# Landscape-scale conservation

> Mediated Wiki article. Canonical URL: https://mediated.wiki/source/Landscape-scale_conservation
> Markdown URL: https://mediated.wiki/source/Landscape-scale_conservation.md
> Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landscape-scale_conservation
> Source revision: 1330192305
> License: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/)

{{Short description|Holistic approach to landscape management}}
[[File:Little Malvern Hills panorama.jpg|thumb|upright=1.7|Landscape scale conservation attempts to reconcile competing pressures on the designated [Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty](/source/Areas_of_Outstanding_Natural_Beauty) across the United Kingdom.<ref name="Phillips 2005"/>]]
'''Landscape-scale conservation''' is a [holistic](/source/holistic) approach to [landscape](/source/landscape) management, aiming to reconcile the competing objectives of [nature conservation](/source/nature_conservation) and economic activities across a given landscape. Landscape-scale conservation may sometimes be attempted because of [climate change](/source/climate_change). It can be seen as an alternative to [site based conservation](/source/site_based_conservation).

Many global problems such as [poverty](/source/poverty), [food security](/source/food_security), [climate change](/source/climate_change), [water scarcity](/source/water_scarcity), [deforestation](/source/deforestation) and [biodiversity loss](/source/biodiversity_loss) are connected.<ref name="LSLB" /><ref name="learning" /> For example, lifting people out of poverty can increase consumption and drive climate change.<ref name="Stern">{{cite book |last1=Stern |first1=N |title=The Economics of Climate Change: the Stern Review |date=2007 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |location=Cambridge UK}}</ref> [Expanding agriculture](/source/agricultural_expansion) can exacerbate [water scarcity](/source/water_scarcity) and drive [habitat loss](/source/habitat_loss).<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Tilman |first1=D |title=Global environmental impacts of agricultural expansion: the need for sustainable and efficient practices |journal=Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA |volume=96 |issue=11 |pages=5995–6000 |doi=10.1073/pnas.96.11.5995 |pmid=10339530 |pmc=34218 |date=1999-05-25|bibcode=1999PNAS...96.5995T |doi-access=free }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Laurance |first1=W F |last2=Sayer |first2=J |last3=Cassman |first3=KG |title=Agricultural expansion and its impacts on tropical nature |journal=Trends in Ecology & Evolution |date=2014 |volume=29 |issue=2 |pages=107–116 |doi=10.1016/j.tree.2013.12.001 |pmid=24388286}}</ref> Proponents of landscape management argue that as these problems are interconnected, coordinated approaches are needed to address them, by focussing on how landscapes can generate multiple benefits. For example, a river basin can supply water for towns and [agriculture](/source/agriculture), timber and food crops for people and industry, and habitat for biodiversity; and each one of these users can have impacts on the others.<ref name="LSLB" /><ref name="learning" /><ref name="Hart">{{cite journal |last1=Hart |first1=A K |last2=McMichael |first2=P |last3=Milder |first3=J C |last4=Scherr |first4=Sara J |title=Multi-functional landscapes from the grassroots? The role of rural producer movements |journal=Agriculture and Human Values |date=2015 |volume=33 |issue=2 |pages=305–322 |doi=10.1007/s10460-015-9611-1|s2cid=153211771 }}</ref>

Landscapes in general have been recognised as important units for conservation by intergovernmental bodies,<ref name="SBSTTA report" /> government initiatives,<ref name="GMS BLL" /><ref name="IINDC" /> and research institutes.<ref name="CIFOR landscapes pg" />

Problems with this approach include difficulties in monitoring, and the proliferation of definitions and terms relating to it.<ref name="learning" />

== Definitions ==
[[File:Maintenance Burn (16917515735).jpg|thumb|[Bureau of Land Management](/source/Bureau_of_Land_Management) [using fire to maintain a landscape](/source/Controlled_burn) in Western [Oregon](/source/Oregon)]]

There are many overlapping terms and definitions,<ref name="Reed" /><ref>{{Cite news |url=https://forestsnews.cifor.org/23834/landscape-approach-defies-simple-definition-and-thats-good?fnl=en |title='Landscape approach' defies simple definition — and that's good |date=2014-08-27 |work=CIFOR Forests News |access-date=2017-09-20 |language=en-US}}</ref> but many terms have similar meanings.<ref name="learning" /><ref name="Minang" /> A [sustainable](/source/sustainable) landscape, for example, meets "the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs."<ref name="LSLB">{{cite book |last1=Denier |first1=L. |last2=Scherr |first2=S. |last3=Shames |first3=S. |last4=Chatterton |first4=P. |last5=Hovani |first5=L. |last6=Stam |first6=N. |title=The Little Sustainable Landscapes Book |date=2015 |publisher=Global Canopy Programme |location=Oxford |url=http://globalcanopy.org/sustainablelandscapes}}</ref>

Approaching conservation by means of landscapes can be seen as "a conceptual framework whereby [stakeholder](/source/Project_stakeholder)s in a landscape aim to reconcile competing social, economic and environmental objectives". Instead of focussing on a single use of the land it aims to ensure that the interests of different stakeholders are met.<ref name="LSLB"/>

The starting point for all landscape-scale conservation schemes must be an understanding of the character of the landscape. Landscape character goes beyond aesthetic. It involves understanding how the landscape functions to support communities, cultural heritage and development, the economy, as well as the wildlife and natural resources of the area. Landscape character requires careful assessment according to accepted methodologies. Landscape character assessment will contribute to the determination of what scale is appropriate in which landscape. "Landscape scale" does not merely mean acting at a bigger scale: it means conservation is carried out at the correct scale and that it takes into account the human elements of the landscape, both past and present.

