# Constitutional theory

> Mediated Wiki article. Canonical URL: https://mediated.wiki/source/Constitutional_theory
> Markdown URL: https://mediated.wiki/source/Constitutional_theory.md
> Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitutional_theory
> Source revision: 1306623874
> License: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/)

Area of constitutional law

Not to be confused with [Constitution theory](/source/Constitution_theory).

This article needs more citations. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Constitutional theory" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (May 2025) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

**Constitutional theory** is an area of [constitutional law](/source/Constitutional_law) that focuses on the underpinnings of constitutional government. It overlaps with [legal theory](/source/Legal_theory), [constitutionalism](/source/Constitutionalism), [philosophy of law](/source/Philosophy_of_law) and democratic theory. It is not limited by country or jurisdiction.

## German Rechtsstaat

The Rechtsstaat doctrine (Legal state, State of Right, Constitutional state, constitutional government) was introduced in the latest works of the German philosopher [Immanuel Kant](/source/Immanuel_Kant) (1724–1804) after US and French constitutions were adopted in the late 18th century. Kant's approach is based on the supremacy of a country's written [constitution](/source/Constitution). This supremacy must create guarantees for implementation of his central idea: a permanent peaceful life as a basic condition for the happiness of its people and their prosperity. Kant was basing his doctrine on none other but [constitutionalism](/source/Constitutionalism) and [constitutional government](/source/Constitutional_government).

Kant had thus formulated the main problem of constitutionalism, “The constitution of a [state](/source/State_(polity)) is eventually based on the morals of its citizens, which, in its turns, is based on the goodness of this constitution.” [*[citation needed](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Citation_needed)*] Kant's idea is the foundation for the constitutional theory of the twenty-first century. The Legal state concept is based on the ideas, discovered by Immanuel Kant, for example, in his Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals: “The task of establishing a universal and permanent peaceful life is not only a part of theory of law within the framework of pure reason, but per se an absolute and ultimate goal. To achieve this goal, a state must become the community of a large number of people, living provided with legislative guarantees of their property rights secured by a common constitution. The supremacy of this constitution… must be derived a priori from the considerations for achievement of the absolute ideal in the most just and fair organization of people’s life under the aegis of public law.”.[1]

## Russian legal state

The Russian legal system, borne out of transformations in the 19th century under the [judicial reform of Alexander II](/source/Judicial_reform_of_Alexander_II), is based primarily upon the German legal tradition. It was from here that Russia borrowed a doctrine of Rechtsstaat, which literally translates as Legal State. The English most close analogue is «rule of law».[2] Rechtsstaat is a concept in continental European legal thinking, originally borrowed from German legal philosophy, which can be translated as “legal state” or "state of law", or "state of rights", "constitutional state" in which the exercise of governmental power is constrained by the law. The Russian Legal state concept adopts the written constitution as a supreme law of the country (the rule of constitution).[3] The concept of “legal state” (“pravovoe gosudarstvo” in Russian) is a fundamental, but undefined, principle that appears in the very first dispositive provision of Russia's [post-Communist constitution](/source/Constitution_of_Russia): “The Russian Federation – Russia – constitutes a democratic federative legal state with a republican form of governance.” Similarly, the very first dispositive provision of the [Constitution of Ukraine](/source/Constitution_of_Ukraine) declares: “Ukraine is a sovereign and independent, democratic, social, legal state.” The effort to give meaning to definition “Legal State” is anything but theoretical.

[Valery Zorkin](/source/Valery_Zorkin), President of the [Constitutional Court of Russia](/source/Constitutional_Court_of_Russia), wrote in 2003: “Becoming a legal state has long been our ultimate goal, and we have certainly made serious progress in this direction over the past several years. However, no one can say now that we have reached this destination. Such a Legal state simply cannot exist without a lawful and just society. Here, as in no other sphere of our life, the state reflects the level of maturity reached by society.".[4]

The Russian concept of legal state adopted many segments of the [constitutional economics](/source/Constitutional_economics). One of the founders of constitutional economics [James M. Buchanan](/source/James_M._Buchanan), the 1986 recipient of the [Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences](/source/Nobel_Memorial_Prize_in_Economic_Sciences) argues that in the framework of constitutional government any governmental interventions and regulations have been based on three assumptions.

- First, every failure of the [market economy](/source/Market_economy) to function smoothly and perfectly can be corrected by governmental intervention.

- Second, those holding political office and manning the bureaucracies are altruistic upholders of the public interest, unconcerned with their own personal economic well-being.

