# Klamelia

> Mediated Wiki article. Canonical URL: https://mediated.wiki/source/Klamelia
> Markdown URL: https://mediated.wiki/source/Klamelia.md
> Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Klamelia
> Source revision: 1355620408
> License: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/)

***Klamelia***, named after the district in which it was found, is an extinct [Eutriconodontid](/source/Eutriconodonta) of the family [Klameliidae](/source/Klameliidae). It inhabited northwestern [China](/source/China) during the [Late Jurassic](/source/Late_Jurassic) ([Oxfordian age](/source/Oxfordian_(stage))).[1][2] *Klamelia* was discovered in 1984 and is known from highly fragmentary remains, with only a [dentary](/source/Mandible) and some of its associated [teeth](/source/Tooth) being found.[2][3] There is only one accepted species of *Klamelia*, *K. zhaopengi*, which is named after [Zhao Xijin](/source/Zhao_Xijin) and [Peng Xiling](/source/Peng_Xiling), paleontologists who collected the [holotype](/source/Holotype) specimen.[1]

## Discovery

The remains of *Klamelia* were discovered by Zhao Xijin in 1980.[2] It was found in basal section of the [Shishugou Group](/source/Shishugou_Group) in [Xinjiang](/source/Xinjiang) province of China.[2] Chow and Rich described *Klamelia* in 1984.[3] The type specimen, IVPP V6447, is the property of the [Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology](/source/Institute_of_Vertebrate_Paleontology_and_Paleoanthropology) in [Beijing](/source/Beijing).[1] Despite another attempt to find fossils in the area in 2003, no more remains of *Klamelia* have been discovered.[4]

## Classification

When Chow and Rich described *Klamelia*, they determined it to be closely related to *[Gobiconodon](/source/Gobiconodon)* due to various [synapomorphies](/source/Apomorphy_and_synapomorphy), notably the shortening of the mandible and reduction of pre-molar teeth to six or less.[1] Thus, they created the new subfamily [Gobiconodontidae](/source/Gobiconodontidae) to include *Gobiconodon*, *Guchinodon* (now *Gobiconodon*), and *Klamelia*.[3][5] Jenkins and Schaff (1988) subsequently changed Gobiconodontidae from subfamily to family status, but excluded Klamelia from the family in their description of *Gobiconodon ostromi*.[5][6] Rougier et al. (2001) found that *Klamelia* was a [mammaliaform](/source/Mammaliaformes) of uncertain position after discovering *Gobiconodon hopsoni*.[3] *Klamelia* was found to be a mammaliaform, however, primarily because of the reassessment of Gobiconodontidae as mammaliaformes.[7] They also noted that the foreshortening of the mandible noted by Chow and Rich to be an indicator of derived features could be incorrect if the last premolar was, as they determined it, a double rooted canine.[7] In 2004, Kielan Jaworowska et al. corroborated the findings of Jenkins and Schaff, finding *Klamelia* to be a basal Eutriconodontid.[5] In 2006, the newly discovered *[Ferganodon](/source/Ferganodon)* was found to be the closest relative of *Klamelia* due to multiple similarities in tooth topography.[8] Thus, Klameliidae was created to contain *Klamelia* and the newly-found *Ferganodon*.[3][8] The same study found that *Klameliidae* was most closely related to Gobiconodontidae.[8]

## Phylogeny

When *Klamelia* was described, Chow and Rich created the subfamily [Gobiconodontidae](/source/Gobiconodontidae). They found *Klamelia* to be the most derived member due to the shortening of the jaw, but they also found it to be the youngest member of Gobiconodontidae. Chow and Rich found Gobiconodontidae to be a basal clade within Triconodonta (now known as [Eutriconodonta](/source/Eutriconodonta)), and was subsequently placed within [Amphilestidae](/source/Amphilestidae).[1]

Below is the [cladogram](/source/Cladogram) created from the results of Chow and Rich, 1984.[1]

After the description of *Ferganodon* in 2006 by Martin and Averianov, 2006, the position of *Klamelia* was reassessed. Due to *Ferganodon* and *Klamelia* have many [synapomorphies](/source/Apomorphy_and_synapomorphy) in their teeth, most notably the teeth being shaped roughly as a parallelogram, *Ferganodon* was placed as the closest ancestor to *Klamelia*, and the new family Klameliidae was erected. The study which described *Ferganodon* found that it contained more [plesiomorphies](/source/Plesiomorphy_and_symplesiomorphy) than *Klamelia* and consequently placed it as the more basal member of Klameliidae. Klameliidae is most closely related to the Gobiconodonts.[8]

Below is the cladogram based on the findings of Martin and Averianov, 2006.[8]

