# Nuclear holocaust

> Mediated Wiki article. Canonical URL: https://mediated.wiki/source/Nuclear_holocaust
> Markdown URL: https://mediated.wiki/source/Nuclear_holocaust.md
> Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_holocaust
> Source revision: 1353758413
> License: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/)

Scenario of civilization collapse or human extinction  by nuclear weapons

Mushroom cloud from the 1954 explosion of [Castle Bravo](/source/Castle_Bravo), the largest nuclear weapon detonated by the U.S.

A **nuclear holocaust**, also known as a **nuclear apocalypse**, **nuclear annihilation**, **nuclear armageddon**, or **atomic holocaust**, is a [theoretical scenario](/source/Futures_studies) where the mass detonation of [nuclear weapons](/source/Nuclear_weapons) causes widespread destruction and [radioactive](/source/Radioactive) fallout, with global consequences. Such a scenario envisages large parts of the Earth becoming uninhabitable due to the effects of [nuclear warfare](/source/Nuclear_warfare), potentially causing the [collapse of civilization](/source/Societal_collapse), the [extinction of humanity](/source/Extinction_of_humanity), or [the termination of most biological life on Earth](/source/Extinction_event).[1]

Besides the immediate destruction of cities by nuclear blasts, the potential aftermath of a nuclear war could involve [firestorms](/source/Firestorm), a [nuclear winter](/source/Nuclear_winter), widespread [radiation sickness](/source/Acute_radiation_syndrome) from [fallout](/source/Nuclear_fallout), and/or the temporary (if not permanent) loss of much modern technology due to [electromagnetic pulses](/source/Electromagnetic_pulse). Some scientists, such as [Alan Robock](/source/Alan_Robock), have speculated that a thermonuclear war could result in the end of modern civilization on [Earth](/source/Earth), in part due to a long-lasting nuclear winter. According to modern climate models, the average temperature of Earth following a full thermonuclear war would fall for several years by 7 to 8 °C (13 to 15 degrees Fahrenheit) on average.[2]

Early [Cold War](/source/Cold_War)-era studies suggested that billions of humans would survive the immediate effects of nuclear blasts and radiation following a global thermonuclear war.[3][4][5][6] The [International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War](/source/International_Physicians_for_the_Prevention_of_Nuclear_War) believe that nuclear war could indirectly contribute to human extinction via secondary effects, including environmental consequences, [societal breakdown](/source/Societal_collapse), and economic collapse.

The threat of a nuclear holocaust plays an important role in the [anti-nuclear movement](/source/Anti-nuclear_movement) and the development of [popular perception of nuclear weapons](/source/Nuclear_weapons_in_popular_culture). It features in the security concept of [mutually assured destruction](/source/Mutual_assured_destruction) (MAD) and is a common scenario in [survivalism](/source/Survivalism). Nuclear holocaust is a [common feature in literature and film](/source/List_of_nuclear_holocaust_fiction), especially in [speculative genres](/source/Speculative_fiction) such as [science fiction](/source/Science_fiction), [dystopian](/source/Dystopia) and [post-apocalyptic fiction](/source/Apocalyptic_and_post-apocalyptic_fiction).[7]

Nuclear weapons Background Nuclear explosion History Warfare Design Testing Delivery Yield Effects Humanitarian Workers Ethics Arsenals Target selection Arms race Blackmail Deterrence Espionage No first use Proliferation Disarmament Sharing Strategy Terrorism Umbrella Opposition Winter Pax Atomica Nuclear triad Nuclear-armed states NPT recognized United States Russia United Kingdom France China Others India Israel (undeclared) Pakistan North Korea Former South Africa Belarus Kazakhstan Ukraine v t e

## Etymology and usage

The English word "holocaust", derived from the [Greek](/source/Greek_language) term "holokaustos" meaning "completely burnt", refers to great destruction and loss of life, especially by fire.[8][9]

One early use of the word "holocaust" to describe an imagined nuclear destruction appears in Reginald Glossop's 1926 novel *The Orphan of Space*: "Moscow ... beneath them ... a crash like a crack of Doom! The echoes of this Holocaust rumbled and rolled ... a distinct smell of sulphur ... atomic destruction."[10] In the novel, an atomic weapon is planted in the office of the Soviet dictator, who, with German help and Chinese mercenaries, is preparing the takeover of Western Europe.

More broadly, the use of nuclear weapons, particularly [their testing](/source/Nuclear_weapons_testing), has been discussed as [genocide](/source/Genocide), [ecocide](/source/Ecocide), [environmental racism](/source/Environmental_racism), nuclear imperialism, and colonialism by [anti-nuclear activists](/source/Anti-nuclear_movement).[11][12][13]

## Likelihood of nuclear war

See also: [World War III § Historical close calls](/source/World_War_III#Historical_close_calls)

Large stockpile with global range (dark blue), smaller stockpile with global range (medium blue), small stockpile with regional range (light blue)

As of 2021, humanity has about 13,410 nuclear weapons, thousands of which are on [hair-trigger alert](/source/Prompt_launch).[14][15] While stockpiles have been on the decline following the end of the Cold War, every [nuclear country](/source/List_of_states_with_nuclear_weapons) is currently undergoing modernization of its nuclear arsenal.[16][17][18] The *Bulletin* advanced their symbolic [Doomsday Clock](/source/Doomsday_Clock) in 2015, citing among other factors "a nuclear arms race resulting from modernization of huge arsenals".[19] In January 2020, it was moved forward to 100 seconds before midnight.[20] In 2023, it was moved forward to 90 seconds before midnight. In 2025, it was moved to 89 seconds before midnight. In January 2026, the clock moved to 85 seconds before midnight.[21]

[John F. Kennedy](/source/John_F._Kennedy) estimated the probability of the [Cuban Missile Crisis](/source/Cuban_Missile_Crisis) escalating to nuclear conflict as between 33% and 50%.[22][23]

In a poll of experts at the Global Catastrophic Risk Conference in Oxford (17–20 July 2008), the [Future of Humanity Institute](/source/Future_of_Humanity_Institute) estimated the probability of complete human extinction by nuclear weapons at 1% within the century, the probability of 1 billion dead at 10% and the probability of 1 million dead at 30%.[24] These results reflect the median opinions of a group of experts, rather than a probabilistic model; the actual values may be much lower or higher.

Scientists have argued that even a small-scale nuclear war between two countries, such as India and Pakistan, could have devastating global consequences and such local conflicts are more likely than full-scale nuclear war.[25][26][27]

## Moral importance of human extinction risk

Main article: [Human extinction § Ethics](/source/Human_extinction#Ethics)

In his book *[Reasons and Persons](/source/Reasons_and_Persons)*, philosopher [Derek Parfit](/source/Derek_Parfit) posed the following question:[28]

Compare three outcomes:

1. Peace.

1. A nuclear war that kills 99% of the world's existing population.

1. A nuclear war that kills 100%.

(2) would be worse than (1), and (3) would be worse than (2). Which is the greater of these two differences?