- And, third, changing the responsibilities of [government](/source/Government) towards more intervention and control will not profoundly and perversely affect the social and economic life.

## United States

Constitutional theory in the [United States](/source/United_States) is an academic discipline that focuses on the meaning of the United States [Constitution](/source/Constitution). Its concerns include (but are not limited to) the historical, linguistic, sociological, ethical, and political aspects.

Much of constitutional theory is concerned with theories of [judicial review](/source/Judicial_review). This is in part because *[Marbury v. Madison](/source/Marbury_v._Madison)*, which established this judicial power in the early 19th century, has given the judiciary near-final authority on constitutional meaning.

Aside from judicial review, constitutional theory in general seeks to ask and answer the following questions:

- How should the Constitution be interpreted?

- How much weight should be given to the history of the Constitution's framing?

- How much, if any, of the Constitution's meaning can be read as implicit in the text?

- What vision of republican[5] government does the Constitution seek to further?

- How does constitutional meaning shift with other changes in the political structure?

- How does constitutional meaning shift with changes in cultural norms?

- What is the proper relationship between individual rights and state power?

- What is the proper relationship between the branches of government - This question involves the power of judicial review, noted above

- What is the proper relationship between the federal government and the states?

Although constitutional theory as a discipline has its precursors in *[The Federalist](/source/The_Federalist)* and [Justice Story](/source/Justice_Story)'s *[Commentaries on the Constitution](https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commentaries_on_the_Constitution&action=edit&redlink=1)*, modern constitutional theory began with the publication of [Alexander Bickel](/source/Alexander_Bickel)'s *[The Least Dangerous Branch](/source/The_Least_Dangerous_Branch)*. (The title is an allusion to *The Federalist* No. 78, in which [Alexander Hamilton](/source/Alexander_Hamilton) wrote that the judiciary "will always be the least dangerous to the political rights of the Constitution", because it has neither the sword (like the Executive) nor the purse (like the Legislature). The book's primary (but not sole) contribution was to introduce the idea of the "[countermajoritarian difficulty](/source/Countermajoritarian_difficulty)." The idea expressed by the term countermajoritarian difficulty is that there is a tension between democratic government (as he defines it democratic government is majoritarian government) and judicial power. If the judiciary—an unelected branch of government—can overturn popular legislation, then either there is a fundamental contradiction within the democratic system, or there is a tension that must be resolved by curbing judicial power. (One of Bickel's solutions is for the Court to exercise "the [passive virtues](https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Passive_virtues&action=edit&redlink=1)": that is, to decline to decide more than it has to decide.)

## Important theorists

This section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Constitutional theory" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (May 2025) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

The following is a partial list of important American theorists and thinkers:

- [Bruce Ackerman](/source/Bruce_Ackerman), Professor of Law, [Yale University](/source/Yale_University). Primary contributions: *We the People: Foundations* and *We the People: Transformations*.

- [Jack Balkin](/source/Jack_Balkin), Professor of Law, [Yale University](/source/Yale_University)

- [Charles A. Beard](/source/Charles_A._Beard), Professor of Sociology, [New School for Social Research](/source/New_School_for_Social_Research), Primary contributions: [An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution](/source/An_Economic_Interpretation_of_the_Constitution)

- [Randy Barnett](/source/Randy_Barnett), Professor of Law, [Georgetown University](/source/Georgetown_University)

- [Alexander Bickel](/source/Alexander_Bickel), former [Yale](/source/Yale) professor who published *The Least Dangerous Branch*, *The Morality of Consent*, *The Supreme Court and the Idea of Progress*, among other works.

- [Erwin Chemerinsky](/source/Erwin_Chemerinsky), Dean, [University of California, Irvine School of Law](/source/University_of_California%2C_Irvine_School_of_Law)

- [Ronald Dworkin](/source/Ronald_Dworkin), Professor of Law, [New York University School of Law](/source/New_York_University_School_of_Law)

- [Christopher Eisgruber](/source/Christopher_Eisgruber), President, [Princeton University](/source/Princeton_University)

- [John Hart Ely](/source/John_Hart_Ely), Scholar and former professor at several leading law schools.

- [James E. Fleming](/source/James_E._Fleming), Professor of Law, Boston University.

