# Civil union > Mediated Wiki article. Canonical URL: https://mediated.wiki/source/Civil_union > Markdown URL: https://mediated.wiki/source/Civil_union.md > Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_union > Source revision: 1356751619 > License: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/) Legal union similar to marriage Not to be confused with [Domestic partnership](/source/Domestic_partnership). Part of the LGBTQ rights series Legal status of same-sex unions Marriage Andorra Argentina Australia Austria Belgium Brazil Canada Chile Colombia Costa Rica Cuba Denmark Ecuador Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Iceland Ireland Liechtenstein Luxembourg Malta Mexico Netherlands[i] New Zealand[ii] Norway Portugal Slovenia South Africa Spain Sweden Switzerland Taiwan Thailand United Kingdom[iii] United States[iv] Uruguay Recognized Israel[v] United States:[iv] • American Samoa Civil unions or registered partnerships but not marriage Bolivia Croatia Cyprus Czech Republic Hungary Italy Latvia Lithuania Monaco Montenegro San Marino United Kingdom: • Bermuda • Cayman Islands Minimal recognition Cambodia[vi] China[vii] • Hong Kong[viii] India[ix] Japan[x] Namibia[xi] Netherlands:[i] • Sint Maarten Philippines[xii] Poland[xiii] Romania[xiv] See also Same-sex union legislation Same-sex union court cases Timeline of same-sex marriage Recognition of same-sex unions in Africa Recognition of same-sex unions in Asia Recognition of same-sex unions in Europe Recognition of same-sex unions in the Americas Recognition of same-sex unions in Oceania Marriage privatization Divorce of same-sex couples Domestic partnership Military policy Adoption Listings by country LGBTQ rights by country or territory Notes ^ a b Performed in the Netherlands proper (including the Caribbean Netherlands), as well as in Aruba and Curaçao. May be registered in Sint Maarten in such cases, but the rights of marriage are not guaranteed. ^ Neither performed nor recognized in Tokelau or the associated states of the Cook Islands and Niue. ^ Same-sex marriage is also legal in the Crown Dependencies of Guernsey, the Isle of Man and Jersey, and the British Overseas Territories of Akrotiri and Dhekelia, the British Antarctic Territory, the British Indian Ocean Territory, the Falkland Islands, Gibraltar, the Pitcairn Islands, Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha, and South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands. Same-sex marriage is not performed in six British Overseas Territories: Anguilla, Bermuda, the British Virgin Islands, the Cayman Islands, Montserrat, and the Turks and Caicos Islands. ^ a b Neither performed nor recognized in some tribal nations of the US. Recognized but not performed in several other tribal nations and American Samoa. ^ Registered foreign marriages confer all marriage rights in Israel. Domestic common-law marriages confer most rights of marriage. Domestic civil marriage recognized by some cities. ^ A "declaration of family relationship" is available in several of Cambodia's communes which may be useful in matters such as housing, but is not legally binding. ^ Guardianship agreements confer some limited legal benefits in China, including decisions about medical and personal care. ^ Hong Kong provides inheritance, guardianship rights, and residency rights for foreign spouses of legal residents. ^ Indian courts have recognized guru–shishya, nata pratha or maitri karar–type contractual relationships, but they are not legally binding. ^ In addition to non-binding local partnership certificates, Japanese common-law marriage rights are applied nationwide. ^ Marriages conducted abroad between a Namibian national and a foreign spouse provide residency rights in Namibia. ^ Several Philippine cities issue or are considering "Right To Care" cards that allow same-sex partners to make medical decisions in case of emergency. ^ Poland recognized same-sex marriages conducted abroad after losing Cupriak-Trojan and Trojan. ^ Romania provides hospital visitation rights through a "legal representative" status. LGBTQ portal v t e This article is part of a series on Family law Marriage and other unions and status Types of marriages Cohabitation Concubinage Common-law marriage Civil union Domestic partnership Validity of marriages Marriage licence Marriage certificate Marriageable age Void and Voidable marriages Annulment Sham marriage Dissolution of marriages Divorce Grounds for divorce No-fault divorce Adultery Legal separation Property, finance & maintenance Prenuptial agreement Matrimonial regime Alimony Child support Paternity fraud Filial responsibility laws Children's issues Child custody Parenting plan Contact & visitation Grandparent visitation Legal guardian Adoption Foster care Ward Paternity DNA paternity testing Legitimacy Tender years doctrine Emancipation Paper abortion CAFCASS [UK] Custody evaluator (US) Parenting coordinator (US) Private international law Conflict of laws Conflict of divorce Conflict of marriage Hague Convention (child abduction) Hague Convention (adoption) Hague Convention (maintenance) Family and criminal code (or criminal law) Domestic violence Child abuse CPS (US) Child selling Bigamy Incest Legality of incest Parental child abduction Parental duties Parents' rights Paternal rights and abortion UN Rights of the Child Children's rights Right to family life v t e Part of a series on LGBTQ people LGBTQ Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender Queer Sexual orientation and gender Agender Aromantic Asexual Gray asexual Aegosexual Demisexual Biology Bisexual Polysexual Pansexual Demographics Environment Fictosexual Gender expression Gender fluid Gender identity Gender role Gender nonconforming Homosexual Intersex Non-heterosexual Non-binary Queer Questioning Sexual identity Romantic orientation Sex–gender distinction Transgender Trans man Trans woman Transsexual Two-spirit WSW History General Timeline Same-sex marriage Intersex Movements Gay liberation Same-sex unions Stonewall riots Identities Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender Culture Business Coming out Community African-American Disability and LGBTQ people Drag culture in New York City Dyke March Events Awareness periods Largest events Gay village Homophile movement Media Bury your gays Films New queer cinema Periodicals LGBTQ culture in New York City Pride Pride Month Parade Queer art QPR and QPP Same-sex relationship Cross-sex relationship Slang Polari Socialization Subcultures Symbols Flags Takatāpui Transgender culture of New York City Moe aikāne Tourism Rights Adoption Civil union Decriminalization Gender self-identification Intersex Legal recognition of intersex people Legal recognition of non-binary gender Marriage Military service Parenting Rights by country or territory Trans rights Yogyakarta Principles Health Association of LGBTQ Psychiatrists MSM and Blood donation restrictions / HIV LGBTQ medical organizations Reproduction Mental health National LGBT Cancer Network Transgender health care Gender-affirming hormone therapy Gender-affirming surgery Gender transition Legal status of gender-affirming healthcare Misinformation Suicide Societal attitudes Allonormative amatonormative Cisnormative Heteronormative Comphet Opposition to LGBTQ rights UK anti-trans movement 2020s US anti-LGBTQ Trump-era persecution of trans people Grooming conspiracy theory Media portrayal Religion & LGBTQ Homosexuality Trans people Sexual diversity Stereotypes Issues Acephobia Arophobia AIDS stigma Anti-LGBTQ rhetoric Biphobia Bullying Censorship Closeted Outing Criminalization Domestic violence Erasure Straightwashing Bisexual Lesbian Trans Gay bashing Gayphobia Heteropatriarchy Heterosexism Homophobia Liberal Intersex discrimination Legality of conversion therapy Lesbophobia Suicide Youth vulnerability Migration Mixed-orientation marriage Racism Sexualism Transphobia Non-binary people Transgender inequality Trans men Trans women Violence in Belize in UK in US List Trans people Academic fields and discourse Communism & LGBTQ rights Gender studies Lesbian feminism Lavender linguistics LGBTQ conservatism In the US Neuroqueer theory Queer anarchism Queer studies Queer theory Social construction of gender Socialism & LGBTQ rights Transfeminism Transgender studies Travesti See also Autism and LGBTQ people Discrimination against LGBTQ people Gay-friendly GLAAD LGBTQ-affirming religious groups LGBTQ ageing LGBTQ retirement issues in the United States LGBTQ sex education Straight ally LGBTQ portal v t e A **civil union**, also known by a variety of other termina, is a legal recognition of a relationship. Civil unions grant some or all of the rights of marriage, with [child adoption](/source/Child_adoption) being a common exception. Many jurisdictions with civil unions recognize foreign unions if those are essentially equivalent to their own; for example, the [United Kingdom](/source/United_Kingdom) lists equivalent unions in the [Civil Partnership Act 2004 Schedule 20](/source/Civil_Partnership_Act_2004#Schedule_20). The marriages of same-sex couples performed abroad may be recognized as civil unions in jurisdictions that only have the latter. Civil unions have been established by law in several mostly [developed countries](/source/Developed_countries) in order to provide legal recognition of relationships formed by same-sex couples and to afford them rights, benefits, tax breaks, and responsibilities. In 1989, [Denmark](/source/Same-sex_marriage_in_Denmark) was the first country to legalise civil unions; however, most other developed democracies did not begin establishing them until the 1990s and early 2000s. In [Brazil](/source/Same-sex_marriage_in_Brazil), civil unions were first created for opposite-sex couples in 2002, and then expanded to include same-sex couples in 2011. In the majority of countries that established same-sex civil unions, they have since been either supplemented or replaced by [same-sex marriage](/source/Same-sex_marriage). Civil unions are viewed by [LGBT rights](/source/LGBT_rights) campaigners as a "first step" towards establishing same-sex marriage, as civil unions are viewed by supporters of LGBT rights as a "[separate but equal](/source/Separate_but_equal)" status. ## Overview and terminology The notion of civil unions is rejected by some, such as this protester at a large demonstration in New York City against [California Proposition 8](/source/California_Proposition_8_(2008)).[1] The terms used to designate civil unions are not standardised and vary widely from country to country. Government-sanctioned relationships that may be similar or equivalent to civil unions include [civil partnerships](/source/Civil_partnership_in_the_United_Kingdom), [registered partnerships](/source/Registered_partnership_in_the_Czech_Republic), [domestic partnerships](/source/Domestic_partnership), [significant relationships](/source/Domestic_partnership_in_Tasmania), [reciprocal beneficiary relationships](/source/Reciprocal_beneficiary_relationships_in_Hawaii), [common-law marriage](/source/Common-law_marriage), [adult interdependent relationships](/source/Adult_interdependent_relationship_in_Alberta), [life partnerships](/source/Recognition_of_same-sex_unions_in_Germany), [stable unions](/source/Recognition_of_same-sex_unions_in_Andorra), [civil solidarity pacts](/source/Civil_solidarity_pact), and so on. The exact level of rights, benefits, obligations, and responsibilities also varies, depending on the laws of a particular country. Some jurisdictions allow same-sex couples to adopt, while others forbid them to do so, or allow adoption only in specified circumstances. In the [United States](/source/United_States), the term *civil union* was introduced in the state of [Vermont](/source/Same-sex_marriage_in_Vermont) in 2000 to connote a status equivalent to marriage for same-sex couples; it was chosen by the state's legislators in preference to phrases such as "domestic partner relationship" or "civil accord".[2] *[Domestic partnership](/source/Domestic_partnership)*, offered by some states, counties, cities, and employers since as early as 1985,[3] has generally connoted a lesser status with fewer benefits.[4] However, the legislatures of the [West Coast](/source/West_Coast_of_the_United_States) states of [California](/source/Domestic_partnership_in_California), [Oregon](/source/Domestic_partnership_in_Oregon) and [Washington](/source/Domestic_partnership_in_Washington_(state)) have preferred the term *domestic partnership* for enactments similar or equivalent to civil union laws in [East Coast](/source/East_Coast_of_the_United_States) states. Civil unions are not seen as a replacement for marriage by many in the LGBT community. "[Marriage](/source/Marriage) in the United States is a civil union; a civil union, as it has come to be called, is not marriage", said [Evan Wolfson](/source/Evan_Wolfson) of [Freedom to Marry](/source/Freedom_to_Marry).[5] "It is a proposed hypothetical legal mechanism, since it doesn't exist in most places, to give some of the protections but also withhold something precious from gay people. There's no good reason to do that." However, some opponents of same-sex marriage claim that civil unions rob marriage of its unique status; Randy Thomasson, executive director of the [Campaign for California Families](/source/Campaign_for_California_Families), calls civil unions "homosexual marriage by another name" and contends that civil unions provide same-sex couples "all the rights of marriage available under state law".[6] The California Supreme Court, in the *[In Re Marriage Cases](/source/In_Re_Marriage_Cases)* decision, noted nine differences[7] in state law. Civil unions are commonly criticised as being '[separate but equal](/source/Separate_but_equal)'; critics such as former [New Zealand](/source/New_Zealand) MP and feminist [Marilyn Waring](/source/Marilyn_Waring) note that same-sex couples remain excluded from the right to marry and are forced to use a separate institution.[8] Supporters of same-sex marriage contend that treating same-sex couples differently from other couples under the law allows for inferior treatment and that if civil unions were the same as marriage there would be no reason for two separate laws. A New Jersey commission which reviewed the state's civil union law reported that the law "invites and encourages unequal treatment of same-sex couples and their children".[9] Some have suggested that creating civil unions which are open to opposite-sex couples would avoid the accusations of apartheid.[10] Proponents of civil unions say that they provide practical equality for same-sex couples and solve the problems over areas such as hospital visitation rights and transfer of property caused by lack of legal recognition.[11] Proponents also say that creating civil unions is a more pragmatic way to ensure that same-sex couples have legal rights as it avoids the more controversial issues surrounding marriage and the claim that the term has a religious source. Many supporters of same-sex marriage state that the word "marriage" matters and that the term "civil union" and its equivalents do not convey the emotional meaning or bring the respect that comes with marriage.[9][12] Former US Solicitor General and attorney in the *[Perry v. Schwarzenegger](/source/Perry_v._Schwarzenegger)* case [Theodore Olsen](/source/Theodore_Olsen) said that recognizing same-sex couples under the term "domestic partnership" stigmatizes gay people's relationships, treating them as if they were "something akin to a commercial venture, not a loving union".[13] Many also contend that the fact that civil unions are often not understood can cause difficulty for same-sex couples in emergency situations.[14] ## List of jurisdictions recognizing same-sex unions but not same-sex marriage As of June 12, 2025, the states that provide civil unions but not marriage for same-sex couples are: - [Bolivia](/source/Recognition_of_same-sex_unions_in_Bolivia) - [Croatia](/source/Recognition_of_same-sex_unions_in_Croatia) - [Cyprus](/source/Recognition_of_same-sex_unions_in_Cyprus) - [Czech Republic](/source/Recognition_of_same-sex_unions_in_the_Czech_Republic) - [Hungary](/source/Recognition_of_same-sex_unions_in_Hungary) - [Italy](/source/Recognition_of_same-sex_unions_in_Italy) - [Latvia](/source/Recognition_of_same-sex_unions_in_Latvia) - [Lithuania](/source/Recognition_of_same-sex_unions_in_Lithuania) - [Monaco](/source/Recognition_of_same-sex_unions_in_Monaco) - [Montenegro](/source/Recognition_of_same-sex_unions_in_Montenegro) - [San Marino](/source/Recognition_of_same-sex_unions_in_San_Marino) - the British territories of [Bermuda](/source/Same-sex_marriage_in_Bermuda) and [Cayman Islands](/source/Same-sex_marriage_in_the_Cayman_Islands) In [Israel](/source/Israel), no national domestic authority performs same-sex marriage, though couples may marry abroad. In addition, same-sex couples may be considered to have a [common-law marriage](/source/Common-law_marriage), which affords "most" of the rights of marriage.[15] ## List of jurisdictions recognizing same-sex unions Main article: [Same-sex union legislation](/source/Same-sex_union_legislation)   Civil unions for same-sex couples   Civil unions in some counties   Civil unions not performed The following is a list of countries and other jurisdictions which have established civil unions for same-sex couples or opposite-sex couples, categorized by continent, with the year in which the law establishing civil unions in the listed country or other jurisdiction came into effect in brackets: ### Africa - [South Africa](/source/South_Africa) (2006; *civil partnership*; [Afrikaans](/source/Afrikaans_language): *burgerlike verbintenis*)[16] ### Americas - [Costa Rica](/source/Costa_Rica) (1995; Spanish: *unión de hecho*)[17] - [United States](/source/United_States): - [Hawaii](/source/Hawaii) (*reciprocal beneficiary relationship* since 1997, *civil union* since 2012) - [New York City](/source/New_York_City) (1998, *domestic partnership*)[18] - [California](/source/California) (1999; *domestic partnership*)[19] - [District of Columbia](/source/Washington%2C_D.C.) (2002, *domestic partnership*)[20] - [Maine](/source/Maine) (2004; *domestic partnership*)[21] - [New Jersey](/source/New_Jersey) (*domestic partnership* since 2004, *civil union* since 2006)[22] - [Washington](/source/Washington_(state)) (2007; *domestic partnership*)[23] - [Maryland](/source/Maryland) (2008; *domestic partnership*) - [Oregon](/source/Oregon) (2008; *domestic partnership*) - [Colorado](/source/Colorado) (*designated beneficiary agreement* since 2009, *civil union* since 2013)[24] - [Nevada](/source/Nevada) (2009; *domestic partnership*)[25] - [Illinois](/source/Illinois) (2011; *civil union*) - [France](/source/France) (French: *pacte civil de solidarité*) - [French Guiana](/source/French_Guiana) (1999) - [Guadeloupe](/source/Guadeloupe) (1999) - [Martinique](/source/Martinique) (1999) - [Saint Barthélemy](/source/Saint_Barth%C3%A9lemy) (1999) - [Saint Martin](/source/Collectivity_of_Saint_Martin) (1999) - [Saint-Pierre and Miquelon](/source/Saint_Pierre_and_Miquelon) (1999) - [Canada](/source/Canada): - [Nova Scotia](/source/Nova_Scotia) (2001; *domestic partnership*)[26] - [Quebec](/source/Quebec) (2002; *civil union* / *union civile*)[27] - [Alberta](/source/Alberta) (2003; *adult interdependent relationship*)[28] - [Manitoba](/source/Manitoba) (2004; *registered common-law relationship*)[29] - [Mexico](/source/Mexico): - [Coahuila](/source/Coahuila) (2007; Spanish: *pacto civil de solidaridad*)[30] - [Mexico City](/source/Mexico_City) (2007, *sociedad de convivencia*) - [Campeche](/source/Campeche) (2013; *sociedad civil de convivencia*)[31] - [Michoacán](/source/Michoac%C3%A1n) (2015; *sociedad de convivencia*) - [Tlaxcala](/source/Tlaxcala) (2017; *sociedad de convivencia solidaria*) - [Veracruz](/source/Veracruz) (2020; *concubinato*) - [Sinaloa](/source/Sinaloa) (2021; *concubinato*) - [Uruguay](/source/Uruguay) (2008; Spanish: *unión concubinaria*)[32] - [Ecuador](/source/Ecuador) (2008; Spanish: *unión de hecho*)[33] - [Colombia](/source/Colombia) (2009; Spanish: *unión marital de hecho*)[34] - [Brazil](/source/Brazil) (2011, opposite sex since 2003; [Portuguese](/source/Portuguese_language): *união estável*)[35] - [Netherlands](/source/Kingdom_of_the_Netherlands): ([Dutch](/source/Dutch_language): *geregistreerd partnerschap*) - [Caribbean Netherlands](/source/Caribbean_Netherlands) (2012) - [Aruba](/source/Aruba) (2021; [Papiamento](/source/Papiamento_language): *union civil*; [Dutch](/source/Dutch_language): *geregistreerd partnerschap*)[36] - [Argentina](/source/Argentina): (2015; [Spanish](/source/Spanish_language): *unión convivencial*)[37] - [Buenos Aires](/source/Buenos_Aires) (2003; Spanish: *unión civil*)[38] - [Río Negro](/source/R%C3%ADo_Negro_Province) (2003; *pareja convivencial homosexual*)[39] - City of [Villa Carlos Paz](/source/Villa_Carlos_Paz) (2007; *unión civil*)[40] - City of [Río Cuarto](/source/R%C3%ADo_Cuarto%2C_C%C3%B3rdoba) (2009; *unión civil*)[41] - [Chile](/source/Chile) (2015; Spanish: *acuerdo de unión civil*)[42] - [United Kingdom](/source/United_Kingdom): - [Falkland Islands](/source/Falkland_Islands) (2017; *civil partnership*)[43] - [Bermuda](/source/Bermuda) (2018; *domestic partnership*)[44] - [Cayman Islands](/source/Cayman_Islands) (2020; *civil partnership*)[45] - [Bolivia](/source/Bolivia) (free unions starting in 2020, nationwide since 2023; [Spanish](/source/Spanish_language): *unión libre*) ### Asia - [Japan](/source/Japan) ([Japanese](/source/Japanese_language): パートナーシップ宣誓制度 or パートナーシップ証明制度) - [Ibaraki](/source/Ibaraki_Prefecture) (2019) - [Osaka](/source/Osaka_Prefecture) (2020) - [Gunma](/source/Gunma_Prefecture) (2020) - [Saga](/source/Saga_Prefecture) (2021) - [Mie](/source/Mie_Prefecture) (2021) - [Aomori](/source/Aomori_Prefecture) (2022) - [Akita](/source/Akita_Prefecture) (2022) - [Fukuoka](/source/Fukuoka_Prefecture) (2022) - [Tochigi](/source/Tochigi_Prefecture) (2022) - [Tokyo](/source/Tokyo) (2022) - [Shizuoka](/source/Shizuoka_Prefecture) (2023) - [Toyama](/source/Toyama_Prefecture) (2023) - [Nagano](/source/Nagano_Prefecture) (2023) - [Gifu](/source/Gifu_Prefecture) (2023) - [Kagawa](/source/Kagawa_Prefecture) (2023) - [Shimane](/source/Shimane_Prefecture) (2023) - [Tottori](/source/Tottori_Prefecture) (2023) - [Fukui](/source/Fukui_Prefecture) (2023) - [Yamanashi](/source/Yamanashi_Prefecture) (2023) - [Yamagata](/source/Yamagata_Prefecture) (2024) - [Wakayama](/source/Wakayama_Prefecture) (2024) - [Aichi](/source/Aichi_Prefecture) (2024) - [Hyōgo](/source/Hy%C5%8Dgo_Prefecture) (2024) - [Nara](/source/Nara_Prefecture) (2024) - [Ōita](/source/%C5%8Cita_Prefecture) (2024) - [Tokushima](/source/Tokushima_Prefecture) (2024) - [Yamaguchi](/source/Yamaguchi_Prefecture) (2024) - [Fukushima](/source/Fukushima_Prefecture) (2024) - [Niigata](/source/Niigata_Prefecture) (2024) - [Shiga](/source/Shiga_Prefecture) (2024) - [Okinawa](/source/Okinawa_Prefecture) (2025) - [559 municipalities](/source/Partnership_oath_in_Japan#List_of_partnership_oath_systems) ### Europe - [Netherlands](/source/Netherlands) (1998; [Dutch](/source/Dutch_language): *geregistreerd partnerschap*)[46] - [Spain](/source/Spain): - [Catalonia](/source/Catalonia) (1998; [Catalan](/source/Catalan_language): *parella estable*, [Spanish](/source/Spanish_language): *pareja estable*, [Occitan](/source/Occitan_language): *coble estable*)[47] - [Aragon](/source/Aragon) (1999; [Spanish](/source/Spanish_language): *pareja estable*)[48][49] - [Castile-La Mancha](/source/Castilla%E2%80%93La_Mancha) (2000; *pareja de hecho*)[50] - [Navarra](/source/Navarre) (2000; [Spanish](/source/Spanish_language): *pareja estable*, [Basque](/source/Basque_language): *bikote egonkorra*)[51] - [Valencia](/source/Valencian_Community) (2001; [Spanish](/source/Spanish_language): *unión de hecho*, [Valencian](/source/Valencian_language): *unió de fet*)[52] - [Balearic Islands](/source/Balearic_Islands) (2002; [Catalan](/source/Catalan_language): *parella estable*, [Spanish](/source/Spanish_language): *pareja estable*)[53] - [Andalusia](/source/Andalusia) (2002; *pareja de