# Georgia Platform

> Mediated Wiki article. Canonical URL: https://mediated.wiki/source/Georgia_Platform
> Markdown URL: https://mediated.wiki/source/Georgia_Platform.md
> Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_Platform
> Source revision: 1348437814
> License: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/)

The **Georgia Platform** was a statement executed by a [Georgia](/source/Georgia_(U.S._state)) Convention in [Milledgeville, Georgia](/source/Milledgeville%2C_Georgia) on December 10, 1850, in response to the [Compromise of 1850](/source/Compromise_of_1850). Supported by [Unionists](/source/Union_(American_Civil_War)), the document affirmed the acceptance of the Compromise as a final resolution of the sectional [slavery issues](/source/Slavery_in_the_United_States) while declaring that no further assaults on the legality of slavery by the North would be acceptable. The Platform had political significance throughout the South. In the short term it was an effective antidote to [secession](/source/Secession_in_the_United_States), but in the long run it contributed to sectional solidarity and the demise of the [Second Party System](/source/Second_Party_System) in the South. Much of the document was written by [Charles J. Jenkins](/source/Charles_J._Jenkins), a [Whig](/source/Whig_Party_(United_States)) lawyer and state legislator from [Augusta](/source/Augusta%2C_Georgia).[1]

## Background

Part of a series on Forced labour and slavery Contemporary Child labour Child soldiers Conscription CSEC Debt bondage India Forced marriage Bride buying Child marriage Wife selling Forced prostitution Human trafficking Child China Cybersex Europe Fraud factory India United States Involuntary servitude ... in 21st-century jihadism ... in Africa Peonage Penal labour United States Sex trafficking China Europe United States Sexual slavery Wage slavery Historical Antiquity Babylonia Egypt Greece Rome Medieval Europe Ancillae Black Sea slave trade Byzantine Empire Genoese slave trade Kholop Prague slave trade Serfs History In Russia Emancipation Thrall Venetian slave trade Balkan slave trade Muslim world Baqt Barbary Coast slave trade pirates Sack of Baltimore Slave raid of Suðuroy Turkish Abductions Bukhara slave trade Concubinage history Ma malakat aymanukum Avret Pazarları Harem Abbasid harem Ottoman Imperial Harem Safavid imperial harem Qajar harem Jarya/Cariye Odalisque Qiyan Umm al-walad Circassian slave trade Contract of manumission Crimean slave trade Kafala system Kazakh raids into Russia Khazar slave trade Khivan slave trade Ottoman Empire Avret Pazarları Saqaliba Slavery in the Abbasid Caliphate Slavery in al-Andalus Slavery in the Rashidun Caliphate Slavery in the Umayyad Caliphate Slavery in the Abbasid Caliphate Volga Bulgarian slave trade 21st century Atlantic slave trade Brazil Bristol Database Dutch Middle Passage Nantes New France Panyarring Spanish Empire Slave Coast Thirteen colonies Topics and practice Blackbirding Child soldiers Conscription Devshirme Ghilman Mamluk Coolie Corvée labour Drapetomania Dysaesthesia aethiopica Field slaves in the United States Treatment Gladiator Gladiatrix House slaves Planter class Proslavery thought Saqaliba Seasoning Slave market Slave Power Slave raiding Slavocracy Voluntary slavery White slavery Naval Galley slave Impressment Pirates Shanghaiing Slave ship By country or region Sub-Saharan Africa Contemporary Africa Trans-Saharan slave trade Red Sea slave trade Indian Ocean slave trade Zanzibar slave trade Angola Chad Comoros Ethiopia Mali Mauritania Niger Nigeria Seychelles Somali slave trade Slavery in Kenya South Africa Sudan Zanzibar North and South America Pre-Columbian America Aztec Americas Indigenous U.S. Natives United States field slaves female contemporary maps partus prison labour slave codes treatment interregional proslavery sexual slavery The Bahamas Canada Caribbean Barbados British Virgin Islands Trinidad Code Noir Latin America Brazil Lei Áurea Colombia Cuba Haiti revolt Restavek (Encomienda) Puerto Rico East, Southeast, and South Asia Haruwa-charuwa Human trafficking in Southeast Asia Bhutan Brunei China Booi Aha Eunuchs Laogai penal system India Debt bondage Chukri System Bawi system Indonesia Japan comfort women Karayuki-san Korea Kwalliso Nobi Malaysia Maldives Slavery in the Mongol Empire Thailand Yankee princess Vietnam Australia and Oceania Australia Human trafficking Blackbirding Slave raiding in Easter Island Human trafficking in Papua New Guinea Blackbirding in Polynesia Europe and North Asia Sex trafficking in Europe United Kingdom Penal Labour Slavery Albania Bulgaria Denmark Dutch Republic Finland France Georgia Germany in World War II Hungary Malta Norway Poland Portugal Romania Russia Serbia Spain Sweden Switzerland North Africa and West Asia Afghanistan Bacha bazi Algeria Bahrain Egypt Human trafficking in the Middle East Iran Iraq Jordan Kuwait Lebanon Libya Morocco Oman Palestine Saudi Arabia Syria Tunisia Qatar Yemen United Arab Emirates Religion Bible Christianity Catholicism Mormonism Islam Judaism Zoroastrianism Baháʼí Faith Opposition and resistance Abolitionism U.K. U.S. Brussels Anti-Slavery Conference 1889–90 Temporary Slavery Commission 1926 Slavery Convention Committee of Experts on Slavery Advisory Committee of Experts on Slavery Ad Hoc Committee on Slavery Supplementary Convention on the Abolition of Slavery Abolitionists Anglo-Egyptian Slave Trade Convention Anti-Slavery International Blockade of Africa U.K. U.S. Colonization Liberia Sierra Leone Compensated emancipation Freedman Manumission Freedom suit Slave Power Underground Railroad songs Slave rebellion Slave Trade Acts International law Third Servile War 13th Amendment to the United States Constitution Timeline of abolition of slavery and serfdom Abolition of slave trade in Persian gulf [fa] Related Black triangle (badge) Common law Critique of political economy Critique of work Extermination through labour Forced labour Forced Labour Convention Fugitive slaves laws convention Great Dismal Swamp maroons Indentured servitude Infinite workday List of slaves owners last survivors of American slavery List of slavery-related memorials and museums Refusal of work Right to rest and leisure Slave catcher Slave marriages in the United States Slave narrative films songs Slave name Slave patrol Slave Route Project breeding court cases Washington Jefferson J.Q. Adams Lincoln Emancipation Proclamation 40 acres Freedmen's Bureau Iron bit Emancipation Day v t e