He continues that "Most people believe that the greater difference is between (1) and (2). I believe that the difference between (2) and (3) is *very much* greater." Thus, he argues, even if it would be bad if massive numbers of humans died, human extinction would itself be much worse because it prevents the existence of all future generations. And given the magnitude of the calamity were the human race to become extinct, [Nick Bostrom](/source/Nick_Bostrom) argues that there is an overwhelming moral imperative to reduce even small risks of [human extinction](/source/Human_extinction).[29]

## Likelihood of complete human extinction

See also: [Cobalt bomb](/source/Cobalt_bomb) and [Nuclear winter](/source/Nuclear_winter)

The United States and [Soviet Union](/source/Soviet_Union) nuclear stockpiles, in [total number of nuclear bombs/warheads in existence](/source/Historical_nuclear_weapons_stockpiles_and_nuclear_tests_by_country) throughout the [Cold War](/source/Cold_War) and post-Cold War era

Many scholars have posited that a global thermonuclear war with Cold War-era stockpiles, or even with the current smaller stockpiles, may lead to human extinction. This position was bolstered when nuclear winter was first conceptualized and modelled in 1983. However, models from the past decade consider total extinction very unlikely, and suggest parts of the world would remain habitable.[30] Technically the risk may not be zero, as the climatic effects of nuclear war are uncertain and could theoretically be larger, but also smaller, than current models suggest. There could also be indirect risks, such as a societal collapse following nuclear war that can make humanity much more vulnerable to other existential threats.[31]

A related area of inquiry is: if a future nuclear arms race someday leads to larger stockpiles or more dangerous nuclear weapons than existed at the height of the Cold War, at what point could war with such weapons result in human extinction?[31] Physicist [Leo Szilard](/source/Leo_Szilard) warned in the 1950s that a deliberate [doomsday device](/source/Doomsday_device) could be constructed by surrounding powerful hydrogen bombs with a massive amount of cobalt-60. Cobalt-60 has a half-life of five years, and its global fallout might, some physicists have posited, be able to clear out all human life via lethal radiation intensity. The main motivation for building a cobalt bomb in this scenario is its reduced expense compared with the arsenals possessed by superpowers; such a doomsday device does not need to be launched before detonation and thus does not require expensive missile delivery systems, and the hydrogen bombs do not need to be miniaturized for delivery via missile. The system for triggering it might have to be completely automated, in order for the deterrent to be effective. A modern twist might be to also lace the bombs with aerosols designed to exacerbate nuclear winter. A major caveat is that nuclear fallout transfer between the northern and southern hemispheres is expected to be small; unless a bomb detonates in each hemisphere, the effect of a bomb detonated in one hemisphere on the other is diminished.[32]

Further information: [Human extinction § Probability](/source/Human_extinction#Probability)

## Effects of nuclear war

[Castle Bravo](/source/Castle_Bravo) nuclear test

Part of a series on Pollution Air pollution from a factory Air Acid rain Air quality index Atmospheric dispersion modeling Chlorofluorocarbon Combustion Exhaust gas Haze Household air pollution Global dimming Global distillation Indoor air quality Non-exhaust emissions Ozone depletion Particulate matter Persistent organic pollutant Smog Soot Volatile organic compound Biological Biological hazard Genetic Illegal logging Introduced species Invasive species Digital Information Effects of violence in mass media Electromagnetic Light Ecological Overillumination Radio spectrum Natural Ozone Radium and radon in the environment Volcanic ash Wildfire Noise Transportation Health effects from noise Marine mammals and sonar Noise barrier Noise control Soundproofing Radiation Actinides Bioremediation Depleted uranium Nuclear fission Nuclear fallout Plutonium Poisoning Radioactivity Uranium Radioactive waste Soil Agricultural Land degradation Bioremediation Defecation Electrical resistance heating Illegal mining Soil guideline values Phytoremediation Solid waste Advertising mail Biodegradable waste Brown waste Electronic waste Food waste Green waste Hazardous waste Industrial waste Landfill Litter Mining Municipal solid waste Nanomaterials Plastic Packaging waste Post-consumer waste Waste management Space Space debris Thermal Urban heat island Visual Air travel Advertising clutter Overhead power lines Traffic signs Urban blight Vandalism War Chemical warfare Herbicidal warfare Agent Orange Nuclear holocaust Nuclear fallout Nuclear famine Nuclear winter Scorched earth Unexploded ordnance War and environmental law Water Agricultural wastewater Biosolids Diseases Eutrophication Firewater Freshwater Groundwater Hypoxia Industrial wastewater Marine Monitoring Nonpoint source Nutrient Ocean acidification Oil spill Pharmaceuticals Freshwater salinization Septic tanks Sewage Shipping Sludge Stagnation Sulfur water Surface runoff Turbidity Urban runoff Water quality Wastewater Topics History Pollutants Heavy metals Paint Misc Area source Brain health and pollution Debris Dust Garbology Legacy Midden Point source Technofossil Waste Toxic Lists Diseases Law by country Most polluted cities Least polluted cities by PM2.5 Treaties Most polluted rivers Categories By country Environment portal Ecology portal v t e

Historically, it has been difficult to estimate the total number of deaths resulting from a global nuclear exchange because scientists are continually discovering new effects of nuclear weapons, and also revising existing models.

Early reports considered direct effects from nuclear blast and radiation and indirect effects from economic, social, and political disruption. In a 1979 report for the U.S. Senate, the [Office of Technology Assessment](/source/Office_of_Technology_Assessment) estimated casualties under different scenarios. For a full-scale [countervalue](/source/Countervalue)/[counterforce](/source/Counterforce) nuclear exchange between the U.S. and the Soviet Union, they predicted U.S. deaths from 35 to 77 percent (70 million to 160 million dead at the time), and Soviet deaths from 20 to 40 percent of the population.[33]

Although this report was made when nuclear stockpiles were at much higher levels than they are today, it also was made before the risk of nuclear winter was first theorized in the early 1980s. Additionally, it did not consider other secondary effects, such as electromagnetic pulses (EMP), and the ramifications they would have on modern technology and industry.

### Nuclear winter

Main article: [Nuclear winter](/source/Nuclear_winter)

In the early 1980s, scientists began to consider the effects of smoke and soot arising from burning wood, plastics, and petroleum fuels in nuclear-devastated cities. It was speculated that the intense heat would carry these particulates to extremely high altitudes where they could drift for weeks and block out all but a fraction of the sun's light.[34] A landmark 1983 study by the so-called TTAPS team ([Richard P. Turco](/source/Richard_P._Turco), [Owen Toon](/source/Owen_Toon), Thomas P. Ackerman, [James B. Pollack](/source/James_B._Pollack) and [Carl Sagan](/source/Carl_Sagan)) was the first to model these effects and coined the term "nuclear winter."[35]

More recent studies make use of modern global circulation models and far greater computer power than was available for the 1980s studies. A 2007 study examined the consequences of a global nuclear war involving moderate to large portions of the current global arsenal.[36] The study found cooling by about 12–20 °C in much of the core farming regions of the US, Canada, Europe, Russia and China and as much as 35 °C in parts of Russia for the first two summer growing seasons. The changes they found were also much longer-lasting than previously thought, because their new model better represented entry of soot aerosols in the upper stratosphere, where precipitation does not occur, and therefore clearance was on the order of 10 years.[26] In addition, they found that global cooling caused a weakening of the global hydrological cycle, reducing global [precipitation](/source/Precipitation_(meteorology)) by about 45%.

The authors did not discuss the implications for agriculture in depth, but noted that a 1986 study which assumed no food production for a year projected that "most of the people on the planet would run out of food and starve to death by then" and commented that their own results show that, "This period of no food production needs to be extended by many years, making the impacts of nuclear winter even worse than previously thought."[36]

In contrast to the above investigations of global nuclear conflicts, studies have shown that even small-scale, regional nuclear conflicts could disrupt the global climate for a decade or more. In a regional nuclear conflict scenario where two opposing nations in the [subtropics](/source/Subtropics) would each use 50 [Hiroshima](/source/Atomic_bombings_of_Hiroshima_and_Nagasaki)-sized nuclear weapons (about 15 kilotons each) on major populated centres, the researchers estimated as much as five million tons of soot would be released, which would produce a cooling of several degrees over large areas of [North America](/source/North_America) and [Eurasia](/source/Eurasia), including most of the grain-growing regions.[37][25][26] The cooling would last for years, and according to the research, could be "catastrophic". Additionally, the analysis showed a 10% drop in average global precipitation, with the largest losses in the low latitudes due to failure of the monsoons.