== History ==
[[File:Schotse hooglander.JPG |thumb |[Highland cow](/source/Highland_cattle) helping to maintain the landscape near [Hilversum](/source/Hilversum) in the Netherlands]]

The word 'landscape' in English is a loanword from [Dutch](/source/Dutch_language) ''landschap'' introduced in the 1660s and [originally meant a painting](/source/Landscape_painting). The meaning a "tract of land with its distinguishing characteristics" was derived from that in 1886. This was then used as a verb as of 1916.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.etymonline.com/word/landscape |title=landscape {{!}} Origin and meaning of landscape |last=Harper |first=Douglas |date=2019 |website=Online Etymology Dictionary |publisher=Douglas Harper |access-date=24 October 2019}}</ref>

The German [geographer](/source/geographer) [Carl Troll](/source/Carl_Troll) coined the German term ''Landschaftsökologie''–thus '[landscape ecology](/source/landscape_ecology)' in 1939.<ref>Troll, C. 1939. Luftbildplan und ökologische Bodenforschung (Aerial photography and ecological studies of the earth). Zeitschrift der Gesellschaft für Erdkunde, Berlin: 241-298.</ref> He developed this terminology and many early concepts of landscape ecology as part of this work, which consisted of applying [aerial photograph](/source/aerial_photograph) interpretation to studies of interactions between environment, agriculture and vegetation.

In the UK conservation of landscapes can be said to have begun in 1945 with the publication of the ''Report to the Government on National Parks in England and Wales''. The [National Parks and Access to the Countryside Act 1949](/source/National_Parks_and_Access_to_the_Countryside_Act_1949) introduced the legislation for the creation [Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty](/source/Areas_of_Outstanding_Natural_Beauty) (AONB).<ref name="AONB story">{{cite web|url=http://www.landscapesforlife.org.uk/aonb-story.html|title=NAAONB|access-date=16 February 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170829080922/http://www.landscapesforlife.org.uk/aonb-story.html|archive-date=29 August 2017}}</ref><ref name=Gov>{{cite web|url= https://www.gov.uk/guidance/areas-of-outstanding-natural-beauty-aonbs-designation-and-management|title=Areas of outstanding natural beauty (AONBs): designation and management|work=gov.uk}}</ref> [Northern Ireland](/source/Northern_Ireland) has the same system after adoption of the Amenity Lands (NI) Act 1965.<ref>[http://www.doeni.gov.uk/niea/protected_areas_home/aonb.htm Northern Ireland Environment Agency] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140902035244/http://www.doeni.gov.uk/niea/protected_areas_home/aonb.htm |date=2 September 2014 }}</ref> The first of these AONB were defined in 1956, with the last being created in 1995.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.tamarvalley.org.uk/about/what-is-the-tamar-valley-aonb/|title=Tamar Valley - What is the Tamar Valley AONB?|website=www.tamarvalley.org.uk|access-date=16 February 2018|archive-date=17 February 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180217024050/http://www.tamarvalley.org.uk/about/what-is-the-tamar-valley-aonb/|url-status=dead}}</ref>

The Permanent European Conference for the Study of the Rural Landscape was established in 1957.<ref>Baker, Alan R.H. (1988) Historical Geography and the Study of the European Rural Landscape. ''Geografiska Annaler'' 70B (1) 5-16.</ref><ref>Helmfrid, Staffan (2004)  The Permanent European Conference and the Study of the Rural Landscape. In Palang, Hannes (red.) (2004). ''European rural landscapes: persistence and change in a globalising environment''. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, p. 467 -</ref> The [European Landscape Convention](/source/European_Landscape_Convention) was initiated by the Congress of Regional and Local Authorities of the [Council of Europe](/source/Council_of_Europe) (CLRAE) in 1994, was adopted by the Committee of Ministers of the [Council of Europe](/source/Council_of_Europe) in 2000,<ref name="Explanatory Report">[http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Reports/Html/176.htm Explanatory Report] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20020330124608/http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/EN/Reports/Html/176.htm |date=2002-03-30 }}, Art. 4.</ref> and came into force in 2004.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/cultureheritage/heritage/Landscape/Publications/ATEP-93_bil.pdf |title= Eighth Council of Europe Workshops for the implementation of the European Landscape Convention, Landscape and driving forces |author = Council of Europe – Cultural heritage, Landscape and Spatial planning Division and Swedish National Heritage Board |date= 2009 | publisher= Malmö, Sweden | access-date = 7 July 2012}}</ref>

The conservation community began to take notice of the science of landscape ecology in the 1980s.<ref name="learning">{{cite journal |last1=Reed |first1=J. |last2=Van Vianen |first2=J. |last3=Deakin |first3=E. L. |last4=Barlow |first4=J. |last5=Sunderland |first5=T. |title=Integrated landscape approaches to managing social and environmental issues in the tropics: learning from the past to guide the future |journal=Global Change Biology |date=2016 |doi=10.1111/gcb.13284 |pmid=26990574 |volume=22 |issue=7 |pages=2540–2554|bibcode=2016GCBio..22.2540R |url=https://researchonline.jcu.edu.au/49345/1/49345_Reed%20et%20al_2016.pdf |doi-access=free }}</ref>

Efforts to develop concepts of landscape management that integrate international social and economic development with biodiversity conservation began in 1992.<ref name="learning" />

Landscape management now exists in multiple iterations and alongside other concepts<ref name="learning" /><ref name="Reed">{{cite journal |last1=Reed |first1=J. |last2=Deakin |first2=E. |last3=Sunderland |first3=T. |title=What are 'Integrated Landscape Approaches' and how effectively have they been implemented in the tropics: a systematic map protocol |journal=Environmental Evidence |date=2015 |volume=4 |issue=2 |page=2 |doi=10.1186/2047-2382-4-2 |doi-access=free |url=http://www.cifor.org/library/5422/what-are-integrated-landscape-approaches-and-how-effectively-have-they-been-implemented-in-the-tropics-a-systematic-map-protocol/ |issn=2047-2382}}</ref><ref name="Scherr Shames Friedman 2013">{{cite journal |last1=Scherr |first1=Sara J. |last2=Shames |first2=S. |last3=Friedman |first3=R. |title=Defining Integrated Landscape Management for Policy Makers |journal=Ecoagriculture Policy Focus |date=2013 |issue=10 |url=http://ecoagriculture.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/DefiningILMforPolicyMakers.pdf |archive-date=2017-01-26 |access-date=2019-10-17 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170126010246/http://ecoagriculture.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/DefiningILMforPolicyMakers.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref name="Minang">{{cite book |last1=Minang |first1=P. A. |last2=van Noordwijk |first2=M. |last3=Freeman |first3=O. E. |last4=Mbow |first4=C. |last5=de Leeuw |first5=J. |last6=Catacutan |first6=D. |title=Climate-Smart Landscapes: Multifunctionality In Practice |date=2015 |publisher=World Agroforestry Center (ICRAF) |location=[Nairobi](/source/Nairobi)}}</ref> such as [watershed management](/source/watershed_management), [landscape ecology](/source/landscape_ecology)<ref name="Sayer">{{cite journal |last1=Sayer |first1=J. |title=Reconciling conservation and development: are landscapes the answer? |journal=Biotropica |date=2009 |volume=41 |issue=6 |doi=10.1111/j.1744-7429.2009.00575.x |pages=649–652|s2cid=85171847 }}</ref> and [cultural landscape](/source/cultural_landscape)s.<ref name=IIED>{{cite web |title=Indigenous Biocultural Territories |url=http://www.biocultural.iied.org/indigenous-biocultural-territories |publisher=IIED}}</ref><ref>UNESCO (2012) Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention [https://whc.unesco.org/archive/opguide12-en.pdf]. UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Paris. Page 14.</ref>