- [Alex Kozinski](/source/Alex_Kozinski), Judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitState (polity)

- [Sanford Levinson](/source/Sanford_Levinson), Professor of Law and Government, [University of Texas at Austin](/source/University_of_Texas_at_Austin)

- [Walter F. Murphy](/source/Walter_F._Murphy) McCormick Professor of Jurisprudence, [Princeton University](/source/Princeton_University)

- [Richard Posner](/source/Richard_Posner), Senior Judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

- [Robert Post](/source/Robert_Post_(law_professor)), professor of law at Yale Law School

- [Richard Primus](/source/Richard_Primus), Professor of Law [University of Michigan Law School](/source/University_of_Michigan_Law_School)

- [Lawrence G. Sager](/source/Lawrence_G._Sager), Professor of Law [University of Texas at Austin](/source/University_of_Texas_at_Austin)

- [Antonin Scalia](/source/Antonin_Scalia), Associate Justice of the Supreme Court. His ideas on [originalism](/source/Originalism) published in *A Matter of Interpretation*.

- [Suzanna Sherry](/source/Suzanna_Sherry), Professor of Law, [Vanderbilt University Law School](/source/Vanderbilt_University_Law_School). Primary contributions: *Desperately Seeking Certainty: The Misguided Quest for Constitutional Foundations* and *Beyond All Reason: The Radical Assault on Truth in American Law* (both with Daniel Farber of [Boalt Hall](/source/University_of_California%2C_Berkeley_School_of_Law)).

- [Lawrence Solum](/source/Lawrence_Solum). Professor of Law, [University of Virginia School of Law](/source/University_of_Virginia_School_of_Law)

- [Cass Sunstein](/source/Cass_Sunstein), Professor of Law, [Harvard University](/source/Harvard_University)

- [William Howard Taft](/source/William_Howard_Taft) (b. 1858 - d. 1930), 10th [Chief Justice of the United States](/source/Chief_Justice_of_the_United_States) (1921–1930); 27th [President of the United States](/source/President_of_the_United_States) (1909–1913); Kent Professor of Constitutional Law and Legal History, [Yale Law School](/source/Yale_Law_School), [Yale University](/source/Yale_University) (1913–1921); Dean and Professor of Law, [University of Cincinnati](/source/University_of_Cincinnati) Law School; [Solicitor General of the United States](/source/Solicitor_General_of_the_United_States)

- [Laurence Tribe](/source/Laurence_Tribe), Professor of Law, [Harvard University Law School](/source/Harvard_University_Law_School)

- [Jeffrey K. Tulis](/source/Jeffrey_K._Tulis). Professor of Government and Law, [University of Texas at Austin](/source/University_of_Texas_at_Austin)

- [William Van Alstyne](/source/William_Van_Alstyne), Professor of Law, [College of William & Mary](/source/College_of_William_%26_Mary)

## See also

- [Constitutionalism](/source/Constitutionalism)

- [Constitutional law](/source/Constitutional_law)

- [Constitutional economics](/source/Constitutional_economics)

- [Legal reform](/source/Legal_reform)

- [Rule of law](/source/Rule_of_law)

- [Rule According to Higher Law](/source/Rule_According_to_Higher_Law)

- [Philosophy of law](/source/Philosophy_of_law)

## Notes

1. **[^](#cite_ref-1)** "Immanuel Kant", *History of [Political Philosophy](/source/Political_Philosophy)*, edited by Leo Strauss and Joseph Cropsey, University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London, 1987

1. **[^](#cite_ref-2)** Peter Barenboim, Defining the rules, The European Lawyer, Issue 90, October 2009

1. **[^](#cite_ref-3)** The former President of the [International Bar Association](/source/International_Bar_Association) Francis Neate wrote about links between Russian concept of the Legal state and British approach: “The [Rule of Law](/source/Rule_of_Law) is an English concept. I am told that the equivalent in Russia, and possibly in other countries, is better translated as ‘Legal State’, or ‘a state governed by law’. If the latter phrase is acceptable then surely we are talking about the same thing... The best way to determine whether or not we are talking about the same concept is to look at the essential characteristics of the Rule of Law and to determine whether or not they are similar to the essential characteristics of the ‘Legal State’. This is what I propose to do.”, "The Rule of Law: Perspectives from Around the Globe", Editor: Francis Neate, London, 2009

1. **[^](#cite_ref-4)** "[The World Rule of Law Movement and Russian Legal Reform](http://philosophicalclub.ru/content/docs/worldruleoflaw.pdf)", edited by Francis Neate and Holly Nielsen, Justitsinform, Moscow (2007).

1. **[^](#cite_ref-5)** ["Constitution for the United States of America"](http://www.constitution.org/cons/constitu.htm#con4.4).