Regional nuclear conflicts could also inflict significant damage to the [ozone layer](/source/Ozone_layer). A 2008 study found that a regional nuclear weapons exchange could create a near-global [ozone hole](/source/Ozone_hole), triggering human health problems and impacting agriculture for at least a decade.[38] This effect on the ozone would result from heat absorption by soot in the upper stratosphere, which would modify wind currents and draw in ozone-destroying nitrogen oxides. These high temperatures and nitrogen oxides would reduce ozone to the same dangerous levels that are experienced below the ozone hole above Antarctica every spring.[26]

### Nuclear famine

Main article: [Nuclear famine](/source/Nuclear_famine)

It is difficult to estimate the number of casualties that would result from nuclear winter, but it is likely that the primary effect would be global famine (known as nuclear famine), wherein mass starvation occurs due to disrupted agricultural production and distribution.[39] In 2013 and 2022 reports, the [International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War](/source/International_Physicians_for_the_Prevention_of_Nuclear_War) (IPPNW) voiced concerns that more than two billion people, about a third of the world's population, would be at risk of starvation in the event of a regional nuclear exchange between India and Pakistan, or by the use of even a small proportion of nuclear arms held by America and Russia.[40][41] Several independent studies[*[citation needed](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Citation_needed)*] show corroborated conclusions that agricultural outputs would be significantly reduced for years by climatic changes driven by nuclear wars. Reduction of food supply would be further exacerbated by rising [food prices](/source/Food_prices), affecting hundreds of millions of vulnerable people, especially in the poorest nations of the world.

According to a peer-reviewed study published in the journal *[Nature Food](/source/Nature_Food)* in August 2022,[27] a full-scale nuclear war between the U.S. and Russia might kill 360 million people directly and more than 5 billion people might die as a consequence from [starvation](/source/Starvation) due to soot created by firestorms after nuclear bombing. More than 2 billion people were projected to die as a consequence from a smaller-scale nuclear war between India and Pakistan. In the event of a nuclear war between Russia and the United States, 99% of the people in the United States, Russia, Europe, and China would die.[42]

### Electromagnetic pulse

See also: [Nuclear electromagnetic pulse](/source/Nuclear_electromagnetic_pulse) and [High-altitude nuclear explosion](/source/High-altitude_nuclear_explosion)

An [electromagnetic pulse](/source/Electromagnetic_pulse) (EMP) is a burst of electromagnetic radiation. Nuclear explosions create a pulse of electromagnetic radiation called a nuclear EMP or NEMP. Such EMP interference is known to be generally disruptive or damaging to electronic equipment.[43]

By disabling electronics and their functioning, an EMP would disable hospitals, water treatment facilities, food storage facilities, and all electronic forms of communication, and thereby threaten key aspects of the modern human condition.[*[citation needed](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Citation_needed)*] Certain EMP attacks could lead to a large loss of power for months or years.[44] Currently, failures of the power grid are dealt with using support from the outside. In the event of an EMP attack, such support would not exist and all damaged components, devices, and electronics would need to be completely replaced.

In 2013, the US House of Representatives considered the "Secure High-voltage Infrastructure for Electricity from Lethal Damage Act" that would provide surge protection for some 300 large transformers around the country.[45] The problem of protecting civilian infrastructure from electromagnetic pulse has also been intensively studied throughout the European Union, and in particular by the United Kingdom.[46] While precautions have been taken, James Woolsey and the EMP Commission suggested that an EMP is the most significant threat to the U.S.[44][47]

The risk of an EMP, either through solar or atmospheric activity or enemy attack, while not dismissed, was suggested to be overblown by the news media in a commentary in *[Physics Today](/source/Physics_Today)*.[48] Instead, the weapons from rogue states were still too small and uncoordinated to cause a massive EMP, underground infrastructure is sufficiently protected, and there will be enough warning time from continuous solar observatories like [SOHO](/source/Solar_and_Heliospheric_Observatory) to protect surface transformers should a devastating solar storm be detected.[48]

### Nuclear fallout

Further information: [Nuclear fallout](/source/Nuclear_fallout)

One part of nuclear holocaust is worldwide fallout; such [global fallout](/source/Global_fallout) has happened as a result of past [nuclear weapons testing](/source/Nuclear_weapons_testing), numbering in the thousands, with many[*[clarification needed](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Please_clarify)*] being atmospheric. A fast increase of global [background radiation](/source/Background_radiation), peaking in 1963 (the [Bomb pulse](/source/Bomb_pulse)) urged, among other things, states to sign [bans on nuclear weapons testing](/source/Nuclear_weapons_testing#Treaties_against_testing). The global fallout has caused deaths, for example through increased cancer rates, of about 2.4 million people globally according to 2020 estimates, while older placed them in the hundreds of thousands.[49]

Nuclear fallout is the residual radioactive dust and ash propelled into the upper atmosphere following a nuclear explosion.[50] Fallout is usually limited to the immediate area, and can only spread for hundreds of kilometers from the explosion site if the explosion is high enough in the atmosphere. Fallout may get [entrained](/source/Entrainment_(meteorology)) with the products of a [pyrocumulus](/source/Pyrocumulus) cloud and fall as black rain[51] (rain darkened by soot and other particulates).

This radioactive dust, usually consisting of [fission products](/source/Fission_product) mixed with bystanding atoms that are [neutron activated by exposure](/source/Neutron_activation), is a highly dangerous kind of [radioactive contamination](/source/Radioactive_contamination). The main radiation hazard from fallout is due to short-lived radionuclides external to the body.[52] While most of the particles carried by nuclear fallout decay rapidly, some radioactive particles will have half-lives of seconds to a few months. Some radioactive isotopes, like [strontium-90](/source/Strontium-90) and [caesium-137](/source/Caesium-137), are very long-lived and will create radioactive hot spots for up to 5 years after the initial explosion.[52] Fallout and black rain may contaminate waterways, agriculture, and soil. Contact with radioactive materials can lead to radiation poisoning through external exposure or accidental consumption. In acute doses over a short amount of time radiation will lead to prodromal syndrome, bone marrow death, central nervous system death and gastrointestinal death.[53] Over longer periods of exposure to radiation, cancer becomes the main health risk. Long-term radiation exposure can also lead to in utero effects on human development and transgenerational genetic damage.[53][54]

## Origins and analysis of extinction hypotheses

As a result of the extensive [nuclear fallout](/source/Nuclear_fallout) of the 1954 [Castle Bravo](/source/Castle_Bravo) nuclear detonation, author [Nevil Shute](/source/Nevil_Shute) wrote the popular novel *[On the Beach](/source/On_the_Beach_(novel))*, released in 1957. In this novel, so much fallout is generated in a nuclear war that all human life is extinguished. However, the premise that all of humanity would die following a nuclear war and only the "cockroaches would survive" is critically dealt with in the 1988 book *[Would the Insects Inherit the Earth and Other Subjects of Concern to Those Who Worry About Nuclear War](/source/Philip_J._Dolan#Unclassified_publications)*, by nuclear weapons expert [Philip J. Dolan](/source/Philip_J._Dolan). Based upon studies on the effects of the massive hydrogen bombs at the [Bikini Atoll](/source/Bikini_Atoll) and [Eniwetok Atoll](/source/Eniwetok_Atoll), Dolan refutes the theory that some small plant specimens and bacteria would be the only lifeforms to survive an all-out nuclear war. All the mentioned tests witnessed full recovery of the local [ecosystem](/source/Ecosystem).[55]

In 1982, [nuclear disarmament](/source/Nuclear_disarmament) activist [Jonathan Schell](/source/Jonathan_Schell) published *[The Fate of the Earth](/source/The_Fate_of_the_Earth)*, which is regarded by many to be the first carefully argued presentation that concluded that extinction is a significant possibility from nuclear war. However, Brian Martin calls the conclusions "quite dubious".[56] The impetus for Schell's work, according to physicist Brian Martin, was:

The implicit premise [...] that if people are not taking action on the issue, they must not perceive it as threatening enough. Perhaps if the thought of 500 million people dying in a nuclear war is not enough to stimulate action, then the thought of extinction will. Indeed, Schell explicitly advocates use of the fear of extinction as the basis for inspiring the "complete rearrangement of world politics" (p. 221)[56]

The belief in "overkill" is also commonly encountered, with an example being the following statement made by nuclear disarmament activist [Philip Noel-Baker](/source/Philip_Noel-Baker) in 1971: "Both the US and the Soviet Union now possess nuclear stockpiles large enough to exterminate mankind three or four – some say ten – times over". Brian Martin suggested that the origin of this belief was from "crude linear extrapolations" of the bombing of Hiroshima. He said that if the bomb dropped on Hiroshima had been 1,000 times as powerful, it could not have killed 1,000 times as many people.[5] Similarly, it is common to see stated that the combined explosive energy released in the entirety of [World War II](/source/World_War_II) was about 3 megatons, while a nuclear war with warhead stockpiles at Cold War highs would release 6000 WWII's of explosive energy.[57] An estimate for the necessary amount of fallout to begin to have the potential of causing human extinction is regarded by physicist and disarmament activist [Joseph Rotblat](/source/Joseph_Rotblat) to be 10 to 100 times the megatonnage in nuclear arsenals as they stood in 1976; however, with the world megatonnage decreasing since the Cold War ended this possibility remains hypothetical.[5]

The massive use and deployment of nuclear weapons are commonly theorized to yield enough global destructive potential to render large parts of the Earth uninhabitable.

According to the 1980 [United Nations](/source/United_Nations) report *General and Complete Disarmament: Comprehensive Study on Nuclear Weapons: Report of the Secretary-General*, it was estimated that there were a total of about 40,000 [nuclear warheads in existence](/source/Historical_nuclear_weapons_stockpiles_and_nuclear_tests_by_country) at that time, with a potential combined explosive yield of approximately 13,000 [megatons](/source/TNT_equivalent).

By comparison – in the [timeline of volcanism on Earth](/source/Timeline_of_volcanism_on_Earth) – the [1815 eruption](/source/1815_eruption_of_Mount_Tambora) of [Mount Tambora](/source/Mount_Tambora) exploded with a force of roughly 30,000 megatons,[58] and ejected 160 km3 (38 cu mi) of mostly rock and [tephra](/source/Tephra),[59] which included 120 million [tonnes](/source/Tonne) of [sulfur dioxide](/source/Sulfur_dioxide) as [an upper estimate](/source/Mount_Tambora#Global_effects), turning 1816 into the "[year without a summer](/source/Year_Without_a_Summer)" due to the levels of [global dimming](/source/Global_dimming) [sulfate](/source/Sulfate) aerosols and ash expelled.[60] The larger [Mount Toba eruption](/source/Lake_Toba#Major_eruption), which occurred approximately 74,000 years ago, produced an estimated 2,800 km3 (670 cu mi) of tephra[61] and 6,000 million tonnes (6,600 million short tons) of sulfur dioxide,[62][63] with a possible explosion force of 20,000,000 megatons (Mt) of TNT, forming [Lake Toba](/source/Lake_Toba) and reducing the human population to mere tens of thousands. The [Chicxulub impact](/source/Chicxulub_impact), connected with the [extinction of the dinosaurs](/source/Extinction_of_the_dinosaurs), corresponds to at least 70,000,000 Mt of energy, which is roughly 7000 times the combined maximum arsenal of the US and Soviet Union.

Comparisons with [supervolcanos](/source/Supervolcanos) are more misleading than helpful due to the different [aerosols](/source/Aerosol) released, the likely [air burst](/source/Air_burst) fuzing height of nuclear weapons and the globally scattered location of these potential nuclear detonations all being in contrast to the singular and subterranean nature of a supervolcanic eruption.[64] Moreover, assuming the entire world stockpile of weapons were grouped together, it would be difficult due to the [nuclear fratricide](/source/Nuclear_fratricide) effect to ensure the individual weapons would detonate all at once. Nonetheless, many people believe that a full-scale nuclear war would result, through the nuclear winter effect, in the [extinction of the human species](/source/Human_extinction), though not all analysts agree on the assumptions put into these nuclear winter models.[3]

## See also

- [Second Cold War](/source/Second_Cold_War) – Term referring to heightened tensions in the 21st century

- [Environmental impact of war](/source/Environmental_impact_of_war) – Environmental problems caused by warfare

- [Global catastrophic risk](/source/Global_catastrophic_risk) – Hypothetical global-scale disaster risk

- [Human extinction](/source/Human_extinction) – End of the human species

- [List of nuclear holocaust fiction](/source/List_of_nuclear_holocaust_fiction)

- [Nuclear anxiety](/source/Nuclear_anxiety) – Fear of nuclear war

- [Nuclear terrorism](/source/Nuclear_terrorism) – Terrorism involving nuclear material or weapons

- [Silurian hypothesis](/source/Silurian_hypothesis) – Thought experiment to assess ability to detect evidence of a prior advanced civilization

- [World War III](/source/World_War_III) – Hypothetical future global conflict

## References

1. **[^](#cite_ref-x978_1-0)** Fee, Elizabeth; Brown, Theodore M. (2004). ["Dispelling the Specter of Nuclear Holocaust"](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1449821). *American Journal of Public Health*. **94** (1): 36. [doi](/source/Doi_(identifier)):[10.2105/AJPH.94.1.36](https://doi.org/10.2105%2FAJPH.94.1.36). [ISSN](/source/ISSN_(identifier)) [0090-0036](https://search.worldcat.org/issn/0090-0036). [PMC](/source/PMC_(identifier)) [1449821](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1449821). [PMID](/source/PMID_(identifier)) [14713693](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14713693).

1. **[^](#cite_ref-RobockSAD_2-0)** Robock, Alan; Toon, Owen B (2012). ["Self-assured destruction: The climate impacts of nuclear war"](https://web.archive.org/web/20200402175725/http://thebulletin.org/2012/september/self-assured-destruction-climate-impacts-nuclear-war). *Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists*. **68** (5): 66–74. [Bibcode](/source/Bibcode_(identifier)):[2012BuAtS..68e..66R](https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012BuAtS..68e..66R). [doi](/source/Doi_(identifier)):[10.1177/0096340212459127](https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0096340212459127). [S2CID](/source/S2CID_(identifier)) [14377214](https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:14377214). Archived from [the original](http://thebulletin.org/2012/september/self-assured-destruction-climate-impacts-nuclear-war) on 2 April 2020. Retrieved 13 February 2016.

1. ^ [***a***](#cite_ref-bmartin.cc_3-0) [***b***](#cite_ref-bmartin.cc_3-1) Martin, Brian (1982). ["Critique of Nuclear Extinction"](http://www.bmartin.cc/pubs/82jpr.html). *Journal of Peace Research*. **19** (4): 287–300. [doi](/source/Doi_(identifier)):[10.1177/002234338201900401](https://doi.org/10.1177%2F002234338201900401). [S2CID](/source/S2CID_(identifier)) [110974484](https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:110974484).

1. **[^](#cite_ref-4)** [The Effects of a Global Thermonuclear War](http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/nuclear/nuclearwar1.html). Johnstonsarchive.net. Retrieved on 2013-07-21.