==International==

The [UN Environment Programme](/source/UN_Environment_Programme) stated in 2015 that the landscape approach embodies [ecosystem management](/source/ecosystem_management). UNEP uses the approach with the Ecosystem Management of Productive Landscapes project.<ref name="UNEPEMPL">{{cite web|title=Ecosystems Management of Productive Landscapes |url=https://unepempl.wordpress.com/about/|publisher=UN Environment Programme |date=2015-04-08}}</ref> The scientific committee of the [Convention on Biological Diversity](/source/Convention_on_Biological_Diversity) also considers the perspective of a landscape the most important scale for improving sustainable use of biodiversity.<ref name="SBSTTA report">{{cite web|last1=Convention on Biological Diversity|first1=SBSTTA |title=Report on how to improve sustainable use of biodiversity in a landscape perspective (UNEP/CBD/SBSTTA/15/13)|url=https://www.cbd.int/doc/meetings/sbstta/sbstta-15/official/sbstta-15-13-en.pdf |website=Convention on Biological Diversity}}</ref> There are global fora on landscapes.<ref>{{cite web|title=Global Landscape Forum - the Investment Case speakers|url=http://www.landscapes.org/london-2016/speakers/|website=Global Landscape Forum}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=2014 Global Landscapes Forum Final Report|url=http://www.landscapes.org/publication/2014-global-landscapes-forum-final-report/|website=Global Landscapes Forum}}</ref> During the Livelihoods and Landscapes Strategies programme the [International Union for Conservation of Nature](/source/International_Union_for_Conservation_of_Nature) applied this approach to locations worldwide, in 27 landscapes in 23 different countries.<ref>{{cite report |date=2012 |title=Livelihoods and Landscapes Strategy - Results and Reflections |url=https://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/lls_final_report_public_1.pdf |publisher=IUCN |page=4 |isbn=978-2-8317-1548-3 |access-date=20 October 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150417065128/https://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/lls_final_report_public_1.pdf |archive-date=17 April 2015  }}</ref>

Examples of landscape approaches can be global<ref name="Reed" /><ref name="Minang" /><ref>Landscapes for People Food and nature case studies http://peoplefoodandnature.org/analysis/all-publications/case-studies/</ref> or continental, for example in Africa,<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Milder |first1=J C |last2=Hart |first2=A K |last3=Dobie |first3=P |last4=Minai |first4=J |last5=Zaleski |first5=C |title=Integrated landscape initiatives for African agriculture, development, and conservation: a region-wide assessment |journal=World Development |date=2014 |volume=54 |pages=68–80 |doi=10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.07.006}}</ref> Oceania<ref>{{cite web |url=https://livelihoodsandlandscapes.com/about/ |title=Livelihoods and Landscapes |author=<!--Not stated--> |publisher=Australian Centre for International Agriculture Research |access-date=20 October 2019 |archive-date=20 October 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191020213959/https://livelihoodsandlandscapes.com/about/ |url-status=dead }}</ref> and Latin America.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Estrada-Carmona |first1=N |last2=Hart |first2=A K |last3=Declerk |first3=F A J |last4=Harvey |first4=C A |last5=Milder |first5=J C |title=Integrated landscape management for agriculture, rural livelihoods, and ecosystem conservation: an assessment of experience from Latin America and the Caribbean |journal=Landscape and Urban Planning |date=2014 |volume=129 |pages=1–11 |doi=10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.05.001|doi-access=free |hdl=10568/66069 |hdl-access=free }}</ref> The [European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development](/source/European_Agricultural_Fund_for_Rural_Development) plays an important part in funding landscape conservation in Europe.<ref>Deutscher Verband für Landschaftspflege (DVL) e.&nbsp;V. (2008): Natur als Motor ländlicher Entwicklung, DVL Schriftenreihe „Landschaft als Lebensraum", Heft 14</ref>

=== Relevance to international commitments ===
Some argue landscape management can address the [Sustainable Development Goals](/source/Sustainable_Development_Goals).<ref name="learning" /><ref name="SDG briefing">{{cite press release |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |title=Integrated Landscape Management: The Means of Implementation for the Sustainable Development Goals - Policy Brief |url=http://peoplefoodandnature.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/ILM-for-the-SDGs-Two-Page-Statement-Sept-21-2015-FINAL-FINAL.pdf |agency=Landscapes for People Food and Nature |date=2015 |access-date=2019-10-19}}</ref><ref name="Reed J 2015">Reed J, van Vianen J, Sunderland T. 2015. From global complexity to local reality: Aligning implementation pathways for the Sustainable Development Goals and landscape approaches. Infobrief No. 129. Bogor, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research.</ref> Many of these goals have potential synergies or trade-offs: some therefore argue that addressing these goals individually may not be effective, and landscape approaches provide a potential framework to manage them. For example, increasing areas of irrigated agricultural land to end hunger could have adverse impacts on terrestrial ecosystems or sustainable water management.<ref name="Reed J 2015"/> Landscape approaches intend to include different sectors, and thus achieve the multiple objectives of the Sustainable Development Goals – for example, working within catchment area of a river to enhance agricultural productivity, flood defence, biodiversity and carbon storage.<ref name="LSLB" />