hecho*)[54] - [Asturias](/source/Asturias) (2002; [Spanish](/source/Spanish_language): *pareja estable*, [Asturian](/source/Asturian_language): *pareya estable*)[55] - [Madrid](/source/Community_of_Madrid) (2002; *unión de hecho*)[56][57] - [Castile and León](/source/Castile_and_Le%C3%B3n) (2002; *unión de hecho*)[58] - [Extremadura](/source/Extremadura) (2003; *pareja de hecho*)[59] - [Basque Country](/source/Basque_Country_(autonomous_community)) (2003; [Basque](/source/Basque_language): *izatezko bikote*, [Spanish](/source/Spanish_language): *pareja de hecho*)[60] - [Cantabria](/source/Cantabria) (2005; [Spanish](/source/Spanish_language): *pareja de hecho*)[61] - [Galicia](/source/Galicia_(Spain)) (2008; [Galician](/source/Galician_language): *parella de feito*, [Spanish](/source/Spanish_language): *pareja de hecho*)[62][63] - [La Rioja](/source/La_Rioja) (2010; *pareja de hecho*)[64] - [Murcia](/source/Region_of_Murcia) (2018; *pareja de hecho*)[65] - [France](/source/France) (1999; [French](/source/French_language): *pacte civil de solidarité*)[66] - [Belgium](/source/Belgium) (2000; [Dutch](/source/Dutch_language): *wettelijke samenwoning*, French: *cohabitation légale*, [German](/source/German_language): *gesetzliches Zusammenwohnen*)[67] - [Portugal](/source/Portugal) (2001; [Portuguese](/source/Portuguese_language): *união de facto*)[68] opposite-sex since 1999. - [Luxembourg](/source/Luxembourg) (2004; French: *partenariat*, [Luxembourgish](/source/Luxembourgish_language) and German: *Partnerschaft*)[69] - [Andorra](/source/Andorra) (2005; [Catalan](/source/Catalan_language): *unió estable de parella*)[70] - [United Kingdom](/source/United_Kingdom) (2005; *civil partnership*, [Welsh](/source/Welsh_language): *partneriaeth sifil*)[71] - [Isle of Man](/source/Isle_of_Man) (2011; *civil partnership*)[72] - [Jersey](/source/Jersey) (2012; *civil partnership*)[73] - [Gibraltar](/source/Gibraltar) (2014; *civil partnership*)[74] - [Czech Republic](/source/Czech_Republic) (2006; [Czech](/source/Czech_language): *registrované partnerství*)[75] - [Hungary](/source/Hungary) (2009; [Hungarian](/source/Hungarian_language): *bejegyzett élettársi kapcsolat*)[76] - [Austria](/source/Austria) (2010; German: *eingetragene Partnerschaft*)[77] - [Liechtenstein](/source/Liechtenstein) (2011; German: *eingetragene Partnerschaft*)[78] - [Malta](/source/Malta) (2014; *civil union*, [Maltese](/source/Maltese_language): *unjoni ċivili*)[79] - [Croatia](/source/Croatia) (2014; [Croatian](/source/Croatian_language): *životno partnerstvo*)[80] - [Cyprus](/source/Cyprus) (2015; [Greek](/source/Greek_language): πολιτική συμβίωση, [Turkish](/source/Turkish_language): *sivil birlikte yaşama*) - [Greece](/source/Greece) (2015; Greek: σύμφωνο συμβίωσης)[81][82] opposite-sex since 2008. - [Estonia](/source/Estonia) (2016; [Estonian](/source/Estonian_language): *kooseluleping*)[83] - [Italy](/source/Italy) (2016; [Italian](/source/Italian_language): *unione civile*)[84] - [San Marino](/source/San_Marino) (2018; [Italian](/source/Italian_language): *unione civile*)[85] - [Monaco](/source/Monaco) (2020; French: *contrat de vie commune*, [Monégasque](/source/Mon%C3%A9gasque_dialect): *contràtto de vìtta comûne*)[86] - [Montenegro](/source/Montenegro) (2021; [Montenegrin](/source/Montenegrin_language): животно партнерство, *životno partnerstvo*)[87] - [Latvia](/source/Latvia) (2024; [Latvian](/source/Latvian_language): *partnerība*)[88] - [Lithuania](/source/Lithuania) (2025, through courts only; [Lithuanian](/source/Lithuanian_language): *partnerystė*)[89] ### Oceania - [Australia](/source/Australia): - [Tasmania](/source/Tasmania) (2004; *significant relationship* and *caring relationship*)[90] - [South Australia](/source/South_Australia) (*domestic partnership* since 2007, *registered relationship* since 2017)[91] - [Australian Capital Territory](/source/Australian_Capital_Territory) (*domestic relationship* since 1994)[92] - [Victoria](/source/Victoria_(state)) (2008; *domestic relationship*)[93] - [New South Wales](/source/New_South_Wales) (*de facto couple* since 1999, *registered relationship* since 2010)[94] - [Queensland](/source/Queensland) (*de facto recognition* since 1999, *civil partnership* since 2012)[95] - [New Zealand](/source/New_Zealand) (2005; *civil union*, [Māori](/source/M%C4%81ori_language): *hononga ā-ture*)[96] - [France](/source/France) ([French](/source/French_language): *pacte civil de solidarité*) - [New Caledonia](/source/New_Caledonia) (2009)[97] - [Wallis and Futuna](/source/Wallis_and_Futuna) (2009)[97] ### Countries with former civil unions   Gender-neutral civil unions   Civil unions for opposite-sex couples only   Civil unions for same-sex couples only   Former civil unions for same-sex couples, replaced by marriage   Civil unions not performed Several countries used to offer civil unions only for same-sex couples. The laws that allowed civil unions were repealed when same-sex marriage was legalized. The following is a list of countries and other jurisdictions that used to offer civil unions for same-sex couples with the years in which they were available in brackets: #### Europe - [Denmark](/source/Denmark) (1989–2012; [Danish](/source/Danish_language): *registreret partnerskab*) - [Greenland](/source/Greenland) (1996–2016; [Greenlandic](/source/Greenlandic_language): *nalunaarsukkamik inooqatigiinneq*) - [Norway](/source/Norway) (1993–2008; [Norwegian](/source/Norwegian_language): *registrert partnerskap*, [Northern Sami](/source/Northern_Sami_language): *registrerejuvvon párragaskavuohta*, [Lule Sami](/source/Lule_Sami_language): *registardum guojmmevuohta*; [Southern Sami](/source/Southern_Sami_language): *tjaalasovveme guejmievoete*) - [Sweden](/source/Sweden) (1995–2009; [Swedish](/source/Swedish_language): *registrerat partnerskap*) - [Iceland](/source/Iceland) (1996–2010; [Icelandic](/source/Icelandic_language): *staðfesta samvist*) - [Germany](/source/Germany) (2001–2017; [German](/source/German_language): *eingetragene Lebenspartnerschaft*)[98] - [Finland](/source/Finland) (2002–2017; [Finnish](/source/Finnish_language): *rekisteröity parisuhde*, [Swedish](/source/Swedish_language): *registrerat partnerskap*) - [Slovenia](/source/Slovenia) (2006–2016 as *partnerska skupnost*; 2016–2022 as *partnerska zveza*)[99] - [Switzerland](/source/Switzerland) (2007–2022; German: *eingetragene Partnerschaft*, French: *partenariat enregistré*, [Italian](/source/Italian_language): *unione domestica registrata*, [Romansh](/source/Romansh_language): *partenadi registrà*)[100] - [Geneva](/source/Canton_of_Geneva) (2001–2022) - [Zurich](/source/Canton_of_Zurich) (2002–2022) - [Neuchâtel](/source/Canton_of_Neuch%C3%A2tel) (2004–2022) - [Fribourg](/source/Canton_of_Fribourg) (2005–2022) - [Ireland](/source/Republic_of_Ireland) (2010–2015; *civil partnership*, [Irish](/source/Irish_language): *páirtnéireacht shibhialta*) - [Andorra](/source/Andorra) (2014–2023; [Catalan](/source/Catalan_language): *unió civil*) #### Americas - [United States](/source/United_States): - [Vermont](/source/Vermont) (2000–2009; *civil union*) - [Connecticut](/source/Connecticut) (2005–2010; *civil union*) - [New Hampshire](/source/New_Hampshire) (2008–2010; *civil union*) - [Wisconsin](/source/Wisconsin) (2009–2018; *domestic partnership*) - [Rhode Island](/source/Rhode_Island) (2011–2013; *civil union*) - [Delaware](/source/Delaware) (2011–2013; *civil union*) - [Mexico](/source/Mexico): - [Colima](/source/Colima) (2013–2016; [Spanish](/source/Spanish_language): *enlace conyugal*) - [Jalisco](/source/Jalisco) (2014–2018; [Spanish](/source/Spanish_language): *libre convivencia*)[101] #### Asia - [Taiwan](/source/Taiwan) ([Chinese](/source/Chinese_language): 同性伴侶註記) - [Special municipalities](/source/Special_municipality_(Taiwan)) (6/6) - [Kaohsiung](/source/Kaohsiung) (2015–2019)[102] - [Taipei](/source/Taipei) (2015–2019)[103] - [Taichung](/source/Taichung) (2015–2019)[104] - [Tainan](/source/Tainan) (2016–2019)[105] - [New Taipei](/source/New_Taipei) (2016–2019)[106] - [Taoyuan](/source/Taoyuan%2C_Taiwan) (2016–2019)[107] - [Provincial cities](/source/Provincial_city_(Taiwan)) (3/3) - [Chiayi](/source/Chiayi) (2016–2019)[108] - [Hsinchu](/source/Hsinchu) (2017–2019)[109] - [Keelung](/source/Keelung) (2017–2019)[110] - [Counties](/source/County_(Taiwan)) (9/13) - [Changhua County](/source/Changhua_County) (2016–2019)[111] - [Hsinchu County](/source/Hsinchu_County) (2016–2019)[112] - [Yilan County](/source/Yilan_County%2C_Taiwan) (2016–2019)[113] - [Chiayi County](/source/Chiayi_County) (2016–2019)[114] - [Kinmen County](/source/Kinmen) (2017–2019)[109] - [Lienchiang County](/source/Lienchiang_County) (2017–2019)[109] - [Miaoli County](/source/Miaoli_County) (2017–2019)[109] - [Nantou County](/source/Nantou_County) (2017–2019)[109] - [Pingtung County](/source/Pingtung_County) (2017–2019)[109] #### Oceania - [Australia](/source/Australia): - [Australian Capital Territory](/source/Australian_Capital_Territory) (*civil partnership* since 2008; *civil union* between 2012 and 2017) ## Case studies ### Argentina Main article: [Same-sex marriage in Argentina](/source/Same-sex_marriage_in_Argentina) Since 2003, the Argentine province of [Río Negro](/source/R%C3%ADo_Negro_Province) and the city of [Buenos Aires](/source/Buenos_Aires) allow domestic partnerships. The City of [Villa Carlos Paz](/source/Villa_Carlos_Paz) (Córdoba) allowed it from 2007. Since 2009, the city of [Río Cuarto](/source/R%C3%ADo_Cuarto%2C_C%C3%B3rdoba) (Córdoba) allows Civil Unions. ### Australia Main article: [Same-sex marriage in Australia](/source/Same-sex_marriage_in_Australia) All levels of Australian governments under nearly all Australian statutes recognise same-sex couples as *de facto* couples as [unregistered](/source/Relationship_register) co-habitation or *de facto* status since 2009.[115] From 1 July 2009, Centrelink recognised same-sex couples equally regarding social security – under the common-law marriage, de facto status or unregistered cohabitation.[116] **Registered relationship recognition in state governments** State or territory Official relationship status Year of enactment Australian Capital Territory Civil partnership 2008 New South Wales Registered relationship 2010 Queensland Civil partnership 2012 Tasmania Significant relationship 2004 Victoria Registered domestic relationship 2008 South Australia Registered relationship 2017 **Registered relationship recognition in five local government areas within Australia** - [City of Sydney](/source/City_of_Sydney), [New South Wales](/source/New_South_Wales) – Registered relationships since 2004[117] - [Municipality of Woollahra](/source/Municipality_of_Woollahra), [New South Wales](/source/New_South_Wales) – Registered relationships since 2008[118] - [City of the Blue Mountains](/source/City_of_the_Blue_Mountains), [New South Wales](/source/New_South_Wales) – Registered relationships since 2010[119] - [City of Vincent](/source/City_of_Vincent), [Western Australia](/source/Western_Australia) – Registered relationships since 2012[120] - [Town of Port Hedland](/source/Town_of_Port_Hedland), [Western Australia](/source/Western_Australia) – Registered relationships since 2015.[121] ### Brazil Main article: [Same-sex marriage in Brazil](/source/Same-sex_marriage_in_Brazil) **Countries performing civil unions in South America**   Gender-neutral civil unions   Civil unions for opposite-sex couples only   Civil unions never performed Cohabitation grants 112 benefits as family entities in Brazil since 2002. It is known as *união estável* when both parts are legally authorized to marry, and as *concubinato* when at least one party is legally prohibited from doing so.[122] Cohabitation grants all rights marriage confers, with the exception of automatic opt-in for one of four systems of property share married couples have access to, and automatic right to inheritance. Potential confusion might arise regarding terminology, given how when Brazilian Portuguese refers to the term *união civil*, it tends to be short for *casamento civil*, or civil marriage. Couples that have at least one child registered as a descendant of both parties might also have access to *união estável* or *concubinato* rights. Same-sex stable cohabitation in Brazil is legally recognized nationwide since May 5, 2011. Brazil's Supreme Court voted 10–0 with one abstention to allow [same-sex couples](/source/Same-sex_couple) the same legal rights as married couples, following pointed recognition of such relationships that dates as far back as 2004. The ruling gave same-sex couples in such relationships the same financial and social rights enjoyed by those in mixed-sex ones.[123] A union between two women and one man was reported in August 2012, though its legality was doubted.[124] ### Canada Main article: [Same-sex marriage in Canada](/source/Same-sex_marriage_in_Canada) **Jurisdictions performing civil unions in North America**   Gender-neutral civil unions   Former civil unions for same-sex couples, replaced by marriage   Civil unions never performed In [Canada](/source/Canada): - [Domestic partnerships](/source/Domestic_partnership_in_Nova_Scotia) in [Nova Scotia](/source/Nova_Scotia) (2001), - [Civil unions](/source/Civil_unions_in_Quebec) in [Quebec](/source/Quebec) (2002), - [Registered common-law relationships](/source/Common-law_relationships_in_Manitoba) in [Manitoba](/source/Manitoba) (2002),[a] - [Adult interdependent relationships](/source/Adult_interdependent_relationship_in_Alberta) in [Alberta](/source/Alberta) (2003) were extended to same-sex couples before the enactment of the federal *[Civil Marriage Act](/source/Civil_Marriage_Act)* which legalized [same-sex marriage in Canada](/source/Same-sex_marriage_in_Canada) nationally. The 1994 proposed [Equality Rights Statute Amendment Act](/source/Equality_Rights_Statute_Amendment_Act) in [Ontario](/source/Ontario) was a notable early attempt to introduce a status similar to civil unions. It was supported by the provincial government but was defeated in the legislature.[125] Some provinces and territories amended their family law to extend statutory benefits to same-sex couples that were equivalent to those granted to unmarried cohabiting opposite-sex couples without establishing a specific name for the partnership. For example, Ontario was required to amend its family law legislation in 1999 in response to the [Supreme Court of Canada](/source/Supreme_Court_of_Canada)'s ruling in *[M v H](/source/M_v_H)*. ### Colombia Main article: [Same-sex marriage in Colombia](/source/Same-sex_marriage_in_Colombia) In 2007, [Colombia](/source/Colombia) came close to passing a law granting legal recognition to same-sex couples, but the bill failed on final passage in one house of the national legislature. However, a court decision in October 2007 extended social security and health insurance rights to same-sex couples.[126] On January 29, 2009, the Constitutional Court ruled that cohabitating same-sex couples must be given all rights offered to unmarried heterosexual couples,[127] making Colombia the first Latin American country to fully grant this right to all its citizens. Couples can claim these rights after living together for two years. The Constitutional Court of Colombia upheld same-sex marriage rights in 2016.[128][129] ### Costa Rica Main article: [Recognition of same-sex unions in Costa Rica](/source/Recognition_of_same-sex_unions_in_Costa_Rica) The [Legislative Assembly of Costa Rica](/source/Legislative_Assembly_of_Costa_Rica) passed a bill in early July 2013 that "confers social rights and benefits of a civil union, free from discrimination", language inserted by lawmaker [José María Villalta Florez-Estrada](/source/Jos%C3%A9_Mar%C3%ADa_Villalta_Florez-Estrada) of the [Broad Front](/source/Broad_Front_(Costa_Rica)) party. After the bill passed, several media outlets reported that conservative lawmakers realized the bill's implications for same-sex unions and urged President [Laura Chinchilla](/source/Laura_Chinchilla), who is set to face Villalta in the 2014 presidential election, to use her [veto](/source/Veto) power to stop the bill from becoming law. Chinchilla, who has suggested the courts should determine the legality of same-sex unions in Costa Rica, refused and signed the bill into law on 4 July. A gay couple has filed an appeal with the [Supreme Court of Justice of Costa Rica](/source/Supreme_Court_of_Justice_of_Costa_Rica) asking that their union be recognized under the new law.[130] Gay rights activists reacting to the law said it needs to survive a constitutional challenge in court.[131][132] Some constitutional lawyers stated that same-sex couples will "still lack legal capacity" to formalize their unions, despite passage of the bill.[133] ### Ecuador Main article: [Recognition of same-sex unions in Ecuador](/source/Recognition_of_same-sex_unions_in_Ecuador) The [2008 Constitution of Ecuador](/source/2008_Constitution_of_Ecuador) enacted civil unions between two people without regard to gender, giving same-sex couples the same rights as legally married heterosexual couples except for the right to adopt.[134] ### Europe Main article: [Recognition of same-sex unions in Europe](/source/Recognition_of_same-sex_unions_in_Europe) **Countries performing civil unions in Europe**   Gender-neutral civil unions   Civil unions for same-sex couples only   Former civil unions for same-sex couples, replaced by marriage   Civil unions never performed In Europe: - [Denmark](/source/Same-sex_marriage_in_Denmark) (1989–2012; same-sex only) - [Norway](/source/Same-sex_marriage_in_Norway) (1993–2009; same-sex only) - [Sweden](/source/Same-sex_marriage_in_Sweden) (1995–2009; same-sex only) - [Iceland](/source/Same-sex_marriage_in_Iceland) (1996–2010; same-sex only) - [Greenland](/source/LGBT_rights_in_Greenland) (1996–2016; same-sex only) - [Netherlands](/source/Same-sex_marriage_in_the_Netherlands) (1998; gender-neutral) - [France](/source/Civil_solidarity_pact) (1999; gender-neutral) - [Belgium](/source/Same-sex_marriage_in_Belgium) (2000; gender-neutral) - [Germany](/source/Same-sex_marriage_in_Germany) (2001–2017; same-sex only) - [Finland](/source/Same-sex_marriage_in_Finland) (2002–2017; same-sex only) - [Luxembourg](/source/Same-sex_marriage_in_Luxembourg) (2004; gender-neutral) - [Andorra](/source/Recognition_of_same-sex_unions_in_Andorra) (2005; gender-neutral) - [United Kingdom](/source/Civil_partnership_in_the_United_Kingdom) (2005, same-sex only; gender-neutral in [England and Wales](/source/England_and_Wales) since 2019, in [Northern Ireland](/source/Northern_Ireland) since 2020, in [Scotland](/source/Scotland) since 2021) - [Czech Republic](/source/Recognition_of_same-sex_unions_in_the_Czech_Republic) (2006; same-sex only) - [Slovenia](/source/Recognition_of_same-sex_unions_in_Slovenia) (2006–2022; same-sex only) - [Switzerland](/source/Registered_partnership_in_Switzerland) (2007–2022; same-sex only) - [Greece](/source/Recognition_of_same-sex_unions_in_Greece) (2008; initially opposite-sex only, gender-neutral since 2015 ) - [Hungary](/source/Recognition_of_same-sex_unions_in_Hungary) (2009; same-sex only) - [Austria](/source/Same-sex_marriage_in_Austria) (2010; same-sex only, gender-neutral since 2019) - [Ireland](/source/Same-sex_marriage_in_the_Republic_of_Ireland) (2011–2015; same-sex only) - [Isle of Man](/source/Same-sex_marriage_in_the_Isle_of_Man) (2011; same-sex only, gender-neutral since 2016) - [Liechtenstein](/source/Recognition_of_same-sex_unions_in_Liechtenstein) (2011; same-sex only) - [Jersey](/source/Same-sex_marriage_in_Jersey) (2012; same-sex only, gender-neutral since 2023) - [Gibraltar](/source/Same-sex_marriage_in_Gibraltar) (2014; gender-neutral) - [Malta](/source/Same-sex_marriage_in_Malta) (2014; gender-neutral) - [Croatia](/source/Recognition_of_same-sex_unions_in_Croatia) (2014; same-sex only) - [Andorra](/source/Recognition_of_same-sex_unions_in_Andorra) (2014–2023; same-sex only) - [Cyprus](/source/Recognition_of_same-sex_unions_in_Cyprus) (2015; gender-neutral) - [Estonia](/source/Recognition_of_same-sex_unions_in_Estonia) (2016; gender-neutral) - [Italy](/source/Recognition_of_same-sex_unions_in_Italy) (2016; same-sex only) - [San Marino](/source/Recognition_of_same-sex_unions_in_San_Marino) (2018; gender-neutral) - [Monaco](/source/Recognition_of_same-sex_unions_in_Monaco) (2020; gender-neutral) - [Montenegro](/source/Recognition_of_same-sex_unions_in_Montenegro) (2021; same-sex only) - [Latvia](/source/Recognition_of_same-sex_unions_in_Latvia) (2024; gender-neutral) - [Lithuania](/source/Recognition_of_same-sex_unions_in_Lithuania) (2025; gender-neutral) #### Andorra Main article: [Recognition of same-sex unions in Andorra](/source/Recognition_of_same-sex_unions_in_Andorra) #### Austria Main article: [Recognition of same-sex unions in Austria](/source/Recognition_of_same-sex_unions_in_Austria) In 2018, Minister of Justice Josef Moser announced that both marriage and registered partnership would be open to homosexuals and heterosexuals. This occurred because Helga Ratzenböck and Martin Seydl have been appealing for years[*[timeframe?](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Words_to_watch#Relative_time_references)*] in court for a registered civil partnership in Austria. At the [European Court of Human Rights](/source/European_Court_of_Human_Rights) in Strasbourg they attempted to sue Austria for discrimination against their sexuality,[*[when?](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Dates_and_numbers#Chronological_items)*] because they were a heterosexual couple and were excluded from the benefits of registered partnership, but this failed.[135][136] Only when the Constitutional Court of Austria opened up marriage to homosexuals in December 2018 registered partnerships also become possible for heterosexuals. After 35 years of living together, the two entered into a registered partnership in 2019.[137] #### Croatia Main article: [Recognition of same-sex unions in Croatia](/source/Recognition_of_same-sex_unions_in_Croatia) #### Cyprus Main article: [Recognition of same-sex unions in Cyprus](/source/Recognition_of_same-sex_unions_in_Cyprus) #### Czech Republic Main article: [Recognition of same-sex unions in the Czech Republic](/source/Recognition_of_same-sex_unions_in_the_Czech_Republic) #### Denmark Main article: [Same-sex marriage in Denmark](/source/Same-sex_marriage_in_Denmark) Civil unions were introduced in [Denmark](/source/Denmark) by law on 7 June 1989, the world's first such law, and came into effect on 1 October 1989. On 7 June 2012, the law was replaced by a new same-sex marriage law, which came into effect on 15 June 2012.[138] Registered partnership was by civil ceremony only, but the [Church of Denmark](/source/Church_of_Denmark) allowed priests to perform blessings of same-sex couples, as it stated that the church blesses people, not institutions. The new law makes same-sex marriages in churches possible, but allows vicars to decline marriages of same-sex couples in their church.[138] On 17 March 2009, the [Folketing](/source/Folketing) introduced a bill that gave same-sex couples in registered partnerships the right to [adopt jointly](/source/LGBT_adoption).[139] This bill was approved on 4 May 2010 and took effect on 1 July 2010.[140] #### Estonia Main article: [Same-sex marriage in Estonia](/source/Same-sex_marriage_in_Estonia) Registered partnerships that provide some of the rights, benefits, and obligations of marriage have been available to same-sex couples since 1 January 2016.[141] #### France PACS (blue) and marriage (red) in France ([INSEE](/source/INSEE)) Main article: [Civil solidarity pact](/source/Civil_solidarity_pact) The [French](/source/France) law providing benefits to same-sex couples also applies to opposite-sex couples who choose this form of partnership over marriage. Known as the "Pacte civil de solidarité" (PACS), it is more easily dissolved than the divorce process applying to marriage. Tax benefits accrue immediately (only from 2007 on),[*[citation needed](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Citation_needed)*] while immigration benefits accrue only after the contract has been in effect for one year. The partners are required to have a common address, making it difficult for foreigners to use this law as a means to a residence permit, and difficult for French citizens to gain the right to live with a foreign partner – especially since the contract does not automatically give immigration rights, as marriage does.