is deprived of, which in this sentence is *rīces* "of kingdom" (nominative *rīce*, "kingdom"), whereas *wiotan* "counselors" is in the nominative case and therefore serves a different role entirely (the genitive of it would be *wiotana*, "of counselors"); for this reason the interpretation that Cynewulf deprived Sigebryht of the West Saxon counselors was not possible for speakers of Old English. The Old English sentence is in theory ambiguous, as it contains one more word in the genitive: *westseaxna* ("of West Saxons", nominative *westseaxan* "West Saxons"), and the form *wiotan* "counselors" may also represent the accusative case in addition to the nominative, thus for example creating the grammatical possibility of the interpretation that Cynewulf also took the West Saxons away from the counselors, but this would have been difficult to conceive.

Main clauses in Old English tend to have a [verb-second](/source/Verb-second) (V2) order, where the finite verb is the second constituent in a sentence, regardless of what comes first. There are vestigial examples of this in modern English: *Rarely **have** I seen ...* However, V2 order was much more extensive in Old English.

In [subordinate clauses](/source/Subordinate_clause), the word order is less restricted, with both verb-second and verb-final word order occurring, though verb-final is more common. Furthermore, in poetry, the rules of prose are frequently broken. In Beowulf, for example, main clauses frequently have verb-initial or verb-final order, recalling earlier stages of Old English syntax. (However, in clauses introduced by *þā*, which can mean either "when" or "then", and where word order is crucial for telling the difference, the normal word order is nearly always followed.)

Linguists who work within the [Chomskyan](/source/Chomskyan) [transformational grammar](/source/Transformational_grammar) paradigm often believe that it is more accurate to describe Old English (and other [Germanic languages](/source/Germanic_languages) with the same word-order patterns like modern German) as having underlying subject-object-verb (SOV) ordering. According to this theory, all sentences are initially generated using this order, but in main clauses, the verb is moved back to the V2 position (technically, the verb undergoes *V-to-T raising*). That is said to explain the fact that Old English allows inversion of subject and verb as a general strategy for forming questions, while modern English uses this strategy almost only with [auxiliary verbs](/source/Auxiliary_verb) and the main verb "to be", requiring [*do*-support](/source/Do-support) in other cases.

#### Questions

Questions are normally formed in Old English by inverting the order of subject and finite verb. For example, *hīe libbaþ* "they live" becomes *libbaþ hīe,* literally "live they?" This is still followed in modern English with verbs such as *be* (*am I?*) and *have* (*have they?*) but for most other contexts it has been replaced by [do-support](/source/Do-support).

### Relative and subordinate clauses

Old English did not use forms equivalent to "who, when, where" in relative clauses (as in "The man whom I saw") or subordinate clauses ("When I got home, I went to sleep").

Instead, [relative clauses](/source/Relative_clause) used one of the following:

1. An invariable complementizer *þe*

1. The [demonstrative pronoun](/source/Demonstrative_pronoun) *se, sēo, þæt*

1. The combination of the two, as in *se þe*

Subordinate clauses tended to use [correlative conjunctions](/source/Correlative_conjunction), e.g.

- *Þā ic hām ēode, þā slēp ic.*

- (word-for-word) "Then I home went, then slept I."

- (translated) "When I went home, I slept."

The word order usually distinguished the subordinate clause (with verb-final order) from the main clause (with [verb-second](/source/Verb-second) word order).

The equivalents of "who, when, where" were used only as [interrogative pronouns](/source/Interrogative_pronoun) and [indefinite pronouns](/source/Indefinite_pronoun), as in [Ancient Greek](/source/Ancient_Greek) and [Sanskrit](/source/Sanskrit).

Besides *þā ... þā ...*, other [correlative conjunctions](/source/Correlative_conjunction) occurred, often in pairs of identical words, e.g.:

- *þǣr X, þǣr Y*: "Where X, Y"

- *þanon X, þanon Y*: "Whence (from where/wherefrom) X, Y"

- *þider X, þider Y*: "Whither (to where/whereto) X, Y"

- *þēah (þe) X, þēah Y*: "Although X, Y"

- *þenden X, þenden Y*: "While X, Y"

- *þonne X, þonne Y*: "Whenever X, Y"

- *þæs X, þæs Y*: "As/after/since X, Y"

- *þȳ X, þȳ Y*: "The more X, the more Y"

## Phonology

Main article: [Old English phonology](/source/Old_English_phonology)

The [phonology](/source/Phonology) of Old English is necessarily somewhat speculative, since it is preserved purely as a [written language](/source/Written_language). Nevertheless, there is a very large [corpus](/source/Text_corpus) of Old English, and the written language apparently indicates phonological [alternations](/source/Alternation_(linguistics)) quite faithfully, so it is not difficult to draw certain conclusions about the nature of [Old English phonology](/source/Old_English_phonology).