Climate change and agriculture are intertwined<ref>Beddington J, Asaduzzaman M, Fernandez A, Clark M, Guillou M, Jahn M, Erda L, Mamo T, Van Bo N, Nobre CA, Scholes R, Sharma R, Wakhungu J. 2011. Achieving food security in the face of climate change: Summary for policy makers from the Commission on Sustainable Agriculture and Climate Change. CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS), Copenhagen, Denmark https://cgspace.cgiar.org/bitstream/handle/10568/35589/climate_food_commission-final-mar2012.pdf?sequence=1 {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190926032147/https://cgspace.cgiar.org/bitstream/handle/10568/35589/climate_food_commission-final-mar2012.pdf?sequence=1 |date=2019-09-26 }},</ref> so production of food and climate mitigation can be a part of landscape management.<ref name="Smart ag">{{cite journal |last1=Scherr |first1=S |last2=Shames |first2=S |last3=Friedman |first3=R |title=From climate-smart agriculture to climate-smart landscapes |journal=Agriculture & Food Security |date=2012 |volume=1 |issue=12 |page=12 |doi=10.1186/2048-7010-1-12|doi-access=free }}</ref> The agricultural sector accounts for around 24% of [anthropogenic emissions](/source/Anthropogenic_greenhouse_gases). Unlike other sectors that emit greenhouse gases, agriculture and forestry have the potential to mitigate climate change by reducing or removing [greenhouse gas emission](/source/greenhouse_gas_emission)s, for example by [reforestation](/source/reforestation) and landscape restoration.<ref>Smith P., M. Bustamante, H. Ahammad, H. Clark, H. Dong, E. A. Elsiddig, H. Haberl, R. Harper, J. House, M. Jafari, O. Masera, C. Mbow, N. H. Ravindranath, C. W. Rice, C. Robledo  Abad, A. Romanovskaya, F. Sperling, and F. Tubiello, 2014: Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use (AFOLU). In: Climate Change 014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.</ref> Advocates of landscape management argue that '[climate-smart agriculture](/source/climate-smart_agriculture)' and [REDD+](/source/Reducing_emissions_from_deforestation_and_forest_degradation) can draw on landscape management.<ref name="Smart ag"/>

[[File:Kali_Gandaki_Valley227,_Nepal.JPG|thumb|upright|The marketing of products from specific landscapes can assist conservation. This is apple juice from [Tukuche](/source/Tukuche) village in the [Kali Gandaki Gorge](/source/Kali_Gandaki_Gorge), [Nepal](/source/Nepal)]]

==Regional==
===Germany===

Because a large proportion of the biodiversity of Germany was able to invade from the south and east after human activities altered the landscape, maintaining such artificial landscapes is an integral part of nature conservation.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.lpv-augsburg.de/landschaftspflege/ |title=Landschaftspflege |author=<!--Not stated--> |website=Landschaftspflegeverband Stadt Augsburg |publisher=Landschaftspflegeverbands Augsburg |language=de |access-date=31 July 2013}}</ref> The full name of the main nature conservation law in Germany, the ''Bundesnaturschutzgesetzes'', is thus titled in its entirety ''Gesetz über Naturschutz und Landschaftspflege'',<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.buzer.de/gesetz/8972/index.htm |title=BNatSchG Bundesnaturschutzgesetz |author=<!--Not stated--> |date=2006 |publisher=Gesetz über Naturschutz und Landschaftspflege |language=de |access-date=19 October 2019}}</ref> where [''Landschaftspflege''](/source/%3Ade%3ALandschaftspflege) translates literally to "landscape maintenance" (see reference for more).<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.dict.cc/german-english/Landschaftspflege.html |title=Landschaftspflege |last=Hemetsberger |first=Paul |date=2019 |website=dict.cc English-German Dictionary |publisher=Paul Hemetsberger |access-date=19 October 2019}}</ref> Related concepts are [''Landschaftsschutz''](/source/%3Ade%3ALandschaftsschutz), "landscape protection/conservation",<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.dict.cc/?s=Landschaftsschutz |title=Landschaftsschutz |last=Hemetsberger |first=Paul |date=2019 |website=dict.cc English-German Dictionary |publisher=Paul Hemetsberger |access-date=19 October 2019}}</ref> and [''Landschaftsschutzgebiet''](/source/%3Ade%3ALandschaftsschutzgebiet), a "nature preserve", or literally a (legally) "protected landscape area".<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.dict.cc/german-english/Landschaftsschutzgebiet.html |title=Landschaftsschutzgebiet |last=Hemetsberger |first=Paul |date=2019 |website=dict.cc English-German Dictionary |publisher=Paul Hemetsberger |access-date=19 October 2019}}</ref> The ''[Deutscher Verband für Landschaftspflege](/source/%3Ade%3ADeutscher_Verband_f%C3%BCr_Landschaftspflege)'' is the main organisation which protects landscapes in Germany. It is an umbrella organisation which coordinates the regional landscape protection organisations of the different [German states](/source/States_of_Germany).<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.lpv.de/ |title=Deutsche Verband für Landschaftspflege e.V. |author=<!--Not stated--> |date=2019 |publisher=Deutsche Verband für Landschaftspflege |access-date=20 October 2019}}</ref><ref name="DVL2000">{{cite book |date=2000 |title=Fortbildung zum Geprüften Natur- und Landschaftspfleger/zur Geprüften Natur und Landschaftspflegerin – Tätigkeit, Einsatzbereiche und Perspektiven in der Landschaftspflege, BfN-Skripten 24 |location=Bonn – Bad Godesberg |publisher=Deutscher Verband für Landschaftspflege (DVL) e.&nbsp;V. }}</ref> Classically, there are four methods which can be done in order to conserve landscapes:<ref>{{cite book |last=Hundsdorfer |first=M. |date=1988 |title=Studien zur Wirtschafts- und Organisationslehre der Landespflege Heft 2 - Aktive Landschaftspflege – Inhalte, Durchführung, Erhebung von Planungsdaten und Kostenkalkulation |location=Munich |publisher=Lehrstuhl für Wirtschaftslehre des Gartenbaues der TU München-Weihenstephan }}</ref><ref name="Jedicke96">Jedicke et al. (1996): Praktische Landschaftspflege – Grundlagen und Maßnahmen. Eugen Ulmer, Hohenheim</ref> maintenance,<ref name="DVL2000" /> improvement,<ref name="DVL2000" /> protection<ref name="DVL2000" /><ref name="Baals2010">Baals, C.(2010): Qualitätsmanagement in der aktiven Landschaftspflege – unter Berücksichtigung ihrer Entwicklung im Freistaat Bayern. Herbert Utz Verlag – Wissenschaft, München</ref> and redevelopment.<ref name="Baals2010" /> The marketing of products such as meat from alpine meadows or apple juice from traditional [''Streuobstwiese''](/source/Orchard) can also be an important factor in conservation.<ref name="DVL2000" /> Landscapes are maintained by three methods: biological - such as [grazing by livestock](/source/conservation_grazing), manually (although this is rare due to the high cost of labour) and commonly mechanically.<ref name="Jedicke96"/>