[142] Between 2000 and 2010, the number of marriages decreased while the number of PACS strongly increased. In 2010, there were 3 PACS for every 4 marriages celebrated in France.[143] Especially amongst heterosexual couples PACS is very popular, with 96 out of 100 PACS couples being heterosexual in the year 2019.[144] **Countries performing civil unions in Central America and the Caribbean Islands**   Gender-neutral civil unions   Civil unions for opposite-sex couples only   Civil unions never performed #### Germany Main article: [Same-sex marriage in Germany](/source/Same-sex_marriage_in_Germany) Civil unions in [Germany](/source/Germany) began in 2001.[145] In 2017, registered life partnership was replaced with marriage, with any couple regardless of sex allowed to marry.[146] #### Greece Main article: [Same-sex marriage in Greece](/source/Same-sex_marriage_in_Greece) Greek parliament voted in favor of a Cohabitation Pact ([Greek](/source/Greek_language): Σύμφωνο Συμβίωσης) giving almost the same rights as marriage to couples regardless of their sex. The draft was approved in the relevant Greek parliamentary committee,[*[when?](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Dates_and_numbers#Chronological_items)*] and during voting on 22 December 2015, the law was passed with 194 positive votes (out of 300).[147] #### Hungary Main article: [Recognition of same-sex unions in Hungary](/source/Recognition_of_same-sex_unions_in_Hungary) Civil unions in [Hungary](/source/Hungary) began in 2009.[148] #### Iceland Main article: [Same-sex marriage in Iceland](/source/Same-sex_marriage_in_Iceland) [Iceland](/source/Iceland) does not have a comprehensive legal act on civil unions ([Icelandic](/source/Icelandic_language): *óvígð sambúð*). Instead, various laws deal with civil unions and their meaning. When Iceland legalised same-sex marriages in 2010, the Act on Registered Partnerships (87/1996) was abolished. Registered partnerships ([Icelandic](/source/Icelandic_language): *staðfest samvist*) had been the principal legal unions for same-sex partners since the law was passed in 1996.[149] #### Ireland In 2010, the lower house of the Irish Parliament [Dáil Éireann](/source/D%C3%A1il_%C3%89ireann) passed the [bill on Civil Partnerships](/source/Civil_Partnership_and_Certain_Rights_and_Obligations_of_Cohabitants_Act_2010) unanimously. This bill allows civil partnerships of same-sex couples, and establishes an extensive package of rights, obligations and protections for same-sex couples who register as civil partners.[150] The bill passed all stages of in both Houses of the Oireachtas,[151] and came into effect on 1 January 2011. The first partnership between two men was registered on 7 February 2011.[152] Same-sex marriage has been [legal in Ireland](/source/Same-sex_marriage_in_the_Republic_of_Ireland) since 2015 following a [referendum](/source/Thirty-fourth_Amendment_of_the_Constitution_of_Ireland).[153] #### Italy Main article: [Recognition of same-sex unions in Italy](/source/Recognition_of_same-sex_unions_in_Italy) Legal recognition of same-sex civil unions in [Italy](/source/Italy) began in 2016.[154][155][156][157] #### Liechtenstein Main article: [Recognition of same-sex unions in Liechtenstein](/source/Recognition_of_same-sex_unions_in_Liechtenstein) Civil unions in [Liechtenstein](/source/Liechtenstein) began in 2011.[158] #### Monaco Main article: [Recognition of same-sex unions in Monaco](/source/Recognition_of_same-sex_unions_in_Monaco) Civil unions in [Monaco](/source/Monaco) began in 2020.[159] #### Montenegro Main article: [Recognition of same-sex unions in Montenegro](/source/Recognition_of_same-sex_unions_in_Montenegro) Civil unions in [Montenegro](/source/Montenegro) began in 2020.[160][161][162][163] #### Netherlands Main article: [Same-sex marriage in the Netherlands](/source/Same-sex_marriage_in_the_Netherlands) In 2001, the [Netherlands](/source/Netherlands) passed a law allowing same-sex couples to marry, in addition to its 1998 "registered partnership" law (civil union) for both same-sex and opposite-sex couples.[164][165] #### Poland Main article: [Recognition of same-sex unions in Poland](/source/Recognition_of_same-sex_unions_in_Poland) In 2003, Senator [Maria Szyszkowska](/source/Maria_Szyszkowska) proposed a bill which would legalize same-sex civil unions in Poland.[166] The project was approved by the [Senate](/source/Senate_of_Poland) but was never voted upon by the [Sejm](/source/Sejm_of_the_Republic_of_Poland), as [Włodzimierz Cimoszewicz](/source/W%C5%82odzimierz_Cimoszewicz) (then the Marshal of the Sejm) did not bring it for the deliberation. In 2008, when asked about same-sex civil unions, [First Cabinet of Donald Tusk](/source/First_Cabinet_of_Donald_Tusk) spokeswoman Agnieszka Liszka answered: "[Council of Ministers](/source/Cabinet_of_Poland) did not and would not take care of that matter."[167] On January 25, 2013, Sejm voted upon three separate bills regarding same-sex civil unions in Poland: by the centre-left [Democratic Left Alliance](/source/Democratic_Left_Alliance_(Poland)), liberal [Palikot's Movement](/source/Palikot's_Movement) and centre-right [Civic Platform](/source/Civic_Platform). The first bill had 283 against, 137 for, 30 abstaining. The second had 276 against, 150 for, 23 abstaining. The third had 228 against, 211 for, 10 abstaining. All three were rejected, mainly with the votes of centre-right, right-wing and conservative parties: [Polish People's Party](/source/Polish_People's_Party), [Law and Justice](/source/Law_and_Justice) and [United Poland](/source/United_Poland). A majority of deputies from the ruling centre-right [Civic Platform](/source/Civic_Platform) also voted against the first two bills.[168][169][170] The [Roman Catholic Church](/source/Roman_Catholicism_in_Poland) in Poland, [Polish Orthodox Church](/source/Polish_Orthodox_Church), and [Polish Muslims](/source/Islam_in_Poland) opposed all three bills. In March 2013, Prime Minister Donald Tusk officially stated that a new project of civil unions bill would be presented to the parliament "in two months time" (in May 2013), but as of April 2014[\[update\]](https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Civil_union&action=edit)[*[needs update](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Dates_and_numbers#Chronological_items)*] no such initiatives took place. In a 2013 opinion poll conducted by [CBOS](/source/Centrum_Badania_Opinii_Spo%C5%82ecznej), 68% of Poles were against gays and lesbians publicly showing their way of life, 65% of Poles were against same-sex [civil unions](/source/Civil_unions), 72% were against same-sex marriage and 88% were against adoption by same-sex couples.[171] In December 2014, the Sejm refused to deal with a civil partnership bill proposed by [Your Movement](/source/Your_Movement), with 235 MPs voting against debating the bill, and 185 MPs voting for.[172] In May 2015, the Sejm again refused to deal with the topic, with 215 MPs voting against and only 146 for. The Prime Minister, [Ewa Kopacz](/source/Ewa_Kopacz), said that civil partnerships are an issue for the next parliament to deal with.[173] #### San Marino Main article: [Recognition of same-sex unions in San Marino](/source/Recognition_of_same-sex_unions_in_San_Marino) [San Marino](/source/San_Marino) has recognized civil unions for both same-sex and opposite-sex couples since December 2018.[174][175] #### Slovenia Main article: [Same-sex marriage in Slovenia](/source/Same-sex_marriage_in_Slovenia) Slovenia recognized same-sex partnerships since 2006.[176][177] #### Switzerland Main article: [Recognition of same-sex unions in Switzerland](/source/Recognition_of_same-sex_unions_in_Switzerland) The [Canton of Geneva](/source/Canton_of_Geneva) has a law on the cantonal level, the Partenariat cantonal (the Cantonal Domestic Partnership), since 2001. It grants [unmarried couples](/source/Cohabitation), whether same-sex or opposite-sex, many of the rights, responsibilities and protections that [married couples](/source/Married_couples) have. However, it does not allow benefits in taxation, social security, or health insurance premiums (unlike the federal law). Geneva was the first Canton to recognise same-sex couples through this law. On September 22, 2002, voters in the [Swiss](/source/Switzerland) canton of [Zurich](/source/Canton_of_Z%C3%BCrich) voted to extend a number of marriage rights to same-sex partners, including tax, inheritance, and social security benefits.[178] The law is limited to same-sex couples, and both partners must have lived in the canton for six months and formally commit to running a household together and supporting and aiding each another. On November 12, 2003, the [Constituent assembly](/source/Constituent_assembly) of the [Canton of Fribourg](/source/Canton_of_Fribourg) granted Registered Partnership as a constitutional right under the Article 14. On January 27, 2004, the [Canton of Neuchâtel](/source/Canton_of_Neuch%C3%A2tel) voted for a law on the cantonal level, the Partenariat enregistré (the Cantonal Registered Partnership). It grants [unmarried couples](/source/Cohabitation), whether same-sex or opposite-sex, the same rights as married couple for cantonal matters such as responsibilities and protections, benefits in taxation, social security, or health insurance premiums. On June 5, 2005, voters extended this right to the whole of Switzerland through a federal referendum. This was the first time that the civil union laws were affirmed in a nationwide referendum in any country. The Federal Domestic Partnership Law, reserved for same-sex couples, came into force on January 1, 2007. It grants the same rights as marriage, but full joint adoption rights, facilitated naturalization and medically assisted procreation are explicitly forbidden for same-sex domestic partners.[179] In 2017, the Federal Councilor [Simonetta Sommaruga](/source/Simonetta_Sommaruga) addressed the issue that civil union is not open yet for heterosexual couples, in collaboration with experts at the University of Bern. In Geneva and Neuchâtel a type of civil union called cantonal PACS is available to opposite-sex and same-sex couples.[180] The cantonal PACS effects are limited to cantonal law. The cantonal PACS, however, has no impact on civil status and inheritance, which are regulated by federal law.[180] On September 26, 2021, the people of Switzerland approved on national referendum the initiative "Marriage for all", which would grant marriage and adoption rights for same-sex couples. This initiative would be made effective on July 1, 2022. #### United Kingdom Main article: [Civil partnership in the United Kingdom](/source/Civil_partnership_in_the_United_Kingdom) In 2003, the [British](/source/United_Kingdom) government announced plans to introduce civil partnerships which would allow same-sex couples the rights and responsibilities resulting from marriage. The [Civil Partnership Bill](/source/Civil_Partnership_Act_2004) was introduced into the [House of Lords](/source/House_of_Lords) on 30 March 2004. After considering amendments made by the [House of Commons](/source/House_of_Commons_of_the_United_Kingdom), it was passed by the House of Lords, its final legislative step, on 17 November 2004, and received [royal assent](/source/Royal_assent) on 18 November. The Act came into force on 5 December 2005, and same-sex, but not opposite-sex, couples were able to form the civil partnerships from 19 December 2005 in [Northern Ireland](/source/Northern_Ireland), 20 December 2005 in [Scotland](/source/Scotland) and 21 December 2005 in [England](/source/England) and [Wales](/source/Wales).[181] Separate provisions were included in the first Finance Act 2005 to allow regulations to be made to amend tax laws to give the same tax advantages and disadvantages to couples in civil partnerships as apply to married couples. At that time, the [Church of England](/source/Church_of_England), the [state church](/source/State_religion) in England, permitted clergy to enter into same-sex civil partnerships.[182] Aside from the manner in which couples register and the non-use of the word "marriage", civil partnerships grant most of the same legal rights as marriage and generally operate under the same constrictions (one difference being that marriage requires dissolution by divorce while a civil union does not). It is not legal to be in both a civil partnership and a marriage at the same time. Nevertheless, some of those in favour of legal same-sex marriage object that civil partnerships do not grant full equality. Both same-sex marriages and civil unions of other nations will be automatically considered civil partnerships under UK law providing they came within Section 20 of the Act. This means, in some cases, non-Britons from nations with civil unions will have greater rights in the UK than in their native countries. For example, a Vermont civil union would have legal standing in the UK; however, in cases where one partner was American and the other British, the Vermont civil union would not provide the Briton with right of abode in Vermont (or any other US state or territory), whereas it would provide the American with right of abode in the UK. In September 2011, the succeeding [coalition government](/source/Cameron%E2%80%93Clegg_coalition) announced its intention to legalise same-sex marriage in England and Wales by 2015 at the latest.[183] The future status of civil partnerships is unclear. The [Scottish Government](/source/Scottish_Government), which has devolved responsibility for such legislation, held a public consultation concerning both civil and religious same sex marriage from 2 September – 9 December 2011.[184][185] Legislation to allow same-sex marriage in England and Wales was passed by the Parliament of the United Kingdom in July 2013 and came into force on 13 March 2014, and the first same-sex marriages took place on 29 March 2014. The first same-sex marriages in Scotland took place in December 2014. In June 2018, the Supreme Court ruled that restricting civil partnerships to same-sex couples was discriminatory.[186] In response, the Prime Minister announced in October 2018 that civil partnerships would be opened to heterosexual couples.[187] In autumn 2018 Theresa May announced that she would open up the "Civil Partnership" to heterosexual couples in England.[188] As of 31st December 2019 it is possible for both same-sex and heterosexual couples to enter into a civil partnership in England.[189] ### Mexico Main articles: [Same-sex marriage in Mexico](/source/Same-sex_marriage_in_Mexico) and [Same-sex marriage in Mexico City](/source/Same-sex_marriage_in_Mexico_City) **States performing civil unions in Mexico**   Gender-neutral civil unions   Former civil unions for same-sex couples, replaced by marriage   Civil unions never performed On 9 November 2006, [Mexico City](/source/Mexico_City)'s [unicameral](/source/Unicameral) [Legislative Assembly](/source/Legislative_Assembly_of_the_Federal_District) passed and approved (43–17) a bill legalizing [same-sex civil unions](/source/Recognition_of_same-sex_unions_in_Mexico), under the name *Ley de Sociedades de Convivencia* (Law for Co-existence Partnerships), which became effective on 16 March 2007.[190] The law gives [property](/source/Property) and [inheritance](/source/Inheritance) rights to same-sex couples. On 11 January 2007, the northern state of [Coahuila](/source/Coahuila), which borders Texas, passed a similar bill (20–13), under the name *Pacto Civil de Solidaridad* (Civil Pact of Solidarity).[191] Unlike Mexico City's law, once same-sex couples have registered in Coahuila, the state protects their rights no matter where they live in the country.[191] Twenty days after the law had passed,[*[when?](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Dates_and_numbers#Chronological_items)*] the country's first same-sex civil union took place in [Saltillo, Coahuila](/source/Saltillo%2C_Coahuila).[192] Civil unions have been proposed in at least six states since 2006.[193] In [Colima](/source/Colima), governor [Mario Anguiano Moreno](/source/Mario_Anguiano_Moreno) agreed to discuss the legalization of civil unions and adoption by same-sex couples.[194][*[when?](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Dates_and_numbers#Chronological_items)*] In [Jalisco](/source/Jalisco), local congress approved on 31 October 2013 the Free Coexistence Act, which allows the performance of civil unions in the state.[195] ### New Zealand Main article: [Civil union in New Zealand](/source/Civil_union_in_New_Zealand) **Countries performing civil unions in Oceania**   Gender-neutral civil unions   Civil unions never performed On 9 December 2004, the [New Zealand](/source/New_Zealand) [Parliament](/source/Parliament_of_New_Zealand) passed the Civil Union Bill, establishing civil unions for same-sex and opposite-sex couples.[196][197] The debate over Civil Unions was highly divisive in New Zealand, inspiring great public emotion both for and against the passing. A companion bill, the Relationships (Statutory References) Bill was passed shortly thereafter to remove discriminatory provisions on the basis of relationship status from a range of statutes and regulations. As a result of these bills, all couples in New Zealand, whether married, in a civil union, or in a de facto partnership, now generally enjoy the same rights and undertake the same obligations. These rights extend to immigration, next-of-kin status, social welfare, matrimonial property and other areas. The [Civil Union Act 2004](/source/Civil_Union_Act_2004) came into effect on 26 April 2005 with the first unions able to occur from Friday 29 April 2005. ### South Africa Main article: [Civil partnership in South Africa](/source/Civil_partnership_in_South_Africa) **Countries performing civil unions in Africa**   Gender-neutral civil unions   Civil unions never performed In [South Africa](/source/South_Africa), a "civil union" is either a marriage or a civil partnership, although the term "civil union" is commonly used when "civil partnership" is meant. Same-sex and opposite-sex couples may register their unions either as [marriages](/source/Same-sex_marriage_in_South_Africa) or as civil partnerships. This was achieved through the [Civil Union Act, 2006](/source/Civil_Union_Act%2C_2006).[198][199] In laws where "marriage" is mentioned, its definition now retroactively includes civil partnerships. ### United States Main articles: [Same-sex unions in the United States](/source/Same-sex_unions_in_the_United_States) and [Domestic partnership in the United States](/source/Domestic_partnership_in_the_United_States) This section needs more citations. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources in this section. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (April 2021) (Learn how and when to remove this message) **States performing civil unions**   Civil union   Civil union with limited rights   Civil unions not performed   Civil unions forbidden The first civil unions in the United States were offered by the state of [Vermont](/source/Same-sex_marriage_in_Vermont) in 2000.[200] The [federal government](/source/United_States_government) does not recognize these unions. By the end of 2006, [Connecticut](/source/Same-sex_marriage_in_Connecticut)[201] and New Jersey[202] had also enacted civil union laws; [New Hampshire](/source/Same-sex_marriage_in_New_Hampshire) followed in 2007.[203] Furthermore, California's domestic partnership law had been expanded to the point that it became practically a civil union law as well. The same might be said[*[by whom?](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Words_to_watch#Unsupported_attributions)*] for domestic partnership in the District of Columbia, domestic partnership in Washington, and domestic partnership in Oregon. Jurisdictions in the U.S. that offer civil unions or domestic partnerships granting nearly all of the state-recognized rights of marriage to same-sex couples include: - [Domestic partnership in California](/source/Domestic_partnership_in_California) (2000 – expanded over time) - [Domestic partnership in the District of Columbia](/source/Same-sex_marriage_in_the_District_of_Columbia) (1992 law implemented, 2002 became effective – expanded over time) - [Civil union in Hawaii](/source/Recognition_of_same-sex_unions_in_Hawaii) (2012) - [Civil union in Illinois](/source/Recognition_of_same-sex_unions_in_Illinois) (2011) - [Domestic partnership in Nevada](/source/Recognition_of_same-sex_unions_in_Nevada) (2009) - [Civil union in New Jersey](/source/Recognition_of_same-sex_unions_in_New_Jersey) (2007) - [Domestic partnership in Oregon](/source/Domestic_partnership_in_Oregon) (2008) - [Civil union in Rhode Island](/source/Same-sex_marriage_in_Rhode_Island) (2011) - [Domestic partnership in Washington State](/source/Domestic_partnership_in_Washington_State) (2007 – expanded over time) States in the U.S. with domestic partnerships or similar status granting some of the rights of marriage include: - [Designated beneficiary agreement in Colorado](/source/Recognition_of_same-sex_unions_in_Colorado) (2009) - [Reciprocal beneficiary relationship in Hawaii](/source/Reciprocal_beneficiary_relationships_in_Hawaii) (1997) - [Domestic partnership in Maine](/source/Domestic_partnership_in_Maine) (2004) Since October 2014, all states that provide for civil unions, domestic partnerships, or similar arrangements between same-sex partners also allow same-sex partners to legally wed.[204][205] #### Arizona Main article: [Same-sex marriage in Arizona](/source/Same-sex_marriage_in_Arizona) In 2013, [Bisbee](/source/Bisbee%2C_Arizona) became the first city in Arizona to legalize civil unions for same-sex couples.[206] After its passage, the state's Attorney General, [Tom Horne](/source/Tom_Horne), threatened to challenge the law in court, arguing that it violated the state's constitution.[207] However, the Attorney General agreed to withdraw the challenge after Bisbee amended the law, and the civil union ordinance was approved.[208] Following Bisbee, also in 2013, [Tucson](/source/Tucson%2C_Arizona) became the second municipality to legalize civil unions.[209] [Jerome](/source/Jerome%2C_Arizona) followed in the same year.[210] Also in 2013, [Clarkdale](/source/Clarkdale%2C_Arizona) and [Cottonwood](/source/Cottonwood%2C_Arizona) were the next cities in the Verde Valley to pass civil unions.[211][212] A measure to allow civil unions failed in [Camp Verde](/source/Camp_Verde%2C_Arizona) by a split 3–3 vote in the city council making it the only city in the Verde Valley to not have passed the bill.[213] [Sedona](/source/Sedona%2C_Arizona) passed civil unions in September 2013.[214] The city of [Tempe](/source/Tempe%2C_Arizona) considered legal advice about a civil union ordinance, but it did not pass a bill.[215] After the legalization of same-sex marriage in Arizona, civil unions may continue to be registered in the cities that had legalized the ordinances.[216] #### California Main article: [Domestic partnership in California](/source/Domestic_partnership_in_California) In California, where domestic partnership (DP) has been available to same-sex and certain opposite-sex couples since 2000, a wholesale revision of the law in 2005 made it substantially equivalent to marriage at the state level. In 2007, the Legislature took a further step when it required same-sex DP couples to file state income taxes jointly. (Couples must continue to file federal taxes as individuals.) In the May 2008 *[In re Marriage Cases](/source/In_re_Marriage_Cases)* decision, the state supreme court noted nine [differences between Domestic Partnerships and same-sex marriage](/source/Domestic_partnership_in_California#Differences_from_marriage) in state law, including a cohabitation requirement for domestic partners, access to CalPERS long-term care insurance (but not CalPERS in general), and the lack of an equivalent to California's "confidential marriage" institution.