## See also

- [Middle English](/source/Middle_English)

- [Old English phonology](/source/Old_English_phonology)

## Notes

1. **[^](#cite_ref-15)** [Compare](/source/Cf.) their descendents [*fairer*](https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/fairer#Etymology_1) and [*fairest*](https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/fairest#English) in [Modern English](/source/Modern_English), as in "who is the fairest of them all?"

1. **[^](#cite_ref-20)** Although often referred to simply as *gender*, this is distinct from grammatical gender.

## References

1. **[^](#cite_ref-1)** Cercignani, Fausto (1980). "Early 'Umlaut' Phenomena in the Germanic Languages". *Language*. **56** (1): 126–136. [doi](/source/Doi_(identifier)):[10.2307/412645](https://doi.org/10.2307%2F412645). [JSTOR](/source/JSTOR_(identifier)) [412645](https://www.jstor.org/stable/412645).

1. **[^](#cite_ref-2)** Quirk, Randolph; [Wrenn, Charles Leslie](/source/Charles_Leslie_Wrenn) (1957). *An Old English Grammar*. London: Methuen and Co.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-3)** Peter S. Baker (2003). ["Pronouns"](https://web.archive.org/web/20150911000749/http://www.wmich.edu/medieval/resources/IOE/inflpron.html). *The Electronic Introduction to Old English*. Oxford: [Blackwell](/source/Wiley-Blackwell). Archived from [the original](http://www.wmich.edu/medieval/resources/IOE/inflpron.html) on September 11, 2015.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-4)** Curzan, Anne (2003). *Gender Shifts in the History of English*. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 94.{{[cite book](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Cite_book)}}: CS1 maint: publisher location ([link](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:CS1_maint:_publisher_location))

1. **[^](#cite_ref-5)** Curzan, Anne (2003). *Gender Shifts in the History of English*. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 62.{{[cite book](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Cite_book)}}: CS1 maint: publisher location ([link](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:CS1_maint:_publisher_location))

1. **[^](#cite_ref-6)** Quirk, Randolph; Wrenn, C. L. (1994). *An Old English Grammar*. De Kalb: Northern Illinois University Press. p. 75.{{[cite book](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Cite_book)}}: CS1 maint: publisher location ([link](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:CS1_maint:_publisher_location))

1. **[^](#cite_ref-7)** Dolberg, Florian (2019). *Agreement in Language Contact: Gender Development in the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle*. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. p. 22.{{[cite book](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Cite_book)}}: CS1 maint: publisher location ([link](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:CS1_maint:_publisher_location))

1. **[^](#cite_ref-8)** Middeke, Kirsten (2021-11-04). [*The Old English Case System: Case and Argument Structure Constructions*](https://brill.com/view/title/56925). Brill. [doi](/source/Doi_(identifier)):[10.1163/9789004435278](https://doi.org/10.1163%2F9789004435278). [ISBN](/source/ISBN_(identifier)) [978-90-04-43527-8](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/978-90-04-43527-8).

1. ^ [***a***](#cite_ref-:0_9-0) [***b***](#cite_ref-:0_9-1) Taylor, Roxanne (2022-10-04). ["Lexical and functional adpositions: the view from of in Old and present-day English"](https://www.glossa-journal.org/article/id/5895/). *Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics*. **7** (1). [doi](/source/Doi_(identifier)):[10.16995/glossa.5895](https://doi.org/10.16995%2Fglossa.5895). [ISSN](/source/ISSN_(identifier)) [2397-1835](https://search.worldcat.org/issn/2397-1835). [S2CID](/source/S2CID_(identifier)) [252075813](https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:252075813).

1. **[^](#cite_ref-FOOTNOTEHogg201115_10-0)** [Hogg 2011](#CITEREFHogg2011), p. 15.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-11)** Steins, Carl (1998). "Against Arbitrary Features in Inflection: Old English Declension Classes". In Kehrein, Wolfgang; Wiese, Richard (eds.). *Phonology and Morphology of the Germanic Languages*. Tübingen: Niemeyer. p. 247.{{[cite encyclopedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Cite_encyclopedia)}}: CS1 maint: publisher location ([link](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:CS1_maint:_publisher_location))

1. ^ [***a***](#cite_ref-FOOTNOTERingeTaylor2014264_12-0) [***b***](#cite_ref-FOOTNOTERingeTaylor2014264_12-1) [Ringe & Taylor 2014](#CITEREFRingeTaylor2014), p. 264.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-FOOTNOTEHogg2011168_13-0)** [Hogg 2011](#CITEREFHogg2011), p. 168.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-FOOTNOTEHogg2011164_14-0)** [Hogg 2011](#CITEREFHogg2011), p. 164.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-16)** Sommerer, Lotte (2018). *Article Emergence in Old English*. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. p. 284.{{[cite book](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Cite_book)}}: CS1 maint: publisher location ([link](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:CS1_maint:_publisher_location))

1. **[^](#cite_ref-17)** Flamme, Julius (1885). *Syntax der Blickling-Homilien* (Thesis). University of Bonn. pp. 5–27.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-18)** Wülfing, Johann Ernst (1894). *Die Syntax in den Werken Alfreds des Grossen*. Bonn: Hanstein. pp. 278–85.{{[cite book](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Cite_book)}}: CS1 maint: publisher location ([link](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:CS1_maint:_publisher_location))

1. **[^](#cite_ref-FOOTNOTEMitchell1985134_19-0)** [Mitchell 1985](#CITEREFMitchell1985), p. 134.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-FOOTNOTEHogg2011258_21-0)** [Hogg 2011](#CITEREFHogg2011), p. 258.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-FOOTNOTEHogg2011279_22-0)** [Hogg 2011](#CITEREFHogg2011), p. 279.