===The Netherlands===
{{multiple image
 |image1  =HYMAC 370C.FR.jpg
 |image2  =EresusSandaliatusHogeVeluwe.JPG
 |footer=The ladybird spider, ''[Eresus sandaliatus](/source/Eresus_sandaliatus)'' lives on inland shifting [dunes](/source/dunes), created by [forest clearance](/source/deforestation) and [overgrazing](/source/overgrazing) on poor, sandy soils. Today [backhoe loader](/source/backhoe_loader)s can scrape off topsoil, maintaining the low-nutrient soil that such heath and dune species need.<ref>{{cite report |author=Michel Riksen |author2=Laurens Sparrius |author3=Marijn Nijssen |author4=Marcel d'Anjou |date=2011 |title=Stuifzanden Advies voor beheer en herstel van stuifzanden |url=https://www.natuurkennis.nl/Uploaded_files/Publicaties/obn-brochure-stuifzanden.4f9fea.pdf |publisher=Kennisnetwerk Ontwikkeling + Beheer Natuurkwaliteit (O+BN) |page=22 |language=nl |access-date=21 October 2019}}</ref>
}}

''Staatsbosbeheer'', the Dutch governmental forest service, considers landscape management an important part of managing their lands.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.staatsbosbeheer.nl/over-staatsbosbeheer/dossiers/landschap/visie-en-beleid |title=Visie en beleid Landschap |author=<!--Not stated--> |date=2019 |publisher=Staatsbosbeheer |language=nl |access-date=17 October 2019 |quote=Landschappelijk en cultuurhistorische beheer heeft daarmee een volwaardige plaats in ons terreinbeheer. |archive-date=25 May 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190525065636/https://www.staatsbosbeheer.nl/Over-Staatsbosbeheer/Dossiers/landschap/visie-en-beleid |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>{{cite report |author=Moniek Nooren |date=March 2006 |title=Landschap leeft! Visie op ontwikkeling en beheer van het landschap bij Staatsbosbeheer |url=https://www.staatsbosbeheer.nl/-/media/08-dossiers/landschap/visie-landschap-leeft.pdf?la=nl-nl&hash=DC9F5CE7866FB6B75B6BD39A88F1EB0DC4D4E944 |publisher=Staatsbosbeheer |pages=1–40 |language=nl |access-date=17 October 2019 |archive-date=17 October 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191017175652/https://www.staatsbosbeheer.nl/-/media/08-dossiers/landschap/visie-landschap-leeft.pdf?la=nl-nl&hash=DC9F5CE7866FB6B75B6BD39A88F1EB0DC4D4E944 |url-status=dead }}</ref> [''Landschapsbeheer Nederland''](/source/%3Anl%3ALandschapsbeheer_Nederland) is an umbrella organisation which promotes and helps fund the interests of the different provincial landscape management organisations, which between them include 75,000 volunteers and 110,000 hectares of protected nature reserves.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.landschappen.nl/organisatie/over-landschappennl/ |title=Over LandschappenNL  |date=2019 |publisher=LandschappenNL |language=nl |access-date=17 October 2019}}</ref> Sustainable landscape management is being researched in the Netherlands.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.vhluniversity.com/research/delta-areas-and-resources-applied-research-centre/sustainable-landscape-management |title=Sustainable Landscape Management |author=<!--Not stated--> |publisher=Van Hall Larenstein |access-date=17 October 2019 |archive-date=17 October 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191017181322/https://www.vhluniversity.com/research/delta-areas-and-resources-applied-research-centre/sustainable-landscape-management |url-status=dead }}</ref>

===Peru===

An example of a producer movement managing a multi-functional landscape is the Potato Park in [Písac](/source/Pisac_District), Peru, where local communities protect the ecological and cultural diversity of the 12,000ha landscape.<ref name="Hart"/><ref name=IIED/>
[[File:Papa andina.jpg|thumb|A variety of Peruvian potatoes from the [Andes](/source/Andes)]]

===Sweden===
{{See also |Agricultural landscape of southern Öland}}
In Sweden, the Swedish National Heritage Board, or ''Riksantikvarieämbetet'', is responsible for landscape conservation.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.raa.se/kulturarv/landskap/landskapsvard/ |title=Landskapsvård |author=<!--Not stated--> |publisher=Riksantikvarieämbetet |language=sv |access-date=17 October 2019}}</ref> Landscape conservation can be studied at the Department of Cultural Conservation (at [Dacapo Mariestad](/source/%3Asv%3ADacapo)) of the University of Gothenburg, in both Swedish and English.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://utbildning.gu.se/program/programinriktning/?programid=N1TLH |title=Trädgårdens och landskapsvårdens hantverk, kandidatprogram, 180 hp |author=<!--Not stated--> |publisher=Göteborgs Universitetet |language=sv |access-date=17 October 2019 |archive-date=24 September 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170924034141/http://utbildning.gu.se/program/programinriktning/?programid=N1TLH |url-status=dead }}</ref>