## References

- Waluchow, Wil. ["Constitutionalism"](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/constitutionalism/). In [Zalta, Edward N.](/source/Edward_N._Zalta) (ed.). *[Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy](/source/Stanford_Encyclopedia_of_Philosophy)*. [ISSN](/source/ISSN_(identifier)) [1095-5054](https://search.worldcat.org/issn/1095-5054). [OCLC](/source/OCLC_(identifier)) [429049174](https://search.worldcat.org/oclc/429049174).

- James A. Dorn, 2004. "Creating a Constitutional Order of Freedom in Emerging Market Economies," *Economic Affairs*, 24(3), pp. 58–63. [Abstract.](http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1468-0270.2004.t01-1-00493.x/abstract)

- James M. Buchanan (1975). [*The Limits of Liberty: Between Anarchy and Leviathan*](https://books.google.com/books?id=J2941eaDjRwC). University of Chicago Press. [ISBN](/source/ISBN_(identifier)) [978-0-226-07820-5](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/978-0-226-07820-5).

- Buchanan, James M., 1986. ["The Constitution of Economic Policy,"](http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economics/laureates/1986/buchanan-lecture.html) Nobel Prize lecture, reprinted in *American Economic Review*, 77(3), p [p. 243](https://www.jstor.org/pss/1804093)-250.

- Buchanan, James M., 1990a. "The Domain of Constitutional Economics," *Constitutional Political Economy*, 1(1), pp. [1](https://doi.org/10.1007%2FBF02393031)-18. Also at Buchanan, 1990b.

- _____, 1990b. *The Economics and the Ethics of Constitutional Order*, University of Michigan Press. [Description](https://archive.org/details/economicsethicso1991buch) & chapter [links.](https://archive.org/details/economicsethicso1991buch)

v t e Law Core subjects Administrative law Civil law Constitutional law Contract Criminal law Crime Deed Doctrine Equity Evidence International law Law of obligations Private law Procedure Civil Criminal Property law Public law Punishment Capital Corporal Restitution and unjust enrichment Statutory law Tort Disciplines Abortion law Agricultural law Animal law Aviation law Amnesty law Banking law Bankruptcy Commercial law Competition law Conflict of laws Construction law Consumer protection Corporate law Cyberlaw Drugs law Election law Energy law Entertainment law Environmental law Family law Financial law Financial regulation Health law public health global health Immigration law Intellectual property International criminal law International labour law International human rights International slavery laws International trade law Jurimetrics Labour Landlord–tenant law Law of war Legal archaeology Legal fiction Maritime law Marriage law Military law Music law Nationality law Probate Estate Will and testament Product liability Public international law Refugee law Space law Sports law State of emergency Tax law Transport law Trust law Unenforced law Sources of law Charter Legal code / Statutory law Constitution Custom Divine law Divine right Human rights Legitimacy Letters patent Man-made law Natural law Natural and legal rights Case law Precedent Law reports Legal treatise Regulations Law making Ballot measure Codification Decree Edict Executive order Proclamation Legislation Delegated legislation Regulation Reform Rulemaking Promulgation Ratification Repeal Treaty Concordat Statutory law Statute Act of parliament Act of Congress Basic structure doctrine Legal systems Civil law Common law Chinese law Legal pluralism Religious law Canon law Catholic canon law Hindu law Jain law Jewish law Parsi law Sharia Roman law Byzantine law Socialist law Statutory law Xeer Yassa Legal theory Anarchist Contract theory Comparative law Expressive function Feminist Law and economics Legal ethics Legal formalism History Libertarian International legal theory Principle of legality Principle of typicality Pseudolaw Rule of law Rule of man Sociology Jurisprudence Adjudication Administration of justice Admission to practice law Constitutionalism Criminal justice Court-martial Disbarment Dispute resolution Fiqh Lawsuit/Litigation Legal opinion Legal remedy Damages Deterrence (penology) Proportionality Reparations Legal status Judge Justice of the peace Magistrate Judgment Judicial activism Judicial interpretation Judicial misconduct Kangaroo court Judicial review Jurisdiction Jury Justice Practice of law Attorney Barrister Counsel Lawyer Legal representation Prosecutor Solicitor Question of fact Question of law Trial Trial advocacy Trier of fact Ultra vires Verdict Legal institutions Barristers' chambers Bureaucracy The bar The bench Civil society Court Ecclesiastical Court of equity Election commission Executive Judiciary Law enforcement Agency Legal education Law school Legal industry by country Legislature Military Police Political party Tribunal History History of the legal profession History of the American legal profession Women in law Law portal Category Index Outline