[7] The cohabitation requirement was dropped on January 1, 2012, and a "confidential option" for domestic partners became available the same day. #### Colorado Main article: [Recognition of same-sex unions in Colorado](/source/Recognition_of_same-sex_unions_in_Colorado) A bill to establish civil unions for same-sex and opposite-sex couples passed both chambers of the Colorado legislature and was signed into law by Governor [John Hickenlooper](/source/John_Hickenlooper). Civil unions began on May 1, 2013.[217][218][219] #### Connecticut Main article: [Same-sex marriage in Connecticut](/source/Same-sex_marriage_in_Connecticut) In 2005, the [Connecticut General Assembly](/source/Connecticut_General_Assembly) passed a bill to adopt civil unions in Connecticut. Connecticut's civil unions were identical to marriage and provided all of the same rights and responsibilities except for the title. Connecticut was the first state in the U.S. to voluntarily pass a same-sex civil unions law through the legislature without any immediate court intervention.[220] The law was repealed on October 1, 2010, and replaced with a law making marriage gender-neutral. #### Delaware Main article: [Same-sex marriage in Delaware](/source/Same-sex_marriage_in_Delaware) Delaware Governor [Jack Markell](/source/Jack_Markell) signed a civil union bill on May 12, 2011, that establishes civil unions in the state effective January 1, 2012.[221] The law was repealed on July 1, 2014, and replaced with a law making marriage gender-neutral. #### District of Columbia Main article: [Same-sex marriage in the District of Columbia](/source/Same-sex_marriage_in_the_District_of_Columbia) Same-sex marriage in the District of Columbia was legalized on December 18, 2009.[222] Marriage licenses became available on March 3, 2010,[223] and marriages began on March 9, 2010.[224] Legislation on domestic partnerships in the District of Columbia was first passed in 1992, implemented in 2002, and expanded over time up to 2009.[225][226][227] #### Hawaii Main article: [Same-sex marriage in Hawaii](/source/Same-sex_marriage_in_Hawaii) Hawaii legalized civil unions for same-sex and opposite-sex couples on January 1, 2012.[228] Same-sex marriage became legal on December 2, 2013.[229][230] #### Illinois Main article: [Same-sex marriage in Illinois](/source/Same-sex_marriage_in_Illinois) On December 1, 2010, the Illinois state senate passed SB1716 – the "Illinois Religious Freedom Protection and Civil Union Act" – in a 32–24–1 vote, just one day after the Illinois House of Representatives did the same in a 61–52–2 vote. On January 31, 2011, Illinois state Governor Pat Quinn signed SB1716 into law, establishing civil unions for same-sex and opposite-sex couples. The new law came into effect on June 1, 2011. The provision allowing opposite-sex couples to establish a civil union effectively doubles as a tool for widowed seniors to keep [survivor's benefits](/source/Social_Security_(United_States)#Widow(er)_benefits) from a marriage while gaining marital rights at the state level with another partner.[231][232] #### Maine Main article: [Domestic partnership in Maine](/source/Domestic_partnership_in_Maine) Maine legalized domestic partnership for same-sex and opposite-sex couples in 2004.[233][234] Maine's domestic partnership registry only provides limited rights, most of which are aimed at protecting couples' security in emergency situations. #### New Hampshire Main article: [Same-sex marriage in New Hampshire](/source/Same-sex_marriage_in_New_Hampshire) On April 26, 2007, the [New Hampshire General Court](/source/New_Hampshire_General_Court) (state legislature) passed a civil union bill, and Governor [John Lynch](/source/John_H._Lynch) signed the bill into law on May 31, 2007.[235] At the time, New Hampshire was "... the first state to embrace same-sex unions without a court order or the threat of one".[236] The New Hampshire civil union legislation became effective on January 1, 2008.[237] The law was replaced by the same-sex marriage law on January 1, 2010.[238] #### New Jersey Main article: [Same-sex marriage in New Jersey](/source/Same-sex_marriage_in_New_Jersey) On October 25, 2006, the [Supreme Court of New Jersey](/source/Supreme_Court_of_New_Jersey) gave [New Jersey lawmakers](/source/New_Jersey_Legislature) 180 days to rewrite the state's marriage laws, either including same-sex couples or creating a new system of [civil unions](/source/Civil_unions) for them. On December 14 the Legislature passed a bill establishing [civil unions in New Jersey](/source/Same-sex_marriage_in_New_Jersey), which was signed into law by [Governor](/source/Governor_of_New_Jersey) [Jon Corzine](/source/Jon_Corzine) on December 21, 2006. The first civil unions took place on February 19, 2007.[202] There are differences between civil unions and domestic partnerships. In 2004, the state of [New Jersey](/source/New_Jersey) enacted a domestic partnership law, the Domestic Partnership Act, offering certain limited rights and benefits to same-sex and different-sex couples. In 2006, however, after the [state Supreme Court](/source/Supreme_Court_of_New_Jersey)'s [ruling](/source/Lewis_v._Harris) in [*Lewis vs. Harris*](/source/Lewis_v._Harris) that same-sex couples must be extended all the rights and benefits of marriage, the Legislature passed a civil unions law, the Civil Union Act, effective in 2007, which was an attempt to satisfy the court's ruling.[239] #### Nevada Main article: [Same-sex marriage in Nevada](/source/Same-sex_marriage_in_Nevada) On May 31, 2009, the Nevada legislature overrode Governor [Jim Gibbons](/source/Jim_Gibbons_(U.S._politician))' veto of a domestic partnership bill.[240][241][242][243] The bill allows registered domestic partners, whether they are a same-sex or opposite-sex couple, to have most of the state level rights and responsibilities afforded to married couples. It does not require any other entity to provide rights or benefits afforded to married individuals. This has left the partnership bill ineffective compared to those of other states. The law took effect on 1 October 2009. #### Oregon Main article: [Domestic partnership in Oregon](/source/Domestic_partnership_in_Oregon) Since 4 February 2008, Oregon offers domestic partnerships which grant nearly all of the state-recognized rights of marriage to same-sex couples. #### Rhode Island Main article: [Same-sex marriage in Rhode Island](/source/Same-sex_marriage_in_Rhode_Island) Civil unions were permitted in Rhode Island since July 1, 2011 until July 1, 2013. #### Vermont Main article: [Same-sex marriage in Vermont](/source/Same-sex_marriage_in_Vermont) The civil unions law[244] that was passed in the [Vermont General Assembly](/source/Vermont_General_Assembly) in 2000 was a response to the [Vermont Supreme Court](/source/Vermont_Supreme_Court) ruling in *[Baker v. Vermont](/source/Baker_v._Vermont)*, requiring that the state grant same-sex couples the same rights and privileges accorded to married couples under the law. A Vermont civil union is nearly identical to a legal marriage, as far as the rights and responsibilities for which state law, not federal law, is responsible are concerned.[244] It grants partners [next-of-kin](/source/Next-of-kin) rights and other protections that heterosexual married couples also receive. Despite the ["full faith and credit" clause](/source/Full_Faith_and_Credit_clause) of the [United States Constitution](/source/United_States_Constitution), civil unions are generally not recognized outside Vermont in the absence of specific legislation. Opponents of the law have supported the [Defense of Marriage Act](/source/Defense_of_Marriage_Act) and the proposed [Federal Marriage Amendment](/source/Federal_Marriage_Amendment) in order to prevent obligatory recognition of same-sex couples in other jurisdictions. This means that many of the advantages of marriage, which fall in the federal jurisdiction (over 1,100 federal laws, such as joint federal income tax returns, visas and work permits for the foreign partner of a U.S. citizen, etc.), are not extended to the partners of a Vermont civil union. Regarding voluntary recognition of the civil union in other jurisdictions, [New York City](/source/New_York_City)'s Domestic Partnership Law, passed in 2002, recognizes civil unions formalized in other jurisdictions. [Germany](/source/Germany)'s international civil law (EGBGB) also accords to Vermont civil unions the same benefits and responsibilities that apply in Vermont, as long as they do not exceed the standard accorded by German law to a German civil union. The law was replaced by the same-sex marriage law on September 1, 2009. #### Washington Main article: [Domestic partnership in Washington (state)](/source/Domestic_partnership_in_Washington_(state)) Washington offers domestic partnerships which grant nearly all of the state-recognized rights of marriage to same-sex couples. Washington is the first state to have passed a same-sex civil union bill by a popular vote. Washington legalized same-sex marriage early in 2012, which provided that a couple in a civil union would have two years to convert their civil union to a marriage. The law was upheld by popular [referendum](/source/Washington_Referendum_74_(2012)) in November 2012.[245] ### Uruguay Main article: [Same-sex marriage in Uruguay](/source/Same-sex_marriage_in_Uruguay) Civil unions in Uruguay were allowed nationwide from January 2008.[246][247] ## National debates - [Hong Kong](/source/Hong_Kong)[248] - [Peru](/source/Peru)[249] - [Philippines](/source/Philippines)[250] - [Poland](/source/Poland)[251] - [Romania](/source/Romania)[252][253] ## International standards Only two countries (Spain and Portugal) signed onto the [Convention on the Recognition of Registered Partnerships](/source/Convention_on_the_Recognition_of_Registered_Partnerships), a draft multilateral agreement on the status of civil unmarried partnerships on 5 September 2007.[254] The document is inclusive of rights for both same and opposite sex partnerships.[255] ## See also - [Civil marriage](/source/Civil_marriage) - [Cohabitation agreement](/source/Cohabitation_agreement) - [Common-law marriage](/source/Common-law_marriage) - [Convention on the Recognition of Registered Partnerships](/source/Convention_on_the_Recognition_of_Registered_Partnerships) - [Domestic partnership](/source/Domestic_partnership) - [Free union](/source/Free_union) - [LGBT rights](/source/LGBT_rights) - [Marriage privatization](/source/Marriage_privatization) - [Nyumba ntobhu](/source/Nyumba_ntobhu) ## References 1. **[^](#cite_ref-Towleroad_15-0)** [NYC Protest and Civil Rights March Opposing Proposition 8](http://www.towleroad.com/2008/11/we-did-it.html) [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20090213224331/http://www.towleroad.com/2008/11/we-did-it.html) 2009-02-13 at the [Wayback Machine](/source/Wayback_Machine), [Andy Towle](/source/Andy_Towle), Towelroad.com, November 13, 2008; accessed November 14, 2008. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-16)** Halloran, Liz (March 23, 2013). ["How Vermont's 'Civil' War Fueled The Gay Marriage Movement"](https://www.npr.org/2013/03/27/174651233/how-vermonts-civil-war-fueled-the-gay-marriage-movement). *NPR*. National Public Radio. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20210709183546/https://www.npr.org/2013/03/27/174651233/how-vermonts-civil-war-fueled-the-gay-marriage-movement) from the original on July 9, 2021. Retrieved July 6, 2021. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-buddy062907_17-0)** ["Governments Offering Benefits"](http://www.buddybuddy.com/d-p-gov.html). Partners Task Force for Gay & Lesbian Couples. 2007-06-29. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20070807213457/http://www.buddybuddy.com/d-p-gov.html) from the original on 2007-08-07. Retrieved 2007-07-31. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-18)** ["Marriage, Domestic Partnerships, and Civil Unions: An Overview of Relationship Recognition for Same-Sex Couples in the United States"](https://web.archive.org/web/20081203035743/http://www.nclrights.org/site/DocServer/Relationship_Recognition_Update_-_09_03_08.pdf) (PDF). Archived from [the original](http://www.nclrights.org/site/DocServer/Relationship_Recognition_Update_-_09_03_08.pdf) (PDF) on December 3, 2008. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-19)** [Interview with Evan Wolfson](https://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Interview_with_gay_marriage_movement_founder_Evan_Wolfson), David Shankbone, September 30, 2007 1. **[^](#cite_ref-bushirks_20-0)** ["Bush's gay union stance irks conservatives"](https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna6338458). *[NBC News](/source/NBC_News)*. 26 October 2004. 1. ^ [***a***](#cite_ref-irmf24_21-0) [***b***](#cite_ref-irmf24_21-1) [In Re Marriage Cases](http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/californiastatecases/s147999.pdf) [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20110810011136/http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/californiastatecases/S147999.PDF) 2011-08-10 at the [Wayback Machine](/source/Wayback_Machine), California Supreme Court Decision, footnote 24, pages 42–44. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-22)** ["Civil Unions "Anathema" to Marilyn Waring"](http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO0410/S00234.htm). *Scoop*. October 23, 2004. Retrieved June 12, 2010.{{[cite web](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Cite_web)}}: CS1 maint: deprecated archival service ([link](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:CS1_maint:_deprecated_archival_service)) 1. ^ [***a***](#cite_ref-hammond2009_23-0) [***b***](#cite_ref-hammond2009_23-1) Hammond, Bill (April 20, 2009). ["Marriage is more perfect union: In gay marriage debate, separate but equal won't cut it"](https://web.archive.org/web/20110925080454/http://www.nydailynews.com/opinions/2009/04/21/2009-04-21_why_civil_unions_arent_enough_in_gay_marriage_debate_separate_but_equal_wont_cut.html). *Ny Daily News*. New York. Archived from [the original](http://www.nydailynews.com/opinions/2009/04/21/2009-04-21_why_civil_unions_arent_enough_in_gay_marriage_debate_separate_but_equal_wont_cut.html) on September 25, 2011. Retrieved June 12, 2010. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-24)** Swayne, Steven (February 28, 2004). ["The Case for Federal Civil Unions"](https://web.archive.org/web/20100613050003/http://indegayforum.org/news/show/26950.html). *Independent Gay Forum*. Archived from [the original](http://www.indegayforum.org/news/show/26950.html) on June 13, 2010. Retrieved June 12, 2010. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-25)** ["Obama: Sermon on the Mount supports gay civil unions"](https://web.archive.org/web/20110425083108/http://www.bpnews.net/BPnews.asp?ID=27532). *Baptist Press*. Archived from [the original](http://www.bpnews.net/BPnews.asp?ID=27532) on 2011-04-25. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-26)** Sullivan, Andrew (February 8, 2004). ["Why The M Word Matters To Me"](https://web.archive.org/web/20050306023600/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1101040216-588877,00.html). *Time*. Archived from [the original](http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1101040216-588877,00.html) on March 6, 2005. Retrieved June 12, 2010. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-27)** ["Text of Ted Olson's Opening Statement in Prop. 8 Trial – As Prepared"](http://www.equalrightsfoundation.org/news/text-of-ted-olsons-opening-statement-in-prop-8-trial-as-prepared/). *Equal Rights Foundation*. January 11, 2010. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20100530234235/http://www.equalrightsfoundation.org/news/text-of-ted-olsons-opening-statement-in-prop-8-trial-as-prepared/) from the original on May 30, 2010. Retrieved June 12, 2010. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-28)** Kitch, Mary (April 21, 2009). ["Why the word "marriage" matters"](http://www.oregonlive.com/opinion/index.ssf/2009/04/why_the_word_marriage_matters.html). *Oregon Live*. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20171208003202/http://www.oregonlive.com/opinion/index.ssf/2009/04/why_the_word_marriage_matters.html) from the original on December 8, 2017. Retrieved June 12, 2010. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-29)** ["Information for couples marrying outside the Rabbinate"](https://rackmancenter.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Marriage-Outside-the-Rabbinate-Halperin-Kaddari-et-al-Rackman-Study-2018.pdf) (PDF). *Rackman Center*. 2018. Retrieved November 10, 2023. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-30)** ["Civil Union Act, 2006"](https://web.archive.org/web/20090626055512/http://www.info.gov.za/view/DownloadFileAction?id=67843). *[Government Gazette of South Africa](/source/Government_Gazette_of_South_Africa)*. **497** (29441). [South Africa government](/source/South_Africa_government): 2–12. 17 November 2006. Archived from [the original](http://www.info.gov.za/view/DownloadFileAction?id=67843) on 26 June 2009. Retrieved 21 August 2019. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-31)** Flores, S-COM: Davinsson Nunjar. ["Sistema Costarricense de Información Jurídica"](https://web.archive.org/web/20150924072155/http://www.pgrweb.go.cr/scij/Busqueda/Normativa/Normas/nrm_texto_completo.aspx?param1=NRTC&nValor1=1&nValor2=22272&nValor3=23625&strTipM=TC). Archived from [the original](http://www.pgrweb.go.cr/scij/Busqueda/Normativa/Normas/nrm_texto_completo.aspx?param1=NRTC&nValor1=1&nValor2=22272&nValor3=23625&strTipM=TC) on 2015-09-24. Retrieved 2015-09-01. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-32)** ["NYC Passes Domestic Partnership Law"](http://www.columbia.edu/cu/gables/dpinfo_nyc/espa_pressrelease_1998-07-08.html). [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20220408014212/http://www.columbia.edu/cu/gables/dpinfo_nyc/espa_pressrelease_1998-07-08.html) from the original on 2022-04-08. Retrieved 2013-06-14. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-33)** Migden. ["AB 26 Assembly Bill - CHAPTERED"](http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/99-00/bill/asm/ab_0001-0050/ab_26_bill_19991010_chaptered.html). [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20230404204113/http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/99-00/bill/asm/ab_0001-0050/ab_26_bill_19991010_chaptered.html) from the original on 2023-04-04. Retrieved 2013-06-14. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-34)** ["HRC Talking Points on DC Domestic Partnership Program"](http://www.glaa.org/archive/2001/dpfactsheet103001.shtml). [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20110716113648/http://www.glaa.org/archive/2001/dpfactsheet103001.shtml) from the original on 2011-07-16. Retrieved 2013-06-14. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-35)** ["Public Laws of 2003 as Passed at 2nd Special Sess. of 121st Legislature"](http://www.mainelegislature.org/ros/LOM/lom121st/15pub651-700/pub651-700-32.htm). [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20230404204112/http://www.mainelegislature.org/ros/LOM/lom121st/15pub651-700/pub651-700-32.htm) from the original on 2023-04-04. Retrieved 2013-06-14. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-36)** Vanarelli, Donald D. ["New Jersey Domestic Partnership Act"](https://web.archive.org/web/20081120042722/http://www.dvanarelli.com/article-new-jersey-domestic-partnership-act.html). *Law Office of Donald D Vanarelli*. Archived from [the original](http://www.dvanarelli.com/article-new-jersey-domestic-partnership-act.html) on November 20, 2008. Retrieved October 17, 2025. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-37)** ["Washington State Legislature"](http://apps.leg.wa.gov/billinfo/summary.aspx?bill=5336&year=2007). [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20110721073318/http://apps.leg.wa.gov/billinfo/summary.aspx?bill=5336&year=2007) from the original on 2011-07-21. Retrieved 2013-06-14. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-38)** ["HOUSE BILL 09-1260"](http://www.leg.state.co.us/clics/clics2009a/csl.nsf/fsbillcont3/7B41525D3772D99987257547006300AE?open&file=1260_enr.pdf) (PDF). [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20220403154632/http://www.leg.state.co.us/clics/clics2009a/csl.nsf/fsbillcont3/7B41525D3772D99987257547006300AE?open&file=1260_enr.pdf) (PDF) from the original on 2022-04-03. Retrieved 2013-06-14. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-39)** ["Domestic Partnerships in Nevada"](https://web.archive.org/web/20160811141058/http://www.aclunv.org/category/issue/lgbt/domestic-partnership-guide). 5 March 2010. Archived from [the original](http://www.aclunv.org/category/issue/lgbt/domestic-partnership-guide) on 11 August 2016. Retrieved 14 June 2013. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-40)** ["Law Reform (2000) Act"](http://nslegislature.ca/legc/bills/58th_1st/3rd_read/b075.htm). 27 November 2017. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20190502181916/https://nslegislature.ca/legc/bills/58th_1st/3rd_read/b075.htm) from the original on 2 May 2019. Retrieved 14 June 2013. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-41)** ["Civil Unions"](https://web.archive.org/web/20150627081218/http://www.justice.gouv.qc.ca/english/publications/generale/union-civ-a.htm). Archived from [the original](http://www.justice.gouv.qc.ca/english/publications/generale/union-civ-a.htm) on 2015-06-27. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-42)** ["Adult Interdependent Relationships Act, SA 2002"](https://web.archive.org/web/20151017044950/http://www.canlii.org/en/ab/laws/stat/sa-2002-c-a-4.5/latest/sa-2002-c-a-4.5.html). Archived from [the original](http://www.canlii.org/en/ab/laws/stat/sa-2002-c-a-4.5/latest/sa-2002-c-a-4.5.html) on October 17, 2015. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-43)** ["Province of Manitoba - Manitoba Justice - Family Law - Family Law in Manitoba"](https://web.archive.org/web/20070930171016/http://www.gov.mb.ca/justice/family/englishbooklet/chapter3.html#5). 30 September 2007. Archived from [the original](https://www.gov.mb.ca/justice/family/englishbooklet/chapter3.html#5#5) on 30 September 2007. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-44)** ["Mexican state approves gay civil unions"](https://web.archive.org/web/20230406040905/https://mg.co.za/article/2007-01-13-mexican-state-approves-gay-civil-unions/). 13 January 2007. Archived from [the original](https://mg.co.za/article/2007-01-13-mexican-state-approves-gay-civil-unions) on April 6, 2023. Retrieved October 16, 2025. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-45)** ["Legalizan bodas gays en Campeche"](https://web.archive.org/web/20140222202643/http://www.sdpnoticias.com/gay/2013/12/23/legalizan-bodas-gays-en-campeche). 23 December 2013. Archived from [the original](http://www.sdpnoticias.com/gay/2013/12/23/legalizan-bodas-gays-en-campeche) on 22 February 2014. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-46)** ["Ley Nş 18.246 UNIÓN CONCUBINARIA"](https://web.archive.org/web/20100702194538/http://www.parlamento.gub.uy/leyes/AccesoTextoLey.asp?Ley=18246). Archived from [the original](https://www0.parlamento.gub.uy/leyes/AccesoTextoLey.asp?Ley=18246) on 2010-07-02. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-47)** Partlow, Joshua; Küffner, Stephan (29 September 2008). ["Voters in Ecuador Approve Constitution"](https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/28/AR2008092802644.html). *[The Washington Post](/source/The_Washington_Post)*. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20181116002701/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/28/AR2008092802644.html) from the original on 16 November 2018. Retrieved 25 August 2017. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-48)** ["Decision C-029 of 2009"](http://english.corteconstitucional.gov.co/sentences/C-029-2009.pdf) (PDF). [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20120505223323/http://english.corteconstitucional.gov.co/sentences/C-029-2009.pdf) (PDF) from the original on 2012-05-05. Retrieved 2013-06-14. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-49)** ["Brazil supreme court recognizes same-sex civil unions"](https://jurist.org/paperchase/2011/05/brazil-supreme-court-recognizes-same-sex-civil-unions.php). *Jurist*. 6 May 2011. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20170811055454/http://www.jurist.org/paperchase/2011/05/brazil-supreme-court-recognizes-same-sex-civil-unions.php) from the original on 11 August 2017. Retrieved 14 June 2013. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-50)** ["Aruba staat partnerregistratie homo's toe"](https://nos.nl/artikel/2130962-aruba-staat-partnerregistratie-homo-s-toe.html). 9 September 2016. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20230405193210/https://nos.nl/artikel/2130962-aruba-staat-partnerregistratie-homo-s-toe.html) from the original on 5 April 2023. Retrieved 2 January 2017. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-51)** ["InfoLEG - Ministerio de Economía y Finanzas Públicas - Argentina"](https://web.archive.org/web/20190223022635/http://servicios.infoleg.gob.ar/infolegInternet/anexos/235000-239999/235975/norma.htm). *servicios.infoleg.gob.ar*. Archived from [the original](http://servicios.infoleg.gob.ar/infolegInternet/anexos/235000-239999/235975/norma.htm) on 2019-02-23. Retrieved 2019-02-19. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-52)** ["Buenos Aires Herald"](https://web.archive.org/web/20070928135630/http://www.buenosairesherald.com/argentina/note.jsp?idContent=1031&Key=ARGENTINA). 28 September 2007. Archived from [the original](http://www.buenosairesherald.com/argentina/note.jsp?idContent=1031&Key=ARGENTINA) on 28 September 2007. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-53)** ["En 5 años, sólo 10 parejas gays pasaron por el Registro Civil"](https://web.archive.org/web/20130926022134/http://www1.rionegro.com.ar/diario/2008/02/03/20082v03s01.php). *www1.rionegro.com.ar*. Archived from [the original](http://www1.rionegro.com.ar/diario/2008/02/03/20082v03s01.php) on September 26, 2013. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-54)** ["Córdoba: aprueban la unión civil entre homosexuales en Villa Carlos Paz"](https://web.archive.org/web/20131003180409/http://edant.clarin.com/diario/2007/11/23/um/m-01547228.htm). Archived from [the original](http://edant.clarin.com/diario/2007/11/23/um/m-01547228.htm) on 2013-10-03. Retrieved 2013-06-14. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-55)** ["LAVOZ.com.ar | Río Cuarto: aprueban la unión civil de parejas gays"](https://web.archive.org/web/20130927175710/http://archivo.lavoz.com.ar/09/05/07/Rio-Cuarto-aprueban-union-civil-parejas-gays.html). *archivo.lavoz.com.ar*. Archived from [the original](http://archivo.lavoz.com.ar/09/05/07/Rio-Cuarto-aprueban-union-civil-parejas-gays.html) on September 27, 2013. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-56)** ["LEY-20830 21-ABR-2015 MINISTERIO SECRETARIA GENERAL DE GOBIERNO - Ley Chile - Biblioteca del Congreso Nacional"](http://www.leychile.cl/Navegar?idNorma=1075210). [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20160104161110/http://www.leychile.cl/Navegar?idNorma=1075210) from the original on 2016-01-04. Retrieved 2015-09-01. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-57)** ["Marriage Ordinance 1996"](https://www.legislation.gov.fk/view/html/inforce/2018-06-04/fiord-1996-10#pt.iva). *Falkland Islands Legislation*. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20210923181018/https://www.legislation.gov.fk/view/html/inforce/2018-06-04/fiord-1996-10#pt.iva) from the original on 2021-09-23. Retrieved 4 June 2018. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-58)** ["Domestic Partnership Act 2018"](https://web.archive.org/web/20180709153712/http://www.bermudalaws.bm/laws/Annual%20Laws/2018/Acts/Domestic%20Partnership%20Act%202018.pdf) (PDF). Bermuda. Archived from [the original](http://www.bermudalaws.bm/laws/Annual%20Laws/2018/Acts/Domestic%20Partnership%20Act%202018.pdf) (PDF) on 9 July 2018. Retrieved October 17, 2025. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-59)** ["Civil Partnerships"](https://web.archive.org/web/20250805034940/https://www.ciregistry.ky/civil-partnerships/). *Cayman Islands General Registry*. Archived from [the original](https://www.ciregistry.ky/civil-partnerships/) on August 5, 2025. Retrieved October 17, 2025. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-60)** ["Trouwen, samenlevingscontract en geregistreerd partnerschap - Onderwerp - Rijksoverheid.nl"](http://www.rijksoverheid.nl/onderwerpen/trouwen-samenlevingscontract-en-geregistreerd-partnerschap). 23 March 2018. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20230520133011/https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/onderwerpen/trouwen-samenlevingscontract-en-geregistreerd-partnerschap) from the original on 20 May 2023. Retrieved 14 June 2013. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-61)** ["LLEI 10/1998, de 15 de juliol, d'unions estables de parella (DOGC núm. 2687, de 23.07.1998)"](https://web.archive.org/web/20120413182830/http://www20.gencat.cat/docs/governacio/Funcio%20Publica/Documents/Normativa/Arxius/lle10-98.pdf) (PDF). Archived from [the original](http://www20.gencat.cat/docs/governacio/Funcio%20Publica/Documents/Normativa/Arxius/lle10-98.pdf) (PDF) on April 13, 2012. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-62)** ["Ley 6/1999, de 26 de marzo, relativa a Parejas estables no casadas (Vigente hasta el 23 de Abril de 2011)"](http://noticias.juridicas.com/base_datos/CCAA/ar-l6-1999.html). *Noticias Jurídicas*. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20190219184220/http://noticias.juridicas.com/base_datos/CCAA/ar-l6-1999.html) from the original on 2019-02-19. Retrieved 2019-02-19. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-63)** ["Decreto Legislativo 1/2011, de 22 de marzo, del Gobierno de Aragón, por el que se aprueba, con el título de "Código del Derecho Foral de Aragón", el Texto Refundido de las Leyes civiles aragonesas. TÍTULO VI. De las parejas estables no casadas"](https://noticias.juridicas.com/base_datos/CCAA/ar-dleg1-2011.l2t6.html). *Noticias Jurídicas*. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20221030171738/https://noticias.juridicas.com/base_datos/CCAA/ar-dleg1-2011.l2t6.html) from the original on 2022-10-30. Retrieved 2015-05-10. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-64)** ["Decreto 124/2000, de 11 de julio, por el que se regula la creación y el régimen de funcionamiento del Registro de parejas de hecho de la comunidad autónoma de Castilla-La Mancha"](https://noticias.juridicas.com/base_datos/CCAA/cm-d124-2000.html). *Noticias Jurídicas*. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20221206111629/https://noticias.juridicas.com/base_datos/CCAA/cm-d124-2000.html) from the original on 2022-12-06. Retrieved 2015-05-10. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-65)** ["Lexnavarra"](http://www.lexnavarra.navarra.es/detalle.asp?r=1278). *www.lexnavarra.navarra.es*. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20230605232424/http://www.lexnavarra.navarra.es/detalle.asp?r=1278) from the original on 2023-06-05. Retrieved 2013-06-14. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-66)** ["Ley 5/2012, de 15 de octubre, de Uniones de Hecho Formalizadas de la Comunitat Valenciana"](https://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2012/11/07/pdfs/BOE-A-2012-13776.pdf) (PDF). [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20221030171737/https://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2012/11/07/pdfs/BOE-A-2012-13776.pdf) (PDF) from the original on 2022-10-30. Retrieved 2013-06-14. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-67)** ["Ley 18/2001, de 19 de diciembre, de parejas estables"](https://noticias.juridicas.com/base_datos/CCAA/ib-l18-2001.html). *Noticias Jurídicas*. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20221030171740/https://noticias.juridicas.com/base_datos/CCAA/ib-l18-2001.html) from the original on 2022-10-30. Retrieved 2015-05-10. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-68)** ["LEY 5/2002, de 16 de diciembre, de Parejas de Hecho"](https://web.archive.org/web/20120816122757/http://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2003/01/13/pdfs/A01358-01361.pdf) (PDF). Archived from [the original](http://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2003/01/13/pdfs/A01358-01361.pdf) (PDF) on August 16, 2012. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-69)** ["LEY 4/2002, de 23 de mayo, de Parejas Estables"](https://web.archive.org/web/20160304100424/http://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2002/07/02/pdfs/A23974-23975.pdf) (PDF). Archived from [the original](http://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2002/07/02/pdfs/A23974-23975.pdf) (PDF) on March 4, 2016. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-70)** ["Comunidad de Madrid - madrid.org"](https://web.archive.org/web/20201207121549/http://www.madrid.org/wleg_pub/secure/normativas/contenidoNormativa.jsf?opcion=VerHtml&nmnorma=480&cdestado=P). *www.madrid.org*. Archived from [the original](http://www.madrid.org/wleg_pub/secure/normativas/contenidoNormativa.jsf?opcion=VerHtml&nmnorma=480&cdestado=P) on 2020-12-07. Retrieved 2020-10-01. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-71)** ["Comunidad de Madrid - madrid.org"](https://web.archive.org/web/20210308135836/http://www.madrid.org/wleg_pub/secure/normativas/contenidoNormativa.jsf?opcion=VerHtml&nmnorma=3095&cdestado=P). *www.madrid.org*. Archived from [the original](http://www.madrid.org/wleg_pub/secure/normativas/contenidoNormativa.jsf?opcion=VerHtml&nmnorma=3095&cdestado=P) on 2021-03-08. Retrieved 2020-10-01. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-72)** ["DECRETO 117/2002, de 24 de octubre, por el que se crea el Registro de Uniones de Hecho en Castilla y León y se regula su funcionamiento"](http://www.jcyl.es/web/jcyl/binarios/509/669/Decreto%20117%202002.pdf?blobheader=application%2Fpdf%3Bcharset%3DUTF-8&blobheadername1=Cache-Control&blobheadername2=Expires&blobheadername3=Site&blobheadervalue1=no-store%2Cno-cache%2Cmust-revalidate&blobheadervalue2=0&blobheadervalue3=JCYL_Familia&blobnocache=true) (PDF). [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20190502050958/http://www.jcyl.es/web/jcyl/binarios/509/669/Decreto) from the original on 2019-05-02. Retrieved 2015-05-10. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-73)** ["Ley 5/2003, de 20 de marzo, de Parejas de Hecho de la Comunidad Autónoma de Extremadura"](https://noticias.juridicas.com/base_datos/CCAA/ex-l5-2003.html). *Noticias Jurídicas*. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20221030171741/https://noticias.juridicas.com/base_datos/CCAA/ex-l5-2003.html) from the original on 2022-10-30. Retrieved 2013-06-14. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-74)** ["Ley 2/2003, de 7 de mayo, reguladora de las parejas de hecho"](https://noticias.juridicas.com/base_datos/CCAA/pv-l2-2003.html). *Noticias Jurídicas*. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20221030171737/https://noticias.juridicas.com/base_datos/CCAA/pv-l2-2003.html) from the original on 2022-10-30. Retrieved 2013-06-14. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-75)** ["Ley de la C.A. de Cantabria 1/2005, de 16 de mayo, de parejas de hecho de la Comunidad Autónoma de Cantabria"](https://web.archive.org/web/20121118154119/http://www.lexureditorial.com/boe/0506/09402.htm). Archived from [the original](http://www.lexureditorial.com/boe/0506/09402.htm) on November 18, 2012. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-76)** ["Ley 10/2007, de 28 de junio, de reforma de la disposición adicional tercera de la Ley 2/2006, de 14 de junio, de derecho civil de Galicia"](https://noticias.juridicas.com/base_datos/CCAA/ga-l10-2007.html). *Noticias Jurídicas*. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20221030171733/https://noticias.juridicas.com/base_datos/CCAA/ga-l10-2007.html) from the original on 2022-10-30. Retrieved 2015-05-10. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-77)** ["Decreto 248/2007, de 20 de diciembre, por el que se crea y se regula el Registro de Parejas de Hecho de Galicia. TÍTULO II. Organización y funcionamiento del Registro de Parejas de Hecho de Galicia"](https://noticias.juridicas.com/base_datos/CCAA/ga-d248-2007.t2.html). *Noticias Jurídicas*. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20221030171734/https://noticias.juridicas.com/base_datos/CCAA/ga-d248-2007.t2.html) from the original on 2022-10-30. Retrieved 2015-05-10. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-78)** ["Civil partnership or matrimony in Spain"](https://web.archive.org/web/20240226185142/https://spainresidency.com/blogs/civil-partnership-or-matrimony-in-spain/). *Spain Residency*. Archived from [the original](https://spainresidency.com/blogs/civil-partnership-or-matrimony-in-spain/) on February 26, 2024. Retrieved October 17, 2025. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-79)** ["BOE.es - Documento BOE-A-2018-10759"](https://www.boe.es/diario_boe/txt.php?id=BOE-A-2018-10759). *www.boe.es*. pp. 76345–76350. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20180825212613/https://www.boe.es/diario_boe/txt.php?id=BOE-A-2018-10759) from the original on 2018-08-25. Retrieved 2019-02-06. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-France_80-0)** ["Chapitre Ier : Du pacte civil de solidarité"](http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichCode.do?idSectionTA=LEGISCTA000006136536&cidTexte=LEGITEXT000006070721). *[Legifrance](/source/Legifrance)* (in French). [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20200801002503/https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichCode.do?idSectionTA=LEGISCTA000006136536&cidTexte=LEGITEXT000006070721) from the original on 1 August 2020. Retrieved 21 August 2019. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-81)** ["Cohabitation légale — Uccle Ukkel"](http://www.uccle.be/fr/services-communaux/etat-civil/cohabitation-legale). Retrieved 2013-06-14.{{[cite web](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Cite_web)}}: CS1 maint: deprecated archival service ([link](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:CS1_maint:_deprecated_archival_service)) 1. **[^](#cite_ref-82)** ["Lei n.º 7/2001, de 11 de Maio. Protecção das uniões de facto"](http://www.pgdlisboa.pt/leis/lei_mostra_articulado.php?nid=901&tabela=leis). 1. **[^](#cite_ref-83)** ["Déclarer un partenariat (PACS) - Citoyens // Luxembourg"](http://www.guichet.public.lu/citoyens/fr/famille/vie-maritale/partenariat-pacs/declaration-partenariat/). [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20171223211841/http://www.guichet.public.lu/citoyens/fr/famille/vie-maritale/partenariat-pacs/declaration-partenariat/) from the original on 2017-12-23. Retrieved 2013-06-14. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-84)** ["Expedient previ al registre d'unions estables de parella"](http://www.registrecivil.ad/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=105&Itemid=597). Registrecivil.ad. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20140116194140/http://www.registrecivil.ad/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=105&Itemid=597) from the original on 2014-01-16. Retrieved 2014-04-05. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-85)** ["Civil Partnership Act 2004"](https://web.archive.org/web/20150905205257/http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/33/contents/data.htm). *UK Legislation*. Archived from [the original](http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/33/contents/data.htm) on September 5, 2015. Retrieved October 17, 2025. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-86)** ["CIVIL PARTNERSHIP ACT 2011"](https://web.archive.org/web/20160304101027/http://www.legislation.gov.im/cms/images/LEGISLATION/PRINCIPAL/2011/2011-0002/CivilPartnershipAct2011_1.pdf) (PDF). Archived from [the original](http://www.legislation.gov.im/cms/images/LEGISLATION/PRINCIPAL/2011/2011-0002/CivilPartnershipAct2011_1.pdf) (PDF) on 2016-03-04. Retrieved 2013-06-14. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-87)** ["Civil Partnership (Jersey) Law 2012"](https://web.archive.org/web/20150906190642/http://www.jerseylaw.je/Law/display.aspx?url=lawsinforce%5Chtm%5CLawFiles%5C2012%2FL-04-2012.htm). Archived from [the original](https://www.jerseylaw.je/Law/display.aspx?url=lawsinforce\htm\LawFiles12%2fL-04-2012.htm) on September 6, 2015. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-88)** ["CIVIL PARTNERSHIP ACT 2014"](https://web.archive.org/web/20140407091751/http://www.gibraltarlaws.gov.gi/articles/2014-10o.pdf) (PDF). Archived from [the original](http://www.gibraltarlaws.gov.gi/articles/2014-10o.pdf) (PDF) on 2014-04-07. Retrieved 2014-04-01. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-89)** ["Uzavření registrovaného partnerství"](https://web.archive.org/web/20140116204551/http://www.mvcr.cz/clanek/registrovane-partnerstvi.aspx). Archived from [the original](http://www.mvcr.cz/clanek/registrovane-partnerstvi.aspx) on January 16, 2014. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-90)** Kft., Wolters Kluwer. ["2009. évi XXIX. törvény - a bejegyzett élettársi kapcsolatról, az ezzel összefüggő, valamint az élettársi viszony igazolásának megkönnyítéséhez szükséges egyes törvények módosításáról"](http://net.jogtar.hu/jr/gen/hjegy_doc.cgi?docid=A0900029.TV). [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20151222130206/http://net.jogtar.hu/jr/gen/hjegy_doc.cgi?docid=A0900029.TV) from the original on 2015-12-22. Retrieved 2013-06-14. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-91)** ["485 d.B. (XXIV. GP) - Eingetragene Partnerschaft-Gesetz - EPG"](https://www.parlament.gv.at/PAKT/VHG/XXIV/I/I_00485/index.shtml). [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20221206111619/https://www.parlament.gv.at/PAKT/VHG/XXIV/I/I_00485/index.shtml) from the original on 2022-12-06. Retrieved 2013-06-14. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-92)** ["LLV"](https://web.archive.org/web/20131113165205/http://www.llv.li/llv-apa-aufenthaltsbewilligung-lebenspartner-2). *www.llv.li*. Archived from [the original](https://www.llv.li/) on November 13, 2013. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-93)** ["View Document"](https://legislation.mt/eli/act/2014/9/eng/pdf). *legislation.mt*. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20181001160734/http://www.justiceservices.gov.mt/DownloadDocument.aspx?app=lp&itemid=26024&l=1) from the original on 2018-10-01. Retrieved 2020-10-01. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-94)** ["POVIJESNA ODLUKA U SABORU Istospolni će parovi od rujna imatiista prava kao i bračni partneri"](https://web.archive.org/web/20160303220721/http://www.jutarnji.hr/usvojen-zakon-o-zivotnom-partnerstvu--prva-istospolna-vjencanja-sredinom-kolovoza-/1206537/). Archived from [the original](http://www.jutarnji.hr/usvojen-zakon-o-zivotnom-partnerstvu--prva-istospolna-vjencanja-sredinom-kolovoza-/1206537/) on 2016-03-03. Retrieved 2014-07-15. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-95)** ["ΕΦΗΜΕΡΙΔΑ ΤΗΣ ΚΥΒΕΡΝΗΣΕΩΣ"](https://web.archive.org/web/20151013032607/http://www.dsanet.gr/Epikairothta/Nomothesia/n3719_08.htm). *www.dsanet.gr*. Archived from [the original](http://www.dsanet.gr/Epikairothta/Nomothesia/n3719_08.htm) on October 13, 2015. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-96)** ["Greece to legally recognize same-sex couples for the first time"](https://web.archive.org/web/20151223140505/http://www.gaystarnews.com/article/greece-to-legally-recognize-same-sex-couples-for-the-first-time/#gs.ZIoAi3s). 23 December 2015. Archived from [the original](http://www.gaystarnews.com/article/greece-to-legally-recognize-same-sex-couples-for-the-first-time/#gs.ZIoAi3s) on 23 December 2015. Retrieved 23 December 2015. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-97)** ["Parliament Passes Cohabitation Act; President Proclaims It"](https://web.archive.org/web/20151130003705/http://news.err.ee/v/main_news/f238f529-5b94-4f66-b7be-ad5d21566cc5). Archived from [the original](http://news.err.ee/v/main_news/f238f529-5b94-4f66-b7be-ad5d21566cc5) on 2015-11-30. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-98)** ["Italian MPs back same-sex unions in vote for Renzi"](https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-36269605). *BBC News*. 11 May 2016. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20180928024728/https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-36269605) from the original on 28 September 2018. Retrieved 20 June 2018. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-99)** ["LEGGE 20 novembre 2018 n.147 - Regolamentazione delle unioni civili - Consiglio Grande e Generale"](https://www.consigliograndeegenerale.sm/on-line/home/scheda17160637.html). *www.consigliograndeegenerale.sm*. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20190327090732/https://www.consigliograndeegenerale.sm/on-line/home/scheda17160637.html) from the original on 2019-03-27. Retrieved 2020-03-11. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-100)** ["N° 1481 - Loi du 17 décembre 2019 relative aux contrats civils de solidarité"](https://web.archive.org/web/20200102220950/http://www.conseil-national.mc/index.php/textes-et-lois/lois/item/644-n-1481-loi-du-17-decembre-2019-relative-aux-contrats-civils-de-solidarite). Archived from [the original](http://www.conseil-national.mc/index.php/textes-et-lois/lois/item/644-n-1481-loi-du-17-decembre-2019-relative-aux-contrats-civils-de-solidarite) on 2020-01-02. Retrieved 2020-03-11. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-101)** Savage, Rachel (July 1, 2020). ["Montenegro legalises same-sex civil partnerships"](https://www.reuters.com/article/us-montenegro-lgbt-lawmaking-trfn-idUSKBN24271A). *[Reuters](/source/Reuters)*. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20210427201940/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-montenegro-lgbt-lawmaking-trfn-idUSKBN24271A) from the original on April 27, 2021. Retrieved October 1, 2020. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-102)** ["Court recognizes another same-sex couple as legitimate family"](https://www.baltictimes.com/court_recognizes_another_same-sex_couple_as_legitimate_family/). *Baltic Times*. 8 July 2022. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20230320192644/https://www.baltictimes.com/court_recognizes_another_same-sex_couple_as_legitimate_family/) from the original on 20 March 2023. Retrieved 15 August 2022. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-103)** ["Absence of same-sex partnerships in Lithuania 'unconstitutional', rules court"](https://www.lrt.lt/en/news-in-english/19/2539322/absence-of-same-sex-partnerships-in-lithuania-unconstitutional-rules-court/). *LRT*. 17 April 2025. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-104)** ["Legislation View Page"](http://www.thelaw.tas.gov.au/tocview/index.w3p;cond=;doc_id=44++2003+AT@EN+20061223000000;histon=;prompt=;rec=;term=). [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20160304200421/http://www.thelaw.tas.gov.au/tocview/index.w3p;cond=;doc_id=44++2003+AT@EN+20061223000000;histon=;prompt=;rec=;term=) from the original on 2016-03-04. Retrieved 2017-01-08. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-105)** ["South Australia gays get new rights"](http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2006/12/06/south-australia-gays-get-new-rights/). 6 December 2006. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20220405035609/https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2006/12/06/south-australia-gays-get-new-rights/) from the original on 5 April 2022. Retrieved 21 April 2014. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-106)** government, Australian Capital Territory. ["ACT legislation register - Civil Partnerships Act 2008 (repealed) - main page"](https://www.legislation.act.gov.au/a/2008-14/default.asp). [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20190305073518/https://www.legislation.act.gov.au/a/2008-14/default.asp) from the original on 2019-03-05. Retrieved 2013-06-14. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-107)** ["Relationships Act 2008"](http://www.legislation.vic.gov.au/Domino/Web_Notes/LDMS/PubStatbook.nsf/f932b66241ecf1b7ca256e92000e23be/A7417CE604D359DECA25742C0022EC95/$FILE/08-012a.pdf) (PDF). [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20190326143720/http://www.legislation.vic.gov.au/Domino/Web_Notes/LDMS/PubStatbook.nsf/f932b66241ecf1b7ca256e92000e23be/A7417CE604D359DECA25742C0022EC95/$FILE/08-012a.pdf) (PDF) from the original on 2019-03-26. Retrieved 2013-06-14. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-108)** ["Relationships Register Act 2010"](https://web.archive.org/web/20200731204601/https://www.legislation.nsw.gov.au/fullhtml/inforce/act+19+2010+cd+0+N). Archived from [the original](http://www.legislation.nsw.gov.au/fullhtml/inforce/act+19+2010+cd+0+N) on 2020-07-31. Retrieved 2013-06-14. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-109)** ["Acts as passed - Queensland Legislation - Queensland Government"](https://www.legislation.qld.gov.au/browse/aspassed). *www.legislation.qld.gov.au*. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20170524222256/https://www.legislation.qld.gov.au/LEGISLTN/ACTS/2002/02AC074.pdf) (PDF) from the original on 2017-05-24. Retrieved 2019-02-19. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-110)** ["Civil Union Act 2004 No 102 (as at 01 July 2013), Public Act Contents – New Zealand Legislation"](http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2004/0102/latest/DLM323385.html). [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20210308021547/https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2004/0102/latest/DLM323385.html) from the original on 8 March 2021. Retrieved 14 June 2013. 1. ^ [***a***](#cite_ref-legifrance_111-0) [***b***](#cite_ref-legifrance_111-1) ["LOI n° 2009-594 du 27 mai 2009 pour le développement économique des outre-mer"](http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichTexte.do?cidTexte=JORFTEXT000020671201&dateTexte=&categorieLien=id). [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20220515010236/https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichTexte.do?cidTexte=JORFTEXT000020671201&dateTexte=&categorieLien=id) from the original on 2022-05-15. Retrieved 2013-06-14. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-112)** ["LPartG - Gesetz über die Eingetragene Lebenspartnerschaft"](http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/lpartg/BJNR026610001.html). [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20210826152004/http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/lpartg/BJNR026610001.html) from the original on 2021-08-26. Retrieved 2013-06-14. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-113)** ["Uradni list Republike Slovenije"](http://www.uradni-list.si/1/content?id=56999). [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20160303220209/http://www.uradni-list.si/1/content?id=56999) from the original on 2016-03-03. Retrieved 2013-06-14. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-114)** ["Bundesgesetz über die eingetragene Partnerschaft gleichgeschlechtlicher Paare (Partnerschaftsgesetz, PartG)"](https://web.archive.org/web/20140207212010/http://www.admin.ch/opc/de/classified-compilation/20022194/201301010000/211.231.pdf) (PDF). Archived from [the original](http://www.admin.ch/opc/de/classified-compilation/20022194/201301010000/211.231.pdf) (PDF) on 2014-02-07. Retrieved 2013-06-14. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-115)** ["Jalisco, cuna de charros y tequila, da primer paso hacia el matrimonio gay"](https://web.archive.org/web/20131103092855/http://mexico.cnn.com/nacional/2013/11/01/jalisco-cuna-de-charros-y-tequila-da-primer-paso-hacia-el-matrimonio-gay). Archived from [the original](http://mexico.cnn.com/nacional/2013/11/01/jalisco-cuna-de-charros-y-tequila-da-primer-paso-hacia-el-matrimonio-gay) on 2013-11-03. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-116)** Shanghaiist (21 May 2015). ["Kaohsiung allows same-sex couples to register partnership"](https://web.archive.org/web/20150523214514/http://shanghaiist.com/2015/05/21/kaohsiung-allows-same-sex-couples-register-partnership.php). Archived from [the original](http://shanghaiist.com/2015/05/21/kaohsiung-allows-same-sex-couples-register-partnership.php) on 23 May 2015. Retrieved 10 December 2015. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-117)** ["Taipei opens registration for gay couples"](https://web.archive.org/web/20160118083446/http://www.gaystarnews.com/article/taipei-opens-registration-gay-couples180615/). 18 June 2015. Archived from [the original](http://www.gaystarnews.com/article/taipei-opens-registration-gay-couples180615/) on 18 January 2016. Retrieved 10 December 2015. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-118)** ["Taiwanese city becomes first to record gay relationships as next-of-kin in hospitals"](https://web.archive.org/web/20151016024322/http://www.gaystarnews.com/article/taiwanese-city-becomes-first-to-record-gay-relationships-as-next-of-kin-in-hospitals/). 13 October 2015. Archived from [the original](http://www.gaystarnews.com/article/taiwanese-city-becomes-first-to-record-gay-relationships-as-next-of-kin-in-hospitals/) on 16 October 2015. Retrieved 10 December 2015. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-119)** ["Tainan to register gay couples"](https://web.archive.org/web/20160128181758/http://www.gaystarnews.com/article/tainan-to-register-gay-couples/#gs.lHYtSBw). 28 January 2016. Archived from [the original](http://www.gaystarnews.com/article/tainan-to-register-gay-couples/#gs.lHYtSBw) on 28 January 2016. Retrieved 29 January 2016. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-120)** ["New Taipei City to start registering gay couples next week"](https://web.archive.org/web/20160130085625/http://www.gaystarnews.com/article/new-taipei-city-to-start-registering-gay-couples-next-week/). 29 January 2016. Archived from [the original](http://www.gaystarnews.com/article/new-taipei-city-to-start-registering-gay-couples-next-week/) on 30 January 2016. Retrieved 29 January 2016. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-121)** 編輯, TNL (7 March 2016). ["All Taiwan Municipalities To Recognize Same-Sex Relationships - The News Lens International Edition"](https://web.archive.org/web/20160328224947/http://international.thenewslens.com/post/294157/). Archived from [the original](http://international.thenewslens.com/post/294157/) on 28 March 2016. Retrieved 25 March 2016. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-122)** ["Chiayi to register gay couples"](https://web.archive.org/web/20160226124056/http://www.gaystarnews.com/article/chiayi-to-register-gay-couples/). 25 February 2016. Archived from [the original](http://www.gaystarnews.com/article/chiayi-to-register-gay-couples/) on 26 February 2016. Retrieved 3 March 2016. 1. ^ [***a***](#cite_ref-taipeitimes.com_123-0) [***b***](#cite_ref-taipeitimes.com_123-1) [***c***](#cite_ref-taipeitimes.com_123-2) [***d***](#cite_ref-taipeitimes.com_123-3) [***e***](#cite_ref-taipeitimes.com_123-4) [***f***](#cite_ref-taipeitimes.com_123-5) ["More counties recognize same-sex registrations - Taipei Times"](http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2017/06/08/2003672142). *www.taipeitimes.com*. 8 June 2017. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20190327090710/http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2017/06/08/2003672142) from the original on 27 March 2019. Retrieved 1 July 2017. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-124)** ["Cross-county same-sex partnership registration to be allowed | Society | FOCUS TAIWAN - CNA ENGLISH NEWS"](http://focustaiwan.tw/news/asoc/201707020014.aspx). *focustaiwan.tw*. 2 July 2017. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20190403162351/http://focustaiwan.tw/news/asoc/201707020014.aspx) from the original on 3 April 2019. Retrieved 10 July 2017. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-125)** Hernandez, Vittorio (1 April 2016). ["Taiwanese Same-Sex Pairs Move 1 Step Closer to Marriage Legalization as 8th Region Allows Registration of Gay Couples"](http://en.yibada.com/articles/113256/20160401/taiwanese-same-sex-pairs-move-1-step-closer-to-marriage-legalization-as-8th-region-allows-registration-of-gay-couples.htm). [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20160416185412/http://en.yibada.com/articles/113256/20160401/taiwanese-same-sex-pairs-move-1-step-closer-to-marriage-legalization-as-8th-region-allows-registration-of-gay-couples.htm) from the original on 16 April 2016. Retrieved 13 April 2016. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-126)** ["酷新聞 - 伴侶註記再下一城 105年4月1日起新竹縣開始受理"](https://web.archive.org/web/20160415222232/http://queer.watch/2016/04/08/10031). 8 April 2016. Archived from [the original](http://queer.watch/2016/04/08/10031) on 15 April 2016. Retrieved 9 May 2016. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-127)** ["520蔡英文上台後宜蘭第一個改變 開放同性伴侶註記 - 生活 - 自由時報電子報"](https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/breakingnews/1701581). 19 May 2016. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20190403174730/https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/breakingnews/1701581) from the original on 3 April 2019. Retrieved 23 May 2016. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-128)** ["HiNet"](https://web.archive.org/web/20161105224000/http://times.hinet.net/news/19460411). Archived from [the original](http://times.hinet.net/news/19460411) on 2016-11-05. Retrieved 2016-11-09. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-129)** ["SAME-SEX RELATIONSHIPS (EQUAL TREATMENT IN COMMONWEALTH LAWS-GENERAL LAW REFORM) ACT 2008 (NO. 144, 2008)"](https://web.archive.org/web/20150421160124/http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/num_act/srticllra2008769/). Austlii.edu.au. Archived from [the original](http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/num_act/srticllra2008769/) on 2015-04-21. Retrieved 2014-04-05. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-130)** ["Centrelink recognises same-sex relationships from 1 July 2009"](https://web.archive.org/web/20090227163241/http://www.centrelink.gov.au/internet/internet.nsf/individuals/same_sex.htm). Archived from [the original](http://www.centrelink.gov.au/internet/internet.nsf/individuals/same_sex.htm) on 2009-02-27. Retrieved 2009-03-30. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-131)** ["CITY OF SYDNEY RELATIONSHIPS DECLARATION PROGRAM"](https://web.archive.org/web/20160305093806/http://gaylawnet.com/ezine/partners/southsydney.pdf) (PDF). Archived from [the original](https://www.gaylawnet.com/ezine/partners/southsydney.pdf) (PDF) on 5 March 2016. Retrieved 5 September 2017. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-132)** ["Woollahra to get same-sex register - Star Observer"](https://web.archive.org/web/20170906040601/http://www.starobserver.com.au/news/national-news/new-south-wales-news/woollahra-to-get-same-sex-register/3177). *www.starobserver.com.au*. Archived from [the original](http://www.starobserver.com.au/news/national-news/new-south-wales-news/woollahra-to-get-same-sex-register/3177) on 6 September 2017. Retrieved 5 September 2017. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-133)** ["Relationship Declaration"](https://web.archive.org/web/20160201054501/http://www.bmcc.nsw.gov.au/yourcommunity/relationshipdeclaration). *Blue Mountains City Council*. Archived from [the original](http://www.bmcc.nsw.gov.au/yourcommunity/relationshipdeclaration) on February 1, 2016. Retrieved October 16, 2025. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-134)** ["City of Vincent : Relationship Declaration Register"](https://web.archive.org/web/20151115002312/http://www.vincent.wa.gov.au/Services/Relationship_Declaration_Register). Archived from [the original](http://www.vincent.wa.gov.au/Services/Relationship_Declaration_Register) on 2015-11-15. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-135)** ["Relationship Declaration Register » Town of Port Hedland"](https://web.archive.org/web/20161221162707/http://www.porthedland.wa.gov.au/relationship-declaration-register.aspx). Archived from [the original](http://www.porthedland.wa.gov.au/relationship-declaration-register.aspx) on 2016-12-21. Retrieved 2016-12-21. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-136)** Trevisan, Antônio Carlos (September 2004). ["Sucessão de companheiros sob a égide da Lei nº 10.406/2002"](https://jus.com.br/artigos/5663/sucessao-de-companheiros-sob-a-egide-da-lei-n-10-406-2002). *Jus Navigandi* (in Portuguese). Retrieved 21 August 2019. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-137)** ["Brazil Supreme Court awards gay couples new rights"](https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-13304442). *[BBC News Online](/source/BBC_News_Online)*. [www.bbc.co.uk](/source/Www.bbc.co.uk). [BBC](/source/BBC). 6 May 2011. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20190908091731/https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-13304442) from the original on 8 September 2019. Retrieved 21 August 2019. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-138)** ["Three-person civil union sparks controversy in Brazil"](https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-19402508). *[BBC News Online](/source/BBC_News_Online)*. [BBC Online](/source/BBC_Online). [BBC](/source/BBC). 28 August 2012. Retrieved 21 August 2019. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-hansard_2nd_reading_140-0)** ["Official Records for 9 June 1994"](https://web.archive.org/web/20171013070154/http://www.ontla.on.ca/web/house-proceedings/house_detail.do?Date=1994-6-9). *House Documents*. Legislative Assembly of Ontario. Archived from [the original](http://www.ontla.on.ca/web/house-proceedings/house_detail.do?Date=1994-6-9) on 2017-10-13. Retrieved October 12, 2017. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-141)** ["Colombian court rules in favour of equal rights for gay couples"](https://web.archive.org/web/20080704214811/http://www.pinknews.co.uk/news/articles/2005-5666.html). *[Pink News](/source/Pink_News)*. 6 October 2007. Archived from [the original](http://www.pinknews.co.uk/news/articles/2005-5666.html) on 4 July 2008. Retrieved 21 August 2019. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-142)** Grew, Tony (29 January 2009). ["Colombian court confirms equal rights for same-sex couples"](http://www.pinknews.co.uk/news/articles/2005-10938.html). *[Pink News](/source/Pink_News)*. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20090303154858/http://www.pinknews.co.uk/news/articles/2005-10938.html) from the original on 3 March 2009. Retrieved 21 August 2019. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-143)** ["Colombia legalises same-sex marriage"](https://web.archive.org/web/20160429100052/http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-04-29/colombia-legalises-same-sex-marriage/7371962). *ABC News*. 2016-04-29. Archived from [the original](https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-04-29/colombia-legalises-same-sex-marriage/7371962) on 2016-04-29. Retrieved 2026-05-24. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-144)** ["Colombia: Constitutional Court Upholds Same-Sex Marriage"](https://www.hrw.org/news/2016/04/28/colombia-constitutional-court-upholds-same-sex-marriage). *Human Rights Watch*. 2016-04-28. Retrieved 2026-05-24. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-145)** ["Costa Rica May Have Legalized Gay Civil Unions"](https://web.archive.org/web/20130711010246/http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/costa-rica-legalized-gay-civil-unions-19591091). Associated Press. 6 July 2013. Archived from [the original](https://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/costa-rica-legalized-gay-civil-unions-19591091) on 11 July 2013. Retrieved 6 July 2013. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-146)** ["Costa Rica Passes Legislation Permitting Gay Civil Unions -- By Accident"](http://latino.foxnews.com/latino/news/2013/07/05/costa-rica-passes-legislation-permitting-gay-civil-unions-by-accident/). Fox News Latino. 5 July 2013. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20141221144748/http://latino.foxnews.com/latino/news/2013/07/05/costa-rica-passes-legislation-permitting-gay-civil-unions-by-accident/) from the original on 21 December 2014. Retrieved 6 July 2013. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-147)** ["Costa Rican legislature accidentally passes gay marriage legalization"](https://web.archive.org/web/20130706152250/http://www.ticotimes.net/More-news/News-Briefs/Costa-Rican-legislature-accidentally-passes-gay-marriage-legalization_Wednesday-July-03-2013). Tico Times. 3 July 2013. Archived from [the original](http://www.ticotimes.net/More-news/News-Briefs/Costa-Rican-legislature-accidentally-passes-gay-marriage-legalization_Wednesday-July-03-2013) on 6 July 2013. Retrieved 6 July 2013. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-148)** ["Costa Rican lawyers claim 'accidental' bill does nothing for same-sex unions"](https://web.archive.org/web/20180920235913/https://www.gaystarnews.com/article/costa-rican-lawyers-claim-%e2%80%98accidental%e2%80%99-bill-does-nothing-same-sex-unions060713/). 6 July 2013. Archived from [the original](http://www.gaystarnews.com/article/costa-rican-lawyers-claim-%E2%80%98accidental%E2%80%99-bill-does-nothing-same-sex-unions060713) on 20 September 2018. Retrieved 6 July 2013. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-149)** ["The Backlot - Corner of Hollywood and Gay - NewNowNext"](https://web.archive.org/web/20081204012956/http://www.365gay.com/news/new-ecuador-constitution-includes-gay-rights-guarantees/). Archived from [the original](http://www.365gay.com/news/new-ecuador-constitution-includes-gay-rights-guarantees/) on 2008-12-04. Retrieved 2009-03-16. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-150)** ["Verpartnern für alle: 'Uns fällt ein Stein vom Herzen'"](https://www.nachrichten.at/oberoesterreich/Verpartnern-fuer-alle-Uns-faellt-ein-Stein-vom-Herzen;art4,2995874). *nachrichten.at* (in German). Retrieved 2021-04-27. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-151)** ["Verfassungsgerichtshof entscheidet"](https://www.derstandard.at/story/1285200270647/ep-fuer-heterosexuelle-verfassungsgerichtshof-entscheidet). *DER STANDARD* (in Austrian German). [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20210427055235/https://www.derstandard.at/story/1285200270647/ep-fuer-heterosexuelle-verfassungsgerichtshof-entscheidet) from the original on 2021-04-27. Retrieved 2021-04-27. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-152)** [""Verpartnert": Für dieses Paar ging ein Traum in Erfüllung"](https://www.nachrichten.at/oberoesterreich/verpartnert-fuer-dieses-paar-ging-ein-traum-in-erfuellung;art4,3139255). *nachrichten.at* (in Austrian German). Retrieved 2024-06-20. 1. ^ [***a***](#cite_ref-cphpost_153-0) [***b***](#cite_ref-cphpost_153-1) [The Copenhagen Post, 7 June 2012: *Gay marriage legalised*](http://cphpost.dk/news/national/gay-marriage-legalised) [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20130216001423/http://cphpost.dk/news/national/gay-marriage-legalised) 16 February 2013 at the [Wayback Machine](/source/Wayback_Machine) Retrieved 2012-09-19 1. **[^](#cite_ref-154)** ["Parliamentary majority for same-sex adoption"](https://web.archive.org/web/20100811070655/http://www.cphpost.dk/news/politics/90-politics/45091-parliamentary-majority-for-same-sex-adoption.html). Archived from [the original](http://www.cphpost.dk/news/politics/90-politics/45091-parliamentary-majority-for-same-sex-adoption.html) on August 11, 2010. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-155)** ["The Post – The Copenhagen Post – Danish news in english"](https://web.archive.org/web/20100508230634/http://www.cphpost.dk/component/content/48896.html?task=view). *cphpost.dk*. Archived from [the original](http://cphpost.dk/) on May 8, 2010. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-156)** ["Estonia legalises gay marriage – just"](https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/estonia-becomes-first-former-soviet-state-legalise-gay-marriage-9785869.html). *The Independent*. 9 October 2014. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20190507104109/https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/estonia-becomes-first-former-soviet-state-to-legalise-gay-marriage-9785869.html) from the original on 7 May 2019. Retrieved 1 October 2020. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-157)** Circulaire n°2007-03 CIV du 5 février 2007 1. **[^](#cite_ref-158)** ["Bilan démographique 2010"](http://www.insee.fr/fr/themes/document.asp?ref_id=ip1332). Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques. January 2011. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20181219115023/https://www.insee.fr/fr/themes/document.asp?ref_id=ip1332) from the original on 2018-12-19. Retrieved 2012-10-23. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-159)** ["Eine Ehe zum kleinen Preis"](https://www.arte.tv/de/articles/eine-ehe-zum-kleinen-preis-1). *ARTE* (in German). Retrieved 2021-04-27. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-160)** ["Civil partnership"](https://web.archive.org/web/20161016184449/http://www.taeterinnen.org/en/04_civilpartnership.html). Archived from [the original](https://www.taeterinnen.org/en/04_civilpartnership.html) on 16 October 2016. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-161)** Stocker, Frank (2017-06-30). ["Bundestagsbeschluss: Das ändert sich durch die Ehe für alle konkret"](https://www.welt.de/finanzen/article166099360/Das-aendert-sich-durch-die-Ehe-fuer-alle-konkret.html). *DIE WELT*. Retrieved 2021-04-27. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-162)** ["Ο "δωδεκάλογος" του συμφώνου συμβίωσης..., της Λίνας Γιάνναρου - Kathimerini"](https://www.kathimerini.gr/843084/article/epikairothta/ellada/o-dwdekalogos-toy-symfwnoy-symviwshs). 20 December 2015. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-163)** ["Hungarian Constitutional Court Affirms Registered Partnerships for Gay Couples"](https://web.archive.org/web/20160304032848/http://www.ukgaynews.org.uk/Archive/10/Mar/2401.htm). Archived from [the original](http://www.ukgaynews.org.uk/Archive/10/Mar/2401.htm) on 4 March 2016. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-164)** ["Óvígð sambúð"](https://web.archive.org/web/20140407201116/http://www.island.is/fjolskyldan/hjuskapur-sambud/ovigd-sambud) (in Icelandic). Island.is. Archived from [the original](https://www.island.is/fjolskyldan/hjuskapur-sambud/ovigd-sambud) on 2014-04-07. Retrieved 2014-04-05. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-165)** [O'Regan, Michael](/source/Michael_O'Regan_(journalist)) (7 July 2010). ["Dáil passes Civil Partnership Bill"](https://web.archive.org/web/20121021134701/http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/breaking/2010/0701/breaking41.html). *[The Irish Times](/source/The_Irish_Times)*. Archived from [the original](https://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/breaking/2010/0701/breaking41.html) on 21 October 2012. Retrieved 21 August 2019. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-166)** [McGee, Harry](/source/Harry_McGee) (7 July 2010). ["Seanad passes Partnership Bill"](https://web.archive.org/web/20121021135010/http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/breaking/2010/0708/breaking59.html). *[The Irish Times](/source/The_Irish_Times)*. Archived from [the original](https://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/breaking/2010/0708/breaking59.html) on 21 October 2012. Retrieved 21 August 2019. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-167)** ["Ireland's first civil partnerships have taken place early and in secret"](http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2011/02/20/irelands-first-civil-partnerships-have-taken-place-early-and-in-secret). *[Pinknews.co.uk](/source/Pinknews.co.uk)*. 