===Thailand===

An example of cooperation between very different actors is from the [Doi Mae Salong](/source/Doi_Mae_Salong) watershed in northwest Thailand, a Military Reserved Area under the control of the [Royal Thai Armed Forces](/source/Royal_Thai_Armed_Forces). Reforestation activities led to tension with local [hill tribes](/source/Hill_tribe_(Thailand)). In response, an agreement was reached with them on land rights and use of different parts of the reserve.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Fisher |first1=R J |last2=Kugel |first2=C |last3=Rattanasorn |first3=T |title=Unusual partnerships: lessons for landscapes and livelihoods from the Doe Mae Salong landscape, Thailand. |url=https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/10215 |website=IUCN |isbn=978-2-8317-1498-1 |year=2012}}</ref>

{{wide image|2014 June 1, Mae Fa Luang District.jpg|750px|[Doi Mae Salong](/source/Doi_Mae_Salong) landscape in Thailand is managed by agreement between the [army](/source/Royal_Thai_Armed_Forces) and local [hill tribes](/source/Hill_tribe_(Thailand)).}}

===United Kingdom===

Among the leading exponents of UK landscape scale conservation are the [Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty](/source/Areas_of_Outstanding_Natural_Beauty) (AONB). There are 49 AONB in the UK. The [International Union for Conservation of Nature](/source/International_Union_for_Conservation_of_Nature) has categorised these regions as "category 5 protected areas" and in 2005 claimed the AONB are administered using what the IUCN coined the "protected landscape approach".<ref name="Phillips 2005">"Protected Areas in the United Kingdom" by Phillips, A. and Partington, R. in "The Protected Landscape Approach: Linking Nature, Culture and Community" Brown, J, Mitchell, N & Beresford, M (Eds) (2005) IUCN, Gland, Switzerland. pp 119-130.</ref> In Scotland there is a similar system of [national scenic area](/source/national_scenic_area)s.<ref name=SNH>{{cite web|url=https://www.nature.scot/professional-advice/safeguarding-protected-areas-and-species/protected-areas/national-designations/national-scenic-areas/|title=National Scenic Areas|publisher=Scottish Natural Heritage|access-date=2018-01-17}}</ref>

The UK [Biodiversity Action Plan](/source/Biodiversity_Action_Plan) protects semi-natural grasslands, among other habitats, which constitute landscapes maintained by [low-intensity grazing](/source/extensive_agriculture). Agricultural environment schemes reward farmers and land managers financially for maintaining these habitats on registered agricultural land. Each of the four
countries in the UK has its own individual scheme.<ref>{{cite report |author=James M. Bullock |author2=Richard G. Jefferson |author3=Tim H. Blackstock |author4=Robin J. Pakeman |author5=Bridget A. Emmett |author6=Richard J. Pywell |author7=J. Philip Grime |author8=Jonathan Silvertown |date=June 2011 |title=UK National Ecosystem Assessment: Technical Report |url=http://uknea.unep-wcmc.org/ |chapter=Chapter 6 - Semi-natural Grasslands |chapter-url=http://uknea.unep-wcmc.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=Y4pLIpagaf0%3d&tabid=82 |publisher=UN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre |pages=162, 165, 167 |access-date=17 October 2019 |archive-date=4 May 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150504143732/http://uknea.unep-wcmc.org/ |url-status=dead }}</ref>

Studies have been carried out across the UK looking at much wider range of habitats. In [Wales](/source/Wales) the [Pumlumon](/source/Plynlimon) Large Area Conservation Project focusses on upland conservation in areas of marginal agriculture and forestry.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.montwt.co.uk/pumlumon.html|title = Pumlumon Project &#124; Montgomeryshire Wildlife Trust}}</ref> The North [Somerset](/source/Somerset) Levels and [Moors](/source/moorland) Project addresses wetlands.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.avonwildlifetrust.org.uk/level1/level2/project_nslm.htm |title=North Somerset Levels and Moors Project |access-date=2007-03-28 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070428170209/http://www.avonwildlifetrust.org.uk/level1/level2/project_nslm.htm |archive-date=2007-04-28 }}</ref>

===Other===
[[File:Kiiji, Haratani village 02.jpg|thumb|The landscape to the left is known as ''[satoyama](/source/satoyama)''; a traditional human-influenced secondary forest bordering agricultural fields in Japan. The [''satoyama'' conservation movement](/source/Satoyama) spread in the 1980s in Japan and by 2001 there were more than 500 environmental groups involved.<ref>Takeuchi Kazuhiko, Wahitani Izumi and Tsunekawa Atsushi (2001). Satoyama: The Traditional Rural Landscape of Japan. University Tokyo Press 133–135 {{ISBN|4-13-060301-9}}</ref>]]
Landscape approaches have been taken up by governments in for example the [Greater Mekong Subregion](/source/Greater_Mekong_Subregion) project<ref name="GMS BLL">{{cite web|title=Biodiversity Landscapes and Livelihoods|url=http://www.gms-eoc.org/biodiversity-conservation-corridors-initiative|website=Greater Mekong Subregion - Core Environment Program}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=GMS Workshop on Landscape Approaches|url=http://www.gms-eoc.org/events/gms-workshop-on-landscape-approaches|website=Greater Mekong Subregion - Core Environment Program}}</ref> and in Indonesia's [climate change commitments](/source/Paris_Agreement),<ref name="IINDC">{{cite web |last1=Republic of Indonesia |title=Intended Nationally Determined Contribution |url=http://www4.unfccc.int/submissions/INDC/Published%20Documents/Indonesia/1/INDC_REPUBLIC%20OF%20INDONESIA.pdf |date=2015 |website=UNFCCC submissions}}</ref> and by international research bodies such as the [Center for International Forestry Research](/source/Center_for_International_Forestry_Research),<ref name="CIFOR landscapes pg">{{cite web |last1=Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR)|url=http://www.cifor.org/sustainable-landscapes/ |website=Sustainable Landscapes|title=Sustainable Landscapes}}</ref> which convenes the Global Landscapes Forum.<ref name="GLF homepage">{{cite web|url=http://www.landscapes.org/|website=Global Landscapes Forum |title=Home}}</ref>