Sectional tensions over the issue of the westward expansion of slavery, previously resolved by the [Missouri Compromise](/source/Missouri_Compromise), were reawakened with the debate over Texas Annexation and the [Mexican War](/source/Mexican%E2%80%93American_War). [Texas Annexation](/source/Texas_Annexation) was the major issue in the national elections of 1844, but, despite some signs of a sectional split, the election was resolved along the established party lines. Opposition to the Mexican War and, especially, opposition to acquiring new territory, also split largely along party lines.

It was only with the introduction of the [Wilmot Proviso](/source/Wilmot_Proviso) in August 1846 that the national debate began to split along sectional lines. During the "prolonged deadlock of 1846-50" the idea of secession as a possible solution to Northern threats against slavery began to take root among more and more Southerners.[2] In December 1849 Congressman [Alexander Stephens](/source/Alexander_Stephens), the future vice-president of the Confederacy, wrote to his brother, "I find the feeling among the Southern members for a dissolution of the Union – if the antislavery [measures] should be pressed to extremity – is becoming more general than at first."[3]

In the United States Congress the issues dividing North and South were debated ferociously, leading to the [Compromise of 1850](/source/Compromise_of_1850) that was intended to address all outstanding issues relating to slavery. After an early failure to pass a single omnibus bill, in September 1850 President [Millard Fillmore](/source/Millard_Fillmore) signed the five separate bills that made up the compromise.

Around the same time, radicals within the South pursued their own solution, leading to the [Nashville Convention](/source/Nashville_Convention) in June 1850 that some hoped would become a secessionist convention. The convention denounced the proposed compromise, but rejected secession over any territorial restrictions on slavery in favor of extending the Missouri Compromise line to the west coast.

## Unionists versus Southern Rights Parties

Secessionist strength was strongest in Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, and South Carolina. In the first three of these states there arose local Union or Constitutional Parties to counter the radical Southern Rights parties which were forming. In South Carolina the Southern Rights agenda was already the dominant force in the state, and its leaders were already pressing the other states for secession. The new Union parties attracted the overwhelming majority of Whigs in the three states. In Alabama and Mississippi the Whigs had been weak, and the creation of the Union parties revitalized the opposition to the dominant state Democratic Parties.[4][5]

In Alabama, the state divided along sectional lines. In the north of the state the pro-compromise Union Party had its greatest strength while Democrats in the south organized the Southern Rights Party.[6]

In Mississippi, Governor [John Quitman](/source/John_Quitman) and [Jefferson Davis](/source/Jefferson_Davis) led the Southern rights group, while Senator [Henry S. Foote](/source/Henry_S._Foote), who had lost status in the state over his support for the compromise, was the most visible face of the Union Party.