20 February 2011. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20180815050205/https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2011/02/20/irelands-first-civil-partnerships-have-taken-place-early-and-in-secret/) from the original on 15 August 2018. Retrieved 5 April 2014. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-rte-703205-referendum-byelection_168-0)** ["Ireland says Yes to same-sex marriage"](https://www.rte.ie/news/vote2015/2015/0523/703205-referendum-byelection/). RTÉ News. 23 May 2015. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20150523224354/http://www.rte.ie/news/vote2015/2015/0523/703205-referendum-byelection/) from the original on 23 May 2015. Retrieved 23 May 2015. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-buzzfeed_169-0)** ["Italian Senate Adopts Civil Union Bill"](https://www.buzzfeed.com/lesterfeder/italian-senate-adopts-civil-union-bill). *[BuzzFeed](/source/BuzzFeed)*. 25 February 2016. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20180612143406/https://www.buzzfeed.com/lesterfeder/italian-senate-adopts-civil-union-bill) from the original on 12 June 2018. Retrieved 13 May 2016. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-170)** ["Civil unions become law"](http://www.ansa.it/english/news/2016/05/11/civil-unions-become-law_19e92919-e154-446b-9ec7-f712319fa41b.html). [ANSA](/source/Agenzia_Nazionale_Stampa_Associata). 11 May 2016. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20181116044827/http://www.ansa.it/english/news/2016/05/11/civil-unions-become-law_19e92919-e154-446b-9ec7-f712319fa41b.html) from the original on 16 November 2018. Retrieved 11 May 2016. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-:0_171-0)** ["Italian MPs back same-sex unions in vote for Renzi - BBC News"](https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-36269605). *BBC News*. 11 May 2016. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20180928024728/https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-36269605) from the original on 28 September 2018. Retrieved 12 May 2016. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-ansa_172-0)** ["Mattarella signs civil-unions law"](http://www.ansa.it/english/news/politics/2016/05/20/mattarella-signs-civil-unions-law-2_a0d181c1-1ed6-42d8-873c-a810ba59497c.html). *ANSA*. 20 May 2016. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20190327101358/http://www.ansa.it/english/news/politics/2016/05/20/mattarella-signs-civil-unions-law-2_a0d181c1-1ed6-42d8-873c-a810ba59497c.html) from the original on 27 March 2019. Retrieved 21 May 2016. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-173)** ["Home"](https://web.archive.org/web/20110318123116/http://www.tagesschau.sf.tv/Nachrichten/Archiv/2011/03/16/International/Liechtenstein-Ja-zur-Homo-Ehe). Archived from [the original](http://www.tagesschau.sf.tv/Nachrichten/Archiv/2011/03/16/International/Liechtenstein-Ja-zur-Homo-Ehe) on 2011-03-18. Retrieved 2011-03-17. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-n°_1481_174-0)** ["n° 1481 - Loi du 17 décembre 2019 relative aux contrats civils de solidarité"](https://www.conseil-national.mc/2019/12/04/1481-loi-du-17-decembre-2019-relative-aux-contrats-civils-de-solidarite) (in French). 4 December 2019. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-175)** Kajosevic, Samir (2021-07-26). ["Montenegro Makes History With First Same-Sex Marriage"](https://balkaninsight.com/2021/07/26/montenegro-makes-history-with-first-same-sex-marriage/). *Balkan Insight*. Retrieved 2025-03-01. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-176)** ["The first same-sex marriage in Montenegro"](https://www.rolplatform.org/the-first-same-sex-marriage-in-montenegro/). *Rule of Law Platform*. 2021-09-10. Retrieved 2025-03-01. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-177)** Kajosevic, Samir (2020-07-02). ["Montenegro Parliament Narrowly Votes to Legalize Same-sex Unions"](https://balkaninsight.com/2020/07/02/montenegro-parliament-narrowly-votes-to-legalize-same-sex-unions/). *Balkan Insight*. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20200712000636/https://balkaninsight.com/2020/07/02/montenegro-parliament-narrowly-votes-to-legalize-same-sex-unions/) from the original on 2020-07-12. Retrieved 2025-03-01. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-178)** ["Montenegro: New Law Establishing Registration of Same-Sex Partnerships Enters into Force"](https://www.loc.gov/item/global-legal-monitor/2020-08-05/montenegro-new-law-establishing-registration-of-same-sex-partnerships-enters-into-force/). *Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. 20540 USA*. Retrieved 2025-03-01. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-179)** Dunbar, William (September 19, 2012). ["Equal marriage around the world"](https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/equal-marriage-around-world-8153205.html). *The Independent*. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-180)** Associated Press (April 1, 2021). ["The Dutch Went First in 2001; Who Has Same-Sex Marriage Now?"](https://www.usnews.com/news/world/articles/2021-04-01/the-dutch-went-first-in-2001-who-has-same-sex-marriage-now). *U.S. News & World Report*. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-181)** Rzepliński, Andrzej (April 2008). ["Legal Study on Homophobia and Discrimination on Grounds of Sexual Orientation – Poland"](https://fra.europa.eu/sites/default/files/fra_uploads/332-FRA-hdgso-NR_PL.pdf) (PDF). *fra.europa.eu*. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-182)** Queermedia.pl. ["Tusk nie chce rozmawiać"](http://queer.pl/news/190654/tusk-nie-chce-rozmawiac). 1. **[^](#cite_ref-183)** ["Sejm przeciwko związkom partnerskim - Polityka - rp.pl"](https://web.archive.org/web/20140407080541/http://www.rp.pl/artykul/16,973895-Sejm-przeciwko-zwiazkom-partnerskim.html?p=1). Archived from [the original](http://www.rp.pl/artykul/16,973895-Sejm-przeciwko-zwiazkom-partnerskim.html?p=1) on 2014-04-07. Retrieved 2013-01-25. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-184)** ["KRONIKA SEJMOWA"](http://orka.sejm.gov.pl/kronika.nsf/0/07F6202077378DFCC1257B1F00508EA9/%24File/kronika031_7.pdf) (PDF). *Kronika Sejmowakancelaria*. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20140114141318/http://orka.sejm.gov.pl/kronika.nsf/0/07F6202077378DFCC1257B1F00508EA9/%24File/kronika031_7.pdf) (PDF) from the original on 2014-01-14. Retrieved 2014-04-05. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-185)** ["Wyborcza.pl"](http://wyborcza.pl/1,75478,12186312,Zwiazki_partnerskie_wracaja_na_polke__Sejm_robi_unik.html). [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20120728135027/http://wyborcza.pl/1,75478,12186312,Zwiazki_partnerskie_wracaja_na_polke__Sejm_robi_unik.html) from the original on 2012-07-28. Retrieved 2013-01-25. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-CBOS_Civil_union_186-0)** Feliksiak, Michał (February 2013). ["Stosunek do praw gejów i lesbijek oraz związków partnerskich"](https://cbos.pl/SPISKOM.POL/2013/K_024_13.PDF) (PDF) (in Polish). Centrum Badania Opinii Społecznej. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20131203012144/http://www.cbos.pl/SPISKOM.POL/2013/K_024_13.PDF) (PDF) from the original on 3 December 2013. Retrieved 30 June 2014. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-187)** ["Związki partnerskie do szuflady. Sejm nie zajął się projektem"](http://www.tvn24.pl/wiadomosci-z-kraju,3/sejm-nie-zajal-sie-ustawa-ws-zwiazkow-partnerskich-wiekszosc-poslow-przeciw,499563.html) (in Polish). tvn24.pl. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20190416050616/https://www.tvn24.pl/wiadomosci-z-kraju,3/sejm-nie-zajal-sie-ustawa-ws-zwiazkow-partnerskich-wiekszosc-poslow-przeciw,499563.html) from the original on 2019-04-16. Retrieved 2015-06-15. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-188)** ["Związki partnerskie - nie w tej kadencji"](https://www.polityka.pl/tygodnikpolityka/kraj/1620801,1,zwiazki-partnerskie--nie-w-tej-kadencji.read) (in Polish). polityka.pl. 26 May 2015. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20190503002011/https://www.polityka.pl/tygodnikpolityka/kraj/1620801,1,zwiazki-partnerskie--nie-w-tej-kadencji.read) from the original on 3 May 2019. Retrieved 28 May 2015. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-189)** ["San Marino"](https://www.state.gov/reports/2019-country-reports-on-human-rights-practices/san-marino/). *United States Department of State*. Retrieved 2025-03-02. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-190)** ["Legge 20 novembre 2018 n°147 "Regolamentazione delle Unioni Civili""](https://www.consigliograndeegenerale.sm/on-line/home/scheda17160637.html). *Consiglio Grande e Generale* (in Italian). [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20181121203749/https://www.consigliograndeegenerale.sm/on-line/home/scheda17160637.html) from the original on November 21, 2018. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-191)** ["B92 - News - Globe - Slovenia passes same-sex marriage law"](https://web.archive.org/web/20121023181358/http://www.b92.net/eng/news/globe-article.php?yyyy=2006&mm=07&dd=25&nav_category=123&nav_id=35807). Archived from [the original](http://www.b92.net/eng/news/globe-article.php?yyyy=2006&mm=07&dd=25&nav_category=123&nav_id=35807) on 23 October 2012. Retrieved 26 July 2012. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-pis_192-0)** (in Slovene) [Zakon o registraciji istospolne partnerske skupnosti (ZRIPS)](http://pisrs.si/Pis.web/pregledPredpisa?id=ZAKO4335) [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20180731183116/http://pisrs.si/Pis.web/pregledPredpisa?id=ZAKO4335) 2018-07-31 at the [Wayback Machine](/source/Wayback_Machine) 1. **[^](#cite_ref-193)** ["FindArticles.com - CBSi"](https://web.archive.org/web/20081227075205/http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb6593/is_/ai_n25984534). Archived from [the original](http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb6593/is_/ai_n25984534) on 2008-12-27. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-194)** ["RS 211.231 Loi fédérale du 18 juin 2004 sur le partenariat enregistré entre personnes du même sexe (Loi sur le partenariat, LPart)"](https://www.admin.ch/opc/fr/classified-compilation/20022194/index.html#a28). *www.admin.ch*. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20121010192747/http://www.admin.ch/ch/f/rs/211_231/a27.html#a28) from the original on 2012-10-10. Retrieved 2020-10-01. 1. ^ [***a***](#cite_ref-:1_195-0) [***b***](#cite_ref-:1_195-1) ["Ein PACS für die Schweiz?": Tagung zu neuen Rechtsformen für Paarbeziehungen](https://www.bj.admin.ch/bj/de/home/aktuell/news/2017/ref_2017-06-222.html)[Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20190323020010/https://www.bj.admin.ch/bj/de/home/aktuell/news/2017/ref_2017-06-222.html) March 23, 2019, at the [Wayback Machine](/source/Wayback_Machine) 1. **[^](#cite_ref-196)** ["BBC NEWS - UK - 'Gay weddings' become law in UK"](http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4493094.stm). 5 December 2005. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20051210144750/http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4493094.stm) from the original on 10 December 2005. Retrieved 5 December 2005. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-197)** Walker, Peter (2013-01-04). ["Church of England rules gay men in civil partnerships can become bishops"](https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/jan/04/church-of-england-gay-bishops). *The Guardian*. [ISSN](/source/ISSN_(identifier)) [0261-3077](https://search.worldcat.org/issn/0261-3077). [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20160925012956/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/jan/04/church-of-england-gay-bishops) from the original on 2016-09-25. Retrieved 2016-09-16. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-198)** Sky News: [Drive for same-sex marriages](http://news.sky.com/home/article/16071578) [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20111106040752/http://news.sky.com/home/article/16071578) November 6, 2011, at the [Wayback Machine](/source/Wayback_Machine). 17 September 2011. Access date: 31 October 2012. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-199)** ["Scottish government launches gay marriage consultation"](https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-14764707). *BBC News*. 2011-09-02. Retrieved 2026-05-24. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-200)** ["Registration of Civil Partnerships, Same Sex Marriage: Consultation Analysis"](https://www.gov.scot/publications/registration-civil-partnerships-same-sex-marriage-consultation-analysis/pages/2/). *www.gov.scot*. Retrieved 2026-05-24. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-201)** Boycott, Owen (27 June 2018). ["Ban on heterosexual civil partnerships in UK ruled discriminatory"](https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2018/jun/27/uk-ban-on-heterosexual-civil-partnerships-ruled-discriminatory). *The Guardian*. Retrieved 4 January 2019. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-202)** Boycott, Owen; Carrell, Severin (2 October 2018). ["Civil partnerships to be opened to heterosexual couples"](https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/oct/02/civil-partnerships-to-be-opened-to-heterosexual-couples). *The Guardian*. Retrieved 4 January 2019. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-203)** ["Great Britain opens civil partnerships for heterosexuals"](https://www.queer.de/detail.php?article_id=32048). *queer.de*. 2018-10-02. Retrieved 2024-03-16. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-204)** ["Civil partnerships for heterosexual couples - what you need to know"](https://www.familylaw.co.uk/news_and_comment/civil-partnerships-for-heterosexual-couples-what-you-need-to-know). *www.familylaw.co.uk*. 2020-03-05. Retrieved 2024-06-19. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-205)** Erich Adolfo Moncada Cota (November 19, 2006). ["Mexico City Approves Same Sex Unions"](https://web.archive.org/web/20091120061120/http://english.ohmynews.com/articleview/article_view.asp?menu=c10400&no=329768&rel_no=1). Archived from [the original](http://english.ohmynews.com/articleview/article_view.asp?menu=c10400&no=329768&rel_no=1) on 20 November 2009. Retrieved 9 December 2009. 1. ^ [***a***](#cite_ref-PCS_206-0) [***b***](#cite_ref-PCS_206-1) S. Lynne Walker (5 March 2007). ["New law propels gay rights in Mexico"](https://web.archive.org/web/20110719114446/http://legacy.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20070305/news_1n5gaylaw.html). Mail & Guardian Online. Archived from [the original](http://legacy.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20070305/news_1n5gaylaw.html) on 19 July 2011. Retrieved 15 December 2009. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-207)** ["Mexico's first civil union"](https://web.archive.org/web/20070530011312/http://uk.gay.com/headlines/10984). Gay.com UK & Ireland. Associated Press. 1 February 2007. Archived from [the original](http://uk.gay.com/headlines/10984) on 30 May 2007. Retrieved 15 December 2009. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-Christine_Delsol_208-0)** Christine Delsol (26 November 2008). ["Mexico's top destinations for gay vacations"](https://web.archive.org/web/20120315230253/http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=%2Fg%2Fa%2F2008%2F11%2F26%2Fmexicomix112608.DTL&type=printable). *San Francisco Gate*. Archived from [the original](http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2008/11/26/mexicomix112608.DTL&type=printable) on 15 March 2012. Retrieved 15 December 2009. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-209)** El Universal (23 December 2009). ["Acepta gobernador de Colima debatir sobre sociedades en convivencia"](http://mx.news.yahoo.com/s/23122009/90/n-mexico-acepta-gobernador-colima-debatir-sociedades.html) (in Spanish). Yahoo! México. Retrieved 26 December 2009.{{[cite web](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Cite_web)}}: CS1 maint: deprecated archival service ([link](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:CS1_maint:_deprecated_archival_service)) 1. **[^](#cite_ref-cnnjal_210-0)** ["Jalisco, cuna de charros y tequila, da primer paso hacia el matrimonio gay"](https://web.archive.org/web/20131103092855/http://mexico.cnn.com/nacional/2013/11/01/jalisco-cuna-de-charros-y-tequila-da-primer-paso-hacia-el-matrimonio-gay) (in Spanish). CNN México. 1 November 2013. Archived from [the original](http://mexico.cnn.com/nacional/2013/11/01/jalisco-cuna-de-charros-y-tequila-da-primer-paso-hacia-el-matrimonio-gay) on 3 November 2013. Retrieved 2 November 2013. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-NZ_Herald_9002456_211-0)** ["Civil Unions Bill passed"](http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=9002456). *[The New Zealand Herald](/source/The_New_Zealand_Herald)*. 9 December 2004. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20181119053130/http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=9002456) from the original on 19 November 2018. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-212)** ["Seuffert, Nan --- "Sexual Citizenship and the Civil Union Act 2004" \[2006\] VUWLawRw 13; (2006) 37(2) Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 281"](https://www.nzlii.org/nz/journals/VUWLawRw/2006/13.html). *www.nzlii.org*. Retrieved 2025-04-26. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-213)** ["SA same-sex marriage law signed"](https://web.archive.org/web/20061212010224/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/6159991.stm). *BBC News*. 30 November 2006. Archived from [the original](http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/6159991.stm) on December 12, 2006. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-214)** ["Civil Union Act 2006"](https://www.saflii.org/za/legis/consol_act/cua2006139/). *www.saflii.org*. Retrieved 2025-04-26. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-215)** ["From the archives: Vermont becomes first state to introduce civil unions"](https://web.archive.org/web/20211117165756/https://www.mynbc5.com/article/from-the-archives-vermont-becomes-first-state-to-introduce-civil-unions/30337708). *NBC5*. December 26, 2019. Archived from [the original](https://www.mynbc5.com/article/from-the-archives-vermont-becomes-first-state-to-introduce-civil-unions/30337708) on November 17, 2021. Retrieved October 16, 2025. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-216)** ["Connecticut becomes third state to recognize marriage equality for gay and lesbian couples"](https://web.archive.org/web/20210107015511/https://www.hrc.org/press-releases/connecticut-becomes-third-state-to-recognize-marriage-equality-for-gay-and). *Human Rights Council*. October 10, 2008. Archived from [the original](https://www.hrc.org/press-releases/connecticut-becomes-third-state-to-recognize-marriage-equality-for-gay-and) on January 7, 2021. Retrieved October 16, 2025. 1. ^ [***a***](#cite_ref-resignation_217-0) [***b***](#cite_ref-resignation_217-1) Barry, Ellen (February 20, 2007). ["Eagerness and some resignation as civil union law takes effect"](https://web.archive.org/web/20150908071903/https://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/20/nyregion/20civil.html). *The New York Times*. Archived from [the original](https://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/20/nyregion/20civil.html) on September 8, 2015. Retrieved October 16, 2025. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-218)** Faiola, Anthony. ["N.H. set to approve same-sex civil unions"](https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna18319267). *NBC News*. Retrieved October 16, 2025. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-219)** Peters, Stephen (October 17, 2014). ["Supreme Court clears the way for marriage equality THREE times"](https://web.archive.org/web/20220816091506/https://www.hrc.org/press-releases/supreme-court-clears-the-way-for-marriage-equality-three-times). *Human Rights Campaign*. Archived from [the original](https://www.hrc.org/press-releases/supreme-court-clears-the-way-for-marriage-equality-three-times) on August 16, 2022. Retrieved October 16, 2025. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-220)** Liptak, Adam (October 6, 2014). ["Supreme Court delivers tacit win to gay marriage"](https://web.archive.org/web/20141115001556/https://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/07/us/denying-review-justices-clear-way-for-gay-marriage-in-5-states.html). *The New York Times*. Archived from [the original](https://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/07/us/denying-review-justices-clear-way-for-gay-marriage-in-5-states.html) on November 15, 2014. Retrieved October 16, 2025. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-221)** Gaynor, Tim (2013-04-03). ["Bisbee Becomes Arizona's First City To Allow Same-Sex Civil Unions"](https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/03/bisbee-civil-unions_n_3004088.html). *Huffington Post*. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20130407001239/http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/03/bisbee-civil-unions_n_3004088.html?) from the original on 2013-04-07. Retrieved 2017-05-31. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-222)** ["Arizona Attorney General Tom Horne to sue to block civil unions in Bisbee"](https://web.archive.org/web/20251017000102/https://tucson.com/news/arizona-ag-tom-horne-to-sue-to-block-civil-unions-in-bisbee/article_eb348bd2-9c88-11e2-9029-0019bb2963f4.html). *Tucson*. Associated Press. April 3, 2013. Archived from [the original](https://tucson.com/news/arizona-ag-tom-horne-to-sue-to-block-civil-unions-in-bisbee/article_eb348bd2-9c88-11e2-9029-0019bb2963f4.html) on October 17, 2025. Retrieved October 16, 2025. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-223)** ["Ariz. attorney general, Bisbee OK civil-union changes"](https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/04/30/gay-civil-unions-bisbee/2123887/). *USA TODAY*. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20191113050438/https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/04/30/gay-civil-unions-bisbee/2123887/) from the original on 2019-11-13. Retrieved 2017-05-31. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-224)** Walkley, A. J. (2013-07-19). ["Civil Unions in Tucson"](https://www.huffingtonpost.com/aj-walkley/civil-unions-in-tucson_b_3586513.html). *Huffington Post*. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20160426110351/http://www.huffingtonpost.com/aj-walkley/civil-unions-in-tucson_b_3586513.html) from the original on 2016-04-26. Retrieved 2017-05-31. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-225)** ["Jerome, Arizona Approves Civil Unions For Gay Couples"](http://www.ontopmag.com/article/16292/Jerome_Arizona_Approves_Civil_Unions_For_Gay_Couples). *On Top Magazine*. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20171019055321/http://www.ontopmag.com/article/16292/Jerome_Arizona_Approves_Civil_Unions_For_Gay_Couples) from the original on 2017-10-19. Retrieved 2017-05-31. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-226)** ["Civil unions pass unanimously in Clarkdale"](https://www.verdenews.com/news/2013/nov/13/civil-unions-pass-unanimously-in-clarkdale/). *verdenews.com*. Retrieved 2017-05-31. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-227)** [ap], FELICIA FONSECA (2013-12-18). ["Cottonwood latest Ariz. city to approve same-sex civil unions"](https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2013/12/cottonwood-latest-ariz-city-to-approve-same-sex-civil-unions/). *LGBTQ Nation*. Retrieved 2017-05-31. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-228)** Lineberger, Mark. ["Camp Verde rejects civil unions - JournalAZ.com - Verde Valley News, Jobs, Classifieds"](https://web.archive.org/web/20171019024118/http://www.journalaz.com/news/camp-verde/2232-camp-verde-rejects-civil-unions.html). *www.journalaz.com*. Archived from [the original](http://www.journalaz.com/news/camp-verde/2232-camp-verde-rejects-civil-unions.html) on 2017-10-19. Retrieved 2017-05-31. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-229)** ["Sedona approves local ordinance on civil unions – Arizona Capitol Times"](http://azcapitoltimes.com/news/2013/09/25/sedona-arizona-approves-local-ordinance-on-same-sex-civil-unions/). *azcapitoltimes.com*. Associated Press. 25 September 2013. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20160430043441/http://azcapitoltimes.com/news/2013/09/25/sedona-arizona-approves-local-ordinance-on-same-sex-civil-unions/) from the original on 2016-04-30. Retrieved 2017-05-31. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-230)** ["Tempe council to hear legal advice on civil unions – Arizona Capitol Times"](http://azcapitoltimes.com/news/2013/04/04/tempe-arizona-council-to-hear-legal-advice-on-same-sex-civil-unions/). *azcapitoltimes.com*. Associated Press. 4 April 2013. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20160716040019/http://azcapitoltimes.com/news/2013/04/04/tempe-arizona-council-to-hear-legal-advice-on-same-sex-civil-unions/) from the original on 2016-07-16. Retrieved 2017-05-31. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-231)** Day, Jones (August 31, 2015). ["Legal Recognition of Same-Sex Relationships"](https://web.archive.org/web/20150924234758/http://www.samesexrelationshipguide.com/~/media/files/ssrguide/northamerica/united-states/legal-recognition-of-samesex-relationships--united-states-of-america--arizona.pdf) (PDF). *samesexrelationshipguide.com*. Archived from [the original](http://www.samesexrelationshipguide.com/~/media/files/ssrguide/northamerica/united-states/legal-recognition-of-samesex-relationships--united-states-of-america--arizona.pdf) (PDF) on September 24, 2015. Retrieved May 30, 2017. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-232)** Moreno, Ivan (March 21, 2013). ["Civil Unions Signed into Law in Colorado"](https://web.archive.org/web/20140319034413/http://bigstory.ap.org/article/civil-unions-be-signed-law-colorado). Associated Press. Archived from [the original](http://bigstory.ap.org/article/civil-unions-be-signed-law-colorado) on March 19, 2014. Retrieved August 23, 2014. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-nytcu_233-0)** Frosch, Dan (March 12, 2013). ["Colorado Legalizes Civil Unions for Same-Sex Couples"](https://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/13/us/colorado-legalizes-civil-unions-for-same-sex-couples.html). *New York Times*. Retrieved March 13, 2013. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-234)** Coffman, Keith (March 13, 2013). ["Colorado lawmakers approve bill for same-sex civil unions"](https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-gaymarriage-colorado-idUSBRE92C04120130313). *Reuters*. Retrieved March 13, 2013. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-235)** Fahrenthold, David A. (2 October 2005). ["Connecticut's First Same-Sex Unions Proceed Civilly"](https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/01/AR2005100100962.html). [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20160304000607/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/01/AR2005100100962.html) from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 25 August 2017 – via washingtonpost.com. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-236)** Miller, Beth (May 12, 2011). ["Governor signs Delaware civil unions bill"](https://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2011-05-12-delaware-civil-unions_n.htm). *[The News Journal](/source/The_News_Journal)*. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20110515090416/http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2011-05-12-delaware-civil-unions_n.htm) from the original on May 15, 2011. Retrieved May 12, 2011. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-CNN-sign_237-0)** ["D.C. mayor signs same-sex marriage bill"](https://web.archive.org/web/20111205151815/http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/12/18/d-c-mayor-signs-same-sex-marriage-bill/). [CNN](/source/CNN). December 18, 2009. Archived from [the original](http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/12/18/d-c-mayor-signs-same-sex-marriage-bill/) on December 5, 2011. Retrieved December 18, 2009. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-APGresko_238-0)** Gresko, Jessica (March 3, 2010). ["Same-sex marriage becomes legal in DC"](https://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gftV6RnfBC8iPPWGM0SGQeNLiC6QD9E71J3G0). [Associated Press](/source/Associated_Press). Retrieved March 3, 2010.{{[cite news](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Cite_news)}}: CS1 maint: deprecated archival service ([link](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:CS1_maint:_deprecated_archival_service)) 1. **[^](#cite_ref-239)** Kathryn Burke, Mary (March 8, 2010). ["First Two Same Sex Couples to Be Married in Washington, D.C."](https://abcnews.go.com/TheLaw/sex-couples-married-washington-dc/story?id=10042079) *ABC News*. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20250509103312/https://abcnews.go.com/TheLaw/sex-couples-married-washington-dc/story?id=10042079) from the original on May 9, 2025. Retrieved April 1, 2025. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-dcdp-hrc_240-0)** ["D.C. Domestic Partnership Program"](http://www.glaa.org/archive/2001/dpfactsheet103001.shtml). Human Rights Campaign. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20110716113648/http://www.glaa.org/archive/2001/dpfactsheet103001.shtml) from the original on July 16, 2011. Retrieved May 15, 2008. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-241)** [Associated Press](/source/Associated_Press) (July 7, 2009). ["Washington, D.C., Recognizes Same-Sex Marriages"](https://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/08/us/08marriage.html). *[New York Times](/source/New_York_Times)*. Retrieved December 1, 2009. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-242)** Gaynair, Gillian (July 7, 2009). ["Gay Marriage Bill Takes Effect in Nation's Capital"](http://www.cbn.com/cbnnews/politics/2009/July/Gay-Marriage-Bill-Takes-Effect-in-Nations-Capital/). *Christian Broadcasting Network*. Retrieved December 1, 2009. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-243)** Levs, Josh (January 2, 2012). ["Two more states allow same-sex civil unions"](https://www.cnn.com/2012/01/01/us/civil-unions/). *CNN*. Retrieved August 27, 2013. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-244)** ["Joyous same-sex couples wed in Hawaii as gay marriage becomes legal"](https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-gaymarriage-hawaii-idUSBRE9B10GA20131202). *Reuters*. Honolulu. December 2, 2013. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20230501104132/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-gaymarriage-hawaii-idUSBRE9B10GA20131202) from the original on May 1, 2023. Retrieved March 26, 2025. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-advocate.com_245-0)** ["First same-sex couples marry in Hawaii"](http://www.advocate.com/politics/marriage-equality/2013/12/02/first-same-sex-couples-marry-hawaii). *Advocate.com*. December 2, 2013. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20131203200735/http://www.advocate.com/politics/marriage-equality/2013/12/02/first-same-sex-couples-marry-hawaii) from the original on December 3, 2013. Retrieved December 7, 2013. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-246)** Avila, Oscar; Huppke, Rex (Dec 2, 2010). ["Civil unions aren't just for same-sex couples"](https://web.archive.org/web/20101205023356/http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/ct-met-heterosexuals-civil-unions-12020101202%2C0%2C571376.story). *[Chicago Tribune](/source/Chicago_Tribune)*. Archived from [the original](https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/ct-met-heterosexuals-civil-unions-12020101202,0,571376.story) on December 5, 2010. Retrieved July 17, 2011. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-247)** ["NJ Division of Taxation - Civil Union Act"](https://www.nj.gov/treasury/taxation/civilunionact.shtml). *www.nj.gov*. Retrieved 2025-04-07. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-248)** Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 22, sec. 2710 1. **[^](#cite_ref-249)** ["Maine Marriage/Relationship Recognition Law"](https://web.archive.org/web/20131104003053/http://www.hrc.org/laws-and-legislation/entry/maine-marriage-relationship-recognition-law). *Human Rights Campaign*. Archived from [the original](http://www.hrc.org/laws-and-legislation/entry/maine-marriage-relationship-recognition-law) on 4 November 2013. Retrieved September 9, 2021. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-250)** ["Concord Monitor – Lynch signs bill legalizing civil unions"](https://web.archive.org/web/20071103153005/http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=%2F20070531%2FBREAK%2F70531001%2F1030). Archived from [the original](https://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070531/BREAK/70531001/1030) on November 3, 2007. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-Wang_251-0)** Wang, Beverley. (April 26, 2007) [State Senate approves civil unions for same-sex couples](https://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070426/REPOSITORY/70426002/1030) [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20071103152712/http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=%2F20070426%2FREPOSITORY%2F70426002%2F1030) 2007-11-03 at the [Wayback Machine](/source/Wayback_Machine) *Concord Monitor*. Accessed April 26, 2007. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-252)** ["Concord Monitor – State Senate approves civil unions for same-sex couples"](https://web.archive.org/web/20071103152712/http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=%2F20070426%2FREPOSITORY%2F70426002%2F1030). Archived from [the original](https://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070426/REPOSITORY/70426002/1030) on November 3, 2007. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-HB436_253-0)** ["HB 436-FN-LOCAL – Version Adopted by Both Bodies"](http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/legislation/2009/HB0436.html). [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20090410081608/http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/legislation/2009/hb0436.html) from the original on April 10, 2009. Retrieved May 15, 2009. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-254)** ["Domestic Partnerships"](https://www.nj.gov/health/vital/registration-vital/domestic-partnerships/). *New Jersey Department of Health*. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20250414001058/https://nj.gov/health/vital/registration-vital/domestic-partnerships/) from the original on 2025-04-14. Retrieved 2025-04-07. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-255)** Ryan, Cy (2009-05-31). ["With veto override, domestic partners bill becomes law"](https://lasvegassun.com/news/2009/may/31/veto-override-domestic-partners-bill-becomes-law/). *Las Vegas Sun*. Retrieved 2025-05-10. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-256)** ["Nevada legalizing domestic partnerships - CNN.com"](https://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/05/31/nevada.domestic.partnerships/index.html?iref=nextin). *www.cnn.com*. Retrieved 2025-05-10. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-257)** ["Nevada Legislature rejects Gov. Gibbons domestic partnership veto"](https://www.nevadaappeal.com/news/2009/may/31/nevada-legislature-rejects-gov-gibbons-domestic-pa/). *www.nevadaappeal.com*. Retrieved 2025-05-10. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-258)** ["Nevada Senate Overrides Veto on Domestic Partners Measure"](https://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/31/us/31nevada.html). *The New York Times*. 2009-05-31. [ISSN](/source/ISSN_(identifier)) [0362-4331](https://search.worldcat.org/issn/0362-4331). Retrieved 2025-05-10. 1. ^ [***a***](#cite_ref-vtculaw_259-0) [***b***](#cite_ref-vtculaw_259-1) ["Professional Regulation - Home - Vermont Secretary of State"](https://web.archive.org/web/20090923144929/http://www.sec.state.vt.us/otherprg/civilunions/civilunionlaw.html). Archived from [the original](http://www.sec.state.vt.us/otherprg/civilunions/civilunionlaw.html) on 2009-09-23. Retrieved 2006-12-23. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-260)** ["Anti-gay-marriage measure qualifies for Wash. state ballot"](http://content.usatoday.com/communities/ondeadline/post/2012/06/anti-gay-marriage-measure-qualifies-for-wash-state-ballot/1). *USA Today*. June 12, 2012. [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20210224100010/http://content.usatoday.com/communities/ondeadline/post/2012/06/anti-gay-marriage-measure-qualifies-for-wash-state-ballot/1) from the original on February 24, 2021. Retrieved August 16, 2012. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-261)** ["Ley Nº 18.246 UNIÓN CONCUBINARIA"](https://web.archive.org/web/20170410215612/https://legislativo.parlamento.gub.uy/temporales/leytemp968345.htm) (in Spanish). [General Assembly of Uruguay](/source/General_Assembly_of_Uruguay). Archived from [the original](https://legislativo.parlamento.gub.uy/temporales/leytemp968345.htm) on April 10, 2017. Retrieved April 11, 2017. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-262)** Arezo Píriz, Enrique. ["Aspectos patrimoniales cuestionables en la Ley Nº 18.246 de "Union Concubinaria""](http://www.poderjudicial.gub.uy/images/Aspectos_patrimoniales_cuestionables_en_la_Ley_18246.pdf) (PDF) (in Spanish). [Judiciary of Uruguay](/source/Judiciary_of_Uruguay). [Archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20190709095239/http://www.poderjudicial.gub.uy/images/Aspectos_patrimoniales_cuestionables_en_la_Ley_18246.pdf) (PDF) from the original on July 9, 2019. Retrieved April 11, 2017. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-263)** ["Hong Kong legislature to debate same-sex unions this year"](https://web.archive.org/web/20160304123453/http://www.gaystarnews.com/article/hong-kong-legislature-debate-same-sex-unions-year250515/). 25 May 2015. Archived from [the original](http://www.gaystarnews.com/article/hong-kong-legislature-debate-same-sex-unions-year250515/) on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 23 April 2016. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-264)** Cabitza, Mattia (12 February 2012). ["Peru gay rights activists push for more rights in law"](https://web.archive.org/web/20140429103106/https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-16965382). *BBC News*. Archived from [the original](https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-16965382) on 29 April 2014. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-265)** ["Bill protecting same-sex couples' property rights filed"](https://www.gmanetwork.com/news/story/332163/news/nation/bill-protecting-same-sex-couples-property-rights-filed). 23 October 2013. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-266)** ["New Polish government eyes legalisation of same-sex civil partnerships"](https://www.euractiv.com/section/politics/news/new-polish-government-eyes-legalisation-of-same-sex-civil-partnerships/). 15 January 2024. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-267)** ["ECHR condemns Romania for violating gay couples' rights"](https://timesofmalta.com/article/echr-condemns-romania-violating-gay-couples-rights.1033340). *Times of Malta*. 23 May 2023. Retrieved 19 March 2026. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-268)** Bolocan, Valentin (25 May 2023). ["Ce este parteneriatul civil, care a pus România pe jar după decizia CEDO"](https://adevarul.ro/stiri-interne/evenimente/ce-este-parteneriatul-civil-care-a-pus-romania-pe-2269937.html). *Adevărul*. Retrieved 19 March 2026. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-269)** ["Convention (No.32) on the recognition of registered partnerships – CIEC"](https://ciec1.org/en/convention/convention-no-32-on-the-recognition-of-registered-partnerships/). *ciec1.org*. Retrieved 2025-05-13. 1. **[^](#cite_ref-270)** Shúilleabháin, Máire Ní (January 2019). ["Private International Law Implications of 'Equal Civil Partnerships'"](https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-and-comparative-law-quarterly/article/abs/private-international-law-implications-of-equal-civil-partnerships/B4C6E8EA20407E3E673094738FB0CB1A). *International & Comparative Law Quarterly*. **68** (1): 161–173. [doi](/source/Doi_(identifier)):[10.1017/S0020589318000453](https://doi.org/10.1017%2FS0020589318000453). [ISSN](/source/ISSN_(identifier)) [0020-5893](https://search.worldcat.org/issn/0020-5893). **Notes** 1. **[^](#cite_ref-139)** Manitoba law allows for same- and opposite-sex couples to voluntarily register their common-law relationship with the provincial vital statistics agency, as an alternative to the requirement to cohabit for a minimum period of time. ## External links - Media related to [Civil union](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Civil_union) at Wikimedia Commons - [The European Laboratory on Marriage and Registered Partnership](https://web.archive.org/web/20081227001738/http://www.disced.unisa.it/lemur/ENGLISH/LEMUR_2_Eng.htm) - [The Vermont Guide to Civil Unions, Vermont Secretary of State](https://web.archive.org/web/20070115005016/http://www.sec.state.vt.us/otherprg/civilunions/civilunions.html) - [Civil Union Fact Sheet, Australian Capital Territory web site](https://web.archive.org/web/20060821202943/http://chiefminister.act.gov.au/media.asp?media=927&id=927§ion=24&title=Jon%20Stanhope,%20MLA) - [Same-Sex Marriage, Civil Unions, and Domestic Partnerships](https://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/s/same_sex_marriage/index.html) topic page from *[The New York Times](/source/The_New_York_Times)* v t e LGBTQ people (topic outline) Academic fields Discourse LGBTQ topics in education Gender studies Lesbian feminism Linguistics Literature gay lesbian transgender Psychology Queer studies Queer theory Transfeminism Community Culture Anthems Awards literary Bars gay lesbian Bisexual community Businesses Coming out Community centers Cross-dressing drag king drag queen Events awareness periods Film festivals Gay village Gay-friendly Icons Literature Music Media bury your gays films new queer cinema periodicals portrayal Organizations People Pets Pride Pride Month pride parade Queerplatonic relationships Religious groups Rodeos Same-sex relationships Slang Slogans Sports Pride Night Takatāpui Theatre companies Tourism Symbols Black triangle Gaysper Labrys Lambda Pink triangle Rainbow plaque Pride flags Aromantic Asexual Bear Bisexual Gay flag of South Africa Gay men Intersex Leather Lesbian Non-binary Pansexual Rainbow Progress rainbow crossing Transgender Gender identities Sexual identities Sexual diversities Gender identity Agender Androgyny Boi Cisgender Gender bender Genderfluid Gender nonconformity Khanith Man Non-binary / genderqueer Theyby Transgender Akava'ine Trans man Transsexual Trans woman mak nyah Woman Womxn Womyn Xenogender Third sex / Third gender Bakla Balkan sworn virgins Bissu Faʻafafine Fakaleitī Femminiello Hijra Kathoey Köçek Māhū Mukhannath Muxe Travesti Two-spirit Winkte Sexual identities Sexual orientations Asexual Bisexual Homosexual Aromanticism Asexuality Gray asexuality Demisexuality Aegosexuality Attraction to transgender people Banjee Bi-curious Fictosexuality Gay Gay men Heteroflexible Lesbian Monosexual Non-heterosexual Pansexual Queer Questioning Romantic orientation Same gender loving Sexual minority Tom / Dee Related Acronyms LGBTQ Detransition Effeminacy Erotic target location error Ex-gay Ex-ex-gay Female Gender and sexual diversity Gender assignment Gender binary Gender essentialism Gender expression Gender neutrality Gender roles Gender transition Health organizations Hermaphrodite Human female sexuality Human male sexuality Intersex Androgynos Tumtum Legal status of transgender people Male Men who have sex with men / Sexual practices between men Sex–gender distinction Sexuality and gender identity-based cultures Social construction of gender Straight ally Tomboy Transgender health care misinformation Women who have sex with women / Sexual practices between women History LGBTQ history History of homosexuality History of gay men in the United States History of lesbianism Transgender history timeline Timeline of asexual history LGBTQ history timeline Migration Social movements students History of Christianity and homosexuality History of same-sex unions Pederasty Category:LGBTQ history Pre-modern era Adelphopoiesis Ancient Egypt Ancient Greece pre-Columbian Peru Ancient Rome Medieval Europe 16th to 19th century Molly house Section 377 First homosexual movement 20th century Dance of the Forty-One Institut für Sexualwissenschaft Persecution of homosexuals in Nazi Germany Transgender people in Nazi Germany Cadet scandal Florida Legislative Investigation Committee Sea queens Compton's Cafeteria riot Stonewall riots Gay Liberation Front Handkerchief code Festival of Light action White Night riots Front homosexuel d'action révolutionnaire Florida orange juice boycott Operation Soap Epidemiology of HIV/AIDS ACT UP Section 28 Tasty nightclub raid Bar Abanicos police raid 21st century Timeline of same-sex marriage Lawrence v. Texas Russian anti-LGBTQ law Anti-Homosexuality Act, 2014 Rainbow wave Rainbow Night 2020s anti-LGBTQ movement in the United States Trump-era persecution of transgender people Rights and legal issues LGBTQ rights by country or territory Africa Americas Asia Europe Oceania List of LGBTQ rights articles by region LGBTQ rights topics Capital punishment for homosexuality Censorship of LGBTQ issues Civil unions and partnerships Criminalization of homosexuality decriminalization Hate crime laws Intersex human rights Military service Same-sex parenting adoption Assisted reproduction Same-sex marriage timeline Socialism Legal status of transgender people Transgender rights movement V-coding United Nations/Yogyakarta Principles La Francophonie Commonwealth of Nations LGBTQ rights movements Homophile Gay liberation LGBTQ rights groups LGBTQ rights activists Rainbow capitalism Separatism gay lesbian Sexual orientation – Medicine, science and sexology Autism and LGBTQ people Biology Birth order Demographics Disability and LGBTQ people Environment Homosexuality and psychology Homosexuality in the DSM Kinsey scale Klein Grid Life expectancy Neuroscience Prenatal hormones Sexual inversion Conversion therapy Split attraction model Sexual orientation identity Timeline of sexual orientation and medicine Societal attitudes Prejudice Violence Societal attitudes Amatonormativity Heteronormativity Heteropatriarchy Homonationalism Pinkwashing Gay panic defense Opposition to LGBTQ rights anti-LGBTQ rhetoric LGBTQ stereotypes Suicide among LGBTQ people list Monuments and memorials Queerbaiting Homosexuality and religion Transgender people and religion Prejudice and discrimination Arophobia Acephobia Anti-gender movement AIDS stigma Biphobia Gayphobia Grooming conspiracy theory Heterosexism Homophobia liberal Discrimination against lesbians Discrimination against non-binary people Racism Riddle scale SPLC-designated list of anti-LGBTQ hate groups Transmisogyny Transphobia Violence against LGBTQ people Corrective rape Capital punishment for homosexuality Gay bashing Violence against LGBTQ people history in the UK in the US transgender people unlawful killings Persecution of homosexuals in Nazi Germany Stop Murder Music LGBTQ portal Category Authority control databases International GND National United States France BnF data Czech Republic Israel Other Yale LUX --- Adapted from the Wikipedia article [Civil union](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_union) by Wikipedia contributors ([contributor history](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_union?action=history)). Available under [Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Changes may have been made.