1. ^ [***a***](#cite_ref-ReferenceB_5-0) [***b***](#cite_ref-ReferenceB_5-1) [***c***](#cite_ref-ReferenceB_5-2) Martin, Brian (December 1982). ["The global health effects of nuclear war"](http://www.bmartin.cc/pubs/82cab/index.html). *Current Affairs Bulletin*. **59** (7): 14–26.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-6)** Detonations, National Research Council (16 November 1975). [*Long-term worldwide effects of multiple nuclear-weapons detonations*](https://trove.nla.gov.au/version/25667274). Washington : National Academy of Sciences. [ISBN](/source/ISBN_(identifier)) [9780309024181](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/9780309024181). Retrieved 16 November 2018 – via Trove.{{[cite book](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Cite_book)}}: CS1 maint: publisher location ([link](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:CS1_maint:_publisher_location))

1. **[^](#cite_ref-7)** ["Nuclear Holocausts: Atomic War in Fiction | Common Errors in English Usage and More | Washington State University"](https://brians.wsu.edu/supplementary-checklist/).

1. **[^](#cite_ref-AmHeritage_8-0)** ["holocaust"](http://www.thefreedictionary.com/holocaust). Retrieved 16 November 2018 – via The Free Dictionary.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-9)** ["holocaust – Definition of holocaust in US English by Oxford Dictionaries"](https://web.archive.org/web/20130606013221/http://oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/holocaust). *Oxford Dictionaries – English*. Archived from [the original](http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/holocaust) on June 6, 2013. Retrieved 16 November 2018.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-10)** Reginald Glossop, The Orphan of Space (London: G. MacDonald, 1926), pp. 303–306.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-j999_11-0)** Skinner, Rob (2021-09-30). ["'Against Nuclear Imperialism': peace, race and anti-colonialism in the early 1960s"](https://www.bristol.ac.uk/history/public-engagement/blackhistory/snapshots2021/nuclear/). *University of Bristol*. Retrieved 2025-01-03.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-b190_12-0)** Hsu, Hsuan L. (2014-05-21). ["Nuclear colonialism"](https://www.environmentandsociety.org/exhibitions/risk-and-militarization/nuclear-colonialism). *Environment & Society Portal*. Retrieved 2025-01-03.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-w082_13-0)** Maguire, Richard (2007). ["From the Guest Editor: The nuclear weapon and genocide: The beginning of a discussion"](https://doi.org/10.1080%2F14623520701528866). *Journal of Genocide Research*. **9** (3): 353–360. [doi](/source/Doi_(identifier)):[10.1080/14623520701528866](https://doi.org/10.1080%2F14623520701528866). [ISSN](/source/ISSN_(identifier)) [1462-3528](https://search.worldcat.org/issn/1462-3528).

1. **[^](#cite_ref-14)** ["Status of World Nuclear Forces"](https://fas.org/issues/nuclear-weapons/status-world-nuclear-forces/). *Federation of American Scientists*. Retrieved 26 April 2020.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-15)** ["Fact Sheet: Building Global Security by Taking Nuclear Weapons off Hair-Trigger Alert"](http://www.nti.org/analysis/articles/fact-sheet-building-global-security-taking-nuclear-weapons-hair-trigger-alert/). [National Threat Initiative](https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=National_Threat_Initiative&action=edit&redlink=1). 15 October 2012. Retrieved 22 March 2016.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-16)** Broad, William J (2014-09-21). ["U.S. Ramping Up Major Renewal in Nuclear Arms"](https://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/22/us/us-ramping-up-major-renewal-in-nuclear-arms.html?_r=0). *New York Times*. Retrieved 24 January 2016.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-17)** Mecklin, John (4 March 2015). ["Disarm and Modernize"](https://foreignpolicy.com/2015/03/24/disarm-and-modernize-nuclear-weapons-warheads/). Retrieved 22 March 2016.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-18)** Kristensen, H. M.; Norris, R. S. (20 June 2014). "Slowing nuclear weapon reductions and endless nuclear weapon modernizations: A challenge to the NPT". *Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists*. **70** (4): 94–107. [Bibcode](/source/Bibcode_(identifier)):[2014BuAtS..70d..94K](https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014BuAtS..70d..94K). [doi](/source/Doi_(identifier)):[10.1177/0096340214540062](https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0096340214540062). [S2CID](/source/S2CID_(identifier)) [145122829](https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:145122829).

1. **[^](#cite_ref-19)** Rhodan, Maya (January 2016). ["4 Times the World Came Close to 'Doomsday'"](https://time.com/4193889/doomsday-clock-changed-2016/). *Time*. Retrieved 24 May 2020.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-james_20-0)** James, Sara (January 24, 2020). ["'If there's ever a time to wake up, it's now': Doomsday Clock moves 20-seconds closer to midnight"](https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-01-24/doomsday-clock-moves-closest-to-midnight-in-73-year-history/11896294). *ABC News*. Australian Broadcasting Corporation. Retrieved January 24, 2020.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-21)** ["2026 Doomsday Clock Statement"](https://thebulletin.org/doomsday-clock/2026-statement/). *Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists*. Retrieved 1 February 2026.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-22)** Allison, Graham (2012). ["The Cuban Missile Crisis at 50"](http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/137679/graham-allison/the-cuban-missile-crisis-at-50). *[Foreign Affairs](/source/Foreign_Affairs)*. **91** (4). Retrieved 9 July 2012.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-23)** ["ВЗГЛЯД / "США и Россия: кризис 1962–го""](https://web.archive.org/web/20131214084315/http://www.vzglyad.ru/opinions/2013/11/22/660828.html). vzglyad.ru. 22 November 2013. Archived from [the original](http://www.vzglyad.ru/opinions/2013/11/22/660828.html) on 14 December 2013. Retrieved 29 January 2016.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-24)** Sandberg, Anders; Bostrom, Nick. ["Global Catastrophic Risks Survey"](https://web.archive.org/web/20161020075724/http://www.global-catastrophic-risks.com/docs/2008-1.pdf) (PDF). *Future of Humanity Institute*. Future of Humanity Institute, Oxford University. Archived from [the original](http://www.global-catastrophic-risks.com/docs/2008-1.pdf) (PDF) on 20 October 2016. Retrieved 18 August 2016.

1. ^ [***a***](#cite_ref-RobockRegional2007_25-0) [***b***](#cite_ref-RobockRegional2007_25-1) Robock, A; Oman, L; Stenchikov, GL; Toon, OB; Bardeen, C; Turco, RP (2007). ["Climatic consequences of regional nuclear conflicts"](https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00296198/file/acp-7-2003-2007.pdf) (PDF). *Atmos. Chem. Phys*. **7** (8): 2003–2012. [Bibcode](/source/Bibcode_(identifier)):[2007ACP.....7.2003R](https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ACP.....7.2003R). [doi](/source/Doi_(identifier)):[10.5194/acp-7-2003-2007](https://doi.org/10.5194%2Facp-7-2003-2007).

1. ^ [***a***](#cite_ref-ToonandRobock2010_26-0) [***b***](#cite_ref-ToonandRobock2010_26-1) [***c***](#cite_ref-ToonandRobock2010_26-2) [***d***](#cite_ref-ToonandRobock2010_26-3) Robock, A; Toon, OB (2010). ["Local nuclear war, global suffering"](https://web.archive.org/web/20171215060319/http://academic.evergreen.edu/z/zita/articles/SciAm/GW_CC/NuclearWar2010.pdf) (PDF). *Scientific American*. **302** (1): 74–81. [Bibcode](/source/Bibcode_(identifier)):[2010SciAm.302a..74R](https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010SciAm.302a..74R). [doi](/source/Doi_(identifier)):[10.1038/scientificamerican0110-74](https://doi.org/10.1038%2Fscientificamerican0110-74) (inactive 1 July 2025). [PMID](/source/PMID_(identifier)) [20063639](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20063639). Archived from [the original](http://academic.evergreen.edu/z/zita/articles/SciAm/GW_CC/NuclearWar2010.pdf) (PDF) on 15 December 2017. Retrieved 13 February 2016.{{[cite journal](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Cite_journal)}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of July 2025 ([link](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:CS1_maint:_DOI_inactive_as_of_July_2025))