Georgia had a strong Whig Party led by Alexander Stephens and [Robert Toombs](/source/Robert_Toombs). They had already led a Whig revolt against President [Zachary Taylor](/source/Zachary_Taylor) although they ended up supporting the compromise (although both voted against the bill abolishing the slave trade in the District of Columbia). They were joined in their state efforts to form the Constitutional Union Party by moderate Democrat [Howell Cobb](/source/Howell_Cobb). Their opposition came from Democratic Governor [George Towns](/source/George_W._Towns) and [Hershel V. Johnson](/source/Herschel_Vespasian_Johnson) and fellow Whig [John M. Berrien](/source/John_M._Berrien).[7][8][9]

After the final approval of the bills making up the Compromise of 1850, the radicals acted. In Mississippi, Governor Quitman called for a special legislative session in November to discuss the state's reaction to the compromise. The Nashville Convention reconvened in November, but it was poorly attended and accomplished nothing. In South Carolina, there was already a regular legislative session scheduled for November, and Governor [Whitemarsh Seabrook](/source/Whitemarsh_Seabrook) was persuaded not to take any special actions that might evoke the memories of South Carolina extremism during the Nullification Crisis.[10] However, the most significant action would occur in Georgia.

## Georgia Acts

[Governor Towns](/source/George_W._Towns) of Georgia, acting under the instructions of the state legislature, called for a special election to a state convention. The convention, scheduled for November, was intended to determine the appropriate response to the Compromise of 1850.

[Robert Barnwell Rhett](/source/Robert_Barnwell_Rhett) from South Carolina and [William Lowndes Yancey](/source/William_Lowndes_Yancey) from Alabama joined local Georgians in supporting the Southern Rights party to the "extent of ruining the state Democratic Party". Stephens, Toombs, and Cobb traversed the state in opposition with Stephens alone estimating that he traveled over 3,000 miles in the campaign.[11]

Unionists outpolled their opponents by 46,000 to 24,000 in the election to the convention, which included a 10 to 1 ratio of delegates committed against secession. Stephens and Toombs were delegates to the convention and used it to officially organize the state Constitutional Union Party. Meanwhile, in Alabama, Mississippi, and South Carolina the Georgia election results, along with the inaction of the Nashville Convention, put a damper on secessionists.[12][13]

The task of the convention became the creation of a position that both supported the Compromise of 1850 as the final solution to the sectional disputes over the expansion of slavery into new territories while maintaining a strong position for protecting the legality of slavery where it already existed. They did this by approving what came to be known as the Georgia Platform. The document in full is as follows:

Be it Resolved by the People of Georgia in Convention assembled,

1st, That we hold the American Union, secondary in importance only to the rights and principles it was designed to perpetuate. That past associations, present fruition, and future prospects, will bind us to it so long as it continues to be the safeguard of those rights and principles.

Secondly, That if the thirteen original parties to the contract, bordering the Atlantic in a narrow belt, while their separate interests were in embryo their peculiar tendencies scarcely developed, their revolutionary trials and triumphs, still green in memory, found Union impossible without Compromise, the thirty-one of this day, may well yield somewhat, in the conflict of opinion and policy, to preserve that Union which has extended the sway of republican government over a vast wilderness to another ocean, and proportionally advanced their civilization and national greatness.

Thirdly, That in this spirit, the State of Georgia has maturely considered the action of Congress embracing a series of measures for the admission of California into the Union, the organization of territorial Governments for Utah and New Mexico, the establishment of a boundary between the latter and the State of Texas, the suppression of the slave trade in the District of Columbia, and the extradition of fugitive slaves, and (connected with them) the rejection of propositions to exclude slavery from the Mexican territories and to abolish it in the District of Columbia, and whilst she does not wholly approve, will abide by it as a permanent adjustment of this sectional controversy.

Fourthly, That the State of Georgia in the judgment of this Convention, will and ought to resist even (as a last resort,) to a disruption of every tie which binds her to the Union, any action of Congress upon the subject of slavery in the District of Columbia, or in any places subject to the jurisdiction of Congress incompatible with the safety, domestic tranquility, the rights and honor of the slave-holding States, or any refusal to admit as a State any territory hereafter, applying, because of the existence of slavery therein, or any act prohibiting the introduction of slaves into the territories of New Mexico and Utah, or any act repealing or materially modifying the laws now in force for the recovery of fugitive slaves.