## Sources

- Hogg, Richard M. (2011). *A Grammar of Old English: Morphology*. Vol. 2. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

- Mitchell, Bruce (1985). *Old English Syntax*. Oxford: Oxford University Press.{{[cite book](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Cite_book)}}: CS1 maint: publisher location ([link](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:CS1_maint:_publisher_location))

- Moore, Samuel; Knott, Thomas A. (1958) [1919]. Hulbert, James R. (ed.). *The Elements of Old English* (10th ed.). Ann Arbor, Michigan: George Wahr Publishing Co.

- Ringe, Don; Taylor, Ann (2014). *The Development of Old English*. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

- The Magic Sheet, one page color PDF summarizing Old English declension, from Peter S. Baker, inspired by Moore and Marckwardt's 1951 *Historical Outlines of English Sounds and Inflections*

- J. Bosworth & T.N. Toller, An Anglo-Saxon dictionary: Germanic Lexicon Project

## Further reading

- Brunner, Karl (1965). *Altenglische Grammatik (nach der angelsächsischen Grammatik von Eduard Sievers neubearbeitet)* (3rd ed.). Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.

- Campbell, A. (1959). *Old English Grammar*. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

- Mitchell, Bruce & Robinson, Fred (2001) *A Guide to Old English*; 6th ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing [ISBN](/source/ISBN_(identifier)) [0-631-22636-2](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/0-631-22636-2)

- Quirk, Randolph; & Wrenn, C. L. (1957). *An Old English Grammar* (2nd ed.) London: Methuen.

v t e Grammars of the world's languages Phonologies Orthographies Grammars Adjectives Determiners Nouns Prepositions Pronouns Verbs Natural Afroasiatic Arabic Levantine Central Atlas Tamazight Hebrew Historical Kabyle Somali Tigrinya Ugaritic Altaic (sprachbund) Turkic Kazakh Kyrgyz Tatar Turkish Turkmen Uyghur Uzbek Yakut Japonic Japanese Classical Okinawan Hachijō Other Evenki Korean Mongolian Austroasiatic Khmer Vietnamese Santali Austronesian Cebuano Hawaiian Ilocano Malay Tagalog Dravidian Kannada Malayalam Tamil Telugu Indo-European Baltic Latvian Lithuanian Celtic Breton Cornish Irish Old Manx Scottish Gaelic Welsh colloquial literary Germanic Afrikaans Danish Dutch English Old Faroese German Icelandic Norwegian Old Norse Ripuarian Swedish West Frisian Yiddish Indo-Aryan Bengali Bhojpuri Gujarati Hindustani Maithili Marathi Nepali Odia Punjabi Sanskrit Vedic Iranian Kurdish Sorani Pashto Persian Tajik Italic Catalan Dalmatian French Istro-Romanian Italian Latin Lombard Eastern Western Portuguese Romanian Spanish Venetian Slavic Belarusian Bulgarian Czech Kashubian Macedonian Old Church Slavonic Polish Russian Rusyn Silesian Serbo-Croatian Slovak Slovene Slovincian Ukrainian Other Albanian Greek Ancient Koine Hittite Kartvelian Georgian Laz Mingrelian Kra–Dai Has Hlai Lao Thai Native American Algic Massachusett Munsee Ojibwe Na-Dene Navajo Tlingit Uto-Aztecan Nahuatl Classical Nawat Other Cherokee Inuit Lushootseed Miskito Otomi Niger–Congo Fula Pular Herero Sotho Swahili Zulu Northwest Caucasian Abkhaz Adyghe Kabardian Sino-Tibetan Burmese Chinese Classical Cantonese Dzongkha Kokborok (Tripuri) Meitei (Manipuri) Mizo Tibetan Uralic Estonian Finnish Hungarian Ingrian Komi Livonian Meänkieli Udmurt Other American Sign Language Basque Ubykh Constructed artistic Klingon Naʼvi Quenya auxiliary Esperanto Interlingua Interlingue Lingua Franca Nova Other Lojban

Authority control databases National United States Israel Other Yale LUX

---
Adapted from the Wikipedia article [Old English grammar](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_English_grammar) by Wikipedia contributors ([contributor history](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_English_grammar?action=history)). Available under [Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Changes may have been made.