1. ^ [***a***](#cite_ref-NatureFood2022_27-0) [***b***](#cite_ref-NatureFood2022_27-1) Xia, Lili; Robock, Alan; Scherrer, Kim; Harrison, Cheryl S.; Bodirsky, Benjamin Leon; Weindl, Isabelle; Jägermeyr, Jonas; Bardeen, Charles G.; Toon, Owen B.; Heneghan, Ryan (15 August 2022). ["Global food insecurity and famine from reduced crop, marine fishery and livestock production due to climate disruption from nuclear war soot injection"](https://doi.org/10.1038%2Fs43016-022-00573-0). *[Nature Food](/source/Nature_Food)*. **3** (8): 586–596. [Bibcode](/source/Bibcode_(identifier)):[2022NatFd...3..586X](https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022NatFd...3..586X). [doi](/source/Doi_(identifier)):[10.1038/s43016-022-00573-0](https://doi.org/10.1038%2Fs43016-022-00573-0). [hdl](/source/Hdl_(identifier)):[11250/3039288](https://hdl.handle.net/11250%2F3039288). [PMID](/source/PMID_(identifier)) [37118594](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37118594). [S2CID](/source/S2CID_(identifier)) [251601831](https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:251601831).

1. **[^](#cite_ref-28)** [Parfit, Derek](/source/Derek_Parfit) (1986). "154. How both human history, and the history of ethics, maybe just beginning". [*Reasons and Persons*](/source/Reasons_and_Persons). [Oxford University Press](/source/Oxford_University_Press).

1. **[^](#cite_ref-29)** [Bostrom, Nick](/source/Nick_Bostrom) (2013). ["Existential Risk Prevention as Global Priority"](http://www.existential-risk.org/concept.html). *[Global Policy](/source/Global_Policy)*. **4** (1): 15–31. [doi](/source/Doi_(identifier)):[10.1111/1758-5899.12002](https://doi.org/10.1111%2F1758-5899.12002).

1. **[^](#cite_ref-tonn_30-0)** Tonn, Bruce & MacGregor, Donald (2009). "A singular chain of events". *Futures*. **41** (10): 706–714. [doi](/source/Doi_(identifier)):[10.1016/j.futures.2009.07.009](https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.futures.2009.07.009). [S2CID](/source/S2CID_(identifier)) [144553194](https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:144553194).

1. ^ [***a***](#cite_ref-bostrom2002_31-0) [***b***](#cite_ref-bostrom2002_31-1) Bostrom, Nick (2002). ["Existential risks"](http://www.nickbostrom.com/existential/risks.html). *Journal of Evolution and Technology*. **9** (1): 1–31, §4.2.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-32)** [Max Tegmark](/source/Max_Tegmark) (2017). "Chapter 5: Aftermath: The Next 10,000 Years". [*Life 3.0: Being Human in the Age of Artificial Intelligence*](/source/Life_3.0%3A_Being_Human_in_the_Age_of_Artificial_Intelligence) (1st ed.). Doomsday Devices: Knopf. [ISBN](/source/ISBN_(identifier)) [9780451485076](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/9780451485076).

1. **[^](#cite_ref-Report1979_33-0)** Johns, Lionel S; Sharfman, Peter; Medalia, Jonathan; Vining, Robert W; Lewis, Kevin; Proctor, Gloria (1979). [*The Effects of Nuclear War*](https://www.princeton.edu/~ota/disk3/1979/7906/7906.PDF) (PDF). Library of Congress. Retrieved 13 February 2016.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-Britannica_34-0)** ["Nuclear winter"](https://www.britannica.com/topic/nuclear-winter). *Encyclopædia Britannica*. Retrieved 13 February 2016.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-35)** Turco, R. P.; Toon, O. B.; Ackerman, T. P.; Pollack, J. B.; Sagan, C. (23 December 1983). "Nuclear Winter: Global Consequences of Multiple Nuclear Explosions". *Science*. **222** (4630): 1283–92. [Bibcode](/source/Bibcode_(identifier)):[1983Sci...222.1283T](https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983Sci...222.1283T). [doi](/source/Doi_(identifier)):[10.1126/science.222.4630.1283](https://doi.org/10.1126%2Fscience.222.4630.1283). [PMID](/source/PMID_(identifier)) [17773320](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17773320). [S2CID](/source/S2CID_(identifier)) [45515251](https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:45515251).

1. ^ [***a***](#cite_ref-Robock2007_36-0) [***b***](#cite_ref-Robock2007_36-1) Robock, Alan; Oman, Luke; Stenchikov, Georgiy L. (2007). ["Nuclear winter revisited with a modern climate model and current nuclear arsenals: Still catastrophic consequences"](http://climate.envsci.rutgers.edu/pdf/RobockNW2006JD008235.pdf) (PDF). *Journal of Geophysical Research*. **112** (D13107): 14. [Bibcode](/source/Bibcode_(identifier)):[2007JGRD..11213107R](https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007JGRD..11213107R). [doi](/source/Doi_(identifier)):[10.1029/2006JD008235](https://doi.org/10.1029%2F2006JD008235). Retrieved 13 February 2016.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-ScienceDaily_37-0)** [Regional Nuclear War Could Devastate Global Climate](https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/12/061211090729.htm), Science Daily, December 11, 2006

1. **[^](#cite_ref-Mills2008_38-0)** Mills, M. J.; Toon, O. B.; Turco, R. P.; Kinnison, D. E.; Garcia, R. R. (2008). ["Massive global ozone loss predicted following regional nuclear conflict"](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2291128). *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A*. **105** (14): 5307–12. [Bibcode](/source/Bibcode_(identifier)):[2008PNAS..105.5307M](https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008PNAS..105.5307M). [doi](/source/Doi_(identifier)):[10.1073/pnas.0710058105](https://doi.org/10.1073%2Fpnas.0710058105). [PMC](/source/PMC_(identifier)) [2291128](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2291128). [PMID](/source/PMID_(identifier)) [18391218](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18391218).[as PDF](http://acd.ucar.edu/~mmills/pdf/2008MillsPNAS_MassiveOzoneLoss.pdf) [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20160304100404/http://acd.ucar.edu/~mmills/pdf/2008MillsPNAS_MassiveOzoneLoss.pdf) 2016-03-04 at the [Wayback Machine](/source/Wayback_Machine)

1. **[^](#cite_ref-39)** Harwell, M., and C. Harwell. (1986). "Nuclear Famine: The Indirect Effects of Nuclear War", pp. 117–135 in Solomon, F. and R. Marston (Eds.). *The Medical Implications of Nuclear War*. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. [ISBN](/source/ISBN_(identifier)) [0309036925](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/0309036925).

1. **[^](#cite_ref-IPPNWreport2013_40-0)** Helfand, Ira. ["Nuclear Famine: Two Billion Prople at Risk?"](https://www.ippnw.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/2013-Nuclear-Famine.pdf) (PDF). *IPPNW*. Retrieved 30 December 2022.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-IPPNWreport2022_41-0)** Bivens, Matt. ["Nuclear Famine: Even a "limited" nuclear war would cause abrupt climate disruption and global starvation"](https://www.ippnw.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/ENGLISH-Nuclear-Famine-Report-Final-bleed-marks.pdf) (PDF). *IPPNW*. Retrieved 30 December 2022.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-42)** ["Here's How Bad a Nuclear War Would Actually Be"](https://time.com/6290977/nuclear-war-impact-essay/). *Time*. 29 June 2023.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-science_43-0)** Broad, William J. "Nuclear Pulse (I): Awakening to the Chaos Factor", *Science*. 29 May 1981 212: 1009–1012

1. ^ [***a***](#cite_ref-EMP_report_44-0) [***b***](#cite_ref-EMP_report_44-1) ["Report of the Commission to Assess the Threat to the United States from Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) Attack"](http://commdocs.house.gov/committees/security/has204000.000/has204000_0.HTM). Retrieved 16 January 2016.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-45)** Paul Bedard (2013-06-17). ["Lights out: House plan would protect nation's electricity from solar flare, nuclear bomb"](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/washington-secrets/95479/lights-out-house-plan-would-protect-nations-electricity-from-solar-flare-nuclear-bomb/). *[Washington Examiner](/source/Washington_Examiner)*. Retrieved 2025-11-12.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-46)** House of Commons Defence Committee, ["Developing Threats: Electro-Magnetic Pulses (EMP)"](https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201012/cmselect/cmdfence/1552/1552.pdf). Tenth Report of Session 2010–12.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-47)** Woosley, R. James; Pry, Peter Vincent (2014-08-12). ["The Growing Threat From an EMP Attack"](https://www.wsj.com/articles/james-woolsey-and-peter-vincent-pry-the-growing-threat-from-an-emp-attack-1407885281). *[Wall Street Journal](/source/Wall_Street_Journal)*. Retrieved 2016-01-16.