Fifthly, That it is the deliberate opinion of this Convention, that upon the faithful execution of the Fugitive Slave Bill by the proper authorities depends the preservation of our much loved Union.[14]

In a very neat package, the platform offered support for both union and compromise, identified specific future restrictions on slavery which would not be tolerated, and kept alive the possibility of secession as a future remedy. Many Southerners felt that the Compromise of 1850 had been shaped more towards Northern interests; the Georgia Platform made it clear that the future of the nation depended on the North strictly adhering to the Compromise.

## Repercussions

Mississippi and Alabama joined Georgia in accepting the Georgia Platform. As a political ploy, the Platform thoroughly undermined any effective response from the Southern Rights parties. Generally the Compromise was popular throughout the South, and historian [William J. Cooper Jr.](/source/William_J._Cooper_Jr.) made the point that, "Although the confrontation was not in fact a union-disunion one anywhere, the successful Unionist onslaught made it seem like one."[15] Historian David Potter stated that the Georgia Platform "became the cornerstone of southern policy for several years."[16]

The state elections of 1851 reflected the popularity of the Unionist position. In Georgia, Cobb was elected governor, Stephens was reelected to the House of Representatives, and Toombs was appointed to the United States Senate. In Mississippi, Foote defeated Jefferson Davis for the United States Senate seat. In the [elections to the House of Representatives](/source/1850_United_States_House_of_Representatives_elections), Alabama, Georgia, and Mississippi returned 14 Unionists and only 5 Southern Rights candidates. In the rest of the South, the Whigs generally gained seats in Congress.[17]

In South Carolina, there was basically only one political party, and it was divided between those advocating that South Carolina act alone and those that wanted action only in cooperation with other states. The South Carolina legislature called for both a state convention and another Southern Congress in early 1852 in Memphis. However the election turnout for the convention was very light, and the victories of Unionists elsewhere ensured that the Memphis convention never occurred.[18]

The Union Parties, despite the hopes and efforts of Stephens and others, did not become a national party. Cooper wrote:

Political parties in the South lived and prospered only through their real or supposed ability to protect the South and her institutions. A party confined to Alabama, Georgia, and Mississippi could make no believable claims for protecting anything.[19]

Ultimately the very success of the Georgia Platform meant that it soon became a basic part of Democratic Party policy. Neither the isolated Union Parties nor the remaining Whigs in other states were able to offer an effective counter to the Democrats who now appeared to offer the best protection for maintaining the legality of slavery.[20] This contributed to the dissolution of the Second Party System within the South.

## See also

- [Golden Circle](/source/Golden_Circle_(proposed_country))

- [Slave codes](/source/Slave_codes)

- [Slave Trade Acts](/source/Slave_Trade_Act)

## Notes

1. **[^](#cite_ref-1)** McCrary, Royce (Winter 1970). "The Authorship of the Georgia Platform of 1850: A Letter from Charles J. Jenkins". *Georgia Historical Quarterly*. **54** (4): 585. [JSTOR](/source/JSTOR_(identifier)) [40579248](https://www.jstor.org/stable/40579248).

1. **[^](#cite_ref-2)** Potter p. 122. Potter claimed (page 123) that as late as 1846, Southerners generally associated disunion with treason.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-3)** Potter p. 124

1. **[^](#cite_ref-4)** Cooper p. 304–305.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-5)** Huston p. 284.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-6)** Cooper p. 306.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-7)** Davis p. 57.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-8)** Holt p. 612.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-9)** Potter p. 126.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-10)** Potter p. 125–126.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-11)** Davis p. 57–60.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-12)** Potter p. 126.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-13)** Davis p. 58.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-14)** ["Georgia Platform"](https://web.archive.org/web/20070914030342/http://blueandgraytrail.com/event/Georgia_Platform). Archived from [the original](http://blueandgraytrail.com/event/Georgia_Platform) on 2007-09-14. Retrieved 2007-03-07.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-15)** Cooper p. 308–309.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-16)** Potter p. 128.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-17)** Cooper p. 310.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-18)** Craven p. 268.

1. **[^](#cite_ref-19)** Cooper p. 313

1. **[^](#cite_ref-20)** Cooper p. 317

## Bibliography

- Cooper, William J. (1978). [*The South and the Politics of Slavery 1828-1856*](https://archive.org/details/southpoliticsofs0000coop). Louisiana State University Press. [ISBN](/source/ISBN_(identifier)) [0-8071-0385-3](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/0-8071-0385-3).