v t e Constitution of the United States Articles Preamble I II III IV V VI VII Amendments Bill of Rights 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1795–1804 11 12 Reconstruction 13 14 15 20th century 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Unratified Congressional Apportionment Titles of Nobility Corwin Amendment Child Labor Equal Rights District of Columbia Voting Rights Proposed Balanced budget Blaine amendment Bricker amendment Campaign finance reform Christian amendment Crittenden Compromise Electoral College abolition Equal Opportunity to Govern Federal Marriage Flag Desecration Human Life "Liberty" amendment Ludlow amendment Parental Rights amendment School Prayer Single subject Victims' Rights Convention to propose amendments State ratifying conventions Formation History Articles of Confederation Mount Vernon Conference Annapolis Convention Philadelphia Convention Virginia Plan New Jersey Plan Connecticut Compromise Three-fifths Compromise Committee of Detail List of Framers Signing Printing Independence Hall Syng inkstand The Federalist Papers Anti-Federalist Papers Massachusetts Compromise Virginia Ratifying Convention New York Circular Letter Hillsborough Convention Fayetteville Convention Ratification Rhode Island Massachusetts Drafting and ratification timeline Clauses Admission to the Union Appointments Appropriations Assemble and Petition Clause Assistance of Counsel Case or Controversy Citizenship Commerce Compact Compulsory Process Confrontation Congressional enforcement Contingent Elections Contract Copyright and Patent Double Jeopardy Due Process Elections Engagements Equal Protection Establishment Exceptions Excessive Bail Ex Post Facto Extradition Free Exercise Freedom of the Press Freedom of Speech Fugitive Slave Full Faith and Credit General Welfare Guarantee House Apportionment Impeachment Import-Export Ineligibility Militia Natural-born citizen Necessary and Proper No Religious Test Oath or Affirmation Original Jurisdiction Origination Pardon Postal Presentment Presidential Electors Presidential succession Privileges and Immunities Privileges or Immunities Recess appointment Recommendation Self-Incrimination Speech or Debate Speedy Trial State of the Union Supremacy Suspension Take Care Takings Taxing and Spending Territorial Title of Nobility (Foreign Emoluments) Treaty Trial by Jury Vesting (Legislative / Executive / Judicial) Vicinage War Powers Interpretation Balance of powers Concurrent powers Constitutional law Criminal procedure Criminal sentencing Declaration of war Dormant Commerce Clause Enumerated powers Equal footing Exclusive federal powers Executive privilege Fundamental rights Government interest Narrow tailoring Strict scrutiny Intermediate scrutiny Rational basis review Unenumerated rights Facial challenge Regulatory takings State action Vagueness doctrine Implied powers Incorporation of the Bill of Rights Judicial review Nondelegation doctrine Plenary power Preemption Reserved powers Saxbe fix Separation of church and state Separation of powers Symmetric federalism Taxation power Signatories Convention President George Washington New Hampshire John Langdon Nicholas Gilman Massachusetts Nathaniel Gorham Rufus King Connecticut William Samuel Johnson Roger Sherman New York Alexander Hamilton New Jersey William Livingston David Brearley William Paterson Jonathan Dayton Pennsylvania Benjamin Franklin Thomas Mifflin Robert Morris George Clymer Thomas Fitzsimons Jared Ingersoll James Wilson Gouverneur Morris Delaware George Read Gunning Bedford Jr. John Dickinson Richard Bassett Jacob Broom Maryland James McHenry Daniel of St. Thomas Jenifer Daniel Carroll Virginia John Blair James Madison North Carolina William Blount Richard Dobbs Spaight Hugh Williamson South Carolina John Rutledge Charles Cotesworth Pinckney Charles Pinckney Pierce Butler Georgia William Few Abraham Baldwin Convention Secretary William Jackson Related Notes of Debates in the Federal Convention of 1787 Jacob Shallus William Lambert Bibliography of the United States Constitution Founding Fathers of the United States Display and legacy National Archives Rotunda for the Charters of Freedom Independence Mall Constitution Day and Citizenship Day Constitution Gardens Constitution Week National Constitution Center Scene at the Signing of the Constitution (painting) A More Perfect Union (film) Worldwide influence

Authority control databases GND

---
Adapted from the Wikipedia article [Constitutional theory](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitutional_theory) by Wikipedia contributors ([contributor history](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitutional_theory?action=history)). Available under [Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Changes may have been made.