1. ^ [***a***](#cite_ref-PT2016_48-0) [***b***](#cite_ref-PT2016_48-1) Corneliussen, Steven T. (2016-06-23). "Conservative media sustain alarm about a possible electromagnetic-pulse catastrophe". *[Physics Today](/source/Physics_Today)* (6): 11830. [Bibcode](/source/Bibcode_(identifier)):[2016PhT..2016f1830C](https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016PhT..2016f1830C). [doi](/source/Doi_(identifier)):[10.1063/PT.5.8178](https://doi.org/10.1063%2FPT.5.8178).

1. **[^](#cite_ref-s257_49-0)** Adams, Lilly (May 26, 2020). ["Resuming Nuclear Testing a Slap in the Face to Survivors"](https://blog.ucsusa.org/lilly-adams/resuming-nuclear-testing-a-slap-in-the-face-to-survivors/). *The Equation*. Retrieved July 16, 2024.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-50)** ["Radioactive Fallout | Effects of Nuclear Weapons | atomicarchive.com"](http://www.atomicarchive.com/Effects/effects17.shtml). *www.atomicarchive.com*. Retrieved 2016-12-31.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-51)** ["AtomicBombMuseum.org – Destructive Effects"](http://atomicbombmuseum.org/3_radioactivity.shtml). *atomicbombmuseum.org*. Retrieved 2016-12-31.

1. ^ [***a***](#cite_ref-AtomicArchive_52-0) [***b***](#cite_ref-AtomicArchive_52-1) ["Radioactive Fallout"](http://www.atomicarchive.com/Effects/effects17.shtml). *Atomic Archive*. Retrieved 23 January 2016.

1. ^ [***a***](#cite_ref-Coggle_&_Lindop_53-0) [***b***](#cite_ref-Coggle_&_Lindop_53-1) Coggle, J.E., Lindop, Patricia J. "Medical Consequences of Radiation Following a Global Nuclear War." The Aftermath (1983): 60–71.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-54)** ["公益財団法人 放射線影響研究所 RERF"](http://www.rerf.jp/radefx/genetics_e/birthdef.html). *www.rerf.jp*. Retrieved 16 November 2018.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-55)** ["Archived copy"](https://web.archive.org/web/20080410131227/http://worf.eh.doe.gov/data/ihp1c/0863_a.pdf) (PDF). *worf.eh.doe.gov*. Archived from [the original](http://worf.eh.doe.gov/data/ihp1c/0863_a.pdf) (PDF) on 10 April 2008. Retrieved 15 July 2024.{{[cite web](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Cite_web)}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title ([link](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:CS1_maint:_archived_copy_as_title))

1. ^ [***a***](#cite_ref-The_fate_of_extinction_arguments_56-0) [***b***](#cite_ref-The_fate_of_extinction_arguments_56-1) Martin, Brian (March 1983). ["The fate of extinction arguments"](http://www.bmartin.cc/pubs/83fea.html). Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Australian National University.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-57)** [Willens, Harold](/source/Harold_Willens) (1990). ["The Trimtab factor, 1984"](http://c-g-i.info/images/nuclear-weapons-chart.jpg). *Alternatives*. **16** (4).

1. **[^](#cite_ref-58)** Foden, J. (1986-01-01). ["The petrology of Tambora volcano, Indonesia: A model for the 1815 eruption"](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/037702738690079X). *Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research*. **27** (1–2): 1–41. [Bibcode](/source/Bibcode_(identifier)):[1986JVGR...27....1F](https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1986JVGR...27....1F). [doi](/source/Doi_(identifier)):[10.1016/0377-0273(86)90079-X](https://doi.org/10.1016%2F0377-0273%2886%2990079-X). [ISSN](/source/ISSN_(identifier)) [0377-0273](https://search.worldcat.org/issn/0377-0273).

1. **[^](#cite_ref-Stothers1984_59-0)** Stothers, Richard B. (1984). "The Great Tambora Eruption in 1815 and Its Aftermath". *[Science](/source/Science_(journal))*. **224** (4654): 1191–1198. [Bibcode](/source/Bibcode_(identifier)):[1984Sci...224.1191S](https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1984Sci...224.1191S). [doi](/source/Doi_(identifier)):[10.1126/science.224.4654.1191](https://doi.org/10.1126%2Fscience.224.4654.1191). [PMID](/source/PMID_(identifier)) [17819476](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17819476). [S2CID](/source/S2CID_(identifier)) [23649251](https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:23649251).

1. **[^](#cite_ref-Oppenheimer2003_60-0)** Oppenheimer, Clive (2003). "Climatic, environmental and human consequences of the largest known historic eruption: Tambora volcano (Indonesia) 1815". *Progress in Physical Geography*. **27** (2): 230–259. [Bibcode](/source/Bibcode_(identifier)):[2003PrPG...27..230O](https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003PrPG...27..230O). [doi](/source/Doi_(identifier)):[10.1191/0309133303pp379ra](https://doi.org/10.1191%2F0309133303pp379ra). [S2CID](/source/S2CID_(identifier)) [131663534](https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:131663534).

1. **[^](#cite_ref-USGS_61-0)** ["Supersized eruptions are all the rage!"](https://hvo.wr.usgs.gov/volcanowatch/2005/05_04_28.html). [USGS](/source/United_States_Geological_Survey). April 28, 2005.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-robock2009_62-0)** Robock, A.; C.M. Ammann; L. Oman; D. Shindell; S. Levis; G. Stenchikov (2009). ["Did the Toba volcanic eruption of ~74k BP produce widespread glaciation?"](https://doi.org/10.1029%2F2008JD011652). *[Journal of Geophysical Research](/source/Journal_of_Geophysical_Research)*. **114** (D10): D10107. [Bibcode](/source/Bibcode_(identifier)):[2009JGRD..11410107R](https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009JGRD..11410107R). [doi](/source/Doi_(identifier)):[10.1029/2008JD011652](https://doi.org/10.1029%2F2008JD011652).

1. **[^](#cite_ref-63)** Huang, C.Y.; Zhao, M.X.; Wang, C.C.; Wei, G.J. (2001). ["Cooling of the South China Sea by the Toba Eruption and correlation with other climate proxies ~71,000 years ago"](https://doi.org/10.1029%2F2000GL006113). *Geophysical Research Letters*. **28** (20): 3915–3918. [Bibcode](/source/Bibcode_(identifier)):[2001GeoRL..28.3915H](https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001GeoRL..28.3915H). [doi](/source/Doi_(identifier)):[10.1029/2000GL006113](https://doi.org/10.1029%2F2000GL006113).

1. **[^](#cite_ref-ReferenceA_64-0)** [Margulis, Lynn](/source/Lynn_Margulis) (1999). *Symbiotic Planet: A New Look At Evolution*. Houston: Basic Book.