- Craven, Avery (1942). *The Coming of the Civil War*. University of Chicago Press. [ISBN](/source/ISBN_(identifier)) [0-226-11894-0](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/0-226-11894-0). {{[cite book](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Cite_book)}}: ISBN / Date incompatibility ([help](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:CS1_errors#invalid_isbn_date))

- Davis, William C. (2001). [*The Union that Shaped the Confederacy: Robert Toombs & Alexander Stephens*](https://archive.org/details/unionthatshapedc0000davi). University Press of Kansas. [ISBN](/source/ISBN_(identifier)) [0-7006-1088-X](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/0-7006-1088-X).

- Holt, Michael F. (1999). *The Rise and Fall of the American Whig Party: Jacksonian Politics and the Onset of the Civil War*. Oxford university Press. [ISBN](/source/ISBN_(identifier)) [0-19-505544-6](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/0-19-505544-6).

- Huston, James L. (2000). "Southerners Against Secession: The Arguments of the Constitutional Unionists in 1850-51". *Civil War History*. **46** (4): 281–299. [doi](/source/Doi_(identifier)):[10.1353/cwh.2000.0007](https://doi.org/10.1353%2Fcwh.2000.0007). [S2CID](/source/S2CID_(identifier)) [144216596](https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:144216596).

- Potter, David M. (1976). [*The Impending Crisis 1848-1861*](https://archive.org/details/impendingcrisis00pott). Harper Collins Publishers. [ISBN](/source/ISBN_(identifier)) [0-06-131929-5](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/0-06-131929-5).

## External links

- [Georgia Platform](http://blueandgraytrail.com/event/Georgia_Platform) [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20070914030342/http://blueandgraytrail.com/event/Georgia_Platform) 2007-09-14 at the [Wayback Machine](/source/Wayback_Machine)

- [Georgia Platform, Journal of the State Convention, 1850](http://cdm.sos.state.ga.us/u?/adhoc,1103)[*[permanent dead link](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Link_rot)*] from the collection of the [Georgia Archives](http://sos.georgia.gov/archives/) [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20130628090246/http://sos.georgia.gov/archives/) 2013-06-28 at the [Wayback Machine](/source/Wayback_Machine).

v t e State of Georgia Atlanta (capital) Topics Index Climate change Geology History Congressional delegations Government Law People Mass media newspapers radio TV Music Elections Geography State parks Symbols Transportation Tourist attractions African Americans (Slavery) Society Abortion Culture Crime Demographics Economy Education Gun laws LGBTQ rights Politics Sports Regions Central Georgia Coastal Georgia East Georgia East Central Georgia Golden Isles Lower Coastal Plain Metro Atlanta North Georgia Northeast Georgia Northwest Georgia Sea Islands South Georgia Southeast Georgia Southwest Georgia West Georgia West Central Georgia Largest cities Albany Atlanta Athens Augusta Columbus Johns Creek Macon Marietta Roswell Sandy Springs Savannah South Fulton Valdosta Warner Robins Counties Appling Atkinson Bacon Baker Baldwin Banks Barrow Bartow Ben Hill Berrien Bibb Bleckley Brantley Brooks Bryan Bulloch Burke Butts Calhoun Camden Candler Carroll Catoosa Charlton Chatham Chattahoochee Chattooga Cherokee Clarke Clay Clayton Clinch Cobb Coffee Colquitt Columbia Cook Coweta Crawford Crisp Dade Dawson Decatur DeKalb Dodge Dooly Dougherty Douglas Early Echols Effingham Elbert Emanuel Evans Fannin Fayette Floyd Forsyth Franklin Fulton Gilmer Glascock Glynn Gordon Grady Greene Gwinnett Habersham Hall Hancock Haralson Harris Hart Heard Henry Houston Irwin Jackson Jasper Jeff Davis Jefferson Jenkins Johnson Jones Lamar Lanier Laurens Lee Liberty Lincoln Long Lowndes Lumpkin Macon Madison Marion McDuffie McIntosh Meriwether Miller Mitchell Monroe Montgomery Morgan Murray Muscogee Newton Oconee Oglethorpe Paulding Peach Pickens Pierce Pike Polk Pulaski Putnam Quitman Rabun Randolph Richmond Rockdale Schley Screven Seminole Spalding Stephens Stewart Sumter Talbot Taliaferro Tattnall Taylor Telfair Terrell Thomas Tift Toombs Towns Treutlen Troup Turner Twiggs Union Upson Walker Walton Ware Warren Washington Wayne Webster Wheeler White Whitfield Wilcox Wilkes Wilkinson Worth (Campbell) (Milton) Georgia (U.S. state) portal Category WikiProject

---
Adapted from the Wikipedia article [Georgia Platform](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_Platform) by Wikipedia contributors ([contributor history](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_Platform?action=history)). Available under [Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Changes may have been made.