## Description

*Klamelia* is distinguished from other Eutriconodonts by having at least six lower [molars](/source/Molar_(tooth)), fusion of the [mandible](/source/Mandible) extending to below the point of contact between the second and third molars, and the furthest back [premolar](/source/Premolar) significantly larger than the second molar. *Klamelia* is also distinguished from basal mammaliaformes by significant differences in their teeth compared to more basal mammaliaformes.[1]

### Mandible

The mandible displays characteristics which suggests that it was shortened; the first being that the posterior border of the mandibular fusion only stops below the second and the third molar and the second being that the posterior region of the midline symphysis is steeply inclined. The second characteristic indicates that the mandible did not extend much further than the last premolar. Therefore, there would be a reduced number of molars in the jaw, just like in *Gobiconodon*.[1]

### Teeth

The teeth increase in size in the posterior portions of the mandible. There are four large [cusps](/source/Cusp_(anatomy)) on the teeth which are arranged in a straight line, however this could be in part due to warping during [fossilization](/source/Fossil). The third cusp, going from front to back, is the largest by a wide margin. The next largest cusp is the second, with the fourth being slightly smaller. The shortest in the frontmost cusp. Ridges of enamel on the tongue side of the tooth are large and continuous on the molars. Ridges of enamel on the cheek side of the tooth are only well developed at the front and back of the molars. The molars overlap each other slightly. To accommodate this, each molar is rotated slightly.[1]

## See also

- [Glossary of mammalian dental topography](/source/Glossary_of_mammalian_dental_topography)
- [Mesozoic](/source/Mesozoic)

## References

1. Chow, Minchen & Rich, Thomas H. V. (1984). ["A New Triconodontan (Mammalia) from the Jurassic of China"](https://www.jstor.org/stable/4522957). *Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology*. **3** (4): 226–231. [Bibcode:1984JVPal...3..226C](https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1984JVPal...3..226C). [doi:10.1080/02724634.1984.10011979](https://doi.org/10.1080/02724634.1984.10011979). [ISSN 0272-4634](https://www.worldcat.org/issn/0272-4634). [JSTOR 4522957](https://www.jstor.org/stable/4522957)

1. Fakui, Zhang (January 1984). ["THE FOSSIL RECORD OF MESOZOIC MAMMALS IN CHINA"](https://www.naturalhistory.si.edu/sites/default/files/media/translated_publications/Zhang_84.pdf)

1. Xing, Xu; Clark, James; Eberth, David; Currie, Phillip (2022). ["The Shishugou Fauna of the Middle–Late Jurassic Transition Period in the Junggar Basin of Western China"](https://par.nsf.gov/servlets/purl/10382909)

1. ["Clark - Xinjiang 2003"](https://www2.gwu.edu/~clade/faculty/clark/2003.html). *www2.gwu.edu*. Retrieved 2025-04-27.

1. Sweetman, Steven (2006). ["A GOBICONODONTID (MAMMALIA, EUTRICONODONTA) FROM THE EARLY CRETACEOUS (BARREMIAN) WESSEX FORMATION OF THE ISLE OF WIGHT, SOUTHERN BRITAIN"](https://pure.port.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/6060515/Appendix_c.pdf). *School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Portsmouth*

1. Jenkins, Farish A. & Schaff, Charles R. (1988). ["The Early Cretaceous Mammal Gobiconodon (Mammalia, Triconodonta) from the Cloverly Formation in Montana"](https://www.jstor.org/stable/4523172). *Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology*. **8** (1): 1–24. [Bibcode:1988JVPal...8....1J](https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1988JVPal...8....1J). [doi:10.1080/02724634.1988.10011681](https://doi.org/10.1080/02724634.1988.10011681). [ISSN 0272-4634](https://www.worldcat.org/issn/0272-4634). [JSTOR 4523172](https://www.jstor.org/stable/4523172)

1. Rougier, Guillermo W.; Rougier, Guillermo W.; Novacek, Michael J.; McKenna, Malcolm C.; Wible, John R.; Project, Mongolian-American Museum Paleontological; Akademi, Mongolyn Shinzhlėkh Ukhaany (2001). [*Gobiconodonts from the early Cretaceous of Oshih (Ashile), Mongolia*](https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/293538#page/15/mode/1up). Vol. 3348 (2001). New York, NY: American Museum of Natural History.

1. Martin, Thomas & Averianov, Alexander (22 September 2006). ["A previously unrecognized group of Middle Jurassic triconodontan mammals from Central Asia"](https://doc.rero.ch/record/16175/files/PAL_E3379.pdf)

---
Adapted from the Wikipedia article [Klamelia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Klamelia) by Wikipedia contributors ([contributor history](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Klamelia?action=history)). Available under [Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Changes may have been made.