## External links

- [Nuclear Holocausts: Atomic War in Fiction, By Paul Brians, Professor of English, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington](http://www.wsu.edu/~brians/nuclear/index.htm)

- [Brief Q&A](http://www.overcomingbias.com/2012/11/nuclear-winter-and-human-extinction-qa-with-luke-oman.html) with [Luke Oman](https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Luke_Oman&action=edit&redlink=1) on the unlikeliness of human extinction from nuclear war

v t e Global catastrophic risks Future of the Earth Future of an expanding universe Ultimate fate of the universe Human extinction risk estimates Technological Chemical warfare Cyberattack Cyberwarfare Cyberterrorism Cybergeddon Ransomware Gray goo Nanoweapons Kinetic bombardment Kinetic energy weapon Nuclear warfare Mutually assured destruction Dead Hand Doomsday Clock Doomsday device Antimatter weapon Electromagnetic pulse (EMP) Safety of high-energy particle collision experiments Micro black hole Strangelet Synthetic intelligence / Artificial intelligence AI takeover Existential risk from artificial intelligence Technological singularity Transhumanism Year 2000 problem Year 2038 problem Sociological Anthropogenic hazard Collapsology Doomsday argument Self-indication assumption doomsday argument rebuttal Self-referencing doomsday argument rebuttal Economic collapse Malthusian catastrophe New World Order conspiracy theory Nuclear holocaust cobalt famine winter Riots Social crisis Societal collapse State collapse World War III Ecological Climate change Anoxic event Biodiversity loss Mass mortality event Cascade effect Cataclysmic pole shift hypothesis Deforestation Desertification Plant or animal species extinctions Civilizational collapse Tipping points Climate sensitivity Flood basalt Global dimming Global terrestrial stilling Global warming Hypercane Ice age Ecocide Ecosystem collapse Environmental degradation Habitat destruction Human impact on the environment coral reefs on marine life Land degradation Land consumption Land surface effects on climate Ocean acidification Ozone depletion Resource depletion Sea level rise Supervolcano winter Verneshot Water pollution Water scarcity Earth Overshoot Day Overexploitation Overpopulation Human overpopulation Biological Extinction Extinction event Holocene extinction Human extinction List of extinction events Genetic erosion Genetic pollution Others Biodiversity loss Decline in amphibian populations Decline in insect populations Biotechnology risk Biological agent Biological warfare Bioterrorism Colony collapse disorder Defaunation Dysgenics Interplanetary contamination Pandemic Pollinator decline Overfishing Astronomical Big Crunch Big Rip Coronal mass ejection Cosmological phase transition Geomagnetic storm False vacuum decay Gamma-ray burst Heat death of the universe Proton decay Virtual black hole Impact event Asteroid impact avoidance Asteroid impact prediction Potentially hazardous object Near-Earth object winter Rogue planet Rogue star Near-Earth supernova Hypernova Micronova Solar flare Stellar collision Eschatological Buddhist Maitreya Three Ages Hindu Kalki Kali Yuga Last Judgement Second Coming 1 Enoch Daniel Abomination of desolation Prophecy of Seventy Weeks Messiah Christian Futurism Historicism Interpretations of Revelation Idealism Preterism 2 Esdras 2 Thessalonians Man of sin Katechon Antichrist Book of Revelation Events Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse Seven bowls Seven seals Seven trumpets The Beast Two witnesses War in Heaven Whore of Babylon Great Apostasy New Earth New Jerusalem Olivet Discourse Great Tribulation Son of perdition Sheep and Goats Islamic al-Qa'im Beast of the Earth Dhu'l-Qarnayn Dhu'l-Suwayqatayn Dajjal Israfil Mahdi Sufyani Jewish Messiah War of Gog and Magog Third Temple Armilus Norse Zoroastrian Saoshyant Others 2011 end times prediction 2012 phenomenon Apocalypse Apocalyptic literature Apocalypticism Armageddon Blood moon prophecy Earth Changes End time Gog and Magog List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events Messianism Messianic Age Millenarianism Millennialism Premillennialism Amillennialism Postmillennialism Nemesis (hypothetical star) Nibiru cataclysm Rapture Prewrath Posttribulation rapture Resurrection of the dead Vulnerable world hypothesis World to come Fictional Alien invasion Apocalyptic and post-apocalyptic fiction List of apocalyptic and post-apocalyptic fiction List of apocalyptic films Climate fiction Disaster films List of disaster films Zombie apocalypse Zombie Organizations Centre for the Study of Existential Risk Future of Humanity Institute Future of Life Institute Nuclear Threat Initiative General Declinism Disaster Depression Financial crisis Hazard Survivalism World portal Categories Apocalypticism Future problems Hazards Risk analysis Doomsday scenarios

v t e Pollution History Air Acid rain Air quality index Air pollution measurement Atmospheric dispersion modeling Chlorofluorocarbon Combustion Biofuel Biomass Coal Joss paper Open burning of waste Construction Renovation Demolition Exhaust gas Diesel exhaust Haze Smoke Indoor air quality Internal combustion engine Global dimming Global distillation Mining Ozone depletion Particulates Asbestos Oil refining Polluting cooking fuels Persistent organic pollutant Smelting Smog Soot Black carbon Volatile organic compound Waste Biological Biological hazard Genetic pollution Introduced species Invasive species Digital Information pollution Electromagnetic Light Ecological light pollution Overillumination Radio spectrum pollution Natural Ozone Radium and radon in the environment Volcanic ash Wildfire Noise Transportation Land Water Air Rail Sustainable transport Urban Sonar Marine mammals and sonar Industrial Military Abstract Noise control Radiation Actinides Bioremediation Nuclear fission Nuclear fallout Plutonium Poisoning Radioactivity Uranium Electromagnetic radiation and health Radioactive waste Soil Agricultural pollution Herbicides Manure waste Pesticides Land degradation Bioremediation Open defecation Electrical resistance heating Soil guideline values Phytoremediation Solid waste Advertising mail Biodegradable waste Brown waste Electronic waste Battery recycling Foam food container Food waste Green waste Hazardous waste Biomedical waste Chemical waste Construction waste Lead poisoning Mercury poisoning Toxic waste Industrial waste Lead smelting Litter Mining Coal mining Gold mining Surface mining Deep sea mining Mining waste Uranium mining Municipal solid waste Garbage Nanomaterials Plastic pollution Microplastics Packaging waste Post-consumer waste Waste management Landfill Thermal treatment Space Satellite Visual Air travel Clutter (advertising) Traffic signs Overhead power lines Vandalism War Chemical warfare Herbicidal warfare (Agent Orange) Nuclear holocaust (Nuclear fallout - nuclear famine - nuclear winter) Scorched earth Unexploded ordnance War and environmental law Water Agricultural wastewater Biological pollution Diseases Eutrophication Firewater Freshwater Groundwater Hypoxia Industrial wastewater Marine debris Monitoring Nonpoint source pollution Nutrient pollution Ocean acidification Oil exploitation Oil exploration Oil spill Pharmaceuticals Sewage Septic tanks Pit latrine Shipping Stagnation Sulfur water Surface runoff Thermal Turbidity Urban runoff Water quality Topics Pollutants Heavy metals Paint Brain health and pollution Misc Area source Debris Dust Garbology Legacy pollution Midden Point source Waste Responses Cleaner production Industrial ecology Pollution haven hypothesis Pollutant release and transfer register Polluter pays principle Pollution control Waste minimisation Zero waste Lists Diseases Law by country Most polluted cities Least polluted cities by PM2.5 Most polluted countries Most polluted rivers Treaties Categories (by country) Commons WikiProject Environment WikiProject Ecology Environment portal Ecology portal

---
Adapted from the Wikipedia article [Nuclear holocaust](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_holocaust) by Wikipedia contributors ([contributor history](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_holocaust?action=history)). Available under [Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Changes may have been made.