The [Mount Kailash](/source/Mount_Kailash) region is where the [Indus River](/source/Indus_River), the [Karnali River](/source/Karnali_River) (a major tributary of the [Ganges River](/source/Ganges_River)), the [Brahmaputra River](/source/Brahmaputra_River) and the [Sutlej](/source/Sutlej) river systems originate. With assistance from the International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development, the three surrounding countries (China, India and Nepal) developed an integrated management approach to the different conservation and development issues within this landscape.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Wallrapp |first1=C |title=Transboundary landscape management in the Kailash Sacred Landscape |url=http://peoplefoodandnature.org/blog/transboundary-landscape-management-in-the-kailash-sacred-landscape/ |publisher=Landscapes for People Food and Nature |date=2015-12-03}}</ref>

Six countries in [West Africa](/source/West_Africa) in the [Volta River](/source/Volta_River) basin using the 'Mapping Ecosystems Services to Human well-being' toolkit, use landscape modelling of alternative scenarios for the riparian buffer to make land-use decisions such as conserving hydrological [ecosystem services](/source/ecosystem_services) and meeting national [SDG commitments](/source/Sustainable_development_goals).<ref>{{cite web |last1=Wood |first1=S |last2=Jones |first2=S |title=Balancing multiple SDG-related outcomes of riparian buffers in the Volta Basin |url=http://peoplefoodandnature.org/blog/balancing-multiple-sdg-related-outcomes-of-riparian-buffers-in-the-volta-basin/ |publisher=Landscapes for People Food and Nature |date=2015-11-27}}</ref>

==Variations==
===Ecoagriculture===
In a 2001 article published by Sara J. Scherr and Jeffrey McNeely,<ref name=McNeely2001>{{cite book |last1=McNeely |first1=Jeffrey A. |last2=Scherr |first2=Sara J. |title=Common Ground, Common Future |date=2001 |url=http://www.ecoagriculturepartners.org/documents/reports/FinalPrintingReport2.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080516213355/http://www.ecoagriculturepartners.org/documents/reports/FinalPrintingReport2.pdf  |archive-date=2008-05-16 }}</ref> soon expanded into a book,<ref name=McNeely2003>{{cite book |last1=McNeely |first1=Jeffrey A. |last2=Scherr |first2=Sara J. |title=Ecoagriculture: Strategies to Feed the World and Save Wild Biodiversity |publisher=[Island Press](/source/Island_Press) |date=2003 |isbn=978-1-55963-645-2 |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/ecoagriculturest0000mcne }}</ref> Scherr and McNeely introduced the term "ecoagriculture" to describe their vision of rural development while advancing the environment, claim that agriculture is the dominant influence on wild species and habitats, and point to a number of recent and potential future developments they identified as beneficial examples of land use.<ref name=McNeely2001/><ref name=Scherr2013>{{cite journal |last1=Scherr |first1=Sara J. |last2=Shames |first2=S. |last3=Friedman |first3=R. |title=Defining Integrated Landscape Management for Policy Makers |journal=Ecoagriculture Policy Focus |date=2013 |issue=10 |url=http://ecoagriculture.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/DefiningILMforPolicyMakers.pdf |archive-date=2017-01-26 |access-date=2019-10-17 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170126010246/http://ecoagriculture.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/DefiningILMforPolicyMakers.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> They incorporated the non-profit [EcoAgriculture Partners](/source/EcoAgriculture_Partners).<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ecoagriculture.org |title=EcoAgriculture Partners |access-date=14 October 2019}}</ref> in 2004 to promote this vision, with Scherr as President and CEO, and McNeely as an independent governing board member. Scherr and McNeely edited a second book in 2007.<ref name="Scherr 2007">{{cite book | last=Scherr | first=Sara | title=Farming with nature: the science and practice of ecoagriculture | publisher=[Island Press](/source/Island_Press) | location=Washington | year=2007 | isbn=978-1-59726-128-9 | oclc=427509919 }}</ref> Ecoagriculture had three elements in 2003.<ref name=McNeely2003/>

===Integrated landscape management===
In 2012 Scherr invented a new term, integrated landscape management(ILM), to describe her ideas for developing entire regions, not at just a farm or plot level.<ref name=Scherr2013/><ref name="LSLB"/> Integrated landscape management is a way of managing [sustainable](/source/sustainable) landscapes by bringing together multiple stakeholders with different land use objectives. The integrated approach claims to go beyond other approaches which focus on users of the land independently of each other, despite needing some of the same resources.<ref name="LSLB" /> It is promoted by the conservation NGOs [Worldwide Fund for Nature](/source/Worldwide_Fund_for_Nature), Global Canopy Programme, [The Nature Conservancy](/source/The_Nature_Conservancy), The Sustainable Trade Initiative, and EcoAgriculture Partners.<ref name="LSLB" /> Promoters claim that integrated landscape management will maximise collaboration in planning, policy development and action regarding the interdependent [Sustainable Development Goals](/source/Sustainable_Development_Goals).<ref name="SDG briefing" /> It was defined by four elements in 2013:<ref name="Scherr">{{cite journal|last1=Scherr|first1=S J|last2=Shames|first2=S|last3=Friedman|first3=R|title=Defining Integrated Landscape Management for Policy Makers|journal=Ecoagriculture Policy Focus|date=2013|issue=10|url=http://ecoagriculture.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/DefiningILMforPolicyMakers.pdf|archive-date=2017-01-26|access-date=2019-10-17|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170126010246/http://ecoagriculture.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/DefiningILMforPolicyMakers.pdf|url-status=dead}}</ref>

# Large scale: It plans land uses at the landscape scale. Wildlife population dynamics and watershed functions can only be understood at the landscape scale. Assuming short-term trade-offs may lead to long-term synergies, conducting analyses over long time periods is advocated.
# Emphasis on synergies: It tries to exploit "synergies" among conservation, agricultural production, and rural livelihoods. 
# Emphasis on collaboration: It can not be achieved by individuals. The management of landscapes require different land managers with different environmental and socio-economic goals to achieve conservation, production, and livelihood goals at a landscape scale.
# Importance of both conservation and agricultural production: bringing conservation into the agricultural and rural development discourse by highlighting the importance of ecosystem services in supporting agricultural production. It supports conservationists to more effectively conserve nature within and outside protected areas by working with the agricultural community by developing conservation-friendly livelihoods for rural land users.

By 2016 it had five elements, namely:

# stakeholders come together for cooperative dialogue and action; 
# they exchange information systematically and discuss perspectives to achieve a shared understanding of the landscape conditions, challenges and opportunities; 
# collaborative planning to develop an agreed action plan; 
# implementation of the plan; 
# monitoring and dialogue to adapt management.<ref name="LSLB"/>

===Ecosystem approach===
The [ecosystem approach](/source/ecosystem_approach), promoted by the [Convention on Biological Diversity](/source/Convention_on_Biological_Diversity), is a strategy for the integrated [ecosystem management](/source/ecosystem_management) of land, water, and living resources for conservation and sustainability.<ref>{{cite web|title=Ecosystem Approach Introduction|date=23 August 2021|url=https://www.cbd.int/ecosystem/|publisher=CBD}}</ref>

===Ten Principles===

This approach includes continual learning and [adaptive management](/source/adaptive_management): including monitoring, the expectation that actions take place at multiple scales and that landscapes are multifunctional (e.g. supplying both goods, such as timber and food, and services, such as water and biodiversity protection). There are multiple stakeholders, and it assumes they have a common concern about the landscape, negotiate change with each other, and their rights and responsibilities are clear or will become clear.<ref name="Ten P">{{cite journal|last1=Sayer|first1=J|last2=Sunderland|first2=T|last3=Ghazoul|first3=J|display-authors=etal|title=Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture, conservation, and other competing land uses|journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA|date=2013|volume=110|issue=21|pages=8349–8356|doi=10.1073/pnas.1210595110|pmid=23686581|url=http://www.cifor.org/publications/pdf_files/articles/ASunderland1302.pdf|pmc=3666687|bibcode=2013PNAS..110.8349S|doi-access=free}}</ref>

==Criticisms==
A literature review identified five main barriers, as follows:<ref name="learning" />

# Terminology confusion: the variety of definitions creates confusion and resistance to engage. This resistance has emerged, often independently, from different fields.<ref name="Reed" /><ref name="learning" /> As stated by Scherr ''et al''.: "People are talking about the same thing ... This can lead to fragmentation of knowledge, unnecessary re-invention of ideas and practices, and inability to mobilize action at scale. ... this rich diversity is often simply overwhelming: they receive confusing messages"<ref name="Scherr" /> This problem is not unique to landscape approaches: since the 1970s it has been recognised that the constant emergence of new terminology can be harmful if they promote rhetoric at the expense of action.<ref name="ODI">{{cite journal|last1=Overseas Development Institute|title=Integrated Rural Development|journal=ODI Briefing Paper|date=1979|issue=4|url=https://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/6626.pdf}}</ref> Because landscapes approaches develop from, and aim to integrate, a wide variety of sectors, makes it vulnerable to overlapping definitions and parallel concepts.<ref name="Scherr" /> Like other approaches to conservation, it may be a fad.<ref name="fads">{{cite journal|last1=Redford|first1=K|last2=Padoch|first2=C|last3=Sunderland|first3=T|title=Fads, funding and forgetting in three decades of conservation|journal=Conservation Biology|date=2013|volume=27|issue=3|pages=437–438|doi=10.1111/cobi.12071|pmid=23692015|doi-access=free}}</ref>
# Time lags: substantial time and resources are invested in developing and planning, while resources are inadequate for implementation.<ref name="learning" /><ref name="Sayer" /> 
# Operating silos: Each sector pursues its goals without giving consideration to the others. This may arise because of a lack in established objectives, operating norms and funding that effectively bridge different sectors.<ref name="learning" /> Working across sectors at the landscape scale requires a range of skills, different from those traditionally used by conservation organisations.<ref name="Sayer" />  
# Engagement: Stakeholders may not desire to be engaged in the process,<ref name="LSLB" /><ref name="Reed" /> engagement may be trivial or inaccessible,<ref name="learning" /> and the discussions may hinder efficient decision-making.<ref name="LSLB" /> 
# Monitoring: There is lack of monitoring to check whether the objectives have been achieved.<ref name="learning" />

==See also==
{{Portal|Agriculture and Agronomy|Agropedia|Earth sciences|Ecology|Trees}}
* [Agriculture in Concert with the Environment](/source/Agriculture_in_Concert_with_the_Environment)
* [Agroecology](/source/Agroecology)
* [Agroforestry](/source/Agroforestry)
* [Anthropogenic biome](/source/Anthropogenic_biome)
* [Conservation development](/source/Conservation_development)
* [Ecosystem approach](/source/Ecosystem_approach)
* [Global biodiversity](/source/Global_biodiversity)
* [Landscape ecology](/source/Landscape_ecology)
* [Multifunctional landscape](/source/Multifunctional_landscape)
* [Working landscape](/source/Working_landscape)
* [Landscape Institute](/source/Landscape_Institute)
* [Landscape urbanism](/source/Landscape_urbanism)
* [Polder model](/source/Polder_model)
* [Sustainable forest management](/source/Sustainable_forest_management)
* [Sustainable landscaping](/source/Sustainable_landscaping)
* [Topocide](/source/Topocide)
* [Watershed management](/source/Watershed_management)

==References==

{{Reflist|30em}}

==External links==
*[http://www.civilscape.eu/ CIVILSCAPE - We are the landscape people!] (CIVILSCAPE)
*[http://www.landscape-europe.net/index.php/home Landscape Europe]
*[http://landscapecharacter.org.uk/ Landscape Character Network]

{{conservation of species}}
{{Sustainability}}
{{Authority control}}

Category:Landscape ecology
Category:Natural resource management
Category:Sustainable design
Category:Environmental conservation

---
Adapted from the Wikipedia article [Landscape-scale conservation](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landscape-scale_conservation) by Wikipedia contributors ([contributor history](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landscape-scale_conservation?action=history)). Available under [Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Changes may have been made.